Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDn|2 (number)}})
(HowTo:**** your Friend's Sister(s) And Get Away With It: Archive.)
 
(5,197 intermediate revisions by 95 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=={{VFDn|Wikipedia (movie)}}==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
{{VFDt|time=11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#Lists. Not original. 11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC) {{User:Anton199/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} Might have been funny in 2005; see also '''Comments''' below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Badder. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
*Wacky Wiki War! I deleted the dumb lists of memes, but that doesn't leave much. Intro tries to morph Wikipedia into a movie in the right way: by misusing actual Wikipedia catch-phrases. Unfortunately, it doesn't use them in a way that has any special meaning. That would be clever. It seems there are two sequels? Together, would they make one good article? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:44 20-Oct-13</small>
 
**They would, if they existed. But the author just put links to non-existent articles on Wikipedia itself. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
**:How helpful of him! Thanks for deleting them. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:43 20-Oct-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== {{VFDn|Bork}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDt|time=10:15, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} "A communist language originating in the country of reds," about which all we can say is that Scandinavian languages look funny as they are very foreign; also, lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:15 21-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:04, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
#{{Delete}} Bad. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} At least from the main space.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 10:22, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't want to worry about wiping this entirely, just maintaining this article. Maybe if the time this article is about to get deleted, maybe redirect it to [[Swedish Chef]] and explain a little of it there? {{User:Newman66/sig}} 01:39, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Wilford "God" Brimley}} ==
 
{{VFDt|time=10:27, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Wilford Brimley is one of the minor memes on the website, and this article is for people who wanted him to be a religion — without doing the least to cleverly show how the real Brimley might resemble a religion. Even the "Holy Document" in the style of Brimley himself swings-and-misses at comedy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:08, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{delete|Can't survive as is.}} If someone had the energy to rework some of the better material into [[Wilford Brimley]] we might be able to salvage some of it, but not enough to survive as a page on it's own. [[Wilford Brimley]] is better, but still short of being good. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:00 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}}Unnecessary spawn of a not too interesting original. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} This doesn't seem to be that bad, but it may need some improvement or salvaging. When it gets <s>improved</s> deleted, it can be moved or redirected back to Wilford Brimley. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 12:47, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:No, it can't; there is already an article at [[Wilford Brimley]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:06 21-Oct-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|2 (number)}} ==
 
{{VFDt|time=20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't think it could be featured or anything of this kind, but contains some great jokes. I especially liked fake scientific bits, such as "2+2 approaches infinity for very large values of 2." {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:22, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#The ghost of Chronarion urged me to vote for this. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] today
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Barely any content. Un-encyclopedic and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Barely any content — a list of quips and a reused illustration. Redirect to [[Half]] (see '''Comments''' below) and redirect the 2 key on the keyboard template as well. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Twice as crap as it could be. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:57 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#'''Delete''' {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 11:19, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*Perhaps a necessary article waiting for a re-write? I can't think of any ideas though. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:It was created by {{U|Chronarion}} at the very start of Uncyclopedia in 2005. But it has nearly no content. It also has the identical illustration whose cleverness led me to vote Keep on [[Half]] when it was VFD'd [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive276#Half|last month]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
*''Barely any content?'' It's an article about '''two'''! What more content could it possibly have? --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 17:17, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
**Twice as much. (Rimshot) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:35 26 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Symbol}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Awful, not funny, random. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sir will add his vote here, my good man. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:49 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete|Paid by page count.}} Author makes it clear from the start that he has nothing to say, and that that will not stop him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:46 22-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:06, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
  +
:Perhaps just move it the writer's user space and leave it there. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:24, August 11, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDn|Can I borrow 5 bucks?}}==
+
== {{VFDn|Bones K. McMillington}} ==
{{VFDg|time=08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
#<s>I like it. But it will do with more images. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Not funny. Un-encyclopedic. Second person narrative. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:19 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#Borderline. See comments. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ok, it actually is not that good, and the last comments convinced me. I liked the image part. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} No.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:48, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
* First read through put it on the borderline. Second read through and it's a weak attempt. Just not funny enough to warrant it's inclusion as a non-encyclopaedic article, and it doesn't quite fit into any other namespace. A decent rewrite and it could become a “HowTo:Borrow five bucks”, or maybe “UnScripts:That guy you once knew”. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
   
=={{VFDn|6 (number)}}==
+
{{VFDt|time=12:21, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
{{VFDg|time=08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic. Not funny. Boring. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absurdly long anything is now a trite old joke. Using {{Tag|math}} to write 6 in the most complicated way possible, and then repeating it 22 times, is just self-congratulation. Ten initial quotations, four of them of the bickering-quotation variety, citing ''The Prisoner.'' A tiny bit of humor, repeated ''ad nauseam'' to avoid confusion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:24 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} removed the horrific &lt;math> aspect, but still sucks. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:54 24 Oct 2013}}
 
#Bad. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:25, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Reads like a list without the bullet points. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:44, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Seven (number)}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{Delete}} Random, memish, not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I looked up the number seven but the first sentence tells me I'm going to be reading about "the Garfish tribe of half-fish people." And the rest of the article is Wacky Religion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Completely disagree with the above rationales. The wacky religion angle is a good way to work with a very limited topic. What kills this is lack of cohesive nonsense - random humour works best when there is an inherit illogical logic, like a Douglas Adams book. Add to that poor spelling, grammar, formatting, and lack of images. Something more like [[crossbow]] would work - this doesn't. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:27 29 Oct 2013}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|:Category:Things that you can sing to the tune of In the Hall of the Mountain King}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Seems like a kind of nit-picking category Wikipedia would have, and me thinks we should keep most of these for the smiles. It can be expanded on the Category page, as I did with the category 'People who didn't fuck your mother in the kitchen last night' after Msnbc tried repeatedly to kill it (murderer!). But this one could be more selective on what it's put on. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 10:53 25-10-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Can't be used to find articles through it. Used in random articles that have nothing to do with the Hall of the Mountain King. --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Found on [[Special:LonelyPages]]. Whimsical essay is not encyclopedic and not very funny. The word "McMillington" does not occur anywhere in Wikipedia, and Google bounces right back here. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:21 1-Aug-15</small>
#{{Delete}} Aye; trade to Illogicopedia for future draft picks. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:31 24-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Won't be found, won't be search for. Redundo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:04, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Writing a formal biography of a well known skeleton from film or natural history, instead of the discoveries that transpired because of it, seems a good comedy concept if both could be mashed. It needed a better hook, then taken from there. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 11:09, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Comment}} These titles have one thing in common: They have 7 syllables, which *could* correspond to the first 7 notes of Hall of the Mountain King. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 03:21, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|;}} (aka [[Semicolon]])==
 
{{VFDt|time=13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Have added some stuff, including a 'Popular Culture' section which could be expanded. I hate to see any of these articles about "things on a keyboard" go the way of all flesh. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 25-10
+
#{{Keep}} This entry into our large encyclopedia is a fine example of the artform.--[[User:SketchSlayer|SketchSlayer]]([[User talk:SketchSlayer|talk]]) 9:51, August 21, 2015 (gmt+12)
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} So short, practically pointless. Filler article with no humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Untrue ≠ funny. "It is much cooler than it's [sic] brother" isn't either. Deleting this will free up the space for something good. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 25-Oct-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* How can someone write about the anal orifice of a truck so poorly? Reserving vote to see if Al comes back to it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:39 29 Oct 2013}}
+
*The article appears to be wound round an image I found for illustrating the [[Liberal Party of Great Britain]]. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:13, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
*:Because of your sick comment I went back there, but please don't make me do it again, it's dark and the noises unnerve me. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] coming back from hell itself
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDn|Visual kei}}==
+
== {{VFDn|Bielefeld}} ==
{{VFDg|time=14:10, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gigantic article on a Japanese music genre, obviously created by Japanese who aren't good at English and don't realize this is a humor wiki, for the primary purpose of documenting and gathering interest to the subject. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:10 25-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. Heavy use of [[Capitalism: in grammar]] THERE which adds an un-encyclopedic nature. Also it is not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 14:17, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} It reads better in the original Russian. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:48 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} "Musical Phagocterstics". Say No More! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:45, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't vote to delete until I've read the whole thing, and this was a very long and unhumorous read. I checked the Wikipedia article, and a good portion of the article is sporked, except where it concerns individual bands. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:27, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Until today, there were a large number of links to YouTube, and footnotes, including one referenced from all over that read, "Saddly, this is True." That (spelling, syntax, and lack of humor) are all the problems summed up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:13 25-Oct-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|A newt wizard did it}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=12:45, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete}} Last one of the mashed up wizards doing it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} Uncyclopedians basing articles not on real-world "encyclopedia" reality but on other Uncyclopedia articles are writing to themselves and showing contempt for our readers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 28-Oct-13</small>
 
#This joke stopped being funny the moment someone decided to create 500 articles on it {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 23:40, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
#The image is worth keeping, though. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:25, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{keep}} Each in-joke has its bastard children, and they, together, create a mosaic of the overall in-joke. And if you took this one out mnnbvvccxz would have your throat in his hands and apply the pressure. I was never into the Newt in-joke, but some people are. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 28-10
 
|comments=
 
* Just for those that are concerned, I'm only nominating mashed up in-jokes. You may notice [[Butt poop]], [[Grue]], and [[A wizard did it]] haven't been nominated, just the mash-up in-jokes. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|The "No Cajek Allowed"'s of Uncyclopedia}} ==
 
   
{{VFDt|time=17:56, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=00:21, August 10, 2015 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#A mixture of in-jokes. Grue, Cajek, trite jokes about Japan and bad prose, stolen from another article ([[The "No Gaijin Allowed"'s of Japan]]). {{User:Anton199/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} After removing everything meant simply to direct the reader to several external websites including one in English, what's left is drivel. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:21 10-Aug-15</small>
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} An archetypal in-joke, a parody of a niche article on a parody website. Target audience might be 3 people, none of whom are still here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 31-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} About as bad as the Wacky War stuff. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:05, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
#:Sorry for not putting it the right way. It is just that I used the tag system and the article got placed here automatically. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:16, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:58, August 15, 2015 (UTC)
#Nativitism. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:23 01 Nov 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} Too silly, too short. The Bush-related humor also dates it. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 04:31, August 31, 2015 (UTC)
#Redundo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:50, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
Line 68: Line 53:
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Write a HowTo that will get featured}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Catrina}} ==
   
{{VFDg|time=19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=14:01, August 13, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=6
+
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Rather old and has not been improved on since several months ago. There is some concept but this is probably the same one as of [[HowTo:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia]] and maybe [[HowTo:Write an average Uncyclopedia article]], but with the worse prose, less worked out structure and a title that is not justified (the author does not even talk about writing HowTos, he comes back to it but is still always off-topic). For those who may say that it still has some humour, I provided the above two links: these two articles serve for the same purpose but are funnier. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:24, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Apart from a ranty Intro, this is a catalog of news articles and opinion pieces on [[Hurricane Katrina]]. Not what we do here. Also: Unfunny. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:01 13-Aug-15</small>
#{{Delete}} The author is the nominator. The article is a cheap imitation. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 31-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Concur. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:55, August 15, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 12:08, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Pants approach. --[[Image:Laurels.gif|15px]]''[[User:Romartus|<span style=color:#66023C><big>'''R'''</big>om'''A'''rtus<big>*</big><big>'''I'''</big>m<big>'''p'''</big>era'''t'''or '''ITRA''' </span>]]''<small> ([[User talk:Romartus|<span style=color:#66023C>Orate</span>]])</small> [[User:Romartus/Triumphs|<span style=color:#66023C><big> '''®''' </big></span>]] 22:28, August 24, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Author request. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ditto. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:51, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sorry but [[HowTo talk:Write a HowTo that will get featured|this]] says all. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*ScottPat reviewed it a while ago and I apologize to him for making his efforts pointless, but the author himself did not take these comments into account. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
* I don't think this is a deleteable article based upon merit, but I support the author's right to request deletion. I'd recommend that it be added to QVFD rather than putting it to the vote, if that's what the author wants. If it were mine, and I didn't feel it had enough merit to survive, I'd be inclined to move it to my user space though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:21 01 Nov 2013}}
 
**I did not think I could QVFD it, especially because of Scott's review. And what I move to my user space, is something I would like to keep. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
***I think it's worth keeping. Far better than [[Worst 100 Ways To Be Castrated]] or [[Carebear]], which are two of my earliest attempts. But in respect of your right to delete your own work - and only because of that - I will vote to delete. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
****Thanks. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:13, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Cat Nation}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Mac OS Y}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=22:12, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=01:23, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
+
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Make it go where Kittenolivia went, and for the same reason. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:12 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} But while we're cleaning up templates, this 2005 article about a nonexistent Apple operating system is equally crufty. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>01:23 17-Aug-15</small>
  +
#{{Kill}} Scruffy nonsense such as 'Mac OSY will be released at the end of time'. Not funny, did not make me laugh. --[[User:TotalCuddles02|TotalCuddles02]] ([[User talk:TotalCuddles02|talk]]) 01:52, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} If the subject doesn't exist, the article ought to be especially funny, well written and still have a link to the real world, or no one will read it anyway. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 10:02, August 20, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
Line 97: Line 77:
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|Catspace}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|VBulletin}} ==
   
{{VFDt|time=22:16, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=22:18, August 21, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
+
|delnumber=4
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Another fictional-country (this time, universe) article formerly found on [[:Template:Latin America]]; a merger of Randumbo, cuteness, and memes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:16 1-Nov-13</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
* For those interested in the history of this, it was previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive179|voted kept 5-3]] in March 2009. No real rationale except "there is a lot worse" {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:45 01 Nov 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Invisia}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=23:35, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It's not about anything and no one is ever going to look it up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:35 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Kill}} Unnotable software, no edits since 2010 besides my edits, only 1 picture (the vBulletin logo), and a bunch of crummy nonsense which is mostly not funny and quite stupid. This can't stay. --[[User:TotalCuddles02|TotalCuddles02]] ([[User talk:TotalCuddles02|talk]]) 22:18, August 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} On the site since 2005. No comedy theme. (Even the Wikipedia article veers between salesmanship in the future tense, reporting on states-of-mind, and user grievances.) <span style="{{LinearGradient|-45deg|navy|blue|navy}} -moz-border-radius: 3px; border-radius: 3px; border: 1px solid yellow; white-space: nowrap">[[User:Spike|<span style="color:yellow; font-family: Cambria, Palatino, serif">Sp&#305;ke</span>]] [[File:Radiomicrophone.gif|18px|link=User_talk:Spike]]</span><small>22:28 21-Aug-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:28, August 22, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} This actually is (was?) widely-used forum software, but doesn't change the fact that the article sucks. It's very short, and complains about the cost of the software when it's not making crummy jokes. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 04:27, August 31, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=

Latest revision as of 10:20, August 31, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 876 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. At least from the main space.--EStop (talk) 10:22, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Perhaps just move it the writer's user space and leave it there. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:24, August 11, 2015 (UTC)

edit Bones K. McMillington H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 717 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Found on Special:LonelyPages. Whimsical essay is not encyclopedic and not very funny. The word "McMillington" does not occur anywhere in Wikipedia, and Google bounces right back here. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:21 1-Aug-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Won't be found, won't be search for. Redundo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:04, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Writing a formal biography of a well known skeleton from film or natural history, instead of the discoveries that transpired because of it, seems a good comedy concept if both could be mashed. It needed a better hook, then taken from there. --EStop (talk) 11:09, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. This entry into our large encyclopedia is a fine example of the artform.--SketchSlayer(talk) 9:51, August 21, 2015 (gmt+12)
Comments

edit Bielefeld H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 513 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. After removing everything meant simply to direct the reader to several external websites including one in English, what's left is drivel. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:21 10-Aug-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. About as bad as the Wacky War stuff. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:05, August 12, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 19:58, August 15, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Too silly, too short. The Bush-related humor also dates it. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 04:31, August 31, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Catrina H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 428 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Apart from a ranty Intro, this is a catalog of news articles and opinion pieces on Hurricane Katrina. Not what we do here. Also: Unfunny. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:01 13-Aug-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Concur. --EStop (talk) 19:55, August 15, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pants approach. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:28, August 24, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Mac OS Y H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 344 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. But while we're cleaning up templates, this 2005 article about a nonexistent Apple operating system is equally crufty. Spıke Radiomicrophone01:23 17-Aug-15
  2. Symbol kill vote Kill. Scruffy nonsense such as 'Mac OSY will be released at the end of time'. Not funny, did not make me laugh. --TotalCuddles02 (talk) 01:52, August 17, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. If the subject doesn't exist, the article ought to be especially funny, well written and still have a link to the real world, or no one will read it anyway. --EStop (talk) 10:02, August 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit VBulletin H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 228 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol kill vote Kill. Unnotable software, no edits since 2010 besides my edits, only 1 picture (the vBulletin logo), and a bunch of crummy nonsense which is mostly not funny and quite stupid. This can't stay. --TotalCuddles02 (talk) 22:18, August 21, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. On the site since 2005. No comedy theme. (Even the Wikipedia article veers between salesmanship in the future tense, reporting on states-of-mind, and user grievances.) Spıke Radiomicrophone22:28 21-Aug-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 09:28, August 22, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. This actually is (was?) widely-used forum software, but doesn't change the fact that the article sucks. It's very short, and complains about the cost of the software when it's not making crummy jokes. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 04:27, August 31, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects