Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Vocaloid)
({{VFDn|Ukrainian Nazi Party}}: new section)
 
(5,664 intermediate revisions by 93 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Chyna}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=23:18, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=5
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:18 7-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} I gave up after the first sentence. [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] ([[User talk:BrokenKnives|talk]]) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I'm with [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] on this one. I maybe got a ''little'' further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{For}} A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#:Why? Is the article internet famous? {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|A Day at the Barn with Hitler}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=01:55, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
== [[Vocaloid]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by {{U|Thetoastman}} in 2006. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:55 10-May-15</small>
|keepnumber=1
+
#{{Delete}} If it is not original work, it should go.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:05 a very good year
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete}} Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. [[User:Chaoarren|Chaoarren]] ([[User talk:Chaoarren|talk]]) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Boombot}} This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! {{User:Newman66/sig}} 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
#Thïs entry is not recording my "Keep" vote. Please look in the edit" and you will see it there. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:10 also a very good year
+
*This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
#:It now is. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:36, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
*:To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:40 10-May-15</small>
  +
*::Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:31 25-May-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDc|N.W.A.}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Labor Party}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 7-Sep-13</small>
 
#:Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:: It is File:Nwa4px.gif. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:::Now restored, but only used once in the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
#<s>{{Delete|Article with attitude}} It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
#:Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*'''Vote closed'''--nomination withdrawn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister in Chains|Aleister in Chains]] 19:00 in these parts
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin {{U|Mnbvcxz}} (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:58 11-May-15</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Not to be confused with [[Labour Party (UK)]]. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*Not to be confused with the Labor Party in Australia either. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:30, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Worst 100 Porn Stars of All Time]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Al Qaeda Chicken}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=13:37, May 24, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 24-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Not really worth keeping, is it? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 5-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} NOW! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:26 6-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Exterminate}} I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{Tl|USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:15 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#::You do? And how about [[Minitrue]]? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
* On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual [[KFC]] article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Hot dog]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=13:41, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A chatty article about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:41 25-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Bearded dragon]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Hemorrhoid}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
#{{Keep}} As I voted [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive227#Bearded_dragon|in 2011]]. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (''Pogona barbata'') is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:48 1-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I gave it a bit more, relating it to [[Samson]] and the [[bearded clam]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:07 2-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Admin {{U|Zim ulator}} swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 25-May-15</small>
  +
#:Sorry, I guess the final word does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 25-May-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[A-rod]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Ukrainian Nazi Party}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=19:48, May 26, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on [[Alex Rodriguez]]--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 29-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:37 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual [[UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol]] will tell you what the big deal is.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:46 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{Delete}} Nothing comparable on Wikipedia. Twelve different external links. It feels as though author wants me to read all the available evidence to support his point, which still isn't funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:48 26-May-15</small>
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=0
}}
 
 
== [[Furcadia]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:48, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} '''I''' took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor [[User:Kotra|kotra]] wasn't the subject of it. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Pacman}} The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What did you find there? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 19:48, May 26, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Chyna H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 477 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). Spıke Ѧ 23:18 7-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I gave up after the first sentence. BrokenKnives (talk) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm with BrokenKnives on this one. I maybe got a little further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol for vote For. A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
    Why? Is the article internet famous? SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit A Day at the Barn with Hitler H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 426 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by Thetoastman in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:55 10-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it is not original work, it should go.--EStop (talk) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
    To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 10-May-15
    Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --EStop (talk) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
    If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 18:31 25-May-15

edit Labor Party H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 414 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin Mnbvcxz (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 11-May-15
Comments

edit Al Qaeda Chicken H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 78 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. Spıke Ѧ 13:37 24-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual KFC article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

edit What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 54 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A chatty article about nothing. Spıke Ѧ 13:41 25-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hemorrhoid H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 46 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Admin Zim ulator swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. Spıke Ѧ 23:04 25-May-15
    Sorry, I guess the final word does. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 25-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Ukrainian Nazi Party H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 24 hours
Delete (1)

Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing comparable on Wikipedia. Twelve different external links. It feels as though author wants me to read all the available evidence to support his point, which still isn't funny. Spıke Ѧ 19:48 26-May-15

Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects