Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps)
(to archive)
 
(7,308 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Wasp}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
==[[ARTICLENAMEHERE]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=2
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} ''"War with the Hornet(1500-2009) (The only section worth reading in this shitty article)"'' sums it up nicely. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Photo-less article's theme is dog turds, then the article itself, bickering with itself. I presume that, in 2007, the Rabbi was still amused at being an author and not so experienced as to do it right. Includes memes (Dubya? WMD?) and nonsense numbers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 7-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#Rabbi Techno's original seems fine, and held my interest enough to actually read the whole thing. Could use work and pictures though. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 20:23 7-4-14
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't mingle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Welsh Congo}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
 
==[[Republic of Lee Kingdom]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=00:57, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I believe this is about Singapore, which already has an article to itself. Also, so many redlinks and it just looks very unfunny. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic and random. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Welsh version of the Belgian (''et al.'') Congo could be fun if written by someone who knew something about Wales (other than its native translation) and about Africa. I've cleared up the worst here but it still lacks a reason to exist. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:11 7-Apr-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Talk Talk]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Alexander Graham Bell}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=23:40, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Talking shit about a band does not make an article funny. In fact, it makes you look stupid. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Random. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Am always happy to vote against an article whose brand of humor is, "Look at me! I don't know what I'm talking about!" Band members include "The Other Guy" and "Another Guy" and not until Sec. 2 does anything relate to the actual band, and even then a quote is attributed to "some snobby assed music journalist." Lame. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 29-May-12</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Do something with it, other than this randomness loosely bound to "Georg Dobbeyer Büch" (sadly, only a piped link to the usual Bush article). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:14 7-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#The original isn't horribly bad. Or it can be deleted and redirected to [[Homophone]], the article that almost turned me gay. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 20:25 7-4-14
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[NASDAQ]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Alternate universe}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=22:15, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A main page that tries to be exactly the opposite of our main page. It's not very funny or even consistent in what it does ("Vote for featured image" instead of "Vote for the image with the worst quality", for example). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Lame attempts at humor through rote translation of our main pages should use Babel instead. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 14-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keepnumber=2
|keep=
+
|keep=#{{Keep}} I like it. Simple and effective. For someone like me before I joined Uncyc this kind of page just made me laugh because it just ridicules the idea of an encyclopedia such as wikipedia. Only on Uncyclopedia can you get this. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 15:52, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
# {{keep}} I fixed this up a bit, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Could be funny with a coordinated attack. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:36, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#Made me laugh, cry, salivate, and then hiccup. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 18:50 20-4-14
#{{Keep|Rewritten.}} I fixed it up a bit more. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:12 29-May-12</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I don't like this. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
* Having seen stock traders before, I would have to say that the tuxedo stereotype really adds flavor to this article! Speaking of which, have we an article about [[necktie]]s? --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:There's [[Clip-on tie]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:31 29-May-12</small>
 
*::Kay. There's also [[Bow tie]]. I'll make a disambiguation page. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Malcolm Glazer]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Lightning}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is about someone real and notable (the owner of the Manchester United football club). It has a theme (map him onto the ''Lord of the Rings''). It has a fun shoop. What it lacks is explanation about '''why''' he relates to ''Lord of the Rings''--it is random allegory but humor is not far away. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete|I piss on this article}} And on the person responsible for it's cration. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Memish and lacks humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#No funny. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|"Has been scientifically proven."}} Gassy phrases like this, and gassy [[UNQUOTE|initial quotations]], will drive away the reader even before the Intro ends and the reader finds nothing left but dumb lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:29 21-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Mesherschmit Vs. Spitfire]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Adjective}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=04:02, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} First person. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete|"You are a FUCKING asshole."}} Stand-up comedy by an unfunny person. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:27 21-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
[[File:ATT00071.jpg|thumb|right|100px]]
 
#This is pure nonesense. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} The initial shoop is entertaining but will live on elsewhere. Misspelling in page name; Brits with bad teeth and small penises. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:54 29-May-12</small>
 
#Yeah, I really did like the picture. Everything else is trash.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529123127}}
 
#Meshershit Vs. Shitfire. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:17, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Ok, now why the ''Hell'' didn't ''I'' think of that? You bastard.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529213710}}
 
#::Lol--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 22:05, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Diet Cola]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Admiral Ozzel}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=03:59, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Some good concepts however poorly written and mainly quotes. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The surfeit of quotes is easily fixable with a switchblade. The lack of humor, regarding a minor character in the ''Star Wars'' series, is not. Parents are "Incompetent Peep and Incompetent Person," and that is as close to funny as it gets. Confusion with ''Star Trek'' could be a theme but author takes it nowhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:30 22-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=6
+
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Norbit}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#Da fuq? {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Not funny, slightly memish and poorly written. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#It is garbage with no concept and a single image with a ''non sequitur'' caption. And it was written by two ten-year-olds who just ate a bunch of taffy. That's ''what the fuq''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071441}}
+
|keepnumber=1
# I hate those articles saying "That food/drink is evil!"--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:09, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keep=
#{{Delete}} Yes, Mr-ex777, that is about all this article says. A health scare needs to be done cleverly. I have grabbed the Hebrew Coke can for [[Diet Coke]], which itself is in sad shape. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 29-May-12</small>
+
#{{Keep}} Read the outrageous plot at [[WP:Norbit#Plot]]. This blax-self-ploitation flick must get serviced by Uncyclopedia. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 21-Apr-14</small>
#Reads like vandalism. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#:And now has been. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:31 22-Apr-14</small>
#{{burninate}} Too much crass, sex, and randomness. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:38, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Taking candy from strangers}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Random. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A thoroughly tedious read, about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:02 21-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Adolf Hilter}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDg|time=10:02, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
# {{delete|Huff, then turn into a content fork.}} This is currently the top article on [[Special:LongPages]], at 394,674 bytes. I suggest splitting it into separate articles by season, namely "Lost (TV series)/Season #". --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Of all the Monty Python sketches out there "Mr. Hilter in England" is one of the greatest however this article does not give it justice at all. It uses unoriginal comedy from the sketch and fills the rest in with memes. If re-written, needs a re-write which honours Monty Python by having Mr. Hilter on an encyclopedia but is actually funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:02, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#:Is the material worth preserving, or not? If so, you hardly need our vote to organize it better. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:27 29-May-12</small>
+
#That's our hitler page? I've never looked at it. Gas it and then redirect to one of the better pages (we can't leave a red link where hitler used to be). [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 12:25 21=4=14
#::{{Delete|Another reason to huff:}} It's illogical to have a subpage of [[Lost (TV series)|a redirect]]. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#:Actually Al, this feature here is our [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler page]]. Read the title of the VFD page again and if you haven't seen the sketch I'd suggest watching it! {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 12:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#:::That's not a reason at all. It's very easy to change the title of the subpage so it's no longer a subpage of a redirect but of the page being redirected to. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''00:31, 30 May 2012''</small>
+
#{{Delete}} In fact, we don't need an article that simply tries in vain to out-Python Monty Python. I agree that all of the humor here is either unoriginal or not humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:03 21-Apr-14</small>
#::::Have we created a guide for choosing the best title for your work? If not, I can start one. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 01:55, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
+
#'''Delete''' --{{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 17:17, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#[[Supernatural (TV series)|Huff outright]]. Just like <<< that page, this one is bloated, tedious splooge.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071010}}
+
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:31, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
#Since Qzekrom brought this nom here more or less pointlessly, I am going to one-up him and vote to actually kill it a la Bizzee. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 19:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
#Pointless rambling. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keep=
#{{Delete}} Convinced by BB, below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:09 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*{{Comment|Abstain.}} Am not sure that this or any article with satirical renditions of hour-long TV shows from 2004 is not funny to some niche audience, no matter how tedious they are (the parodies, not the audience), and this is why I also abstain from bandcruft, gamecruft, and fightcruft. Surely Star Trek, from about 1970, is doted on comparably and everyone approves. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:52 29-May-12</small>
 
*:I watched every last episode of Lost, and I can tell you that I personally do not find anything the least bit funny about this concentrated pile of Fail. As for Star Trek, I feel rather lukewarm towards it and its spin-offs. However, if there were a Star Trek article that was 400 kB long, and was as comparatively unfunny, I'd vote to kill that thing with nukes.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529215646}}
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Horizon]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Evil Illuminati Adolf Hitler Clone Society}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#Most of this seems more than acceptable content. Why are you nomming this? {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''14:03, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#This isn't bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 14:11, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{Delete}} You have got to be joking.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#I've seen so many shit pages today, I'm kinda on He.Will.Kill's side on this one.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529070529}}
+
#{{Delete}} Poorly written, awful and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} 2006-cruft; a Wacky Organization full of memes and devoid of humor. Repeated references to "Noam Particular" are and always have been red-links, with or without the middle name. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:28 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Niggas in Paris]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Adult}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=5
+
{{VFDt|time=10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#Hey bro, don't be hatin' on my homie's sweet page, yo. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''13:56, 28 May 2012''</small>
+
|delnumber=2
#'''Keep'''. I chuckled. Good enough. Spike can't tell me what's funny. -{{User:Optimuschris/sig}}<small><small>16:12, 28 May</small></small>
+
|delete=
#Prolly as an appropriate article for the song as you can ever get. And it repeats itself because that's the joke. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 00:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Listcruft and mainly images near end. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Keep}} That shit cray. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 00:55, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Promising intro. I deleted the picture-book and other cruft. What is left is two gender-based tedious lists revolving around puberty and sex organs. Delete that and there would be almost nothing left. It ought to be saved, but there really is nothing funny about adulthood. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:36 22-Apr-14</small>
#Feature!--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 12:57, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
|delnumber=3
+
|keep=
|delete=#{{Delete}} It repeats itself. How is that funny?--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have the answer. It's not. {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|13:28|28|May|2012}}
 
#{{Delete|Let's hear it again!}} No, let's not. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 28-May-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
#I deleted the listcruft, and added some text. Check it out and see what you think. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 04:38, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Constitution (Games)]]==
+
== {{VFDn|That time I was plundered in the ass by a Viking during my voyage to a retirement villa}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=3
+
{{VFDt|time=12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} "Constitution" is the stamina-like attribute of characters in role-playing games. Word play, such as "constitution" as the opposite of "prostitution," is a fine humor form we rarely see. This article unfortunately spreads a small amount of material very thin, but it's about something real, is intelligent, and it has an idea what it wants to achieve. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:24 27-May-12</small>
 
#'''Keep.''' It needs some work, like maybe an image or two, but it's promising. {{User:GEORGIEGIBBONS/sig}} 19:20, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Not bad enough.}} {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''12:27, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} The article was just.... I don't really know how to put it in words. It's bad, but as I read one, it got worst. It had a way of explaining itself, and it gets worse because it just puts some random stuff that's no sense and just very random and immature. If goes off topic more than once, and I honesty believe thaey were just putting stuff there just for the hell of it. It was so random and illogical, my brain actually felt really bad after trying to comprehend what the article is trying to say. I also highly doubt the subject that its talking about even exist (and if it does then it was not made by a intelligent person, and I'm not just saying that.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} The title is promising, but the article isn't. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
#This is pretty bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 13:44, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:22 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*@SPIKE- That could work if it wasn't written so randomly.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Now we're down to quibbles. (Get started! I already saved one today.) I suggest a section listing famous personalities with high (or low) Constitution ratings (who bare all on the cinema: constitution/prostitution) with the implications for the D&D cards of each. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 27-May-12</small>
 
*:I dumped some new ideas into it and scrubbed the old D&D-cruft. But the result just doesn't hang together. Someone else should take a turn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:01 28-May-12</small>
 
----
 
*Previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive260#Constitution_.28Games.29|VFD'd]], Jan'12; 0-3 Delete; kept by Lyrithya citing "apathy." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:35 27-May-12</small>
 
*Better title would be [[Constitution (gaming)]] but is protected to Admins due to past vandalism. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:38 27-May-12</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Tank Abbot]]==
+
== {{VFDn|That time NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE during my sojourn on the internet}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=09:52, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
+
{{VFDt|time=12:23, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#'''Keep'''. Weaker stuff - amusing for those who know who he is.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 12:17, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''Keep'''. It's not that bad actually. It just needs to be reworked and those awful red links removed.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 16:45, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#This is-a bad. {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120526095235}}
+
#{{Delete}} This one is worse; provocation of black readers with utterly no comedy payback. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
#<s>Actually, the concept of this page is explained well [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive228#That_time_NIGGERS_STOLE_MY_PAGE_during_my_sojourn_on_the_internet|here]]. But with the original [[NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE]] article deleted, it doesn't really make sense. Sorry, Al. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:35, April 22, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=
  +
#The page is one of the most anti-racist pages we have here on uncy. In it's 2011 VFD attempt, in which it was [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive228#That_time_NIGGERS_STOLE_MY_PAGE_during_my_sojourn_on_the_internet saved by a vote of -6], some people understood that. I've just added more to make it clearer. The illustration, by the way, is a white man dressed up in blackface making fun of another white man dressed up in blackface. The links on the page take people to some of the original writing, but the page stands alone in explanation as a guy typing in his mother's basement. I'll add more to it later. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 13:15 22-4-14
  +
#With a link to the original page and more additions, it seems good enough to be kept. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:33, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Apocalypse]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Patch Adams}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=5
+
{{VFDt|time=13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
#'''Keep'''. Made this a little more encyclopedic, this is a major topic and has it's moments.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 10:23, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Vital, maybe rewrite.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 06:43, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#If the lists and redlinks were removed this would be a nice little article. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 06:45, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} For no reason lol. --[[User:SecondChanceForMe|2<small><sup>nd</sup></small> Chance for me]] ''(because I was'' '''banned'''.'')'' [[User talk:SecondChanceForMe|<small>(Say)</small>]] 09:35, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} (Formerly '''Delete'''.) <s>Dumb disclaimer put me in a bad mood to encounter the long lists that followed. Instead, redirect it to [[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]] (though it is being worsened by a newbie today).</s> No longer a gaping sore thanks to Mr-ex777. Could still use an owner and an actual theme. Don't call the reader a wanker in the intro. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:01 24-May-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{Delete}}And redirect to [[End of Time]]. --{{User:Scofield/sig}} 15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} This is, once again, one of those articles that starts promisingly with a nice photo, nice thumbnail-text, nice first five/six sentences, then comes an ultimately random piece which, somehow, features a celebraty on some part (George Bush is a celebrity right?) and then turns into an endless like list which starts annoying the reader who turns his/hers back to the article and votes for deletion. This is sad. : ( {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|16:55|28|May|2012}}
+
#{{Delete}} There are many reasons for this nomination, and one of this, that many people agree with, is that if it was written by an anonymous editor, Patch Adams would probably be deleted immediately after its creation. I don't think Uncyclopedia benefits from such articles. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
#* In that case, it should only be that long. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:41, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Not an Uncyclopedia article. Also: not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:25 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#Not my favorite but many people love it for reasons unknown, and the concept was well explained somewhere. So for posterity I will hold my nose and vote to keep. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 13:22 22-4-14
  +
#:The concept doesn't change the fact that it is short and not extremely funny. Plus, as [[Uncyclopedia:VFH/Patcher Adams|Puppy once explained]], the image doesn't go well with the article. Even if the concept is clever, it will still be short and not extremely funny. Plus, the image still won't fit in the article. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:26, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Lists and chuck norris removed.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|Fuk u americkan pigs}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=11:51, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=3
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
+
#{{Delete}} A dialogue between an anonymous editor and {{u|Happytimes}}. I don't think it belongs to the main space. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:51, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
#{{Delete}} Indeed it doesn't. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:42 23-Apr-14</small>
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
#{{Delete}} Navelism/Vanity. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 16:24, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
|keepnumber=0
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 17:07, April 23, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Nick123 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Wasp H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 385 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "War with the Hornet(1500-2009) (The only section worth reading in this shitty article)" sums it up nicely. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Photo-less article's theme is dog turds, then the article itself, bickering with itself. I presume that, in 2007, the Rabbi was still amused at being an author and not so experienced as to do it right. Includes memes (Dubya? WMD?) and nonsense numbers. Spıke ¬ 23:04 7-Apr-14
Keep (1)
  1. Rabbi Techno's original seems fine, and held my interest enough to actually read the whole thing. Could use work and pictures though. Aleister 20:23 7-4-14
Comments

edit Welsh Congo H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 385 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Un-encyclopedic and random. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Welsh version of the Belgian (et al.) Congo could be fun if written by someone who knew something about Wales (other than its native translation) and about Africa. I've cleared up the worst here but it still lacks a reason to exist. Spıke ¬ 23:11 7-Apr-14

edit Alexander Graham Bell H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 385 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Do something with it, other than this randomness loosely bound to "Georg Dobbeyer Büch" (sadly, only a piped link to the usual Bush article). Spıke ¬ 23:14 7-Apr-14
Keep (1)
  1. The original isn't horribly bad. Or it can be deleted and redirected to Homophone, the article that almost turned me gay. Aleister 20:25 7-4-14
Comments

edit Alternate universe H T D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 225 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A main page that tries to be exactly the opposite of our main page. It's not very funny or even consistent in what it does ("Vote for featured image" instead of "Vote for the image with the worst quality", for example). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lame attempts at humor through rote translation of our main pages should use Babel instead. Spıke ¬ 12:23 14-Apr-14
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I like it. Simple and effective. For someone like me before I joined Uncyc this kind of page just made me laugh because it just ridicules the idea of an encyclopedia such as wikipedia. Only on Uncyclopedia can you get this. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:52, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Made me laugh, cry, salivate, and then hiccup. Aleister 18:50 20-4-14
Comments

edit Lightning H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 62 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Memish and lacks humour. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "Has been scientifically proven." Gassy phrases like this, and gassy initial quotations, will drive away the reader even before the Intro ends and the reader finds nothing left but dumb lists. Spıke ¬ 19:29 21-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adjective H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 62 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. First person. No humour. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "You are a FUCKING asshole." Stand-up comedy by an unfunny person. Spıke ¬ 19:27 21-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Admiral Ozzel H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 61 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Some good concepts however poorly written and mainly quotes. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The surfeit of quotes is easily fixable with a switchblade. The lack of humor, regarding a minor character in the Star Wars series, is not. Parents are "Incompetent Peep and Incompetent Person," and that is as close to funny as it gets. Confusion with Star Trek could be a theme but author takes it nowhere. Spıke ¬ 12:30 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Norbit H D

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 61 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, slightly memish and poorly written. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Read the outrageous plot at WP:Norbit#Plot. This blax-self-ploitation flick must get serviced by Uncyclopedia. Spıke ¬ 12:23 21-Apr-14
    And now has been. Spıke ¬ 12:31 22-Apr-14
Comments

edit Taking candy from strangers H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 61 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A thoroughly tedious read, about nothing. Spıke ¬ 12:02 21-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adolf Hilter H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 59 hours
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Of all the Monty Python sketches out there "Mr. Hilter in England" is one of the greatest however this article does not give it justice at all. It uses unoriginal comedy from the sketch and fills the rest in with memes. If re-written, needs a re-write which honours Monty Python by having Mr. Hilter on an encyclopedia but is actually funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:02, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. That's our hitler page? I've never looked at it. Gas it and then redirect to one of the better pages (we can't leave a red link where hitler used to be). Aleister 12:25 21=4=14
    Actually Al, this feature here is our Hitler page. Read the title of the VFD page again and if you haven't seen the sketch I'd suggest watching it! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. In fact, we don't need an article that simply tries in vain to out-Python Monty Python. I agree that all of the humor here is either unoriginal or not humor. Spıke ¬ 13:03 21-Apr-14
  4. Delete --ChiefjusticePS2 17:17, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:31, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Evil Illuminati Adolf Hitler Clone Society H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 59 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Poorly written, awful and not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2006-cruft; a Wacky Organization full of memes and devoid of humor. Repeated references to "Noam Particular" are and always have been red-links, with or without the middle name. Spıke ¬ 12:28 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adult H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 59 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listcruft and mainly images near end. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Promising intro. I deleted the picture-book and other cruft. What is left is two gender-based tedious lists revolving around puberty and sex organs. Delete that and there would be almost nothing left. It ought to be saved, but there really is nothing funny about adulthood. Spıke ¬ 12:36 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  1. I deleted the listcruft, and added some text. Check it out and see what you think. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:38, April 23, 2014 (UTC)

edit That time I was plundered in the ass by a Viking during my voyage to a retirement villa H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 33 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The title is promising, but the article isn't. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spıke ¬ 12:22 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit That time NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE during my sojourn on the internet H T D Survivor

Score: -1
Elapsed Time: 33 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This one is worse; provocation of black readers with utterly no comedy payback. Spıke ¬ 12:23 22-Apr-14
  2. Actually, the concept of this page is explained well here. But with the original NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE article deleted, it doesn't really make sense. Sorry, Al. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:35, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. The page is one of the most anti-racist pages we have here on uncy. In it's 2011 VFD attempt, in which it was saved by a vote of -6, some people understood that. I've just added more to make it clearer. The illustration, by the way, is a white man dressed up in blackface making fun of another white man dressed up in blackface. The links on the page take people to some of the original writing, but the page stands alone in explanation as a guy typing in his mother's basement. I'll add more to it later. Aleister 13:15 22-4-14
  2. With a link to the original page and more additions, it seems good enough to be kept. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:33, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Patch Adams H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 32 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. There are many reasons for this nomination, and one of this, that many people agree with, is that if it was written by an anonymous editor, Patch Adams would probably be deleted immediately after its creation. I don't think Uncyclopedia benefits from such articles. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not an Uncyclopedia article. Also: not funny. Spıke ¬ 13:25 22-Apr-14
Keep (1)
  1. Not my favorite but many people love it for reasons unknown, and the concept was well explained somewhere. So for posterity I will hold my nose and vote to keep. Aleister 13:22 22-4-14
    The concept doesn't change the fact that it is short and not extremely funny. Plus, as Puppy once explained, the image doesn't go well with the article. Even if the concept is clever, it will still be short and not extremely funny. Plus, the image still won't fit in the article. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:26, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Fuk u americkan pigs H T D Survivor

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 9 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A dialogue between an anonymous editor and Happytimes. I don't think it belongs to the main space. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:51, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Indeed it doesn't. Spıke ¬ 12:42 23-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Navelism/Vanity. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:24, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects