Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Polytechnic University of Bucharest)
m ({{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}})
 
(7,642 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Never-Ending Story}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=08:19, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Image-free randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never compose while on drugs. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:42 10-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Felt like it would never end. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=20:55, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
== [[Talk:Pizza Planet]] ==
+
|delnumber=4
{{Votervfd|time=08:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>20:55 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The only salvageable parts were the intro and what it is made of, but that's not enough to justify keeping the whole thing. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:20, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{U|MTTB}} blanked this page, and I tend to agree with him. If it weren't for the age of it I'd add it to QVFD, but it has floated around long enough that it should be VFD'd. It's not a comment or discussion on the article, but an attempt to write the article in the talk space. NRV. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|08:58 05 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} We tend to let people say a lot of things about the article on the discussion page, but this is not discussion about the article at all; it is a submission. And NRV is right. Delete the talk page only. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:04 5-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} I don't like using VFD to remove talk page clutter in principle, but I have better things to do than argue policy. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 21:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Per conversation elsewhere - this is an entry for the talk page only. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|09:31 05 Feb}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Al Obama]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=18:21, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=22:08, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} 2010 author {{U|Weri long wang}} writes the opposite of the plot of ''Atlas Shrugged,'' then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:08 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Title good but following article crap. I will take a bold punt and suggest the writer has never read any Marx. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:38, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} This is a copy of [[Alabama]] where author has transliterated every "Alabama" into "Al Obama". That is, if this pun occurs to you, you can type it into Uncyclopedia and see the pun in a real article. But you have already finished laughing, haven't you? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:21 3-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 20:48, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#If these things didn't take so much time I'd vote delete on most of them. [[user:Aleister|'''Al''']] 22:40 3-2-'13
 
#{{Delete}} Redundant redundancy. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:42, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Folk Force]] ==
+
== {{VFDc|Latte}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDg|time=18:03, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*<s>{{Delete}} Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>18:03 26-Jun-15</small></s>
  +
*<s>{{Delete}} Should have called it Frappe. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)</s>
  +
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
#It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} worse than [[Strings McPickens]] and many of its satellite articles that have already been deleted. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:05, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep|Keep (formerly Delete).}} Save by {{U|EStop}}. The above vote is a rant about our editing guidelines rather than a vote on the article. However, before the recent edits, the article was horrible, and listiness was the reason. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:47 4-Jul-15</small>
#{{Delete}} I have become convinced of the non-notability of the Folk Force. This piece of Anon's personal fiction arc almost enters the genre of Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:10 5-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Keep|Keep (formerly Delete).}} Still working through it, but it ought to be saved as Latte should be in the Uncyclopedia--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 18:29, July 4, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Where has this been hiding? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Strings McPickens]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Who Do You Think}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} leader of the folk force. This article isn't as bad as the typical folk force article, but there isn't really a point to it either. If there was one article in the series that might not be bad enough to delete, this is probably it. However, I also dislike crappy orphaned articles hanging in space. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:02, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I have been avoiding these votes because I don't know anything about the Folk Force. Surprise! neither does Wikipedia; nor about Strings McPickens. On this one, three paragraphs and one photo have been added since Anon created the page seven years ago. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:05 5-Feb-13</small>
+
#No redeeming value as far as I can tell {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Truly abandoned and orphaned. Now time to go. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:20 28-Jun-15</small>
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Baffling gibberish. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
}}
 
 
== [[The Botanist]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} an article about an enemy of the folk force. He was a botanist, then an eco-terrorist, then a catholic priest, then a eco-terrorist half-plant monster, then went to south America and was defeated by the folk force. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:54, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Oddball piece of fiction about a non-notable bad guy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:08 5-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:52, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=03:35, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Paragraphs are short, generic slaps at the institution that will amuse no one other than the author. Cruft from 2006, substantially unchanged since then. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:52 1-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>03:35 30-Jun-15</small>
#{{delete}} typical town-cruft. Half generic and half about stuff that only some who went to that college would get. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:43, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Sexist and unfunny. Finishes off with a crappy list. No redeeming qualities. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:24, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:01, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Never funny in a million years. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:31, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Scooter]]==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get a boner}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=23:04, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=02:56, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Long winded and crufty. Fanboyish. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 31 Jan}}
+
#{{Delete}} No humor except the glee of writing to strangers about sex. It is a chore maintaining the 2012 page of {{U|SecondChanceForMe}} against continual vandalism. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:56 5-Jul-15</small>
|comments=
 
*German bandcruft, accumulating cruft as an open guestbook would. Am abstaining because I don't know the band; there could be some good stuff for someone who does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 1-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Smoky Harry]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This article is about tobacco incarnate having a chance encounter with the [[Folk Force]]. This one is "about" something, but that something is itself randumbo. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:06, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} What is amaing [sic] is that a typo in the tiny Intro has not been caught in seven years. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:15 1-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Yikes. This is worse than bindweed. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 23:00, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Moses Purple]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dissociative Identity Disorder}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This article is not that bad, but it has too much randumbo and forced association with the [[Folk Force]] to really be good. However, I wrote a similar article at [[Uncle Tom]] that I think says everything that was worth saying in this article, but better, with less randumbo, and with a pagename that someone might search for. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:34, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} (Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder, just so you all know.) To get the joke you have to visit the revision history, to see that the article was written largely by a single user who with every revision wrote about a different thing with a different style, sometimes reverting himself (and calling his own contributions vandalism). The idea wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that the reader has no clue what this is about, unless he randomly checks the page's history or talkpage. Also, none of the revisions are very well written, I find. Finally, (albeit it's of a minor concern compared to the rest), the disorder isn't portrayed particularly well. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} If you say it has to do with the Folk Force, then it has to do with something, although it doesn't seem to. It is a ramble by Anon from 2006. It only contains humor if mentioning stock racial stereotypes on the page is funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:41 31-Jan-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} WTF? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:33, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=*{{comment}} there is a version early in the edit history that is "about" the folk force, but is even worse than the stock racial stereotypes. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:57, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
== [[Polytechnic University of Bucharest]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:36, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete|Abandon all hope, ye who enter here!}} Has nothing original or funny to say about the institution before it descends into lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:36 28-Jan-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} this would be towncruft if the randumbo were taken out of it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 15:21, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{delete}} Beyond the question “Why do men have nipples?” it's schoolcruft. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:16 05 Feb}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The page is protected, so I couldn't add {VFD}. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
 
== [[Harriet Tubman]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=05:32, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#{{keep}} Its about the subject, and probably the only way to make this article funny is to make it "racist," aka calling Tubman a property stealing terrorist. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:49, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
|comments=
 
* I'm adding this here based upon [{{fullurl:Talk:Harriet_Tubman|oldid=5642790}} this edit]. I'm not fussed one way or the other, so staying impartial, but adding this here to show the n00b how it's done. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|05:32 27 Jan}}
 
}}
 
 
== [[Unknown Jedi Council member]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:04, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#This one I will vote to save, and have done some fixes and a few additions. This page is like Funnybony's Womp Rats, a page about an unnamed Star Wars character who served on the Jedi council, a very important position earned by having control of the force, yes. And he is on the Star Wars template, so fans may look at the page in the near future. [[user:Aleister|'''Aleister''']] 21:06 26-1-'13
 
#{{Keep}} Per above, and below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:00 5-Feb-13</small>
 
|delnumber=0
 
|delete=
 
*<s>{{Delete}} Star Wars fan writes a page of dumbness about a subject he can't define and that no one will ever look up. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:04 26-Jan-13</small></s> '''Rescinded''' based on work by Aleister. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
 
*<s>{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:20, January 26, 2013 (UTC)</s> per fixing. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Renamed (capitalization) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:20 26-Jan-13</small>
 
* Based upon Al's working this survives, but it still reads like a “red shirt” biography. Which isn't a bad thing. One of the beauties of “Galaxy quest” movie was creating a character from a red shirt. So '''abstain erring on keep'''. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|06:53 02 Feb}}
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 22:38, July 5, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Never-Ending Story H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 614 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Image-free randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never compose while on drugs. Spıke Ѧ 11:42 10-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Felt like it would never end. --EStop (talk) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 337 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. The only salvageable parts were the intro and what it is made of, but that's not enough to justify keeping the whole thing. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:20, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 336 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Title good but following article crap. I will take a bold punt and suggest the writer has never read any Marx. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:38, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit 🔒 Latte H D Oldvfd Archive

Score: -2 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 220 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. Spıke Radiomicrophone18:03 26-Jun-15
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. Should have called it Frappe. --EStop (talk) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (3)
  1. It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep (formerly Delete). Save by EStop. The above vote is a rant about our editing guidelines rather than a vote on the article. However, before the recent edits, the article was horrible, and listiness was the reason. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:47 4-Jul-15
  3. Symbol keep vote Keep (formerly Delete). Still working through it, but it ought to be saved as Latte should be in the Uncyclopedia--EStop (talk) 18:29, July 4, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit Who Do You Think H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 176 hours
Delete (3)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 139 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sexist and unfunny. Finishes off with a crappy list. No redeeming qualities. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:24, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never funny in a million years. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:31, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Get a boner H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 19 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No humor except the glee of writing to strangers about sex. It is a chore maintaining the 2012 page of SecondChanceForMe against continual vandalism. Spıke Radiomicrophone02:56 5-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Dissociative Identity Disorder H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 3 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. (Dissociative Identity Disorder was previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder, just so you all know.) To get the joke you have to visit the revision history, to see that the article was written largely by a single user who with every revision wrote about a different thing with a different style, sometimes reverting himself (and calling his own contributions vandalism). The idea wouldn't be bad, except for the fact that the reader has no clue what this is about, unless he randomly checks the page's history or talkpage. Also, none of the revisions are very well written, I find. Finally, (albeit it's of a minor concern compared to the rest), the disorder isn't portrayed particularly well. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. WTF? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:33, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The page is protected, so I couldn't add {VFD}. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:40, July 5, 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects