Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDn|2 (number)}})
({{VFDn|Vietnamese}})
 
(4,138 intermediate revisions by 70 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
 
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=={{VFDn|Wikipedia (movie)}}==
+
== {{VFDn|Anarcho-fascism}} ==
{{VFDt|time=11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#Lists. Not original. 11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC) {{User:Anton199/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} Might have been funny in 2005; see also '''Comments''' below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Badder. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
*Wacky Wiki War! I deleted the dumb lists of memes, but that doesn't leave much. Intro tries to morph Wikipedia into a movie in the right way: by misusing actual Wikipedia catch-phrases. Unfortunately, it doesn't use them in a way that has any special meaning. That would be clever. It seems there are two sequels? Together, would they make one good article? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:44 20-Oct-13</small>
 
**They would, if they existed. But the author just put links to non-existent articles on Wikipedia itself. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
**:How helpful of him! Thanks for deleting them. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:43 20-Oct-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Bork}} ==
 
{{VFDt|time=10:15, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} "A communist language originating in the country of reds," about which all we can say is that Scandinavian languages look funny as they are very foreign; also, lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:15 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:04, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Bad. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:15 22 Oct 2013}}
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't want to worry about wiping this entirely, just maintaining this article. Maybe if the time this article is about to get deleted, maybe redirect it to [[Swedish Chef]] and explain a little of it there? {{User:Newman66/sig}} 01:39, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== {{VFDn|Wilford "God" Brimley}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:20, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
{{VFDt|time=10:27, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Wilford Brimley is one of the minor memes on the website, and this article is for people who wanted him to be a religion without doing the least to cleverly show how the real Brimley might resemble a religion. Even the "Holy Document" in the style of Brimley himself swings-and-misses at comedy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 21-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} It has it all: A tedious read without photos, hard to tell whether author is an ideologue or is ridiculing ideologues, had links to Facebook and YouTube apparently to hump an internet meme (until I deleted them), and is full of encyclopedia cliches. (Check out Section 2: "Other critics may have alleged....Many believe....It has been suggested....But clearly it is very likely possible...Legend has it..." Utterly not worth streamlining. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:20 13-Nov-14</small>
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:08, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The intro is supposed to lure the reader in to the rest of the article. Here, the intro is literally factual, and the rest of it I can't tell if it's trying to be funny or just as factual. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:25, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
#{{delete|Can't survive as is.}} If someone had the energy to rework some of the better material into [[Wilford Brimley]] we might be able to salvage some of it, but not enough to survive as a page on it's own. [[Wilford Brimley]] is better, but still short of being good. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:00 22 Oct 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} Incoherent. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 08:06, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}}Unnecessary spawn of a not too interesting original. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Whatever. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141117171427}}
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} This doesn't seem to be that bad, but it may need some improvement or salvaging. When it gets <s>improved</s> deleted, it can be moved or redirected back to Wilford Brimley. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 12:47, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:No, it can't; there is already an article at [[Wilford Brimley]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:06 21-Oct-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|2 (number)}} ==
 
{{VFDt|time=20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Don't think it could be featured or anything of this kind, but contains some great jokes. I especially liked fake scientific bits, such as "2+2 approaches infinity for very large values of 2." {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:22, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#The ghost of Chronarion urged me to vote for this. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] today
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Barely any content. Un-encyclopedic and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Barely any content — a list of quips and a reused illustration. Redirect to [[Half]] (see '''Comments''' below) and redirect the 2 key on the keyboard template as well. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Twice as crap as it could be. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:57 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#'''Delete''' {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 11:19, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*Perhaps a necessary article waiting for a re-write? I can't think of any ideas though. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:It was created by {{U|Chronarion}} at the very start of Uncyclopedia in 2005. But it has nearly no content. It also has the identical illustration whose cleverness led me to vote Keep on [[Half]] when it was VFD'd [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive276#Half|last month]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:42 21-Oct-13</small>
 
*''Barely any content?'' It's an article about '''two'''! What more content could it possibly have? --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 17:17, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
**Twice as much. (Rimshot) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:35 26 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Symbol}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Awful, not funny, random. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sir will add his vote here, my good man. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:49 22 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete|Paid by page count.}} Author makes it clear from the start that he has nothing to say, and that that will not stop him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:46 22-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:06, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Despite my warning, Llwy-ar-lawr has been trying to streamline this. But what you wind up with is an "ism" whose only humor is its impossibility — that is, the fact that it is a page no one will look up — unless you came here from Facebook etc. to see if there is an article on this offsite meme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:35 14-Nov-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDn|Can I borrow 5 bucks?}}==
+
== {{VFDc|Crimethink}} ==
{{VFDg|time=08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
#<s>I like it. But it will do with more images. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Not funny. Un-encyclopedic. Second person narrative. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:19 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#Borderline. See comments. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ok, it actually is not that good, and the last comments convinced me. I liked the image part. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} No.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:48, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
* First read through put it on the borderline. Second read through and it's a weak attempt. Just not funny enough to warrant it's inclusion as a non-encyclopaedic article, and it doesn't quite fit into any other namespace. A decent rewrite and it could become a “HowTo:Borrow five bucks”, or maybe “UnScripts:That guy you once knew”. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:21 29 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
   
=={{VFDn|6 (number)}}==
+
{{VFDg|time=00:06, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
{{VFDg|time=08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic. Not funny. Boring. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absurdly long anything is now a trite old joke. Using {{Tag|math}} to write 6 in the most complicated way possible, and then repeating it 22 times, is just self-congratulation. Ten initial quotations, four of them of the bickering-quotation variety, citing ''The Prisoner.'' A tiny bit of humor, repeated ''ad nauseam'' to avoid confusion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:24 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} removed the horrific &lt;math> aspect, but still sucks. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:54 24 Oct 2013}}
 
#Bad. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:25, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Reads like a list without the bullet points. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:44, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|Seven (number)}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{Delete}} Random, memish, not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I looked up the number seven but the first sentence tells me I'm going to be reading about "the Garfish tribe of half-fish people." And the rest of the article is Wacky Religion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:27 24-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} Completely disagree with the above rationales. The wacky religion angle is a good way to work with a very limited topic. What kills this is lack of cohesive nonsense - random humour works best when there is an inherit illogical logic, like a Douglas Adams book. Add to that poor spelling, grammar, formatting, and lack of images. Something more like [[crossbow]] would work - this doesn't. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:27 29 Oct 2013}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDn|:Category:Things that you can sing to the tune of In the Hall of the Mountain King}}==
 
{{VFDt|time=16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} Seems like a kind of nit-picking category Wikipedia would have, and me thinks we should keep most of these for the smiles. It can be expanded on the Category page, as I did with the category 'People who didn't fuck your mother in the kitchen last night' after Msnbc tried repeatedly to kill it (murderer!). But this one could be more selective on what it's put on. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 10:53 25-10-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Can't be used to find articles through it. Used in random articles that have nothing to do with the Hall of the Mountain King. --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 16:21, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|Foreign-language humor.}} This article is a study in writing a page in the style of the novel ''1984'' but not in writing any original comedy. Intro also instructs other Uncyclopedians in the supposed proper use of the templates author created (and {{U|Anton199}} has revised). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:06 16-Nov-14</small>
#{{Delete}} Aye; trade to Illogicopedia for future draft picks. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:31 24-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Send it to Room 101. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:22, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#What's this, an attempt at summarising ''1984'' in Newspeak? I'm not seeing the humour. The only funny thing on this page, IMHO, is [[:File:Unbook.jpg]]. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141117172810}}
#{{Comment}} These titles have one thing in common: They have 7 syllables, which *could* correspond to the first 7 notes of Hall of the Mountain King. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 03:21, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
*<s>{{Delete}} Reading this hurts my head. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 08:08, November 16, 2014 (UTC)</s>
}}
+
|keepnumber=2
 
=={{VFDn|;}} (aka [[Semicolon]])==
 
{{VFDt|time=13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Have added some stuff, including a 'Popular Culture' section which could be expanded. I hate to see any of these articles about "things on a keyboard" go the way of all flesh. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 25-10
+
#{{Keep}} On second thought, it isn't that bad. You just have to get into it, and Anton is right. The better stuff comes later. Perhaps, it could use a thorough editing and some rewriting but not deletion. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 17:54, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
|delnumber=2
+
#:The article is unreadable. It's the same as the Pig Latin article that was on VFD just a while back - the humour is just the fact that it's unreadable. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 10:24, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=#{{Delete}} So short, practically pointless. Filler article with no humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:18, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
#::Oh? I can read it. If the problem is that you can't read it, I could provide a translated version as I did before. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141118144602}}
#{{Delete}} Untrue ≠ funny. "It is much cooler than it's [sic] brother" isn't either. Deleting this will free up the space for something good. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 25-Oct-13</small>
+
#:::The problem is not that the obstacle is insurmountable. The problem is that the article is all about its own obstacle. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:29 18-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Keep}} Political/social parody/satire is also funny. I think whomever wrote it did a very good job. It's along the lines of the [[Captain's Log]] article which is clearly derived and emulating a specific source but does definitely appeal to those who enjoy that source. [[User:Begege|Begege]] ([[User talk:Begege|talk]]) 04:37, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* How can someone write about the anal orifice of a truck so poorly? Reserving vote to see if Al comes back to it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:39 29 Oct 2013}}
+
*It's pretty funny at some points. Just read it for long enough. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:48, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
*:Because of your sick comment I went back there, but please don't make me do it again, it's dark and the noises unnerve me. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] coming back from hell itself
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDn|Visual kei}}==
+
== {{VFDn|About}} ==
{{VFDg|time=14:10, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gigantic article on a Japanese music genre, obviously created by Japanese who aren't good at English and don't realize this is a humor wiki, for the primary purpose of documenting and gathering interest to the subject. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:10 25-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. Heavy use of [[Capitalism: in grammar]] THERE which adds an un-encyclopedic nature. Also it is not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 14:17, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} It reads better in the original Russian. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:48 29 Oct 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} "Musical Phagocterstics". Say No More! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:45, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't vote to delete until I've read the whole thing, and this was a very long and unhumorous read. I checked the Wikipedia article, and a good portion of the article is sporked, except where it concerns individual bands. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:27, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Until today, there were a large number of links to YouTube, and footnotes, including one referenced from all over that read, "Saddly, this is True." That (spelling, syntax, and lack of humor) are all the problems summed up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:13 25-Oct-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|A newt wizard did it}} ==
 
   
{{VFDt|time=12:45, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=20:26, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete}} Last one of the mashed up wizards doing it. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
+
# {{Delete}} Seriously? Spouting random gibberish isn't humour. {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 20:26, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} Uncyclopedians basing articles not on real-world "encyclopedia" reality but on other Uncyclopedia articles are writing to themselves and showing contempt for our readers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 28-Oct-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A lot of word-association, sometimes descending into numb lists, with no theme holding it together. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:30 17-Nov-14</small>
#This joke stopped being funny the moment someone decided to create 500 articles on it {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 23:40, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Was there a point here? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141118014318}}
#The image is worth keeping, though. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:25, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Pretty stupid. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 04:59, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{keep}} Each in-joke has its bastard children, and they, together, create a mosaic of the overall in-joke. And if you took this one out mnnbvvccxz would have your throat in his hands and apply the pressure. I was never into the Newt in-joke, but some people are. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 28-10
 
|comments=
 
* Just for those that are concerned, I'm only nominating mashed up in-jokes. You may notice [[Butt poop]], [[Grue]], and [[A wizard did it]] haven't been nominated, just the mash-up in-jokes. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:45 28 Oct 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|The "No Cajek Allowed"'s of Uncyclopedia}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=17:56, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#A mixture of in-jokes. Grue, Cajek, trite jokes about Japan and bad prose, stolen from another article ([[The "No Gaijin Allowed"'s of Japan]]). {{User:Anton199/sig}}
 
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} An archetypal in-joke, a parody of a niche article on a parody website. Target audience might be 3 people, none of whom are still here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 31-Oct-13</small>
 
#:Sorry for not putting it the right way. It is just that I used the tag system and the article got placed here automatically. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:16, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Nativitism. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:23 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#Redundo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:50, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*'Numb lists'? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141118014318}}
  +
*:Numb, without feeling, without a sense of what anything is doing there. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:53 18-Nov-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Write a HowTo that will get featured}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Vietnamese}} ==
   
{{VFDg|time=19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=17:42, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
|delnumber=6
+
|delnumber=3
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Rather old and has not been improved on since several months ago. There is some concept but this is probably the same one as of [[HowTo:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia]] and maybe [[HowTo:Write an average Uncyclopedia article]], but with the worse prose, less worked out structure and a title that is not justified (the author does not even talk about writing HowTos, he comes back to it but is still always off-topic). For those who may say that it still has some humour, I provided the above two links: these two articles serve for the same purpose but are funnier. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:24, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The author is the nominator. The article is a cheap imitation. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:54 31-Oct-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Mimo&amp;maxus/sig8}} 12:08, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Author request. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Ditto. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:51, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Sorry but [[HowTo talk:Write a HowTo that will get featured|this]] says all. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
*ScottPat reviewed it a while ago and I apologize to him for making his efforts pointless, but the author himself did not take these comments into account. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
* I don't think this is a deleteable article based upon merit, but I support the author's right to request deletion. I'd recommend that it be added to QVFD rather than putting it to the vote, if that's what the author wants. If it were mine, and I didn't feel it had enough merit to survive, I'd be inclined to move it to my user space though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:21 01 Nov 2013}}
 
**I did not think I could QVFD it, especially because of Scott's review. And what I move to my user space, is something I would like to keep. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
***I think it's worth keeping. Far better than [[Worst 100 Ways To Be Castrated]] or [[Carebear]], which are two of my earliest attempts. But in respect of your right to delete your own work - and only because of that - I will vote to delete. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:37 01 Nov 2013}}
 
****Thanks. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:13, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Cat Nation}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=22:12, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Make it go where Kittenolivia went, and for the same reason. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:12 1-Nov-13</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Catspace}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=22:16, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Another fictional-country (this time, universe) article formerly found on [[:Template:Latin America]]; a merger of Randumbo, cuteness, and memes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:16 1-Nov-13</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
* For those interested in the history of this, it was previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive179|voted kept 5-3]] in March 2009. No real rationale except "there is a lot worse" {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:45 01 Nov 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
== {{VFDn|Invisia}} ==
 
 
{{VFDt|time=23:35, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It's not about anything and no one is ever going to look it up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:35 1-Nov-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --[[User:Precious Star|Precious Star]] ([[User talk:Precious Star|talk]]) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:05 20-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=

Latest revision as of 19:39, November 20, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Llwy-ar-lawr • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Anarcho-fascism H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 166 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. It has it all: A tedious read without photos, hard to tell whether author is an ideologue or is ridiculing ideologues, had links to Facebook and YouTube apparently to hump an internet meme (until I deleted them), and is full of encyclopedia cliches. (Check out Section 2: "Other critics may have alleged....Many believe....It has been suggested....But clearly it is very likely possible...Legend has it..." Utterly not worth streamlining. Spıke ¬ 21:20 13-Nov-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro is supposed to lure the reader in to the rest of the article. Here, the intro is literally factual, and the rest of it I can't tell if it's trying to be funny or just as factual. ConCass2 (talk) 09:25, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Incoherent. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 08:06, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Whatever. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:14 17 Nov 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Despite my warning, Llwy-ar-lawr has been trying to streamline this. But what you wind up with is an "ism" whose only humor is its impossibility — that is, the fact that it is a page no one will look up — unless you came here from Facebook etc. to see if there is an article on this offsite meme. Spıke ¬ 17:35 14-Nov-14

edit 🔒 Crimethink H T D Oldvfd Archive

Score: 1 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 115 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Foreign-language humor. This article is a study in writing a page in the style of the novel 1984 — but not in writing any original comedy. Intro also instructs other Uncyclopedians in the supposed proper use of the templates author created (and Anton199 has revised). Spıke ¬ 00:06 16-Nov-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Send it to Room 101. ConCass2 (talk) 09:22, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  3. What's this, an attempt at summarising 1984 in Newspeak? I'm not seeing the humour. The only funny thing on this page, IMHO, is File:Unbook.jpg. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:28 17 Nov 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. On second thought, it isn't that bad. You just have to get into it, and Anton is right. The better stuff comes later. Perhaps, it could use a thorough editing and some rewriting but not deletion. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:54, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    The article is unreadable. It's the same as the Pig Latin article that was on VFD just a while back - the humour is just the fact that it's unreadable. ConCass2 (talk) 10:24, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh? I can read it. If the problem is that you can't read it, I could provide a translated version as I did before. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 14:46 18 Nov 2014
    The problem is not that the obstacle is insurmountable. The problem is that the article is all about its own obstacle. Spıke ¬ 15:29 18-Nov-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Political/social parody/satire is also funny. I think whomever wrote it did a very good job. It's along the lines of the Captain's Log article which is clearly derived and emulating a specific source but does definitely appeal to those who enjoy that source. Begege (talk) 04:37, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • It's pretty funny at some points. Just read it for long enough. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:48, November 16, 2014 (UTC)

edit About H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 71 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seriously? Spouting random gibberish isn't humour. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 20:26, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of word-association, sometimes descending into numb lists, with no theme holding it together. Spıke ¬ 20:30 17-Nov-14
  3. Was there a point here? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:43 18 Nov 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty stupid. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 04:59, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • 'Numb lists'? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:43 18 Nov 2014
    Numb, without feeling, without a sense of what anything is doing there. Spıke ¬ 01:53 18-Nov-14

edit Vietnamese H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --Precious Star (talk) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. Spıke ¬ 18:05 20-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. ConCass2 (talk) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects