Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Mr. Bucket; also to delete International Baccalaureate)
({{VFDn|MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎}})
 
(6,364 intermediate revisions by 91 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Rasta Jesus}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=00:37, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#Do we really need an article on this? There seems to be nothing useful here, no concept or anything. We have plenty of Jesii already. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929003735}}
  +
#{{Delete|"Shit (literal shit)."}} I have no problem with the existence of the article, as it can be found with the Jesii nav-template. But this article starts with a fanboy tone, stops for a moment at the assertion that non-separatism is racist (which now in the US, I find serious and unfunny), and ends in history-of-the-future and lists. Bottom line, after the useful concept of a Rastafarian Christ, authors have nothing they actually want to say about him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:43 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Precious little to do with anything. Like the pic though. I guess that came from elsewhere? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:28, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Mark Rutte}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:38, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
== [[Mr. Bucket]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=14:08, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Spotted by {{U|Llwy-ar-lawr}}. Imported from the Dutch Uncyclopedia last year as the only contribution of {{U|Burgerhallojan}}, seemingly translated by machine, poorly; minimal attempt to clean up and tons of red-links. Notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, but the reader will be straining too hard to read the "English" to laugh. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:38 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Yeah. That. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929004446}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
+
|comments=*Actually, Spike did see it, and [[User talk:Burgerhallojan|commented to its author]] about it, but, er... this sentence ought to have a sensible ending and I just can't think of one. Maybe this is a pointless comment and I should go back to sleep. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929004446}}
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Editors' take on this game is nothing but gays, feces, and even Jews. Unless you think any of these is an inherent laugh riot in the absence of cleverness, the solution is to start over. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:08 20-Jan-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[International Baccalaureate]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Trailer Park Boys}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:02, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=20:47, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} No redeeming qualities; the subject must have been funnier than this listcrufty report on it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:47 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Listing badly but take that away, there would be very little left. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:24, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{delete|Being really fucking awesome. Its a serious crime. Dont fuck with them.}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929223441}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#More gripe than informative in my view {{User:Romartus/sig2}}
 
#{{Delete}} See comments below; but you have my vote if you need it. I have never seen a list on Uncyclopedia with 603 items. My take on this would not be to air gripes from students forced to follow a curriculum, but to exaggerate local opposition that the curriculum is subversively left-wing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:08 20-Jan-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I think this article might be too young for VFD, unless we changed the rule that required articles under 7 days old to be tagged with {{tl|ICU}} rather than being taken to vfd. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:06, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:True; if the speculation is correct that this is an upload from the mirror site, QVFD is the solution. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:08 20-Jan-13</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Car manufacturers]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:38, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=15:51, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} User-optional code to render the names of Admins in bold in reports and diff pages is tedious to keep current, and there is no evidence that anyone uses it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:51 30-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Looks like we don't need this. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930161406}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} This is entirely listcruft; to-wit: contrived acronyms that spell out the names of car manufacturers. And, unbeknownst to I.P. Anon this morning, more doesn't mean better. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 19-Jan-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 16:07, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The main reason for highlighting admins that I know of is to make it easier to flag down active ones--hence the original code that highlighted them only in recent changes, which both sites have now done away with. Highlighting them anywhere else is excessive and obnoxious, IMHO. Since we've taken the approach of making bold admins an optional CSS thing, it seems likely to me that anyone who is experienced enough to know how to use it is also experienced enough to know the active admins' names by heart, or at least where to go to get their attention. That certainly applies to me; I know who has what rights here and I've never had any use for calling them out beyond a desire to make things flashier. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930161406}}<br>And besides, we already have a link to [[Uncyclopedia:Active Admins]] at the top of recent changes, in that grey box thingy, so even the original purpose of the bold names doesn't hold any water. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930163337}}
  +
*:One use for our code is that it highlights edits by Admins in a diff report or a page history, for the benefit of users who are hesitant to override Admins. Separately and again, what any other website does is not a factor here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:43 30-Sep-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 16:43, September 30, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Rasta Jesus H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 40 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Do we really need an article on this? There seems to be nothing useful here, no concept or anything. We have plenty of Jesii already. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:37 29 Sep 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote "Shit (literal shit)." I have no problem with the existence of the article, as it can be found with the Jesii nav-template. But this article starts with a fanboy tone, stops for a moment at the assertion that non-separatism is racist (which now in the US, I find serious and unfunny), and ends in history-of-the-future and lists. Bottom line, after the useful concept of a Rastafarian Christ, authors have nothing they actually want to say about him. Spıke ¬ 00:43 29-Sep-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Precious little to do with anything. Like the pic though. I guess that came from elsewhere? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:28, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Mark Rutte H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 40 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spotted by Llwy-ar-lawr. Imported from the Dutch Uncyclopedia last year as the only contribution of Burgerhallojan, seemingly translated by machine, poorly; minimal attempt to clean up and tons of red-links. Notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, but the reader will be straining too hard to read the "English" to laugh. Spıke ¬ 00:38 29-Sep-14
  2. Yeah. That. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:44 29 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Actually, Spike did see it, and commented to its author about it, but, er... this sentence ought to have a sensible ending and I just can't think of one. Maybe this is a pointless comment and I should go back to sleep. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:44 29 Sep 2014

edit Trailer Park Boys H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 19 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming qualities; the subject must have been funnier than this listcrufty report on it. Spıke ¬ 20:47 29-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listing badly but take that away, there would be very little left. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:24, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Being really fucking awesome. Its a serious crime. Dont fuck with them. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 22:34 29 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎ H T D Tag article

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 0 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. User-optional code to render the names of Admins in bold in reports and diff pages is tedious to keep current, and there is no evidence that anyone uses it. Spıke ¬ 15:51 30-Sep-14
  2. Looks like we don't need this. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:14 30 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The main reason for highlighting admins that I know of is to make it easier to flag down active ones--hence the original code that highlighted them only in recent changes, which both sites have now done away with. Highlighting them anywhere else is excessive and obnoxious, IMHO. Since we've taken the approach of making bold admins an optional CSS thing, it seems likely to me that anyone who is experienced enough to know how to use it is also experienced enough to know the active admins' names by heart, or at least where to go to get their attention. That certainly applies to me; I know who has what rights here and I've never had any use for calling them out beyond a desire to make things flashier. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:14 30 Sep 2014
    And besides, we already have a link to Uncyclopedia:Active Admins at the top of recent changes, in that grey box thingy, so even the original purpose of the bold names doesn't hold any water. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:33 30 Sep 2014
    One use for our code is that it highlights edits by Admins in a diff report or a page history, for the benefit of users who are hesitant to override Admins. Separately and again, what any other website does is not a factor here. Spıke ¬ 16:43 30-Sep-14
Personal tools
projects