Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Vocaloid)
({{VFDn|Dog}}: VFD)
 
(7,268 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
<!-- Why is the end stuff at the beginning? Because {VFDr} contains a form to nominate a new page that adds a section at the end. -->
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia voting pages]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Anarchy}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=02:53, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Has been under {{Tl|Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:53 14-Mar-16</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested. {{User:EStop/signature}} 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Lists. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:35, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
== [[Vocaloid]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:35 5-Apr-16</small>
|keepnumber=1
+
#{{Delete}} I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'. {{User:EStop/signature}} 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:05 a very good year
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete}} Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. [[User:Chaoarren|Chaoarren]] ([[User talk:Chaoarren|talk]]) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Boombot}} This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! {{User:Newman66/sig}} 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
#Thïs entry is not recording my "Keep" vote. Please look in the edit" and you will see it there. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:10 also a very good year
 
#:It now is. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:36, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDc|N.W.A.}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Colony of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=15:11, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
#{{Keep}} I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 7-Sep-13</small>
 
#:Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:: It is File:Nwa4px.gif. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:::Now restored, but only used once in the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#<s>{{Delete|Article with attitude}} It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)</s>
+
#{{Delete}} Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>15:11 26-Apr-16</small>
#:Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=
 
*'''Vote closed'''--nomination withdrawn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
|keep=Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister in Chains|Aleister in Chains]] 19:00 in these parts
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Worst 100 Porn Stars of All Time]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
#{{Keep}} It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Not really worth keeping, is it? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 5-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} NOW! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:26 6-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Exterminate}} I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{Tl|USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:15 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#::You do? And how about [[Minitrue]]? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Hot dog]] ==
+
== {{VFDc|Dr. Chen Chinese medicine for breathe delight}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDg|time=17:54, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Pidgin English is endearing, but this article has nothing else. All I can figure is that author {{U|One-eyed Jack}} in 2008 saw a sales pitch, poorly translated, and transcribed it here without much enhancement. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:54 27-Apr-16</small>
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} An article about nothing under a title no-one will look up. The only comedy concept is a Chinese man speaking broken English, but it doesn't work when the article is about nothing. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 18:58, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Bearded dragon]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} As I voted [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive227#Bearded_dragon|in 2011]]. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (''Pogona barbata'') is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:48 1-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} I actually found this a very fun read, as the carefully-constructed Engrish is spot-on and very reminiscent of the poorly-translated product slogans one might find funny pictures of online. The Chinese text is a nice touch as well. Maybe the topic is not one people will search for, but this was very well-written and it would be unfortunate to see it deleted. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 16:40, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Keep}} But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} The "testimonials" at the end are hilarious, and the descriptions of completely vile remedies in Engrish made me smile. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 16:52, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
#:I gave it a bit more, relating it to [[Samson]] and the [[bearded clam]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:07 2-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[A-rod]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=00:50, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
#{{Keep}} It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on [[Alex Rodriguez]]--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 29-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:37 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual [[UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol]] will tell you what the big deal is.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:46 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive-2015-10#Dog|Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15]] as it just took Featured Article [[Dogs]] and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and {{U|EStop}} voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at [[User:EStop/Dogs]]. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:50 3-May-16</small>
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
}}
+
|keepnumber=0
 
== [[Furcadia]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:48, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} '''I''' took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor [[User:Kotra|kotra]] wasn't the subject of it. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Pacman}} The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What did you find there? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 06:35, May 3, 2016

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Expert3222 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Anarchy H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1203 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Has been under {{Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). Spıke Radiomicrophone02:53 14-Mar-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested.  EStop Easy button 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lists. ConCass2 (talk) 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 678 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:35 5-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". ConCass2 (talk) 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'.  EStop Easy button 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Colony of America H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 159 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. Spıke Radiomicrophone15:11 26-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

edit 🔒 Dr. Chen Chinese medicine for breathe delight H D Oldvfd Archive

Score: 0 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 132 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pidgin English is endearing, but this article has nothing else. All I can figure is that author One-eyed Jack in 2008 saw a sales pitch, poorly translated, and transcribed it here without much enhancement. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:54 27-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. An article about nothing under a title no-one will look up. The only comedy concept is a Chinese man speaking broken English, but it doesn't work when the article is about nothing. ConCass2 (talk) 18:58, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I actually found this a very fun read, as the carefully-constructed Engrish is spot-on and very reminiscent of the poorly-translated product slogans one might find funny pictures of online. The Chinese text is a nice touch as well. Maybe the topic is not one people will search for, but this was very well-written and it would be unfortunate to see it deleted. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 16:40, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The "testimonials" at the end are hilarious, and the descriptions of completely vile remedies in Engrish made me smile. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:52, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

edit Dog H T D Survivor Tag article

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 5 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15 as it just took Featured Article Dogs and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and EStop voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at User:EStop/Dogs. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:50 3-May-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. ConCass2 (talk) 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects