Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDc|Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit}})
({{VFDn|Nexon}})
 
(6,460 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Johnson County, Kansas}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=10:31, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:31 12-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Small town Kansas Kruft. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A very large amount of text that is also dull. ([[User talk:Moonhead42]]) 6:13, September 3rd, 2014
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:01 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
*There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004137}}
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Mudripper}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=10:56, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
==[[Hermann Goering]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:57, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} A real article about a real person. Much better than the other one we used to have (see '''Comments'''), uses decent writing style, even has a comedy strategy (politely soft-pedaling genocide, and later implying that Goering himself might have edited the article). Not delete-worthy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:04 11-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{keep}} Best line in the article: "often spelled Goering due to wartime shortages of umlauted characters" {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 18:56, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} --{{User:Hotadmin4u69/sig}}<small><font color="#2B547E">21:08</font><font color="#387C44"> Nov 13 </font><font color="#2B547E"> 2012</font></small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not funny at all...--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 13:57, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:56 29-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Does not jump the bar. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830015929}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Looks like disguised group vanity. I searched this term and it points back here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:39, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:Moonhead42|Moonhead 42]] ([[User talk:Moonhead42|talk]]) 23:51, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*We deleted the other one; see [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive268#H.W. Goering]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:59 11-Nov-12</small>
 
*'''Page moved.''' The page used to be named "Hermann Goering (politician)"; the current name was a disambiguation page to here and to the other article that we deleted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:09 11-Nov-12</small> PS--I changed "Hermann Goering (politician)" to a redirect but it is now deleted via QVFD. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:58 15-Nov-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Making up Oscar Wilde Quotes]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Slackware}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:21, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=4
#{{Keep}} I still get a laugh when I'm having a bad day when I get on here and look at this article. Personally, I think it should just be kept for how it can brighten any day, except Oscar Wilde's. [[User:ResurrectedSage|RS]] ([[User talk:ResurrectedSage|talk]]) 22:13, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''KEEP''' There's just no point in deleting this. {{User:Matt lobster/sig}} 22:36, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{keep}}--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 02:58, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It's just a mostly-sexual list of crap not really about Oscar Wilde. I've already had my run in with sexually crude things not being funny and I find this to be no different. When it's not sexual, it's "Your Mom" and similar jokes of immature level. --LuMontyZ Was Here 19:21, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
#:I have a similar problem with gratuitous potty humor. However, Oscar Wilde is not only Uncyclopedia's Patron Meme but a gay pervert, and thus the perfect Wildeism is gratuitous potty humor that is not really about Oscar Wilde. In fact, Wildeisms that don't have some sort of double meaning ought to be eliminated. I'm holding off voting; don't remember the details, but I seem to recall that all the site's Wildeisms are cross-linked; I got VFD's approval two years ago to delete some component of this and found I had to undo my work. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:35 10-Nov-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:55 30-Aug-14</small>
#{{delete}} Unnecessary, we have [[Uncyclopedia:Wilde]]. {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 22:19, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{delete|He invented what we call today, "water"}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831173146}}
  +
#{{delete}} Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Don't know how nominator got this nomination to be born with an age of 5 hours (probably cut-and-pasting the timestamp) but I've set it to the timestamp of his signature. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:35 10-Nov-12</small>
+
* And on 17 July 2007 an IP made a single edit, which was to spam an ad for Slackware into the article in a new section titled 'usage'. It sticks out like a sore thumb if you read that far. Apparently nobody noticed (maybe nobody's ever read that far in the article), since the section is still there, still just as serious and non-funny as it was the day it was plopped into the article. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 19:32, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
*Sorry about the timestamp deal. I just copied the template like the instructions said. Thanks for fixing it. I guess my beef with this article is that because it's "The Patron meme" it's fine, but my former article that revolved around Fire Emblem, shipping, and crude jokes about the shipping was delete after vote because it was "too crude." I just want some consistency here. LuMontyZ Was Here 17:40, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
+
*:I just read it, it isn't clear to me it's an ad, nor that it's unfunny, nor why it is funny if it is meant to be funny. A fifth Delete vote and no one has to answer this question. But you are free to try to improve an article while it is being voted on. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:51 16-Sep-14</small>
*:Consistency? Dream on! {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:42 11-Nov-12</small>
+
*::Eh hmmm.... I just re-read it, and I think I was wrong -- that section is 'way too over the top to be a serious ad for Slackware. Microsoft uses it internally, and the Debian project uses it for their servers -- yeah right. And out here in the real world, the shuttle <s>uses</s> used IBM software, and IBM has its own version of Unix. So, I guess the author of that section took ''me'' in, at least. (And I'm still undecided on whether the article is salvageable which is why I voted neither yay nor nay.) [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 20:03, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
*:Seriously, I try to show consistency (because it makes me more persuasive and proves that a Delete vote is not personal) but it is not required. Voters on VFD are voters, not paper-graders, and are allowed to vote any way for any reason; if they have criteria, they are allowed to have as many exceptions and special cases as to seem that there are no principles at all--though, again, that is less persuasive than consistency. Voters above all are not required to have the '''same''' criteria for what should stay and what should go. You ought not nominate something on VFD as real or perceived retaliation for the deletion of an article of yours. In addition, "too crude" might not mean vulgarity or sexual references; it might mean crude typography or facile humor, such as puns on people's names. It's conventional here to include [[User:SPIKE|links]] to what you are talking about so we can see for ourselves and perhaps give you more relevant advice. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:01 12-Nov-12</small>
 
*I get what you mean completely. It isn't personal. In fact, if I knew that this page was the Patron Meme of this site I wouldn't have bothered. I suppose as an aspiring math teacher I've been trying to grade papers. I hope I didn't come across as petty or angry. This is the article[[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:LuMontyZ/Fire_Emblem:_Abridged]] specifically the version before today's edit. I appreciate any feedback. LuMontyZ 04:16, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:No need to feel that you shouldn't have VFD'ed the article. Any article, no matter how hallowed, shouldn't be allowed to stick around if it is a tedious mess, like this one. Somebody should reach in there and kick just about 90% of these "quotes" out on their sorry asses, for being devoid of humor.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121113163510}}
 
*::It was I who nominated that article of yours for deletion (see [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive265#Fire_Emblem:_Abridged|archive 265]]) and I have now given you a detailed review on your user page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:05 14-Nov-12</small>
 
*I'm glad someone agrees! I'm not sorry, it's just the feeling when you find out how, to use your word BizzeeBeever, hallowed something is. Then comes the feeling that says it's untouchable. <i>Lu</i> 00:15, November 14, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[English Class]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Stanley Random Chess}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:18, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDg|time=14:38, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|Stanley Random Article.}} The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:38 2-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Confusing though somehow funny? Even so not funny enough to warrant the absurdity. [[User talk:Moonhead42]] 6:26, 3rd september.
  +
#Starts off badly and turns into an apparently serious article. The fact that it is a hoax does not suffice to make it acceptable. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140906225112}}
  +
#{{Delete}} This is ripped off from an article at ChessVariants.org, much of it copied word for word. That, and it's not especially funny. (I suppose it was originally inspired by Fischer Random Chess, which is a real game.) [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 22:20, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#Ehhh. I get the "joke" here, and it isn't funny.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121108161835}}
 
#{{Delete}} I didn't even get that far. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:33 8-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Delete|English sucks.}} {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig|17:31|10|November|2012}}
 
#{{Delete}} What else??--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 23:03, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Basingstoke]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Hélio Castroneves}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:36, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDg|time=17:19, September 3, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=5
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|I am crying because i have won a lot off money, and the government, is going to steal all of it! i got to make a run for it!}} It is that dumb throughout. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:19 3-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Hey, what happened to the sprites? They're AWOL again. (Oh yeah, and the article is bad.) {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140907025049}}
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:18, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Who? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 06:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Ugh. Bad. Cross between total incoherence and an attack article. (BTW the Wikipedia article on him has some entertaining bits, including, "an Internal Revenue Service agent testified that Castroneves owed U.S. taxes on the full $5 million from Penske even though he had never actually received the money". Man that's the IRS alright.) [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 20:38, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
# We get it. <Your_city_here/> is a horrible, horrible nightmare of a place, filled with chavs, drunken chavs, drunken chavs having sex, drunken chavs having drunken ''gay'' sex, [[OVER 9000|several]] traffic circles, and (for a bit of variety) ...some chavs. If you don't like your town/city/state/province/country, please feel free to die or move away. ''Just take your shitty article with you.'' {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104163628}}
 
# Delete as '''Vanity'''. Besides, why is this located at "Basingstoke" and not "Basingrad"? {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 18:52, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Because Basingstoke is the name of a city and thus a valid name for an encyclopedia article; whereas Basingrad is the punch line of a joke (a trite joke, styling a place after the Soviet Union), which no one is going to type. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:32 4-Nov-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Abstain}} All of the humor is trite and none of it is clever. But I would not see, in our campaign against chavcruft, a new, large hole open up at Basingstoke, a few miles away from the gaping hole at Reading, where we have no article (not even for that [[Pennsylvania|other]] Reading in that other Berkshire that is pronounced the way it's written) and people mentioning snooker tournaments have to use a link to book-[[Reading]]. We are laying waste to the English countryside. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 4-Nov-12</small>
 
*I have been to Basingstoke so I will have to abstain in case that visit left me biased in either direction. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 22:09, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Then you ought not just abstain but '''repair'''. I was driven through Basingstoke once on my way to work in [[Reading]]. It had an ICL plant and a cinema. Slough, now that (phew!) deserves a replacement article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:06 12-Nov-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Bear in the Big Blue House]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Brick}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:25, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=14:23, September 5, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#The ''quintessence'' of a horrible, horrible Uncyclopedia article. Randomness, bad language, and pointless lists searching for a concept which floats somewhere, out there, just over the horizon, and permanently out of reach.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104152531}}
+
#{{Delete}} It is lists from start to end because it has no comedy strategy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:23 5-Sep-14</small>
#{{Delete}} And don't forget: Make gay sex the principal theme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:42 4-Nov-12</small>
+
#I fixed the formatting a bit, but it didn't improve the article any. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140907134221}}
#{{Delete}} Can't stand reading it all!--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 23:05, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} It is just a list and it is not funny. [[User:TempSwampert11|TempSwampert11]] ([[User talk:TempSwampert11|talk]]) 23:38, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Listing very badly, shipping bilge water by the ton. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 22:12, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Random mass of pointless falsehoods [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 21:01, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Ubergrue]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Nexon}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:25, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=11:32, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#{{keep}} not bad enough. same problem as [[Eurg]].--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Please God make the Grue shit stop.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104152531}}
+
#{{Delete}} This poorly written article about an online gaming company has descended to ranting by unhappy customers. We do it better at, for example, [[Poptropica]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:32 8-Sep-14</small>
#{{Delete}} Some author thinks that the Grue is so delightful and fundamental that writing anything to do with it will let him fit in, and that reversing the letters to bloviate about the Eurg is just another base he must touch. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:46 4-Nov-12</small>
+
#Hitler and nonsense numbers... not good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140909025412}}
  +
#{{Delete}} All the reasons above. [[User:TempSwampert11|TempSwampert11]] ([[User talk:TempSwampert11|talk]]) 23:41, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Too much total nonsense, too much hitler, too much boring, not enough haha. Not any, in fact, as far as I could see. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 00:53, September 17, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Winnie the Pooh]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Knights who say Ni}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:57, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDg|time=23:47, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#Winnie is the shit!--{{User:Naughtyned/sig}} 14:42, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=5
|delnumber=3
+
|delete=
|delete=#Total irredeemable ''shit''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104145700}}
+
#{{Delete}} A tribute to a Monty Python skit, with no value added by Uncyclopedians. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 10-Sep-14</small>
#{{Delete}} {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 15:01, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
#A rehashing of the events of the skit with some bits of randomness tacked on. More effort would be needed to make this any good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140911192105}}
#{{Delete}} Shit jokes and Nigger jokes. I feel the author went on from this unfunny character assassination to author several of the year's political campaigns around here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 4-Nov-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Sorta a bit funny but also not. --[[User:Moonhead42|Moonhead 42]] ([[User talk:Moonhead42|talk]]) 23:42, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Seems pointless to riff off someone else's joke and then come up with no new angle. At least {{u|Zarbag}}'s [[Biggus Dickus]] spins off profitably. This one doesn't. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:09, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 20:54, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Jonathan Ross]]==
+
== {{VFDn|FEATURE THIS ARTICLE DAMNIT!}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:12, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=16:40, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=4
#{{Keep}} A real article about a real British film reviewer, based on real things. Unfortunately, it's primarily based on one real thing--the subject's speech impediment--until author titles the fifth section: '''OK, so this whole 'R' joke is getting a bit shit now'''. Overuses quotes, memes, gay humor, and the one real joke. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:59 4-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Keep}} It didn't make me laugh out loud but it was funny. As Spike said it overuses one joke and that's just fine. <i>Lu</i> 18:18, November 12, 2012 (UTC)<small>13:17 12-Nov-12</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Hello! I bwought this hewe because I don't know if it's any good, ow if it's any bad, and also because I don't know who "Jonathan Woss" is. It weads like Elmuh-Fudd-style gibbewish to me.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104131231}}
+
#{{Delete}} This 2007 appeal to Uncyclopedians by {{U|PoopISVERYgood}} ("Very bored, so I made this quick article.") offers the reader nothing. (VFH failed.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:40 16-Sep-14</small>
  +
#The swearing, rape, etc kill it for me. I feel like I've seen this concept done better in another article, but I can't think of it. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140916190848}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Crap by any other name. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:11, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Been here since 2007, and that's already way too long [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 21:58, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I exchanged the contents so that [[Jonathan Ross]] is the article and [[Wossy]], which no one will ever type, is the redirect. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:59 4-Nov-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|Faggotry}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=16:51, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=5
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
+
#A fine piece of work by notoriously bad writer {{u|Mr-ex777}}, who is now not here to add his negative two cents. [[User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Faggotry]] is my attempt at a rewrite, which I've brought over from the fork; [{{fullurl:Faggotry|oldid=5464024}} this] is the last revision prior to Mr-ex's rewrite. I suggest replacing the current article with one or the other of those. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140916165121}}
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
#{{Delete|Replace.}} The article leads with the trite "nobody knows" theme and has entire sections disparaging "furfaggots" and Jews. Pre-rewrite was list-heavy and its main humor strategy was in calling various groups faggots. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:00 16-Sep-14</small>
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
#{{Delete|Annihilate}} Ugh. Does the world really need an article on this topic? [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 19:16, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
#{{Delete}} Starts off as your standard VFD-bound unfunny article, and then escalates towards intentionaly offensive insults at Jews, like a tamer Encyclopedia Dramatica (I couldn't care less about bronies, but it seems "furfaggot" is pretty much the same thing). In short, being offensive for shock value instead of humour value. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:48, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
#{{Delete}} Seems to be written in a code I care not to bother with. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:07, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
*Please nominate without [[drama]], either the interwiki variety or by disparaging other Uncyclopedians. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:00 16-Sep-14</small>
  +
*:Ok. Sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140916190526}}
  +
*As this has gotten to +5 in 3 hours, I remind other Admins that it is still entitled to 24 hours' notice before deletion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:10 16-Sep-14</small>
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 00:53, September 17, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Johnson County, Kansas H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 868 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. Spıke ¬ 10:31 12-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Small town Kansas Kruft. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very large amount of text that is also dull. (User talk:Moonhead42) 6:13, September 3rd, 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. Rocketsled (talk) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. Spıke ¬ 15:01 24-Aug-14
  • There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs paper sauce) 00:41 30 Aug 2014

edit Mudripper H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 460 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. Spıke ¬ 10:56 29-Aug-14
  2. Does not jump the bar. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs rabbits) 01:59 30 Aug 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Looks like disguised group vanity. I searched this term and it points back here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:39, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:51, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Slackware H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 423 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. Spıke ¬ 23:55 30-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote He invented what we call today, "water" -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs dogs) 17:31 31 Aug 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • And on 17 July 2007 an IP made a single edit, which was to spam an ad for Slackware into the article in a new section titled 'usage'. It sticks out like a sore thumb if you read that far. Apparently nobody noticed (maybe nobody's ever read that far in the article), since the section is still there, still just as serious and non-funny as it was the day it was plopped into the article. Snarglefoop (talk) 19:32, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
    I just read it, it isn't clear to me it's an ad, nor that it's unfunny, nor why it is funny if it is meant to be funny. A fifth Delete vote and no one has to answer this question. But you are free to try to improve an article while it is being voted on. Spıke ¬ 19:51 16-Sep-14
    Eh hmmm.... I just re-read it, and I think I was wrong -- that section is 'way too over the top to be a serious ad for Slackware. Microsoft uses it internally, and the Debian project uses it for their servers -- yeah right. And out here in the real world, the shuttle uses used IBM software, and IBM has its own version of Unix. So, I guess the author of that section took me in, at least. (And I'm still undecided on whether the article is salvageable which is why I voted neither yay nor nay.) Snarglefoop (talk) 20:03, September 16, 2014 (UTC)

edit Stanley Random Chess H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 360 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Stanley Random Article. The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. Spıke ¬ 14:38 2-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Confusing though somehow funny? Even so not funny enough to warrant the absurdity. User talk:Moonhead42 6:26, 3rd september.
  4. Starts off badly and turns into an apparently serious article. The fact that it is a hoax does not suffice to make it acceptable. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cake) 22:51 6 Sep 2014
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is ripped off from an article at ChessVariants.org, much of it copied word for word. That, and it's not especially funny. (I suppose it was originally inspired by Fischer Random Chess, which is a real game.) Snarglefoop (talk) 22:20, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hélio Castroneves H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 333 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote I am crying because i have won a lot off money, and the government, is going to steal all of it! i got to make a run for it! It is that dumb throughout. Spıke ¬ 17:19 3-Sep-14
  2. Hey, what happened to the sprites? They're AWOL again. (Oh yeah, and the article is bad.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cake) 02:50 7 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:18, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Who? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ugh. Bad. Cross between total incoherence and an attack article. (BTW the Wikipedia article on him has some entertaining bits, including, "an Internal Revenue Service agent testified that Castroneves owed U.S. taxes on the full $5 million from Penske even though he had never actually received the money". Man that's the IRS alright.) Snarglefoop (talk) 20:38, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Brick H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 288 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is lists from start to end because it has no comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 14:23 5-Sep-14
  2. I fixed the formatting a bit, but it didn't improve the article any. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cake) 13:42 7 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. It is just a list and it is not funny. TempSwampert11 (talk) 23:38, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random mass of pointless falsehoods Snarglefoop (talk) 21:01, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Nexon H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 219 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This poorly written article about an online gaming company has descended to ranting by unhappy customers. We do it better at, for example, Poptropica. Spıke ¬ 11:32 8-Sep-14
  2. Hitler and nonsense numbers... not good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs paper sauce) 02:54 9 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the reasons above. TempSwampert11 (talk) 23:41, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Too much total nonsense, too much hitler, too much boring, not enough haha. Not any, in fact, as far as I could see. Snarglefoop (talk) 00:53, September 17, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Knights who say Ni H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 159 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A tribute to a Monty Python skit, with no value added by Uncyclopedians. Spıke ¬ 23:47 10-Sep-14
  2. A rehashing of the events of the skit with some bits of randomness tacked on. More effort would be needed to make this any good. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cold cats) 19:21 11 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sorta a bit funny but also not. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:42, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seems pointless to riff off someone else's joke and then come up with no new angle. At least Zarbag's Biggus Dickus spins off profitably. This one doesn't. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:09, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 20:54, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit FEATURE THIS ARTICLE DAMNIT! H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 22 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 appeal to Uncyclopedians by PoopISVERYgood ("Very bored, so I made this quick article.") offers the reader nothing. (VFH failed.) Spıke ¬ 16:40 16-Sep-14
  2. The swearing, rape, etc kill it for me. I feel like I've seen this concept done better in another article, but I can't think of it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs paper sauce) 19:08 16 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Crap by any other name. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:11, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Been here since 2007, and that's already way too long Snarglefoop (talk) 21:58, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Faggotry H T D

Score: 5
Elapsed Time: 22 hours
Delete (5)
  1. A fine piece of work by notoriously bad writer Mr-ex777, who is now not here to add his negative two cents. User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Faggotry is my attempt at a rewrite, which I've brought over from the fork; this is the last revision prior to Mr-ex's rewrite. I suggest replacing the current article with one or the other of those. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs cake) 16:51 16 Sep 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Replace. The article leads with the trite "nobody knows" theme and has entire sections disparaging "furfaggots" and Jews. Pre-rewrite was list-heavy and its main humor strategy was in calling various groups faggots. Spıke ¬ 17:00 16-Sep-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Annihilate Ugh. Does the world really need an article on this topic? Snarglefoop (talk) 19:16, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off as your standard VFD-bound unfunny article, and then escalates towards intentionaly offensive insults at Jews, like a tamer Encyclopedia Dramatica (I couldn't care less about bronies, but it seems "furfaggot" is pretty much the same thing). In short, being offensive for shock value instead of humour value. ConCass2 (talk) 19:48, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seems to be written in a code I care not to bother with. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:07, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Please nominate without drama, either the interwiki variety or by disparaging other Uncyclopedians. Spıke ¬ 17:00 16-Sep-14
    Ok. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talk contribs hot dogs) 19:05 16 Sep 2014
  • As this has gotten to +5 in 3 hours, I remind other Admins that it is still entitled to 24 hours' notice before deletion. Spıke ¬ 20:10 16-Sep-14
Personal tools
projects