Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps)
({{VFDn|Borat Sagdiyev}}: Deleted)
 
(10,426 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|HowTo:Get Expelled from School}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
==[[ARTICLENAMEHERE]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=12:50, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|A load of poopy.}} Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>12:50 11-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete|Delete.}} Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pupil misbehavior ''can'' be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at [[Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid]]. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. [[User:Simsilikesims|Simsilikesims]] ([[User talk:Simsilikesims|talk]]) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Don't mingle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Borat Sagdiyev}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDg|time=18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=5
==[[Republic of Lee Kingdom]]==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=00:57, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Seems to be a simple retelling of the jokes from Borat's film. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Any author is free to re-create the article after devising an original comedy concept. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:19 14-Jul-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Parody of a parody.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 08:32, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Bad grammar is overdone. Filmography section fills up my screen. [[User:Ye Blacke Adder|Ye Blacke Adder]] ([[User talk:Ye Blacke Adder|talk]]) 06:15, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I think Sacha Baron Cohen beat you to it writer. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:41, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I believe this is about Singapore, which already has an article to itself. Also, so many redlinks and it just looks very unfunny. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Talk Talk]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Redirect}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=23:40, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=1
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Talking shit about a band does not make an article funny. In fact, it makes you look stupid. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Am always happy to vote against an article whose brand of humor is, "Look at me! I don't know what I'm talking about!" Band members include "The Other Guy" and "Another Guy" and not until Sec. 2 does anything relate to the actual band, and even then a quote is attributed to "some snobby assed music journalist." Lame. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 29-May-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[NASDAQ]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=22:15, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
# {{keep}} I fixed this up a bit, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Could be funny with a coordinated attack. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:36, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
#{{Keep|Rewritten.}} I fixed it up a bit more. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:12 29-May-12</small>
+
#{{Keep}} I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I don't like this. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* Having seen stock traders before, I would have to say that the tuxedo stereotype really adds flavor to this article! Speaking of which, have we an article about [[necktie]]s? --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
*Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit ''à la'' "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:26 14-Jul-15</small>
*:There's [[Clip-on tie]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:31 29-May-12</small>
+
*Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
*::Kay. There's also [[Bow tie]]. I'll make a disambiguation page. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
*This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  +
*EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
::Okay, great! I'll just finish my [[Sex change]] and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  +
:::Thanks a lot! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Malcolm Glazer]]==
+
== {{VFDn|The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A nice idea, but unfinished. --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#{{Keep}} It is about someone real and notable (the owner of the Manchester United football club). It has a theme (map him onto the ''Lord of the Rings''). It has a fun shoop. What it lacks is explanation about '''why''' he relates to ''Lord of the Rings''--it is random allegory but humor is not far away. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 29-May-12</small>
+
#{{Keep}} The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>19:29 14-Jul-15</small>
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete|I piss on this article}} And on the person responsible for it's cration. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#No funny. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Mesherschmit Vs. Spitfire]]==
+
== {{VFDn|SGML}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=04:02, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
#{{Keep}} [[WP:SuicideGirls|SuicideGirls]] seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
|delete=
+
#{{Keep}} Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
[[File:ATT00071.jpg|thumb|right|100px]]
 
#This is pure nonesense. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} The initial shoop is entertaining but will live on elsewhere. Misspelling in page name; Brits with bad teeth and small penises. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:54 29-May-12</small>
 
#Yeah, I really did like the picture. Everything else is trash.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529123127}}
 
#Meshershit Vs. Shitfire. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:17, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Ok, now why the ''Hell'' didn't ''I'' think of that? You bastard.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529213710}}
 
#::Lol--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 22:05, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*'''Renamed.''' Used to be [[Suicide Girl Markup Language]], but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>04:41 22-Jul-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Diet Cola]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Niggle}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=03:59, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDg|time=21:02, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=5
|delnumber=6
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Da fuq? {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Not funny, and there's a better version [[Niggers|here]]. {{Unsigned|EpicWinner}}
#It is garbage with no concept and a single image with a ''non sequitur'' caption. And it was written by two ten-year-olds who just ate a bunch of taffy. That's ''what the fuq''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071441}}
+
#{{Delete}} Offensive while nowhere on the road to funny. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:15 25-Jul-15</small>
# I hate those articles saying "That food/drink is evil!"--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:09, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Unfunny offensive duplicruft. (Vote button is missing, so voting manually). --[[User:TotalCuddles02|TotalCuddles02]] ([[User talk:TotalCuddles02|talk]]) 12:20, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Yes, Mr-ex777, that is about all this article says. A health scare needs to be done cleverly. I have grabbed the Hebrew Coke can for [[Diet Coke]], which itself is in sad shape. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 29-May-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Racism without decent humor. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 17:17, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
#Reads like vandalism. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 12:24, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
#{{burninate}} Too much crass, sex, and randomness. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:38, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
# {{delete|Huff, then turn into a content fork.}} This is currently the top article on [[Special:LongPages]], at 394,674 bytes. I suggest splitting it into separate articles by season, namely "Lost (TV series)/Season #". --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Is the material worth preserving, or not? If so, you hardly need our vote to organize it better. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:27 29-May-12</small>
 
#::{{Delete|Another reason to huff:}} It's illogical to have a subpage of [[Lost (TV series)|a redirect]]. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:::That's not a reason at all. It's very easy to change the title of the subpage so it's no longer a subpage of a redirect but of the page being redirected to. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''00:31, 30 May 2012''</small>
 
#::::Have we created a guide for choosing the best title for your work? If not, I can start one. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 01:55, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
#[[Supernatural (TV series)|Huff outright]]. Just like <<< that page, this one is bloated, tedious splooge.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071010}}
 
#Since Qzekrom brought this nom here more or less pointlessly, I am going to one-up him and vote to actually kill it a la Bizzee. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 19:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Pointless rambling. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Convinced by BB, below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:09 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment|Abstain.}} Am not sure that this or any article with satirical renditions of hour-long TV shows from 2004 is not funny to some niche audience, no matter how tedious they are (the parodies, not the audience), and this is why I also abstain from bandcruft, gamecruft, and fightcruft. Surely Star Trek, from about 1970, is doted on comparably and everyone approves. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:52 29-May-12</small>
+
*The alternative that nominator points to is not the same thing; if it were, the rules invite the nominator to revert the article to its best version. In this case, let's not even redirect, just make it go away. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>21:15 25-Jul-15</small>
*:I watched every last episode of Lost, and I can tell you that I personally do not find anything the least bit funny about this concentrated pile of Fail. As for Star Trek, I feel rather lukewarm towards it and its spin-offs. However, if there were a Star Trek article that was 400 kB long, and was as comparatively unfunny, I'd vote to kill that thing with nukes.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529215646}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Horizon]]==
+
== {{VFDn|I Think Satan Likes Your Mom}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=#Most of this seems more than acceptable content. Why are you nomming this? {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''14:03, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#This isn't bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 14:11, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} You have got to be joking.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#I've seen so many shit pages today, I'm kinda on He.Will.Kill's side on this one.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529070529}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
==[[Niggas in Paris]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=5
 
|keep=#Hey bro, don't be hatin' on my homie's sweet page, yo. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''13:56, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#'''Keep'''. I chuckled. Good enough. Spike can't tell me what's funny. -{{User:Optimuschris/sig}}<small><small>16:12, 28 May</small></small>
 
#Prolly as an appropriate article for the song as you can ever get. And it repeats itself because that's the joke. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 00:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} That shit cray. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 00:55, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Feature!--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 12:57, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} It repeats itself. How is that funny?--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have the answer. It's not. {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|13:28|28|May|2012}}
 
#{{Delete|Let's hear it again!}} No, let's not. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 28-May-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Constitution (Games)]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} "Constitution" is the stamina-like attribute of characters in role-playing games. Word play, such as "constitution" as the opposite of "prostitution," is a fine humor form we rarely see. This article unfortunately spreads a small amount of material very thin, but it's about something real, is intelligent, and it has an idea what it wants to achieve. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:24 27-May-12</small>
 
#'''Keep.''' It needs some work, like maybe an image or two, but it's promising. {{User:GEORGIEGIBBONS/sig}} 19:20, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Not bad enough.}} {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''12:27, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} The article was just.... I don't really know how to put it in words. It's bad, but as I read one, it got worst. It had a way of explaining itself, and it gets worse because it just puts some random stuff that's no sense and just very random and immature. If goes off topic more than once, and I honesty believe thaey were just putting stuff there just for the hell of it. It was so random and illogical, my brain actually felt really bad after trying to comprehend what the article is trying to say. I also highly doubt the subject that its talking about even exist (and if it does then it was not made by a intelligent person, and I'm not just saying that.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--[[User:EpicWinner|EpicWinner]] ([[User talk:EpicWinner|talk]]) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
#This is pretty bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 13:44, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*@SPIKE- That could work if it wasn't written so randomly.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
*A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen <code>It's Lym</code>. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>13:39 26-Jul-15</small>
*:Now we're down to quibbles. (Get started! I already saved one today.) I suggest a section listing famous personalities with high (or low) Constitution ratings (who bare all on the cinema: constitution/prostitution) with the implications for the D&D cards of each. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 27-May-12</small>
 
*:I dumped some new ideas into it and scrubbed the old D&D-cruft. But the result just doesn't hang together. Someone else should take a turn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:01 28-May-12</small>
 
----
 
*Previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive260#Constitution_.28Games.29|VFD'd]], Jan'12; 0-3 Delete; kept by Lyrithya citing "apathy." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:35 27-May-12</small>
 
*Better title would be [[Constitution (gaming)]] but is protected to Admins due to past vandalism. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:38 27-May-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Tank Abbot]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Exploding Testicles}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=09:52, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=17:30, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#'''Keep'''. Weaker stuff - amusing for those who know who he is.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 12:17, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''Keep'''. It's not that bad actually. It just needs to be reworked and those awful red links removed.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 16:45, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#This is-a bad. {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120526095235}}
+
#{{Delete}} Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:30 28-Jul-15</small>
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=1
}}
 
 
==[[Apocalypse]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=5
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#'''Keep'''. Made this a little more encyclopedic, this is a major topic and has it's moments.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 10:23, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
#Vital, maybe rewrite.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 06:43, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#If the lists and redlinks were removed this would be a nice little article. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 06:45, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} For no reason lol. --[[User:SecondChanceForMe|2<small><sup>nd</sup></small> Chance for me]] ''(because I was'' '''banned'''.'')'' [[User talk:SecondChanceForMe|<small>(Say)</small>]] 09:35, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} (Formerly '''Delete'''.) <s>Dumb disclaimer put me in a bad mood to encounter the long lists that followed. Instead, redirect it to [[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]] (though it is being worsened by a newbie today).</s> No longer a gaping sore thanks to Mr-ex777. Could still use an owner and an actual theme. Don't call the reader a wanker in the intro. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:01 24-May-12</small>
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}}And redirect to [[End of Time]]. --{{User:Scofield/sig}} 15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} This is, once again, one of those articles that starts promisingly with a nice photo, nice thumbnail-text, nice first five/six sentences, then comes an ultimately random piece which, somehow, features a celebraty on some part (George Bush is a celebrity right?) and then turns into an endless like list which starts annoying the reader who turns his/hers back to the article and votes for deletion. This is sad. : ( {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|16:55|28|May|2012}}
 
#* In that case, it should only be that long. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:41, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Lists and chuck norris removed.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 13:53, July 29, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by EStop • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit HowTo:Get Expelled from School H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 471 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote A load of poopy. Pupil misbehavior is not comedy, nor is even boasting about it. Spıke Radiomicrophone12:50 11-Jul-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Generic and ineffective ways of attempting to be expelled, all easily nipped in the bud by competent staff. I had to steal a fire engine.--EStop (talk) 07:06, July 13, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pupil misbehavior can be funny; I still remember and chuckle fondly at memories of some of my elementary and junior-high school classmates' antics, and they make great stories to tell at parties many years later. However, this article is just screaming for the author to take another look at Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 21:27, July 12, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I made a few changes to the article. Take another look and see what you think. Simsilikesims (talk) 21:36, July 27, 2015 (UTC)
    Better, but still unsure whether it's worth keeping. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 00:02, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

edit Borat Sagdiyev H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 392 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Seems to be a simple retelling of the jokes from Borat's film. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:55, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Any author is free to re-create the article after devising an original comedy concept. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:19 14-Jul-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Parody of a parody.--EStop (talk) 08:32, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Bad grammar is overdone. Filmography section fills up my screen. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 06:15, July 23, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I think Sacha Baron Cohen beat you to it writer. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:41, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Redirect H T D

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 392 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The subject is not notable; the article is boring. Created by someone for whom the encyclopedic style clearly was a disadvantage. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:58, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The article takes a concept and tries to pull it in multiple directions. There is no unifying joke but it isn't awful. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. I agree with both Anton and Spike however, abstaining does nothing for the process. I fall on the side of keep because there is potential with the article.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Nominator himself added the current text in June 2013 and I deleted the original listcruft in May 2014. Is this the latest rage-quit à la "I wish to nominate for deletion everything I ever wrote here"? Spıke Radiomicrophone19:26 14-Jul-15
  • Looking at one thing then being drawn into another... subtle mind control is hinted at in the piece but not expanded. There must be potential for a bit of light-conspiracy based, cloak-and-dagger fun if it can be made to work. Have Wikipedia not inadvertently created a new world of secrecy and psycological manipulation with their rediredt concept? Paper/real life redirects, don't Government and the media do it all the time? Parent or child redirects, marketing, relationships, at the office. Happy to have this put in my userspace for a rainy day.--EStop (talk) 09:02, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • This isn't a rage-quite. This isn't a quit at all, actually. You might have noticed that I am not removing any of the articles listed on my userpage. These ones come from the list of my articles I wanted to work on, because they were either incomplete or unfunny, and for these two I thought there wasn't much worth saving.
  • EStop, thanks for the concepts! I'd feel guilty if I forced you to help save this piece (because it is entirely my fault that it it is the way it is), but you gave me ideas and so I'll be rewriting it probably, so if you feel inspired, feel free to have as much fun with it, as you want! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:00, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Okay, great! I'll just finish my Sex change and have a look. Happy to collaborate.--EStop (talk) 20:01, July 16, 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 21:15, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

edit The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 392 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The intro isn't bad; the rest is mediocre to say the least. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:05, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A nice idea, but unfinished. --EStop (talk) 12:33, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The intro advances a good comedy concept. The rest needs to be completed, or at least rendered in correct English. Spıke Radiomicrophone19:29 14-Jul-15
Comments

edit SGML H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 256 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Short, stupid and humorless. A stub left unexpanded since 2010. This article should blow itself up. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 11:12, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't see the link between suicide girl and mark up language. Is there a twisted nerd in the house? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:29, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. SuicideGirls seems to be a website of soft-core porno revolving around emo chicks. Blurring it with the markup language is a brilliant concept. I copy-edited the article to clean it up. There is plenty more material at Wikipedia to work from. Keep this for the next twisted nerd to come along. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Have to admit, the syntax example made me chuckle. It needs work but I like the idea of coding an Emo chick. The toenail and fingernail fonts would default to black.--EStop (talk) 13:05, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
  • Renamed. Used to be Suicide Girl Markup Language, but as always, the punch line should not be the page title, but rather the term that a reader will actually look for. Spıke Radiomicrophone04:41 22-Jul-15

edit Niggle H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 126 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, and there's a better version here. The preceding unsigned comment was added by EpicWinner (talk • contribs)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Offensive while nowhere on the road to funny. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:15 25-Jul-15
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Unfunny offensive duplicruft. (Vote button is missing, so voting manually). --TotalCuddles02 (talk) 12:20, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Racism without decent humor. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 17:17, July 26, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 12:24, July 29, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The alternative that nominator points to is not the same thing; if it were, the rules invite the nominator to revert the article to its best version. In this case, let's not even redirect, just make it go away. Spıke Radiomicrophone21:15 25-Jul-15

edit I Think Satan Likes Your Mom H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 126 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This doesn't really serve a purpose, other than (at this point, tired-out) Bush-bashing.--EpicWinner (talk) 21:27, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A lot of work has gone into this 2006 contest entry. Unfortunately, the result is not a satire of anything real that a reader might look up, but an article about an archetypal (but nonexistent) heavy-metal band. Making George W. Bush the backbone of the comedy strategy is both irrelevant and obsolete. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Google search comes only to us, unless this entire article is a way of feeding traffic to netizen It's Lym. Spıke Radiomicrophone13:39 26-Jul-15

edit Exploding Testicles H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 58 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Condition affects "from 0% to 100% of the population." In other words, an essay from 2006 about how much fun it is writing about testicles. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:30 28-Jul-15
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. With some expansion, more pictures, and a bit of cleanup, I feel this could actually be very good. Unlike many articles which I see wind up on VFD, this one actually tries to sound encyclopedic, for one. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:54, July 28, 2015 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects