Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(HowTo:Become famous on deviantART: to archive)
m ({{VFDn|Bones K. McMillington}})
 
(7,031 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get Expelled from School}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=12:50, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|A load of poopy.}} Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:50 11-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete|Delete.}} Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pupil misbehavior ''can'' be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at [[Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]]. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. [[User:Simsilikesims|Simsilikesims]] ([[User talk:Simsilikesims|talk]]) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Redirect}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=1
== {{VFDc|Pen Island}} ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:11, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=0
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#<s>{{Delete}} Pen Island (Penis land) should be a fun article full of ''double entendres'' that feint toward but never touch the organ. What we have is increasingly dumb digressions by kids who are giddy about writing penis jokes to strangers. When you get to the end you realize that none of it is an original comedy creation but yet another Uncyclopedia article that derives all its humor from a pre-existing meme with its own (several) websites. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:11 27-Mar-13</small></s> '''Withdrawn.''' {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:35 28-Mar-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=2
*The illustrations here should be kept, but very little of the text has merit. Various IP's have made poor additions to this article that should be reverted. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 14:44, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:I've reverted the article and done a heavy copy-edit. The initial photo, according to the summary by {{U|TheLedBalloon}}, seems to have been lifted from one of those other websites; the aerial photo is used at [[Penis]] and many other places; the mushrooms are also used in a page in Puppy's userspace; the chimpanzee photo was a casualty, as it never related to this article, as most of the former text didn't either. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:37 27-Mar-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[World War II:This Time it's Personal]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:41, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
#{{Keep}} The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
|delete=#{{delete}} apparently, we have 3 versions of this article for some reason. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:41, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Okay, so the joke is, since World War II was a "duplicate war" (of World War I) (only it wasn't except in the eyes of a grade-schooler who has two more years before taking a course on World History) (or was it a duplicate Stephen Spielberg movie?) create an Uncyclopedia article "in the style of the thing it's about" by creating an arbitrary number of copies. One copy for everything the reader might search for, and then some; a brilliant alternative to the Redirect. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:19 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#War leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Someone else's intestines! [[user:Aleister|''Let God Sort Them Out'']] 23:30 25-3-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit ''à la'' "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
  +
*Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  +
*EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::Okay, great! I'll just finish my [[Sex change]] and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
:::Thanks a lot! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[The Second World War II]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:37, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A nice idea, but unfinished. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
#{{Keep}} The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:29 14-Jul-15</small>
|delete=#{{delete}} a new clone of a the article below, this one seems a bit worse. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:37, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} "Uncyclopedia is a place for original comedy creations." This article even has a template ({{Tl|Merge}}), for Chrissakes, to advise the reader that it isn't one. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:22 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#War is unhealthy for children and other cannon fodder. [[user:Aleister|''General Deletion'']] 23:27 25-3-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Shall we leave the best one of these in mainspace and move it to [[World War II (movie)]]? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:22 25-Mar-13</small>
 
*{{For}} This. You pick, but I think you already did with your voting pattern. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] the same as my time above
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[The Second World War]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|SGML}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:35, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{delete}} more warcruft. This one is about WWII as a movie, and reads like it was written by a 10 year old. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:35, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{delete}} I'm sure we've already voted to delete one of these clones. NRV. (And the same delete vote on the above.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:27 26 Mar 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} [[WP:SuicideGirls|SuicideGirls]] seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Keep}} Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*'''Renamed.''' Used to be [[Suicide Girl Markup Language]], but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War VI]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:26, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} another wacky war article. This is prone to using capslock for no apparent reason. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:26, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Notable as amateur fiction but certainly not as humor. The World Wars template reflects the fact that, at some point in our past, writing a new article about World War whatever was a cinch for permanence by meme (imitation). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:11 25-Mar-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*The others you list (as of now) are blah wars, not even worth fighting. This article seems like it had some thought into it, has lots of words and detail, its own maps apparently which follow the fighting, and might have redeeming value. I haven't read much of it, so maybe it's all jibberish under a candy covering, so for now I'll restrict this to a comment. The other ones, if you want to count my vote as a delete, please do so. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 17:56 25-3-'13
+
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
*:For the record, when counting, I am not going to hallucinate Aleister Delete votes onto a ballot based on discussion that occurs on some other ballot. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:11 25-Mar-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War What]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:18, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=17:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:30 28-Jul-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
#{{Keep}} With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} a typical wacky war. I think this might be trying to half-parody the wacky war meme, but we don't need to parody ourselves. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:18, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} The only authentic humor here, the question-mark-shaped [[Amnesia Islands]], have their own Uncyclopedia article. The only other humor here, stupid reasons to start a war, are moot as the war in question was never really started. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:15 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#War, what is it good for? [[user:Aleister|''General Deletion'']] 23:27 25-3-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[HowTo:Be a liberal]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Octavarium}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:43, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=11:54, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Mostly a fanboy review of a single, obscure prog-rock album, written in code that can only be decoded by insiders and roadies. Several generations of Admins have tried to get rid of it using tags. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>11:54 1-Aug-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Who? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:54, August 4, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete|Advocacy.}} Conservatives wrote this sprawling catalog of liberal fallacies, liberal failures, and liberal gaffes, replete with external links and in-line YouTube videos, and liberals vandalized it so much that the entire first screenful is now warnings to liberals and the reader. (I found it when cleaning up after our deletion of [[:Template:Number of Maimings]].) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:43 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:27, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} As above, but more importantly it just lacks any funny. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:35 26 Mar 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} Unfunny long-winded rant. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 14:53, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* Point of note: Liberal (capitalised) in Australia is seen as referring to the Liberal/National Party coalition. Which in a 2PP sense is the conservative party. From an Australian perspective this article makes no sense. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:35 26 Mar 2013}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Jesse Jackson]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Bones K. McMillington}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:30, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=12:21, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Found on [[Special:LonelyPages]]. Whimsical essay is not encyclopedic and not very funny. The word "McMillington" does not occur anywhere in Wikipedia, and Google bounces right back here. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:21 1-Aug-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
|comments=The article appears to be wound round an image I found for illustrating the [[Liberal Party of Great Britain]]. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:13, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
|delete=
 
#{{Delete|Me is black, so honky stay back.}} This article has become a repository for racist jokes having nothing to do with Jesse Jackson (including Ebonics the way no one speaks it), other jokes having nothing to do with anything ("Abortion bill? Pay it!" is a decades-old Pope joke), and even anti-Semitism having nothing to do with Jackson's anti-Semitism. Start over. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:30 25-Mar-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} I would call this one randumbo rather than racist. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:18, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Couldn't even read more than a few sentences, and with a glance over the page it didn't get better. Michael Jackson's dad deserves better. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 13:22 25-3-'13
 
|comments=
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|King Harkinian}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=21:18, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=1
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=#{{Delete}} The thing about characters like these is that they're one-note. The King's gimmick is that he says things like "dinner" or "mah boi" in a hammy way, nothing really more to it. I think the short descriptions on the "Characters" sections in ''[[Link: The Faces of Evil]]'' and ''[[Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon]]'' is good enough on its own.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:18, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
|keepnumber=1
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
|keep=
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
#{{Keep}} I disagree with [[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]]'s assessment of King Harkinian's character. While it is true that in games he is restricted to a minor role in some forgettable CD-i games, he has gone on to become famous in the YouTube Poop community, where he has far more significance. People will see him in many classic video remixes and want to look him up. (On that note, the article should perhaps be edited to more accurately reflect that.) {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:51, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 12:13, August 5, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit HowTo:Get Expelled from School H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 599 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote A load of poopy. Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:50 11-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--EStop (talk) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pupil misbehavior can be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. Simsilikesims (talk) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

edit Redirect H T D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 521 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit à la "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  • Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  • EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, great! I'll just finish my Sex change and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--EStop (talk) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

edit The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 521 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A nice idea, but unfinished. --EStop (talk) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:29 14-Jul-15
Comments

edit SGML H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 385 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. SuicideGirls seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--EStop (talk) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Renamed. Used to be Suicide Girl Markup Language, but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 254 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15

edit Exploding Testicles H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 186 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:30 28-Jul-15
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit Octavarium H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 96 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Mostly a fanboy review of a single, obscure prog-rock album, written in code that can only be decoded by insiders and roadies. Several generations of Admins have tried to get rid of it using tags. Spıke Radiomicrophone11:54 1-Aug-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Who? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:54, August 4, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Bones K. McMillington H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 95 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Found on Special:LonelyPages. Whimsical essay is not encyclopedic and not very funny. The word "McMillington" does not occur anywhere in Wikipedia, and Google bounces right back here. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:21 1-Aug-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

The article appears to be wound round an image I found for illustrating the Liberal Party of Great Britain. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:13, August 5, 2015 (UTC)

edit King Harkinian H T D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 86 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The thing about characters like these is that they're one-note. The King's gimmick is that he says things like "dinner" or "mah boi" in a hammy way, nothing really more to it. I think the short descriptions on the "Characters" sections in Link: The Faces of Evil and Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon is good enough on its own.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:18, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I disagree with EpicWinner's assessment of King Harkinian's character. While it is true that in games he is restricted to a minor role in some forgettable CD-i games, he has gone on to become famous in the YouTube Poop community, where he has far more significance. People will see him in many classic video remixes and want to look him up. (On that note, the article should perhaps be edited to more accurately reflect that.) Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:51, August 1, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects