Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps)
({{VFDn|Ukrainian Nazi Party}}: new section)
 
(10,156 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Chyna}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
==[[ARTICLENAMEHERE]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=23:18, May 7, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=5
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:18 7-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} I gave up after the first sentence. [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] ([[User talk:BrokenKnives|talk]]) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} I'm with [[User:BrokenKnives|BrokenKnives]] on this one. I maybe got a ''little'' further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{For}} A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#:Why? Is the article internet famous? {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't mingle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|A Day at the Barn with Hitler}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=01:55, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
==[[Republic of Lee Kingdom]]==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=00:57, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by {{U|Thetoastman}} in 2006. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:55 10-May-15</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} If it is not original work, it should go.--[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I believe this is about Singapore, which already has an article to itself. Also, so many redlinks and it just looks very unfunny. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:40 10-May-15</small>
  +
*::Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --[[User:EStop|EStop]] ([[User talk:EStop|talk]]) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  +
*:If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:31 25-May-15</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Talk Talk]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Labor Party}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=23:40, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Talking shit about a band does not make an article funny. In fact, it makes you look stupid. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} Am always happy to vote against an article whose brand of humor is, "Look at me! I don't know what I'm talking about!" Band members include "The Other Guy" and "Another Guy" and not until Sec. 2 does anything relate to the actual band, and even then a quote is attributed to "some snobby assed music journalist." Lame. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 29-May-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
==[[NASDAQ]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=22:15, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
# {{keep}} I fixed this up a bit, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Could be funny with a coordinated attack. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:36, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Rewritten.}} I fixed it up a bit more. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:12 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I don't like this. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin {{U|Mnbvcxz}} (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:58 11-May-15</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* Having seen stock traders before, I would have to say that the tuxedo stereotype really adds flavor to this article! Speaking of which, have we an article about [[necktie]]s? --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
*Not to be confused with [[Labour Party (UK)]]. {{User:ScottPat/sig4}} 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
*:There's [[Clip-on tie]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:31 29-May-12</small>
+
*Not to be confused with the Labor Party in Australia either. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:30, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
*::Kay. There's also [[Bow tie]]. I'll make a disambiguation page. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Malcolm Glazer]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Al Qaeda Chicken}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=13:37, May 24, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is about someone real and notable (the owner of the Manchester United football club). It has a theme (map him onto the ''Lord of the Rings''). It has a fun shoop. What it lacks is explanation about '''why''' he relates to ''Lord of the Rings''--it is random allegory but humor is not far away. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete|I piss on this article}} And on the person responsible for it's cration. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:37 24-May-15</small>
#No funny. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Mesherschmit Vs. Spitfire]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=04:02, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
[[File:ATT00071.jpg|thumb|right|100px]]
 
#This is pure nonesense. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} The initial shoop is entertaining but will live on elsewhere. Misspelling in page name; Brits with bad teeth and small penises. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:54 29-May-12</small>
 
#Yeah, I really did like the picture. Everything else is trash.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529123127}}
 
#Meshershit Vs. Shitfire. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:17, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Ok, now why the ''Hell'' didn't ''I'' think of that? You bastard.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529213710}}
 
#::Lol--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 22:05, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
* On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual [[KFC]] article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Diet Cola]]==
+
== {{VFDn|What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=03:59, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=13:41, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=2
|delnumber=6
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Da fuq? {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} A chatty article about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:41 25-May-15</small>
#It is garbage with no concept and a single image with a ''non sequitur'' caption. And it was written by two ten-year-olds who just ate a bunch of taffy. That's ''what the fuq''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071441}}
+
#{{Delete}} If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
# I hate those articles saying "That food/drink is evil!"--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:09, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, Mr-ex777, that is about all this article says. A health scare needs to be done cleverly. I have grabbed the Hebrew Coke can for [[Diet Coke]], which itself is in sad shape. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 29-May-12</small>
 
#Reads like vandalism. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{burninate}} Too much crass, sex, and randomness. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:38, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
# {{delete|Huff, then turn into a content fork.}} This is currently the top article on [[Special:LongPages]], at 394,674 bytes. I suggest splitting it into separate articles by season, namely "Lost (TV series)/Season #". --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Is the material worth preserving, or not? If so, you hardly need our vote to organize it better. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:27 29-May-12</small>
 
#::{{Delete|Another reason to huff:}} It's illogical to have a subpage of [[Lost (TV series)|a redirect]]. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:::That's not a reason at all. It's very easy to change the title of the subpage so it's no longer a subpage of a redirect but of the page being redirected to. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''00:31, 30 May 2012''</small>
 
#::::Have we created a guide for choosing the best title for your work? If not, I can start one. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 01:55, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
#[[Supernatural (TV series)|Huff outright]]. Just like <<< that page, this one is bloated, tedious splooge.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071010}}
 
#Since Qzekrom brought this nom here more or less pointlessly, I am going to one-up him and vote to actually kill it a la Bizzee. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 19:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Pointless rambling. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Convinced by BB, below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:09 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment|Abstain.}} Am not sure that this or any article with satirical renditions of hour-long TV shows from 2004 is not funny to some niche audience, no matter how tedious they are (the parodies, not the audience), and this is why I also abstain from bandcruft, gamecruft, and fightcruft. Surely Star Trek, from about 1970, is doted on comparably and everyone approves. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:52 29-May-12</small>
 
*:I watched every last episode of Lost, and I can tell you that I personally do not find anything the least bit funny about this concentrated pile of Fail. As for Star Trek, I feel rather lukewarm towards it and its spin-offs. However, if there were a Star Trek article that was 400 kB long, and was as comparatively unfunny, I'd vote to kill that thing with nukes.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529215646}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Horizon]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Hemorrhoid}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=#Most of this seems more than acceptable content. Why are you nomming this? {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''14:03, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#This isn't bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 14:11, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} You have got to be joking.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#I've seen so many shit pages today, I'm kinda on He.Will.Kill's side on this one.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529070529}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
==[[Niggas in Paris]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=5
 
|keep=#Hey bro, don't be hatin' on my homie's sweet page, yo. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''13:56, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#'''Keep'''. I chuckled. Good enough. Spike can't tell me what's funny. -{{User:Optimuschris/sig}}<small><small>16:12, 28 May</small></small>
 
#Prolly as an appropriate article for the song as you can ever get. And it repeats itself because that's the joke. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 00:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} That shit cray. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 00:55, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Feature!--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 12:57, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} It repeats itself. How is that funny?--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have the answer. It's not. {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|13:28|28|May|2012}}
 
#{{Delete|Let's hear it again!}} No, let's not. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 28-May-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Constitution (Games)]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} "Constitution" is the stamina-like attribute of characters in role-playing games. Word play, such as "constitution" as the opposite of "prostitution," is a fine humor form we rarely see. This article unfortunately spreads a small amount of material very thin, but it's about something real, is intelligent, and it has an idea what it wants to achieve. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:24 27-May-12</small>
 
#'''Keep.''' It needs some work, like maybe an image or two, but it's promising. {{User:GEORGIEGIBBONS/sig}} 19:20, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Not bad enough.}} {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''12:27, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} The article was just.... I don't really know how to put it in words. It's bad, but as I read one, it got worst. It had a way of explaining itself, and it gets worse because it just puts some random stuff that's no sense and just very random and immature. If goes off topic more than once, and I honesty believe thaey were just putting stuff there just for the hell of it. It was so random and illogical, my brain actually felt really bad after trying to comprehend what the article is trying to say. I also highly doubt the subject that its talking about even exist (and if it does then it was not made by a intelligent person, and I'm not just saying that.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
#This is pretty bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 13:44, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Admin {{U|Zim ulator}} swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 25-May-15</small>
  +
#:Sorry, I guess the final word does. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:10 25-May-15</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*@SPIKE- That could work if it wasn't written so randomly.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Now we're down to quibbles. (Get started! I already saved one today.) I suggest a section listing famous personalities with high (or low) Constitution ratings (who bare all on the cinema: constitution/prostitution) with the implications for the D&D cards of each. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 27-May-12</small>
 
*:I dumped some new ideas into it and scrubbed the old D&D-cruft. But the result just doesn't hang together. Someone else should take a turn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:01 28-May-12</small>
 
----
 
*Previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive260#Constitution_.28Games.29|VFD'd]], Jan'12; 0-3 Delete; kept by Lyrithya citing "apathy." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:35 27-May-12</small>
 
*Better title would be [[Constitution (gaming)]] but is protected to Admins due to past vandalism. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:38 27-May-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Tank Abbot]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Ukrainian Nazi Party}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=09:52, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=19:48, May 26, 2015 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#'''Keep'''. Weaker stuff - amusing for those who know who he is.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 12:17, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''Keep'''. It's not that bad actually. It just needs to be reworked and those awful red links removed.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 16:45, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#This is-a bad. {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120526095235}}
+
{{Delete}} Nothing comparable on Wikipedia. Twelve different external links. It feels as though author wants me to read all the available evidence to support his point, which still isn't funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:48 26-May-15</small>
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=0
}}
 
 
==[[Apocalypse]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=5
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#'''Keep'''. Made this a little more encyclopedic, this is a major topic and has it's moments.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 10:23, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Vital, maybe rewrite.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 06:43, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#If the lists and redlinks were removed this would be a nice little article. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 06:45, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} For no reason lol. --[[User:SecondChanceForMe|2<small><sup>nd</sup></small> Chance for me]] ''(because I was'' '''banned'''.'')'' [[User talk:SecondChanceForMe|<small>(Say)</small>]] 09:35, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} (Formerly '''Delete'''.) <s>Dumb disclaimer put me in a bad mood to encounter the long lists that followed. Instead, redirect it to [[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]] (though it is being worsened by a newbie today).</s> No longer a gaping sore thanks to Mr-ex777. Could still use an owner and an actual theme. Don't call the reader a wanker in the intro. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:01 24-May-12</small>
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}}And redirect to [[End of Time]]. --{{User:Scofield/sig}} 15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} This is, once again, one of those articles that starts promisingly with a nice photo, nice thumbnail-text, nice first five/six sentences, then comes an ultimately random piece which, somehow, features a celebraty on some part (George Bush is a celebrity right?) and then turns into an endless like list which starts annoying the reader who turns his/hers back to the article and votes for deletion. This is sad. : ( {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|16:55|28|May|2012}}
 
#* In that case, it should only be that long. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:41, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Lists and chuck norris removed.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 19:48, May 26, 2015

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Chyna H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 452 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Chyna is a transsexual stage wrestler who has done porn films. This article goes in a single, predictable direction (down). Spıke Ѧ 23:18 7-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I gave up after the first sentence. BrokenKnives (talk) 17:35, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:16, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. --EStop (talk) 11:19, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm with BrokenKnives on this one. I maybe got a little further in, but quickly glazed over. I can understand the intent given a glance over the accompanying Wikipedia article, but perhaps a totally different approach would have been better. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:48, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol for vote For. A tad hard to delete this, though not a feature as such. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:25, May 13, 2015 (UTC)
    Why? Is the article internet famous? SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 19:00, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
Comments

edit A Day at the Barn with Hitler H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 401 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by Thetoastman in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:55 10-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it is not original work, it should go.--EStop (talk) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
    To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 10-May-15
    Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --EStop (talk) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
    If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 18:31 25-May-15

edit Labor Party H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 389 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin Mnbvcxz (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 11-May-15
Comments

edit Al Qaeda Chicken H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 54 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This 2007 article about something made-up starts with generic quotation and "nobody gives a shit" and descends into horrible typography and listcruft. Clean it up and there would still be nothing there. Spıke Ѧ 13:37 24-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not going to lie, it had some moments that made me chuckle, like some of the chicken preparation steps and the Engrish advertisement. But it commits many small sins, including not only the aforementioned lists, but also the inappropriate use of first-person, capitalization errors, and some frankly stupid parts. Combined with the fact that many people would likely not think to search for this, and I can't justify keeping it. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • On a somewhat unrelated note, the actual KFC article is in an even worse state of disrepair, in my opinion. Just my 2 cents. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:59, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

edit What to do if you open your front door one day and there is a portal to an alternate dimension instead of what you expected to see, which was probably something along the lines of whatever is usually outside your house H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 30 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A chatty article about nothing. Spıke Ѧ 13:41 25-May-15
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If it was written better and actually contained humor, it might have been better located on HowTo. As it stands though, it doesn't really belong anywhere here. It actually comes across as really boring. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:33, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Hemorrhoid H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 21 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. An extremely short (3-paragraph) article filled with nonsense. Only a handful of edits were made, the last dating back to 2013. AFAICT, it's garbage in its purest form and has no reason to exist. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 22:28, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Admin Zim ulator swings and misses in 2013. My god, it has nothing that even relates to hemorrhoids. Spıke Ѧ 23:04 25-May-15
    Sorry, I guess the final word does. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 25-May-15
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Ukrainian Nazi Party H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 0 hours
Delete (1)

Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing comparable on Wikipedia. Twelve different external links. It feels as though author wants me to read all the available evidence to support his point, which still isn't funny. Spıke Ѧ 19:48 26-May-15

Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects