Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(archiving)
({{VFDn|43}})
 
(6,097 intermediate revisions by 90 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Johnson County, Kansas}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=10:31, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:31 12-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Small town Kansas Kruft. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A very large amount of text that is also dull. ([[User talk:Moonhead42]]) 6:13, September 3rd, 2014
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
*I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:01 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
*There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004137}}
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Lahore}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDg|time=11:05, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:38 19-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Short and sucky. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830001738}}
  +
#{{Delete}} to short, not very funny, crude etc... --[[User:Moonhead42|Moonhead 42]] ([[User talk:Moonhead42|talk]]) 23:46, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
+
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Mudripper}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=10:56, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:56 29-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Does not jump the bar. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830015929}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Looks like disguised group vanity. I searched this term and it points back here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:39, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:Moonhead42|Moonhead 42]] ([[User talk:Moonhead42|talk]]) 23:51, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Slackware}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:55 30-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{delete|He invented what we call today, "water"}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831173146}}
  +
#{{delete}} Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
  +
== {{VFDn|Stanley Random Chess}} ==
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
{{VFDt|time=14:38, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
{{VFDarchive}}
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|Stanley Random Article.}} The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:38 2-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Confusing though somehow funny? Even so not funny enough to warrant the absurdity. [[User talk:Moonhead42]] 6:26, 3rd september.
  +
#Starts off badly and turns into an apparently serious article. The fact that it is a hoax does not suffice to make it acceptable. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140906225112}}
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
== {{VFDn|Hélio Castroneves}} ==
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
{{VFDt|time=17:19, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
|delnumber=4
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
|delete=
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
#{{Delete|I am crying because i have won a lot off money, and the government, is going to steal all of it! i got to make a run for it!}} It is that dumb throughout. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:19 3-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Hey, what happened to the sprites? They're AWOL again. (Oh yeah, and the article is bad.) {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140907025049}}
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:18, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Who? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 06:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
== {{VFDn|Brick}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:23, September 5, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} It is lists from start to end because it has no comedy strategy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:23 5-Sep-14</small>
  +
#I fixed the formatting a bit, but it didn't improve the article any. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140907134221}}
  +
#{{Delete}} It is just a list and it is not funny. [[User:TempSwampert11|TempSwampert11]] ([[User talk:TempSwampert11|talk]]) 23:38, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Nexon}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=11:32, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This poorly written article about an online gaming company has descended to ranting by unhappy customers. We do it better at, for example, [[Poptropica]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:32 8-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Hitler and nonsense numbers... not good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140909025412}}
  +
#{{Delete}} All the reasons above. [[User:TempSwampert11|TempSwampert11]] ([[User talk:TempSwampert11|talk]]) 23:41, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|43}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDg|time=02:35, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#This article is short and not especially funny, and it also lives on Illogicopedia where it fits much better. I put it here about a year and a half ago back when I didn't have much of an idea what I was doing. (I didn't write it, though; I only translated it from [[:fr:43|the French]].) I'd love to replace it with a much better version that Multiliteralist and I co-wrote on the fork, but I'm afraid he'd get angry if I did that since he hates this place and all. (Or rather, he hates Spike.) {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140909023516}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Two paragraphs, no photos, no theme except flouting the encyclopedia format. "Proof by mathematical induction" says that you could add ''n'' to all the numbers in the article and have an equally good one. No, an identical one. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:38 9-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} This article is short and not funny, which is why it should be deleted. [[User:TempSwampert11|TempSwampert11]] ([[User talk:TempSwampert11|talk]]) 23:53, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} For all the reasons above and below. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:41, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Short, stubby, lacks headers and images, looks incomplete. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:05, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*You could write your own version {{u|Llwy-ar-lawr}} in your user space and offer that up as a replacement for this article. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 06:42, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:Nah... I could, but it would undoubtedly be even worse than what's already there. There wouldn't just be nonsense numbers, there would be ''armies of nonsense numbers'' that banded together with manholes to shoot poison darts out of mind control towers to make us believe that--yeah, you get the picture. Besides, I've already written a replacement and I'd feel silly writing another one. I'll put that in my userspace and you can see what you think (or what you don't think). {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140909174438}}<br>[[User:Llwy-ar-lawr/43]]. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140909174651}}
  +
*::The conceptual problem remains even if the editorial problem is solved: No one looks up 43 in a "real encyclopedia," and if such a request is successful here, what are we doing without an article on [[58]], and so on? Also, if your collaborator would not want youse's article here, for whatever reason, it ought not be here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:10 15-Sep-14</small>
  +
*:::Yeah, that's true. I guess we don't need an article. I'm trying to get my stuff moved over, though, which is why I wanted to move this over too. Maybe I should ask Multi if he'd be ok with it being in mainspace; I don't actually know what he'd think. I just... argh. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140915211629}}
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Knights who say Ni}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=23:47, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A tribute to a Monty Python skit, with no value added by Uncyclopedians. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 10-Sep-14</small>
  +
#A rehashing of the events of the skit with some bits of randomness tacked on. More effort would be needed to make this any good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140911192105}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Sorta a bit funny but also not. --[[User:Moonhead42|Moonhead 42]] ([[User talk:Moonhead42|talk]]) 23:42, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 01:05, September 16, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Johnson County, Kansas H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 843 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. Spıke ¬ 10:31 12-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Small town Kansas Kruft. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very large amount of text that is also dull. (User talk:Moonhead42) 6:13, September 3rd, 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. Rocketsled (talk) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. Spıke ¬ 15:01 24-Aug-14
  • There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs paper sauce) 00:41 30 Aug 2014

edit Lahore H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 674 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. Spıke ¬ 11:38 19-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Short and sucky. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs dogs) 00:17 30 Aug 2014
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. to short, not very funny, crude etc... --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:46, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Mudripper H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 434 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. Spıke ¬ 10:56 29-Aug-14
  2. Does not jump the bar. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs muffins) 01:59 30 Aug 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Looks like disguised group vanity. I searched this term and it points back here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:39, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:51, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Slackware H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 398 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. Spıke ¬ 23:55 30-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote He invented what we call today, "water" -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 17:31 31 Aug 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Stanley Random Chess H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 335 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Stanley Random Article. The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. Spıke ¬ 14:38 2-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Confusing though somehow funny? Even so not funny enough to warrant the absurdity. User talk:Moonhead42 6:26, 3rd september.
  4. Starts off badly and turns into an apparently serious article. The fact that it is a hoax does not suffice to make it acceptable. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs dogs) 22:51 6 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hélio Castroneves H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 308 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote I am crying because i have won a lot off money, and the government, is going to steal all of it! i got to make a run for it! It is that dumb throughout. Spıke ¬ 17:19 3-Sep-14
  2. Hey, what happened to the sprites? They're AWOL again. (Oh yeah, and the article is bad.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs hot dogs) 02:50 7 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:18, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Who? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Brick H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 263 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is lists from start to end because it has no comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 14:23 5-Sep-14
  2. I fixed the formatting a bit, but it didn't improve the article any. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cats) 13:42 7 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is just a list and it is not funny. TempSwampert11 (talk) 23:38, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Nexon H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 194 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This poorly written article about an online gaming company has descended to ranting by unhappy customers. We do it better at, for example, Poptropica. Spıke ¬ 11:32 8-Sep-14
  2. Hitler and nonsense numbers... not good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cats) 02:54 9 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the reasons above. TempSwampert11 (talk) 23:41, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit 43 H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 179 hours
Delete (5)
  1. This article is short and not especially funny, and it also lives on Illogicopedia where it fits much better. I put it here about a year and a half ago back when I didn't have much of an idea what I was doing. (I didn't write it, though; I only translated it from the French.) I'd love to replace it with a much better version that Multiliteralist and I co-wrote on the fork, but I'm afraid he'd get angry if I did that since he hates this place and all. (Or rather, he hates Spike.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cats) 02:35 9 Sep 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Two paragraphs, no photos, no theme except flouting the encyclopedia format. "Proof by mathematical induction" says that you could add n to all the numbers in the article and have an equally good one. No, an identical one. Spıke ¬ 12:38 9-Sep-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article is short and not funny, which is why it should be deleted. TempSwampert11 (talk) 23:53, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. For all the reasons above and below. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:41, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stubby, lacks headers and images, looks incomplete. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 01:05, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • You could write your own version Llwy-ar-lawr in your user space and offer that up as a replacement for this article. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:42, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
    Nah... I could, but it would undoubtedly be even worse than what's already there. There wouldn't just be nonsense numbers, there would be armies of nonsense numbers that banded together with manholes to shoot poison darts out of mind control towers to make us believe that--yeah, you get the picture. Besides, I've already written a replacement and I'd feel silly writing another one. I'll put that in my userspace and you can see what you think (or what you don't think). -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs hot dogs) 17:44 9 Sep 2014
    User:Llwy-ar-lawr/43. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs dogs) 17:46 9 Sep 2014
    The conceptual problem remains even if the editorial problem is solved: No one looks up 43 in a "real encyclopedia," and if such a request is successful here, what are we doing without an article on 58, and so on? Also, if your collaborator would not want youse's article here, for whatever reason, it ought not be here. Spıke ¬ 00:10 15-Sep-14
    Yeah, that's true. I guess we don't need an article. I'm trying to get my stuff moved over, though, which is why I wanted to move this over too. Maybe I should ask Multi if he'd be ok with it being in mainspace; I don't actually know what he'd think. I just... argh. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs paper sauce) 21:16 15 Sep 2014

edit Knights who say Ni H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 134 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A tribute to a Monty Python skit, with no value added by Uncyclopedians. Spıke ¬ 23:47 10-Sep-14
  2. A rehashing of the events of the skit with some bits of randomness tacked on. More effort would be needed to make this any good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs paper sauce) 19:21 11 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sorta a bit funny but also not. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:42, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects