Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Inland Northwest: Reverted to best version in history)
({{VFDn|Adolf Hilter}}: Deleted)
 
(4,271 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Wasp}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=2
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} ''"War with the Hornet(1500-2009) (The only section worth reading in this shitty article)"'' sums it up nicely. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Photo-less article's theme is dog turds, then the article itself, bickering with itself. I presume that, in 2007, the Rabbi was still amused at being an author and not so experienced as to do it right. Includes memes (Dubya? WMD?) and nonsense numbers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 7-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#Rabbi Techno's original seems fine, and held my interest enough to actually read the whole thing. Could use work and pictures though. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 20:23 7-4-14
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
 
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
 
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
== {{VFDn|Welsh Congo}} ==
   
== [[Inland Northwest]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=12:03, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic and random. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*A Welsh version of the Belgian (''et al.'') Congo could be fun if written by someone who knew something about Wales (other than its native translation) and about Africa. I've cleared up the worst here but it still lacks a reason to exist. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:11 7-Apr-14</small>
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Alexander Graham Bell}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Written, and revised overnight with 2010 census numbers, overtly to boost the city of Boise, just irreverently enough to fit on a humor wiki. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:03 27-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Random. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
#{{delete}} largely imaginary region (per wikipedia, the actual inland northwest refers to eastern Washington and northern Idaho). The author is overly excited about the fact that Boise is the 101st largest city in the United States. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:41, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Do something with it, other than this randomness loosely bound to "Georg Dobbeyer Büch" (sadly, only a piped link to the usual Bush article). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:14 7-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#The original isn't horribly bad. Or it can be deleted and redirected to [[Homophone]], the article that almost turned me gay. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 20:25 7-4-14
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* I was considering a revert of the last editor, but the previous revision was no better. I don't know the area at all though, so have no idea what is relevant and what is just garbage. Is there any earlier revision which is better than the current? Is there a way to salvage anything worthwhile from it? {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:58 28 Feb 2013}}
 
*:I did exactly that yesterday, and concluded exactly that. Saw in the history that {{U|JesusLandMan}} in 2007 set out to "make it at least a little funny"; rev of 26-Aug-07, minus "Why Boise Sucks" is short but has a concept. <small>14:14</small> PS--I have indeed assembled a version based on that one; sorry I did not do this before nominating. I'll let my nomination stand; what do you think now, Mnbvcxz? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:45 28-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[101 Things You Should Not Do]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Fart filter}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:57, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDg|time=19:51, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:51, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} If Tom Cruise were actually notorious for farting, then the article would have a comedy strategy. As is, it is just author's joy of writing fart jokes to strangers. The Fast Fart Transform could be the seed of a theme, but author doesn't take it anywhere — except "into the rectum." See above. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 7-Apr-14</small>
  +
#blurp [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:19 8-4-14
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:07, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 05:04, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
# {{Delete}} List {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|05:57 25 Feb 2013}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment|Abstain.}} A playground for I.P. Anon and other drive-by writers of one-liners isn't optimal, but it's self-contained. The template, though, is awful: "This page is under perpetual construction... It is an ever changing work...." That is in fact a better description of [[Uncyclopedia:Sandbox]]. Better to get them to finish it, to flesh out each of the 100 themes into funny paragraphs, as I now try to do on its talk page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:11 25-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Arthur C. Clarke]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|That time I was nearly raped by the power rangers during my sojourn to the 90's}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:30, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDg|time=18:16, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} I couldn't find this funny. Also, sorry for putting the twentieth nomination here. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:16, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#blurp [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 19:19 8-4-14
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>09:51 9-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Target down. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 12:59, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 05:08, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Good enough now. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:21 24-Feb-13</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This article is based on the assertion that Arthur C. Clarke claimed to invent everything, insults directed to other dead sci-fi authors, and poorly implemented jabs at his allegations pedophilia. There is a bit of concept here, but very little execution, and not much more potential. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 12:30, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I see Aleister at work here and am holding off. The original article hit the same buttons ''ad nauseam'' but did start with a perfectly fine concept. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:38 24-Feb-13</small>
 
*:Never saw this page before, checked the history (remember the rule about looking for a better version in the history????) and found out it's a Mhaille page, and reverted to his last edit. So by being a Mhaille page I surmise it contains very good material, but don't have time to read it now. Am going other places now, and one of them has food. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:46 24-2-'13
 
*::Point to Aleister; nominator has the duty to make a token effort to find some quality somewhere, even during a purge of a namespace. I brought categories up to date after Aleister's mega-revert. Only the section on "tingle" seems to have no basis in reality, but maybe some of you recall something about Clarke that I don't. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:56 24-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::The content is basically the same. Although it was created by an established user, it was also created in 2006. There is ''some'' content, but it could be collapsed to half a dozen quotes without losing any information. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:12, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::To answer my own question, [[WP:Arthur C. Clarke]] does not contain the word "tingle" so I'll kill three of the quotes for you. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:16 24-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Anonymous]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Unquotable:Random unfunny quotes}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:12, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDg|time=17:09, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} I was sorting out [[Unquotable]] when I came across this article. I don't think we should catalogue all the crap quotes too. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 17:09, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Every stupid thing Anon has typed into an article is not worth warehousing, less still assembling into monument by way of ranting about their stupidity. "Random unfunny quotes" are unfunny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:15 12-Apr-14</small>
  +
#randomly banning and deleting [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 12:28 13-4-14
  +
#{{Delete|Ah, terrible}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:43, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Even the better ones are bad. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 05:17, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}}. This is a very specific vote for a very specific article. Wooga for life! -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This page is, by its title, the epitome of scatter-shot. I would quote trim it, but this page has no theme. Is it trying to quote the internet cyber-terrorist group, or what? If so, the subject is too obscure. It is trying to compile every anonymous quote in the history of humanity? If so, the subject is too broad. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 12:12, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Starting with a nonsense year number in a preachy Intro before devolving into themelessness, this is another tribute to the namespace instead of a service to the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 24-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} This page fails on various levels, but mostly on a poor (or non-existent) concept. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:33 25 Feb 2013}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*[[Wikiquote:Anonymous]] is a real page, as is [[Wikiquote:Anonymous (group)]]. Theoretically there could be a valid page that is a parody of this, and this Unquotable page would be the ideal location. Sadly, the page at this location fails. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:33 25 Feb 2013}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:About]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Alternate universe}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:55, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
#{{Keep}} If we are going to have an Unquotable namespace--and, for the moment, we are--then why not have a page setting out a coherent plan for it? UnNews has several such, and they used to be helpful. Indeed policy should not be "spread across 5 or 6 pages" and if you can find a better spot at which to unify it, tell me where it went and I'll flip my vote. You might find this page a useful place to set down guidelines so that the cruft you have spent so much time editing doesn't creep back. Or we might flesh this out into deadpan praise of people's use of dead men's quotations to fluff up their unremarkable present-day rhetoric. We have found gassy text elsewhere and not deleted an entire page that otherwise has a purpose. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:43 23-Feb-13</small>
+
|delete=
|delnumber=1
+
#{{Delete}} A main page that tries to be exactly the opposite of our main page. It's not very funny or even consistent in what it does ("Vote for featured image" instead of "Vote for the image with the worst quality", for example). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} unhelpful "about" page. The policy pages for unquotable are spread across 5 or 6 pages for no apparent reason, besides making the project look bigger than it actually is. What is said here could be said in one sentence. This has been unedited since 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:55, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Lame attempts at humor through rote translation of our main pages should use Babel instead. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 14-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=#{{Keep}} I like it. Simple and effective. For someone like me before I joined Uncyc this kind of page just made me laugh because it just ridicules the idea of an encyclopedia such as wikipedia. Only on Uncyclopedia can you get this. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 15:52, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Made me laugh, cry, salivate, and then hiccup. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 18:50 20-4-14
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Lightning}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It's a good example of Obfuscata, and probably should remain purely as that. Given it is Obfuscata, I don't see a huge argument for a rewrite of this to match a rewrite of the page it's a translation of. If the main page is rewritten to an extent that this is no longer relevant, then we can look at a rewrite of this at that stage. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:19 24 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{Keep}} Per above. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 02:35, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}}. Because, because, because, because, because. I'm serious about that last one. The first four are me being silly. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{delete}} Reskin of the unquotable mainpage. And by "reskin" I mean text change. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete|Delete, again.}} This is seriously bad use of the English language. Yes, it is meant to make fun of same, but simply taking another Uncyclopedia page and making the English turgid is not heavy lifting nor as laughter-causing as focused, planned, engaging use of (perhaps with wry commentary on) bad English. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:52 23-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Memish and lacks humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=*{{comment}} I plan on a doing a reworking on the quotable mainpage. However, the main link template is intertwined with the various reskin pages. Before I work on the quote mainpage, I need to see what the community wants to keep, so I am not wasting time reworking articles that are going to be deleted anyway. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|"Has been scientifically proven."}} Gassy phrases like this, and gassy [[UNQUOTE|initial quotations]], will drive away the reader even before the Intro ends and the reader finds nothing left but dumb lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:29 21-Apr-14</small>
*:You have noted that the same text is transliterated multiple times into different "languages," but you could improve the Unquotable main page without the risk that we might compel you to apply your changes to Obfuscata in bad English, pirate-speak, etc. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:52 23-Feb-13</small>
+
|keepnumber=0
*::The coding of [[Unquotable:MainArticleList]] (which is used as template) is horrible, generating different content on different pages because there is a different section of code for each page the template appears on. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 20:17, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keep=
*:Horrible indeed! The template ("tricked out" in the ever-self-congratulatory words of {{U|Some user}}) special-cases itself based on who its caller is, to give each caller the "elegance" of calling the same, single template to achieve radically different effects! This is not so much a key part of our site heritage as a bomb planted especially deep! {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:42 23-Feb-13</small>
+
|comments=
*{{comment|@ puppy}} if we need an article on Obfuscata, which would be a valid subject, it should be at [[Obfuscata]], not as a clone of a random navigation page. This article makes about as much sense as running [[Newtis Newtfield]] through a [[Swedish Chef]] translator and calling it the [[this page does not exist|Svedeesh Noot]]. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:16, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
::I agree that we should have an article at [[Obfuscata]] but the closest we have is at [[Obfuscation]]. I think this quotable page is a good example of Obfuscata, and we don't have an article at Obfuscata about the style of writing, so this should stay, at least until someone writes the Obfuscata page. You may consider this a challenge to write said page, if you like. Also, if someone ran Newtis Newtfield through a Swedish chef translator and called it the Sveedeesh Noot that would be funny. Redundant, but funny, particularly if it were linked as a see also from the main Newtis Newtfield article.{{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 02:40, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Unquotable:History of Unquotable]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Adjective}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=22:20, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
#{{Keep}} I fight for {{U|Some user}}. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 01:40, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:That is the corniest Tron reference I have seen in a long time. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:23 23 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{Keep}} Imrealized knows his history. This page, which I've never seen before, give the background of the Oscar quotes, something which uncyclopedia is infamous for. It outlines the start of the meme, and how it evolved. I don't understand why people want to delete the main pages of the Oscar Wilde quotes. The quotes themselves, when they are bad and are on good to stupid articles, sure, but not the historical pages themselves. What's the problem with leaving those few pages alone, especially one like this which educates about the beginning of a tradition. I stand with Imrealized in standing with Some user, who is sitting down and won't stand for himself. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 8:03 23-2-'13
 
#{{Keep}} I didn't want to be the only holdout, so I proposed originally to userspace this piece of Uncyc history so that it wouldn't get deleted outright. But I think that since it does mention former Uncyc admins in the story, it does deserve a place in Unquotable as Uncyc history. The UN:CM test also takes into account whether any of the admins might have heard of it, and I do remember one or two of the admins mentioned here, though they are no longer active on this site. Admittedly this story all happened before I chanced upon Uncyclopedia, but that is history for you. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 02:58, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:How would you feel about it being moved to Uncyclopedia namespace? {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 25 Feb 2013}}
 
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Poorly written navelism. And as someone who actually digs into the history of this site and it's various facets, even I found this a most uninteresting chapter, as it's almost pure [[UN:CM]] stuff. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:20 21 Feb 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} First person. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Namespace creator {{U|Some user}} sets down in print his personal story as persecuted artist. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:27 21-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete|"You are a FUCKING asshole."}} Stand-up comedy by an unfunny person. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:27 21-Apr-14</small>
#{{delete}} nobody cares. This is somewhere between vanity and cracking wise with the navigation tools, with a dose of advocacy. This uses a whole article of ranting to explain history that could be said in a paragraph. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:42, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
#:History explained in one paragraph - today's educational system described. The best history is an eyewitness account of what occurred told by someone who was there, plus the thought process which went into the situations described. It would be nice to have as detailed an account of the creation of uncy and other aspects of the wiki as we have here about the step-by-step creation and thought processes concerning the start of the Oscar Wilde quotes. [[user:Aleister|''a random historian'']] 8:25 23-2-'13
+
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*This did not seem to me to focus quite exclusively on one user, but since that user is the main focus of the article, I propose we userspace this article to Some User's userspace. {{Unsigned|Simsilikesims}}
 
*:Concur {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:12 22-Feb-13</small>
 
*::Deleted or in name space - either means it's not in general distribution. I'm happy with that. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:09 22 Feb 2013}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Jesus Christ]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Admiral Ozzel}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:12, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2.5
+
{{VFDt|time=07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Some good concepts however poorly written and mainly quotes. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The surfeit of quotes is easily fixable with a switchblade. The lack of humor, regarding a minor character in the ''Star Wars'' series, is not. Parents are "Incompetent Peep and Incompetent Person," and that is as close to funny as it gets. Confusion with ''Star Trek'' could be a theme but author takes it nowhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:30 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep|Selfish half-keep}}. I've hacked, trimmed, added, hacked and polished again. Without completely changing the concept, this is significantly improved. It could be more designed as twisting scripture, but that doesn't fit with the “illiterate/didn't write it” concept, which I feel has merit, and could possibly become it's own article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|04:34 23 Feb 2013}}
 
#:"Twisting scripture" would imply that the invented quotations were actually based on something. This is the prerequisite for decent humor rather than rant--attributed to Jesus, as I say below at Hitler, not based on anything but desire for artificial melodrama. If the concept of the lists is inattention to the basis of humor, then it is not a "concept" you need to preserve. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:12 23-Feb-13</small>
 
#::There are two ways to do a page like this that make sense. One is to try and make the quotes as near to that original as possible. The second is to take the character of the subject and create quotes that fit with a parody of the character. This is a parody of the person, rather than a parody of sayings attributed to him. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:47 23 Feb 2013}}
 
#Puppy barks. And will probably keep on barking. Nice page. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 8:08 23-2-'13
 
#{{Keep}}. This vote is also specific, but in an entirely different way than the other vote. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete|Jesi-cruft}} 60% advocacy and 40% randumbo. 100% in the wrong tone. Only a couple quotes come close to being clever, and those are in the wrong tone. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:12, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*The Intro is downright good. On the rest of the article, my comments are the same as on the Hitler one. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:16 21-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Swedish_Chef]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Norbit}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny, slightly memish and poorly written. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep}}- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
+
#{{Keep}} Read the outrageous plot at [[WP:Norbit#Plot]]. This blax-self-ploitation flick must get serviced by Uncyclopedia. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 21-Apr-14</small>
#{{Keep}}. Bork, bork, bork! -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:And now has been. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:31 22-Apr-14</small>
|delnumber=5
+
|comments=
|delete=#{{delete}} Another article that is the same concept as the mainspace article, only done worse. Granted, the mainspace article execution could use work, but quotification is hardly an improvement. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:17, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Unquotable fails utterly, and especially at imitating Wikiquotes, when the person being quoted is not a celebrity but a stock stereotype. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:30 19-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Muppet cruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:33 20 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} The quotes here just aren't funny anymore (especially the dated stuff about G.W. Bush), and translating them into Sveedish Chef speek does not zee make zem foooney Bork Bork Bork! Besides, the Muppet Show in which the Swedish Chef muppet starred in was in its prime when I was in about 6th or 7th grade. The celebrity claim to fame of this muppet is so old that it has been forgotten and is no longer widely remembered. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 03:09, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:50, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*{{comment}} we have a near identically themed page at for the [[Swedish Chef]] in mainspace. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:33, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Yoda]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Taking candy from strangers}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:13, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Random. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A thoroughly tedious read, about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:02 21-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep}}- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
 
#{{Keep}} you must. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Just read this, and some of it is pretty good. You can't have enough good Yodaisms. I'll do some work on the page later. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 22:25 26-2-'13
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} 90% of the quotes are about sex, and 9% are Russian Reversals. There might be a couple quotes here that are funny, but I can't see justifying a page on the subject. The whole joke is the Yoda voice, which is done better than the quote format could ever be at [[Yoda]]. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:13, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|"Stroke my green penis, you will."}} Not just the Russian Reversals but everything on this page is imitative. The only authentic comedy was done by the creators of Yoda. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:28 19-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Muppet cruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:34 20 Feb 2013}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDc|Unquotable:Satan}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Adolf Hilter}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=4
+
{{VFDg|time=10:02, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Of all the Monty Python sketches out there "Mr. Hilter in England" is one of the greatest however this article does not give it justice at all. It uses unoriginal comedy from the sketch and fills the rest in with memes. If re-written, needs a re-write which honours Monty Python by having Mr. Hilter on an encyclopedia but is actually funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:02, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#That's our hitler page? I've never looked at it. Gas it and then redirect to one of the better pages (we can't leave a red link where hitler used to be). [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 12:25 21=4=14
  +
#:Actually Al, this feature here is our [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler page]]. Read the title of the VFD page again and if you haven't seen the sketch I'd suggest watching it! {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 12:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} In fact, we don't need an article that simply tries in vain to out-Python Monty Python. I agree that all of the humor here is either unoriginal or not humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:03 21-Apr-14</small>
  +
#'''Delete''' --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 17:17, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:31, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep}} Not a Muppet. Beyond that this is an example of what the namespace is good for. There's half a dozen decent one liners, but not enough content to call it an article of prose. Adding much more to this would potentially be overkill. Deleting this would be removing a page that has merit. Saying “It wouldn't survive in mainspace” is correct - and that's why we have other name spaces. This is better than 99% of [[:Category:My sojourn|My sojourn]] articles. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:43 20 Feb 2013}}
+
|comments=
#{{keep}} Per above. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 06:50, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
}}
#{{keep}}- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
+
#{{Keep}}. TYUN! -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
== {{VFDn|Evil Illuminati Adolf Hitler Clone Society}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{delete}} this feels like the retarded step-brother of the [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/good-guy-lucifer/ Good Guy Lucifer meme]. This is a mixture of scattershot, advocacy, and general quotecruft. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} If anyone wants to write an article in the voice of Satan, I consider that a legitimate comedy strategy. This article is that strategy reduced to exactly listcruft. If any newbie wrote this in mainspace, any experienced editor would tell him that we are looking for funny paragraphs and not quips, slaps, and one-liners. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:25 19-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Poorly written, awful and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=*{{comment|At pup}} the problem with this is that there may be 6 good one-liners, but there are 20 quotes on the page. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:16, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} 2006-cruft; a Wacky Organization full of memes and devoid of humor. Repeated references to "Noam Particular" are and always have been red-links, with or without the middle name. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:28 22-Apr-14</small>
----
+
|keepnumber=0
*'''Vote closed.''' No consensus to delete. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:03 26-Feb-13</small>
+
|keep=
  +
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDc|Making up Oscar Wilde quotes}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Adult}} ==
*Voters, see also [[Forum:Trimming back the Wilde Quotes‎‎]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:22 19-Feb-13</small>
+
{{Votervfd|time=15:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keepnumber=3.5
+
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Listcruft and mainly images near end. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Promising intro. I deleted the picture-book and other cruft. What is left is two gender-based tedious lists revolving around puberty and sex organs. Delete that and there would be almost nothing left. It ought to be saved, but there really is nothing funny about adulthood. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:36 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
# '''Half keep per Kip'''. It has significance. The issue is that this page, much like [[Vandalism/example on wheels!]], has a place on this site. But I'd replace most of the content with [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]] and make '''that''' the redirect. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:56 20 Feb 2013}}
 
#Entire vote per Kip. This is a historic page in uncy's history. As the source of the Oscar Wilde quotes, and the start of the in-joke, essential page. I like the plaque idea, to mark it as historic. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:51 21-2-'13
 
#{{Keep}} As the origin of the in-joke, this page should be kept. I too like the idea of a plaque. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}}. I also like the idea of plaque build-up. I'd work on said plaque, but would probably have my work replaced four hours later. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} redundant with [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]]. I finally got around to reading through this article and moving the good quotes (all 3 of them) to the other Wilde quote page, and I recently purged it too. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I feel the need to point out that this page has historical significance as the very origin of the Oscar Wilde in-joke. If anything, it deserves a clean-up and a plaque. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>09:56, Feb. 20, 2013</small>
+
#I deleted the listcruft, and added some text. Check it out and see what you think. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 04:38, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
*{{comment|@ pup & kip}} there is alot of overlap between this page and [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]]. Besides bad quotes, there is nothing of importance here that isn't at the unquotable page. I would actually prefer to move the unquotable to this name, per my crusade to delete the unquotable namespace. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:20, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
:* I would be {{for| }} merging Unquotable:Oscar Wilde with this namespace, but {{against| }} deleting Unquotable entirely. It's a valid parody of Wikiquotes and amusing when properly managed. Then again, what you do with your own Uncyclopedia is your business. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>02:52, Feb. 21, 2013</small>
 
----
 
*'''Vote closed.''' Broad support to keep. Ideas on restructuring our Wildeisms are still welcome in the [[Forum:Trimming back the Wilde Quotes|Forum]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 26-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Avogadro]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|That time I was plundered in the ass by a Viking during my voyage to a retirement villa}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The title is promising, but the article isn't. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:22 22-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:49, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|That time NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE during my sojourn on the internet}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=12:23, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=1
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This one is worse; provocation of black readers with utterly no comedy payback. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
#<s>Actually, the concept of this page is explained well [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive228#That_time_NIGGERS_STOLE_MY_PAGE_during_my_sojourn_on_the_internet|here]]. But with the original [[NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE]] article deleted, it doesn't really make sense. Sorry, Al. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:35, April 22, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=
  +
#The page is one of the most anti-racist pages we have here on uncy. In it's 2011 VFD attempt, in which it was [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive228#That_time_NIGGERS_STOLE_MY_PAGE_during_my_sojourn_on_the_internet saved by a vote of -6], some people understood that. I've just added more to make it clearer. The illustration, by the way, is a white man dressed up in blackface making fun of another white man dressed up in blackface. The links on the page take people to some of the original writing, but the page stands alone in explanation as a guy typing in his mother's basement. I'll add more to it later. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 13:15 22-4-14
  +
#With a link to the original page and more additions, it seems good enough to be kept. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:33, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
== {{VFDn|Patch Adams}} ==
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
{{VFDt|time=13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} There are many reasons for this nomination, and one of this, that many people agree with, is that if it was written by an anonymous editor, Patch Adams would probably be deleted immediately after its creation. I don't think Uncyclopedia benefits from such articles. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not an Uncyclopedia article. Also: not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:25 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#Not my favorite but many people love it for reasons unknown, and the concept was well explained somewhere. So for posterity I will hold my nose and vote to keep. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 13:22 22-4-14
  +
#:The concept doesn't change the fact that it is short and not extremely funny. Plus, as [[Uncyclopedia:VFH/Patcher Adams|Puppy once explained]], the image doesn't go well with the article. Even if the concept is clever, it will still be short and not extremely funny. Plus, the image still won't fit in the article. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:26, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 10:34, April 23, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Nick123 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Wasp H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 375 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "War with the Hornet(1500-2009) (The only section worth reading in this shitty article)" sums it up nicely. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Photo-less article's theme is dog turds, then the article itself, bickering with itself. I presume that, in 2007, the Rabbi was still amused at being an author and not so experienced as to do it right. Includes memes (Dubya? WMD?) and nonsense numbers. Spıke ¬ 23:04 7-Apr-14
Keep (1)
  1. Rabbi Techno's original seems fine, and held my interest enough to actually read the whole thing. Could use work and pictures though. Aleister 20:23 7-4-14
Comments

edit Welsh Congo H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 375 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Un-encyclopedic and random. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Welsh version of the Belgian (et al.) Congo could be fun if written by someone who knew something about Wales (other than its native translation) and about Africa. I've cleared up the worst here but it still lacks a reason to exist. Spıke ¬ 23:11 7-Apr-14

edit Alexander Graham Bell H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 375 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Do something with it, other than this randomness loosely bound to "Georg Dobbeyer Büch" (sadly, only a piped link to the usual Bush article). Spıke ¬ 23:14 7-Apr-14
Keep (1)
  1. The original isn't horribly bad. Or it can be deleted and redirected to Homophone, the article that almost turned me gay. Aleister 20:25 7-4-14
Comments

edit Fart filter H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 375 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Un-encyclopedic and not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:51, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If Tom Cruise were actually notorious for farting, then the article would have a comedy strategy. As is, it is just author's joy of writing fart jokes to strangers. The Fast Fart Transform could be the seed of a theme, but author doesn't take it anywhere — except "into the rectum." See above. Spıke ¬ 22:58 7-Apr-14
  3. blurp Aleister 19:19 8-4-14
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:07, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:04, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit That time I was nearly raped by the power rangers during my sojourn to the 90's H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 352 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I couldn't find this funny. Also, sorry for putting the twentieth nomination here. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:16, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. blurp Aleister 19:19 8-4-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spıke ¬ 09:51 9-Apr-14
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Target down. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:59, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:08, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Unquotable:Random unfunny quotes H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 257 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I was sorting out Unquotable when I came across this article. I don't think we should catalogue all the crap quotes too. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:09, April 12, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Every stupid thing Anon has typed into an article is not worth warehousing, less still assembling into monument by way of ranting about their stupidity. "Random unfunny quotes" are unfunny. Spıke ¬ 21:15 12-Apr-14
  3. randomly banning and deleting Aleister 12:28 13-4-14
  4. Symbol delete vote Ah, terrible Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:43, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Even the better ones are bad. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:17, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Alternate universe H T D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 214 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A main page that tries to be exactly the opposite of our main page. It's not very funny or even consistent in what it does ("Vote for featured image" instead of "Vote for the image with the worst quality", for example). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lame attempts at humor through rote translation of our main pages should use Babel instead. Spıke ¬ 12:23 14-Apr-14
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I like it. Simple and effective. For someone like me before I joined Uncyc this kind of page just made me laugh because it just ridicules the idea of an encyclopedia such as wikipedia. Only on Uncyclopedia can you get this. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:52, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Made me laugh, cry, salivate, and then hiccup. Aleister 18:50 20-4-14
Comments

edit Lightning H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 51 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Memish and lacks humour. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "Has been scientifically proven." Gassy phrases like this, and gassy initial quotations, will drive away the reader even before the Intro ends and the reader finds nothing left but dumb lists. Spıke ¬ 19:29 21-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adjective H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 51 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. First person. No humour. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "You are a FUCKING asshole." Stand-up comedy by an unfunny person. Spıke ¬ 19:27 21-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Admiral Ozzel H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 51 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Some good concepts however poorly written and mainly quotes. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The surfeit of quotes is easily fixable with a switchblade. The lack of humor, regarding a minor character in the Star Wars series, is not. Parents are "Incompetent Peep and Incompetent Person," and that is as close to funny as it gets. Confusion with Star Trek could be a theme but author takes it nowhere. Spıke ¬ 12:30 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Norbit H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 51 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, slightly memish and poorly written. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Read the outrageous plot at WP:Norbit#Plot. This blax-self-ploitation flick must get serviced by Uncyclopedia. Spıke ¬ 12:23 21-Apr-14
    And now has been. Spıke ¬ 12:31 22-Apr-14
Comments

edit Taking candy from strangers H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 51 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A thoroughly tedious read, about nothing. Spıke ¬ 12:02 21-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adolf Hilter H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 49 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Of all the Monty Python sketches out there "Mr. Hilter in England" is one of the greatest however this article does not give it justice at all. It uses unoriginal comedy from the sketch and fills the rest in with memes. If re-written, needs a re-write which honours Monty Python by having Mr. Hilter on an encyclopedia but is actually funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:02, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. That's our hitler page? I've never looked at it. Gas it and then redirect to one of the better pages (we can't leave a red link where hitler used to be). Aleister 12:25 21=4=14
    Actually Al, this feature here is our Hitler page. Read the title of the VFD page again and if you haven't seen the sketch I'd suggest watching it! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. In fact, we don't need an article that simply tries in vain to out-Python Monty Python. I agree that all of the humor here is either unoriginal or not humor. Spıke ¬ 13:03 21-Apr-14
  4. Delete --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:17, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:31, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Evil Illuminati Adolf Hitler Clone Society H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 48 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Poorly written, awful and not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2006-cruft; a Wacky Organization full of memes and devoid of humor. Repeated references to "Noam Particular" are and always have been red-links, with or without the middle name. Spıke ¬ 12:28 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adult H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 48 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listcruft and mainly images near end. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Promising intro. I deleted the picture-book and other cruft. What is left is two gender-based tedious lists revolving around puberty and sex organs. Delete that and there would be almost nothing left. It ought to be saved, but there really is nothing funny about adulthood. Spıke ¬ 12:36 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  1. I deleted the listcruft, and added some text. Check it out and see what you think. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:38, April 23, 2014 (UTC)

edit That time I was plundered in the ass by a Viking during my voyage to a retirement villa H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 22 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The title is promising, but the article isn't. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spıke ¬ 12:22 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit That time NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE during my sojourn on the internet H T D Survivor

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 22 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This one is worse; provocation of black readers with utterly no comedy payback. Spıke ¬ 12:23 22-Apr-14
  2. Actually, the concept of this page is explained well here. But with the original NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE article deleted, it doesn't really make sense. Sorry, Al. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:35, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. The page is one of the most anti-racist pages we have here on uncy. In it's 2011 VFD attempt, in which it was saved by a vote of -6, some people understood that. I've just added more to make it clearer. The illustration, by the way, is a white man dressed up in blackface making fun of another white man dressed up in blackface. The links on the page take people to some of the original writing, but the page stands alone in explanation as a guy typing in his mother's basement. I'll add more to it later. Aleister 13:15 22-4-14
  2. With a link to the original page and more additions, it seems good enough to be kept. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:33, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Patch Adams H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 21 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. There are many reasons for this nomination, and one of this, that many people agree with, is that if it was written by an anonymous editor, Patch Adams would probably be deleted immediately after its creation. I don't think Uncyclopedia benefits from such articles. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not an Uncyclopedia article. Also: not funny. Spıke ¬ 13:25 22-Apr-14
Keep (1)
  1. Not my favorite but many people love it for reasons unknown, and the concept was well explained somewhere. So for posterity I will hold my nose and vote to keep. Aleister 13:22 22-4-14
    The concept doesn't change the fact that it is short and not extremely funny. Plus, as Puppy once explained, the image doesn't go well with the article. Even if the concept is clever, it will still be short and not extremely funny. Plus, the image still won't fit in the article. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:26, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects