Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDn|2 (number)}})
({{VFDn|King Harkinian}})
 
(5,092 intermediate revisions by 93 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=={{VFDn|Wikipedia (movie)}}==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get Expelled from School}} ==
{{VFDt|time=11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=12:50, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Lists. Not original. 11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC) {{User:Anton199/sig}}
+
#{{Delete|A load of poopy.}} Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:50 11-Jul-15</small>
#{{Delete}} Might have been funny in 2005; see also '''Comments''' below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 21-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete|Delete.}} Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Badder. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} Pupil misbehavior ''can'' be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at [[Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]]. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Wacky Wiki War! I deleted the dumb lists of memes, but that doesn't leave much. Intro tries to morph Wikipedia into a movie in the right way: by misusing actual Wikipedia catch-phrases. Unfortunately, it doesn't use them in a way that has any special meaning. That would be clever. It seems there are two sequels? Together, would they make one good article? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:44 20-Oct-13</small>
+
*I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. [[User:Simsilikesims|Simsilikesims]] ([[User talk:Simsilikesims|talk]]) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
**They would, if they existed. But the author just put links to non-existent articles on Wikipedia itself. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
+
*:Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
**:How helpful of him! Thanks for deleting them. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:43 20-Oct-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Bork}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Redirect}} ==
{{VFDt|time=10:15, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} "A communist language originating in the country of reds," about which all we can say is that Scandinavian languages look funny as they are very foreign; also, lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:15 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:04, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Bad. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't want to worry about wiping this entirely, just maintaining this article. Maybe if the time this article is about to get deleted, maybe redirect it to [[Swedish Chef]] and explain a little of it there? {{User:Newman66/sig}} 01:39, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== {{VFDn|Wilford "God" Brimley}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDt|time=10:27, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=1
|delnumber=4
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Wilford Brimley is one of the minor memes on the website, and this article is for people who wanted him to be a religion — without doing the least to cleverly show how the real Brimley might resemble a religion. Even the "Holy Document" in the style of Brimley himself swings-and-misses at comedy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 21-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:08, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{delete|Can't survive as is.}} If someone had the energy to rework some of the better material into [[Wilford Brimley]] we might be able to salvage some of it, but not enough to survive as a page on it's own. [[Wilford Brimley]] is better, but still short of being good. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:00 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}}Unnecessary spawn of a not too interesting original. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} This doesn't seem to be that bad, but it may need some improvement or salvaging. When it gets <s>improved</s> deleted, it can be moved or redirected back to Wilford Brimley. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 12:47, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:No, it can't; there is already an article at [[Wilford Brimley]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:06 21-Oct-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|2 (number)}} ==
 
{{VFDt|time=20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Don't think it could be featured or anything of this kind, but contains some great jokes. I especially liked fake scientific bits, such as "2+2 approaches infinity for very large values of 2." {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:22, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
#The ghost of Chronarion urged me to vote for this. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] today
+
#{{Keep}} I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Barely any content. Un-encyclopedic and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Barely any content — a list of quips and a reused illustration. Redirect to [[Half]] (see '''Comments''' below) and redirect the 2 key on the keyboard template as well. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Twice as crap as it could be. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:57 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#'''Delete''' {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 11:19, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*Perhaps a necessary article waiting for a re-write? I can't think of any ideas though. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:It was created by {{U|Chronarion}} at the very start of Uncyclopedia in 2005. But it has nearly no content. It also has the identical illustration whose cleverness led me to vote Keep on [[Half]] when it was VFD'd [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive276#Half|last month]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
*''Barely any content?'' It's an article about '''two'''! What more content could it possibly have? --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 17:17, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
**Twice as much. (Rimshot) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:35 26 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Symbol}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Awful, not funny, random. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sir will add his vote here, my good man. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:49 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete|Paid by page count.}} Author makes it clear from the start that he has nothing to say, and that that will not stop him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:46 22-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:06, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit ''à la'' "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
  +
*Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  +
*EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::Okay, great! I'll just finish my [[Sex change]] and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
:::Thanks a lot! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDn|Can I borrow 5 bucks?}}==
+
== {{VFDn|The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog}} ==
{{VFDg|time=08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
#<s>I like it. But it will do with more images. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Not funny. Un-encyclopedic. Second person narrative. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:19 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#Borderline. See comments. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ok, it actually is not that good, and the last comments convinced me. I liked the image part. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} No.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:48, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
* First read through put it on the borderline. Second read through and it's a weak attempt. Just not funny enough to warrant it's inclusion as a non-encyclopaedic article, and it doesn't quite fit into any other namespace. A decent rewrite and it could become a “HowTo:Borrow five bucks”, or maybe “UnScripts:That guy you once knew”. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
   
=={{VFDn|6 (number)}}==
+
{{VFDt|time=19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDg|time=08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic. Not funny. Boring. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absurdly long anything is now a trite old joke. Using {{Tag|math}} to write 6 in the most complicated way possible, and then repeating it 22 times, is just self-congratulation. Ten initial quotations, four of them of the bickering-quotation variety, citing ''The Prisoner.'' A tiny bit of humor, repeated ''ad nauseam'' to avoid confusion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:24 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} removed the horrific &lt;math> aspect, but still sucks. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:54 24 Oct 2013}}
 
#Bad. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:25, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Reads like a list without the bullet points. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:44, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Seven (number)}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Random, memish, not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I looked up the number seven but the first sentence tells me I'm going to be reading about "the Garfish tribe of half-fish people." And the rest of the article is Wacky Religion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Completely disagree with the above rationales. The wacky religion angle is a good way to work with a very limited topic. What kills this is lack of cohesive nonsense - random humour works best when there is an inherit illogical logic, like a Douglas Adams book. Add to that poor spelling, grammar, formatting, and lack of images. Something more like [[crossbow]] would work - this doesn't. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:27 29 Oct 2013}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|:Category:Things that you can sing to the tune of In the Hall of the Mountain King}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Seems like a kind of nit-picking category Wikipedia would have, and me thinks we should keep most of these for the smiles. It can be expanded on the Category page, as I did with the category 'People who didn't fuck your mother in the kitchen last night' after Msnbc tried repeatedly to kill it (murderer!). But this one could be more selective on what it's put on. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 10:53 25-10-'13
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Can't be used to find articles through it. Used in random articles that have nothing to do with the Hall of the Mountain King. --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Aye; trade to Illogicopedia for future draft picks. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:31 24-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A nice idea, but unfinished. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
 
#{{Comment}} These titles have one thing in common: They have 7 syllables, which *could* correspond to the first 7 notes of Hall of the Mountain King. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 03:21, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|;}} (aka [[Semicolon]])==
 
{{VFDt|time=13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Have added some stuff, including a 'Popular Culture' section which could be expanded. I hate to see any of these articles about "things on a keyboard" go the way of all flesh. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 25-10
+
#{{Keep}} The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:29 14-Jul-15</small>
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} So short, practically pointless. Filler article with no humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Untrue ≠ funny. "It is much cooler than it's [sic] brother" isn't either. Deleting this will free up the space for something good. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 25-Oct-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* How can someone write about the anal orifice of a truck so poorly? Reserving vote to see if Al comes back to it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:39 29 Oct 2013}}
 
*:Because of your sick comment I went back there, but please don't make me do it again, it's dark and the noises unnerve me. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] coming back from hell itself
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDn|Visual kei}}==
+
== {{VFDn|SGML}} ==
{{VFDg|time=14:10, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gigantic article on a Japanese music genre, obviously created by Japanese who aren't good at English and don't realize this is a humor wiki, for the primary purpose of documenting and gathering interest to the subject. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:10 25-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. Heavy use of [[Capitalism: in grammar]] THERE which adds an un-encyclopedic nature. Also it is not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 14:17, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} It reads better in the original Russian. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:48 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} "Musical Phagocterstics". Say No More! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:45, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't vote to delete until I've read the whole thing, and this was a very long and unhumorous read. I checked the Wikipedia article, and a good portion of the article is sporked, except where it concerns individual bands. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:27, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Until today, there were a large number of links to YouTube, and footnotes, including one referenced from all over that read, "Saddly, this is True." That (spelling, syntax, and lack of humor) are all the problems summed up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:13 25-Oct-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== {{VFDn|A newt wizard did it}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
{{VFDt|time=12:45, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete}} Last one of the mashed up wizards doing it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} Uncyclopedians basing articles not on real-world "encyclopedia" reality but on other Uncyclopedia articles are writing to themselves and showing contempt for our readers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 28-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
#This joke stopped being funny the moment someone decided to create 500 articles on it {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 23:40, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
#The image is worth keeping, though. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:25, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep}} Each in-joke has its bastard children, and they, together, create a mosaic of the overall in-joke. And if you took this one out mnnbvvccxz would have your throat in his hands and apply the pressure. I was never into the Newt in-joke, but some people are. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 28-10
+
#{{Keep}} [[WP:SuicideGirls|SuicideGirls]] seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Keep}} Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* Just for those that are concerned, I'm only nominating mashed up in-jokes. You may notice [[Butt poop]], [[Grue]], and [[A wizard did it]] haven't been nominated, just the mash-up in-jokes. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
+
*'''Renamed.''' Used to be [[Suicide Girl Markup Language]], but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|The "No Cajek Allowed"'s of Uncyclopedia}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=17:56, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=4
+
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#A mixture of in-jokes. Grue, Cajek, trite jokes about Japan and bad prose, stolen from another article ([[The "No Gaijin Allowed"'s of Japan]]). {{User:Anton199/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} An archetypal in-joke, a parody of a niche article on a parody website. Target audience might be 3 people, none of whom are still here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 31-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
#:Sorry for not putting it the right way. It is just that I used the tag system and the article got placed here automatically. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:16, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Nativitism. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:23 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#Redundo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:50, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Write a HowTo that will get featured}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}} ==
   
{{VFDg|time=19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=17:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=6
+
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Rather old and has not been improved on since several months ago. There is some concept but this is probably the same one as of [[HowTo:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia]] and maybe [[HowTo:Write an average Uncyclopedia article]], but with the worse prose, less worked out structure and a title that is not justified (the author does not even talk about writing HowTos, he comes back to it but is still always off-topic). For those who may say that it still has some humour, I provided the above two links: these two articles serve for the same purpose but are funnier. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:24, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:30 28-Jul-15</small>
#{{Delete}} The author is the nominator. The article is a cheap imitation. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 31-Oct-13</small>
+
|keepnumber=1
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 12:08, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Author request. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ditto. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:51, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sorry but [[HowTo talk:Write a HowTo that will get featured|this]] says all. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*ScottPat reviewed it a while ago and I apologize to him for making his efforts pointless, but the author himself did not take these comments into account. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
* I don't think this is a deleteable article based upon merit, but I support the author's right to request deletion. I'd recommend that it be added to QVFD rather than putting it to the vote, if that's what the author wants. If it were mine, and I didn't feel it had enough merit to survive, I'd be inclined to move it to my user space though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:21 01 Nov 2013}}
 
**I did not think I could QVFD it, especially because of Scott's review. And what I move to my user space, is something I would like to keep. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
***I think it's worth keeping. Far better than [[Worst 100 Ways To Be Castrated]] or [[Carebear]], which are two of my earliest attempts. But in respect of your right to delete your own work - and only because of that - I will vote to delete. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
****Thanks. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:13, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Cat Nation}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Octavarium}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=22:12, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=11:54, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Make it go where Kittenolivia went, and for the same reason. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:12 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Mostly a fanboy review of a single, obscure prog-rock album, written in code that can only be decoded by insiders and roadies. Several generations of Admins have tried to get rid of it using tags. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>11:54 1-Aug-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
Line 104: Line 105:
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Catspace}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Bones K. McMillington}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=22:16, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=12:21, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Another fictional-country (this time, universe) article formerly found on [[:Template:Latin America]]; a merger of Randumbo, cuteness, and memes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:16 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Found on [[Special:LonelyPages]]. Whimsical essay is not encyclopedic and not very funny. The word "McMillington" does not occur anywhere in Wikipedia, and Google bounces right back here. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:21 1-Aug-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* For those interested in the history of this, it was previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive179|voted kept 5-3]] in March 2009. No real rationale except "there is a lot worse" {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:45 01 Nov 2013}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Invisia}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|King Harkinian}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=23:35, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=21:18, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
|delete=
+
|delete=#{{Delete}} The thing about characters like these is that they're one-note. The King's gimmick is that he says things like "dinner" or "mah boi" in a hammy way, nothing really more to it. I think the short descriptions on the "Characters" sections in ''[[Link: The Faces of Evil]]'' and ''[[Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon]]'' is good enough on its own.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:18, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} It's not about anything and no one is ever going to look it up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:35 1-Nov-13</small>
+
|keepnumber=0
+
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} I disagree with [[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]]'s assessment of King Harkinian's character. While it is true that in games he is restricted to a minor role in some forgettable CD-i games, he has gone on to become famous in the YouTube Poop community, where he has far more significance. People will see him in many classic video remixes and want to look him up. (On that note, the article should perhaps be edited to more accurately reflect that.) {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:51, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 23:51, August 1, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit HowTo:Get Expelled from School H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 520 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote A load of poopy. Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:50 11-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--EStop (talk) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pupil misbehavior can be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. Simsilikesims (talk) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

edit Redirect H T D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 442 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit à la "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  • Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  • EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, great! I'll just finish my Sex change and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--EStop (talk) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

edit The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 442 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A nice idea, but unfinished. --EStop (talk) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:29 14-Jul-15
Comments

edit SGML H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 306 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. SuicideGirls seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--EStop (talk) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Renamed. Used to be Suicide Girl Markup Language, but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 176 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15

edit Exploding Testicles H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 108 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:30 28-Jul-15
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit Octavarium H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 17 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Mostly a fanboy review of a single, obscure prog-rock album, written in code that can only be decoded by insiders and roadies. Several generations of Admins have tried to get rid of it using tags. Spıke Radiomicrophone11:54 1-Aug-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Bones K. McMillington H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 17 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Found on Special:LonelyPages. Whimsical essay is not encyclopedic and not very funny. The word "McMillington" does not occur anywhere in Wikipedia, and Google bounces right back here. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:21 1-Aug-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit King Harkinian H T D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 8 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The thing about characters like these is that they're one-note. The King's gimmick is that he says things like "dinner" or "mah boi" in a hammy way, nothing really more to it. I think the short descriptions on the "Characters" sections in Link: The Faces of Evil and Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon is good enough on its own.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:18, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I disagree with EpicWinner's assessment of King Harkinian's character. While it is true that in games he is restricted to a minor role in some forgettable CD-i games, he has gone on to become famous in the YouTube Poop community, where he has far more significance. People will see him in many classic video remixes and want to look him up. (On that note, the article should perhaps be edited to more accurately reflect that.) Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:51, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects