Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps)
({{VFDn|Cutters}})
 
(8,429 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Johnson County, Kansas}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
==[[ARTICLENAMEHERE]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=10:31, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:31 12-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Small town Kansas Kruft. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:01 24-Aug-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
Don't mingle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Office etiquette}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=03:02, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
==[[Republic of Lee Kingdom]]==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=00:57, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that '''this is a humor wiki'''. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:02 13-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} One liners. Not good.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I believe this is about Singapore, which already has an article to itself. Also, so many redlinks and it just looks very unfunny. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:58 17-Aug-14</small>
  +
:I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Talk Talk]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Johnny Gay}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=23:40, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=01:45, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:45 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not very funny and not notable enough. <s>I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1ylkdldauc this YouTube video].</s> {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#::But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:08 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Thanks for the meme-ory. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Talking shit about a band does not make an article funny. In fact, it makes you look stupid. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} Am always happy to vote against an article whose brand of humor is, "Look at me! I don't know what I'm talking about!" Band members include "The Other Guy" and "Another Guy" and not until Sec. 2 does anything relate to the actual band, and even then a quote is attributed to "some snobby assed music journalist." Lame. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[NASDAQ]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Lahore}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=22:15, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
# {{keep}} I fixed this up a bit, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Could be funny with a coordinated attack. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:36, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Rewritten.}} I fixed it up a bit more. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:12 29-May-12</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I don't like this. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
|comments=
 
* Having seen stock traders before, I would have to say that the tuxedo stereotype really adds flavor to this article! Speaking of which, have we an article about [[necktie]]s? --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:There's [[Clip-on tie]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:31 29-May-12</small>
 
*::Kay. There's also [[Bow tie]]. I'll make a disambiguation page. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
}}
 
   
==[[Malcolm Glazer]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=11:05, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=19:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is about someone real and notable (the owner of the Manchester United football club). It has a theme (map him onto the ''Lord of the Rings''). It has a fun shoop. What it lacks is explanation about '''why''' he relates to ''Lord of the Rings''--it is random allegory but humor is not far away. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 29-May-12</small>
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete|I piss on this article}} And on the person responsible for it's cration. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
#No funny. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:38 19-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Mesherschmit Vs. Spitfire]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Nunavut}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=04:02, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=00:26, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
[[File:ATT00071.jpg|thumb|right|100px]]
+
#{{Delete}} Deliberately stupid articles are, well, stupid. And not entertaining. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:26 20-Aug-14</small>
#This is pure nonesense. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} It's a pretty original idea for a theme (it's written like an essay) but it's executed awfully, and the end result is little humour. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 08:15, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} The initial shoop is entertaining but will live on elsewhere. Misspelling in page name; Brits with bad teeth and small penises. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:54 29-May-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} First-person stream-of-consciousness unfunny drivel. [[User:Captain gull|Captain gull]] ([[User talk:Captain gull|talk]]) 01:09, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
#Yeah, I really did like the picture. Everything else is trash.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529123127}}
+
#{{Delete}} To make it stay it needs to improve but do we have any contributors that know this place??--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:57, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
#Meshershit Vs. Shitfire. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:17, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Ok, now why the ''Hell'' didn't ''I'' think of that? You bastard.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529213710}}
 
#::Lol--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 22:05, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Diet Cola]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=03:59, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=6
 
|delete=
 
#Da fuq? {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#It is garbage with no concept and a single image with a ''non sequitur'' caption. And it was written by two ten-year-olds who just ate a bunch of taffy. That's ''what the fuq''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071441}}
 
# I hate those articles saying "That food/drink is evil!"--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:09, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, Mr-ex777, that is about all this article says. A health scare needs to be done cleverly. I have grabbed the Hebrew Coke can for [[Diet Coke]], which itself is in sad shape. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 29-May-12</small>
 
#Reads like vandalism. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{burninate}} Too much crass, sex, and randomness. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:38, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*It actually improves near the end after the earlier nonsense. Don't know whether to see if go or not. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:37, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I gave it another re-read, to the end, and I don't see it. Less navelism there but still nothing but Beavis-and-Butthead "humor." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:15 22-Aug-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Dolphin uprising}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see [[Emu War]] and [[Animals with feet war with animals with no feet]]. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of {{U|Sunoco}} is a waste of time, except to key us to [[:Category:Silly wars]], where other VFD fodder may be found. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 25-Aug-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
# {{delete|Huff, then turn into a content fork.}} This is currently the top article on [[Special:LongPages]], at 394,674 bytes. I suggest splitting it into separate articles by season, namely "Lost (TV series)/Season #". --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Is the material worth preserving, or not? If so, you hardly need our vote to organize it better. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:27 29-May-12</small>
 
#::{{Delete|Another reason to huff:}} It's illogical to have a subpage of [[Lost (TV series)|a redirect]]. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:::That's not a reason at all. It's very easy to change the title of the subpage so it's no longer a subpage of a redirect but of the page being redirected to. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''00:31, 30 May 2012''</small>
 
#::::Have we created a guide for choosing the best title for your work? If not, I can start one. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 01:55, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
#[[Supernatural (TV series)|Huff outright]]. Just like <<< that page, this one is bloated, tedious splooge.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071010}}
 
#Since Qzekrom brought this nom here more or less pointlessly, I am going to one-up him and vote to actually kill it a la Bizzee. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 19:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Pointless rambling. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Convinced by BB, below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:09 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment|Abstain.}} Am not sure that this or any article with satirical renditions of hour-long TV shows from 2004 is not funny to some niche audience, no matter how tedious they are (the parodies, not the audience), and this is why I also abstain from bandcruft, gamecruft, and fightcruft. Surely Star Trek, from about 1970, is doted on comparably and everyone approves. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:52 29-May-12</small>
+
*New Uncyclopedian {{U|SamTheAwesome}} has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new [[The Great Whale Invasion]] (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:08 21-Aug-14</small>
*:I watched every last episode of Lost, and I can tell you that I personally do not find anything the least bit funny about this concentrated pile of Fail. As for Star Trek, I feel rather lukewarm towards it and its spin-offs. However, if there were a Star Trek article that was 400 kB long, and was as comparatively unfunny, I'd vote to kill that thing with nukes.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529215646}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Horizon]]==
+
== {{VFDn|United Socialist States of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=22:21, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:21 21-Aug-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
|keep=#Most of this seems more than acceptable content. Why are you nomming this? {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''14:03, 28 May 2012''</small>
+
|keep=
#This isn't bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 14:11, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
|delnumber=2
+
#:One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:14 25-Aug-14</small>
|delete=#{{Delete}} You have got to be joking.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
#I've seen so many shit pages today, I'm kinda on He.Will.Kill's side on this one.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529070529}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*{{Comment}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_in_the_USSA], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*::Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:12 22-Aug-14</small>
  +
*I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Niggas in Paris]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Brian Cowen}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=5
+
{{VFDt|time=20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#Hey bro, don't be hatin' on my homie's sweet page, yo. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''13:56, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#'''Keep'''. I chuckled. Good enough. Spike can't tell me what's funny. -{{User:Optimuschris/sig}}<small><small>16:12, 28 May</small></small>
 
#Prolly as an appropriate article for the song as you can ever get. And it repeats itself because that's the joke. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 00:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} That shit cray. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 00:55, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Feature!--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 12:57, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{Delete}} It repeats itself. How is that funny?--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I have the answer. It's not. {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|13:28|28|May|2012}}
+
#{{Delete}} Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Let's hear it again!}} No, let's not. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 28-May-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since {{U|Dwight K Shrute}} finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:45 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Constitution (Games)]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Cutters}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=23:43, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=5
#{{Keep}} "Constitution" is the stamina-like attribute of characters in role-playing games. Word play, such as "constitution" as the opposite of "prostitution," is a fine humor form we rarely see. This article unfortunately spreads a small amount of material very thin, but it's about something real, is intelligent, and it has an idea what it wants to achieve. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:24 27-May-12</small>
 
#'''Keep.''' It needs some work, like maybe an image or two, but it's promising. {{User:GEORGIEGIBBONS/sig}} 19:20, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Not bad enough.}} {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''12:27, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
|delnumber=2
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} The article was just.... I don't really know how to put it in words. It's bad, but as I read one, it got worst. It had a way of explaining itself, and it gets worse because it just puts some random stuff that's no sense and just very random and immature. If goes off topic more than once, and I honesty believe thaey were just putting stuff there just for the hell of it. It was so random and illogical, my brain actually felt really bad after trying to comprehend what the article is trying to say. I also highly doubt the subject that its talking about even exist (and if it does then it was not made by a intelligent person, and I'm not just saying that.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Disturbing, in a not-funny way. Also simply not funny {{User:Sannse/Sig}} 23:43, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
#This is pretty bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 13:44, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Quickly! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 23:57, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} This is a difficult topic to make funny to begin with, and it is a clearly failed attempt. No surprise. [[User:Phrank Psinatra|Phrank Psinatra]] ([[User talk:Phrank Psinatra|Talk]]) 04:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
*@SPIKE- That could work if it wasn't written so randomly.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|Shit.}} [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 13:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
*:Now we're down to quibbles. (Get started! I already saved one today.) I suggest a section listing famous personalities with high (or low) Constitution ratings (who bare all on the cinema: constitution/prostitution) with the implications for the D&D cards of each. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 27-May-12</small>
+
#<s>{{Delete}} and redirect to [[Emo]]. [[User:Captain gull|Captain gull]] ([[User talk:Captain gull|talk]]) 00:59, August 27, 2014 (UTC)</s>
*:I dumped some new ideas into it and scrubbed the old D&D-cruft. But the result just doesn't hang together. Someone else should take a turn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:01 28-May-12</small>
+
#{{Kill}} Not funny, put it in the landfill. {{User:Newman66/sig}} 13:08, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
----
+
|keepnumber=4
*Previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive260#Constitution_.28Games.29|VFD'd]], Jan'12; 0-3 Delete; kept by Lyrithya citing "apathy." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:35 27-May-12</small>
+
|keep=
*Better title would be [[Constitution (gaming)]] but is protected to Admins due to past vandalism. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:38 27-May-12</small>
+
#{{KEEP}} I don't think this is that bad, I would possible remove the slightly graphic picture, but other than that I think it's fine --{{User:Steveyt0/sig}} 03:05, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Keep}} The Intro and one of the illustrations is downright creepy — and previews some individual horror writing that has no comedy hook at all. The old version (see '''Comments''') is better, but the current initial illustration is better. Will merge. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 27-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Spike made it better. I like the line about Emo Hitler's dog ignoring him because usually it's the dog trying to get the human's attention. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 00:28, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Keep}} I admit it's keep-worthy now. {{User:Captain gull/Sig}} 05:10, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=*[{{fullurl:Cutters|oldid=1309905}} This] is the last version that was entirely the [[User:Pocketthesaurus|original author]]'s work, and it may be better than the current one. Or it may not. I'm not that fond of either, but I thought I should drop this here anyway as I think the large number of mostly IP edits has not done any good. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 04:07, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
**I think that one is better, but I still see it as a pretty straight write-up of what people think about cutting, rather than a humorous twist on it. Hav a look at the second paragraph of the section headed "A few simple ways to avoid cutting", maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see a single joke in there. Much of the rest is the same -- {{User:Sannse/Sig}} 21:43, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
**:Again, I've merged the various versions; be sure you are evaluating the current ("our best" version). A piece of the text you highlight (now a separate bullet), about tension build-up in younger teens (linked to [[Emo]]) is too subtle and I just cut it out. But I do see jokes in there, mostly the "humor of repetition" — especially when the author repeats "compulsive behaviours." It does read like a spork of a serious treatise, with not our best comedy applied to it, but not deleteworthy. Ridiculing various neuroses is fair game. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:59 27-Aug-14</small>
  +
*I have no opinion, but I want to demonstrate that I am showing an interest. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:33 pm 28 Aug 2014}}
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Tank Abbot]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Dan Kwon}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=09:52, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDg|time=09:44, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#'''Keep'''. Weaker stuff - amusing for those who know who he is.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 12:17, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''Keep'''. It's not that bad actually. It just needs to be reworked and those awful red links removed.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 16:45, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#This is-a bad. {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120526095235}}
+
#{{Delete}} An interesting and deeply philosophical tale about a guy named Dan Kwon. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:44, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The page is protected, so could anyone, please, add the VFD tag to it for me? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:44, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*'''Administratively deleted.''' A page containing only "I don't know who Dan Kwon is but I have arbitrarily decided that he sucks balls" (hint: Wikipedia doesn't know either) is not an Uncyclopedia article. Declares itself an official Uncyclopedia In-Joke, but is not in the official list. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
**This was by the same author as [[Fisher Price]], which is what makes it a bit of Uncyc history. And honestly I think it's a funnier article than [[Fisher Price]]. It's an in-joke in as much as you need to be in on the joke to know why it's a joke. And this is not a vote for or against, but an explanation. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:31 pm 28 Aug 2014}}
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Apocalypse]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Dan Kwanzaa}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=5
+
{{VFDt|time=09:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#'''Keep'''. Made this a little more encyclopedic, this is a major topic and has it's moments.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 10:23, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Vital, maybe rewrite.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 06:43, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#If the lists and redlinks were removed this would be a nice little article. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 06:45, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} For no reason lol. --[[User:SecondChanceForMe|2<small><sup>nd</sup></small> Chance for me]] ''(because I was'' '''banned'''.'')'' [[User talk:SecondChanceForMe|<small>(Say)</small>]] 09:35, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} (Formerly '''Delete'''.) <s>Dumb disclaimer put me in a bad mood to encounter the long lists that followed. Instead, redirect it to [[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]] (though it is being worsened by a newbie today).</s> No longer a gaping sore thanks to Mr-ex777. Could still use an owner and an actual theme. Don't call the reader a wanker in the intro. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:01 24-May-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{Delete}}And redirect to [[End of Time]]. --{{User:Scofield/sig}} 15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This is, once again, one of those articles that starts promisingly with a nice photo, nice thumbnail-text, nice first five/six sentences, then comes an ultimately random piece which, somehow, features a celebraty on some part (George Bush is a celebrity right?) and then turns into an endless like list which starts annoying the reader who turns his/hers back to the article and votes for deletion. This is sad. : ( {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|16:55|28|May|2012}}
+
#I don't know what this article talks about, but I have arbitrarily decided - {{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
#* In that case, it should only be that long. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:41, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} A copycat article of the above. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Lists and chuck norris removed.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|The Only Emo Holiday: National Emo Day}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=09:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=2
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Where is the humor? {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A pointless article about a nonexistent thing; possibly written to ridicule but not to amuse. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:08 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
== {{VFDn|UnPoetia:Peter Lorre is a Zombie}} ==
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
{{VFDt|time=09:54, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Anon tries to make an article about Peter Lorre, but creates a poem instead. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 09:54, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} King of the website memes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:10 28-Aug-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 14:33, August 28, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Johnson County, Kansas H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 388 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. Spıke ¬ 10:31 12-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Small town Kansas Kruft. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. Rocketsled (talk) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. Spıke ¬ 15:01 24-Aug-14

edit Office etiquette H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 371 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that this is a humor wiki. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 03:02 13-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. ConCass2 (talk) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. One liners. Not good.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. Rocketsled (talk) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. Spıke ¬ 11:58 17-Aug-14
I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. ConCass2 (talk) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)

edit Johnny Gay H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 252 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. Spıke ¬ 01:45 18-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not very funny and not notable enough. I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to this YouTube video. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. Spıke ¬ 14:08 18-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Thanks for the meme-ory. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Lahore H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 219 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. Spıke ¬ 11:38 19-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Nunavut H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 206 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Deliberately stupid articles are, well, stupid. And not entertaining. Spıke ¬ 00:26 20-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. It's a pretty original idea for a theme (it's written like an essay) but it's executed awfully, and the end result is little humour. ConCass2 (talk) 08:15, August 23, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. First-person stream-of-consciousness unfunny drivel. Captain gull (talk) 01:09, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. To make it stay it needs to improve but do we have any contributors that know this place??--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:57, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It actually improves near the end after the earlier nonsense. Don't know whether to see if go or not. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:37, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I gave it another re-read, to the end, and I don't see it. Less navelism there but still nothing but Beavis-and-Butthead "humor." Spıke ¬ 13:15 22-Aug-14

edit Dolphin uprising H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 169 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see Emu War and Animals with feet war with animals with no feet. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of Sunoco is a waste of time, except to key us to Category:Silly wars, where other VFD fodder may be found. Spıke ¬ 12:09 25-Aug-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • New Uncyclopedian SamTheAwesome has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new The Great Whale Invasion (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. Spıke ¬ 13:08 21-Aug-14

edit United Socialist States of America H T D Survivor

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 160 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. Spıke ¬ 22:21 21-Aug-14
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. ConCass2 (talk) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
    One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) Spıke ¬ 12:14 25-Aug-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. [1], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. Spıke ¬ 13:12 22-Aug-14
  • I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. ConCass2 (talk) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

edit Brian Cowen H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 89 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. ConCass2 (talk) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since Dwight K Shrute finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. Spıke ¬ 21:45 24-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Cutters H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 62 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Disturbing, in a not-funny way. Also simply not funny sannse@Wikia (talk) 23:43, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Quickly! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 23:57, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is a difficult topic to make funny to begin with, and it is a clearly failed attempt. No surprise. Phrank Psinatra (Talk) 04:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Shit. ConCass2 (talk) 13:11, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. and redirect to Emo. Captain gull (talk) 00:59, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Symbol kill vote Kill. Not funny, put it in the landfill. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:08, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (4)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I don't think this is that bad, I would possible remove the slightly graphic picture, but other than that I think it's fine --Steveyt0 (talk) 03:05, August 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. The Intro and one of the illustrations is downright creepy — and previews some individual horror writing that has no comedy hook at all. The old version (see Comments) is better, but the current initial illustration is better. Will merge. Spıke ¬ 13:38 27-Aug-14
  3. Spike made it better. I like the line about Emo Hitler's dog ignoring him because usually it's the dog trying to get the human's attention. Llwy (scold|hover) 00:28, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol keep vote Keep. I admit it's keep-worthy now. Capt. Gull (talk) 05:10, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • This is the last version that was entirely the original author's work, and it may be better than the current one. Or it may not. I'm not that fond of either, but I thought I should drop this here anyway as I think the large number of mostly IP edits has not done any good. Llwy (scold|hover) 04:07, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
    • I think that one is better, but I still see it as a pretty straight write-up of what people think about cutting, rather than a humorous twist on it. Hav a look at the second paragraph of the section headed "A few simple ways to avoid cutting", maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see a single joke in there. Much of the rest is the same -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 21:43, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
      Again, I've merged the various versions; be sure you are evaluating the current ("our best" version). A piece of the text you highlight (now a separate bullet), about tension build-up in younger teens (linked to Emo) is too subtle and I just cut it out. But I do see jokes in there, mostly the "humor of repetition" — especially when the author repeats "compulsive behaviours." It does read like a spork of a serious treatise, with not our best comedy applied to it, but not deleteworthy. Ridiculing various neuroses is fair game. Spıke ¬ 21:59 27-Aug-14
  • I have no opinion, but I want to demonstrate that I am showing an interest.                               Puppy's talk page02:33 pm 28 Aug 2014

edit Dan Kwon H Archive

Score: 1 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 4 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An interesting and deeply philosophical tale about a guy named Dan Kwon. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:44, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The page is protected, so could anyone, please, add the VFD tag to it for me? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:44, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  • Administratively deleted. A page containing only "I don't know who Dan Kwon is but I have arbitrarily decided that he sucks balls" (hint: Wikipedia doesn't know either) is not an Uncyclopedia article. Declares itself an official Uncyclopedia In-Joke, but is not in the official list. Spıke ¬ 12:12 28-Aug-14

edit Dan Kwanzaa H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 4 hours
Delete (2)
  1. I don't know what this article talks about, but I have arbitrarily decided - Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:47, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A copycat article of the above. Spıke ¬ 12:12 28-Aug-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit The Only Emo Holiday: National Emo Day H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 4 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Where is the humor? Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:51, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A pointless article about a nonexistent thing; possibly written to ridicule but not to amuse. Spıke ¬ 12:08 28-Aug-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit UnPoetia:Peter Lorre is a Zombie H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 4 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anon tries to make an article about Peter Lorre, but creates a poem instead. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 09:54, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. King of the website memes. Spıke ¬ 12:10 28-Aug-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects