Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Polytechnic University of Bucharest)
({{VFDn|Worst 100 Sexual Perversions}}: Delete)
 
(6,246 intermediate revisions by 91 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Rasta Jesus}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=00:37, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#Do we really need an article on this? There seems to be nothing useful here, no concept or anything. We have plenty of Jesii already. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929003735}}
  +
#{{Delete|"Shit (literal shit)."}} I have no problem with the existence of the article, as it can be found with the Jesii nav-template. But this article starts with a fanboy tone, stops for a moment at the assertion that non-separatism is racist (which now in the US, I find serious and unfunny), and ends in history-of-the-future and lists. Bottom line, after the useful concept of a Rastafarian Christ, authors have nothing they actually want to say about him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:43 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Precious little to do with anything. Like the pic though. I guess that came from elsewhere? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:28, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Mark Rutte}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:38, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
== [[Talk:Pizza Planet]] ==
+
|delnumber=2
{{Votervfd|time=08:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Spotted by {{U|Llwy-ar-lawr}}. Imported from the Dutch Uncyclopedia last year as the only contribution of {{U|Burgerhallojan}}, seemingly translated by machine, poorly; minimal attempt to clean up and tons of red-links. Notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, but the reader will be straining too hard to read the "English" to laugh. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:38 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Yeah. That. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929004446}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
|comments=*Actually, Spike did see it, and [[User talk:Burgerhallojan|commented to its author]] about it, but, er... this sentence ought to have a sensible ending and I just can't think of one. Maybe this is a pointless comment and I should go back to sleep. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929004446}}
|delete=
 
#{{U|MTTB}} blanked this page, and I tend to agree with him. If it weren't for the age of it I'd add it to QVFD, but it has floated around long enough that it should be VFD'd. It's not a comment or discussion on the article, but an attempt to write the article in the talk space. NRV. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:58 05 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} We tend to let people say a lot of things about the article on the discussion page, but this is not discussion about the article at all; it is a submission. And NRV is right. Delete the talk page only. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:04 5-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} I don't like using VFD to remove talk page clutter in principle, but I have better things to do than argue policy. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 21:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Per conversation elsewhere - this is an entry for the talk page only. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:31 05 Feb}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Al Obama]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Trailer Park Boys}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=18:21, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} This is a copy of [[Alabama]] where author has transliterated every "Alabama" into "Al Obama". That is, if this pun occurs to you, you can type it into Uncyclopedia and see the pun in a real article. But you have already finished laughing, haven't you? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 3-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 20:48, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#If these things didn't take so much time I'd vote delete on most of them. [[user:Aleister|'''Al''']] 22:40 3-2-'13
 
#{{Delete}} Redundant redundancy. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:42, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Folk Force]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=20:47, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} No redeeming qualities; the subject must have been funnier than this listcrufty report on it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:47 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Listing badly but take that away, there would be very little left. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:24, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{delete|Being really fucking awesome. Its a serious crime. Dont fuck with them.}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929223441}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} worse than [[Strings McPickens]] and many of its satellite articles that have already been deleted. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have become convinced of the non-notability of the Folk Force. This piece of Anon's personal fiction arc almost enters the genre of Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:10 5-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Where has this been hiding? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Strings McPickens]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=15:51, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} User-optional code to render the names of Admins in bold in reports and diff pages is tedious to keep current, and there is no evidence that anyone uses it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:51 30-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Looks like we don't need this. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930161406}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Don't know what this is, but I don't like it. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:21, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} leader of the folk force. This article isn't as bad as the typical folk force article, but there isn't really a point to it either. If there was one article in the series that might not be bad enough to delete, this is probably it. However, I also dislike crappy orphaned articles hanging in space. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have been avoiding these votes because I don't know anything about the Folk Force. Surprise! neither does Wikipedia; nor about Strings McPickens. On this one, three paragraphs and one photo have been added since Anon created the page seven years ago. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:05 5-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Truly abandoned and orphaned. Now time to go. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The main reason for highlighting admins that I know of is to make it easier to flag down active ones--hence the original code that highlighted them only in recent changes, which both sites have now done away with. Highlighting them anywhere else is excessive and obnoxious, IMHO. Since we've taken the approach of making bold admins an optional CSS thing, it seems likely to me that anyone who is experienced enough to know how to use it is also experienced enough to know the active admins' names by heart, or at least where to go to get their attention. That certainly applies to me; I know who has what rights here and I've never had any use for calling them out beyond a desire to make things flashier. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930161406}}<br>And besides, we already have a link to [[Uncyclopedia:Active Admins]] at the top of recent changes, in that grey box thingy, so even the original purpose of the bold names doesn't hold any water. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930163337}}
  +
*:One use for our code is that it highlights edits by Admins in a diff report or a page history, for the benefit of users who are hesitant to override Admins. Separately and again, what any other website does is not a factor here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:43 30-Sep-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[The Botanist]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Empire: Total War}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:08 5-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=22:48, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=11:52, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Paragraphs are short, generic slaps at the institution that will amuse no one other than the author. Cruft from 2006, substantially unchanged since then. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:52 1-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Aside from the overuse of strikethrough and {{C|Censored}}, this article is full of exact dates and links to data on external websites. It was surely written not to amuse but to record the history of this game and certain gamers' gripes against the manufacturers and their difficult implementations. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:48 30-Sep-14</small>
#{{delete}} typical town-cruft. Half generic and half about stuff that only some who went to that college would get. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|Yawn!}} Simply a huge collection of fact, rather than humour and, as Spike says, is just a massive rant. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 06:37, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:01, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#So boring I barely read past the intro. I'm just going to assume the whole thing is like that. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141001221249}}
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Scooter]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=23:04, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 31 Jan}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 1-Feb-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Smoky Harry]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Worst 100 Songs Referencing Paedophilia}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=18:07, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A catalog rather than humor. Includes songs obviously about pedophilia, songs that are not but could be construed so, songs about sex under the age of majority but above the age of consent, songs about puppy-love, and songs with none of the above. Some items are accompanied by a quip or wisecrack, some are not, none have well-developed original humor. The page is about the joy of lechery (and "paedophilia" as meme) rather than the joy of writing comedy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:07 1-Oct-14</small>
  +
#Seems to mainly be written in order to make a point. The point falls flat anyhow. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141001221346}}
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 06:36, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the [[Folk Force]]. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:15 1-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Moses Purple]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Worst 100 Sexual Perversions}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=06:34, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the [[Folk Force]] to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at [[Uncle Tom]] that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Didn't find anything funny there. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 06:34, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:41 31-Jan-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Formula: Take anyone or anything, imagine humping it, append "-philia" and create a new disease. It would be an improvement if the article did this ''only'' 100 times. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:15 2-Oct-14</small>
|comments=*{{comment}} there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
== [[Polytechnic University of Bucharest]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:36, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete|Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!}} Has nothing original or funny to say about the institution before it descends into lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:36 28-Jan-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} this would be towncruft if the randumbo were taken out of it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:21, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{delete}} Beyond the question “Why do men have nipples?” it's schoolcruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:16 05 Feb}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
== [[Harriet Tubman]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=05:32, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#{{keep}} Its about the subject, and probably the only way to make this article funny is to make it "racist," aka calling Tubman a property stealing terrorist. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:49, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
|comments=
 
* I'm adding this here based upon [{{fullurl:Talk:Harriet_Tubman|oldid=5642790}} this edit]. I'm not fussed one way or the other, so staying impartial, but adding this here to show the n00b how it's done. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|05:32 27 Jan}}
 
}}
 
 
== [[Unknown Jedi Council member]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:04, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#This one I will vote to save, and have done some fixes and a few additions. This page is like Funnybony's Womp Rats, a page about an unnamed Star Wars character who served on the Jedi council, a very important position earned by having control of the force, yes. And he is on the Star Wars template, so fans may look at the page in the near future. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 21:06 26-1-'13
 
#{{Keep}} Per above, and below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:00 5-Feb-13</small>
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
*<s>{{Delete}} Star Wars fan writes a page of dumbness about a subject he can't define and that no one will ever look up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:04 26-Jan-13</small></s> '''Rescinded''' based on work by Aleister. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
 
*<s>{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:20, January 26, 2013 (UTC)</s> per fixing. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Renamed (capitalization) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
 
* Based upon Al's working this survives, but it still reads like a “red shirt” biography. Which isn't a bad thing. One of the beauties of “Galaxy quest” movie was creating a character from a red shirt. So '''abstain erring on keep'''. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|06:53 02 Feb}}
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 11:15, October 2, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Rasta Jesus H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 82 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Do we really need an article on this? There seems to be nothing useful here, no concept or anything. We have plenty of Jesii already. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:37 29 Sep 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote "Shit (literal shit)." I have no problem with the existence of the article, as it can be found with the Jesii nav-template. But this article starts with a fanboy tone, stops for a moment at the assertion that non-separatism is racist (which now in the US, I find serious and unfunny), and ends in history-of-the-future and lists. Bottom line, after the useful concept of a Rastafarian Christ, authors have nothing they actually want to say about him. Spıke ¬ 00:43 29-Sep-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Precious little to do with anything. Like the pic though. I guess that came from elsewhere? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:28, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Mark Rutte H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 82 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spotted by Llwy-ar-lawr. Imported from the Dutch Uncyclopedia last year as the only contribution of Burgerhallojan, seemingly translated by machine, poorly; minimal attempt to clean up and tons of red-links. Notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, but the reader will be straining too hard to read the "English" to laugh. Spıke ¬ 00:38 29-Sep-14
  2. Yeah. That. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:44 29 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Actually, Spike did see it, and commented to its author about it, but, er... this sentence ought to have a sensible ending and I just can't think of one. Maybe this is a pointless comment and I should go back to sleep. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:44 29 Sep 2014

edit Trailer Park Boys H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 62 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming qualities; the subject must have been funnier than this listcrufty report on it. Spıke ¬ 20:47 29-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listing badly but take that away, there would be very little left. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:24, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Being really fucking awesome. Its a serious crime. Dont fuck with them. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 22:34 29 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎ H T D Tag article

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 43 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. User-optional code to render the names of Admins in bold in reports and diff pages is tedious to keep current, and there is no evidence that anyone uses it. Spıke ¬ 15:51 30-Sep-14
  2. Looks like we don't need this. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:14 30 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't know what this is, but I don't like it. ConCass2 (talk) 19:21, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The main reason for highlighting admins that I know of is to make it easier to flag down active ones--hence the original code that highlighted them only in recent changes, which both sites have now done away with. Highlighting them anywhere else is excessive and obnoxious, IMHO. Since we've taken the approach of making bold admins an optional CSS thing, it seems likely to me that anyone who is experienced enough to know how to use it is also experienced enough to know the active admins' names by heart, or at least where to go to get their attention. That certainly applies to me; I know who has what rights here and I've never had any use for calling them out beyond a desire to make things flashier. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:14 30 Sep 2014
    And besides, we already have a link to Uncyclopedia:Active Admins at the top of recent changes, in that grey box thingy, so even the original purpose of the bold names doesn't hold any water. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:33 30 Sep 2014
    One use for our code is that it highlights edits by Admins in a diff report or a page history, for the benefit of users who are hesitant to override Admins. Separately and again, what any other website does is not a factor here. Spıke ¬ 16:43 30-Sep-14

edit Empire: Total War H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 36 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Aside from the overuse of strikethrough and Censored, this article is full of exact dates and links to data on external websites. It was surely written not to amuse but to record the history of this game and certain gamers' gripes against the manufacturers and their difficult implementations. Spıke ¬ 22:48 30-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Yawn! Simply a huge collection of fact, rather than humour and, as Spike says, is just a massive rant. ConCass2 (talk) 06:37, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
  3. So boring I barely read past the intro. I'm just going to assume the whole thing is like that. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 22:12 1 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Worst 100 Songs Referencing Paedophilia H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 17 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A catalog rather than humor. Includes songs obviously about pedophilia, songs that are not but could be construed so, songs about sex under the age of majority but above the age of consent, songs about puppy-love, and songs with none of the above. Some items are accompanied by a quip or wisecrack, some are not, none have well-developed original humor. The page is about the joy of lechery (and "paedophilia" as meme) rather than the joy of writing comedy. Spıke ¬ 18:07 1-Oct-14
  2. Seems to mainly be written in order to make a point. The point falls flat anyhow. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 22:13 1 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 06:36, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Worst 100 Sexual Perversions H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 4 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Didn't find anything funny there. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 06:34, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Formula: Take anyone or anything, imagine humping it, append "-philia" and create a new disease. It would be an improvement if the article did this only 100 times. Spıke ¬ 11:15 2-Oct-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects