Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 21:56, September 24, 2013 by Newman66 (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion

Zombiebaronvs.Braydie

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):


Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.


Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd Archive tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


Hampster

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 7470 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny and very un-encyclopedic. No images just random rant. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Created in 2005. In 2009, editor TPCBD arrived, so if you are wondering about the acronym in the second paragraph and at the start of Military Ranking, it is a specific Uncyclopedian quoting himself. This fanboy cheerleading has no purpose except to guide readers to the external website given at the end. Spıke ¬ 13:10,13:12 22-Sep-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming features and an annoying p in the title. --Sog1970 (talk) 13:11, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Heinrich himmler is GAY

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 7470 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another in-joke that ought be in someone's userspace. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A stub with a surprisingly long history. Melds the Nazi meme with the GAY meme. Worthless. No comedy payback for the choice to write in the first person. Spıke ¬ 12:37 22-Sep-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Atrocious. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:41, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Although the picture is quite fetching. --Sog1970 (talk) 12:52, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
    It is widely used and will not be a casualty if you vote to delete the article. Spıke ¬ 13:07 22-Sep-13
  5. Symbol kill vote Kill. Very bad article. It's quite similar to Mr winkler is GAY and Mr winkler is COOL, but with the addition of mentioning Heinrich Himmler instead of Francis Winkler. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:56, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

19 Kids and Counting (redirect at The Duggar Family)

Score: 0
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Keepable now. Spıke ¬ 12:58 21-Sep-13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Poor article from 2008 that has been bad and offending since then. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • I've renamed this article to align with the actual name of the TV show and its Wikipedia article, and will edit it to make clear that the Duggars are not specific, non-celebrity individuals being cyberbullied (for which I briefly banned Anon). It is a cruft magnet, as the TV show is about a Christian family with a disdain for birth control. Anyone with a beef about breeders, Christians, and toothless hillbillies, will pile on. At the moment, the article has no comedy strategy except ridiculing the Duggar Family, and by extension any family that shares their values, and calling them sluts. This could be remedied. Spıke ¬ 22:58 16-Sep-13
  • I rewrote the "Before kids" section so that it aligns more closely with the Wikipedia article, and I think it works better. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:37, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
    Yikes! hope that isn't autobiographical! Also, the table of the 19 kids is serving the exact function that listcruft usually does: As an Anon magnet to tell the same joke again. Is there a better approach here? Spıke ¬ 12:58 21-Sep-13
    No, I never married or had kids, and my conversion experience was much earlier in life (and not at a service), so it's not autobiographical. As to the table, a better approach would be to have a section about each one of the kids, with a corresponding paragraph (similar to the one I deleted about the oldest because it failed hard), but I am not familiar enough with the show or the kids to do so myself. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 15:56, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
    Me neither, having temporarily concluded (see above) that this was Anon thinking his neighbors the Duggars needed ridiculing on Uncyclopedia. Your suggestion would solve the table's problem, if anyone out there can undertake it. Spıke ¬ 17:14 21-Sep-13

ChavScum

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 7613 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This page has been on the site since 2006. It is the essence of chav-cruft and used to contain a section inviting future editors to document individual chavs. Editorializing in the page title and the title's unusual spelling (which no random reader is ever going to type) is because its sole purpose has always been to document, and to guide Uncyclopedia readers to, a specific blog in the .uk domain (references now removed). It is not original comedy writing. Spıke ¬ 13:49 16-Sep-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bang and the article is gone! Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:31, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Absolute wank. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't think this article is funny. Voted. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 02:13, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Fuck Me

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 7638 hours
Keep (1)
  1. Keep. I just voted to save this good article deja vu style. Will take out the one quote too many. ALeIsTeR 15-9-'13
    You didn't. I just have (removed Wilde #2 and "Some redneck guy"). It doesn't change a thing. Deleting Section 4 (the listcruft) wouldn't help either. Spıke ¬ 23:59 15-Sep-13
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The point of this page is the glee of swearing to strangers. When it documents the many uses of the word "fuck," it's informative and not funny. When it dabbles in history, it's babbling and not funny. Spıke ¬ 12:48 15-Sep-13
  3. Symbol EXTERMINATE vote small EXTERMINATE!  Awful. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Insert gratuitous link to Tvtropes article on Screw Yourself. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 17:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)(Curse you abusefilter17 D:)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. The article is funny from time to time. But you can see how the author struggles with himself in order to write comedy and not a pornographic novel. At some moments, you can actually see a border between the two. P.S. I did not understand why the "the whore I am" picture violated Wikia terms of use. But, anyway, we won't need this image anymore, of the article gets deleted. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 07:38, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Rucka Rucka Ali

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 7655 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. A real article, about a real "comedian", with a real comedy strategy: Misstate the source material. Ali does not seem like a good comedian, mostly specializing in racial stereotypes; and this article isn't the best ever, mostly replacing the truth about Ali with the exact opposite without using the change to make a clever point, but it is trying to do what we try to do. Spıke ¬ 11:18 15-Sep-13
  2. Per Spike. Aleister 15-9
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bad article, and I don't see any thing that funny in this article. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Pantera

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 7672 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A gamer provides his view of the band. To-wit: "a merry group of fags, who one day decided to record the sound of there own love making." If you jump in despite that Intro, the first section tells a joke with excessive recursion. It is nothing but toilet humor thereafter, and that's after I deleted a listing of band members and the usual Discography. Spıke ¬ 02:48 14-Sep-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:25, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Easy button That was easy. Terrible article first made in 2005, during the very early days of Uncyclopedia. It had improved some more, then someone added pictures and more other stuff. Then, someone decided to blank part of it, and it still remained a very poor and unfunny article for years. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:13, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
    If you have found a version in the page history that you think is better, you are welcome to substitute it (and reattach {{VFD}}) and we'll vote on that. In fact, the nominator is supposed to do that. Spıke ¬ 13:18 14-Sep-13
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:16, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Perrin Aybara

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 7870 hours
Keep (1)
  1. Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. Aleister 19:00 in these parts
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am not convinced that Anon today at Talk:Perrin Aybara ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. Spıke ¬ 21:23 5-Sep-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. God, this is awful. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The quotes are bad and once they are removed it leaves nothing. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:46, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is very old and I don't think the author will ever want to come back. But we can still notify him. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Easy button That was easy. Not funny. It is somewhat possible that someone can salvage this. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Hot dog

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 7948 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a penis, something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to Dogshit sandwich would kill two birds with one stone. Spıke ¬ 14:56 2-Sep-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. I am planning to make an improvement to this article in my userspace and removing the lower organ jokes and other stupid stuff. And this would probably be the case. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 20:55, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
    Your "plan" seems to have halted voting on this page. Please take a copy of it now (or ask me for a copy after it gets deleted). Deletion will not bar you or anyone from writing a replacement page. Spıke ¬ 14:15 14-Sep-13

Archived VFD Discussions

Template:VFDarchive

Personal tools
projects