Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(HowTo:Become famous on deviantART: to archive)
({{VFDn|Who Do You Think}})
 
(6,901 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Never-Ending Story}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDg|time=08:19, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Image-free randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never compose while on drugs. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:42 10-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Felt like it would never end. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=20:55, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
== {{VFDc|Pen Island}} ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=14:11, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>20:55 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The only salvageable parts were the intro and what it is made of, but that's not enough to justify keeping the whole thing. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:20, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
#<s>{{Delete}} Pen Island (Penis land) should be a fun article full of ''double entendres'' that feint toward but never touch the organ. What we have is increasingly dumb digressions by kids who are giddy about writing penis jokes to strangers. When you get to the end you realize that none of it is an original comedy creation but yet another Uncyclopedia article that derives all its humor from a pre-existing meme with its own (several) websites. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:11 27-Mar-13</small></s> '''Withdrawn.''' {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:35 28-Mar-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*The illustrations here should be kept, but very little of the text has merit. Various IP's have made poor additions to this article that should be reverted. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 14:44, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:I've reverted the article and done a heavy copy-edit. The initial photo, according to the summary by {{U|TheLedBalloon}}, seems to have been lifted from one of those other websites; the aerial photo is used at [[Penis]] and many other places; the mushrooms are also used in a page in Puppy's userspace; the chimpanzee photo was a casualty, as it never related to this article, as most of the former text didn't either. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:37 27-Mar-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War II:This Time it's Personal]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:41, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=22:08, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} apparently, we have 3 versions of this article for some reason. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:41, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Okay, so the joke is, since World War II was a "duplicate war" (of World War I) (only it wasn't except in the eyes of a grade-schooler who has two more years before taking a course on World History) (or was it a duplicate Stephen Spielberg movie?) create an Uncyclopedia article "in the style of the thing it's about" by creating an arbitrary number of copies. One copy for everything the reader might search for, and then some; a brilliant alternative to the Redirect. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:19 25-Mar-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} 2010 author {{U|Weri long wang}} writes the opposite of the plot of ''Atlas Shrugged,'' then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:08 21-Jun-15</small>
#War leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Someone else's intestines! [[user:Aleister|''Let God Sort Them Out'']] 23:30 25-3-'13
+
#{{Delete}} Not funny. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Title good but following article crap. I will take a bold punt and suggest the writer has never read any Marx. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:38, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
}}
 
 
== [[The Second World War II]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:37, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} a new clone of a the article below, this one seems a bit worse. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:37, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} "Uncyclopedia is a place for original comedy creations." This article even has a template ({{Tl|Merge}}), for Chrissakes, to advise the reader that it isn't one. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:22 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#War is unhealthy for children and other cannon fodder. [[user:Aleister|''General Deletion'']] 23:27 25-3-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Shall we leave the best one of these in mainspace and move it to [[World War II (movie)]]? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:22 25-Mar-13</small>
 
*{{For}} This. You pick, but I think you already did with your voting pattern. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] the same as my time above
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[The Second World War]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Who Do You Think}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:35, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#No redeeming value as far as I can tell {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:20 28-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Baffling gibberish. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Only after reading the talk page, did I kind of get the author's concept. The reader should not have to do that, especially if the piece is still no more amusing or comprehensible. Obscure nonsense. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:19, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Relies on the sheer weirdness of how it is written, but has nothing else going for it. I get the impression that the author is [[Bat Fuck Insane|insane]], and/or trying to write some strange song lyrics (the repetitive table at the end could be the chorus...what do you think?). {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 07:04, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} more warcruft. This one is about WWII as a movie, and reads like it was written by a 10 year old. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:35, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{delete}} I'm sure we've already voted to delete one of these clones. NRV. (And the same delete vote on the above.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:27 26 Mar 2013}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War VI]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:26, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=03:35, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>03:35 30-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Sexist and unfunny. Finishes off with a crappy list. No redeeming qualities. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:24, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never funny in a million years. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:31, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Awful. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:23, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} another wacky war article. This is prone to using capslock for no apparent reason. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:26, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Notable as amateur fiction but certainly not as humor. The World Wars template reflects the fact that, at some point in our past, writing a new article about World War whatever was a cinch for permanence by meme (imitation). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:11 25-Mar-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*The others you list (as of now) are blah wars, not even worth fighting. This article seems like it had some thought into it, has lots of words and detail, its own maps apparently which follow the fighting, and might have redeeming value. I haven't read much of it, so maybe it's all jibberish under a candy covering, so for now I'll restrict this to a comment. The other ones, if you want to count my vote as a delete, please do so. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 17:56 25-3-'13
 
*:For the record, when counting, I am not going to hallucinate Aleister Delete votes onto a ballot based on discussion that occurs on some other ballot. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:11 25-Mar-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War What]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get a boner}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:18, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=02:56, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} No humor except the glee of writing to strangers about sex. It is a chore maintaining the 2012 page of {{U|SecondChanceForMe}} against continual vandalism. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:56 5-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} I'm sure there is a funny and clever article that could written with this subject header, but this isn't it.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:31, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} An article with a promising title/concept, but poorly executed. Deserves a complete rewrite. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 06:56, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} a typical wacky war. I think this might be trying to half-parody the wacky war meme, but we don't need to parody ourselves. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:18, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The only authentic humor here, the question-mark-shaped [[Amnesia Islands]], have their own Uncyclopedia article. The only other humor here, stupid reasons to start a war, are moot as the war in question was never really started. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:15 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#War, what is it good for? [[user:Aleister|''General Deletion'']] 23:27 25-3-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[HowTo:Be a liberal]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dissociative Identity Disorder}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:43, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete|Advocacy.}} Conservatives wrote this sprawling catalog of liberal fallacies, liberal failures, and liberal gaffes, replete with external links and in-line YouTube videos, and liberals vandalized it so much that the entire first screenful is now warnings to liberals and the reader. (I found it when cleaning up after our deletion of [[:Template:Number of Maimings]].) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:43 25-Mar-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} (Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder, just so you all know.) To get the joke you have to visit the revision history, to see that the article was written largely by a single user who with every revision wrote about a different thing with a different style, sometimes reverting himself (and calling his own contributions vandalism). The idea wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that the reader has no clue what this is about, unless he randomly checks the page's history or talkpage. Also, none of the revisions are very well written, I find. Finally, (albeit it's of a minor concern compared to the rest), the disorder isn't portrayed particularly well. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:27, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} WTF? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:33, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} As above, but more importantly it just lacks any funny. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:35 26 Mar 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} I don't even see the invisible hand that Nominator does, but that author {{U|So So}} used this as a sandbox. His various projects and a few of Anon's could be thought of as a collective Dissociative Identity, but I agree that this isn't obvious to most readers. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:45 6-Jul-15</small>
#{{Delete}} Unfunny long-winded rant. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 14:53, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Another nonsense article (that is not even an article), that nobody will bother trying to figure out. It would have at least made more sense if each personality change was on one page, so the reader can see the dysfunction. The various personalities are barely described either, just cheesy lines left for the reader to try to figure out. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:46, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
 
* Point of note: Liberal (capitalised) in Australia is seen as referring to the Liberal/National Party coalition. Which in a 2PP sense is the conservative party. From an Australian perspective this article makes no sense. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:35 26 Mar 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
== [[Jesse Jackson]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=11:30, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete|Me is black, so honky stay back.}} This article has become a repository for racist jokes having nothing to do with Jesse Jackson (including Ebonics the way no one speaks it), other jokes having nothing to do with anything ("Abortion bill? Pay it!" is a decades-old Pope joke), and even anti-Semitism having nothing to do with Jackson's anti-Semitism. Start over. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:30 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} I would call this one randumbo rather than racist. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:18, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Couldn't even read more than a few sentences, and with a glance over the page it didn't get better. Michael Jackson's dad deserves better. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 13:22 25-3-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The page is protected, so I couldn't add {VFD}. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 07:04, July 7, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Never-Ending Story H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 646 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Image-free randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never compose while on drugs. Spıke Ѧ 11:42 10-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Felt like it would never end. --EStop (talk) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 370 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. The only salvageable parts were the intro and what it is made of, but that's not enough to justify keeping the whole thing. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:20, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 368 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Title good but following article crap. I will take a bold punt and suggest the writer has never read any Marx. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:38, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Who Do You Think H T D

Score: 5
Elapsed Time: 208 hours
Delete (5)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Only after reading the talk page, did I kind of get the author's concept. The reader should not have to do that, especially if the piece is still no more amusing or comprehensible. Obscure nonsense. --EStop (talk) 09:19, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Relies on the sheer weirdness of how it is written, but has nothing else going for it. I get the impression that the author is insane, and/or trying to write some strange song lyrics (the repetitive table at the end could be the chorus...what do you think?). Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 07:04, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 171 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sexist and unfunny. Finishes off with a crappy list. No redeeming qualities. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:24, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never funny in a million years. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:31, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Awful. --EStop (talk) 09:23, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Get a boner H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 52 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No humor except the glee of writing to strangers about sex. It is a chore maintaining the 2012 page of SecondChanceForMe against continual vandalism. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:56 5-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm sure there is a funny and clever article that could written with this subject header, but this isn't it.--EStop (talk) 09:31, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. An article with a promising title/concept, but poorly executed. Deserves a complete rewrite. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 06:56, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Dissociative Identity Disorder H T D Survivor

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 36 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. (Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder, just so you all know.) To get the joke you have to visit the revision history, to see that the article was written largely by a single user who with every revision wrote about a different thing with a different style, sometimes reverting himself (and calling his own contributions vandalism). The idea wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that the reader has no clue what this is about, unless he randomly checks the page's history or talkpage. Also, none of the revisions are very well written, I find. Finally, (albeit it's of a minor concern compared to the rest), the disorder isn't portrayed particularly well. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. WTF? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:33, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't even see the invisible hand that Nominator does, but that author So So used this as a sandbox. His various projects and a few of Anon's could be thought of as a collective Dissociative Identity, but I agree that this isn't obvious to most readers. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:45 6-Jul-15
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another nonsense article (that is not even an article), that nobody will bother trying to figure out. It would have at least made more sense if each personality change was on one page, so the reader can see the dysfunction. The various personalities are barely described either, just cheesy lines left for the reader to try to figure out. --EStop (talk) 09:46, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The page is protected, so I couldn't add {VFD}. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects