Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(archiving)
({{VFDn|Ben Ten}})
 
(6,362 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Never-Ending Story}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDg|time=08:19, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Image-free randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never compose while on drugs. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:42 10-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Felt like it would never end. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=20:55, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>20:55 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The only salvageable parts were the intro and what it is made of, but that's not enough to justify keeping the whole thing. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:20, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
== Deletion of bad articles on British cities and towns ==
+
== {{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}} ==
See [[Forum:A big British clean-up]] for details.
 
   
== [[List of real life hacks and cheat codes‎‎]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=22:08, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=01:50, June 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} 2010 author {{U|Weri long wang}} writes the opposite of the plot of ''Atlas Shrugged,'' then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:08 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Title good but following article crap. I will take a bold punt and suggest the writer has never read any Marx. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:38, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
+
|comments=
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Denza and I watched Anon blank sections and we discussed this ambiguously. I claim this is not an essential article of an encyclopedia but an effort by gamers to document and inform, not to amuse, even though there is some token wackiness thrown in. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:50 17-Jun-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}}Per above. But some things are okay, so I may create a userspace bit for some of the content for later user. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig2}} 02:01, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*After glancing at the page for a minute I thought that it had a nice concept and that the list form couldn't be avoided. I won't decide to vote keep until I have read it however I do not see much wrong with it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:30, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Spaghetti]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Who Do You Think}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=02:57, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#No redeeming value as far as I can tell {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:20 28-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Baffling gibberish. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Only after reading the talk page, did I kind of get the author's concept. The reader should not have to do that, especially if the piece is still no more amusing or comprehensible. Obscure nonsense. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:19, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Relies on the sheer weirdness of how it is written, but has nothing else going for it. I get the impression that the author is [[Bat Fuck Insane|insane]], and/or trying to write some strange song lyrics (the repetitive table at the end could be the chorus...what do you think?). {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 07:04, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} A wasteland of lists and of nonsense numbers, stopping briefly to rant about the victuals served at the SJHSM cafeteria. I bring this here hoping that one of Uncyclopedia's gourmands will step forward and save it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:57 16-Jun-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Perhaps someone could make a How To: Cook Spahgetti. Right now there isn't much of an article, but lots of list. Needs (completely) rewritten or deleted in my opinion. --[[User:Uncycloperson|Uncycloperson]] ([[User talk:Uncycloperson|talk]]) 03:47, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Too listy, I thought that there would be much more humor on spaghetti. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig2}} 04:11, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Who knew it took 69.696969696969696969696969696961 whole seconds to marinate bagels? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 18:34, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Sheffield]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=23:27, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=03:35, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=4
#{{Keep}} To be clear, Sheffield has 6 Members of Parliament, including deputy prime minister Nick Clegg but not including Nigel Farage. Using Farage as a meme is inexplicable but might be an attempt at a running joke, and doesn't by itself disqualify the article. Topical humor is better than random humor; but the question is not whether this is the best anyone can do but whether it is truly awful. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:26 15-Jun-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} IT needs a bit of care and attention, nothing more. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:19, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Unfunny article. Heavily references politician Nigel Farage despite no visible links between him and the city, and contains little in the way of humour related to the place itself. Certainly no better than the numerous deleted incarnations of the page that have preceded it. -- {{User:Rabies Turtle/sig}} 23:27, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>03:35 30-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Sexist and unfunny. Finishes off with a crappy list. No redeeming qualities. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:24, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never funny in a million years. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:31, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Awful. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:23, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Adventure Quest]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get a boner}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=20:23, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=02:56, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} I actually thought this was alright, possibly in the territory of one of our other tags but certainly not in the dark and sticky realms of VFD. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 06:46, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not funny. Pretty true. Makes me fall asleep.--[[User:Uncycloperson|Uncycloperson]] ([[User talk:Uncycloperson|talk]]) 20:23, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} No humor except the glee of writing to strangers about sex. It is a chore maintaining the 2012 page of {{U|SecondChanceForMe}} against continual vandalism. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:56 5-Jul-15</small>
#{{Delete}} The author of this article was trying to be funny, but is trying harder to evangelize than amuse. The humor is along the lines of, "Everybody look at how wacky we gamers are!" {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:07 11-Jun-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} I'm sure there is a funny and clever article that could written with this subject header, but this isn't it.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:31, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Might as well get rid of it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 21:26, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} An article with a promising title/concept, but poorly executed. Deserves a complete rewrite. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 06:56, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Nominator got this in before Simsie slapped the {{Tl|Fix}} on the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:07 11-Jun-13</small>
 
*{{Abstain}}Hmm, I think this is another salvageable article, like [[spam]], so if it is okay, I could move it to my userspace, and work on it a bit. As much as I dislike Adventure Quest, this is a perfectly valid article topic, but the writing needs work. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig2}} 18:18, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:As this vote is not a slam-dunk, for now copy the code to a page in your userspace if you like. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:52 19-Jun-13</small>
 
*If you can fix it, do it, but on the main wiki it does not belong. Quite boring until fixed.--[[User:Uncycloperson|Uncycloperson]] ([[User talk:Uncycloperson|talk]]) 00:06, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Checkpoint Charlie]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dissociative Identity Disorder}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=22:13, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=4
#{{Keep}} I sort of quite liked the concept, mainly that German is the last, and smallest, of the languages. I accept it's likely to be a target for vandals, but if there were some way of forcing people looking for Berlin to go through the page it'd be quite good. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 23:06, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} I see where the Reverend's coming from it is an intended spoof of the sign and in my mind it works. Perhaps more paragraphs could be added like the history of the sign but at the moment it stands as one of those non-encyclopedic ones that can be accepted because as they are funny. Perhaps it some of the languages the words could actually read phrases that are stereotypical of that country's way of speaking or are that country's stereotype of Americans. For example as a joke add a British English language translation and an Aussie one. The joke works for people who know what Checkpoint Charlie is and a helpful wikipedia template has been provided by author. I do not think the picture is needed but instead a photoshopped version in which the writing on the page is put onto with the picture filling up the page. I will attempt to rewrite how I think the article could look better in my user space however for the moment it is funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:00, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I have begun working on a potential replacement (if wanted/necessary) [[User:ScottPat/Checkpoint Charlie|here]]. Any comments on my talk page or the talk page of that article or below would be appreciated. Thanks. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:35, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It seems that, at one time, to reach the Uncyclopedia article [[Berlin]], you had to pass through [[Checkpoint Charlie]]. This is no longer true. (There is no Checkpoint Charlie any more, nor East Berlin, nor [[East Berlin]]). All that is left is the same phrase translated into various languages including Cherokee. If there is clandestine humor, English speakers will never know. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:13 10-Jun-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} (Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder, just so you all know.) To get the joke you have to visit the revision history, to see that the article was written largely by a single user who with every revision wrote about a different thing with a different style, sometimes reverting himself (and calling his own contributions vandalism). The idea wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that the reader has no clue what this is about, unless he randomly checks the page's history or talkpage. Also, none of the revisions are very well written, I find. Finally, (albeit it's of a minor concern compared to the rest), the disorder isn't portrayed particularly well. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} WTF? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:33, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I don't even see the invisible hand that Nominator does, but that author {{U|So So}} used this as a sandbox. His various projects and a few of Anon's could be thought of as a collective Dissociative Identity, but I agree that this isn't obvious to most readers. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:45 6-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Another nonsense article (that is not even an article), that nobody will bother trying to figure out. It would have at least made more sense if each personality change was on one page, so the reader can see the dysfunction. The various personalities are barely described either, just cheesy lines left for the reader to try to figure out. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:46, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The page is protected, so I couldn't add {VFD}. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|Ben Ten}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=19:32, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=3
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
+
#{{Delete}} Found this browsing "Categories with insufficient links". A few lines about a cartoon character that was only started, then abandoned since Sep 2013. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:32, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
#{{Delete}} No one is going to look or finish this. Curtail. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:25, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
#{{Delete}} There's practically nothing here. If we really need an article on this, then someone will hopefully recreate it with more material later. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:42, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
|keepnumber=0
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 23:42, July 7, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Never-Ending Story H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 663 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Image-free randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never compose while on drugs. Spıke Ѧ 11:42 10-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Felt like it would never end. --EStop (talk) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 386 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. The only salvageable parts were the intro and what it is made of, but that's not enough to justify keeping the whole thing. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:20, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 385 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Title good but following article crap. I will take a bold punt and suggest the writer has never read any Marx. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:38, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Who Do You Think H T D

Score: 5
Elapsed Time: 225 hours
Delete (5)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Only after reading the talk page, did I kind of get the author's concept. The reader should not have to do that, especially if the piece is still no more amusing or comprehensible. Obscure nonsense. --EStop (talk) 09:19, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Relies on the sheer weirdness of how it is written, but has nothing else going for it. I get the impression that the author is insane, and/or trying to write some strange song lyrics (the repetitive table at the end could be the chorus...what do you think?). Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 07:04, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 188 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sexist and unfunny. Finishes off with a crappy list. No redeeming qualities. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:24, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never funny in a million years. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:31, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. --EStop (talk) 09:23, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Get a boner H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 68 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No humor except the glee of writing to strangers about sex. It is a chore maintaining the 2012 page of SecondChanceForMe against continual vandalism. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:56 5-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm sure there is a funny and clever article that could written with this subject header, but this isn't it.--EStop (talk) 09:31, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. An article with a promising title/concept, but poorly executed. Deserves a complete rewrite. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 06:56, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Dissociative Identity Disorder H T D Survivor

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 53 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. (Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder, just so you all know.) To get the joke you have to visit the revision history, to see that the article was written largely by a single user who with every revision wrote about a different thing with a different style, sometimes reverting himself (and calling his own contributions vandalism). The idea wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that the reader has no clue what this is about, unless he randomly checks the page's history or talkpage. Also, none of the revisions are very well written, I find. Finally, (albeit it's of a minor concern compared to the rest), the disorder isn't portrayed particularly well. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. WTF? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:33, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't even see the invisible hand that Nominator does, but that author So So used this as a sandbox. His various projects and a few of Anon's could be thought of as a collective Dissociative Identity, but I agree that this isn't obvious to most readers. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:45 6-Jul-15
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another nonsense article (that is not even an article), that nobody will bother trying to figure out. It would have at least made more sense if each personality change was on one page, so the reader can see the dysfunction. The various personalities are barely described either, just cheesy lines left for the reader to try to figure out. --EStop (talk) 09:46, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The page is protected, so I couldn't add {VFD}. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)

edit Ben Ten H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 4 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Found this browsing "Categories with insufficient links". A few lines about a cartoon character that was only started, then abandoned since Sep 2013. --EStop (talk) 19:32, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. No one is going to look or finish this. Curtail. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. There's practically nothing here. If we really need an article on this, then someone will hopefully recreate it with more material later. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:42, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects