Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Polytechnic University of Bucharest)
({{VFDn|Dog}}: Tweak away)
 
(9,116 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
<!-- Why is the end stuff at the beginning? Because {VFDr} contains a form to nominate a new page that adds a section at the end. -->
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia voting pages]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Anarchy}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=02:53, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Has been under {{Tl|Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:53 14-Mar-16</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested. {{User:EStop/signature}} 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Lists. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:35, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
== [[Talk:Pizza Planet]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{U|MTTB}} blanked this page, and I tend to agree with him. If it weren't for the age of it I'd add it to QVFD, but it has floated around long enough that it should be VFD'd. It's not a comment or discussion on the article, but an attempt to write the article in the talk space. NRV. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:58 05 Feb}}
+
#{{Delete}} Reader might enjoy this if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:35 5-Apr-16</small>
#{{Delete}} We tend to let people say a lot of things about the article on the discussion page, but this is not discussion about the article at all; it is a submission. And NRV is right. Delete the talk page only. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:04 5-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
#{{delete}} I don't like using VFD to remove talk page clutter in principle, but I have better things to do than argue policy. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 21:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'. {{User:EStop/signature}} 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=
 
*Per conversation elsewhere - this is an entry for the talk page only. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:31 05 Feb}}
 
}}
 
 
== [[Al Obama]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:21, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} This is a copy of [[Alabama]] where author has transliterated every "Alabama" into "Al Obama". That is, if this pun occurs to you, you can type it into Uncyclopedia and see the pun in a real article. But you have already finished laughing, haven't you? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 3-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 20:48, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#If these things didn't take so much time I'd vote delete on most of them. [[user:Aleister|'''Al''']] 22:40 3-2-'13
 
#{{Delete}} Redundant redundancy. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:42, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Folk Force]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Colony of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} worse than [[Strings McPickens]] and many of its satellite articles that have already been deleted. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have become convinced of the non-notability of the Folk Force. This piece of Anon's personal fiction arc almost enters the genre of Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:10 5-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Where has this been hiding? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Strings McPickens]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=15:11, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} leader of the folk force. This article isn't as bad as the typical folk force article, but there isn't really a point to it either. If there was one article in the series that might not be bad enough to delete, this is probably it. However, I also dislike crappy orphaned articles hanging in space. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have been avoiding these votes because I don't know anything about the Folk Force. Surprise! neither does Wikipedia; nor about Strings McPickens. On this one, three paragraphs and one photo have been added since Anon created the page seven years ago. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:05 5-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Truly abandoned and orphaned. Now time to go. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[The Botanist]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{delete}} an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:08 5-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=11:52, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Paragraphs are short, generic slaps at the institution that will amuse no one other than the author. Cruft from 2006, substantially unchanged since then. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:52 1-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>15:11 26-Apr-16</small>
#{{delete}} typical town-cruft. Half generic and half about stuff that only some who went to that college would get. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:01, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Scooter]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=23:04, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
+
#{{Keep}} It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
|delete=
 
#Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 31 Jan}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 1-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Smoky Harry]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the [[Folk Force]]. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:15 1-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Moses Purple]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=04:45, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the [[Folk Force]] to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at [[Uncle Tom]] that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive-2015-10#Dog|Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15]] as it just took Featured Article [[Dogs]] and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and {{U|EStop}} voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at [[User:EStop/Dogs]]. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:50 3-May-16</small>
#{{Delete}} If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:41 31-Jan-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=*{{comment}} there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The new version is ready for the mainspace, once this is gone. {{User:EStop/signature}} 06:06, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
}}
 
 
== [[Polytechnic University of Bucharest]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:36, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete|Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!}} Has nothing original or funny to say about the institution before it descends into lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:36 28-Jan-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} this would be towncruft if the randumbo were taken out of it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:21, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{delete}} Beyond the question “Why do men have nipples?” it's schoolcruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:16 05 Feb}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Timer reset due to no VFD tag on article. There is now a VFD tag, 5 hours later. Also, this article is not just a rant - it tells a story of a jealous lover who went too far and killed his lover because he thought the dog was another lover. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 04:46, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
  +
*:Thanks for that! It seems we now have too many dogs and too little time. Can anyone go in and make the "rant" seem purposeful? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:17 4-May-16</small>
  +
*:PS--Having read it slowly, I doubt it and reassert my vote to delete it. This saga of performance art where the "encyclopedia article writer" can't write because he is irritated by the dog and despondent over the loss of his wife (before he killed her) amused the author, and might shock but will not amuse the reader. Save the wife, kill the article. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:58 4-May-16</small>
  +
*::I don't agree. The rant almost works, and the "comedy of surprise" element is there. But the replacement is better. This could be moved to [[Great Dane]] with minor tweaking and still work though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig1}} 22:13, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
  +
*:Tweak away. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:17 4-May-16</small>
 
}}
 
}}
 
== [[Harriet Tubman]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=05:32, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#{{keep}} Its about the subject, and probably the only way to make this article funny is to make it "racist," aka calling Tubman a property stealing terrorist. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:49, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
|comments=
 
* I'm adding this here based upon [{{fullurl:Talk:Harriet_Tubman|oldid=5642790}} this edit]. I'm not fussed one way or the other, so staying impartial, but adding this here to show the n00b how it's done. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|05:32 27 Jan}}
 
}}
 
 
== [[Unknown Jedi Council member]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:04, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#This one I will vote to save, and have done some fixes and a few additions. This page is like Funnybony's Womp Rats, a page about an unnamed Star Wars character who served on the Jedi council, a very important position earned by having control of the force, yes. And he is on the Star Wars template, so fans may look at the page in the near future. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 21:06 26-1-'13
 
#{{Keep}} Per above, and below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:00 5-Feb-13</small>
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
*<s>{{Delete}} Star Wars fan writes a page of dumbness about a subject he can't define and that no one will ever look up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:04 26-Jan-13</small></s> '''Rescinded''' based on work by Aleister. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
 
*<s>{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:20, January 26, 2013 (UTC)</s> per fixing. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Renamed (capitalization) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
 
* Based upon Al's working this survives, but it still reads like a “red shirt” biography. Which isn't a bad thing. One of the beauties of “Galaxy quest” movie was creating a character from a red shirt. So '''abstain erring on keep'''. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|06:53 02 Feb}}
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 22:17, May 4, 2016

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Expert3222 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Anarchy H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1243 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Has been under {{Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). Spıke Radiomicrophone02:53 14-Mar-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested.  EStop Easy button 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lists. ConCass2 (talk) 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 717 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:35 5-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". ConCass2 (talk) 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'.  EStop Easy button 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Colony of America H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 199 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. Spıke Radiomicrophone15:11 26-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

edit Dog H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 41 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15 as it just took Featured Article Dogs and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and EStop voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at User:EStop/Dogs. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:50 3-May-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. ConCass2 (talk) 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The new version is ready for the mainspace, once this is gone.  EStop Easy button 06:06, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Timer reset due to no VFD tag on article. There is now a VFD tag, 5 hours later. Also, this article is not just a rant - it tells a story of a jealous lover who went too far and killed his lover because he thought the dog was another lover. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:46, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
    Thanks for that! It seems we now have too many dogs and too little time. Can anyone go in and make the "rant" seem purposeful? Spıke Radiomicrophone12:17 4-May-16
    PS--Having read it slowly, I doubt it and reassert my vote to delete it. This saga of performance art where the "encyclopedia article writer" can't write because he is irritated by the dog and despondent over the loss of his wife (before he killed her) amused the author, and might shock but will not amuse the reader. Save the wife, kill the article. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:58 4-May-16
    I don't agree. The rant almost works, and the "comedy of surprise" element is there. But the replacement is better. This could be moved to Great Dane with minor tweaking and still work though. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 22:13, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
    Tweak away. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:17 4-May-16
Personal tools
projects