Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Terms of Use: Reply to POTR)
({{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}})
 
(7,680 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get Expelled from School}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=12:50, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|A load of poopy.}} Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:50 11-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete|Delete.}} Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pupil misbehavior ''can'' be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at [[Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]]. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. [[User:Simsilikesims|Simsilikesims]] ([[User talk:Simsilikesims|talk]]) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Borat Sagdiyev}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Seems to be a simple retelling of the jokes from Borat's film. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|keepnumber=1
+
#{{Delete}} Any author is free to re-create the article after devising an original comedy concept. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:19 14-Jul-15</small>
|keep=
+
#{{Delete}} Parody of a parody.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:32, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13
+
#{{Delete}} Bad grammar is overdone. Filmography section fills up my screen. [[User:Ye Blacke Adder|Ye Blacke Adder]] ([[User talk:Ye Blacke Adder|talk]]) 06:15, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
 
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[2012 (Video Game)]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=12:46, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#The game was deleted. This was just another advertisement for a crappy text adventure from a now banned user. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:46 15 Feb}}
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:28, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Per above. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:34 15-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Terms of Use]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Redirect}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#I believe I am the Admin to whom Mnbvcxz refers. The cases where I didn't realize something was a joke are numerous and legend. In the case I was thinking about, I patrolled an edit to this page and reported it in passing to Sannse without viewing the page as a whole. Although it does air grievances with Wikia and risks attracting trolling by resentful users and perhaps from the Fork, it is seriously funny. We ought to have room for a page imitating legalism, but with a litany not to "publish, copy, display, distribute, [or] put mayonnaise on"--especially when it already has a disclaimer at the start that it's not the real thing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:04 14-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Keep}} The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
#:Actually, Wikia is not mentioned in here at all. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|07:55 15 Feb}}
+
#{{Keep}} I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
#::No, not by name; but some of the material seems to be motivated by real-world gripes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:07 15-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} Too funny to let die. Besides, if you actually read it, or even scan it, you will realize it isn't the real thing, besides there's a disclaimer at the top pointing to the real thing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 07:05, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and soft redirect to Wikia's real terms of use. This fake page has confused even an admin, and isn't that funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit ''à la'' "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
  +
*Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  +
*EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::Okay, great! I'll just finish my [[Sex change]] and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
:::Thanks a lot! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== {{VFDc|Glasses}} ==
+
== {{VFDn|The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} The intro has glimpses of brilliance; Section 1, despite its HowTo: tone, might be rescued; and the lists obviously have to go. <small>12:10</small> {{Keep|Saved.}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:42 14-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Keep}} We've seen worse. Admit it. It only needs to be improved just a little... --[[User:RockoRocks|RockoRocks]] ([[User talk:RockoRocks|talk]]) 17:54, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{keep}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 18:10, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Picked this one up on ICU, however it has existed since before 2009 so is too old for ICU. It is mostly made up of lists and not particularly amusing lists at that. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 08:19, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:29 14-Jul-15</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{For|Kept}} via rewrite; Sv--me. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:44 15-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[The Gay Team]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|SGML}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=18:41, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Smallish, typographically ugly article presses two chronic Spike hot-buttons: (1) The title is a pun, and the reader has to already know the pun to enjoy the article; (2) The page is an Anon magnet, inviting grade-school humor from Anons who cannot do better than gay-bashing and puns. I have nothing against gay-bashing, if done with cleverness, but this is not it; and then again, if you were to write it, why would you misplace it here? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:41 13-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
#{{delete}} really doesn't do anything the title-pun. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:47, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} [[WP:SuicideGirls|SuicideGirls]] seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*'''Renamed.''' Used to be [[Suicide Girl Markup Language]], but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[:Category:Folk Force]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Niggle}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=21:02, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny, and there's a better version [[Niggers|here]]. {{Unsigned|EpicWinner}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Offensive while nowhere on the road to funny. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:15 25-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Unfunny offensive duplicruft. (Vote button is missing, so voting manually). --[[User:TotalCuddles02|TotalCuddles02]] ([[User talk:TotalCuddles02|talk]]) 12:20, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Racism without decent humor. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 17:17, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} category has been mostly emptied due to VFD. It is almost, but not quite, small enough to QVFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:34, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Again, this arc of Uncyclopedia pages is mostly untouched in 7 years, and Wikipedia has not heard of the Folk Force nor of the several members for which I searched. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:38 9-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The alternative that nominator points to is not the same thing; if it were, the rules invite the nominator to revert the article to its best version. In this case, let's not even redirect, just make it go away. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:15 25-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[The Botanist]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:08 5-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=17:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=1
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
+
#{{Delete}} Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:30 28-Jul-15</small>
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
|keepnumber=1
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
|keep=
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
#{{Keep}} With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 23:54, July 28, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit HowTo:Get Expelled from School H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 419 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote A load of poopy. Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:50 11-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--EStop (talk) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pupil misbehavior can be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. Simsilikesims (talk) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

edit Borat Sagdiyev H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 340 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seems to be a simple retelling of the jokes from Borat's film. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Any author is free to re-create the article after devising an original comedy concept. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:19 14-Jul-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Parody of a parody.--EStop (talk) 08:32, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bad grammar is overdone. Filmography section fills up my screen. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 06:15, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Redirect H T D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 340 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit à la "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  • Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  • EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, great! I'll just finish my Sex change and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--EStop (talk) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

edit The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog H T D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 340 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:29 14-Jul-15
Comments

edit SGML H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 204 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. SuicideGirls seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15
Comments
  • Renamed. Used to be Suicide Girl Markup Language, but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15

edit Niggle H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 74 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, and there's a better version here. The preceding unsigned comment was added by EpicWinner (talk • contribs)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Offensive while nowhere on the road to funny. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:15 25-Jul-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unfunny offensive duplicruft. (Vote button is missing, so voting manually). --TotalCuddles02 (talk) 12:20, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Racism without decent humor. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 17:17, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The alternative that nominator points to is not the same thing; if it were, the rules invite the nominator to revert the article to its best version. In this case, let's not even redirect, just make it go away. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:15 25-Jul-15

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 74 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15

edit Exploding Testicles H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 6 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:30 28-Jul-15
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects