Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(archiving)
({{VFDn|Nexon}})
 
(4,670 intermediate revisions by 75 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Johnson County, Kansas}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=10:31, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:31 12-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Small town Kansas Kruft. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A very large amount of text that is also dull. ([[User talk:Moonhead42]]) 6:13, September 3rd, 2014
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:01 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
*There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004137}}
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Mudripper}} ==
   
<!--PUT NEW NOMINATIONS RIGHT BELOW THIS LINE, AND DON'T BE TRIPLE-SPACING BETWEEN NOMINATIONS --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=10:56, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:56 29-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Does not jump the bar. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830015929}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Looks like disguised group vanity. I searched this term and it points back here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:39, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:Moonhead42|Moonhead 42]] ([[User talk:Moonhead42|talk]]) 23:51, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
== Deletion of bad articles on British cities and towns ==
+
== {{VFDn|Slackware}} ==
See [[Forum:A big British clean-up]] for details.
 
   
== [[List of real life hacks and cheat codes‎‎]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=01:50, June 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:55 30-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{delete|He invented what we call today, "water"}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831173146}}
  +
#{{delete}} Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
+
|comments=
  +
* And on 17 July 2007 an IP made a single edit, which was to spam an ad for Slackware into the article in a new section titled 'usage'. It sticks out like a sore thumb if you read that far. Apparently nobody noticed (maybe nobody's ever read that far in the article), since the section is still there, still just as serious and non-funny as it was the day it was plopped into the article. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 19:32, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I just read it, it isn't clear to me it's an ad, nor that it's unfunny, nor why it is funny if it is meant to be funny. A fifth Delete vote and no one has to answer this question. But you are free to try to improve an article while it is being voted on. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:51 16-Sep-14</small>
  +
*::Eh hmmm.... I just re-read it, and I think I was wrong -- that section is 'way too over the top to be a serious ad for Slackware. Microsoft uses it internally, and the Debian project uses it for their servers -- yeah right. And out here in the real world, the shuttle <s>uses</s> used IBM software, and IBM has its own version of Unix. So, I guess the author of that section took ''me'' in, at least. (And I'm still undecided on whether the article is salvageable which is why I voted neither yay nor nay.) [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 20:03, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Stanley Random Chess}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDg|time=14:38, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Denza and I watched Anon blank sections and we discussed this ambiguously. I claim this is not an essential article of an encyclopedia but an effort by gamers to document and inform, not to amuse, even though there is some token wackiness thrown in. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:50 17-Jun-13</small>
+
#{{Delete|Stanley Random Article.}} The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:38 2-Sep-14</small>
#{{Delete}}Per above. But some things are okay, so I may create a userspace bit for some of the content for later user. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig2}} 02:01, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=*After glancing at the page for a minute I thought that it had a nice concept and that the list form couldn't be avoided. I won't decide to vote keep until I have read it however I do not see much wrong with it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:30, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Confusing though somehow funny? Even so not funny enough to warrant the absurdity. [[User talk:Moonhead42]] 6:26, 3rd september.
  +
#Starts off badly and turns into an apparently serious article. The fact that it is a hoax does not suffice to make it acceptable. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140906225112}}
  +
#{{Delete}} This is ripped off from an article at ChessVariants.org, much of it copied word for word. That, and it's not especially funny. (I suppose it was originally inspired by Fischer Random Chess, which is a real game.) [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 22:20, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Spaghetti]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Hélio Castroneves}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=02:57, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDg|time=17:19, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|I am crying because i have won a lot off money, and the government, is going to steal all of it! i got to make a run for it!}} It is that dumb throughout. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:19 3-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Hey, what happened to the sprites? They're AWOL again. (Oh yeah, and the article is bad.) {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140907025049}}
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:18, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Who? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 06:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Ugh. Bad. Cross between total incoherence and an attack article. (BTW the Wikipedia article on him has some entertaining bits, including, "an Internal Revenue Service agent testified that Castroneves owed U.S. taxes on the full $5 million from Penske even though he had never actually received the money". Man that's the IRS alright.) [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 20:38, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Brick}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:23, September 5, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} A wasteland of lists and of nonsense numbers, stopping briefly to rant about the victuals served at the SJHSM cafeteria. I bring this here hoping that one of Uncyclopedia's gourmands will step forward and save it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:57 16-Jun-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} It is lists from start to end because it has no comedy strategy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:23 5-Sep-14</small>
#{{Delete}} Perhaps someone could make a How To: Cook Spahgetti. Right now there isn't much of an article, but lots of list. Needs (completely) rewritten or deleted in my opinion. --[[User:Uncycloperson|Uncycloperson]] ([[User talk:Uncycloperson|talk]]) 03:47, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
#I fixed the formatting a bit, but it didn't improve the article any. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140907134221}}
#{{Delete}} Too listy, I thought that there would be much more humor on spaghetti. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig2}} 04:11, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} It is just a list and it is not funny. [[User:TempSwampert11|TempSwampert11]] ([[User talk:TempSwampert11|talk]]) 23:38, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Who knew it took 69.696969696969696969696969696961 whole seconds to marinate bagels? {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 18:34, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Random mass of pointless falsehoods [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 21:01, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Sheffield]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Nexon}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=23:27, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=11:32, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=4
#{{Keep}} To be clear, Sheffield has 6 Members of Parliament, including deputy prime minister Nick Clegg but not including Nigel Farage. Using Farage as a meme is inexplicable but might be an attempt at a running joke, and doesn't by itself disqualify the article. Topical humor is better than random humor; but the question is not whether this is the best anyone can do but whether it is truly awful. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:26 15-Jun-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} IT needs a bit of care and attention, nothing more. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 06:19, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Unfunny article. Heavily references politician Nigel Farage despite no visible links between him and the city, and contains little in the way of humour related to the place itself. Certainly no better than the numerous deleted incarnations of the page that have preceded it. -- {{User:Rabies Turtle/sig}} 23:27, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} This poorly written article about an online gaming company has descended to ranting by unhappy customers. We do it better at, for example, [[Poptropica]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:32 8-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Hitler and nonsense numbers... not good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140909025412}}
  +
#{{Delete}} All the reasons above. [[User:TempSwampert11|TempSwampert11]] ([[User talk:TempSwampert11|talk]]) 23:41, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Too much total nonsense, too much hitler, too much boring, not enough haha. Not any, in fact, as far as I could see. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 00:53, September 17, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Adventure Quest]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Knights who say Ni}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=20:23, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDg|time=23:47, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=5
#{{Keep}} I actually thought this was alright, possibly in the territory of one of our other tags but certainly not in the dark and sticky realms of VFD. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 06:46, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not funny. Pretty true. Makes me fall asleep.--[[User:Uncycloperson|Uncycloperson]] ([[User talk:Uncycloperson|talk]]) 20:23, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} A tribute to a Monty Python skit, with no value added by Uncyclopedians. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 10-Sep-14</small>
#{{Delete}} The author of this article was trying to be funny, but is trying harder to evangelize than amuse. The humor is along the lines of, "Everybody look at how wacky we gamers are!" {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:07 11-Jun-13</small>
+
#A rehashing of the events of the skit with some bits of randomness tacked on. More effort would be needed to make this any good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140911192105}}
#{{Delete}} Might as well get rid of it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 21:26, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Sorta a bit funny but also not. --[[User:Moonhead42|Moonhead 42]] ([[User talk:Moonhead42|talk]]) 23:42, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Seems pointless to riff off someone else's joke and then come up with no new angle. At least {{u|Zarbag}}'s [[Biggus Dickus]] spins off profitably. This one doesn't. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:09, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 20:54, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Nominator got this in before Simsie slapped the {{Tl|Fix}} on the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:07 11-Jun-13</small>
 
*{{Abstain}}Hmm, I think this is another salvageable article, like [[spam]], so if it is okay, I could move it to my userspace, and work on it a bit. As much as I dislike Adventure Quest, this is a perfectly valid article topic, but the writing needs work. --{{user:DungeonSiegeAddict510/sig2}} 18:18, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:As this vote is not a slam-dunk, for now copy the code to a page in your userspace if you like. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:52 19-Jun-13</small>
 
*If you can fix it, do it, but on the main wiki it does not belong. Quite boring until fixed.--[[User:Uncycloperson|Uncycloperson]] ([[User talk:Uncycloperson|talk]]) 00:06, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Checkpoint Charlie]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|FEATURE THIS ARTICLE DAMNIT!}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=22:13, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=16:40, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=4
#{{Keep}} I sort of quite liked the concept, mainly that German is the last, and smallest, of the languages. I accept it's likely to be a target for vandals, but if there were some way of forcing people looking for Berlin to go through the page it'd be quite good. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 23:06, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} I see where the Reverend's coming from it is an intended spoof of the sign and in my mind it works. Perhaps more paragraphs could be added like the history of the sign but at the moment it stands as one of those non-encyclopedic ones that can be accepted because as they are funny. Perhaps it some of the languages the words could actually read phrases that are stereotypical of that country's way of speaking or are that country's stereotype of Americans. For example as a joke add a British English language translation and an Aussie one. The joke works for people who know what Checkpoint Charlie is and a helpful wikipedia template has been provided by author. I do not think the picture is needed but instead a photoshopped version in which the writing on the page is put onto with the picture filling up the page. I will attempt to rewrite how I think the article could look better in my user space however for the moment it is funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:00, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:I have begun working on a potential replacement (if wanted/necessary) [[User:ScottPat/Checkpoint Charlie|here]]. Any comments on my talk page or the talk page of that article or below would be appreciated. Thanks. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 10:35, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It seems that, at one time, to reach the Uncyclopedia article [[Berlin]], you had to pass through [[Checkpoint Charlie]]. This is no longer true. (There is no Checkpoint Charlie any more, nor East Berlin, nor [[East Berlin]]). All that is left is the same phrase translated into various languages including Cherokee. If there is clandestine humor, English speakers will never know. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:13 10-Jun-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} This 2007 appeal to Uncyclopedians by {{U|PoopISVERYgood}} ("Very bored, so I made this quick article.") offers the reader nothing. (VFH failed.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:40 16-Sep-14</small>
  +
#The swearing, rape, etc kill it for me. I feel like I've seen this concept done better in another article, but I can't think of it. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140916190848}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Crap by any other name. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:11, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Been here since 2007, and that's already way too long [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 21:58, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|Faggotry}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=16:51, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=5
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
+
#A fine piece of work by notoriously bad writer {{u|Mr-ex777}}, who is now not here to add his negative two cents. [[User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Faggotry]] is my attempt at a rewrite, which I've brought over from the fork; [{{fullurl:Faggotry|oldid=5464024}} this] is the last revision prior to Mr-ex's rewrite. I suggest replacing the current article with one or the other of those. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140916165121}}
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
#{{Delete|Replace.}} The article leads with the trite "nobody knows" theme and has entire sections disparaging "furfaggots" and Jews. Pre-rewrite was list-heavy and its main humor strategy was in calling various groups faggots. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:00 16-Sep-14</small>
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
#{{Delete|Annihilate}} Ugh. Does the world really need an article on this topic? [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 19:16, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
#{{Delete}} Starts off as your standard VFD-bound unfunny article, and then escalates towards intentionaly offensive insults at Jews, like a tamer Encyclopedia Dramatica (I couldn't care less about bronies, but it seems "furfaggot" is pretty much the same thing). In short, being offensive for shock value instead of humour value. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:48, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
#{{Delete}} Seems to be written in a code I care not to bother with. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:07, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*Please nominate without [[drama]], either the interwiki variety or by disparaging other Uncyclopedians. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:00 16-Sep-14</small>
  +
*:Ok. Sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140916190526}}
  +
*As this has gotten to +5 in 3 hours, I remind other Admins that it is still entitled to 24 hours' notice before deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:10 16-Sep-14</small>
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 00:53, September 17, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Johnson County, Kansas H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 878 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. Spıke ¬ 10:31 12-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Small town Kansas Kruft. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very large amount of text that is also dull. (User talk:Moonhead42) 6:13, September 3rd, 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. Rocketsled (talk) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. Spıke ¬ 15:01 24-Aug-14
  • There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs muffins) 00:41 30 Aug 2014

edit Mudripper H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 469 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. Spıke ¬ 10:56 29-Aug-14
  2. Does not jump the bar. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 01:59 30 Aug 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Looks like disguised group vanity. I searched this term and it points back here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:39, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:51, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Slackware H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 432 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. Spıke ¬ 23:55 30-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote He invented what we call today, "water" -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 17:31 31 Aug 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • And on 17 July 2007 an IP made a single edit, which was to spam an ad for Slackware into the article in a new section titled 'usage'. It sticks out like a sore thumb if you read that far. Apparently nobody noticed (maybe nobody's ever read that far in the article), since the section is still there, still just as serious and non-funny as it was the day it was plopped into the article. Snarglefoop (talk) 19:32, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
    I just read it, it isn't clear to me it's an ad, nor that it's unfunny, nor why it is funny if it is meant to be funny. A fifth Delete vote and no one has to answer this question. But you are free to try to improve an article while it is being voted on. Spıke ¬ 19:51 16-Sep-14
    Eh hmmm.... I just re-read it, and I think I was wrong -- that section is 'way too over the top to be a serious ad for Slackware. Microsoft uses it internally, and the Debian project uses it for their servers -- yeah right. And out here in the real world, the shuttle uses used IBM software, and IBM has its own version of Unix. So, I guess the author of that section took me in, at least. (And I'm still undecided on whether the article is salvageable which is why I voted neither yay nor nay.) Snarglefoop (talk) 20:03, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

edit Stanley Random Chess H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 370 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Stanley Random Article. The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. Spıke ¬ 14:38 2-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Confusing though somehow funny? Even so not funny enough to warrant the absurdity. User talk:Moonhead42 6:26, 3rd september.
  4. Starts off badly and turns into an apparently serious article. The fact that it is a hoax does not suffice to make it acceptable. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs muffins) 22:51 6 Sep 2014
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is ripped off from an article at ChessVariants.org, much of it copied word for word. That, and it's not especially funny. (I suppose it was originally inspired by Fischer Random Chess, which is a real game.) Snarglefoop (talk) 22:20, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hélio Castroneves H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 343 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote I am crying because i have won a lot off money, and the government, is going to steal all of it! i got to make a run for it! It is that dumb throughout. Spıke ¬ 17:19 3-Sep-14
  2. Hey, what happened to the sprites? They're AWOL again. (Oh yeah, and the article is bad.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cake) 02:50 7 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:18, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Who? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ugh. Bad. Cross between total incoherence and an attack article. (BTW the Wikipedia article on him has some entertaining bits, including, "an Internal Revenue Service agent testified that Castroneves owed U.S. taxes on the full $5 million from Penske even though he had never actually received the money". Man that's the IRS alright.) Snarglefoop (talk) 20:38, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Brick H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 298 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is lists from start to end because it has no comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 14:23 5-Sep-14
  2. I fixed the formatting a bit, but it didn't improve the article any. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs rabbits) 13:42 7 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is just a list and it is not funny. TempSwampert11 (talk) 23:38, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random mass of pointless falsehoods Snarglefoop (talk) 21:01, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Nexon H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 229 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This poorly written article about an online gaming company has descended to ranting by unhappy customers. We do it better at, for example, Poptropica. Spıke ¬ 11:32 8-Sep-14
  2. Hitler and nonsense numbers... not good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 02:54 9 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the reasons above. TempSwampert11 (talk) 23:41, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Too much total nonsense, too much hitler, too much boring, not enough haha. Not any, in fact, as far as I could see. Snarglefoop (talk) 00:53, September 17, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Knights who say Ni H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 168 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A tribute to a Monty Python skit, with no value added by Uncyclopedians. Spıke ¬ 23:47 10-Sep-14
  2. A rehashing of the events of the skit with some bits of randomness tacked on. More effort would be needed to make this any good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs muffins) 19:21 11 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sorta a bit funny but also not. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:42, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seems pointless to riff off someone else's joke and then come up with no new angle. At least Zarbag's Biggus Dickus spins off profitably. This one doesn't. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:09, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 20:54, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit FEATURE THIS ARTICLE DAMNIT! H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 32 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 appeal to Uncyclopedians by PoopISVERYgood ("Very bored, so I made this quick article.") offers the reader nothing. (VFH failed.) Spıke ¬ 16:40 16-Sep-14
  2. The swearing, rape, etc kill it for me. I feel like I've seen this concept done better in another article, but I can't think of it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs muffins) 19:08 16 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Crap by any other name. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:11, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Been here since 2007, and that's already way too long Snarglefoop (talk) 21:58, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Faggotry H T D

Score: 5
Elapsed Time: 31 hours
Delete (5)
  1. A fine piece of work by notoriously bad writer Mr-ex777, who is now not here to add his negative two cents. User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Faggotry is my attempt at a rewrite, which I've brought over from the fork; this is the last revision prior to Mr-ex's rewrite. I suggest replacing the current article with one or the other of those. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cake) 16:51 16 Sep 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Replace. The article leads with the trite "nobody knows" theme and has entire sections disparaging "furfaggots" and Jews. Pre-rewrite was list-heavy and its main humor strategy was in calling various groups faggots. Spıke ¬ 17:00 16-Sep-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Annihilate Ugh. Does the world really need an article on this topic? Snarglefoop (talk) 19:16, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off as your standard VFD-bound unfunny article, and then escalates towards intentionaly offensive insults at Jews, like a tamer Encyclopedia Dramatica (I couldn't care less about bronies, but it seems "furfaggot" is pretty much the same thing). In short, being offensive for shock value instead of humour value. ConCass2 (talk) 19:48, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seems to be written in a code I care not to bother with. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:07, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Please nominate without drama, either the interwiki variety or by disparaging other Uncyclopedians. Spıke ¬ 17:00 16-Sep-14
    Ok. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cats) 19:05 16 Sep 2014
  • As this has gotten to +5 in 3 hours, I remind other Admins that it is still entitled to 24 hours' notice before deletion. Spıke ¬ 20:10 16-Sep-14
Personal tools
projects