Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(archiving)
({{VFDn|Vietnamese}})
 
(6,988 intermediate revisions by 97 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Anarcho-fascism}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:20, November 13, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} It has it all: A tedious read without photos, hard to tell whether author is an ideologue or is ridiculing ideologues, had links to Facebook and YouTube apparently to hump an internet meme (until I deleted them), and is full of encyclopedia cliches. (Check out Section 2: "Other critics may have alleged....Many believe....It has been suggested....But clearly it is very likely possible...Legend has it..." Utterly not worth streamlining. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:20 13-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} The intro is supposed to lure the reader in to the rest of the article. Here, the intro is literally factual, and the rest of it I can't tell if it's trying to be funny or just as factual. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:25, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Incoherent. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 08:06, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Whatever. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141117171427}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Despite my warning, Llwy-ar-lawr has been trying to streamline this. But what you wind up with is an "ism" whose only humor is its impossibility — that is, the fact that it is a page no one will look up — unless you came here from Facebook etc. to see if there is an article on this offsite meme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:35 14-Nov-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDc|Crimethink}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDg|time=00:06, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|Foreign-language humor.}} This article is a study in writing a page in the style of the novel ''1984'' — but not in writing any original comedy. Intro also instructs other Uncyclopedians in the supposed proper use of the templates author created (and {{U|Anton199}} has revised). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:06 16-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Send it to Room 101. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:22, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#What's this, an attempt at summarising ''1984'' in Newspeak? I'm not seeing the humour. The only funny thing on this page, IMHO, is [[:File:Unbook.jpg]]. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141117172810}}
  +
*<s>{{Delete}} Reading this hurts my head. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 08:08, November 16, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} On second thought, it isn't that bad. You just have to get into it, and Anton is right. The better stuff comes later. Perhaps, it could use a thorough editing and some rewriting but not deletion. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 17:54, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:The article is unreadable. It's the same as the Pig Latin article that was on VFD just a while back - the humour is just the fact that it's unreadable. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 10:24, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#::Oh? I can read it. If the problem is that you can't read it, I could provide a translated version as I did before. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141118144602}}
  +
#:::The problem is not that the obstacle is insurmountable. The problem is that the article is all about its own obstacle. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:29 18-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Keep}} Political/social parody/satire is also funny. I think whomever wrote it did a very good job. It's along the lines of the [[Captain's Log]] article which is clearly derived and emulating a specific source but does definitely appeal to those who enjoy that source. [[User:Begege|Begege]] ([[User talk:Begege|talk]]) 04:37, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
*It's pretty funny at some points. Just read it for long enough. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:48, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
}}
   
  +
== {{VFDn|About}} ==
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
{{VFDt|time=20:26, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
{{VFDarchive}}
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
# {{Delete}} Seriously? Spouting random gibberish isn't humour. {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 20:26, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A lot of word-association, sometimes descending into numb lists, with no theme holding it together. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:30 17-Nov-14</small>
  +
#Was there a point here? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141118014318}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Pretty stupid. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 04:59, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*'Numb lists'? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141118014318}}
  +
*:Numb, without feeling, without a sense of what anything is doing there. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:53 18-Nov-14</small>
  +
}}
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
== {{VFDn|Vietnamese}} ==
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
{{VFDt|time=17:42, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
|delnumber=3
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
|delete=
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
#{{Delete}} A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --[[User:Precious Star|Precious Star]] ([[User talk:Precious Star|talk]]) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:05 20-Nov-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 19:39, November 20, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Llwy-ar-lawr • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Anarcho-fascism H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 166 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. It has it all: A tedious read without photos, hard to tell whether author is an ideologue or is ridiculing ideologues, had links to Facebook and YouTube apparently to hump an internet meme (until I deleted them), and is full of encyclopedia cliches. (Check out Section 2: "Other critics may have alleged....Many believe....It has been suggested....But clearly it is very likely possible...Legend has it..." Utterly not worth streamlining. Spıke ¬ 21:20 13-Nov-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro is supposed to lure the reader in to the rest of the article. Here, the intro is literally factual, and the rest of it I can't tell if it's trying to be funny or just as factual. ConCass2 (talk) 09:25, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Incoherent. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 08:06, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Whatever. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:14 17 Nov 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Despite my warning, Llwy-ar-lawr has been trying to streamline this. But what you wind up with is an "ism" whose only humor is its impossibility — that is, the fact that it is a page no one will look up — unless you came here from Facebook etc. to see if there is an article on this offsite meme. Spıke ¬ 17:35 14-Nov-14

edit 🔒 Crimethink H T D Oldvfd Archive

Score: 1 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 115 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Foreign-language humor. This article is a study in writing a page in the style of the novel 1984 — but not in writing any original comedy. Intro also instructs other Uncyclopedians in the supposed proper use of the templates author created (and Anton199 has revised). Spıke ¬ 00:06 16-Nov-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Send it to Room 101. ConCass2 (talk) 09:22, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
  3. What's this, an attempt at summarising 1984 in Newspeak? I'm not seeing the humour. The only funny thing on this page, IMHO, is File:Unbook.jpg. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:28 17 Nov 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. On second thought, it isn't that bad. You just have to get into it, and Anton is right. The better stuff comes later. Perhaps, it could use a thorough editing and some rewriting but not deletion. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:54, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    The article is unreadable. It's the same as the Pig Latin article that was on VFD just a while back - the humour is just the fact that it's unreadable. ConCass2 (talk) 10:24, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh? I can read it. If the problem is that you can't read it, I could provide a translated version as I did before. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 14:46 18 Nov 2014
    The problem is not that the obstacle is insurmountable. The problem is that the article is all about its own obstacle. Spıke ¬ 15:29 18-Nov-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Political/social parody/satire is also funny. I think whomever wrote it did a very good job. It's along the lines of the Captain's Log article which is clearly derived and emulating a specific source but does definitely appeal to those who enjoy that source. Begege (talk) 04:37, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • It's pretty funny at some points. Just read it for long enough. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:48, November 16, 2014 (UTC)

edit About H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 71 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seriously? Spouting random gibberish isn't humour. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 20:26, November 17, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of word-association, sometimes descending into numb lists, with no theme holding it together. Spıke ¬ 20:30 17-Nov-14
  3. Was there a point here? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:43 18 Nov 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty stupid. --Pwn head Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 04:59, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • 'Numb lists'? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:43 18 Nov 2014
    Numb, without feeling, without a sense of what anything is doing there. Spıke ¬ 01:53 18-Nov-14

edit Vietnamese H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A bunch of pornographic content and a few sentences about how the Chinese are better than the Vietnamese. --Precious Star (talk) 17:44, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not an "encyclopedia article" but a pictorial essay, to make the unfunny assertion that the Vietnamese are whores. Spıke ¬ 18:05 20-Nov-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Words cannot describe just how terrible this article is. So, it's pretty bad. ConCass2 (talk) 19:39, November 20, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects