Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Revert ScottPat--Will explain on your talk page)
m ({{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}})
 
(5,584 intermediate revisions by 95 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=#Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pointless. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:04 6-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
== [[Hampster]] ==
+
|delnumber=4
{{Votervfd|time=13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
  +
#Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Not funny and very un-encyclopedic. No images just random rant. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Created in 2005. In 2009, editor {{U|TPCBD}} arrived, so if you are wondering about the acronym in the second paragraph and at the start of '''Military Ranking''', it is a specific Uncyclopedian quoting himself. This fanboy cheerleading has no purpose except to guide readers to the external website given at the end. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:10,13:12 22-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} No redeeming features and an annoying p in the title. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 13:11, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
  +
::You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like [[Rembrandt]] or [[Glory hole]]), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Heinrich himmler is GAY]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Never-Ending Story}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=08:19, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Image-free randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never compose while on drugs. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:42 10-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Felt like it would never end. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Another in-joke that ought be in someone's userspace. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} A stub with a surprisingly long history. Melds the Nazi meme with the GAY meme. Worthless. No comedy payback for the choice to write in the first person. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:37 22-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Atrocious. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:41, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Although the picture is quite fetching. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 12:52, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:It is widely used and will not be a casualty if you vote to delete the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:07 22-Sep-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[19 Kids and Counting]] (redirect at [[The Duggar Family]]) ==
+
== {{VFDn|Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch}} ==
{{Votervfd|time22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=20:55, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>20:55 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Keepable now. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Poor article from 2008 that has been bad and offending since then. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've renamed this article to align with the actual name of the TV show and its Wikipedia article, and will edit it to make clear that the Duggars are not specific, non-celebrity individuals being cyberbullied (for which I briefly banned Anon). It is a cruft magnet, as the TV show is about a Christian family with a disdain for birth control. Anyone with a beef about breeders, Christians, and toothless hillbillies, will pile on. At the moment, the article has no comedy strategy except ridiculing the Duggar Family, and by extension any family that shares their values, and calling them sluts. This could be remedied. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 16-Sep-13</small>
 
*I rewrote the "Before kids" section so that it aligns more closely with the Wikipedia article, and I think it works better. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:37, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Yikes! hope that isn't autobiographical! Also, the table of the 19 kids is serving the exact function that listcruft usually does: As an Anon magnet to tell the same joke again. Is there a better approach here? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
 
*::No, I never married or had kids, and my conversion experience was much earlier in life (and not at a service), so it's not autobiographical. As to the table, a better approach would be to have a section about each one of the kids, with a corresponding paragraph (similar to the one I deleted about the oldest because it failed hard), but I am not familiar enough with the show or the kids to do so myself. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 15:56, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Me neither, having temporarily concluded (see above) that this was Anon thinking his neighbors the Duggars needed ridiculing on Uncyclopedia. Your suggestion would solve the table's problem, if anyone out there can undertake it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:14 21-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[ChavScum]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:49, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=22:08, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} 2010 author {{U|Weri long wang}} writes the opposite of the plot of ''Atlas Shrugged,'' then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:08 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This page has been on the site since 2006. It is the essence of chav-cruft and used to contain a section inviting future editors to document individual chavs. Editorializing in the page title and the title's unusual spelling (which no random reader is ever going to type) is because its sole purpose has always been to document, and to guide Uncyclopedia readers to, a specific blog in the <code>.uk</code> domain (references now removed). It is not original comedy writing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:49 16-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Bang and the article is gone! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:31, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absolute wank. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 10:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't think this article is funny. Voted. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 02:13, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Fuck Me]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Latte}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=18:03, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>18:03 26-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Should have called it Frappe. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
|keep=
+
|keep=#It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
#Keep. I just voted to save this good article deja vu style. Will take out the one quote too many. [[user:Aleister|ALeIsTeR]] 15-9-'13
 
#:You didn't. I just have (removed Wilde #2 and "Some redneck guy"). It doesn't change a thing. Deleting Section 4 (the listcruft) wouldn't help either. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:59 15-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The point of this page is the glee of swearing to strangers. When it documents the many uses of the word "fuck," it's informative and not funny. When it dabbles in history, it's babbling and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 15-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Exterminate}} Awful. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 23:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Insert gratuitous link to Tvtropes article on Screw Yourself. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig3}} 17:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)(Curse you abusefilter17 D:)
 
#{{Delete}} The article is funny from time to time. But you can see how the author struggles with himself in order to write comedy and not a pornographic novel. At some moments, you can actually see a border between the two. P.S. I did not understand why the "the whore I am" picture violated Wikia terms of use. But, anyway, we won't need this image anymore, of the article gets deleted. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 07:38, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Rucka Rucka Ali]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Who Do You Think}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=3
#{{Keep}} A real article, about [[WP:Rucka Rucka Ali|a real "comedian"]], with a real comedy strategy: Misstate the source material. Ali does not seem like a good comedian, mostly specializing in racial stereotypes; and this article isn't the best ever, mostly replacing the truth about Ali with the exact opposite without using the change to make a clever point, but it is trying to do what we try to do. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:18 15-Sep-13</small>
 
#Per Spike. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 15-9
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Bad article, and I don't see any thing that funny in this article. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
#No redeeming value as far as I can tell {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:20 28-Jun-15</small>
}}
+
#{{Delete}} Baffling gibberish. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
== [[Pantera]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=02:48, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gamer provides his view of the band. To-wit: "a merry group of fags, who one day decided to record the sound of there own love making." If you jump in despite that Intro, the first section tells a joke with excessive recursion. It is nothing but toilet humor thereafter, and that's after I deleted a listing of band members and the usual Discography. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:48 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:25, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Terrible article first made in 2005, during the very early days of Uncyclopedia. It had improved some more, then someone added pictures and more other stuff. Then, someone decided to blank part of it, and it still remained a very poor and unfunny article for years. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 13:13, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:If you have found a version in the page history that you think is better, you are welcome to substitute it (and reattach {{Tl|VFD}}) and we'll vote on that. In fact, the nominator is supposed to do that. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:18 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:16, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=03:35, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=1
#Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:00 in these parts
 
|delnumber=5
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>03:35 30-Jun-15</small>
#{{Delete}} God, this is awful. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 18:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The quotes are bad and once they are removed it leaves nothing. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:46, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} It is very old and I don't think the author will ever want to come back. But we can still notify him. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Not funny. It is somewhat possible that someone can salvage this. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Hot dog]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment}} I am planning to make an improvement to this article in my userspace and removing the lower organ jokes and other stupid stuff. And this would probably be the case. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:55, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Your "plan" seems to have halted voting on this page. Please take a copy of it now (or ask me for a copy after it gets deleted). Deletion will not bar you or anyone from writing a replacement page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:15 14-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:21, June 30, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 674 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pointless. Spıke Ѧ 17:04 6-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 576 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like Rembrandt or Glory hole), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)

edit Never-Ending Story H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 514 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Image-free randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never compose while on drugs. Spıke Ѧ 11:42 10-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Felt like it would never end. --EStop (talk) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 237 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 236 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Latte H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 120 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. Spıke Radiomicrophone18:03 26-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Should have called it Frappe. --EStop (talk) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit Who Do You Think H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 76 hours
Delete (3)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 38 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects