Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Terms of Use: Reply to POTR)
({{VFDc|Labor Party}}: to archive)
 
(7,421 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Chyna}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=23:18, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=5
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:18 7-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} I gave up after the first sentence. [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] ([[User talk:BrokenKnives|talk]]) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I'm with [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] on this one. I maybe got a ''little'' further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{For}} A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#:Why? Is the article internet famous? {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|A Day at the Barn with Hitler}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=01:55, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by {{U|Thetoastman}} in 2006. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:55 10-May-15</small>
|keepnumber=1
+
#{{Delete}} If it is not original work, it should go.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small>
+
*This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
+
*:To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:40 10-May-15</small>
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small>
+
*::Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small>
+
*:If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:31 25-May-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[2012 (Video Game)]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Al Qaeda Chicken}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:46, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=13:37, May 24, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 24-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#The game was deleted. This was just another advertisement for a crappy text adventure from a now banned user. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:46 15 Feb}}
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:28, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Per above. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:34 15-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
* On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual [[KFC]] article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Terms of Use]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=13:41, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A chatty article about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:41 25-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} This article's subject is too random and the title is WAY too long for anybody to stumble across it anyways. I also see absolutely no satirical value...period. [[image:TTMsig.jpeg]][[image:TTMsig2.png]] ([[User:Thetruemariozplaze|Profile]]) ([[User talk:Thetruemariozplaze|SPEAK!]]) 19:15, May 29, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#I believe I am the Admin to whom Mnbvcxz refers. The cases where I didn't realize something was a joke are numerous and legend. In the case I was thinking about, I patrolled an edit to this page and reported it in passing to Sannse without viewing the page as a whole. Although it does air grievances with Wikia and risks attracting trolling by resentful users and perhaps from the Fork, it is seriously funny. We ought to have room for a page imitating legalism, but with a litany not to "publish, copy, display, distribute, [or] put mayonnaise on"--especially when it already has a disclaimer at the start that it's not the real thing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:04 14-Feb-13</small>
 
#:Actually, Wikia is not mentioned in here at all. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:55 15 Feb}}
 
#::No, not by name; but some of the material seems to be motivated by real-world gripes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:07 15-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Too funny to let die. Besides, if you actually read it, or even scan it, you will realize it isn't the real thing, besides there's a disclaimer at the top pointing to the real thing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 07:05, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and soft redirect to Wikia's real terms of use. This fake page has confused even an admin, and isn't that funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDc|Glasses}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|Hemorrhoid}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
#{{Keep}} The intro has glimpses of brilliance; Section 1, despite its HowTo: tone, might be rescued; and the lists obviously have to go. <small>12:10</small> {{Keep|Saved.}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:42 14-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} We've seen worse. Admit it. It only needs to be improved just a little... --[[User:RockoRocks|RockoRocks]] ([[User talk:RockoRocks|talk]]) 17:54, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{keep}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 18:10, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Picked this one up on ICU, however it has existed since before 2009 so is too old for ICU. It is mostly made up of lists and not particularly amusing lists at that. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Admin {{U|Zim ulator}} swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 25-May-15</small>
*{{For|Kept}} via rewrite; Sv--me. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:44 15-Feb-13</small>
+
#:Sorry, I guess the final word does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 25-May-15</small>
}}
 
 
== [[The Gay Team]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:41, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Smallish, typographically ugly article presses two chronic Spike hot-buttons: (1) The title is a pun, and the reader has to already know the pun to enjoy the article; (2) The page is an Anon magnet, inviting grade-school humor from Anons who cannot do better than gay-bashing and puns. I have nothing against gay-bashing, if done with cleverness, but this is not it; and then again, if you were to write it, why would you misplace it here? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:41 13-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} really doesn't do anything the title-pun. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:47, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[:Category:Folk Force]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Ukrainian Nazi Party}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=19:48, May 26, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Nothing comparable on Wikipedia. Twelve different external links. It feels as though author wants me to read all the available evidence to support his point, which still isn't funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:48 26-May-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} category has been mostly emptied due to VFD. It is almost, but not quite, small enough to QVFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Again, this arc of Uncyclopedia pages is mostly untouched in 7 years, and Wikipedia has not heard of the Folk Force nor of the several members for which I searched. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:38 9-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[The Botanist]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Didarasq}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=23:02, May 27, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Not used anywhere on Wikipedia; Google it and you get references to this article. A ton of Finnish-language humor and a "Test" that is a list telling the same joke over and over. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:02 27-May-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:08 5-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 19:27, May 29, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Chyna H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 524 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). Spıke Ѧ 23:18 7-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I gave up after the first sentence. BrokenKnives (talk) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm with BrokenKnives on this one. I maybe got a little further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol for vote For. A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
    Why? Is the article internet famous? SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit A Day at the Barn with Hitler H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 473 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by Thetoastman in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:55 10-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it is not original work, it should go.--EStop (talk) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
    To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 10-May-15
    Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --EStop (talk) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
    If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 18:31 25-May-15

edit Al Qaeda Chicken H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 125 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. Spıke Ѧ 13:37 24-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual KFC article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

edit What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 101 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A chatty article about nothing. Spıke Ѧ 13:41 25-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article's subject is too random and the title is WAY too long for anybody to stumble across it anyways. I also see absolutely no satirical value...period. TTMsigTTMsig2 (Profile) (SPEAK!) 19:15, May 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hemorrhoid H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 92 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Admin Zim ulator swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. Spıke Ѧ 23:04 25-May-15
    Sorry, I guess the final word does. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 25-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Ukrainian Nazi Party H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 71 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing comparable on Wikipedia. Twelve different external links. It feels as though author wants me to read all the available evidence to support his point, which still isn't funny. Spıke Ѧ 19:48 26-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Didarasq H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 44 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not used anywhere on Wikipedia; Google it and you get references to this article. A ton of Finnish-language humor and a "Test" that is a list telling the same joke over and over. Spıke Ѧ 23:02 27-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects