Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDn|2 (number)}})
({{VFDn|Hemorrhoid}}: Correction)
 
(4,815 intermediate revisions by 89 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=={{VFDn|Wikipedia (movie)}}==
+
== {{VFDn|Chyna}} ==
{{VFDt|time=11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#Lists. Not original. 11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC) {{User:Anton199/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} Might have been funny in 2005; see also '''Comments''' below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Badder. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
*Wacky Wiki War! I deleted the dumb lists of memes, but that doesn't leave much. Intro tries to morph Wikipedia into a movie in the right way: by misusing actual Wikipedia catch-phrases. Unfortunately, it doesn't use them in a way that has any special meaning. That would be clever. It seems there are two sequels? Together, would they make one good article? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:44 20-Oct-13</small>
 
**They would, if they existed. But the author just put links to non-existent articles on Wikipedia itself. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
**:How helpful of him! Thanks for deleting them. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:43 20-Oct-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== {{VFDn|Bork}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=23:18, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDt|time=10:15, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=5
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} "A communist language originating in the country of reds," about which all we can say is that Scandinavian languages look funny as they are very foreign; also, lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:15 21-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:18 7-May-15</small>
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:04, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} I gave up after the first sentence. [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] ([[User talk:BrokenKnives|talk]]) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Bad. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I'm with [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] on this one. I maybe got a ''little'' further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Don't want to worry about wiping this entirely, just maintaining this article. Maybe if the time this article is about to get deleted, maybe redirect it to [[Swedish Chef]] and explain a little of it there? {{User:Newman66/sig}} 01:39, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{For}} A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#:Why? Is the article internet famous? {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Wilford "God" Brimley}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|A Day at the Barn with Hitler}} ==
{{VFDt|time=10:27, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Wilford Brimley is one of the minor memes on the website, and this article is for people who wanted him to be a religion — without doing the least to cleverly show how the real Brimley might resemble a religion. Even the "Holy Document" in the style of Brimley himself swings-and-misses at comedy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:08, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{delete|Can't survive as is.}} If someone had the energy to rework some of the better material into [[Wilford Brimley]] we might be able to salvage some of it, but not enough to survive as a page on it's own. [[Wilford Brimley]] is better, but still short of being good. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:00 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}}Unnecessary spawn of a not too interesting original. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} This doesn't seem to be that bad, but it may need some improvement or salvaging. When it gets <s>improved</s> deleted, it can be moved or redirected back to Wilford Brimley. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 12:47, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:No, it can't; there is already an article at [[Wilford Brimley]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:06 21-Oct-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
=={{VFDn|2 (number)}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=01:55, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDt|time=20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't think it could be featured or anything of this kind, but contains some great jokes. I especially liked fake scientific bits, such as "2+2 approaches infinity for very large values of 2." {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:22, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#The ghost of Chronarion urged me to vote for this. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] today
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Barely any content. Un-encyclopedic and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Barely any content — a list of quips and a reused illustration. Redirect to [[Half]] (see '''Comments''' below) and redirect the 2 key on the keyboard template as well. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Twice as crap as it could be. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:57 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#'''Delete''' {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 11:19, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*Perhaps a necessary article waiting for a re-write? I can't think of any ideas though. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:It was created by {{U|Chronarion}} at the very start of Uncyclopedia in 2005. But it has nearly no content. It also has the identical illustration whose cleverness led me to vote Keep on [[Half]] when it was VFD'd [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive276#Half|last month]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
*''Barely any content?'' It's an article about '''two'''! What more content could it possibly have? --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 17:17, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
**Twice as much. (Rimshot) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:35 26 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Symbol}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Awful, not funny, random. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sir will add his vote here, my good man. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:49 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete|Paid by page count.}} Author makes it clear from the start that he has nothing to say, and that that will not stop him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:46 22-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:06, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Can I borrow 5 bucks?}}==
 
{{VFDg|time=08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
#<s>I like it. But it will do with more images. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Not funny. Un-encyclopedic. Second person narrative. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:19 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#Borderline. See comments. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ok, it actually is not that good, and the last comments convinced me. I liked the image part. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} No.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:48, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
* First read through put it on the borderline. Second read through and it's a weak attempt. Just not funny enough to warrant it's inclusion as a non-encyclopaedic article, and it doesn't quite fit into any other namespace. A decent rewrite and it could become a “HowTo:Borrow five bucks”, or maybe “UnScripts:That guy you once knew”. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|6 (number)}}==
 
{{VFDg|time=08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic. Not funny. Boring. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absurdly long anything is now a trite old joke. Using {{Tag|math}} to write 6 in the most complicated way possible, and then repeating it 22 times, is just self-congratulation. Ten initial quotations, four of them of the bickering-quotation variety, citing ''The Prisoner.'' A tiny bit of humor, repeated ''ad nauseam'' to avoid confusion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:24 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} removed the horrific &lt;math> aspect, but still sucks. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:54 24 Oct 2013}}
 
#Bad. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:25, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Reads like a list without the bullet points. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:44, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Seven (number)}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{Delete}} Random, memish, not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I looked up the number seven but the first sentence tells me I'm going to be reading about "the Garfish tribe of half-fish people." And the rest of the article is Wacky Religion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Completely disagree with the above rationales. The wacky religion angle is a good way to work with a very limited topic. What kills this is lack of cohesive nonsense - random humour works best when there is an inherit illogical logic, like a Douglas Adams book. Add to that poor spelling, grammar, formatting, and lack of images. Something more like [[crossbow]] would work - this doesn't. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:27 29 Oct 2013}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|:Category:Things that you can sing to the tune of In the Hall of the Mountain King}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Seems like a kind of nit-picking category Wikipedia would have, and me thinks we should keep most of these for the smiles. It can be expanded on the Category page, as I did with the category 'People who didn't fuck your mother in the kitchen last night' after Msnbc tried repeatedly to kill it (murderer!). But this one could be more selective on what it's put on. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 10:53 25-10-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Can't be used to find articles through it. Used in random articles that have nothing to do with the Hall of the Mountain King. --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by {{U|Thetoastman}} in 2006. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:55 10-May-15</small>
#{{Delete}} Aye; trade to Illogicopedia for future draft picks. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:31 24-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} If it is not original work, it should go.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Comment}} These titles have one thing in common: They have 7 syllables, which *could* correspond to the first 7 notes of Hall of the Mountain King. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 03:21, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|;}} (aka [[Semicolon]])==
 
{{VFDt|time=13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Have added some stuff, including a 'Popular Culture' section which could be expanded. I hate to see any of these articles about "things on a keyboard" go the way of all flesh. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 25-10
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} So short, practically pointless. Filler article with no humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Untrue ≠ funny. "It is much cooler than it's [sic] brother" isn't either. Deleting this will free up the space for something good. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 25-Oct-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
* How can someone write about the anal orifice of a truck so poorly? Reserving vote to see if Al comes back to it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:39 29 Oct 2013}}
 
*:Because of your sick comment I went back there, but please don't make me do it again, it's dark and the noises unnerve me. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] coming back from hell itself
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Visual kei}}==
 
{{VFDg|time=14:10, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gigantic article on a Japanese music genre, obviously created by Japanese who aren't good at English and don't realize this is a humor wiki, for the primary purpose of documenting and gathering interest to the subject. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:10 25-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. Heavy use of [[Capitalism: in grammar]] THERE which adds an un-encyclopedic nature. Also it is not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 14:17, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} It reads better in the original Russian. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:48 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} "Musical Phagocterstics". Say No More! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:45, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't vote to delete until I've read the whole thing, and this was a very long and unhumorous read. I checked the Wikipedia article, and a good portion of the article is sporked, except where it concerns individual bands. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:27, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Until today, there were a large number of links to YouTube, and footnotes, including one referenced from all over that read, "Saddly, this is True." That (spelling, syntax, and lack of humor) are all the problems summed up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:13 25-Oct-13</small>
+
*This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:40 10-May-15</small>
  +
*::Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:31 25-May-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|A newt wizard did it}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Labor Party}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=12:45, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=4
+
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete}} Last one of the mashed up wizards doing it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} Uncyclopedians basing articles not on real-world "encyclopedia" reality but on other Uncyclopedia articles are writing to themselves and showing contempt for our readers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 28-Oct-13</small>
 
#This joke stopped being funny the moment someone decided to create 500 articles on it {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 23:40, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
#The image is worth keeping, though. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:25, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep}} Each in-joke has its bastard children, and they, together, create a mosaic of the overall in-joke. And if you took this one out mnnbvvccxz would have your throat in his hands and apply the pressure. I was never into the Newt in-joke, but some people are. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 28-10
+
#{{Keep}} I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin {{U|Mnbvcxz}} (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:58 11-May-15</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* Just for those that are concerned, I'm only nominating mashed up in-jokes. You may notice [[Butt poop]], [[Grue]], and [[A wizard did it]] haven't been nominated, just the mash-up in-jokes. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
+
*Not to be confused with [[Labour Party (UK)]]. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*Not to be confused with the Labor Party in Australia either. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:30, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|The "No Cajek Allowed"'s of Uncyclopedia}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Al Qaeda Chicken}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=17:56, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=13:37, May 24, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=4
+
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#A mixture of in-jokes. Grue, Cajek, trite jokes about Japan and bad prose, stolen from another article ([[The "No Gaijin Allowed"'s of Japan]]). {{User:Anton199/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 24-May-15</small>
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} An archetypal in-joke, a parody of a niche article on a parody website. Target audience might be 3 people, none of whom are still here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 31-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
#:Sorry for not putting it the right way. It is just that I used the tag system and the article got placed here automatically. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:16, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Nativitism. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:23 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#Redundo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:50, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
* On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual [[KFC]] article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Write a HowTo that will get featured}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house}} ==
   
{{VFDg|time=19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=13:41, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=6
+
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Rather old and has not been improved on since several months ago. There is some concept but this is probably the same one as of [[HowTo:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia]] and maybe [[HowTo:Write an average Uncyclopedia article]], but with the worse prose, less worked out structure and a title that is not justified (the author does not even talk about writing HowTos, he comes back to it but is still always off-topic). For those who may say that it still has some humour, I provided the above two links: these two articles serve for the same purpose but are funnier. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:24, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} A chatty article about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:41 25-May-15</small>
#{{Delete}} The author is the nominator. The article is a cheap imitation. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 31-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 12:08, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Author request. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ditto. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:51, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sorry but [[HowTo talk:Write a HowTo that will get featured|this]] says all. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*ScottPat reviewed it a while ago and I apologize to him for making his efforts pointless, but the author himself did not take these comments into account. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
* I don't think this is a deleteable article based upon merit, but I support the author's right to request deletion. I'd recommend that it be added to QVFD rather than putting it to the vote, if that's what the author wants. If it were mine, and I didn't feel it had enough merit to survive, I'd be inclined to move it to my user space though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:21 01 Nov 2013}}
 
**I did not think I could QVFD it, especially because of Scott's review. And what I move to my user space, is something I would like to keep. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
***I think it's worth keeping. Far better than [[Worst 100 Ways To Be Castrated]] or [[Carebear]], which are two of my earliest attempts. But in respect of your right to delete your own work - and only because of that - I will vote to delete. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
****Thanks. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:13, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Cat Nation}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Hemorrhoid}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=22:12, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
+
|delnumber=2
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Make it go where Kittenolivia went, and for the same reason. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:12 1-Nov-13</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Catspace}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=22:16, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Another fictional-country (this time, universe) article formerly found on [[:Template:Latin America]]; a merger of Randumbo, cuteness, and memes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:16 1-Nov-13</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
* For those interested in the history of this, it was previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive179|voted kept 5-3]] in March 2009. No real rationale except "there is a lot worse" {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:45 01 Nov 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Invisia}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=23:35, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It's not about anything and no one is ever going to look it up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:35 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Admin {{U|Zim ulator}} swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 25-May-15</small>
  +
#:Sorry, I guess the final word does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 25-May-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=

Latest revision as of 23:10, May 25, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Chyna H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 431 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). Spıke Ѧ 23:18 7-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I gave up after the first sentence. BrokenKnives (talk) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm with BrokenKnives on this one. I maybe got a little further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol for vote For. A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
    Why? Is the article internet famous? SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit A Day at the Barn with Hitler H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 381 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by Thetoastman in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:55 10-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it is not original work, it should go.--EStop (talk) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
    To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 10-May-15
    Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --EStop (talk) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
    If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 18:31 25-May-15

edit Labor Party H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 369 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin Mnbvcxz (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 11-May-15
Comments

edit Al Qaeda Chicken H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 33 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. Spıke Ѧ 13:37 24-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual KFC article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

edit What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 9 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A chatty article about nothing. Spıke Ѧ 13:41 25-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hemorrhoid H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 0 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Admin Zim ulator swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. Spıke Ѧ 23:04 25-May-15
    Sorry, I guess the final word does. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 25-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects