Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Polytechnic University of Bucharest)
({{VFDn|Sudden Instant Death Syndrome}}: Deleted)
 
(6,870 intermediate revisions by 97 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Vietnamese}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDg|time=17:42, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --[[User:Precious Star|Precious Star]] ([[User talk:Precious Star|talk]]) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:05 20-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Just when you think all the ancient junk has gone...this one pops up! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:43, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#An attempt to look nice at the expense of anything remotely intelligent. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141122000235}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Chav/Translations}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDg|time=17:28, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
== [[Talk:Pizza Planet]] ==
+
|delnumber=5
{{Votervfd|time=08:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{U|MTTB}} blanked this page, and I tend to agree with him. If it weren't for the age of it I'd add it to QVFD, but it has floated around long enough that it should be VFD'd. It's not a comment or discussion on the article, but an attempt to write the article in the talk space. NRV. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:58 05 Feb}}
+
#{{Delete}} I don't think this is particularly funny or worth keeping. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:28, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} We tend to let people say a lot of things about the article on the discussion page, but this is not discussion about the article at all; it is a submission. And NRV is right. Delete the talk page only. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:04 5-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Various editors (overwhelmingly Anons) have used this overlong list to catalog the "funny" things that chavs say rather than write original humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:52 21-Nov-14</small>
#{{delete}} I don't like using VFD to remove talk page clutter in principle, but I have better things to do than argue policy. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 21:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The same joke repeated hundreds of times --[[User:Precious Star|Precious Star]] ([[User talk:Precious Star|talk]]) 19:26, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Flypaper. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:46, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
*Per conversation elsewhere - this is an entry for the talk page only. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:31 05 Feb}}
+
#Can't tell if all this stuff is even about chavs at all. In any case, it's not of much use. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141122000658}}
}}
 
 
== [[Al Obama]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:21, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} This is a copy of [[Alabama]] where author has transliterated every "Alabama" into "Al Obama". That is, if this pun occurs to you, you can type it into Uncyclopedia and see the pun in a real article. But you have already finished laughing, haven't you? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 3-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 20:48, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#If these things didn't take so much time I'd vote delete on most of them. [[user:Aleister|'''Al''']] 22:40 3-2-'13
 
#{{Delete}} Redundant redundancy. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:42, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Folk Force]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|SEHS}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} worse than [[Strings McPickens]] and many of its satellite articles that have already been deleted. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have become convinced of the non-notability of the Folk Force. This piece of Anon's personal fiction arc almost enters the genre of Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:10 5-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Where has this been hiding? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Strings McPickens]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:15, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} leader of the folk force. This article isn't as bad as the typical folk force article, but there isn't really a point to it either. If there was one article in the series that might not be bad enough to delete, this is probably it. However, I also dislike crappy orphaned articles hanging in space. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I have been avoiding these votes because I don't know anything about the Folk Force. Surprise! neither does Wikipedia; nor about Strings McPickens. On this one, three paragraphs and one photo have been added since Anon created the page seven years ago. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:05 5-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} SEHS being "Sudden Head Exploding Syndrome," a Wacky Ailment with which to piggyback off [[A splode]] in this article from 2005, which has little to say about the ailment no one will look up except that it runs in things — and American politicians — the authors don't happen to like. Before deleting the external links, I didn't follow them, so I can't say whether this entire Syndrome was invented at an external website, as our recent "Dihydrogen monoxide" was. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:15 22-Nov-14</small>
#{{Delete}} Truly abandoned and orphaned. Now time to go. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Unlike [[Dihydrogen monoxide]], this doesn't deserve an article. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123001312}}
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} It's not terrible, but it's not good either. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 02:22, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
}}
 
 
== [[The Botanist]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:08 5-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Sudden Instant Death Syndrome}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:52, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Paragraphs are short, generic slaps at the institution that will amuse no one other than the author. Cruft from 2006, substantially unchanged since then. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:52 1-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} typical town-cruft. Half generic and half about stuff that only some who went to that college would get. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:01, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
==[[Scooter]]==
+
{{VFDg|time=00:25, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=23:04, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=5
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 31 Jan}}
+
#From the redundant and made-up title to the random lists of nonsensical items such as masturbating kittens, this article is about essentially nothing. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123002536}}
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Dead Baby Humor has to be especially good to be funny. This article, by comparison, uses most of the trite themes in the book: Author discussing himself, author apparently with A.D.D., "nobody knows anything," listcruft, memecruft, history-of-the-future, and another list of Notable Sufferers, inviting cyberbullying and not being disappointed in the response. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:16 23-Nov-14</small>
*German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 1-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Stupid. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 02:14, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
}}
+
#{{Delete}} HowTo:Not write an article {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 06:04, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Not funny at all. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 23:54, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
== [[Smoky Harry]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the [[Folk Force]]. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:15 1-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*It hardly discusses babies anyway. Only two paragraphs at the end. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123013038}}
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Moses Purple]] ==
+
== {{VFDc|Samuel L. Vacuum}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the [[Folk Force]] to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at [[Uncle Tom]] that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:41 31-Jan-13</small>
 
|comments=*{{comment}} there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
   
== [[Polytechnic University of Bucharest]] ==
+
{{VFDg|time=00:32, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=21:36, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete|Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!}} Has nothing original or funny to say about the institution before it descends into lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:36 28-Jan-13</small>
+
#Article begins with an unimpressive sentence, explains in tedious detail why said unimpressive sentence is a comedic masterpiece, and ends with a gratuitous instance of {{tl|USERNAME}}. Was voted onto the front page by a group of editors who are mostly no longer here. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123003229}}
#{{delete}} this would be towncruft if the randumbo were taken out of it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:21, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|Navelism.}} Yes, it was a feature, a VFD moved to VFH by fallen-away editors who reveled in their freedom to feature a thoroughly bad article. That was not amusing the reader but self-amusement, a prank not a joke, and that goes for the article as well. No one will look for this transformation of Samuel L. Jackson's name, no one will laugh at the emphasis on Jackson's blackness, and after that sentence, no one will enjoy author's essay about trying to write an article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:21 23-Nov-14</small>
#{{delete}} Beyond the question “Why do men have nipples?” it's schoolcruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:16 05 Feb}}
+
#{{Delete}} Considering that there are already two save votes, this article probably won't go. But I reckon that this article would be much funnier if it were actually ''about'' Samuel L Vacuum as opposed to plain navelism along the lines of "here's why it's funny". [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#:It was about Samuel L. Vacuum before it was rewritten to be about how terrible that concept was; see Comments. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123170359}}
}}
 
 
== [[Harriet Tubman]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=05:32, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#{{keep}} Its about the subject, and probably the only way to make this article funny is to make it "racist," aka calling Tubman a property stealing terrorist. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:49, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
|comments=
 
* I'm adding this here based upon [{{fullurl:Talk:Harriet_Tubman|oldid=5642790}} this edit]. I'm not fussed one way or the other, so staying impartial, but adding this here to show the n00b how it's done. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|05:32 27 Jan}}
 
}}
 
 
== [[Unknown Jedi Council member]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:04, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#This one I will vote to save, and have done some fixes and a few additions. This page is like Funnybony's Womp Rats, a page about an unnamed Star Wars character who served on the Jedi council, a very important position earned by having control of the force, yes. And he is on the Star Wars template, so fans may look at the page in the near future. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 21:06 26-1-'13
+
#{{Keep|A Classic.}} Hilarious and clever. This is not about writing an Uncyclopedia article. It's a parody of comedy writing in general and critique of the overuse of memes in place of actual jokes. This was one of the first articles I read on Uncyclopedia and one of the first to get me interested in this site, so I would think that there are others who find it amusing as well. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 02:21, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Keep}} Per above, and below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:00 5-Feb-13</small>
+
#:Mocking bad writing by imitating it simply produces a bad page. Your apparent knowledge of the point of this pointless article is not evident by reading the article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:36 23-Nov-14</small>
|delnumber=0
+
#{{Keep|New low.}} Deleting featured articles? Petty petty. I don't particularly like it but enough people voted for it to highlight the site that you can't outright delete it. --[[User:Nikau|Nikau]] ([[User talk:Nikau|talk]]) 06:28, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=
+
#:Some featured articles can be utter shite. This one isn't terrible, but if it was exactly as it is now and didn't have the "featured" at the top, it would be VFD material. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
*<s>{{Delete}} Star Wars fan writes a page of dumbness about a subject he can't define and that no one will ever look up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:04 26-Jan-13</small></s> '''Rescinded''' based on work by Aleister. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
+
#::This vote ought to be disregarded because it is based not on the quality of the article, but on an objection to the policy. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123170235}}
*<s>{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:20, January 26, 2013 (UTC)</s> per fixing. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:::More problematic is disparaging fellow voters ("Petty petty"), a trend I thought had stopped when Shabidoo threw his Wikia pass-key down the gutter. However, you started it with the comment below, which suggests that a goal was to purge the site of a specific author. I famously enforce civility not with creative vote counting but with the ban-stick. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:25 23-Nov-14</small>
  +
#::::I find it ironic that you would call Nikau's comment one that disparages other users and at the same time call my opinion of the article "apparent knowledge" that "is not evident by reading the article." That's a tad belittling, wouldn't you say? --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:17, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:::No I wouldn't, not ironic, not disparaging, and not belittling. I asserted that your statement about the point of the article is not evident from reading the article, that's all. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:18 23-Nov-14</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Renamed (capitalization) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
+
*While it was created by {{u|Evilcorporatemetaljesus}}, it was [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Samuel_L._Vacuum?diff=3315753&oldid=3294717 rewritten] by {{u|Mrmonkey72}}. Adding this because its original creator was mentioned in another discussion as having written this and other poor-quality articles. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123004021}}
* Based upon Al's working this survives, but it still reads like a “red shirt” biography. Which isn't a bad thing. One of the beauties of “Galaxy quest” movie was creating a character from a red shirt. So '''abstain erring on keep'''. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|06:53 02 Feb}}
+
*The current policy at Uncyclopedia is to protect featured articles. If anyone feels strongly about this then a forum can be created to discuss it there. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:36, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*24 hours hasn't yet elapsed. Other articles are allowed more time; shouldn't this stay open a tad longer? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123231105}}
  +
:FA's don't go to VFD; that is a long standing policy. This matter can be discussed in a forum if required. I would vote to keep this one regardless as evidently lots of people found it funny at one point. --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 11:39, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 00:16, November 25, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Llwy-ar-lawr • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Vietnamese H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 139 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --Precious Star (talk) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. Spıke ¬ 18:05 20-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. ConCass2 (talk) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Just when you think all the ancient junk has gone...this one pops up! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:43, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. An attempt to look nice at the expense of anything remotely intelligent. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:02 22 Nov 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Chav/Translations H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 115 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't think this is particularly funny or worth keeping. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:28, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Various editors (overwhelmingly Anons) have used this overlong list to catalog the "funny" things that chavs say rather than write original humor. Spıke ¬ 17:52 21-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The same joke repeated hundreds of times --Precious Star (talk) 19:26, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Flypaper. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:46, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Can't tell if all this stuff is even about chavs at all. In any case, it's not of much use. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:06 22 Nov 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit SEHS H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 87 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. SEHS being "Sudden Head Exploding Syndrome," a Wacky Ailment with which to piggyback off A splode in this article from 2005, which has little to say about the ailment no one will look up except that it runs in things — and American politicians — the authors don't happen to like. Before deleting the external links, I didn't follow them, so I can't say whether this entire Syndrome was invented at an external website, as our recent "Dihydrogen monoxide" was. Spıke ¬ 21:15 22-Nov-14
  2. Unlike Dihydrogen monoxide, this doesn't deserve an article. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:13 23 Nov 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's not terrible, but it's not good either. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:22, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Sudden Instant Death Syndrome H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 84 hours
Delete (5)
  1. From the redundant and made-up title to the random lists of nonsensical items such as masturbating kittens, this article is about essentially nothing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:25 23 Nov 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Dead Baby Humor has to be especially good to be funny. This article, by comparison, uses most of the trite themes in the book: Author discussing himself, author apparently with A.D.D., "nobody knows anything," listcruft, memecruft, history-of-the-future, and another list of Notable Sufferers, inviting cyberbullying and not being disappointed in the response. Spıke ¬ 01:16 23-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Stupid. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:14, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. HowTo:Not write an article ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Icons-flag-au 06:04, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny at all. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:54, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It hardly discusses babies anyway. Only two paragraphs at the end. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:30 23 Nov 2014

edit 🔒 Samuel L. Vacuum H T D Survivor Oldvfd Archive

Score: 1 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 84 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Article begins with an unimpressive sentence, explains in tedious detail why said unimpressive sentence is a comedic masterpiece, and ends with a gratuitous instance of {{USERNAME}}. Was voted onto the front page by a group of editors who are mostly no longer here. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:32 23 Nov 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Navelism. Yes, it was a feature, a VFD moved to VFH by fallen-away editors who reveled in their freedom to feature a thoroughly bad article. That was not amusing the reader but self-amusement, a prank not a joke, and that goes for the article as well. No one will look for this transformation of Samuel L. Jackson's name, no one will laugh at the emphasis on Jackson's blackness, and after that sentence, no one will enjoy author's essay about trying to write an article. Spıke ¬ 01:21 23-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Considering that there are already two save votes, this article probably won't go. But I reckon that this article would be much funnier if it were actually about Samuel L Vacuum as opposed to plain navelism along the lines of "here's why it's funny". ConCass2 (talk) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    It was about Samuel L. Vacuum before it was rewritten to be about how terrible that concept was; see Comments. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:03 23 Nov 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote A Classic. Hilarious and clever. This is not about writing an Uncyclopedia article. It's a parody of comedy writing in general and critique of the overuse of memes in place of actual jokes. This was one of the first articles I read on Uncyclopedia and one of the first to get me interested in this site, so I would think that there are others who find it amusing as well. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:21, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    Mocking bad writing by imitating it simply produces a bad page. Your apparent knowledge of the point of this pointless article is not evident by reading the article. Spıke ¬ 14:36 23-Nov-14
  2. Symbol keep vote New low. Deleting featured articles? Petty petty. I don't particularly like it but enough people voted for it to highlight the site that you can't outright delete it. --Nikau (talk) 06:28, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    Some featured articles can be utter shite. This one isn't terrible, but if it was exactly as it is now and didn't have the "featured" at the top, it would be VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 11:26, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    This vote ought to be disregarded because it is based not on the quality of the article, but on an objection to the policy. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:02 23 Nov 2014
    More problematic is disparaging fellow voters ("Petty petty"), a trend I thought had stopped when Shabidoo threw his Wikia pass-key down the gutter. However, you started it with the comment below, which suggests that a goal was to purge the site of a specific author. I famously enforce civility not with creative vote counting but with the ban-stick. Spıke ¬ 17:25 23-Nov-14
    I find it ironic that you would call Nikau's comment one that disparages other users and at the same time call my opinion of the article "apparent knowledge" that "is not evident by reading the article." That's a tad belittling, wouldn't you say? --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:17, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
    No I wouldn't, not ironic, not disparaging, and not belittling. I asserted that your statement about the point of the article is not evident from reading the article, that's all. Spıke ¬ 22:18 23-Nov-14
Comments
  • While it was created by Evilcorporatemetaljesus, it was rewritten by Mrmonkey72. Adding this because its original creator was mentioned in another discussion as having written this and other poor-quality articles. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 00:40 23 Nov 2014
  • The current policy at Uncyclopedia is to protect featured articles. If anyone feels strongly about this then a forum can be created to discuss it there. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:36, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
  • 24 hours hasn't yet elapsed. Other articles are allowed more time; shouldn't this stay open a tad longer? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:11 23 Nov 2014
FA's don't go to VFD; that is a long standing policy. This matter can be discussed in a forum if required. I would vote to keep this one regardless as evidently lots of people found it funny at one point. --ChiefjusticePSX 11:39, November 24, 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects