Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Revert ScottPat--Will explain on your talk page)
({{VFDn|Hemorrhoid}}: Correction)
 
(5,457 intermediate revisions by 92 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Chyna}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=23:18, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=5
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:18 7-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} I gave up after the first sentence. [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] ([[User talk:BrokenKnives|talk]]) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I'm with [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] on this one. I maybe got a ''little'' further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{For}} A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#:Why? Is the article internet famous? {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|A Day at the Barn with Hitler}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=01:55, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
== [[Hampster]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not funny and very un-encyclopedic. No images just random rant. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by {{U|Thetoastman}} in 2006. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:55 10-May-15</small>
#{{Delete}} Created in 2005. In 2009, editor {{U|TPCBD}} arrived, so if you are wondering about the acronym in the second paragraph and at the start of '''Military Ranking''', it is a specific Uncyclopedian quoting himself. This fanboy cheerleading has no purpose except to guide readers to the external website given at the end. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:10,13:12 22-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} If it is not original work, it should go.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} No redeeming features and an annoying p in the title. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 13:11, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Heinrich himmler is GAY]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Another in-joke that ought be in someone's userspace. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} A stub with a surprisingly long history. Melds the Nazi meme with the GAY meme. Worthless. No comedy payback for the choice to write in the first person. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:37 22-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Atrocious. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:41, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Although the picture is quite fetching. --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 12:52, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:It is widely used and will not be a casualty if you vote to delete the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:07 22-Sep-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:40 10-May-15</small>
  +
*::Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:31 25-May-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[19 Kids and Counting]] (redirect at [[The Duggar Family]]) ==
+
== {{VFDn|Labor Party}} ==
{{Votervfd|time22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Keepable now. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin {{U|Mnbvcxz}} (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:58 11-May-15</small>
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Poor article from 2008 that has been bad and offending since then. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've renamed this article to align with the actual name of the TV show and its Wikipedia article, and will edit it to make clear that the Duggars are not specific, non-celebrity individuals being cyberbullied (for which I briefly banned Anon). It is a cruft magnet, as the TV show is about a Christian family with a disdain for birth control. Anyone with a beef about breeders, Christians, and toothless hillbillies, will pile on. At the moment, the article has no comedy strategy except ridiculing the Duggar Family, and by extension any family that shares their values, and calling them sluts. This could be remedied. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 16-Sep-13</small>
+
*Not to be confused with [[Labour Party (UK)]]. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
*I rewrote the "Before kids" section so that it aligns more closely with the Wikipedia article, and I think it works better. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:37, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
*Not to be confused with the Labor Party in Australia either. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:30, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
*:Yikes! hope that isn't autobiographical! Also, the table of the 19 kids is serving the exact function that listcruft usually does: As an Anon magnet to tell the same joke again. Is there a better approach here? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:58 21-Sep-13</small>
 
*::No, I never married or had kids, and my conversion experience was much earlier in life (and not at a service), so it's not autobiographical. As to the table, a better approach would be to have a section about each one of the kids, with a corresponding paragraph (similar to the one I deleted about the oldest because it failed hard), but I am not familiar enough with the show or the kids to do so myself. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 15:56, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Me neither, having temporarily concluded (see above) that this was Anon thinking his neighbors the Duggars needed ridiculing on Uncyclopedia. Your suggestion would solve the table's problem, if anyone out there can undertake it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:14 21-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[ChavScum]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Al Qaeda Chicken}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:49, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=13:37, May 24, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 24-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This page has been on the site since 2006. It is the essence of chav-cruft and used to contain a section inviting future editors to document individual chavs. Editorializing in the page title and the title's unusual spelling (which no random reader is ever going to type) is because its sole purpose has always been to document, and to guide Uncyclopedia readers to, a specific blog in the <code>.uk</code> domain (references now removed). It is not original comedy writing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:49 16-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Bang and the article is gone! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:31, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Absolute wank. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 10:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I don't think this article is funny. Voted. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 02:13, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
* On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual [[KFC]] article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Fuck Me]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#Keep. I just voted to save this good article deja vu style. Will take out the one quote too many. [[user:Aleister|ALeIsTeR]] 15-9-'13
 
#:You didn't. I just have (removed Wilde #2 and "Some redneck guy"). It doesn't change a thing. Deleting Section 4 (the listcruft) wouldn't help either. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:59 15-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The point of this page is the glee of swearing to strangers. When it documents the many uses of the word "fuck," it's informative and not funny. When it dabbles in history, it's babbling and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 15-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Exterminate}} Awful. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 23:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Insert gratuitous link to Tvtropes article on Screw Yourself. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig3}} 17:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)(Curse you abusefilter17 D:)
 
#{{Delete}} The article is funny from time to time. But you can see how the author struggles with himself in order to write comedy and not a pornographic novel. At some moments, you can actually see a border between the two. P.S. I did not understand why the "the whore I am" picture violated Wikia terms of use. But, anyway, we won't need this image anymore, of the article gets deleted. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 07:38, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Rucka Rucka Ali]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=13:41, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} A real article, about [[WP:Rucka Rucka Ali|a real "comedian"]], with a real comedy strategy: Misstate the source material. Ali does not seem like a good comedian, mostly specializing in racial stereotypes; and this article isn't the best ever, mostly replacing the truth about Ali with the exact opposite without using the change to make a clever point, but it is trying to do what we try to do. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:18 15-Sep-13</small>
 
#Per Spike. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 15-9
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Bad article, and I don't see any thing that funny in this article. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} A chatty article about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:41 25-May-15</small>
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
}}
 
 
== [[Pantera]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=02:48, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A gamer provides his view of the band. To-wit: "a merry group of fags, who one day decided to record the sound of there own love making." If you jump in despite that Intro, the first section tells a joke with excessive recursion. It is nothing but toilet humor thereafter, and that's after I deleted a listing of band members and the usual Discography. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:48 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:25, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Terrible article first made in 2005, during the very early days of Uncyclopedia. It had improved some more, then someone added pictures and more other stuff. Then, someone decided to blank part of it, and it still remained a very poor and unfunny article for years. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 13:13, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:If you have found a version in the page history that you think is better, you are welcome to substitute it (and reattach {{Tl|VFD}}) and we'll vote on that. In fact, the nominator is supposed to do that. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:18 14-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:16, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Hemorrhoid}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
#Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:00 in these parts
 
|delnumber=5
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} God, this is awful. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 18:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Admin {{U|Zim ulator}} swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 25-May-15</small>
#{{Delete}} The quotes are bad and once they are removed it leaves nothing. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:46, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:Sorry, I guess the final word does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 25-May-15</small>
#{{Delete}} It is very old and I don't think the author will ever want to come back. But we can still notify him. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Easy Button}} Not funny. It is somewhat possible that someone can salvage this. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Hot dog]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment}} I am planning to make an improvement to this article in my userspace and removing the lower organ jokes and other stupid stuff. And this would probably be the case. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 20:55, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Your "plan" seems to have halted voting on this page. Please take a copy of it now (or ask me for a copy after it gets deleted). Deletion will not bar you or anyone from writing a replacement page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:15 14-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 23:10, May 25, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Chyna H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 431 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). Spıke Ѧ 23:18 7-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I gave up after the first sentence. BrokenKnives (talk) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm with BrokenKnives on this one. I maybe got a little further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol for vote For. A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
    Why? Is the article internet famous? SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit A Day at the Barn with Hitler H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 381 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by Thetoastman in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:55 10-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it is not original work, it should go.--EStop (talk) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
    To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 10-May-15
    Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --EStop (talk) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
    If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 18:31 25-May-15

edit Labor Party H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 369 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin Mnbvcxz (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 11-May-15
Comments

edit Al Qaeda Chicken H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 33 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. Spıke Ѧ 13:37 24-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual KFC article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

edit What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 9 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A chatty article about nothing. Spıke Ѧ 13:41 25-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hemorrhoid H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 0 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Admin Zim ulator swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. Spıke Ѧ 23:04 25-May-15
    Sorry, I guess the final word does. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 25-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects