Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Pages for Deletion: +Inland Northwest)
({{VFDn|Borat Sagdiyev}}: Deleted)
 
(7,397 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get Expelled from School}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=12:50, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|A load of poopy.}} Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:50 11-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete|Delete.}} Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pupil misbehavior ''can'' be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at [[Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]]. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. [[User:Simsilikesims|Simsilikesims]] ([[User talk:Simsilikesims|talk]]) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Borat Sagdiyev}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDg|time=18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=5
== [[Inland Northwest]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=12:03, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Seems to be a simple retelling of the jokes from Borat's film. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Any author is free to re-create the article after devising an original comedy concept. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:19 14-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Parody of a parody.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:32, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Bad grammar is overdone. Filmography section fills up my screen. [[User:Ye Blacke Adder|Ye Blacke Adder]] ([[User talk:Ye Blacke Adder|talk]]) 06:15, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I think Sacha Baron Cohen beat you to it writer. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:41, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
{{Delete}} Written, and revised overnight with 2010 census numbers, overtly to boost the city of Boise, just irreverently enough to fit on a humor wiki. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:03 27-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[101 Things You Should Not Do]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Redirect}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:57, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
# {{Delete}} List {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|05:57 25 Feb 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=2
*{{Comment|Abstain.}} A playground for I.P. Anon and other drive-by writers of one-liners isn't optimal, but it's self-contained. The template, though, is awful: "This page is under perpetual construction... It is an ever changing work...." That is in fact a better description of [[Uncyclopedia:Sandbox]]. Better to get them to finish it, to flesh out each of the 100 themes into funny paragraphs, as I now try to do on its talk page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:11 25-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Unquotable:Arthur C. Clarke]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:30, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Good enough now. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:21 24-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
|delnumber=1
+
#{{Keep}} I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} This article is based on the assertion that Arthur C. Clarke claimed to invent everything, insults directed to other dead sci-fi authors, and poorly implemented jabs at his allegations pedophilia. There is a bit of concept here, but very little execution, and not much more potential. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 12:30, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I see Aleister at work here and am holding off. The original article hit the same buttons ''ad nauseam'' but did start with a perfectly fine concept. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:38 24-Feb-13</small>
+
*Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit ''à la'' "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
*:Never saw this page before, checked the history (remember the rule about looking for a better version in the history????) and found out it's a Mhaille page, and reverted to his last edit. So by being a Mhaille page I surmise it contains very good material, but don't have time to read it now. Am going other places now, and one of them has food. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:46 24-2-'13
+
*Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
*::Point to Aleister; nominator has the duty to make a token effort to find some quality somewhere, even during a purge of a namespace. I brought categories up to date after Aleister's mega-revert. Only the section on "tingle" seems to have no basis in reality, but maybe some of you recall something about Clarke that I don't. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:56 24-Feb-13</small>
+
*This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
*:::The content is basically the same. Although it was created by an established user, it was also created in 2006. There is ''some'' content, but it could be collapsed to half a dozen quotes without losing any information. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:12, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
*EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
*::To answer my own question, [[WP:Arthur C. Clarke]] does not contain the word "tingle" so I'll kill three of the quotes for you. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:16 24-Feb-13</small>
+
::Okay, great! I'll just finish my [[Sex change]] and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
:::Thanks a lot! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Anonymous]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:12, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A nice idea, but unfinished. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}}. This is a very specific vote for a very specific article. Wooga for life! -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:29 14-Jul-15</small>
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This page is, by its title, the epitome of scatter-shot. I would quote trim it, but this page has no theme. Is it trying to quote the internet cyber-terrorist group, or what? If so, the subject is too obscure. It is trying to compile every anonymous quote in the history of humanity? If so, the subject is too broad. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 12:12, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Starting with a nonsense year number in a preachy Intro before devolving into themelessness, this is another tribute to the namespace instead of a service to the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 24-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} This page fails on various levels, but mostly on a poor (or non-existent) concept. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:33 25 Feb 2013}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*[[Wikiquote:Anonymous]] is a real page, as is [[Wikiquote:Anonymous (group)]]. Theoretically there could be a valid page that is a parody of this, and this Unquotable page would be the ideal location. Sadly, the page at this location fails. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:33 25 Feb 2013}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:About]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|SGML}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:55, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} If we are going to have an Unquotable namespace--and, for the moment, we are--then why not have a page setting out a coherent plan for it? UnNews has several such, and they used to be helpful. Indeed policy should not be "spread across 5 or 6 pages" and if you can find a better spot at which to unify it, tell me where it went and I'll flip my vote. You might find this page a useful place to set down guidelines so that the cruft you have spent so much time editing doesn't creep back. Or we might flesh this out into deadpan praise of people's use of dead men's quotations to fluff up their unremarkable present-day rhetoric. We have found gassy text elsewhere and not deleted an entire page that otherwise has a purpose. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:43 23-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} [[WP:SuicideGirls|SuicideGirls]] seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
|delnumber=1
+
#{{Keep}} Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} unhelpful "about" page. The policy pages for unquotable are spread across 5 or 6 pages for no apparent reason, besides making the project look bigger than it actually is. What is said here could be said in one sentence. This has been unedited since 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:55, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*'''Renamed.''' Used to be [[Suicide Girl Markup Language]], but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Niggle}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It's a good example of Obfuscata, and probably should remain purely as that. Given it is Obfuscata, I don't see a huge argument for a rewrite of this to match a rewrite of the page it's a translation of. If the main page is rewritten to an extent that this is no longer relevant, then we can look at a rewrite of this at that stage. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:19 24 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{Keep}} Per above. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 02:35, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}}. Because, because, because, because, because. I'm serious about that last one. The first four are me being silly. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Reskin of the unquotable mainpage. And by "reskin" I mean text change. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Delete, again.}} This is seriously bad use of the English language. Yes, it is meant to make fun of same, but simply taking another Uncyclopedia page and making the English turgid is not heavy lifting nor as laughter-causing as focused, planned, engaging use of (perhaps with wry commentary on) bad English. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:52 23-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=*{{comment}} I plan on a doing a reworking on the quotable mainpage. However, the main link template is intertwined with the various reskin pages. Before I work on the quote mainpage, I need to see what the community wants to keep, so I am not wasting time reworking articles that are going to be deleted anyway. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:You have noted that the same text is transliterated multiple times into different "languages," but you could improve the Unquotable main page without the risk that we might compel you to apply your changes to Obfuscata in bad English, pirate-speak, etc. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:52 23-Feb-13</small>
 
*::The coding of [[Unquotable:MainArticleList]] (which is used as template) is horrible, generating different content on different pages because there is a different section of code for each page the template appears on. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 20:17, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:Horrible indeed! The template ("tricked out" in the ever-self-congratulatory words of {{U|Some user}}) special-cases itself based on who its caller is, to give each caller the "elegance" of calling the same, single template to achieve radically different effects! This is not so much a key part of our site heritage as a bomb planted especially deep! {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:42 23-Feb-13</small>
 
*{{comment|@ puppy}} if we need an article on Obfuscata, which would be a valid subject, it should be at [[Obfuscata]], not as a clone of a random navigation page. This article makes about as much sense as running [[Newtis Newtfield]] through a [[Swedish Chef]] translator and calling it the [[this page does not exist|Svedeesh Noot]]. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:16, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
::I agree that we should have an article at [[Obfuscata]] but the closest we have is at [[Obfuscation]]. I think this quotable page is a good example of Obfuscata, and we don't have an article at Obfuscata about the style of writing, so this should stay, at least until someone writes the Obfuscata page. You may consider this a challenge to write said page, if you like. Also, if someone ran Newtis Newtfield through a Swedish chef translator and called it the Sveedeesh Noot that would be funny. Redundant, but funny, particularly if it were linked as a see also from the main Newtis Newtfield article.{{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 02:40, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
   
==[[Unquotable:History of Unquotable]]==
+
{{VFDg|time=21:02, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=22:20, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=5
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} I fight for {{U|Some user}}. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 01:40, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:That is the corniest Tron reference I have seen in a long time. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:23 23 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{Keep}} Imrealized knows his history. This page, which I've never seen before, give the background of the Oscar quotes, something which uncyclopedia is infamous for. It outlines the start of the meme, and how it evolved. I don't understand why people want to delete the main pages of the Oscar Wilde quotes. The quotes themselves, when they are bad and are on good to stupid articles, sure, but not the historical pages themselves. What's the problem with leaving those few pages alone, especially one like this which educates about the beginning of a tradition. I stand with Imrealized in standing with Some user, who is sitting down and won't stand for himself. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 8:03 23-2-'13
 
#{{Keep}} I didn't want to be the only holdout, so I proposed originally to userspace this piece of Uncyc history so that it wouldn't get deleted outright. But I think that since it does mention former Uncyc admins in the story, it does deserve a place in Unquotable as Uncyc history. The UN:CM test also takes into account whether any of the admins might have heard of it, and I do remember one or two of the admins mentioned here, though they are no longer active on this site. Admittedly this story all happened before I chanced upon Uncyclopedia, but that is history for you. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 02:58, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#:How would you feel about it being moved to Uncyclopedia namespace? {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 25 Feb 2013}}
 
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Poorly written navelism. And as someone who actually digs into the history of this site and it's various facets, even I found this a most uninteresting chapter, as it's almost pure [[UN:CM]] stuff. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:20 21 Feb 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} Not funny, and there's a better version [[Niggers|here]]. {{Unsigned|EpicWinner}}
#{{Delete}} Namespace creator {{U|Some user}} sets down in print his personal story as persecuted artist. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:27 21-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Offensive while nowhere on the road to funny. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:15 25-Jul-15</small>
#{{delete}} nobody cares. This is somewhere between vanity and cracking wise with the navigation tools, with a dose of advocacy. This uses a whole article of ranting to explain history that could be said in a paragraph. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:42, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Unfunny offensive duplicruft. (Vote button is missing, so voting manually). --[[User:TotalCuddles02|TotalCuddles02]] ([[User talk:TotalCuddles02|talk]]) 12:20, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
#:History explained in one paragraph - today's educational system described. The best history is an eyewitness account of what occurred told by someone who was there, plus the thought process which went into the situations described. It would be nice to have as detailed an account of the creation of uncy and other aspects of the wiki as we have here about the step-by-step creation and thought processes concerning the start of the Oscar Wilde quotes. [[user:Aleister|''a random historian'']] 8:25 23-2-'13
+
#{{Delete}} Racism without decent humor. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 17:17, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:24, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
*This did not seem to me to focus quite exclusively on one user, but since that user is the main focus of the article, I propose we userspace this article to Some User's userspace. {{Unsigned|Simsilikesims}}
+
|keepnumber=0
*:Concur {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:12 22-Feb-13</small>
 
*::Deleted or in name space - either means it's not in general distribution. I'm happy with that. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:09 22 Feb 2013}}
 
}}
 
 
== [[Unquotable:Jesus Christ]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:12, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2.5
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep|Selfish half-keep}}. I've hacked, trimmed, added, hacked and polished again. Without completely changing the concept, this is significantly improved. It could be more designed as twisting scripture, but that doesn't fit with the “illiterate/didn't write it” concept, which I feel has merit, and could possibly become it's own article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|04:34 23 Feb 2013}}
 
#:"Twisting scripture" would imply that the invented quotations were actually based on something. This is the prerequisite for decent humor rather than rant--attributed to Jesus, as I say below at Hitler, not based on anything but desire for artificial melodrama. If the concept of the lists is inattention to the basis of humor, then it is not a "concept" you need to preserve. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:12 23-Feb-13</small>
 
#::There are two ways to do a page like this that make sense. One is to try and make the quotes as near to that original as possible. The second is to take the character of the subject and create quotes that fit with a parody of the character. This is a parody of the person, rather than a parody of sayings attributed to him. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:47 23 Feb 2013}}
 
#Puppy barks. And will probably keep on barking. Nice page. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 8:08 23-2-'13
 
#{{Keep}}. This vote is also specific, but in an entirely different way than the other vote. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete|Jesi-cruft}} 60% advocacy and 40% randumbo. 100% in the wrong tone. Only a couple quotes come close to being clever, and those are in the wrong tone. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:12, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*The Intro is downright good. On the rest of the article, my comments are the same as on the Hitler one. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:16 21-Feb-13</small>
+
*The alternative that nominator points to is not the same thing; if it were, the rules invite the nominator to revert the article to its best version. In this case, let's not even redirect, just make it go away. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:15 25-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Swedish_Chef]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:17, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{keep}}- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
 
#{{Keep}}. Bork, bork, bork! -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Another article that is the same concept as the mainspace article, only done worse. Granted, the mainspace article execution could use work, but quotification is hardly an improvement. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:17, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Unquotable fails utterly, and especially at imitating Wikiquotes, when the person being quoted is not a celebrity but a stock stereotype. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:30 19-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Muppet cruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:33 20 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{Delete}} The quotes here just aren't funny anymore (especially the dated stuff about G.W. Bush), and translating them into Sveedish Chef speek does not zee make zem foooney Bork Bork Bork! Besides, the Muppet Show in which the Swedish Chef muppet starred in was in its prime when I was in about 6th or 7th grade. The celebrity claim to fame of this muppet is so old that it has been forgotten and is no longer widely remembered. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 03:09, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:50, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=*{{comment}} we have a near identically themed page at for the [[Swedish Chef]] in mainspace. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:33, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
   
== [[Unquotable:Yoda]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=17:13, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
|keepnumber=3
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep}}- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
 
#{{Keep}} you must. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Just read this, and some of it is pretty good. You can't have enough good Yodaisms. I'll do some work on the page later. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 22:25 26-2-'13
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} 90% of the quotes are about sex, and 9% are Russian Reversals. There might be a couple quotes here that are funny, but I can't see justifying a page on the subject. The whole joke is the Yoda voice, which is done better than the quote format could ever be at [[Yoda]]. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 17:13, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|"Stroke my green penis, you will."}} Not just the Russian Reversals but everything on this page is imitative. The only authentic comedy was done by the creators of Yoda. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:28 19-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Muppet cruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:34 20 Feb 2013}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDc|Unquotable:Satan}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=4
 
|keep=
 
#{{keep}} Not a Muppet. Beyond that this is an example of what the namespace is good for. There's half a dozen decent one liners, but not enough content to call it an article of prose. Adding much more to this would potentially be overkill. Deleting this would be removing a page that has merit. Saying “It wouldn't survive in mainspace” is correct - and that's why we have other name spaces. This is better than 99% of [[:Category:My sojourn|My sojourn]] articles. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:43 20 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{keep}} Per above. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 06:50, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{keep}}- the Unquotable section of articles work together collectively allowing for running gags, viewing each as a stand alone article is, in my view, the wrong approach to dealing with this section of articles. -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}}
 
#{{Keep}}. TYUN! -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} this feels like the retarded step-brother of the [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/good-guy-lucifer/ Good Guy Lucifer meme]. This is a mixture of scattershot, advocacy, and general quotecruft. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} If anyone wants to write an article in the voice of Satan, I consider that a legitimate comedy strategy. This article is that strategy reduced to exactly listcruft. If any newbie wrote this in mainspace, any experienced editor would tell him that we are looking for funny paragraphs and not quips, slaps, and one-liners. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:25 19-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=*{{comment|At pup}} the problem with this is that there may be 6 good one-liners, but there are 20 quotes on the page. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:16, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
----
 
*'''Vote closed.''' No consensus to delete. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:03 26-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== {{VFDc|Making up Oscar Wilde quotes}} ==
+
{{VFDt|time=17:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
*Voters, see also [[Forum:Trimming back the Wilde Quotes‎‎]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:22 19-Feb-13</small>
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3.5
 
|keep=
 
# '''Half keep per Kip'''. It has significance. The issue is that this page, much like [[Vandalism/example on wheels!]], has a place on this site. But I'd replace most of the content with [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]] and make '''that''' the redirect. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|10:56 20 Feb 2013}}
 
#Entire vote per Kip. This is a historic page in uncy's history. As the source of the Oscar Wilde quotes, and the start of the in-joke, essential page. I like the plaque idea, to mark it as historic. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:51 21-2-'13
 
#{{Keep}} As the origin of the in-joke, this page should be kept. I too like the idea of a plaque. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}}. I also like the idea of plaque build-up. I'd work on said plaque, but would probably have my work replaced four hours later. -- {{User:Imrealized/sig}} 20:05, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
|delete=#{{delete}} redundant with [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]]. I finally got around to reading through this article and moving the good quotes (all 3 of them) to the other Wilde quote page, and I recently purged it too. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:30 28-Jul-15</small>
*I feel the need to point out that this page has historical significance as the very origin of the Oscar Wilde in-joke. If anything, it deserves a clean-up and a plaque. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>09:56, Feb. 20, 2013</small>
+
|keepnumber=1
*{{comment|@ pup & kip}} there is alot of overlap between this page and [[Unquotable:Oscar Wilde]]. Besides bad quotes, there is nothing of importance here that isn't at the unquotable page. I would actually prefer to move the unquotable to this name, per my crusade to delete the unquotable namespace. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:20, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 
:* I would be {{for| }} merging Unquotable:Oscar Wilde with this namespace, but {{against| }} deleting Unquotable entirely. It's a valid parody of Wikiquotes and amusing when properly managed. Then again, what you do with your own Uncyclopedia is your business. {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>02:52, Feb. 21, 2013</small>
 
----
 
*'''Vote closed.''' Broad support to keep. Ideas on restructuring our Wildeisms are still welcome in the [[Forum:Trimming back the Wilde Quotes|Forum]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:58 26-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Avogadro]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
#{{Keep}} With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:49, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 13:53, July 29, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit HowTo:Get Expelled from School H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 433 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote A load of poopy. Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:50 11-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--EStop (talk) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pupil misbehavior can be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. Simsilikesims (talk) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

edit Borat Sagdiyev H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 355 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seems to be a simple retelling of the jokes from Borat's film. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Any author is free to re-create the article after devising an original comedy concept. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:19 14-Jul-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Parody of a parody.--EStop (talk) 08:32, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bad grammar is overdone. Filmography section fills up my screen. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 06:15, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I think Sacha Baron Cohen beat you to it writer. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:41, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Redirect H T D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 354 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit à la "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  • Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  • EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, great! I'll just finish my Sex change and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--EStop (talk) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

edit The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 354 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A nice idea, but unfinished. --EStop (talk) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:29 14-Jul-15
Comments

edit SGML H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 218 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. SuicideGirls seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--EStop (talk) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Renamed. Used to be Suicide Girl Markup Language, but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15

edit Niggle H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 88 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, and there's a better version here. The preceding unsigned comment was added by EpicWinner (talk • contribs)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Offensive while nowhere on the road to funny. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:15 25-Jul-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unfunny offensive duplicruft. (Vote button is missing, so voting manually). --TotalCuddles02 (talk) 12:20, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Racism without decent humor. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 17:17, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 12:24, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The alternative that nominator points to is not the same thing; if it were, the rules invite the nominator to revert the article to its best version. In this case, let's not even redirect, just make it go away. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:15 25-Jul-15

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 88 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15

edit Exploding Testicles H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 20 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:30 28-Jul-15
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects