Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Vocaloid)
({{VFDn|My ingenious plan to attack Obama with non-lethal weapons}}: new section)
 
(4,009 intermediate revisions by 65 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Johnson County, Kansas}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=10:31, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:31 12-Aug-14</small>
}}
+
#{{Delete}} Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
+
#{{Delete}} Small town Kansas Kruft. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
 
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
 
 
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
 
 
== [[Vocaloid]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:05 a very good year
+
#{{Keep}} Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete}} Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. [[User:Chaoarren|Chaoarren]] ([[User talk:Chaoarren|talk]]) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Boombot}} This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! {{User:Newman66/sig}} 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
#Thïs entry is not recording my "Keep" vote. Please look in the edit" and you will see it there. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:10 also a very good year
+
*I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:01 24-Aug-14</small>
#:It now is. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:36, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
*There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004137}}
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDc|N.W.A.}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Office etiquette}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=03:02, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=3
#{{Keep}} I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 7-Sep-13</small>
 
#:Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:: It is File:Nwa4px.gif. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:::Now restored, but only used once in the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#<s>{{Delete|Article with attitude}} It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)</s>
+
#{{Delete}} Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that '''this is a humor wiki'''. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:02 13-Aug-14</small>
#:Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} One liners. Not good.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
*'''Vote closed'''--nomination withdrawn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
|keep=Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister in Chains|Aleister in Chains]] 19:00 in these parts
+
|keep=#I laughed. I don't know why, but I did. Quite a bit, actually. I'm so sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830002847}}
|delnumber=1
+
#:Clarification: I found many of the etiquette tips to be funny, but the intro and some tips seem to be serious. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004237}}
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:58 17-Aug-14</small>
  +
*:I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*{{U|Moonhead42}} is trying to save this. I say on his talk page that it needs more drastic surgery; voters, feel free to kibitz. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:21 30-Aug-14</small>
  +
*:I hate to say it, but I kind of prefer it before his changes. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831024833}}
  +
*::His initial edits were more-of-the-same, but yesterday he seemed to take up my challenge to remedy the overdependence on lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>09:54 31-Aug-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Worst 100 Porn Stars of All Time]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Johnny Gay}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=01:45, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:45 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not very funny and not notable enough. <s>I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1ylkdldauc this YouTube video].</s> {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#::But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:08 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Thanks for the meme-ory. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Blah. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830002915}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
|comments=*The sprites are missing from this article. No idea what's going on. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004707}}
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Lahore}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=11:05, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not really worth keeping, is it? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:38 19-Aug-14</small>
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} NOW! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Short and sucky. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830001738}}
#:Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:26 6-Sep-13</small>
+
|keepnumber=0
#{{Exterminate}} I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keep=
#:I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{Tl|USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:15 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#::You do? And how about [[Minitrue]]? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Hot dog]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dolphin uprising}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see [[Emu War]] and [[Animals with feet war with animals with no feet]]. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of {{U|Sunoco}} is a waste of time, except to key us to [[:Category:Silly wars]], where other VFD fodder may be found. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 25-Aug-14</small>
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Silly wars? We don't need no silly wars. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 03:33, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} I think it's a funny article that goes well with mine. I don't get why you think that "personal story arcs" are so evil, in this case I believe that continuity between some of the articles improves them overall.{{unsigned|SamTheAwesome}}
  +
#:I can't speak for Spike, but I think continuity is ok as long as the articles are high quality. I also think your article is somewhat funny, for whatever it's worth (which probably isn't a whole lot) and better than [[Dolphin uprising]]. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830001341}}
  +
#::''Anything'' is OK as long as an article is of sufficiently high quality. The problem with story arcs is this: Humor is the highest value for an Uncyclopedian considering new edits to an article; and declining to apply an edit because SamTheAwesome wants [[Dolphin uprising]] to make sense when read alongside [[The Great Whale Invasion]] is a gigantic non-issue with which to burden any Uncyclopedian. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:46 30-Aug-14</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*New Uncyclopedian {{U|SamTheAwesome}} has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new [[The Great Whale Invasion]] (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:08 21-Aug-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Bearded dragon]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|United Socialist States of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=22:21, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:21 21-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not horrible but too far from the truth to be funny, IMHO. Just kind of dull, really. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 23:29, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#ConCass2 made it a bit better, but it's still not great. Sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 02:47, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} As I voted [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive227#Bearded_dragon|in 2011]]. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (''Pogona barbata'') is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:48 1-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Keep}} But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:14 25-Aug-14</small>
#:I gave it a bit more, relating it to [[Samson]] and the [[bearded clam]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:07 2-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*{{Comment}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_in_the_USSA], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*::Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:12 22-Aug-14</small>
  +
*I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[A-rod]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Brian Cowen}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since {{U|Dwight K Shrute}} finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:45 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Ych a fi. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830005121}}
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on [[Alex Rodriguez]]--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 29-Aug-13</small>
+
|comments={{Comment}}Feel it should stay in some format but current version is largely abuse. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:12, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Keep}} Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
+
*It has its funny moments even though it's mostly all abuse (although what article on a politician isn't?). I'm not going to vote to save it though. {{User:Captain gull/Sig}} 02:10, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
#:A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:37 30-Aug-13</small>
+
*:True. I think the article is just a cleaned up version of [[wikipedia:Brian Cowen|this one]].--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:15, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
#::I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
+
}}
#:Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual [[UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol]] will tell you what the big deal is.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:46 30-Aug-13</small>
+
#::I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
+
== {{VFDn|Mudripper}} ==
|delnumber=1
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=10:56, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:56 29-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Does not jump the bar. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830015929}}
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Furcadia]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Green Day}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:48, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDg|time=22:17, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#The article on a shit pop boy-band seems incomplete, and has very little real content. Most of the humour seems to be adding random words in (terrorist, president and marijuana in the first sentence alone) and consists entirely of random "jokes". I recommend it be {{Delete|deleted}}. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 22:17, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:11, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{delete|their albums that were then printed on a mixture of shit, jizz, snot rockets, fingernail clippings and blood.}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831172757}}
  +
#{{Delete}} The humor is all random, except for one recourse to [[No one cares]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:34 31-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:08, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} '''I''' took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor [[User:Kotra|kotra]] wasn't the subject of it. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
|comments=
#:I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 24-Aug-13</small>
+
}}
#{{Pacman}} The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
== {{VFDn|Slackware}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 24-Aug-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:55 30-Aug-14</small>
#{{Delete}} What did you find there? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{delete|He invented what we call today, "water"}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831173146}}
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|My ingenious plan to attack Obama with non-lethal weapons}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=20:42, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=1
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
+
#{{Delete}} Created during the week [[John McCain]] stated that it wouldn't be the end of the world if Obama were elected. Not exactly Assassination Humor, but has the same problems and is fatally unclever. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:42 1-Sep-14</small>
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
|keepnumber=0
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
|keep=
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
|comments=
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
}}

Latest revision as of 20:42, September 1, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Johnson County, Kansas H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 490 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. Spıke ¬ 10:31 12-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Small town Kansas Kruft. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. Rocketsled (talk) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. Spıke ¬ 15:01 24-Aug-14
  • There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:41, 30 Aug 2014

edit Office etiquette H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 473 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that this is a humor wiki. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 03:02 13-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. ConCass2 (talk) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. One liners. Not good.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. I laughed. I don't know why, but I did. Quite a bit, actually. I'm so sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:28, 30 Aug 2014
    Clarification: I found many of the etiquette tips to be funny, but the intro and some tips seem to be serious. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:42, 30 Aug 2014
Comments
  • Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. Rocketsled (talk) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. Spıke ¬ 11:58 17-Aug-14
    I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. ConCass2 (talk) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
  • Moonhead42 is trying to save this. I say on his talk page that it needs more drastic surgery; voters, feel free to kibitz. Spıke ¬ 11:21 30-Aug-14
    I hate to say it, but I kind of prefer it before his changes. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 02:48, 31 Aug 2014
    His initial edits were more-of-the-same, but yesterday he seemed to take up my challenge to remedy the overdependence on lists. Spıke ¬ 09:54 31-Aug-14

edit Johnny Gay H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 354 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. Spıke ¬ 01:45 18-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not very funny and not notable enough. I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to this YouTube video. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. Spıke ¬ 14:08 18-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Thanks for the meme-ory. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Blah. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:29, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The sprites are missing from this article. No idea what's going on. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:47, 30 Aug 2014

edit Lahore H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 321 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. Spıke ¬ 11:38 19-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Short and sucky. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:17, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Dolphin uprising H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 271 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see Emu War and Animals with feet war with animals with no feet. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of Sunoco is a waste of time, except to key us to Category:Silly wars, where other VFD fodder may be found. Spıke ¬ 12:09 25-Aug-14
  3. Silly wars? We don't need no silly wars. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 03:33, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I think it's a funny article that goes well with mine. I don't get why you think that "personal story arcs" are so evil, in this case I believe that continuity between some of the articles improves them overall.The preceding unsigned comment was added by SamTheAwesome (talk • contribs)
    I can't speak for Spike, but I think continuity is ok as long as the articles are high quality. I also think your article is somewhat funny, for whatever it's worth (which probably isn't a whole lot) and better than Dolphin uprising. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:13, 30 Aug 2014
    Anything is OK as long as an article is of sufficiently high quality. The problem with story arcs is this: Humor is the highest value for an Uncyclopedian considering new edits to an article; and declining to apply an edit because SamTheAwesome wants Dolphin uprising to make sense when read alongside The Great Whale Invasion is a gigantic non-issue with which to burden any Uncyclopedian. Spıke ¬ 00:46 30-Aug-14
Comments
  • New Uncyclopedian SamTheAwesome has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new The Great Whale Invasion (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. Spıke ¬ 13:08 21-Aug-14

edit United Socialist States of America H T D Survivor

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 262 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. Spıke ¬ 22:21 21-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not horrible but too far from the truth to be funny, IMHO. Just kind of dull, really. Snarglefoop (talk) 23:29, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ConCass2 made it a bit better, but it's still not great. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 02:47, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. ConCass2 (talk) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
    One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) Spıke ¬ 12:14 25-Aug-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. [1], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. Spıke ¬ 13:12 22-Aug-14
  • I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. ConCass2 (talk) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

edit Brian Cowen H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 191 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. ConCass2 (talk) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since Dwight K Shrute finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. Spıke ¬ 21:45 24-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Ych a fi. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:51, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Symbol comment vote Comment.Feel it should stay in some format but current version is largely abuse. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:12, August 29, 2014 (UTC)

  • It has its funny moments even though it's mostly all abuse (although what article on a politician isn't?). I'm not going to vote to save it though. Capt. Gull (talk) 02:10, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
    True. I think the article is just a cleaned up version of this one.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:15, August 31, 2014 (UTC)

edit Mudripper H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 81 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. Spıke ¬ 10:56 29-Aug-14
  2. Does not jump the bar. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 01:59, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Green Day H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 46 hours
Delete (5)
  1. The article on a shit pop boy-band seems incomplete, and has very little real content. Most of the humour seems to be adding random words in (terrorist, president and marijuana in the first sentence alone) and consists entirely of random "jokes". I recommend it be Symbol delete vote deleted. ConCass2 (talk) 22:17, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:11, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote their albums that were then printed on a mixture of shit, jizz, snot rockets, fingernail clippings and blood. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 17:27, 31 Aug 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. The humor is all random, except for one recourse to No one cares. Spıke ¬ 18:34 31-Aug-14
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:08, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Slackware H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 44 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. Spıke ¬ 23:55 30-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote He invented what we call today, "water" -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 17:31, 31 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit My ingenious plan to attack Obama with non-lethal weapons H T D Tag article

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 0 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Created during the week John McCain stated that it wouldn't be the end of the world if Obama were elected. Not exactly Assassination Humor, but has the same problems and is fatally unclever. Spıke ¬ 20:42 1-Sep-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects