Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps)
m ({{VFDn|American Civil War (video game)}}: archive)
 
(11,752 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
<!-- Why is the end stuff at the beginning? Because {VFDr} contains a form to nominate a new page that adds a section at the end. -->
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia voting pages]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
[[de:Uncyclopedia:Löschen]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Anarchy}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace ARTICLENAME as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
==[[ARTICLENAMEHERE]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=02:53, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Has been under {{Tl|Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>02:53 14-Mar-16</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested. {{User:EStop/signature}} 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Lists. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't mingle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:35, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
==[[Republic of Lee Kingdom]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=00:57, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} I believe this is about Singapore, which already has an article to itself. Also, so many redlinks and it just looks very unfunny. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>00:35 5-Apr-16</small>
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
}}
+
#{{Delete}} Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'. {{User:EStop/signature}} 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
 
==[[Talk Talk]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=23:40, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Talking shit about a band does not make an article funny. In fact, it makes you look stupid. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} Am always happy to vote against an article whose brand of humor is, "Look at me! I don't know what I'm talking about!" Band members include "The Other Guy" and "Another Guy" and not until Sec. 2 does anything relate to the actual band, and even then a quote is attributed to "some snobby assed music journalist." Lame. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:47 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[NASDAQ]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Colony of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=22:15, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
# {{keep}} I fixed this up a bit, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Could be funny with a coordinated attack. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:36, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Rewritten.}} I fixed it up a bit more. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:12 29-May-12</small>
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} I don't like this. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
|comments=
 
* Having seen stock traders before, I would have to say that the tuxedo stereotype really adds flavor to this article! Speaking of which, have we an article about [[necktie]]s? --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:There's [[Clip-on tie]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:31 29-May-12</small>
 
*::Kay. There's also [[Bow tie]]. I'll make a disambiguation page. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 23:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
}}
 
   
==[[Malcolm Glazer]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=15:11, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=19:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} It is about someone real and notable (the owner of the Manchester United football club). It has a theme (map him onto the ''Lord of the Rings''). It has a fun shoop. What it lacks is explanation about '''why''' he relates to ''Lord of the Rings''--it is random allegory but humor is not far away. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 29-May-12</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete|I piss on this article}} And on the person responsible for it's cration. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
+
#{{Delete}} Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>15:11 26-Apr-16</small>
#No funny. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:22, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. {{User:Chunkles/sig}} 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=1
}}
 
 
==[[Mesherschmit Vs. Spitfire]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=04:02, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
#{{Keep}} It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
|delete=
 
[[File:ATT00071.jpg|thumb|right|100px]]
 
#This is pure nonesense. {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#{{Delete}} The initial shoop is entertaining but will live on elsewhere. Misspelling in page name; Brits with bad teeth and small penises. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:54 29-May-12</small>
 
#Yeah, I really did like the picture. Everything else is trash.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529123127}}
 
#Meshershit Vs. Shitfire. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:17, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Ok, now why the ''Hell'' didn't ''I'' think of that? You bastard.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529213710}}
 
#::Lol--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 22:05, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Diet Cola]]==
+
== {{VFDn|Dr. Chen Chinese medicine for breathe delight}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=03:59, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=6
 
|delete=
 
#Da fuq? {{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}}
 
#It is garbage with no concept and a single image with a ''non sequitur'' caption. And it was written by two ten-year-olds who just ate a bunch of taffy. That's ''what the fuq''.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071441}}
 
# I hate those articles saying "That food/drink is evil!"--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:09, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, Mr-ex777, that is about all this article says. A health scare needs to be done cleverly. I have grabbed the Hebrew Coke can for [[Diet Coke]], which itself is in sad shape. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:50 29-May-12</small>
 
#Reads like vandalism. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{burninate}} Too much crass, sex, and randomness. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:38, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
==[[Lost (TV series)/Previous recaps]]==
+
{{VFDt|time=17:54, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=5
 
|delete=
 
# {{delete|Huff, then turn into a content fork.}} This is currently the top article on [[Special:LongPages]], at 394,674 bytes. I suggest splitting it into separate articles by season, namely "Lost (TV series)/Season #". --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 21:16, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:Is the material worth preserving, or not? If so, you hardly need our vote to organize it better. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:27 29-May-12</small>
 
#::{{Delete|Another reason to huff:}} It's illogical to have a subpage of [[Lost (TV series)|a redirect]]. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:11, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#:::That's not a reason at all. It's very easy to change the title of the subpage so it's no longer a subpage of a redirect but of the page being redirected to. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''00:31, 30 May 2012''</small>
 
#::::Have we created a guide for choosing the best title for your work? If not, I can start one. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 01:55, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 
#[[Supernatural (TV series)|Huff outright]]. Just like <<< that page, this one is bloated, tedious splooge.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529071010}}
 
#Since Qzekrom brought this nom here more or less pointlessly, I am going to one-up him and vote to actually kill it a la Bizzee. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 19:28, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Pointless rambling. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 21:16, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Convinced by BB, below. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:09 29-May-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
*{{Comment|Abstain.}} Am not sure that this or any article with satirical renditions of hour-long TV shows from 2004 is not funny to some niche audience, no matter how tedious they are (the parodies, not the audience), and this is why I also abstain from bandcruft, gamecruft, and fightcruft. Surely Star Trek, from about 1970, is doted on comparably and everyone approves. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:52 29-May-12</small>
 
*:I watched every last episode of Lost, and I can tell you that I personally do not find anything the least bit funny about this concentrated pile of Fail. As for Star Trek, I feel rather lukewarm towards it and its spin-offs. However, if there were a Star Trek article that was 400 kB long, and was as comparatively unfunny, I'd vote to kill that thing with nukes.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529215646}}
 
}}
 
 
==[[Horizon]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=#Most of this seems more than acceptable content. Why are you nomming this? {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''14:03, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#This isn't bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 14:11, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} You have got to be joking.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:58, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#I've seen so many shit pages today, I'm kinda on He.Will.Kill's side on this one.{{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120529070529}}
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Niggas in Paris]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=5
 
|keep=#Hey bro, don't be hatin' on my homie's sweet page, yo. {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''13:56, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
#'''Keep'''. I chuckled. Good enough. Spike can't tell me what's funny. -{{User:Optimuschris/sig}}<small><small>16:12, 28 May</small></small>
 
#Prolly as an appropriate article for the song as you can ever get. And it repeats itself because that's the joke. --{{User:Thekillerfroggy/sig}} 00:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} That shit cray. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 00:55, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Feature!--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 12:57, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{Delete}} It repeats itself. How is that funny?--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 13:24, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I have the answer. It's not. {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|13:28|28|May|2012}}
 
#{{Delete|Let's hear it again!}} No, let's not. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:38 28-May-12</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
==[[Constitution (Games)]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=3
 
|keep=
 
#{{Keep}} "Constitution" is the stamina-like attribute of characters in role-playing games. Word play, such as "constitution" as the opposite of "prostitution," is a fine humor form we rarely see. This article unfortunately spreads a small amount of material very thin, but it's about something real, is intelligent, and it has an idea what it wants to achieve. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:24 27-May-12</small>
 
#'''Keep.''' It needs some work, like maybe an image or two, but it's promising. {{User:GEORGIEGIBBONS/sig}} 19:20, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep|Not bad enough.}} {{User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user/sig4}}<small>''12:27, 28 May 2012''</small>
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} The article was just.... I don't really know how to put it in words. It's bad, but as I read one, it got worst. It had a way of explaining itself, and it gets worse because it just puts some random stuff that's no sense and just very random and immature. If goes off topic more than once, and I honesty believe thaey were just putting stuff there just for the hell of it. It was so random and illogical, my brain actually felt really bad after trying to comprehend what the article is trying to say. I also highly doubt the subject that its talking about even exist (and if it does then it was not made by a intelligent person, and I'm not just saying that.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:15, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Pidgin English is endearing, but this article has nothing else. All I can figure is that author {{U|One-eyed Jack}} in 2008 saw a sales pitch, poorly translated, and transcribed it here without much enhancement. {{User:Spike/signature}}<small>17:54 27-Apr-16</small>
#This is pretty bad. --{{User:Xamralco/sig}} 13:44, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} An article about nothing under a title no-one will look up. The only comedy concept is a Chinese man speaking broken English, but it doesn't work when the article is about nothing. {{User:ConCass2/sig}} 18:58, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
|comments=
+
|keepnumber=0
*@SPIKE- That could work if it wasn't written so randomly.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 17:26, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
*:Now we're down to quibbles. (Get started! I already saved one today.) I suggest a section listing famous personalities with high (or low) Constitution ratings (who bare all on the cinema: constitution/prostitution) with the implications for the D&D cards of each. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:31 27-May-12</small>
 
*:I dumped some new ideas into it and scrubbed the old D&D-cruft. But the result just doesn't hang together. Someone else should take a turn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:01 28-May-12</small>
 
----
 
*Previously [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive260#Constitution_.28Games.29|VFD'd]], Jan'12; 0-3 Delete; kept by Lyrithya citing "apathy." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:35 27-May-12</small>
 
*Better title would be [[Constitution (gaming)]] but is protected to Admins due to past vandalism. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:38 27-May-12</small>
 
}}
 
 
==[[Tank Abbot]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=09:52, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=2
 
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#'''Keep'''. Weaker stuff - amusing for those who know who he is.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 12:17, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
#'''Keep'''. It's not that bad actually. It just needs to be reworked and those awful red links removed.--{{User:Iwillkillyou333/sig}} 16:45, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
#This is-a bad. {{User:Bizzeebeever/signature|20120526095235}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
==[[Apocalypse]]==
 
{{Votervfd|time=15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=5
 
|keep=
 
#'''Keep'''. Made this a little more encyclopedic, this is a major topic and has it's moments.--{{user:sycamore/sig}} 10:23, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 
#Vital, maybe rewrite.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 06:43, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#If the lists and redlinks were removed this would be a nice little article. {{User:Frosty/sig3}} 06:45, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} For no reason lol. --[[User:SecondChanceForMe|2<small><sup>nd</sup></small> Chance for me]] ''(because I was'' '''banned'''.'')'' [[User talk:SecondChanceForMe|<small>(Say)</small>]] 09:35, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Keep}} (Formerly '''Delete'''.) <s>Dumb disclaimer put me in a bad mood to encounter the long lists that followed. Instead, redirect it to [[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]] (though it is being worsened by a newbie today).</s> No longer a gaping sore thanks to Mr-ex777. Could still use an owner and an actual theme. Don't call the reader a wanker in the intro. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:01 24-May-12</small>
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{Delete}}And redirect to [[End of Time]]. --{{User:Scofield/sig}} 15:57, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} This is, once again, one of those articles that starts promisingly with a nice photo, nice thumbnail-text, nice first five/six sentences, then comes an ultimately random piece which, somehow, features a celebraty on some part (George Bush is a celebrity right?) and then turns into an endless like list which starts annoying the reader who turns his/hers back to the article and votes for deletion. This is sad. : ( {{User:Cat the Colourful/sig sig 2|16:55|28|May|2012}}
 
#* In that case, it should only be that long. --{{User:Qzekrom/sig6}} 22:41, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*Lists and chuck norris removed.--{{User:Mr-ex777/sig}} 09:33, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 13:13, April 28, 2016

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Expert3222 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Anarchy H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1115 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Has been under {{Fix}} for a solid month with no action. I just deleted the listiest and cruftiest sections. There are so many more clever ways to write about anarchy than just stereotypes of Bernie Sanders types (who hardly want the government to go away and leave someone else to give them their free diplomas). Spıke Radiomicrophone02:53 14-Mar-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Although it is a good title. Perhaps for the to-do list if no one else is interested.  EStop Easy button 02:07, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lists. ConCass2 (talk) 08:25, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Trans-Brazilian HighGAYway H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 589 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Reader might enjoy this — if he is from Brazil, and if he speaks English, and if he thinks "gay" is an automatic joke. Otherwise, no. Spıke Radiomicrophone00:35 5-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I'm not saying that the word "gay" is automatically funny, but how do you fuck it up and not put "highgay"? Wouldn't that have worked better? The article itself is just rambling and bad dirty "jokes". ConCass2 (talk) 08:05, April 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not a bad concept, but the execution is just crap gay jokes. This had the potential be a Rio carnival of postcard puns, describing life in the back alleys as viewed from the 'other bus'.  EStop Easy button 07:01, April 17, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Colony of America H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 71 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ranty, first-person polemic; humorless; under a page title no one will look up. Spıke Radiomicrophone15:11 26-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Aside from the suggestion that the Queen of England is a transvestite (hidden under a false typo in the Civil War section), there are no jokes to be found in this uninspired conspiracy theory. Chunkles talk ✏️ contribs 23:41, April 26, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It's at least well-written and I do find it a little funny, even if it is outdated by about three-hundred years. Certainly not something I'd consider VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 08:27, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Comments

edit Dr. Chen Chinese medicine for breathe delight H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 44 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pidgin English is endearing, but this article has nothing else. All I can figure is that author One-eyed Jack in 2008 saw a sales pitch, poorly translated, and transcribed it here without much enhancement. Spıke Radiomicrophone17:54 27-Apr-16
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. An article about nothing under a title no-one will look up. The only comedy concept is a Chinese man speaking broken English, but it doesn't work when the article is about nothing. ConCass2 (talk) 18:58, April 27, 2016 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects