Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(lol)
({{VFDn|Nunavut}})
 
(6,297 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Johnson County, Kansas}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=10:31, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:31 12-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Small town Kansas Kruft. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
*I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:01 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Office etiquette}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=03:02, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that '''this is a humor wiki'''. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:02 13-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} One liners. Not good.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
+
|comments=
  +
*Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:58 17-Aug-14</small>
  +
:I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Johnny Gay}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=01:45, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:45 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not very funny and not notable enough. <s>I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1ylkdldauc this YouTube video].</s> {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#::But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:08 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Thanks for the meme-ory. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Lahore}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=11:05, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:38 19-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|Nunavut}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=00:26, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=4
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Deliberately stupid articles are, well, stupid. And not entertaining. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:26 20-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} It's a pretty original idea for a theme (it's written like an essay) but it's executed awfully, and the end result is little humour. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 08:15, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} First-person stream-of-consciousness unfunny drivel. [[User:Captain gull|Captain gull]] ([[User talk:Captain gull|talk]]) 01:09, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} To make it stay it needs to improve but do we have any contributors that know this place??--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:57, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*It actually improves near the end after the earlier nonsense. Don't know whether to see if go or not. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:37, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I gave it another re-read, to the end, and I don't see it. Less navelism there but still nothing but Beavis-and-Butthead "humor." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:15 22-Aug-14</small>
  +
*[{{fullurl:Nunavut|oldid=3844875}} This] is an older version that predates the current 'bored teenager essay'. See what you think? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140829042712}}
  +
}}
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
== {{VFDn|Dolphin uprising}} ==
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
{{VFDt|time=13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see [[Emu War]] and [[Animals with feet war with animals with no feet]]. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of {{U|Sunoco}} is a waste of time, except to key us to [[:Category:Silly wars]], where other VFD fodder may be found. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 25-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Silly wars? We don't need no silly wars. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 03:33, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*New Uncyclopedian {{U|SamTheAwesome}} has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new [[The Great Whale Invasion]] (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:08 21-Aug-14</small>
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|United Socialist States of America}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=22:21, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:21 21-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not horrible but too far from the truth to be funny, IMHO. Just kind of dull, really. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 23:29, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#ConCass2 made it a bit better, but it's still not great. Sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 02:47, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:14 25-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Keep}} {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
*{{Comment}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_in_the_USSA], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*::Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:12 22-Aug-14</small>
  +
*I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Brian Cowen}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since {{U|Dwight K Shrute}} finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:45 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Cutters}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=23:43, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Disturbing, in a not-funny way. Also simply not funny {{User:Sannse/Sig}} 23:43, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#<s>{{Delete}} Quickly! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 23:57, August 25, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
#{{Delete}} This is a difficult topic to make funny to begin with, and it is a clearly failed attempt. No surprise. [[User:Phrank Psinatra|Phrank Psinatra]] ([[User talk:Phrank Psinatra|Talk]]) 04:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete|Shit.}} [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 13:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#<s>{{Delete}} and redirect to [[Emo]]. [[User:Captain gull|Captain gull]] ([[User talk:Captain gull|talk]]) 00:59, August 27, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
#{{Kill}} Not funny, put it in the landfill. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 13:08, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=5
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{KEEP}} I don't think this is that bad, I would possible remove the slightly graphic picture, but other than that I think it's fine --{{User:Steveyt0/sig}} 03:05, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Keep}} The Intro and one of the illustrations is downright creepy — and previews some individual horror writing that has no comedy hook at all. The old version (see '''Comments''') is better, but the current initial illustration is better. Will merge. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 27-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Spike made it better. I like the line about Emo Hitler's dog ignoring him because usually it's the dog trying to get the human's attention. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 00:28, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Keep}} I admit it's keep-worthy now. {{User:Captain gull/Sig}} 05:10, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Keep}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=*[{{fullurl:Cutters|oldid=1309905}} This] is the last version that was entirely the [[User:Pocketthesaurus|original author]]'s work, and it may be better than the current one. Or it may not. I'm not that fond of either, but I thought I should drop this here anyway as I think the large number of mostly IP edits has not done any good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 04:07, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
**I think that one is better, but I still see it as a pretty straight write-up of what people think about cutting, rather than a humorous twist on it. Hav a look at the second paragraph of the section headed "A few simple ways to avoid cutting", maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see a single joke in there. Much of the rest is the same -- {{User:Sannse/Sig}} 21:43, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
**:Again, I've merged the various versions; be sure you are evaluating the current ("our best" version). A piece of the text you highlight (now a separate bullet), about tension build-up in younger teens (linked to [[Emo]]) is too subtle and I just cut it out. But I do see jokes in there, mostly the "humor of repetition" — especially when the author repeats "compulsive behaviours." It does read like a spork of a serious treatise, with not our best comedy applied to it, but not deleteworthy. Ridiculing various neuroses is fair game. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:59 27-Aug-14</small>
  +
*** I'll admit it's better, although I can't say I laughed (sorry Spike), and can't bring myself to change my vote -- {{User:Sannse/Sig}} 17:26, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*I have no opinion, but I want to demonstrate that I am showing an interest. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:33 pm 28 Aug 2014}}
  +
*Well done, but the intro should still be rewritten in my opinion. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 20:50, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:Gave the Intro another touch-up; not saying it couldn't use more. Anyone who thinks this is deletable after my illustration-and-template pass may simply want to have a wiki with taboo subjects. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:15 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
*:: You mean "without", dear. And we (almost) all have our areas where the balance of humor to distaste goes steeply in one direction or the other. I say "almost" because I miss EMC, but that's another level of distaste. Either way, I accept it's staying (the article, not EMC) -- {{User:Sannse/Sig}} 23:33, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Dan Kwanzaa}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=09:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#I don't know what this article talks about, but I have arbitrarily decided - {{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A copycat article of [[Dan Kwon]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Contrary to popular belief, repetition of such jokes does not make them better; they just get stale, and often mouldy. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 17:55, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Considering this article only consists of 19 words it would have to be 19 very good words to be worthy of keeping. Needless to say, it is not --{{User:Steveyt0/sig}} 00:43, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|The Only Emo Holiday: National Emo Day}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=09:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Where is the humor? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A pointless article about a nonexistent thing; possibly written to ridicule but not to amuse. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:08 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
#The spelling leaves much to be desired, and the humour isn't much better. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 21:53, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} No sense in trying to improve this one. {{User:Captain gull/Sig}} 23:09, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*I voted on the wrong article, thats why I deleted what I said. I moved it to the correct place --{{User:Steveyt0/sig}} 00:41, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|UnPoetia:Peter Lorre is a Zombie}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=09:54, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Anon tries to make an article about Peter Lorre, but creates a poem instead. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:54, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} King of the website memes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:10 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Has no concept except that Peter Lorre is a fearsome zombie, and does nothing remotely funny with it. Mentions Chuck Norris, Mr. T and Oscar Wilde in the same breath in a failed attempt to make up for the lack of humour -- and, to add insult to injury (or the other way round), doesn't even have a proper rhyming structure. '''Feed it to the zombies'''. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 21:33, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Scary vote}} What Anton and Llwy both said above, and it is a very bad, tasteless article that has barely been edited since 2010. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 22:02, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I know poetry is meant to be subjective but the clincher is that this didn't start out as poetry. {{User:Captain gull/Sig}} 22:52, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 04:27, August 29, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Johnson County, Kansas H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 401 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. Spıke ¬ 10:31 12-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Small town Kansas Kruft. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. Rocketsled (talk) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. Spıke ¬ 15:01 24-Aug-14

edit Office etiquette H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 385 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that this is a humor wiki. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 03:02 13-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. ConCass2 (talk) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. One liners. Not good.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. Rocketsled (talk) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. Spıke ¬ 11:58 17-Aug-14
I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. ConCass2 (talk) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)

edit Johnny Gay H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 266 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. Spıke ¬ 01:45 18-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not very funny and not notable enough. I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to this YouTube video. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. Spıke ¬ 14:08 18-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Thanks for the meme-ory. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Lahore H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 233 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. Spıke ¬ 11:38 19-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Nunavut H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 220 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Deliberately stupid articles are, well, stupid. And not entertaining. Spıke ¬ 00:26 20-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's a pretty original idea for a theme (it's written like an essay) but it's executed awfully, and the end result is little humour. ConCass2 (talk) 08:15, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. First-person stream-of-consciousness unfunny drivel. Captain gull (talk) 01:09, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. To make it stay it needs to improve but do we have any contributors that know this place??--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:57, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It actually improves near the end after the earlier nonsense. Don't know whether to see if go or not. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:37, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I gave it another re-read, to the end, and I don't see it. Less navelism there but still nothing but Beavis-and-Butthead "humor." Spıke ¬ 13:15 22-Aug-14
  • This is an older version that predates the current 'bored teenager essay'. See what you think? -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 04:27, 29 Aug 2014

edit Dolphin uprising H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 183 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see Emu War and Animals with feet war with animals with no feet. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of Sunoco is a waste of time, except to key us to Category:Silly wars, where other VFD fodder may be found. Spıke ¬ 12:09 25-Aug-14
  3. Silly wars? We don't need no silly wars. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 03:33, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • New Uncyclopedian SamTheAwesome has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new The Great Whale Invasion (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. Spıke ¬ 13:08 21-Aug-14

edit United Socialist States of America H T D Survivor

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 174 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. Spıke ¬ 22:21 21-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not horrible but too far from the truth to be funny, IMHO. Just kind of dull, really. Snarglefoop (talk) 23:29, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ConCass2 made it a bit better, but it's still not great. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 02:47, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. ConCass2 (talk) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
    One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) Spıke ¬ 12:14 25-Aug-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. [1], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. Spıke ¬ 13:12 22-Aug-14
  • I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. ConCass2 (talk) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

edit Brian Cowen H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 103 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. ConCass2 (talk) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since Dwight K Shrute finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. Spıke ¬ 21:45 24-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Cutters H D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 76 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Disturbing, in a not-funny way. Also simply not funny sannse@Wikia (talk) 23:43, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Quickly! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 23:57, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a difficult topic to make funny to begin with, and it is a clearly failed attempt. No surprise. Phrank Psinatra (Talk) 04:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Shit. ConCass2 (talk) 13:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. and redirect to Emo. Captain gull (talk) 00:59, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Symbol kill vote Kill. Not funny, put it in the landfill. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:08, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (5)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I don't think this is that bad, I would possible remove the slightly graphic picture, but other than that I think it's fine --Steveyt0 (talk) 03:05, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The Intro and one of the illustrations is downright creepy — and previews some individual horror writing that has no comedy hook at all. The old version (see Comments) is better, but the current initial illustration is better. Will merge. Spıke ¬ 13:38 27-Aug-14
  3. Spike made it better. I like the line about Emo Hitler's dog ignoring him because usually it's the dog trying to get the human's attention. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:28, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol keep vote Keep. I admit it's keep-worthy now. Capt. Gull (talk) 05:10, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol keep vote Keep. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • This is the last version that was entirely the original author's work, and it may be better than the current one. Or it may not. I'm not that fond of either, but I thought I should drop this here anyway as I think the large number of mostly IP edits has not done any good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 04:07, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
    • I think that one is better, but I still see it as a pretty straight write-up of what people think about cutting, rather than a humorous twist on it. Hav a look at the second paragraph of the section headed "A few simple ways to avoid cutting", maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see a single joke in there. Much of the rest is the same -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 21:43, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
      Again, I've merged the various versions; be sure you are evaluating the current ("our best" version). A piece of the text you highlight (now a separate bullet), about tension build-up in younger teens (linked to Emo) is too subtle and I just cut it out. But I do see jokes in there, mostly the "humor of repetition" — especially when the author repeats "compulsive behaviours." It does read like a spork of a serious treatise, with not our best comedy applied to it, but not deleteworthy. Ridiculing various neuroses is fair game. Spıke ¬ 21:59 27-Aug-14
      • I'll admit it's better, although I can't say I laughed (sorry Spike), and can't bring myself to change my vote -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 17:26, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  • I have no opinion, but I want to demonstrate that I am showing an interest.                               Puppy's talk page02:33 pm 28 Aug 2014
  • Well done, but the intro should still be rewritten in my opinion. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 20:50, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
    Gave the Intro another touch-up; not saying it couldn't use more. Anyone who thinks this is deletable after my illustration-and-template pass may simply want to have a wiki with taboo subjects. Spıke ¬ 22:15 28-Aug-14
    You mean "without", dear. And we (almost) all have our areas where the balance of humor to distaste goes steeply in one direction or the other. I say "almost" because I miss EMC, but that's another level of distaste. Either way, I accept it's staying (the article, not EMC) -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 23:33, August 28, 2014 (UTC)

edit Dan Kwanzaa H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 18 hours
Delete (4)
  1. I don't know what this article talks about, but I have arbitrarily decided - Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A copycat article of Dan Kwon. Spıke ¬ 12:12 28-Aug-14
  3. Contrary to popular belief, repetition of such jokes does not make them better; they just get stale, and often mouldy. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 17:55, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Considering this article only consists of 19 words it would have to be 19 very good words to be worthy of keeping. Needless to say, it is not --Steveyt0 (talk) 00:43, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit The Only Emo Holiday: National Emo Day H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 18 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Where is the humor? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A pointless article about a nonexistent thing; possibly written to ridicule but not to amuse. Spıke ¬ 12:08 28-Aug-14
  3. The spelling leaves much to be desired, and the humour isn't much better. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 21:53, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. No sense in trying to improve this one. Capt. Gull (talk) 23:09, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I voted on the wrong article, thats why I deleted what I said. I moved it to the correct place --Steveyt0 (talk) 00:41, August 29, 2014 (UTC)

edit UnPoetia:Peter Lorre is a Zombie H D

Score: 5
Elapsed Time: 18 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon tries to make an article about Peter Lorre, but creates a poem instead. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:54, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. King of the website memes. Spıke ¬ 12:10 28-Aug-14
  3. Has no concept except that Peter Lorre is a fearsome zombie, and does nothing remotely funny with it. Mentions Chuck Norris, Mr. T and Oscar Wilde in the same breath in a failed attempt to make up for the lack of humour -- and, to add insult to injury (or the other way round), doesn't even have a proper rhyming structure. Feed it to the zombies. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 21:33, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Scared face It's so bad it's scary. What Anton and Llwy both said above, and it is a very bad, tasteless article that has barely been edited since 2010. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:02, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I know poetry is meant to be subjective but the clincher is that this didn't start out as poetry. Capt. Gull (talk) 22:52, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Personal tools
projects