Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Longinus)
({{VFDn|Empire: Total War}}: new section)
 
(6,054 intermediate revisions by 91 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Rasta Jesus}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=00:37, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#Do we really need an article on this? There seems to be nothing useful here, no concept or anything. We have plenty of Jesii already. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929003735}}
  +
#{{Delete|"Shit (literal shit)."}} I have no problem with the existence of the article, as it can be found with the Jesii nav-template. But this article starts with a fanboy tone, stops for a moment at the assertion that non-separatism is racist (which now in the US, I find serious and unfunny), and ends in history-of-the-future and lists. Bottom line, after the useful concept of a Rastafarian Christ, authors have nothing they actually want to say about him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:43 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Precious little to do with anything. Like the pic though. I guess that came from elsewhere? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:28, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Mark Rutte}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=00:38, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
== [[Unquotable:Litterbox]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Spotted by {{U|Llwy-ar-lawr}}. Imported from the Dutch Uncyclopedia last year as the only contribution of {{U|Burgerhallojan}}, seemingly translated by machine, poorly; minimal attempt to clean up and tons of red-links. Notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, but the reader will be straining too hard to read the "English" to laugh. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:38 29-Sep-14</small>
  +
#Yeah. That. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929004446}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
|comments=*Actually, Spike did see it, and [[User talk:Burgerhallojan|commented to its author]] about it, but, er... this sentence ought to have a sensible ending and I just can't think of one. Maybe this is a pointless comment and I should go back to sleep. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929004446}}
|delete=#{{delete}} Back in 2006, {{U|some user}} created a copy of the [[sandbox]] in quotespace. Literally. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} An alternate namespace no more needs its own Sandbox than, well, the F.C.C. needs its own judges and welfare system. Happily, this aberration we can get rid of without a union grievance. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:03 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} No need for this redundancy. The quotes on this page aren't even that funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:01, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
 
|comments=
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes in Piratespeak]], [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]],[[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Trailer Park Boys}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=20:47, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#{{keep}} I like the idea of these other "languages", and the unquotable pages are classic examples of these other faux languages. Besides, removing these pages should be a decision put off until the fate of the Unquotable namespace is decided, since they are linked to on the main page of the Unquotable namespace, and would require a change to that page. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} Argh matey. This be unquotes in piratespeak. Shiver me timbers and hoist the mizzen mast. Make this land-lubbing article walk the plank and send it to Davy Jones's locker. Avast, ye scalawags: yo-ho-ho and a bottle of rum. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Could have sworn that ''Groundhog Day'' has passed, but I keep seeing the same page over and over. Nominator counted 37 pages in this namespace: How many are prank copies of the same text? (Don't spend time researching that question....) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} No redeeming qualities; the subject must have been funnier than this listcrufty report on it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:47 29-Sep-14</small>
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
+
#{{Delete}} Listing badly but take that away, there would be very little left. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 22:24, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=*'''Clarification.''' There about about 65 pages, 37 of which are "real articles". This type of stuff is not counted as a "real article". There are <s>two</s> three more repeats of the mainpage. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:47, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{delete|Being really fucking awesome. Its a serious crime. Dont fuck with them.}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140929223441}}
*:'''Yikes!''' We have allowed more than one article per VFD nomination, provided you specify exactly what is to be deleted when nominating, and you don't mind having the vote be all-or-nothing. Hint, hint. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*::Iz admin, go ahead and do it. Other three are [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]], and the somewhat "different" [[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:59, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:::By consensus of the only voters so far, it is so ordered. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:09 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::PS--The Français page is a disambig over to our French counterpart, something we should not put ourselves in the business of doing except via the Sidebar; the Obfuscata illustrates something that should be a canon rule: The bonus points for "writing an article in the style of the thing it's about" should have a big red warning sign for the repetitive, the gratuitously confusing, and the otherwise very bad, which this one is. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:14 18-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
 
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_on_Wheels]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{delete}} another unquotable reskin. This was has formatting to make it look vandalized. Largely untouched since 2006. Apparently, adding "ON WHEEELS" randomly and repeatedly was funny back in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Did the <s>vandal</s> author know that a VFD template was coming when he wrote his SPAN with absolute positioning to overlay it? I had a notion to hack this prank away, but I hope and expect the entire page will meet its maker soon. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:30 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} This page is ugly, and really doesn't add much of anything, and isn't even close to another "language", doesn't teach n00bs anything either. It can go. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Dumbass]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This is a basically a reskin of [[Unquotable:Main_Page]]. And by reskin, I mean text change. This is essentially the same article as it was in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} And the "text change" is to vulgar (not even original-vulgar but vulgar in the style of Dumbass). Amusing to the author (creatively named {{U|Some user}}, sigh), not clever for the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:04 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Dumb but not amusing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:42, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[:Category:Things Retards Believe]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=15:51, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=12:16, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Another category by which to slap a tag on an article that you simply dislike the subject. Used in userspace and, of course, on [[Fox News]]. A clever insult is one thing; saying retards believe it is drive-by listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} User-optional code to render the names of Admins in bold in reports and diff pages is tedious to keep current, and there is no evidence that anyone uses it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:51 30-Sep-14</small>
#'''Yep''' per below {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
+
#Looks like we don't need this. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930161406}}
#{{delete}} Insult category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Don't know what this is, but I don't like it. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 19:21, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
 
*Comment: While this has no value by itself, the subcategories themselves are worth keeping, and preferably in a common area. A rename to something along the lines of “[[This page does not exist|Category:Lies for the gullible]]” or the ilk would work. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:36 18 Feb 2013}}
 
*:{{Delete}} The subcategories will survive the deletion of this category, as will, of course, the pages in the category. Apart from the un-P.C. reference to "retards," this category is an epithet with no cleverness. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:05 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I know. I just think the deletion leaves a category gap. It's a stupid cat, though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
 
*:::Most categories are in multiple meta-categories, so category deletion does not create a gap. If this category is deleted, [[:Category:Ineffective Left Wing Propaganda]], [[:Category:Nasty Right Wing Bitches‎]], [[:Category:Political Bullshit‎]], and [[:Category:Politicians‎]] will no longer be sub-sub-categories of [[:Category:Retards]]. So it isn't destroying any information, other that a "People who politics I dislike, and therefore insult (immaturely)" category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
==[[Debate]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:46, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete|Delete and redirect}} to [[UnDebate:Main Page]]. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 17 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, do exactly that. Some day a student on the debate team will write an article with serious ridicule of that experience. That will beat the crap out of this long ramble that treats debate as yet another Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:40 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} per above. I lost interest in this article about halfway through the sample debate, and couldn't be bothered to read all of it, it's that bad. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*The main reason for highlighting admins that I know of is to make it easier to flag down active ones--hence the original code that highlighted them only in recent changes, which both sites have now done away with. Highlighting them anywhere else is excessive and obnoxious, IMHO. Since we've taken the approach of making bold admins an optional CSS thing, it seems likely to me that anyone who is experienced enough to know how to use it is also experienced enough to know the active admins' names by heart, or at least where to go to get their attention. That certainly applies to me; I know who has what rights here and I've never had any use for calling them out beyond a desire to make things flashier. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930161406}}<br>And besides, we already have a link to [[Uncyclopedia:Active Admins]] at the top of recent changes, in that grey box thingy, so even the original purpose of the bold names doesn't hold any water. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140930163337}}
  +
*:One use for our code is that it highlights edits by Admins in a diff report or a page history, for the benefit of users who are hesitant to override Admins. Separately and again, what any other website does is not a factor here. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:43 30-Sep-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Mexican Canadian War of 1984]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Empire: Total War}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:42, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
# {{Delete}} as discussed on [[User talk:Aleister in Chains#Mexican Canadian War of 1984]]. A winner of the ''WTF and why is it here?'' award. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete|Delete promptly.}} No one will ever look for this article (except Anon, overnight) and no one cares about author's random history-of-the-future (set in 1984 only because 1984 is a meme). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:19 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} yet another Wacky War with an old meme thrown in. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:57, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Unquotable:Charles Darwin]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=22:48, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
*Please discuss the global issue further at [[Forum:Crapspaces]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:50 17-Feb-13</small>
 
{{Votervfd|time=10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delnumber=1
|delete=#{{delete}} I'm throwing this out to see if we want to trim back the UnQuotable project. I support its deletion, because scattershot lists of quotes are not funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Aside from the overuse of strikethrough and {{C|Censored}}, this article is full of exact dates and links to data on external websites. It was surely written not to amuse but to record the history of this game and certain gamers' gripes against the manufacturers and their difficult implementations. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:48 30-Sep-14</small>
*[[Unquotable]] is a parody of Wikiquote. This means that it's essentially a scattershot of lists of quotes. Some of these are okay, given that it's a very limited frame. Most of them are terrible. And [[Unquotable:Steven Wright]]<ref>Now deleted, independent of the issues discussed here; a cut-and-paste from an external humor website. -Spike</ref> has recently been recreated, and as with previous incarnations is pretty woeful. While I'd agree with a massive trim on these pages (which I went through and trimmed out a lot of these a year ago, but VFD'd few of them), the namespace has it's place. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 17 Feb}}
 
*:Just because Wikipedia does something doesn't mean we should copy it. An example is the fork's recent "UnVoyage" which is likely to turn into Ultra-Towncruft, if it isn't forgotten in a few months. While the unquotable format does parody an actual thing, it is not particularly conducive to writing good material. There is no good reason why there should be a quote page by Charles Darwin, and not one by, say Preggobear. I could create a quote page for Preggobear, but anything I can say there can be , and probably is, said better in paragraph format in the mainspace article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:18, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::Yeah, but if we tried to do a [[Captain Oblivious]] article it... well, you can see what I ended up doing with it. I've trimmed this particular page down now to remove some of the worst quotes. (Although I agree - I see no value in UnVoyage. It'll go much the same way as UnBestiary in the end.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:17 17 Feb}}
 
*:::My issue is that you are saving weak articles by moving them out of mainspace into a "crapspace" for lack of a better term. Articles like [[Captain Oblivious]] should stand or fall on their own merits, not hide their flaws behind a namespace. It would like moving '''Robotic ghost pirates''' to '''UnLegacyRandumbo:Robotic ghost pirates''' instead of taking it to VFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::::Except that I didn't think it was VFD worthy. I felt it had merit, but not in the “frame” of mainspace. Otherwise we should delete UnDictionary because all the articles are stubs. Under that “frame”, this article works. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
----
 
<references />
 
}}
 
 
== [[Avogadro]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
 
== [[Word Salad]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#{{keep}} In the style of what it's about, this article is intentionally random, and meant to be that way. It is slightly longer than it needs to be, but some randomness is amusing, and this deliberately goes over the top in its randomness. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:02, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} random for the sake of random. This has been kept twice, but it has been 3 years since it has been taken to VFD. It has only 1 mainspace link, so I am guessing no-one really cares about it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I can't add to my argument in its last VFD; but in the one before that, before I arrived, it had overwhelming support: Don't delete until Romartus has had a say. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:45 17-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Longinus]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} red-link laden randumbo from 2006 that survived this long mainly due to mentioning kitten huffing. Although it has been edited a few times since 2006, it is still the same article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Pick a topic. Pick a meme. Shuffle. The result is filler. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:49 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Per above. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:04, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[World War III-XX]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} a wacky war from the 31st century between Coke and Pepsi involving Harrison Ford, Tome Cruise, and Chuck Norris. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Per above. There used to be World War articles on every number between III and about XV, and we got rid of all; did this one survive merely from our fatigue? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:47 17-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[JC-bashers]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 16-Feb-13</small>
 
#I like [[Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers]], but I also like [[An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective]]. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
*I've heard “JC bashers” used as a term for any grass roots Christian evangelist movement. It's not a common phrase here either though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
 
}}
 
 
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#'''Delete'''. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:43 16 Feb}}
 
|comments=
 
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
 
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:45 16-2-'13
 
*::::Do we have a limit? My personal limit is 1; as when yesterday I cut out a section of [[Bear wrestler]] with no original comedy, designed only to share a TV show with other Uncyclopedians. Which is as close as you come to comedy in the deleted sections. We appreciate the work of cops but not enough to allow roughing up detainees; and we benefit from your skill but not when you use the website to catalog the rants of a commentator you disagree with. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:27 17-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::::I just visited [[Bear wrestler]]. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered it wasn't about hairy homosexual gladiators. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:34 17 Feb}}
 
*On a related note, I found [[Unquotable:Glenn Beck]] which is similarly themed, although it is written like a bad uncyclopedia rather than a bad liberaladvocacypedia article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 22:48, September 30, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Rasta Jesus H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 46 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Do we really need an article on this? There seems to be nothing useful here, no concept or anything. We have plenty of Jesii already. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:37 29 Sep 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote "Shit (literal shit)." I have no problem with the existence of the article, as it can be found with the Jesii nav-template. But this article starts with a fanboy tone, stops for a moment at the assertion that non-separatism is racist (which now in the US, I find serious and unfunny), and ends in history-of-the-future and lists. Bottom line, after the useful concept of a Rastafarian Christ, authors have nothing they actually want to say about him. Spıke ¬ 00:43 29-Sep-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Precious little to do with anything. Like the pic though. I guess that came from elsewhere? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:28, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Mark Rutte H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 46 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spotted by Llwy-ar-lawr. Imported from the Dutch Uncyclopedia last year as the only contribution of Burgerhallojan, seemingly translated by machine, poorly; minimal attempt to clean up and tons of red-links. Notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, but the reader will be straining too hard to read the "English" to laugh. Spıke ¬ 00:38 29-Sep-14
  2. Yeah. That. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:44 29 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Actually, Spike did see it, and commented to its author about it, but, er... this sentence ought to have a sensible ending and I just can't think of one. Maybe this is a pointless comment and I should go back to sleep. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 00:44 29 Sep 2014

edit Trailer Park Boys H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 26 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming qualities; the subject must have been funnier than this listcrufty report on it. Spıke ¬ 20:47 29-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listing badly but take that away, there would be very little left. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:24, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Being really fucking awesome. Its a serious crime. Dont fuck with them. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 22:34 29 Sep 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎ H T D Tag article

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 6 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. User-optional code to render the names of Admins in bold in reports and diff pages is tedious to keep current, and there is no evidence that anyone uses it. Spıke ¬ 15:51 30-Sep-14
  2. Looks like we don't need this. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:14 30 Sep 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't know what this is, but I don't like it. ConCass2 (talk) 19:21, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The main reason for highlighting admins that I know of is to make it easier to flag down active ones--hence the original code that highlighted them only in recent changes, which both sites have now done away with. Highlighting them anywhere else is excessive and obnoxious, IMHO. Since we've taken the approach of making bold admins an optional CSS thing, it seems likely to me that anyone who is experienced enough to know how to use it is also experienced enough to know the active admins' names by heart, or at least where to go to get their attention. That certainly applies to me; I know who has what rights here and I've never had any use for calling them out beyond a desire to make things flashier. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:14 30 Sep 2014
    And besides, we already have a link to Uncyclopedia:Active Admins at the top of recent changes, in that grey box thingy, so even the original purpose of the bold names doesn't hold any water. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (talkcontribs) 16:33 30 Sep 2014
    One use for our code is that it highlights edits by Admins in a diff report or a page history, for the benefit of users who are hesitant to override Admins. Separately and again, what any other website does is not a factor here. Spıke ¬ 16:43 30-Sep-14

edit Empire: Total War H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 0 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Aside from the overuse of strikethrough and Censored, this article is full of exact dates and links to data on external websites. It was surely written not to amuse but to record the history of this game and certain gamers' gripes against the manufacturers and their difficult implementations. Spıke ¬ 22:48 30-Sep-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects