Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Revert ScottPat--Will explain on your talk page)
({{VFDn|Niggle}}: Archive)
 
(5,730 intermediate revisions by 96 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get Expelled from School}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=12:50, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|A load of poopy.}} Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:50 11-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete|Delete.}} Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pupil misbehavior ''can'' be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at [[Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]]. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. [[User:Simsilikesims|Simsilikesims]] ([[User talk:Simsilikesims|talk]]) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Redirect}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
== [[Hampster]] ==
+
|delnumber=1
{{Votervfd|time=13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
|keepnumber=0
+
#{{Delete}} The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
#{{Keep}} The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
|delete=
+
#{{Keep}} I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Not funny and very un-encyclopedic. No images just random rant. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Created in 2005. In 2009, editor {{U|TPCBD}} arrived, so if you are wondering about the acronym in the second paragraph and at the start of '''Military Ranking''', it is a specific Uncyclopedian quoting himself. This fanboy cheerleading has no purpose except to guide readers to the external website given at the end. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:10,13:12 22-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} No redeeming features and an annoying p in the title. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 13:11, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit ''à la'' "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
  +
*Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  +
*EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::Okay, great! I'll just finish my [[Sex change]] and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
:::Thanks a lot! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Heinrich himmler is GAY]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
|delnumber=4
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Another in-joke that ought be in someone's userspace. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} A stub with a surprisingly long history. Melds the Nazi meme with the GAY meme. Worthless. No comedy payback for the choice to write in the first person. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:37 22-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A nice idea, but unfinished. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Atrocious. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:41, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Although the picture is quite fetching. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 12:52, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:It is widely used and will not be a casualty if you vote to delete the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:07 22-Sep-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[19 Kids and Counting]] (redirect at [[The Duggar Family]]) ==
 
{{Votervfd|time22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Keepable now. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:29 14-Jul-15</small>
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Poor article from 2008 that has been bad and offending since then. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've renamed this article to align with the actual name of the TV show and its Wikipedia article, and will edit it to make clear that the Duggars are not specific, non-celebrity individuals being cyberbullied (for which I briefly banned Anon). It is a cruft magnet, as the TV show is about a Christian family with a disdain for birth control. Anyone with a beef about breeders, Christians, and toothless hillbillies, will pile on. At the moment, the article has no comedy strategy except ridiculing the Duggar Family, and by extension any family that shares their values, and calling them sluts. This could be remedied. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 16-Sep-13</small>
 
*I rewrote the "Before kids" section so that it aligns more closely with the Wikipedia article, and I think it works better. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:37, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Yikes! hope that isn't autobiographical! Also, the table of the 19 kids is serving the exact function that listcruft usually does: As an Anon magnet to tell the same joke again. Is there a better approach here? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
 
*::No, I never married or had kids, and my conversion experience was much earlier in life (and not at a service), so it's not autobiographical. As to the table, a better approach would be to have a section about each one of the kids, with a corresponding paragraph (similar to the one I deleted about the oldest because it failed hard), but I am not familiar enough with the show or the kids to do so myself. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 15:56, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Me neither, having temporarily concluded (see above) that this was Anon thinking his neighbors the Duggars needed ridiculing on Uncyclopedia. Your suggestion would solve the table's problem, if anyone out there can undertake it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:14 21-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[ChavScum]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|SGML}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:49, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This page has been on the site since 2006. It is the essence of chav-cruft and used to contain a section inviting future editors to document individual chavs. Editorializing in the page title and the title's unusual spelling (which no random reader is ever going to type) is because its sole purpose has always been to document, and to guide Uncyclopedia readers to, a specific blog in the <code>.uk</code> domain (references now removed). It is not original comedy writing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:49 16-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Bang and the article is gone! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:31, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absolute wank. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 10:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't think this article is funny. Voted. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 02:13, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Fuck Me]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#Keep. I just voted to save this good article deja vu style. Will take out the one quote too many. [[user:Aleister|ALeIsTeR]] 15-9-'13
 
#:You didn't. I just have (removed Wilde #2 and "Some redneck guy"). It doesn't change a thing. Deleting Section 4 (the listcruft) wouldn't help either. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:59 15-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=5
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Awful. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} The point of this page is the glee of swearing to strangers. When it documents the many uses of the word "fuck," it's informative and not funny. When it dabbles in history, it's babbling and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 15-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Exterminate}} Awful. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 23:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Insert gratuitous link to Tvtropes article on Screw Yourself. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig3}} 17:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)(Curse you abusefilter17 D:)
 
#{{Delete}} The article is funny from time to time. But you can see how the author struggles with himself in order to write comedy and not a pornographic novel. At some moments, you can actually see a border between the two. P.S. I did not understand why the "the whore I am" picture violated Wikia terms of use. But, anyway, we won't need this image anymore, of the article gets deleted. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 07:38, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Rucka Rucka Ali]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} A real article, about [[WP:Rucka Rucka Ali|a real "comedian"]], with a real comedy strategy: Misstate the source material. Ali does not seem like a good comedian, mostly specializing in racial stereotypes; and this article isn't the best ever, mostly replacing the truth about Ali with the exact opposite without using the change to make a clever point, but it is trying to do what we try to do. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:18 15-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} [[WP:SuicideGirls|SuicideGirls]] seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
#Per Spike. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 15-9
+
#{{Keep}} Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Bad article, and I don't see any thing that funny in this article. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*'''Renamed.''' Used to be [[Suicide Girl Markup Language]], but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Pantera]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=02:48, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gamer provides his view of the band. To-wit: "a merry group of fags, who one day decided to record the sound of there own love making." If you jump in despite that Intro, the first section tells a joke with excessive recursion. It is nothing but toilet humor thereafter, and that's after I deleted a listing of band members and the usual Discography. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:48 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:25, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Terrible article first made in 2005, during the very early days of Uncyclopedia. It had improved some more, then someone added pictures and more other stuff. Then, someone decided to blank part of it, and it still remained a very poor and unfunny article for years. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 13:13, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:If you have found a version in the page history that you think is better, you are welcome to substitute it (and reattach {{Tl|VFD}}) and we'll vote on that. In fact, the nominator is supposed to do that. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:18 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:16, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=17:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:30 28-Jul-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:00 in these parts
+
#{{Keep}} With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} God, this is awful. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 18:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The quotes are bad and once they are removed it leaves nothing. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:46, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} It is very old and I don't think the author will ever want to come back. But we can still notify him. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Not funny. It is somewhat possible that someone can salvage this. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
== [[Hot dog]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*{{Comment}} I am planning to make an improvement to this article in my userspace and removing the lower organ jokes and other stupid stuff. And this would probably be the case. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:55, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Your "plan" seems to have halted voting on this page. Please take a copy of it now (or ask me for a copy after it gets deleted). Deletion will not bar you or anyone from writing a replacement page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:15 14-Sep-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 07:16, July 31, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit HowTo:Get Expelled from School H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 492 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote A load of poopy. Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:50 11-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--EStop (talk) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pupil misbehavior can be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. Simsilikesims (talk) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

edit Redirect H T D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 414 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit à la "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  • Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  • EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, great! I'll just finish my Sex change and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--EStop (talk) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

edit The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 414 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A nice idea, but unfinished. --EStop (talk) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:29 14-Jul-15
Comments

edit SGML H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 278 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. SuicideGirls seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--EStop (talk) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Renamed. Used to be Suicide Girl Markup Language, but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 148 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15

edit Exploding Testicles H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 80 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:30 28-Jul-15
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects