Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Vocaloid)
({{VFDn|Sudden Instant Death Syndrome}}: Deleted)
 
(5,030 intermediate revisions by 74 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Vietnamese}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDg|time=17:42, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --[[User:Precious Star|Precious Star]] ([[User talk:Precious Star|talk]]) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:05 20-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Just when you think all the ancient junk has gone...this one pops up! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:43, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#An attempt to look nice at the expense of anything remotely intelligent. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141122000235}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Chav/Translations}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDg|time=17:28, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=5
== [[Vocaloid]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:05 a very good year
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete}} Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. [[User:Chaoarren|Chaoarren]] ([[User talk:Chaoarren|talk]]) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} I don't think this is particularly funny or worth keeping. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:28, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Boombot}} This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! {{User:Newman66/sig}} 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Various editors (overwhelmingly Anons) have used this overlong list to catalog the "funny" things that chavs say rather than write original humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:52 21-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} The same joke repeated hundreds of times --[[User:Precious Star|Precious Star]] ([[User talk:Precious Star|talk]]) 19:26, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Flypaper. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:46, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Can't tell if all this stuff is even about chavs at all. In any case, it's not of much use. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141122000658}}
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
#Thïs entry is not recording my "Keep" vote. Please look in the edit" and you will see it there. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:10 also a very good year
 
#:It now is. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:36, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=={{VFDc|N.W.A.}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|SEHS}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 7-Sep-13</small>
 
#:Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:: It is File:Nwa4px.gif. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:::Now restored, but only used once in the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
#<s>{{Delete|Article with attitude}} It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)</s>
 
#:Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*'''Vote closed'''--nomination withdrawn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:30 8-Sep-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== [[Perrin Aybara]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:15, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=21:23, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. [[user:Aleister in Chains|Aleister in Chains]] 19:00 in these parts
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I am not convinced that Anon today at [[Talk:Perrin Aybara]] ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:23 5-Sep-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} SEHS being "Sudden Head Exploding Syndrome," a Wacky Ailment with which to piggyback off [[A splode]] in this article from 2005, which has little to say about the ailment no one will look up except that it runs in things — and American politicians — the authors don't happen to like. Before deleting the external links, I didn't follow them, so I can't say whether this entire Syndrome was invented at an external website, as our recent "Dihydrogen monoxide" was. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:15 22-Nov-14</small>
|comments=
+
#Unlike [[Dihydrogen monoxide]], this doesn't deserve an article. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123001312}}
}}
+
#{{Delete}} It's not terrible, but it's not good either. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 02:22, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
 
== [[Worst 100 Porn Stars of All Time]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Not really worth keeping, is it? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 5-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} NOW! {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:26 6-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Exterminate}} I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{Tl|USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:15 8-Sep-13</small>
 
#::You do? And how about [[Minitrue]]? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Hot dog]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Sudden Instant Death Syndrome}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:56, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDg|time=00:25, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#From the redundant and made-up title to the random lists of nonsensical items such as masturbating kittens, this article is about essentially nothing. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123002536}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Dead Baby Humor has to be especially good to be funny. This article, by comparison, uses most of the trite themes in the book: Author discussing himself, author apparently with A.D.D., "nobody knows anything," listcruft, memecruft, history-of-the-future, and another list of Notable Sufferers, inviting cyberbullying and not being disappointed in the response. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:16 23-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Stupid. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 02:14, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} HowTo:Not write an article {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 06:04, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny at all. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 23:54, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a [[penis]], something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to [[Dogshit sandwich]] would kill two birds with one stone. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:56 2-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Agreed. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*It hardly discusses babies anyway. Only two paragraphs at the end. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123013038}}
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Bearded dragon]] ==
+
== {{VFDc|Samuel L. Vacuum}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} As I voted [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive227#Bearded_dragon|in 2011]]. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (''Pogona barbata'') is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:48 1-Sep-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--[[User:Sog1970|Sog1970]] ([[User talk:Sog1970|talk]]) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I gave it a bit more, relating it to [[Samson]] and the [[bearded clam]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:07 2-Sep-13</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[A-rod]] ==
+
{{VFDg|time=00:32, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on [[Alex Rodriguez]]--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 29-Aug-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:37 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual [[UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol]] will tell you what the big deal is.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:46 30-Aug-13</small>
 
#::I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Article begins with an unimpressive sentence, explains in tedious detail why said unimpressive sentence is a comedic masterpiece, and ends with a gratuitous instance of {{tl|USERNAME}}. Was voted onto the front page by a group of editors who are mostly no longer here. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123003229}}
|comments=
+
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} Yes, it was a feature, a VFD moved to VFH by fallen-away editors who reveled in their freedom to feature a thoroughly bad article. That was not amusing the reader but self-amusement, a prank not a joke, and that goes for the article as well. No one will look for this transformation of Samuel L. Jackson's name, no one will laugh at the emphasis on Jackson's blackness, and after that sentence, no one will enjoy author's essay about trying to write an article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:21 23-Nov-14</small>
}}
+
#{{Delete}} Considering that there are already two save votes, this article probably won't go. But I reckon that this article would be much funnier if it were actually ''about'' Samuel L Vacuum as opposed to plain navelism along the lines of "here's why it's funny". [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
+
#:It was about Samuel L. Vacuum before it was rewritten to be about how terrible that concept was; see Comments. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123170359}}
== [[Furcadia]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:48, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} '''I''' took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor [[User:Kotra|kotra]] wasn't the subject of it. [[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]] ([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]]) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep|A Classic.}} Hilarious and clever. This is not about writing an Uncyclopedia article. It's a parody of comedy writing in general and critique of the overuse of memes in place of actual jokes. This was one of the first articles I read on Uncyclopedia and one of the first to get me interested in this site, so I would think that there are others who find it amusing as well. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 02:21, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
#:I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 24-Aug-13</small>
+
#:Mocking bad writing by imitating it simply produces a bad page. Your apparent knowledge of the point of this pointless article is not evident by reading the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:36 23-Nov-14</small>
#{{Pacman}} The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep|New low.}} Deleting featured articles? Petty petty. I don't particularly like it but enough people voted for it to highlight the site that you can't outright delete it. --[[User:Nikau|Nikau]] ([[User talk:Nikau|talk]]) 06:28, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
|delnumber=3
+
#:Some featured articles can be utter shite. This one isn't terrible, but if it was exactly as it is now and didn't have the "featured" at the top, it would be VFD material. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=
+
#::This vote ought to be disregarded because it is based not on the quality of the article, but on an objection to the policy. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123170235}}
#{{Delete}} A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:48 24-Aug-13</small>
+
#:::More problematic is disparaging fellow voters ("Petty petty"), a trend I thought had stopped when Shabidoo threw his Wikia pass-key down the gutter. However, you started it with the comment below, which suggests that a goal was to purge the site of a specific author. I famously enforce civility not with creative vote counting but with the ban-stick. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:25 23-Nov-14</small>
#{{Delete}} Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
+
#::::I find it ironic that you would call Nikau's comment one that disparages other users and at the same time call my opinion of the article "apparent knowledge" that "is not evident by reading the article." That's a tad belittling, wouldn't you say? --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:17, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} What did you find there? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:::No I wouldn't, not ironic, not disparaging, and not belittling. I asserted that your statement about the point of the article is not evident from reading the article, that's all. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:18 23-Nov-14</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*While it was created by {{u|Evilcorporatemetaljesus}}, it was [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Samuel_L._Vacuum?diff=3315753&oldid=3294717 rewritten] by {{u|Mrmonkey72}}. Adding this because its original creator was mentioned in another discussion as having written this and other poor-quality articles. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123004021}}
  +
*The current policy at Uncyclopedia is to protect featured articles. If anyone feels strongly about this then a forum can be created to discuss it there. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:36, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*24 hours hasn't yet elapsed. Other articles are allowed more time; shouldn't this stay open a tad longer? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123231105}}
  +
:FA's don't go to VFD; that is a long standing policy. This matter can be discussed in a forum if required. I would vote to keep this one regardless as evidently lots of people found it funny at one point. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 11:39, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 00:16, November 25, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Llwy-ar-lawr • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Vietnamese H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 200 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --Precious Star (talk) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. Spıke ¬ 18:05 20-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. ConCass2 (talk) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just when you think all the ancient junk has gone...this one pops up! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:43, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. An attempt to look nice at the expense of anything remotely intelligent. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:02 22 Nov 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Chav/Translations H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 176 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't think this is particularly funny or worth keeping. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:28, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Various editors (overwhelmingly Anons) have used this overlong list to catalog the "funny" things that chavs say rather than write original humor. Spıke ¬ 17:52 21-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The same joke repeated hundreds of times --Precious Star (talk) 19:26, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Flypaper. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:46, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Can't tell if all this stuff is even about chavs at all. In any case, it's not of much use. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:06 22 Nov 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit SEHS H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 149 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. SEHS being "Sudden Head Exploding Syndrome," a Wacky Ailment with which to piggyback off A splode in this article from 2005, which has little to say about the ailment no one will look up except that it runs in things — and American politicians — the authors don't happen to like. Before deleting the external links, I didn't follow them, so I can't say whether this entire Syndrome was invented at an external website, as our recent "Dihydrogen monoxide" was. Spıke ¬ 21:15 22-Nov-14
  2. Unlike Dihydrogen monoxide, this doesn't deserve an article. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:13 23 Nov 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's not terrible, but it's not good either. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:22, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Sudden Instant Death Syndrome H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 145 hours
Delete (5)
  1. From the redundant and made-up title to the random lists of nonsensical items such as masturbating kittens, this article is about essentially nothing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:25 23 Nov 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Dead Baby Humor has to be especially good to be funny. This article, by comparison, uses most of the trite themes in the book: Author discussing himself, author apparently with A.D.D., "nobody knows anything," listcruft, memecruft, history-of-the-future, and another list of Notable Sufferers, inviting cyberbullying and not being disappointed in the response. Spıke ¬ 01:16 23-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Stupid. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:14, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. HowTo:Not write an article ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 06:04, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny at all. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:54, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It hardly discusses babies anyway. Only two paragraphs at the end. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:30 23 Nov 2014

edit 🔒 Samuel L. Vacuum H T D Survivor Oldvfd Archive

Score: 1 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 145 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Article begins with an unimpressive sentence, explains in tedious detail why said unimpressive sentence is a comedic masterpiece, and ends with a gratuitous instance of {{USERNAME}}. Was voted onto the front page by a group of editors who are mostly no longer here. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:32 23 Nov 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Navelism. Yes, it was a feature, a VFD moved to VFH by fallen-away editors who reveled in their freedom to feature a thoroughly bad article. That was not amusing the reader but self-amusement, a prank not a joke, and that goes for the article as well. No one will look for this transformation of Samuel L. Jackson's name, no one will laugh at the emphasis on Jackson's blackness, and after that sentence, no one will enjoy author's essay about trying to write an article. Spıke ¬ 01:21 23-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Considering that there are already two save votes, this article probably won't go. But I reckon that this article would be much funnier if it were actually about Samuel L Vacuum as opposed to plain navelism along the lines of "here's why it's funny". ConCass2 (talk) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    It was about Samuel L. Vacuum before it was rewritten to be about how terrible that concept was; see Comments. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:03 23 Nov 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote A Classic. Hilarious and clever. This is not about writing an Uncyclopedia article. It's a parody of comedy writing in general and critique of the overuse of memes in place of actual jokes. This was one of the first articles I read on Uncyclopedia and one of the first to get me interested in this site, so I would think that there are others who find it amusing as well. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:21, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    Mocking bad writing by imitating it simply produces a bad page. Your apparent knowledge of the point of this pointless article is not evident by reading the article. Spıke ¬ 14:36 23-Nov-14
  2. Symbol keep vote New low. Deleting featured articles? Petty petty. I don't particularly like it but enough people voted for it to highlight the site that you can't outright delete it. --Nikau (talk) 06:28, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    Some featured articles can be utter shite. This one isn't terrible, but if it was exactly as it is now and didn't have the "featured" at the top, it would be VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    This vote ought to be disregarded because it is based not on the quality of the article, but on an objection to the policy. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:02 23 Nov 2014
    More problematic is disparaging fellow voters ("Petty petty"), a trend I thought had stopped when Shabidoo threw his Wikia pass-key down the gutter. However, you started it with the comment below, which suggests that a goal was to purge the site of a specific author. I famously enforce civility not with creative vote counting but with the ban-stick. Spıke ¬ 17:25 23-Nov-14
    I find it ironic that you would call Nikau's comment one that disparages other users and at the same time call my opinion of the article "apparent knowledge" that "is not evident by reading the article." That's a tad belittling, wouldn't you say? --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:17, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    No I wouldn't, not ironic, not disparaging, and not belittling. I asserted that your statement about the point of the article is not evident from reading the article, that's all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 23-Nov-14
Comments
  • While it was created by Evilcorporatemetaljesus, it was rewritten by Mrmonkey72. Adding this because its original creator was mentioned in another discussion as having written this and other poor-quality articles. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:40 23 Nov 2014
  • The current policy at Uncyclopedia is to protect featured articles. If anyone feels strongly about this then a forum can be created to discuss it there. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:36, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  • 24 hours hasn't yet elapsed. Other articles are allowed more time; shouldn't this stay open a tad longer? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:11 23 Nov 2014
FA's don't go to VFD; that is a long standing policy. This matter can be discussed in a forum if required. I would vote to keep this one regardless as evidently lots of people found it funny at one point. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:39, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects