Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Revision as of 07:12, September 9, 2013 by Anton199 (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Deletion Policy
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

Rules and procedures:

  1. If you're too lazy to read the deletion policy, please, at least, carefully read this list of rules.
    1. But seriously, read the deletion policy.
    2. Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
    3. Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
  2. If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
    1. Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
    2. Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
    3. Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
  3. If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
    1. Thank you.
    2. No really, thank you.
    3. Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
    4. Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
      1. # - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
      2. Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
      3. --~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
  4. Do not revert edits of the administrators.
  5. If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month or you will get a bollocking.
  6. If you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith, do not remove anything from VFD; doing so will get you banned for a very long time.

Pages for Deletion


Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.

How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):

Notes for Administrators:

  • Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
  • To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
  • If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the 🔒 Closed nomination H T D Oldvfd Archive tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.


Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 23115 hours
Keep (1)
  1. I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. Aleister 19:05 a very good year
    It's not a game, Aleister; Vocaloid is a teenage singer, Miku, created on the compuetr (saying simply, Miku is a computer program). But she still has many fans and even outside Japan. Anton (talk) 07:12, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. Chaoarren (talk) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Boombot BOOMBOT!! This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Even though Vocaloid is popular, we need something else. The author could have made fun of Japanese teenagers, who fall in love with a computer program, Japanese culture etc. etc. Anton (talk) 07:12, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Thïs entry is not recording my "Keep" vote. Please look in the edit" and you will see it there. Aleister 19:10 also a very good year
    It now is. Anton (talk) 19:36, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

🔒 N.W.A. H T D Survivor Oldvfd Archive

Score: -2
Elapsed Time: 23145 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. Spıke Ѧ 11:50 7-Sep-13
    Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? Anton (talk) 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
    It is File:Nwa4px.gif. Anton (talk) 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
    Now restored, but only used once in the article. Spıke Ѧ 03:30 8-Sep-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --Sog1970 (talk) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)
  1. Symbol delete vote Article with attitude It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. Anton (talk) 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
    Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). Anton (talk) 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
  • Vote closed--nomination withdrawn. Spıke Ѧ 03:30 8-Sep-13

Perrin Aybara

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 23183 hours
Keep (1)

Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. Aleister in Chains 19:00 in these parts

Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am not convinced that Anon today at Talk:Perrin Aybara ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. Spıke Ѧ 21:23 5-Sep-13

Worst 100 Porn Stars of All Time

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 23189 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not really worth keeping, is it? Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." Spıke Ѧ 15:49 5-Sep-13
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. NOW! Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
    Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. Spıke Ѧ 11:26 6-Sep-13
  5. Symbol EXTERMINATE vote small EXTERMINATE!  I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
    I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. Spıke Ѧ 16:15 8-Sep-13
    You do? And how about Minitrue? Anton (talk) 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Hot dog

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 23261 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a penis, something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to Dogshit sandwich would kill two birds with one stone. Spıke Ѧ 14:56 2-Sep-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Bearded dragon

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 23285 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. As I voted in 2011. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (Pogona barbata) is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. Spıke Ѧ 15:48 1-Sep-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--Sog1970 (talk) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
    I gave it a bit more, relating it to Samson and the bearded clam. Spıke Ѧ 17:07 2-Sep-13
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)


Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 23350 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on Alex Rodriguez--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 29-Aug-13
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
    A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. Spıke Ѧ 17:37 30-Aug-13
    I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
    Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol will tell you what the big deal is.) Spıke Ѧ 21:46 30-Aug-13
    I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)


Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 23479 hours
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor kotra wasn't the subject of it. GreenReaper (talk) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
    I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. Spıke Ѧ 19:41 24-Aug-13
  2. Pacman Pacman. The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. Spıke Ѧ 12:48 24-Aug-13
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. Sir ScottPat (talk) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What did you find there? Anton (talk) 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions


Personal tools