Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Revert ScottPat--Will explain on your talk page)
({{VFDn|Dog}})
 
(7,065 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
<!-- Why is the end stuff at the beginning? Because {VFDr} contains a form to nominate a new page that adds a section at the end. -->
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia voting pages]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Anarchy}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=02:53, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Has been under {{Tl|Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:53 14-Mar-16</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested. {{User:EStop/signature}} 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Lists. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:35, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
== [[Hampster]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not funny and very un-encyclopedic. No images just random rant. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:35 5-Apr-16</small>
#{{Delete}} Created in 2005. In 2009, editor {{U|TPCBD}} arrived, so if you are wondering about the acronym in the second paragraph and at the start of '''Military Ranking''', it is a specific Uncyclopedian quoting himself. This fanboy cheerleading has no purpose except to guide readers to the external website given at the end. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:10,13:12 22-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} No redeeming features and an annoying p in the title. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 13:11, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'. {{User:EStop/signature}} 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Heinrich himmler is GAY]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Another in-joke that ought be in someone's userspace. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} A stub with a surprisingly long history. Melds the Nazi meme with the GAY meme. Worthless. No comedy payback for the choice to write in the first person. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:37 22-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Atrocious. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:41, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Although the picture is quite fetching. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 12:52, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:It is widely used and will not be a casualty if you vote to delete the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:07 22-Sep-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[19 Kids and Counting]] (redirect at [[The Duggar Family]]) ==
+
== {{VFDn|Colony of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=15:11, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>15:11 26-Apr-16</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Keepable now. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Poor article from 2008 that has been bad and offending since then. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've renamed this article to align with the actual name of the TV show and its Wikipedia article, and will edit it to make clear that the Duggars are not specific, non-celebrity individuals being cyberbullied (for which I briefly banned Anon). It is a cruft magnet, as the TV show is about a Christian family with a disdain for birth control. Anyone with a beef about breeders, Christians, and toothless hillbillies, will pile on. At the moment, the article has no comedy strategy except ridiculing the Duggar Family, and by extension any family that shares their values, and calling them sluts. This could be remedied. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 16-Sep-13</small>
 
*I rewrote the "Before kids" section so that it aligns more closely with the Wikipedia article, and I think it works better. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:37, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Yikes! hope that isn't autobiographical! Also, the table of the 19 kids is serving the exact function that listcruft usually does: As an Anon magnet to tell the same joke again. Is there a better approach here? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
 
*::No, I never married or had kids, and my conversion experience was much earlier in life (and not at a service), so it's not autobiographical. As to the table, a better approach would be to have a section about each one of the kids, with a corresponding paragraph (similar to the one I deleted about the oldest because it failed hard), but I am not familiar enough with the show or the kids to do so myself. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 15:56, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Me neither, having temporarily concluded (see above) that this was Anon thinking his neighbors the Duggars needed ridiculing on Uncyclopedia. Your suggestion would solve the table's problem, if anyone out there can undertake it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:14 21-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[ChavScum]] ==
+
== {{VFDc|Dr. Chen Chinese medicine for breathe delight}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:49, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This page has been on the site since 2006. It is the essence of chav-cruft and used to contain a section inviting future editors to document individual chavs. Editorializing in the page title and the title's unusual spelling (which no random reader is ever going to type) is because its sole purpose has always been to document, and to guide Uncyclopedia readers to, a specific blog in the <code>.uk</code> domain (references now removed). It is not original comedy writing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:49 16-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Bang and the article is gone! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:31, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absolute wank. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 10:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't think this article is funny. Voted. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 02:13, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Fuck Me]] ==
+
{{VFDg|time=17:54, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#Keep. I just voted to save this good article deja vu style. Will take out the one quote too many. [[user:Aleister|ALeIsTeR]] 15-9-'13
 
#:You didn't. I just have (removed Wilde #2 and "Some redneck guy"). It doesn't change a thing. Deleting Section 4 (the listcruft) wouldn't help either. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:59 15-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=5
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Awful. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Pidgin English is endearing, but this article has nothing else. All I can figure is that author {{U|One-eyed Jack}} in 2008 saw a sales pitch, poorly translated, and transcribed it here without much enhancement. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:54 27-Apr-16</small>
#{{Delete}} The point of this page is the glee of swearing to strangers. When it documents the many uses of the word "fuck," it's informative and not funny. When it dabbles in history, it's babbling and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 15-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} An article about nothing under a title no-one will look up. The only comedy concept is a Chinese man speaking broken English, but it doesn't work when the article is about nothing. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 18:58, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Exterminate}} Awful. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 23:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Insert gratuitous link to Tvtropes article on Screw Yourself. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig3}} 17:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)(Curse you abusefilter17 D:)
 
#{{Delete}} The article is funny from time to time. But you can see how the author struggles with himself in order to write comedy and not a pornographic novel. At some moments, you can actually see a border between the two. P.S. I did not understand why the "the whore I am" picture violated Wikia terms of use. But, anyway, we won't need this image anymore, of the article gets deleted. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 07:38, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Rucka Rucka Ali]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} A real article, about [[WP:Rucka Rucka Ali|a real "comedian"]], with a real comedy strategy: Misstate the source material. Ali does not seem like a good comedian, mostly specializing in racial stereotypes; and this article isn't the best ever, mostly replacing the truth about Ali with the exact opposite without using the change to make a clever point, but it is trying to do what we try to do. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:18 15-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} I actually found this a very fun read, as the carefully-constructed Engrish is spot-on and very reminiscent of the poorly-translated product slogans one might find funny pictures of online. The Chinese text is a nice touch as well. Maybe the topic is not one people will search for, but this was very well-written and it would be unfortunate to see it deleted. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 16:40, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
#Per Spike. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 15-9
+
#{{Keep}} The "testimonials" at the end are hilarious, and the descriptions of completely vile remedies in Engrish made me smile. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 16:52, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Bad article, and I don't see any thing that funny in this article. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Pantera]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=02:48, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gamer provides his view of the band. To-wit: "a merry group of fags, who one day decided to record the sound of there own love making." If you jump in despite that Intro, the first section tells a joke with excessive recursion. It is nothing but toilet humor thereafter, and that's after I deleted a listing of band members and the usual Discography. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:48 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:25, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Terrible article first made in 2005, during the very early days of Uncyclopedia. It had improved some more, then someone added pictures and more other stuff. Then, someone decided to blank part of it, and it still remained a very poor and unfunny article for years. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 13:13, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:If you have found a version in the page history that you think is better, you are welcome to substitute it (and reattach {{Tl|VFD}}) and we'll vote on that. In fact, the nominator is supposed to do that. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:18 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:16, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=04:45, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:00 in these parts
 
|delnumber=5
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive-2015-10#Dog|Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15]] as it just took Featured Article [[Dogs]] and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and {{U|EStop}} voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at [[User:EStop/Dogs]]. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:50 3-May-16</small>
#{{Delete}} God, this is awful. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 18:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} The quotes are bad and once they are removed it leaves nothing. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:46, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The new version is ready for the mainspace, once this is gone. {{User:EStop/signature}} 06:06, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} It is very old and I don't think the author will ever want to come back. But we can still notify him. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Not funny. It is somewhat possible that someone can salvage this. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Hot dog]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment}} I am planning to make an improvement to this article in my userspace and removing the lower organ jokes and other stupid stuff. And this would probably be the case. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:55, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Timer reset due to no VFD tag on article. There is now a VFD tag, 5 hours later. Also, this article is not just a rant - it tells a story of a jealous lover who went too far and killed his lover because he thought the dog was another lover. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 04:46, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
*:Your "plan" seems to have halted voting on this page. Please take a copy of it now (or ask me for a copy after it gets deleted). Deletion will not bar you or anyone from writing a replacement page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:15 14-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 06:06, May 4, 2016

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Expert3222 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Anarchy H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1227 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Has been under {{Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). Spıke Radiomicrophone02:53 14-Mar-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested.  EStop Easy button 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lists. ConCass2 (talk) 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 701 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:35 5-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". ConCass2 (talk) 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'.  EStop Easy button 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Colony of America H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 182 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. Spıke Radiomicrophone15:11 26-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

edit 🔒 Dr. Chen Chinese medicine for breathe delight H D Oldvfd Archive

Score: 0 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 156 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pidgin English is endearing, but this article has nothing else. All I can figure is that author One-eyed Jack in 2008 saw a sales pitch, poorly translated, and transcribed it here without much enhancement. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:54 27-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. An article about nothing under a title no-one will look up. The only comedy concept is a Chinese man speaking broken English, but it doesn't work when the article is about nothing. ConCass2 (talk) 18:58, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I actually found this a very fun read, as the carefully-constructed Engrish is spot-on and very reminiscent of the poorly-translated product slogans one might find funny pictures of online. The Chinese text is a nice touch as well. Maybe the topic is not one people will search for, but this was very well-written and it would be unfortunate to see it deleted. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 16:40, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The "testimonials" at the end are hilarious, and the descriptions of completely vile remedies in Engrish made me smile. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:52, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

edit Dog H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 25 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15 as it just took Featured Article Dogs and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and EStop voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at User:EStop/Dogs. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:50 3-May-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. ConCass2 (talk) 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The new version is ready for the mainspace, once this is gone.  EStop Easy button 06:06, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  1. Timer reset due to no VFD tag on article. There is now a VFD tag, 5 hours later. Also, this article is not just a rant - it tells a story of a jealous lover who went too far and killed his lover because he thought the dog was another lover. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:46, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects