Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDc|Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit}})
({{VFDn|Niggle}}: Archive)
 
(8,273 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get Expelled from School}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=12:50, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|A load of poopy.}} Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:50 11-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete|Delete.}} Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pupil misbehavior ''can'' be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at [[Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]]. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. [[User:Simsilikesims|Simsilikesims]] ([[User talk:Simsilikesims|talk]]) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Redirect}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
 
==[[Hermann Goering]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:57, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} A real article about a real person. Much better than the other one we used to have (see '''Comments'''), uses decent writing style, even has a comedy strategy (politely soft-pedaling genocide, and later implying that Goering himself might have edited the article). Not delete-worthy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:04 11-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{keep}} Best line in the article: "often spelled Goering due to wartime shortages of umlauted characters" {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 18:56, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} --{{User:Hotadmin4u69/sig}}<small><font color="#2B547E">21:08</font><font color="#387C44"> Nov 13 </font><font color="#2B547E"> 2012</font></small>
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Not funny at all...--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 13:57, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Keep}} I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*We deleted the other one; see [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive268#H.W. Goering]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:59 11-Nov-12</small>
+
*Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit ''à la'' "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
*'''Page moved.''' The page used to be named "Hermann Goering (politician)"; the current name was a disambiguation page to here and to the other article that we deleted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:09 11-Nov-12</small> PS--I changed "Hermann Goering (politician)" to a redirect but it is now deleted via QVFD. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:58 15-Nov-12</small>
+
*Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  +
*EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::Okay, great! I'll just finish my [[Sex change]] and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
:::Thanks a lot! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Making up Oscar Wilde Quotes]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:21, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} I still get a laugh when I'm having a bad day when I get on here and look at this article. Personally, I think it should just be kept for how it can brighten any day, except Oscar Wilde's. [[User:ResurrectedSage|RS]] ([[User talk:ResurrectedSage|talk]]) 22:13, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''KEEP''' There's just no point in deleting this. {{User:Matt lobster/sig}} 22:36, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{keep}}--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 02:58, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} It's just a mostly-sexual list of crap not really about Oscar Wilde. I've already had my run in with sexually crude things not being funny and I find this to be no different. When it's not sexual, it's "Your Mom" and similar jokes of immature level. --LuMontyZ Was Here 19:21, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
#:I have a similar problem with gratuitous potty humor. However, Oscar Wilde is not only Uncyclopedia's Patron Meme but a gay pervert, and thus the perfect Wildeism is gratuitous potty humor that is not really about Oscar Wilde. In fact, Wildeisms that don't have some sort of double meaning ought to be eliminated. I'm holding off voting; don't remember the details, but I seem to recall that all the site's Wildeisms are cross-linked; I got VFD's approval two years ago to delete some component of this and found I had to undo my work. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:35 10-Nov-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A nice idea, but unfinished. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
#{{delete}} Unnecessary, we have [[Uncyclopedia:Wilde]]. {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 22:19, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
|comments=
 
*Don't know how nominator got this nomination to be born with an age of 5 hours (probably cut-and-pasting the timestamp) but I've set it to the timestamp of his signature. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:35 10-Nov-12</small>
 
*Sorry about the timestamp deal. I just copied the template like the instructions said. Thanks for fixing it. I guess my beef with this article is that because it's "The Patron meme" it's fine, but my former article that revolved around Fire Emblem, shipping, and crude jokes about the shipping was delete after vote because it was "too crude." I just want some consistency here. LuMontyZ Was Here 17:40, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Consistency? Dream on! {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:42 11-Nov-12</small>
 
*:Seriously, I try to show consistency (because it makes me more persuasive and proves that a Delete vote is not personal) but it is not required. Voters on VFD are voters, not paper-graders, and are allowed to vote any way for any reason; if they have criteria, they are allowed to have as many exceptions and special cases as to seem that there are no principles at all--though, again, that is less persuasive than consistency. Voters above all are not required to have the '''same''' criteria for what should stay and what should go. You ought not nominate something on VFD as real or perceived retaliation for the deletion of an article of yours. In addition, "too crude" might not mean vulgarity or sexual references; it might mean crude typography or facile humor, such as puns on people's names. It's conventional here to include [[User:SPIKE|links]] to what you are talking about so we can see for ourselves and perhaps give you more relevant advice. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:01 12-Nov-12</small>
 
*I get what you mean completely. It isn't personal. In fact, if I knew that this page was the Patron Meme of this site I wouldn't have bothered. I suppose as an aspiring math teacher I've been trying to grade papers. I hope I didn't come across as petty or angry. This is the article[[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:LuMontyZ/Fire_Emblem:_Abridged]] specifically the version before today's edit. I appreciate any feedback. LuMontyZ 04:16, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:No need to feel that you shouldn't have VFD'ed the article. Any article, no matter how hallowed, shouldn't be allowed to stick around if it is a tedious mess, like this one. Somebody should reach in there and kick just about 90% of these "quotes" out on their sorry asses, for being devoid of humor.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121113163510}}
 
*::It was I who nominated that article of yours for deletion (see [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive265#Fire_Emblem:_Abridged|archive 265]]) and I have now given you a detailed review on your user page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:05 14-Nov-12</small>
 
*I'm glad someone agrees! I'm not sorry, it's just the feeling when you find out how, to use your word BizzeeBeever, hallowed something is. Then comes the feeling that says it's untouchable. <i>Lu</i> 00:15, November 14, 2012 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
== [[English Class]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=16:18, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
#{{Keep}} The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:29 14-Jul-15</small>
|delete=
 
#Ehhh. I get the "joke" here, and it isn't funny.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121108161835}}
 
#{{Delete}} I didn't even get that far. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:33 8-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Delete|English sucks.}} {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig|17:31|10|November|2012}}
 
#{{Delete}} What else??--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 23:03, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Basingstoke]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|SGML}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:36, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
# We get it. <Your_city_here/> is a horrible, horrible nightmare of a place, filled with chavs, drunken chavs, drunken chavs having sex, drunken chavs having drunken ''gay'' sex, [[OVER 9000|several]] traffic circles, and (for a bit of variety) ...some chavs. If you don't like your town/city/state/province/country, please feel free to die or move away. ''Just take your shitty article with you.'' {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104163628}}
+
#{{Delete}} Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
# Delete as '''Vanity'''. Besides, why is this located at "Basingstoke" and not "Basingrad"? {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 18:52, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
#:Because Basingstoke is the name of a city and thus a valid name for an encyclopedia article; whereas Basingrad is the punch line of a joke (a trite joke, styling a place after the Soviet Union), which no one is going to type. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:32 4-Nov-12</small>
+
|keepnumber=2
|comments=
 
*{{Abstain}} All of the humor is trite and none of it is clever. But I would not see, in our campaign against chavcruft, a new, large hole open up at Basingstoke, a few miles away from the gaping hole at Reading, where we have no article (not even for that [[Pennsylvania|other]] Reading in that other Berkshire that is pronounced the way it's written) and people mentioning snooker tournaments have to use a link to book-[[Reading]]. We are laying waste to the English countryside. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 4-Nov-12</small>
 
*I have been to Basingstoke so I will have to abstain in case that visit left me biased in either direction. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 22:09, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Then you ought not just abstain but '''repair'''. I was driven through Basingstoke once on my way to work in [[Reading]]. It had an ICL plant and a cinema. Slough, now that (phew!) deserves a replacement article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:06 12-Nov-12</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Bear in the Big Blue House]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:25, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
#{{Keep}} [[WP:SuicideGirls|SuicideGirls]] seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
|delete=
+
#{{Keep}} Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
#The ''quintessence'' of a horrible, horrible Uncyclopedia article. Randomness, bad language, and pointless lists searching for a concept which floats somewhere, out there, just over the horizon, and permanently out of reach.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104152531}}
 
#{{Delete}} And don't forget: Make gay sex the principal theme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:42 4-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Can't stand reading it all!--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 23:05, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Listing very badly, shipping bilge water by the ton. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 22:12, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*'''Renamed.''' Used to be [[Suicide Girl Markup Language]], but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Ubergrue]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:25, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=#{{keep}} not bad enough. same problem as [[Eurg]].--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Please God make the Grue shit stop.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104152531}}
+
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Some author thinks that the Grue is so delightful and fundamental that writing anything to do with it will let him fit in, and that reversing the letters to bloviate about the Eurg is just another base he must touch. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:46 4-Nov-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Winnie the Pooh]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:57, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#Winnie is the shit!--{{User:Naughtyned/sig}} 14:42, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#Total irredeemable ''shit''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104145700}}
 
#{{Delete}} {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 15:01, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Shit jokes and Nigger jokes. I feel the author went on from this unfunny character assassination to author several of the year's political campaigns around here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 4-Nov-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
==[[Jonathan Ross]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=17:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=13:12, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} A real article about a real British film reviewer, based on real things. Unfortunately, it's primarily based on one real thing--the subject's speech impediment--until author titles the fifth section: '''OK, so this whole 'R' joke is getting a bit shit now'''. Overuses quotes, memes, gay humor, and the one real joke. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:59 4-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Keep}} It didn't make me laugh out loud but it was funny. As Spike said it overuses one joke and that's just fine. <i>Lu</i> 18:18, November 12, 2012 (UTC)<small>13:17 12-Nov-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Hello! I bwought this hewe because I don't know if it's any good, ow if it's any bad, and also because I don't know who "Jonathan Woss" is. It weads like Elmuh-Fudd-style gibbewish to me.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104131231}}
+
#{{Delete}} Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:30 28-Jul-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I exchanged the contents so that [[Jonathan Ross]] is the article and [[Wossy]], which no one will ever type, is the redirect. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:59 4-Nov-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 07:16, July 31, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit HowTo:Get Expelled from School H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 474 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote A load of poopy. Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:50 11-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--EStop (talk) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pupil misbehavior can be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. Simsilikesims (talk) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

edit Redirect H T D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 396 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit à la "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  • Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  • EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, great! I'll just finish my Sex change and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--EStop (talk) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

edit The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 396 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A nice idea, but unfinished. --EStop (talk) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:29 14-Jul-15
Comments

edit SGML H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 260 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. SuicideGirls seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--EStop (talk) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Renamed. Used to be Suicide Girl Markup Language, but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 129 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15

edit Exploding Testicles H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 61 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:30 28-Jul-15
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects