Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Vocaloid)
({{VFDn|Bush Family}}: to archive)
 
(5,246 intermediate revisions by 82 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Red Screen of Death}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=01:56, January 17, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
 
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
 
 
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
 
 
== [[Vocaloid]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:05 a very good year
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete}} Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. [[User:Chaoarren|Chaoarren]] ([[User talk:Chaoarren|talk]]) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} You see, the reader who knows the expression "Blue Screen of Death" will naturally type "Red Screen of Death" to see if we happen to have such an article. And will encounter Sandbox-quality drivel. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:56 17-Jan-15</small>
#{{Boombot}} This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! {{User:Newman66/sig}} 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:35, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=0
#Thïs entry is not recording my "Keep" vote. Please look in the edit" and you will see it there. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:10 also a very good year
 
#:It now is. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:36, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=={{VFDc|N.W.A.}} ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 7-Sep-13</small>
 
#:Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:: It is File:Nwa4px.gif. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:::Now restored, but only used once in the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
#<s>{{Delete|Article with attitude}} It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
#:Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*'''Vote closed'''--nomination withdrawn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Air Force Slang}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister in Chains|Aleister in Chains]] 19:00 in these parts
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Worst 100 Porn Stars of All Time]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=22:47, January 20, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not really worth keeping, is it? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} It's that time of year; let's try again. '''No original humor''' anywhere, just a catalog of already-funny things that other people say elsewhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:47 20-Jan-15</small>
#{{Delete}} The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Painfully long list and not funny. [[User:Adamwashere|Adamwashere]] ([[User talk:Adamwashere|talk]]) 03:04, January 21, 2015 (UTC)Adamwashere
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Obliterate}} Which is my preferred term over nuke for quotes and lists. [[User:Ye Blacke Adder|Ye Blacke Adder]] ([[User talk:Ye Blacke Adder|talk]]) 14:58, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} NOW! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:26 6-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Exterminate}} I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{Tl|USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:15 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#::You do? And how about [[Minitrue]]? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Hot dog]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Looks like it has been posted in from elsewhere. Best person to ask is user {{u|RAF Packington}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:40, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:And what would I ask him? I stipulate that these are witty things that airmen say, and still think the article should go. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:57 21-Jan-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Bearded dragon]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Puck's Potion}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} As I voted [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive227#Bearded_dragon|in 2011]]. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (''Pogona barbata'') is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:48 1-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I gave it a bit more, relating it to [[Samson]] and the [[bearded clam]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:07 2-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[A-rod]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=01:32, January 26, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on [[Alex Rodriguez]]--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 29-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:37 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual [[UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol]] will tell you what the big deal is.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:46 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|Not notable.}} An article about a play written and performed at a certain high school, on the site since 2005. Being updated as the same high school plans to perform it again. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:32 26-Jan-15</small>
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Local playcruft? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:52, January 26, 2015 (UTC)
}}
+
|keepnumber=0
 
== [[Furcadia]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:48, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} '''I''' took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor [[User:Kotra|kotra]] wasn't the subject of it. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Pacman}} The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 24-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What did you find there? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 15:21, January 26, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Red Screen of Death H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 279 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. You see, the reader who knows the expression "Blue Screen of Death" will naturally type "Red Screen of Death" to see if we happen to have such an article. And will encounter Sandbox-quality drivel. Spıke Ѧ 01:56 17-Jan-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:35, January 23, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Air Force Slang H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 186 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's that time of year; let's try again. No original humor anywhere, just a catalog of already-funny things that other people say elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 22:47 20-Jan-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Painfully long list and not funny. Adamwashere (talk) 03:04, January 21, 2015 (UTC)Adamwashere
  3. Nuclear Explosion Seal Obliterate. Which is my preferred term over nuke for quotes and lists. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 14:58, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Looks like it has been posted in from elsewhere. Best person to ask is user RAF Packington --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:40, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
    And what would I ask him? I stipulate that these are witty things that airmen say, and still think the article should go. Spıke Ѧ 14:57 21-Jan-15

edit Puck's Potion H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 63 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Not notable. An article about a play written and performed at a certain high school, on the site since 2005. Being updated as the same high school plans to perform it again. Spıke Ѧ 01:32 26-Jan-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Local playcruft? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:52, January 26, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects