Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
({{VFDc|Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit}})
m ({{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}})
 
(8,127 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=#Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pointless. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:04 6-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
==[[Hermann Goering]]==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=13:57, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
+
#Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
|keepnumber=3
+
#{{Delete}} Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} A real article about a real person. Much better than the other one we used to have (see '''Comments'''), uses decent writing style, even has a comedy strategy (politely soft-pedaling genocide, and later implying that Goering himself might have edited the article). Not delete-worthy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:04 11-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{keep}} Best line in the article: "often spelled Goering due to wartime shortages of umlauted characters" {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 18:56, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} --{{User:Hotadmin4u69/sig}}<small><font color="#2B547E">21:08</font><font color="#387C44"> Nov 13 </font><font color="#2B547E"> 2012</font></small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Not funny at all...--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 13:57, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*We deleted the other one; see [[Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive268#H.W. Goering]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:59 11-Nov-12</small>
+
*Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:17 12-Jun-15</small>
*'''Page moved.''' The page used to be named "Hermann Goering (politician)"; the current name was a disambiguation page to here and to the other article that we deleted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:09 11-Nov-12</small> PS--I changed "Hermann Goering (politician)" to a redirect but it is now deleted via QVFD. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:58 15-Nov-12</small>
+
::You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like [[Rembrandt]] or [[Glory hole]]), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Making up Oscar Wilde Quotes]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Never-Ending Story}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:21, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=08:19, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Image-free randumbo. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Never compose while on drugs. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:42 10-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Felt like it would never end. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} I still get a laugh when I'm having a bad day when I get on here and look at this article. Personally, I think it should just be kept for how it can brighten any day, except Oscar Wilde's. [[User:ResurrectedSage|RS]] ([[User talk:ResurrectedSage|talk]]) 22:13, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''KEEP''' There's just no point in deleting this. {{User:Matt lobster/sig}} 22:36, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{keep}}--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 02:58, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} It's just a mostly-sexual list of crap not really about Oscar Wilde. I've already had my run in with sexually crude things not being funny and I find this to be no different. When it's not sexual, it's "Your Mom" and similar jokes of immature level. --LuMontyZ Was Here 19:21, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:I have a similar problem with gratuitous potty humor. However, Oscar Wilde is not only Uncyclopedia's Patron Meme but a gay pervert, and thus the perfect Wildeism is gratuitous potty humor that is not really about Oscar Wilde. In fact, Wildeisms that don't have some sort of double meaning ought to be eliminated. I'm holding off voting; don't remember the details, but I seem to recall that all the site's Wildeisms are cross-linked; I got VFD's approval two years ago to delete some component of this and found I had to undo my work. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:35 10-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{delete}} Unnecessary, we have [[Uncyclopedia:Wilde]]. {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 22:19, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Don't know how nominator got this nomination to be born with an age of 5 hours (probably cut-and-pasting the timestamp) but I've set it to the timestamp of his signature. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:35 10-Nov-12</small>
 
*Sorry about the timestamp deal. I just copied the template like the instructions said. Thanks for fixing it. I guess my beef with this article is that because it's "The Patron meme" it's fine, but my former article that revolved around Fire Emblem, shipping, and crude jokes about the shipping was delete after vote because it was "too crude." I just want some consistency here. LuMontyZ Was Here 17:40, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Consistency? Dream on! {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:42 11-Nov-12</small>
 
*:Seriously, I try to show consistency (because it makes me more persuasive and proves that a Delete vote is not personal) but it is not required. Voters on VFD are voters, not paper-graders, and are allowed to vote any way for any reason; if they have criteria, they are allowed to have as many exceptions and special cases as to seem that there are no principles at all--though, again, that is less persuasive than consistency. Voters above all are not required to have the '''same''' criteria for what should stay and what should go. You ought not nominate something on VFD as real or perceived retaliation for the deletion of an article of yours. In addition, "too crude" might not mean vulgarity or sexual references; it might mean crude typography or facile humor, such as puns on people's names. It's conventional here to include [[User:SPIKE|links]] to what you are talking about so we can see for ourselves and perhaps give you more relevant advice. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:01 12-Nov-12</small>
 
*I get what you mean completely. It isn't personal. In fact, if I knew that this page was the Patron Meme of this site I wouldn't have bothered. I suppose as an aspiring math teacher I've been trying to grade papers. I hope I didn't come across as petty or angry. This is the article[[http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:LuMontyZ/Fire_Emblem:_Abridged]] specifically the version before today's edit. I appreciate any feedback. LuMontyZ 04:16, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:No need to feel that you shouldn't have VFD'ed the article. Any article, no matter how hallowed, shouldn't be allowed to stick around if it is a tedious mess, like this one. Somebody should reach in there and kick just about 90% of these "quotes" out on their sorry asses, for being devoid of humor.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121113163510}}
 
*::It was I who nominated that article of yours for deletion (see [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive265#Fire_Emblem:_Abridged|archive 265]]) and I have now given you a detailed review on your user page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:05 14-Nov-12</small>
 
*I'm glad someone agrees! I'm not sorry, it's just the feeling when you find out how, to use your word BizzeeBeever, hallowed something is. Then comes the feeling that says it's untouchable. <i>Lu</i> 00:15, November 14, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[English Class]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:18, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=20:55, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>20:55 21-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#Ehhh. I get the "joke" here, and it isn't funny.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121108161835}}
 
#{{Delete}} I didn't even get that far. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:33 8-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Delete|English sucks.}} {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig|17:31|10|November|2012}}
 
#{{Delete}} What else??--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 23:03, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Basingstoke]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Marx Shrugged}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=16:36, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=22:08, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
# We get it. <Your_city_here/> is a horrible, horrible nightmare of a place, filled with chavs, drunken chavs, drunken chavs having sex, drunken chavs having drunken ''gay'' sex, [[OVER 9000|several]] traffic circles, and (for a bit of variety) ...some chavs. If you don't like your town/city/state/province/country, please feel free to die or move away. ''Just take your shitty article with you.'' {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104163628}}
+
#{{Delete}} 2010 author {{U|Weri long wang}} writes the opposite of the plot of ''Atlas Shrugged,'' then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:08 21-Jun-15</small>
# Delete as '''Vanity'''. Besides, why is this located at "Basingstoke" and not "Basingrad"? {{User:Qzekrom/sig8}} 18:52, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Not funny. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
#:Because Basingstoke is the name of a city and thus a valid name for an encyclopedia article; whereas Basingrad is the punch line of a joke (a trite joke, styling a place after the Soviet Union), which no one is going to type. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:32 4-Nov-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
*{{Abstain}} All of the humor is trite and none of it is clever. But I would not see, in our campaign against chavcruft, a new, large hole open up at Basingstoke, a few miles away from the gaping hole at Reading, where we have no article (not even for that [[Pennsylvania|other]] Reading in that other Berkshire that is pronounced the way it's written) and people mentioning snooker tournaments have to use a link to book-[[Reading]]. We are laying waste to the English countryside. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 4-Nov-12</small>
 
*I have been to Basingstoke so I will have to abstain in case that visit left me biased in either direction. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 22:09, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Then you ought not just abstain but '''repair'''. I was driven through Basingstoke once on my way to work in [[Reading]]. It had an ICL plant and a cinema. Slough, now that (phew!) deserves a replacement article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:06 12-Nov-12</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Bear in the Big Blue House]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:25, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#The ''quintessence'' of a horrible, horrible Uncyclopedia article. Randomness, bad language, and pointless lists searching for a concept which floats somewhere, out there, just over the horizon, and permanently out of reach.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104152531}}
 
#{{Delete}} And don't forget: Make gay sex the principal theme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:42 4-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Can't stand reading it all!--{{User:Sinner George/sig}} 23:05, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Listing very badly, shipping bilge water by the ton. --{{User:Romartus/sig}} 22:12, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Ubergrue]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Latte}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:25, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=18:03, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>18:03 26-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Should have called it Frappe. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
|keep=#{{keep}} not bad enough. same problem as [[Eurg]].--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keep=#It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~[[User:Everyotherusernamewastaken|''Every''<small>'''OtherUsernameWasTaken'''</small>]]''([[User talk:Everyotherusernamewastaken|dtf?]])'' 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#Please God make the Grue shit stop.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104152531}}
 
#{{Delete}} Some author thinks that the Grue is so delightful and fundamental that writing anything to do with it will let him fit in, and that reversing the letters to bloviate about the Eurg is just another base he must touch. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:46 4-Nov-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Winnie the Pooh]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Who Do You Think}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:57, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=#Winnie is the shit!--{{User:Naughtyned/sig}} 14:42, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#Total irredeemable ''shit''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104145700}}
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 15:01, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
#No redeeming value as far as I can tell {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Shit jokes and Nigger jokes. I feel the author went on from this unfunny character assassination to author several of the year's political campaigns around here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:49 4-Nov-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>14:20 28-Jun-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Baffling gibberish. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Jonathan Ross]]==
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:12, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=03:35, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} A real article about a real British film reviewer, based on real things. Unfortunately, it's primarily based on one real thing--the subject's speech impediment--until author titles the fifth section: '''OK, so this whole 'R' joke is getting a bit shit now'''. Overuses quotes, memes, gay humor, and the one real joke. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:59 4-Nov-12</small>
 
#{{Keep}} It didn't make me laugh out loud but it was funny. As Spike said it overuses one joke and that's just fine. <i>Lu</i> 18:18, November 12, 2012 (UTC)<small>13:17 12-Nov-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Hello! I bwought this hewe because I don't know if it's any good, ow if it's any bad, and also because I don't know who "Jonathan Woss" is. It weads like Elmuh-Fudd-style gibbewish to me.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20121104131231}}
+
#{{Delete}} Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>03:35 30-Jun-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I exchanged the contents so that [[Jonathan Ross]] is the article and [[Wossy]], which no one will ever type, is the redirect. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:59 4-Nov-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 17:21, June 30, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit UnScripts:The Importance of Being King Minos H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 674 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Badly written, badly formatted, has a really bad and premature ending, plus I'm not sure what it's supposed to be parodying. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 3, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pointless. Spıke Ѧ 17:04 6-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:15, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. -- Well it is supposed to be a pun on the Importance of Being Earnest but this has no connection to Oscar's work even as a parody. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:21, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 576 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Pointless piece about made-up Spanish TV show. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 18:00, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not in Wikipedia; Google search comes to us first. The tedious Intro with a list of Spanish-language joke movie titles could be fixed, but the concept itself has no basis. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:09, June 21, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:19, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Author is in the middle of the most gradual rage-quit in Uncyclopedia history (including nominating all his own stuff for deletion so that the rest of us have to drop everything and read his "work"), as it is unfair to him and a commentary on someone else's personality that he can't write funny things to himself all day that no one else will look for or appreciate. Maybe this should be saved somewhere as evidence of something. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 12-Jun-15
You have a real knack for inventing unflattering motives for things you can't explain. Anyway, it has proved useful to have my stuff on VFD, not because I personally think it's bad (I think this article for instance is much funnier than articles I wrote that got featured like Rembrandt or Glory hole), but because they obviously aren't suitable for this site. Since when has Uncyclopedia been a comedy site anyway? ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
And about the gradual rage quit thing, it would have happened quicker but I have been a little busy. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:30, June 16, 2015 (UTC)

edit Never-Ending Story H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 514 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Image-free randumbo. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, June 10, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Never compose while on drugs. Spıke Ѧ 11:42 10-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe it's only because I've actually never read the book or seen the movie, but I just don't get any of it. Except maybe the "Excerpt" section, but even that's not very funny, and certainly won't make any sense to anyone without exposure to programming. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 19:25, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Felt like it would never end. --EStop (talk) 08:22, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 237 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon asserts on the talk page that the material is largely plagiarized from Monty Python. Spıke Radiomicrophone20:55 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A somewhat pointless re-telling of someone else's joke without making it interesting enough to save. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:12, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 08:24, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Marx Shrugged H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 236 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2010 author Weri long wang writes the opposite of the plot of Atlas Shrugged, then reverses the title too, just to make sure no one can find it. There is no other humor than to invent an acronym of C.U.N.T. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:08 21-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. --EStop (talk) 08:27, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Latte H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 120 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Barely manages complete English sentences before it devolves into one list after another. Spıke Radiomicrophone18:03 26-Jun-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If the jokes are worth keeping, then perhaps they should be recycled after a rewrite. But overall, this article is currently awful. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 04:02, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Should have called it Frappe. --EStop (talk) 08:30, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. It may be badly written, formatted, and -- God forbid! -- use lists, but there are certainly enough good jokes to keep. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 16:02, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit Who Do You Think H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 76 hours
Delete (3)
  1. No redeeming value as far as I can tell Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:08, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not even ramble, but babble, and about a nonexistent character. No comedy strategy other than rant-at-the-reader. Spıke Radiomicrophone14:20 28-Jun-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Baffling gibberish. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:39, June 28, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit HowTo:Trick Women in 3 Easy Steps H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 38 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Smug article from someone who has tricked a woman. A waste of the reader's time. Spıke Radiomicrophone03:35 30-Jun-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects