Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Walt Disney: new section)
({{VFDn|Dog}}: Tweak away)
 
(10,297 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
<!-- Why is the end stuff at the beginning? Because {VFDr} contains a form to nominate a new page that adds a section at the end. -->
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia voting pages]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Anarchy}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
==[[ARTICLE NAME HERE]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=02:53, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Has been under {{Tl|Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:53 14-Mar-16</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested. {{User:EStop/signature}} 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Lists. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:35, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
==[[Celebrity Big Brother]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=03:09, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Terrible shitty stupidness. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 03:09, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:35 5-Apr-16</small>
#Extremely messy, I would suggest putting a template on the page but since the page has been inactive for months I don't think there's any point. --[[User:Owen12345|Owen12345]] ([[User talk:Owen12345|talk]]) 03:32, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
#Cruft {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|04:02 30 Jul}}
+
#{{Delete}} Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'. {{User:EStop/signature}} 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Tscheap]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=18:48, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{User:Saberwolf116/Disintegrate}} [[User:Saberwolf116|Saberwolf116]] ([[User talk:Saberwolf116|talk]]) 18:48, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Tschit. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 18:51, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Unless a member of the Cabal can provide some Yiddish insight, I presume that Mr. Michael Tschiderer owes money to the author. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:10 29-Jul-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[User:Zombiebaron]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Colony of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=05:54, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=15:11, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>15:11 26-Apr-16</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{keep|Better than [[User:ChiefjusticeDS]]}} {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 05:58, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
#{{KeepRed|Zombiebaron.}} --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 18:52, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{User:Saberwolf116/Disintegrate|Zombiebaron.}} I just realized...Zombiebaron is a zombie. Ergo, he should be dead. Ergo, WE MUST KILL HIM! [[User:Saberwolf116|Saberwolf116]] ([[User talk:Saberwolf116|talk]]) 05:54, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Sure why not. -- {{User:Zombiebaron/sig}} 17:31, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Zombiebaron --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 19:54, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
#{{Abstain|Zombiebaron.}} {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''00:46, 30 July 2012''</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Gamecruft]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=02:10, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=4
 
|keep=#me lol--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:17, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{KeepRed}} I like it. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 14:55, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Yes.}} {{User:Kip the Dip/sig}} <small>18:26, Jul. 28, 2012</small>
 
#I find it ironic that Frosty wants to delete a page that pretty much embodies his beliefs in relation to our gamespace. So to answer Frosty's question, ''you care.'' {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''00:39, 30 July 2012''</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#Who cares? {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 02:10, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
==[[Internet wars]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=04:45, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=01:53, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete}} Crap. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 01:53, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive-2015-10#Dog|Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15]] as it just took Featured Article [[Dogs]] and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and {{U|EStop}} voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at [[User:EStop/Dogs]]. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:50 3-May-16</small>
#{{Delete}} Parc. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 14:51, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
#{{Obliterate}} By noobs, for noobs. Noobs: Please don't bother me with this shit, I'm trying to watch polar bears and a soccer game at the same time. ~ {{User:Qzekrom/sig7}} 21:13, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The new version is ready for the mainspace, once this is gone. {{User:EStop/signature}} 06:06, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=0
}}
 
 
==[[Ped Xing]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:03, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} Lacks humor? The article morphs the common pedestrian street sign into a Chinese podiatrist; a serious bio, until you read closely, with outrageous pix with more outrageous captions in a send-off of health care via franchise. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:01,18:37 27-Jul-12</small>
 
#idk it's not that bad. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 22:36, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#A good concept, but...it lacks...what's it called...humour, that's it. --{{User:Oliphaunte/sig2}} 21:03, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#What? --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 22:17, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Timer reset due to no VFD tag on article. There is now a VFD tag, 5 hours later. Also, this article is not just a rant - it tells a story of a jealous lover who went too far and killed his lover because he thought the dog was another lover. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 04:46, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
  +
*:Thanks for that! It seems we now have too many dogs and too little time. Can anyone go in and make the "rant" seem purposeful? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:17 4-May-16</small>
  +
*:PS--Having read it slowly, I doubt it and reassert my vote to delete it. This saga of performance art where the "encyclopedia article writer" can't write because he is irritated by the dog and despondent over the loss of his wife (before he killed her) amused the author, and might shock but will not amuse the reader. Save the wife, kill the article. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:58 4-May-16</small>
  +
*::I don't agree. The rant almost works, and the "comedy of surprise" element is there. But the replacement is better. This could be moved to [[Great Dane]] with minor tweaking and still work though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig1}} 22:13, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
  +
*:Tweak away. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>22:17 4-May-16</small>
 
}}
 
}}
 
==[[Faroe Islands]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:27, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} A real place, and it tries to be a real article. Saberwolf, rambling consists of random sentences; the sentences here are not very funny but are based on actual references to Danish stuff. Needs quoticide, listicide, and then better writing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:43 27-Jul-12</small>
 
#:In that case, I nominate YOU, sir.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120728120822}}
 
#::Have done a copy-edit. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:47 28-Jul-12</small>
 
#While this article is still kind of messy and it wouldn't hurt to remove the last navbox (which I have already done), I think this article has potential to live and become a quality article. I say '''Keep''' and put a stub or fix tag on it. ~ {{User:Qzekrom/sig7}} 21:22, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''Keep''' Spike has lezzed this up a little. {{User:Matt lobster/sig}} 23:18, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{User:Saberwolf116/Disintegrate}} Silly, idiotic, rambling article. [[User:Saberwolf116|Saberwolf116]] ([[User talk:Saberwolf116|talk]]) 17:27, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Gack! --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:53, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Love the [[:File:Pharaoh Dumeses I.jpg|photoshop]] (which came from somewhere else, OF COURSE). Hate the article.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120727072723}}
 
#{{delete}} {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 08:28, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 
 
== Walt Disney ==
 
 
ake it down.now.Walt disney was not a fucking sexist, and you're forgetting all the great things he ever fucking did for us. WHY THE HELL ARE YOU SAYING THAT WALT HAD SEX 2,000 TIMES YOU DUMBASSES! This guy is one of my idols. I don't care a bit about all these shit people write about him! R.I.P. Walt Disney, and thanks for all your wonderful, timeless animated movies!!! GODDAMIT THIS FUCKING SITE JUST FUCKING RUINED MY CHILDHOOD YOU MORONS!! - waltdisneyfan999
 

Latest revision as of 22:17, May 4, 2016

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Expert3222 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Anarchy H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1268 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Has been under {{Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). Spıke Radiomicrophone02:53 14-Mar-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested.  EStop Easy button 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lists. ConCass2 (talk) 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 742 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:35 5-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". ConCass2 (talk) 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'.  EStop Easy button 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Colony of America H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 223 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. Spıke Radiomicrophone15:11 26-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

edit Dog H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 66 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Last nominated for deletion 20-Oct-15 as it just took Featured Article Dogs and reversed stuff. 3 votes to delete; nominator voted Just Fix It and EStop voted Okay I'll Fix It. Both of us have, at User:EStop/Dogs. A Delete vote clears the way for this as a substitute. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:50 3-May-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. As I said last time, this is a horrid mash-up of bold text and ranting. Hurts the eyes. ConCass2 (talk) 06:35, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The new version is ready for the mainspace, once this is gone.  EStop Easy button 06:06, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Timer reset due to no VFD tag on article. There is now a VFD tag, 5 hours later. Also, this article is not just a rant - it tells a story of a jealous lover who went too far and killed his lover because he thought the dog was another lover. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:46, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
    Thanks for that! It seems we now have too many dogs and too little time. Can anyone go in and make the "rant" seem purposeful? Spıke Radiomicrophone12:17 4-May-16
    PS--Having read it slowly, I doubt it and reassert my vote to delete it. This saga of performance art where the "encyclopedia article writer" can't write because he is irritated by the dog and despondent over the loss of his wife (before he killed her) amused the author, and might shock but will not amuse the reader. Save the wife, kill the article. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:58 4-May-16
    I don't agree. The rant almost works, and the "comedy of surprise" element is there. But the replacement is better. This could be moved to Great Dane with minor tweaking and still work though. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 22:13, May 4, 2016 (UTC)
    Tweak away. Spıke Radiomicrophone22:17 4-May-16
Personal tools
projects