Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDn|2 (number)}})
m ({{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}})
 
(4,942 intermediate revisions by 92 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=={{VFDn|Wikipedia (movie)}}==
+
== {{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}} ==
{{VFDt|time=11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#Lists. Not original. 11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC) {{User:Anton199/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} Might have been funny in 2005; see also '''Comments''' below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Badder. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
*Wacky Wiki War! I deleted the dumb lists of memes, but that doesn't leave much. Intro tries to morph Wikipedia into a movie in the right way: by misusing actual Wikipedia catch-phrases. Unfortunately, it doesn't use them in a way that has any special meaning. That would be clever. It seems there are two sequels? Together, would they make one good article? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:44 20-Oct-13</small>
 
**They would, if they existed. But the author just put links to non-existent articles on Wikipedia itself. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
**:How helpful of him! Thanks for deleting them. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:43 20-Oct-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== {{VFDn|Bork}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDt|time=10:15, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} "A communist language originating in the country of reds," about which all we can say is that Scandinavian languages look funny as they are very foreign; also, lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:15 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:04, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Bad. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't want to worry about wiping this entirely, just maintaining this article. Maybe if the time this article is about to get deleted, maybe redirect it to [[Swedish Chef]] and explain a little of it there? {{User:Newman66/sig}} 01:39, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Wilford "God" Brimley}} ==
 
{{VFDt|time=10:27, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
|delete=
+
|delete=#Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Wilford Brimley is one of the minor memes on the website, and this article is for people who wanted him to be a religion — without doing the least to cleverly show how the real Brimley might resemble a religion. Even the "Holy Document" in the style of Brimley himself swings-and-misses at comedy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 21-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Pointless. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:04 6-Jun-15</small>
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:08, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
#{{delete|Can't survive as is.}} If someone had the energy to rework some of the better material into [[Wilford Brimley]] we might be able to salvage some of it, but not enough to survive as a page on it's own. [[Wilford Brimley]] is better, but still short of being good. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:00 22 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}}Unnecessary spawn of a not too interesting original. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
|keepnumber=1
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} This doesn't seem to be that bad, but it may need some improvement or salvaging. When it gets <s>improved</s> deleted, it can be moved or redirected back to Wilford Brimley. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 12:47, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:No, it can't; there is already an article at [[Wilford Brimley]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:06 21-Oct-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDn|2 (number)}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes}} ==
{{VFDt|time=20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't think it could be featured or anything of this kind, but contains some great jokes. I especially liked fake scientific bits, such as "2+2 approaches infinity for very large values of 2." {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:22, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#The ghost of Chronarion urged me to vote for this. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] today
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Barely any content. Un-encyclopedic and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Barely any content — a list of quips and a reused illustration. Redirect to [[Half]] (see '''Comments''' below) and redirect the 2 key on the keyboard template as well. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Twice as crap as it could be. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:57 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#'''Delete''' {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 11:19, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*Perhaps a necessary article waiting for a re-write? I can't think of any ideas though. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:It was created by {{U|Chronarion}} at the very start of Uncyclopedia in 2005. But it has nearly no content. It also has the identical illustration whose cleverness led me to vote Keep on [[Half]] when it was VFD'd [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive276#Half|last month]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
*''Barely any content?'' It's an article about '''two'''! What more content could it possibly have? --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 17:17, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
**Twice as much. (Rimshot) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:35 26 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
   
=={{VFDn|Symbol}}==
+
{{VFDt|time=18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDt|time=10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
|delete=#{{Delete}} Awful, not funny, random. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sir will add his vote here, my good man. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:49 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete|Paid by page count.}} Author makes it clear from the start that he has nothing to say, and that that will not stop him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:46 22-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:06, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Can I borrow 5 bucks?}}==
 
{{VFDg|time=08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
#<s>I like it. But it will do with more images. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Not funny. Un-encyclopedic. Second person narrative. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:19 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#Borderline. See comments. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ok, it actually is not that good, and the last comments convinced me. I liked the image part. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} No.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:48, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
* First read through put it on the borderline. Second read through and it's a weak attempt. Just not funny enough to warrant it's inclusion as a non-encyclopaedic article, and it doesn't quite fit into any other namespace. A decent rewrite and it could become a “HowTo:Borrow five bucks”, or maybe “UnScripts:That guy you once knew”. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|6 (number)}}==
 
{{VFDg|time=08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic. Not funny. Boring. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absurdly long anything is now a trite old joke. Using {{Tag|math}} to write 6 in the most complicated way possible, and then repeating it 22 times, is just self-congratulation. Ten initial quotations, four of them of the bickering-quotation variety, citing ''The Prisoner.'' A tiny bit of humor, repeated ''ad nauseam'' to avoid confusion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:24 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} removed the horrific &lt;math> aspect, but still sucks. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:54 24 Oct 2013}}
 
#Bad. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:25, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Reads like a list without the bullet points. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:44, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Seven (number)}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Random, memish, not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I looked up the number seven but the first sentence tells me I'm going to be reading about "the Garfish tribe of half-fish people." And the rest of the article is Wacky Religion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Completely disagree with the above rationales. The wacky religion angle is a good way to work with a very limited topic. What kills this is lack of cohesive nonsense - random humour works best when there is an inherit illogical logic, like a Douglas Adams book. Add to that poor spelling, grammar, formatting, and lack of images. Something more like [[crossbow]] would work - this doesn't. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:27 29 Oct 2013}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|:Category:Things that you can sing to the tune of In the Hall of the Mountain King}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Seems like a kind of nit-picking category Wikipedia would have, and me thinks we should keep most of these for the smiles. It can be expanded on the Category page, as I did with the category 'People who didn't fuck your mother in the kitchen last night' after Msnbc tried repeatedly to kill it (murderer!). But this one could be more selective on what it's put on. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 10:53 25-10-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Can't be used to find articles through it. Used in random articles that have nothing to do with the Hall of the Mountain King. --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Aye; trade to Illogicopedia for future draft picks. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:31 24-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Comment}} These titles have one thing in common: They have 7 syllables, which *could* correspond to the first 7 notes of Hall of the Mountain King. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 03:21, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|;}} (aka [[Semicolon]])==
 
{{VFDt|time=13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Have added some stuff, including a 'Popular Culture' section which could be expanded. I hate to see any of these articles about "things on a keyboard" go the way of all flesh. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 25-10
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} So short, practically pointless. Filler article with no humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Untrue ≠ funny. "It is much cooler than it's [sic] brother" isn't either. Deleting this will free up the space for something good. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 25-Oct-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
* How can someone write about the anal orifice of a truck so poorly? Reserving vote to see if Al comes back to it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:39 29 Oct 2013}}
 
*:Because of your sick comment I went back there, but please don't make me do it again, it's dark and the noises unnerve me. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] coming back from hell itself
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Visual kei}}==
 
{{VFDg|time=14:10, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gigantic article on a Japanese music genre, obviously created by Japanese who aren't good at English and don't realize this is a humor wiki, for the primary purpose of documenting and gathering interest to the subject. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:10 25-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. Heavy use of [[Capitalism: in grammar]] THERE which adds an un-encyclopedic nature. Also it is not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 14:17, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} It reads better in the original Russian. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:48 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} "Musical Phagocterstics". Say No More! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:45, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't vote to delete until I've read the whole thing, and this was a very long and unhumorous read. I checked the Wikipedia article, and a good portion of the article is sporked, except where it concerns individual bands. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:27, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Until today, there were a large number of links to YouTube, and footnotes, including one referenced from all over that read, "Saddly, this is True." That (spelling, syntax, and lack of humor) are all the problems summed up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:13 25-Oct-13</small>
+
*Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
  +
::You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like [[Rembrandt]] or [[Glory hole]]), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|A newt wizard did it}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Never-Ending Story}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=12:45, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=08:19, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete}} Last one of the mashed up wizards doing it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} Image-free randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} Uncyclopedians basing articles not on real-world "encyclopedia" reality but on other Uncyclopedia articles are writing to themselves and showing contempt for our readers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 28-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Never compose while on drugs. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:42 10-Jun-15</small>
#This joke stopped being funny the moment someone decided to create 500 articles on it {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 23:40, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
#The image is worth keeping, though. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:25, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Felt like it would never end. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|keepnumber=1
+
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep}} Each in-joke has its bastard children, and they, together, create a mosaic of the overall in-joke. And if you took this one out mnnbvvccxz would have your throat in his hands and apply the pressure. I was never into the Newt in-joke, but some people are. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 28-10
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* Just for those that are concerned, I'm only nominating mashed up in-jokes. You may notice [[Butt poop]], [[Grue]], and [[A wizard did it]] haven't been nominated, just the mash-up in-jokes. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|The "No Cajek Allowed"'s of Uncyclopedia}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=17:56, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=20:55, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=4
+
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#A mixture of in-jokes. Grue, Cajek, trite jokes about Japan and bad prose, stolen from another article ([[The "No Gaijin Allowed"'s of Japan]]). {{User:Anton199/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>20:55 21-Jun-15</small>
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} An archetypal in-joke, a parody of a niche article on a parody website. Target audience might be 3 people, none of whom are still here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 31-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
#:Sorry for not putting it the right way. It is just that I used the tag system and the article got placed here automatically. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:16, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
#Nativitism. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:23 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#Redundo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:50, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
Line 127: Line 64:
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Write a HowTo that will get featured}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}} ==
   
{{VFDg|time=19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=22:08, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=6
+
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Rather old and has not been improved on since several months ago. There is some concept but this is probably the same one as of [[HowTo:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia]] and maybe [[HowTo:Write an average Uncyclopedia article]], but with the worse prose, less worked out structure and a title that is not justified (the author does not even talk about writing HowTos, he comes back to it but is still always off-topic). For those who may say that it still has some humour, I provided the above two links: these two articles serve for the same purpose but are funnier. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:24, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} 2010 author {{U|Weri long wang}} writes the opposite of the plot of ''Atlas Shrugged,'' then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:08 21-Jun-15</small>
#{{Delete}} The author is the nominator. The article is a cheap imitation. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 31-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Not funny. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 12:08, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Author request. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ditto. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:51, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sorry but [[HowTo talk:Write a HowTo that will get featured|this]] says all. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*ScottPat reviewed it a while ago and I apologize to him for making his efforts pointless, but the author himself did not take these comments into account. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
* I don't think this is a deleteable article based upon merit, but I support the author's right to request deletion. I'd recommend that it be added to QVFD rather than putting it to the vote, if that's what the author wants. If it were mine, and I didn't feel it had enough merit to survive, I'd be inclined to move it to my user space though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:21 01 Nov 2013}}
 
**I did not think I could QVFD it, especially because of Scott's review. And what I move to my user space, is something I would like to keep. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
***I think it's worth keeping. Far better than [[Worst 100 Ways To Be Castrated]] or [[Carebear]], which are two of my earliest attempts. But in respect of your right to delete your own work - and only because of that - I will vote to delete. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
****Thanks. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:13, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Cat Nation}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Latte}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=22:12, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=18:03, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
+
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Make it go where Kittenolivia went, and for the same reason. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:12 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>18:03 26-Jun-15</small>
|keepnumber=0
+
#{{Delete}} If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
#{{Delete}} Should have called it Frappe. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=#It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Catspace}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Who Do You Think}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=22:16, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
+
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Another fictional-country (this time, universe) article formerly found on [[:Template:Latin America]]; a merger of Randumbo, cuteness, and memes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:16 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#No redeeming value as far as I can tell {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:20 28-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Baffling gibberish. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* For those interested in the history of this, it was previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive179|voted kept 5-3]] in March 2009. No real rationale except "there is a lot worse" {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:45 01 Nov 2013}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Invisia}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=23:35, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=03:35, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It's not about anything and no one is ever going to look it up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:35 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>03:35 30-Jun-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=

Latest revision as of 17:21, June 30, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 649 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pointless. Spıke Ѧ 17:04 6-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 551 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like Rembrandt or Glory hole), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)

edit Never-Ending Story H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 489 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Image-free randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never compose while on drugs. Spıke Ѧ 11:42 10-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Felt like it would never end. --EStop (talk) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 212 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 211 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Latte H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 95 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. Spıke Radiomicrophone18:03 26-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Should have called it Frappe. --EStop (talk) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit Who Do You Think H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 51 hours
Delete (3)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 13 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects