Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Vocaloid)
m ({{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}})
 
(5,790 intermediate revisions by 96 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=#Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pointless. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:04 6-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
== [[Vocaloid]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
|keepnumber=1
+
#{{Delete}} Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:05 a very good year
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete}} Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. [[User:Chaoarren|Chaoarren]] ([[User talk:Chaoarren|talk]]) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Boombot}} This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! {{User:Newman66/sig}} 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
#Thïs entry is not recording my "Keep" vote. Please look in the edit" and you will see it there. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:10 also a very good year
+
*Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
#:It now is. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:36, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
::You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like [[Rembrandt]] or [[Glory hole]]), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDc|N.W.A.}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Never-Ending Story}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=08:19, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Image-free randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never compose while on drugs. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:42 10-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Felt like it would never end. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 7-Sep-13</small>
 
#:Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:: It is File:Nwa4px.gif. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:::Now restored, but only used once in the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
#<s>{{Delete|Article with attitude}} It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
#:Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*'''Vote closed'''--nomination withdrawn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=20:55, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister in Chains|Aleister in Chains]] 19:00 in these parts
+
|delnumber=3
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>20:55 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Worst 100 Porn Stars of All Time]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=22:08, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} 2010 author {{U|Weri long wang}} writes the opposite of the plot of ''Atlas Shrugged,'' then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:08 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Not really worth keeping, is it? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 5-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} NOW! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:26 6-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Exterminate}} I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{Tl|USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:15 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#::You do? And how about [[Minitrue]]? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Hot dog]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Latte}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=18:03, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>18:03 26-Jun-15</small>
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Should have called it Frappe. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=#It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Bearded dragon]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Who Do You Think}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=3
#{{Keep}} As I voted [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive227#Bearded_dragon|in 2011]]. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (''Pogona barbata'') is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:48 1-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I gave it a bit more, relating it to [[Samson]] and the [[bearded clam]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:07 2-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#No redeeming value as far as I can tell {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:20 28-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Baffling gibberish. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[A-rod]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=03:35, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on [[Alex Rodriguez]]--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 29-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:37 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual [[UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol]] will tell you what the big deal is.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:46 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>03:35 30-Jun-15</small>
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=0
}}
 
 
== [[Furcadia]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:48, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} '''I''' took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor [[User:Kotra|kotra]] wasn't the subject of it. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Pacman}} The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What did you find there? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:21, June 30, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 649 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pointless. Spıke Ѧ 17:04 6-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 551 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like Rembrandt or Glory hole), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)

edit Never-Ending Story H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 489 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Image-free randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never compose while on drugs. Spıke Ѧ 11:42 10-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Felt like it would never end. --EStop (talk) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 212 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 211 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Latte H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 95 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. Spıke Radiomicrophone18:03 26-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Should have called it Frappe. --EStop (talk) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit Who Do You Think H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 51 hours
Delete (3)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 13 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects