Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Mexican Canadian War of 1984)
({{VFDn|Supergirl/classic/short}}: delete)
 
(6,506 intermediate revisions by 93 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|The Last World War}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=09:49, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} In depth analysis, stage-by-stage using maps, of a made-up conflict that only the author cares about. Complete with made-up statistics like "123,456" as well. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 09:49, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{delete|It is occasionally criticized for being slightly destructive.}} The intro--from which that sentence is taken--looked promising, but the descriptions of the conflict didn't do anything for me. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141011162737}}
  +
#{{Delete}} This article about nothing keeps begging for editors' time to fix it up, while never inducing anyone to take control and make it funny. See also '''Comments'''. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:05 13-Oct-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} Sorry, but I found it funny, especially the maps. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:27, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I voted {{Keep|Keep}} [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive235#The_Last_World_War|last time]] based on Aleister doing work, a commitment that he says in the ballot he never made. I had been moved at the concept of the unknowability of a Last War; now I find the concept undeveloped and I think the bit about humanity going extinct and the author being a panda is dumb. Llwy is working on it, but the maps Anton199 likes suggest to me comic book, not encyclopedia; and the problem is the text, which needs a better comedy theme than "War so nutty!" {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:48 11-Oct-14</small>
  +
*:All I did was fix some spelling and formatting, and I don't see myself doing any more; I wouldn't overestimate me. It's more readable now, but no funnier. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141011165618}}
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Good Electricity and Bad Electricity}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=14:04, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=3
== [[Unquotable:Litterbox]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} A tiny bit of pseudo-intellectualism. Might fit on Illogicopedia. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:04 12-Oct-14</small>
  +
#Agreed. I'll stick it there right now. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141012183634}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 10:13, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
|comments=*It's well written. I'm inclined to leave it, so that it may pleasantly surprise those who stumble across it. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 09:19, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} Back in 2006, {{U|some user}} created a copy of the [[sandbox]] in quotespace. Literally. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} An alternate namespace no more needs its own Sandbox than, well, the F.C.C. needs its own judges and welfare system. Happily, this aberration we can get rid of without a union grievance. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:03 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} No need for this redundancy. The quotes on this page aren't even that funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:01, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
 
|comments=
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes in Piratespeak]], [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]],[[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Arsene Wenger}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=13:17, October 14, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#{{keep}} I like the idea of these other "languages", and the unquotable pages are classic examples of these other faux languages. Besides, removing these pages should be a decision put off until the fate of the Unquotable namespace is decided, since they are linked to on the main page of the Unquotable namespace, and would require a change to that page. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} Argh matey. This be unquotes in piratespeak. Shiver me timbers and hoist the mizzen mast. Make this land-lubbing article walk the plank and send it to Davy Jones's locker. Avast, ye scalawags: yo-ho-ho and a bottle of rum. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Could have sworn that ''Groundhog Day'' has passed, but I keep seeing the same page over and over. Nominator counted 37 pages in this namespace: How many are prank copies of the same text? (Don't spend time researching that question....) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} I am nominating this to try to achieve improvements to, not deletion of, this article on the football manager by some editor Over There. I am not even sure whether getting thrown out of a cinema relates to anything. As it stands, the initial and recurring theme is Pedo/Anal/Rape/SexWithBlackMen Humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:17 14-Oct-14</small>
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
+
#Can't we just delete this? I don't see anyone stepping forward to help. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141018213221}}
|comments=*'''Clarification.''' There about about 65 pages, 37 of which are "real articles". This type of stuff is not counted as a "real article". There are <s>two</s> three more repeats of the mainpage. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:47, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:We can and will, if we prevail in the vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:27 19-Oct-14</small>
*:'''Yikes!''' We have allowed more than one article per VFD nomination, provided you specify exactly what is to be deleted when nominating, and you don't mind having the vote be all-or-nothing. Hint, hint. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Something I could work on but this existing article is crap. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 09:58, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
*::Iz admin, go ahead and do it. Other three are [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]], and the somewhat "different" [[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:59, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
*:::By consensus of the only voters so far, it is so ordered. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:09 18-Feb-13</small>
+
|keep=
*:::PS--The Français page is a disambig over to our French counterpart, something we should not put ourselves in the business of doing except via the Sidebar; the Obfuscata illustrates something that should be a canon rule: The bonus points for "writing an article in the style of the thing it's about" should have a big red warning sign for the repetitive, the gratuitously confusing, and the otherwise very bad, which this one is. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:14 18-Feb-13</small>
+
|comments=
  +
*I'm not sure what's supposed to happen here, but you might be interested in [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Arsene_Wenger?oldid=1635086 this] slightly more sanitary version. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141014173645}}
  +
*:It is much cleaner, but it is also from 2007, and presumably omits comedy based on news in the last seven years — I assume there is some. Is there a Brit in the house who would like to do a merge? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:11 14-Oct-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_on_Wheels]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Laptop}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=06:34, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{delete|Obnoxious teenagers who talk to their parents like shit were caused by laptops.}} This article begins with the premises that laptops are useful for viewing porn and are 'three dimensional magic box[es]', then goes on to discuss... essentially nothing. It has been almost the same since it was rewritten in 2007; [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Laptop?oldid=972881 prior to that], it wasn't much better (''It is project with much effort, but it not marketable and usable. Then he exploded.''). I have a replacement at [[User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Laptop]]. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141019063455}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Intro also has a list of memes and a junk acronym; pointless Section 2 is overwhelmed by illustrations; then nothing but listcruft until the trite finale: Laptops are actually alien lifeforms. Proposed replacement is not ready.... {{User:SPIKE/signature}} 10:47, 19 October 2014
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} another unquotable reskin. This was has formatting to make it look vandalized. Largely untouched since 2006. Apparently, adding "ON WHEEELS" randomly and repeatedly was funny back in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Did the <s>vandal</s> author know that a VFD template was coming when he wrote his SPAN with absolute positioning to overlay it? I had a notion to hack this prank away, but I hope and expect the entire page will meet its maker soon. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:30 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} This page is ugly, and really doesn't add much of anything, and isn't even close to another "language", doesn't teach n00bs anything either. It can go. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Detailed editing comments moved to replacement article's talk page. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:04 19-Oct-14</small>
  +
*Not sure if this is the right place to say this, but I've tried to follow your suggestions, Spike, and would appreciate it if you could have another look. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141023200806}}
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Dumbass]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Igpay Atinlay}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDg|time=10:38, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete|Replace.}} 1 gimmick, 0 jokes (may be more than 0 but it's too tedious to scan the article to see if there are jokes). Page title with gimmick applied to it ensures no one will search for it, or they will get exactly what they expected and will not laugh. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:38 19-Oct-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} How the Hell did it not cross the author's mind that nobody can read this page? (Unless this is a prime example of the author trying to amuse himself out of confusing the readers) [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:32, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#'''Replace''' with [[User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Pig Latin|non-Pig Latin version]], and probably '''move''' to [[Pig Latin]] (unless there's something there, in which case I'm not sure what we do). I am no scholar of Pig Latin and I find it about as bothersome to read as do Spike and ConCass, but I found the actual content somewhat amusing. I strongly encourage anyone whose main or sole criterion for voting '''delete''' was its unreadability to read the English version and reconsider. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020225334}}
  +
#:'''Changing above vote to Replace'''. That was a fun read. How can anyone on '''a humor wiki''' prefer a page that is merely a perfect encoding? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:55 20-Oct-14</small>
  +
#{{Replace}} or something. The actual content is pretty good and the main problem seems that the article is hard to read. It would be good if it was replaced by Llwy's "translated" version, but the original should probably be kept as a subpage and linked to in the See also section, because there are people who will actually find reading the page in Pig Latin more amusing than reading it in English. Also, the page doesn't have to be deleted at all: the original one could be kept where it is now, and Llwy's version can be pasted at [[Pig Latin]]... {{User:Anton199/sig}} 16:19, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:And you don't need a vote of VFD to replace a redirect that doesn't delete an Uncyclopedian's substantive work. But I won't flip my vote anyway; I don't want the gimmicky version to exist, because editors spend time polishing the codification that they could spend writing funny stuff. I recently tweaked [[HTBFANJS#Pages that look like the things they're about]] to be a little more disapproving; for instance, to cite only articles that have more than a gimmick, versus articles that pursue a gimmick unusually well. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:31 21-Oct-14</small>
  +
#:Have moved the plaintext article to [[Pig Latin]], replacing the redirect. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:49 23-Oct-14</small>
  +
#::We could also have the Pig Latin and English versions side by side in the same article, with a table or something. That seems like enough of a compromise to satisfy everyone to some extent. In any case, I hope we preserve the history instead of just deleting the thing and moving 'mine' on top, because the real authors should be given credit. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141021224702}}
  +
#:No, please! We ought not put fairness to previous authors on a par with having an article hang together and look good. A link is OK, for readers who really want Pig Latin in Pig Latin; but presenting him with multiple versions at once distracts him for the sake of someone's vanity. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:55 23-Oct-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} I think it's kind of cute. I got a laugh out of it. Granted, it's a little hard to read, but I think it should stay in Pig Latin -- it just seems totally appropriate. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 22:43, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
*In fact, [[Pig Latin]] redirects to [[Igpay Atinlay]], so it is entirely probable that someone would get here by searching for Pig Latin. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020225536}}
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Igpay Atinlay}} bis ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=23:49, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{delete}} This is a basically a reskin of [[Unquotable:Main_Page]]. And by reskin, I mean text change. This is essentially the same article as it was in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} And the "text change" is to vulgar (not even original-vulgar but vulgar in the style of Dumbass). Amusing to the author (creatively named {{U|Some user}}, sigh), not clever for the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:04 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Having moved the plaintext version to [[Pig Latin]], replacing the redirect to [[Igpay Atinlay]], do voters still want the article about Pig Latin in Pig Latin to go away? I do. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:49 23-Oct-14</small>
#{{Delete}} Dumb but not amusing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:42, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} If we have the article in English, having a duplicate in unreadable Pig Latin is stupid and unnecessary. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 12:58, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:As I said above, I think we should have one. I found reading the page on Pig Latin in Pig Latin quite amusing and very Uncyclopedia-like past-time. I know many people who will actually laugh when they see it. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:09, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#::Does it imply that no future Uncyclopedian should edit [[Pig Latin]] without (groan!) keeping [[Igpay Atinlay]] in synch? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:15 25-Oct-14</small>
  +
#:::I think that's going to be up to the editor who will want to make any changes to [[Pig Latin]]. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:30, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#OK, {{Keep}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:14, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Could it be a subpage maybe? (I have no opinion.) {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141024021325}}
  +
*:In fact, it could stay right where it is, though I'd rather it not. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:18 25-Oct-14</small>
  +
*As per what I said in the first nomination, I think we should keep it somewhere. If it stays right where it is, it should have a link to the plain English version right at the beginning, however. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:25, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:That would be a {{Keep}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:40 25-Oct-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[:Category:Things Retards Believe]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|That Guy You Hate}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:16, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=16:51, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Gay ''humour''. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 16:51, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A non-encyclopedic chat about no one. The title plus the template ("This page...is completely worthless") plus the Intro ("let's do some quality bitching about that little fucker") should keep the reader from reading further. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:07 19-Oct-14</small>
  +
#{{delete|I'm gonna tear off his Penis and use it as a toilet plunger.}} Yet more disgusting gay-bashing. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020184757}}
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} Strangely, the profanity knocks back the humour and makes the article less funny. But the subject has potential for a good page and doesn't look like something thrown together by an anon in 5 minutes. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:36, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:You mean it has potential for a good page, but it isn't one right now? If it's not good now, it shouldn't remain in its current state. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020184757}}
  +
#::I mean it can be redeemed with editing, without having to rewrite the whole page. I just couldn't word it right. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:29, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|Short Circuit}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=00:21, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Another category by which to slap a tag on an article that you simply dislike the subject. Used in userspace and, of course, on [[Fox News]]. A clever insult is one thing; saying retards believe it is drive-by listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} No redeeming qualities. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:21 20-Oct-14</small>
#'''Yep''' per below {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
+
#With an article like this, I can't imagine that seeing the movies would make me think any better of it. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020185527}}
#{{delete}} Insult category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Nothing but sex. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:12, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=#{{Keep}} I'm not a fan of humour about sex but the immature part of my brain did make me laugh while reading this and I can't vote to delete something that made me laugh so I'll vote to keep. We ought to cater for all humour types as long as it is a parody. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 14:06, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Comment: While this has no value by itself, the subcategories themselves are worth keeping, and preferably in a common area. A rename to something along the lines of “[[This page does not exist|Category:Lies for the gullible]]” or the ilk would work. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:36 18 Feb 2013}}
+
*Just wondering of you've even seen the movies, Spike? --{{User:Maniac1075/sig}} 03:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
*:{{Delete}} The subcategories will survive the deletion of this category, as will, of course, the pages in the category. Apart from the un-P.C. reference to "retards," this category is an epithet with no cleverness. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:05 18-Feb-13</small>
+
*:I have not. I was not evaluating the movies. The Uncyclopedia page is a start-to-finish Anal Sex Joke. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 20-Oct-14</small>
*::I know. I just think the deletion leaves a category gap. It's a stupid cat, though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
+
*Yeah, try watching them!--{{User:Maniac1075/sig}} 23:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
*:::Most categories are in multiple meta-categories, so category deletion does not create a gap. If this category is deleted, [[:Category:Ineffective Left Wing Propaganda]], [[:Category:Nasty Right Wing Bitches‎]], [[:Category:Political Bullshit‎]], and [[:Category:Politicians‎]] will no longer be sub-sub-categories of [[:Category:Retards]]. So it isn't destroying any information, other that a "People who politics I dislike, and therefore insult (immaturely)" category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
*:No offence but... you are saying that the content of the movies somehow justifies the article's consisting entirely of sex jokes (and no, Spike, it's not just anal sex)? I can't really see that. Perhaps you could summarise the plot points you were parodying, for the benefit of us lazy bums who can't be bothered to watch the movies? {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020235324}}
  +
*::Actually nevermind--I read {{w|Short Circuit|Wikipedia's article}}, and I really can't see either the value of turning it into one long sex joke or the attributes of the movie that inspired you to do so. Sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020235837}}
  +
*I still recommend watching the movie so you know what you're reading about. I can't see any reason someone who doesn't know what an article is about would find anything funny about it if they don't get it. If that's the case, I could spend the next week adding VFD to so many articles on this site.--{{User:Maniac1075/sig}} 09:41, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I know perfectly well what I'm reading about, as I said above. I could guess what the movie was about from your article, actually. There is ''nothing'' that can justify turning it into what you turned it into. Nothing. Besides, the article shouldn't require intimate knowledge of the subject matter to be comprehensible; if it does, and if many readers haven't got that knowledge, it probably shouldn't exist. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141021133854}}
  +
*::Yeah cause alot of people just read random articles they know nothing about. My point is, it's not funny to you few people, yet the ones I showed it to found it pretty funny indeed. I just don't agree that the small majority of voters against something is able to rule out an article as being unfunny, just because it's not the type of humor they enjoy. So what it comes down to, is if it doesn't please you couple of people who have time to vote for peoples work to be deleted because you don't personally like it, that means it should not exist for those who do. right? I dunno, maybe it's non Australians not getting Australian humor? Too bad there is no Uncylcopedia.com.au I guess.--{{User:Maniac1075/sig}} 15:33, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:::Seems a large dollop of short pants to me but suggest you ask {{u|Frosty}} or {{u|PuppyOnTheRadio}} as they're from the Land of Oz for their views. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 15:15, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Debate]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Owl}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:46, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=23:30, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#Wow, I just... don't even know where to begin. This article is almost entirely random nonsense; it barely has a concept--that of documenting and/or parodying the O RLY meme, which probably won't go over too well with some people here, and I'm not fond of it either--and that's only after I cut out a lot of it. [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Owl?oldid=5831831 Prior to my edits], it really was about nothing. A much more cut-down version may be found at [[User:Llwy-ar-lawr/scratchpad]], which I'm still not too happy with (though you are welcome to say you want that as the replacement). I feel like we should have an article on owls, but I have no clue what it should consist of, and it's certainly not what we have now. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141020233058}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Nominator cleaned it up a lot, but it's still a ramble. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:27 21-Oct-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:27, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete|Delete and redirect}} to [[UnDebate:Main Page]]. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 17 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, do exactly that. Some day a student on the debate team will write an article with serious ridicule of that experience. That will beat the crap out of this long ramble that treats debate as yet another Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:40 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} per above. I lost interest in this article about halfway through the sample debate, and couldn't be bothered to read all of it, it's that bad. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Mexican Canadian War of 1984]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Nude figure-skating}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:42, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=11:41, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A dumb ramble. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:41 22-Oct-14</small>
  +
#Fails to live up to the wonderfully silly premise of being naked in a situation that so clearly calls for warm clothing. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141024022416}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Doesn't deliver. Defrost. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 10:00, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
  +
  +
== {{VFDn|UnTunes:At First I Was Afraid}} ==
  +
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:10, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
# {{Delete}} as discussed on [[User talk:Aleister in Chains#Mexican Canadian War of 1984]]. A winner of the ''WTF and why is it here?'' award. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
+
#{{Delete}} The author is treating a tricky topic, because getting blocked on Uncyclopedia has been treated and re-treated by many different authors, successfully or not. (Consider [[UnBooks:The sad fate of the banned users who escaped into a Sock puppet]] or [[Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal]], for instance) Unfortunately, this article adds no humour value to dozens of other pages and isn't particularly funny, all in all. But it has good rhyme. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 14:10, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Delete promptly.}} No one will ever look for this article (except Anon, overnight) and no one cares about author's random history-of-the-future (set in 1984 only because 1984 is a meme). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:19 17-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} No, it is Gaynor's original that has a good rhyme. This article reminds us that Christmas is approaching and, with it, marketeers' belief that tweaking a carol into a jingle is the world's least-heavy-lifting method of gathering a commission. (To be picky, he was actually blocked from Wikipedia, but documenting one's reaction is [[navelism]], not good comedy.) To boot, author signs his work, and apologizes in-line for not creating an audio. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:23 26-Oct-14</small>
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#This poem is so ''straight''. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141026154901}}
#{{Delete}} yet another Wacky War with an old meme thrown in. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:57, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete|Nope}}. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 10:41, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Charles Darwin]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|George Foreman Lean Meat Fat Reducing Killing Machine}} ==
*Please discuss the global issue further at [[Forum:Crapspaces]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:50 17-Feb-13</small>
+
{{Votervfd|time=10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=14:27, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Was linked to here from [[Alice in Chains]], and as it turns out, [[Special:Whatlinkshere/George Foreman Lean Meat Fat Reducing Killing Machine|lots of articles]] link to here as well. There may be some in-joke I'm not getting, but I'm not sure. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:27, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:The many links are because it is used in the [[:Template:Game Consoles|template]] at the bottom of the article. If deleted, I'll fix that. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:36 26-Oct-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Except for a goofy name no one will look for in any encyclopedia, the article offers little humor beyond the concept and a contrived acronym. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:36 26-Oct-14</small>
  +
#This article is so bad, Uncyclopedia is going to take your name off it and toss it in the dustbin. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141026162445}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} I'm throwing this out to see if we want to trim back the UnQuotable project. I support its deletion, because scattershot lists of quotes are not funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*[[Unquotable]] is a parody of Wikiquote. This means that it's essentially a scattershot of lists of quotes. Some of these are okay, given that it's a very limited frame. Most of them are terrible. And [[Unquotable:Steven Wright]]<ref>Now deleted, independent of the issues discussed here; a cut-and-paste from an external humor website. -Spike</ref> has recently been recreated, and as with previous incarnations is pretty woeful. While I'd agree with a massive trim on these pages (which I went through and trimmed out a lot of these a year ago, but VFD'd few of them), the namespace has it's place. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 17 Feb}}
 
*:Just because Wikipedia does something doesn't mean we should copy it. An example is the fork's recent "UnVoyage" which is likely to turn into Ultra-Towncruft, if it isn't forgotten in a few months. While the unquotable format does parody an actual thing, it is not particularly conducive to writing good material. There is no good reason why there should be a quote page by Charles Darwin, and not one by, say Preggobear. I could create a quote page for Preggobear, but anything I can say there can be , and probably is, said better in paragraph format in the mainspace article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:18, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::Yeah, but if we tried to do a [[Captain Oblivious]] article it... well, you can see what I ended up doing with it. I've trimmed this particular page down now to remove some of the worst quotes. (Although I agree - I see no value in UnVoyage. It'll go much the same way as UnBestiary in the end.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:17 17 Feb}}
 
*:::My issue is that you are saving weak articles by moving them out of mainspace into a "crapspace" for lack of a better term. Articles like [[Captain Oblivious]] should stand or fall on their own merits, not hide their flaws behind a namespace. It would like moving '''Robotic ghost pirates''' to '''UnLegacyRandumbo:Robotic ghost pirates''' instead of taking it to VFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::::Except that I didn't think it was VFD worthy. I felt it had merit, but not in the “frame” of mainspace. Otherwise we should delete UnDictionary because all the articles are stubs. Under that “frame”, this article works. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
----
 
<references />
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Avogadro]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Finland (Facts)}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:21, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A themeless and endless list of "facts," vanity, and inside jokes (including Finnish-language jokes) beckoning Anon like a Sandbox beckoning a passing cat. [[UN:LIST]] says that pages that are "nothing but lists" can be deleted administratively. (My recent enhancements reworded this rule but did not create the rule.) However, {{U|Rangeley}} created this lump of listcruft in 2006, so we ought to vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 28-Oct-14</small>
  +
#I'm sorry, was there a point here? I seem to have missed it. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141029100436}}
  +
#{{Delete}} Some of the "facts" were funny, but they should be written (in non-bulletpoint format) into the article on [[Finland]]. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 10:18, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Word Salad]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|The Who: My Re-Generation}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=10:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Even though it's a featured article, it's an exact copy of much of the page on [[the Who]]. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 10:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
+
#{{Keep}} The FA is in better shape than [[The Who]], which I would vote to delete and redirect to the FA. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:46 29-Oct-14</small>
|delete=#{{delete}} random for the sake of random. This has been kept twice, but it has been 3 years since it has been taken to VFD. It has only 1 mainspace link, so I am guessing no-one really cares about it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:I think it would be a better idea to paste the contents of the FA into [[the Who]], since it is unnecessary to have. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 21:44, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} I can't add to my argument in its last VFD; but in the one before that, before I arrived, it had overwhelming support: Don't delete until Romartus has had a say. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:45 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Longinus]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Think fast, douche-fag! }} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:29, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The reader is a douche-fag. Haha! {{User:Anton199/sig}} 14:29, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Rants at the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:47 29-Oct-14</small>
  +
#Think fast, douche-straight, or we'll delete your article! {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141030011830}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} red-link laden randumbo from 2006 that survived this long mainly due to mentioning kitten huffing. Although it has been edited a few times since 2006, it is still the same article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Pick a topic. Pick a meme. Shuffle. The result is filler. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:49 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War III-XX]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Nobel Peace Prize }} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=14:30, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=0
  +
|delete=
  +
<s>#{{Delete}} Listy, ''quoty'' and not funny. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 14:30, October 29, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
+
#{{Keep}} I rewrote the Intro and {{U|Anton199}} and I have been slimming down the table. Already keepable. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>17:42 29-Oct-14</small>
|delete=#{{delete}} a wacky war from the 31st century between Coke and Pepsi involving Harrison Ford, Tome Cruise, and Chuck Norris. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep|Nomination withdrawn}} I agree - it's keepable. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:51, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Per above. There used to be World War articles on every number between III and about XV, and we got rid of all; did this one survive merely from our fatigue? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:47 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Having just written [[Malala Yousafzai]] (and had a hand in [[Barack Obama]]), it might be good if this page became a sort of Disambiguation Page to our articles on actual award-winners. Failing that, it should be deleted as it is a huge list whose entries are name + wisecrack. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:55 29-Oct-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[JC-bashers]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|A Midsummer Night's Dream}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=14:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The author was asked to fix this article, but he never did. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 14:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 16-Feb-13</small>
 
#I like [[Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers]], but I also like [[An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective]]. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've heard “JC bashers” used as a term for any grass roots Christian evangelist movement. It's not a common phrase here either though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
+
*Currently a long list of characters with author's opinion about how crappy each is or how little anyone cares. Could Romartus attack this one? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:57 29-Oct-14</small>
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Jizzlam}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=20:32, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{delete|Did I already say masturbate?}} Indeed, this article consists almost entirely of masturbation, with a few references to religion around the edges that aren't clever enough to make it funny. [[User:Nikau/Jizzlam]] does it much better. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141029203229}}
  +
#{{Delete|Replace.}} Nikau's version is far better; see its nomination at VFH for further discussion. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:36 29-Oct-14</small>
  +
#{{Replace}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:24, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} An attack page that targets Christianity more than it does Islam. I could be wrong as far as "more than" is concerned, but the article is ''waaay'' too tedious to read through and judge entirely (which makes me doubt the VFH template at the top is genuine). [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 15:18, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#'''Delete'''. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:43 16 Feb}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small>
+
*This is probably the wrong place to say this, but [[Talk:Flying toasters]] isn't much better: The images on {{tl|delete}} and {{tl|VFDn}} are shot. The latter one especially bothers me because they have a practical use--as links for doing various things to the article. Since they're just letters, perhaps they should be replaced with regular links to avoid not only inconveniences like this one but potentially overzealous ad blockers. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141029203640}}
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
 
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:45 16-2-'13
 
*::::Do we have a limit? My personal limit is 1; as when yesterday I cut out a section of [[Bear wrestler]] with no original comedy, designed only to share a TV show with other Uncyclopedians. Which is as close as you come to comedy in the deleted sections. We appreciate the work of cops but not enough to allow roughing up detainees; and we benefit from your skill but not when you use the website to catalog the rants of a commentator you disagree with. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:27 17-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::::I just visited [[Bear wrestler]]. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered it wasn't about hairy homosexual gladiators. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:34 17 Feb}}
 
*On a related note, I found [[Unquotable:Glenn Beck]] which is similarly themed, although it is written like a bad uncyclopedia rather than a bad liberaladvocacypedia article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|That time I was nearly raped by an Oscar Wildebeest during my sojourn in wherever Oscar Wildebeests come from}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=10:44, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=3
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Sorry, Mhaille, but I really think the My sojourn formula here spoils the humour more than it benefits it. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 10:44, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Another copycat article from our Era of Imitation. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:23 30-Oct-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Considering how many "my sojourn" have ended up in VFD since I've joined (and all have retardedly long titles), can someone explain what they are? [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 15:20, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
== {{VFDn|Supergirl/classic/short}} ==
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
{{VFDt|time=14:36, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} I don't get the point of this page. We already have [[Supergirl]] and even [[Supergirl/classic]]. Also, not funny. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 14:36, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Cannibalism/mutilation Humor? Pages need subpages of subpages? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:44 30-Oct-14</small>
  +
#We do not need to melt our readers' brains. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141030160243}}
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 16:02, October 30, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit The Last World War H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 462 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. In depth analysis, stage-by-stage using maps, of a made-up conflict that only the author cares about. Complete with made-up statistics like "123,456" as well. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:49, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote It is occasionally criticized for being slightly destructive. The intro--from which that sentence is taken--looked promising, but the descriptions of the conflict didn't do anything for me. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:27 11 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This article about nothing keeps begging for editors' time to fix it up, while never inducing anyone to take control and make it funny. See also Comments. Spıke ¬ 12:05 13-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Sorry, but I found it funny, especially the maps. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:27, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I voted Symbol keep vote Keep last time based on Aleister doing work, a commitment that he says in the ballot he never made. I had been moved at the concept of the unknowability of a Last War; now I find the concept undeveloped and I think the bit about humanity going extinct and the author being a panda is dumb. Llwy is working on it, but the maps Anton199 likes suggest to me comic book, not encyclopedia; and the problem is the text, which needs a better comedy theme than "War so nutty!" Spıke ¬ 16:48 11-Oct-14
    All I did was fix some spelling and formatting, and I don't see myself doing any more; I wouldn't overestimate me. It's more readable now, but no funnier. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:56 11 Oct 2014

edit Good Electricity and Bad Electricity H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 434 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A tiny bit of pseudo-intellectualism. Might fit on Illogicopedia. Spıke ¬ 14:04 12-Oct-14
  2. Agreed. I'll stick it there right now. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:36 12 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny. ConCass2 (talk) 10:13, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • It's well written. I'm inclined to leave it, so that it may pleasantly surprise those who stumble across it. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:19, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

edit Arsene Wenger H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 386 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am nominating this to try to achieve improvements to, not deletion of, this article on the football manager by some editor Over There. I am not even sure whether getting thrown out of a cinema relates to anything. As it stands, the initial and recurring theme is Pedo/Anal/Rape/SexWithBlackMen Humor. Spıke ¬ 13:17 14-Oct-14
  2. Can't we just delete this? I don't see anyone stepping forward to help. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 21:32 18 Oct 2014
    We can and will, if we prevail in the vote. Spıke ¬ 01:27 19-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Something I could work on but this existing article is crap. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:58, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I'm not sure what's supposed to happen here, but you might be interested in this slightly more sanitary version. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 17:36 14 Oct 2014
    It is much cleaner, but it is also from 2007, and presumably omits comedy based on news in the last seven years — I assume there is some. Is there a Brit in the house who would like to do a merge? Spıke ¬ 18:11 14-Oct-14

edit Laptop H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 273 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Obnoxious teenagers who talk to their parents like shit were caused by laptops. This article begins with the premises that laptops are useful for viewing porn and are 'three dimensional magic box[es]', then goes on to discuss... essentially nothing. It has been almost the same since it was rewritten in 2007; prior to that, it wasn't much better (It is project with much effort, but it not marketable and usable. Then he exploded.). I have a replacement at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Laptop. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 06:34 19 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Intro also has a list of memes and a junk acronym; pointless Section 2 is overwhelmed by illustrations; then nothing but listcruft until the trite finale: Laptops are actually alien lifeforms. Proposed replacement is not ready.... Spıke ¬  10:47, 19 October 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Detailed editing comments moved to replacement article's talk page. Spıke ¬ 17:04 19-Oct-14
  • Not sure if this is the right place to say this, but I've tried to follow your suggestions, Spike, and would appreciate it if you could have another look. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 20:08 23 Oct 2014

edit Igpay Atinlay H T D

Score: 3 • voting closed
Elapsed Time: 269 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Replace. 1 gimmick, 0 jokes (may be more than 0 but it's too tedious to scan the article to see if there are jokes). Page title with gimmick applied to it ensures no one will search for it, or they will get exactly what they expected and will not laugh. Spıke ¬ 10:38 19-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. How the Hell did it not cross the author's mind that nobody can read this page? (Unless this is a prime example of the author trying to amuse himself out of confusing the readers) ConCass2 (talk) 20:32, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Replace with non-Pig Latin version, and probably move to Pig Latin (unless there's something there, in which case I'm not sure what we do). I am no scholar of Pig Latin and I find it about as bothersome to read as do Spike and ConCass, but I found the actual content somewhat amusing. I strongly encourage anyone whose main or sole criterion for voting delete was its unreadability to read the English version and reconsider. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 22:53 20 Oct 2014
    Changing above vote to Replace. That was a fun read. How can anyone on a humor wiki prefer a page that is merely a perfect encoding? Spıke ¬ 22:55 20-Oct-14
  4. Replace b Replace. or something. The actual content is pretty good and the main problem seems that the article is hard to read. It would be good if it was replaced by Llwy's "translated" version, but the original should probably be kept as a subpage and linked to in the See also section, because there are people who will actually find reading the page in Pig Latin more amusing than reading it in English. Also, the page doesn't have to be deleted at all: the original one could be kept where it is now, and Llwy's version can be pasted at Pig Latin... Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:19, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    And you don't need a vote of VFD to replace a redirect that doesn't delete an Uncyclopedian's substantive work. But I won't flip my vote anyway; I don't want the gimmicky version to exist, because editors spend time polishing the codification that they could spend writing funny stuff. I recently tweaked HTBFANJS#Pages that look like the things they're about to be a little more disapproving; for instance, to cite only articles that have more than a gimmick, versus articles that pursue a gimmick unusually well. Spıke ¬ 16:31 21-Oct-14
    Have moved the plaintext article to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect. Spıke ¬ 23:49 23-Oct-14
    We could also have the Pig Latin and English versions side by side in the same article, with a table or something. That seems like enough of a compromise to satisfy everyone to some extent. In any case, I hope we preserve the history instead of just deleting the thing and moving 'mine' on top, because the real authors should be given credit. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 22:47 21 Oct 2014
    No, please! We ought not put fairness to previous authors on a par with having an article hang together and look good. A link is OK, for readers who really want Pig Latin in Pig Latin; but presenting him with multiple versions at once distracts him for the sake of someone's vanity. Spıke ¬ 13:55 23-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I think it's kind of cute. I got a laugh out of it. Granted, it's a little hard to read, but I think it should stay in Pig Latin -- it just seems totally appropriate. Snarglefoop (talk) 22:43, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Igpay Atinlay H T D bis

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 160 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Having moved the plaintext version to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect to Igpay Atinlay, do voters still want the article about Pig Latin in Pig Latin to go away? I do. Spıke ¬ 23:49 23-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. If we have the article in English, having a duplicate in unreadable Pig Latin is stupid and unnecessary. ConCass2 (talk) 12:58, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    As I said above, I think we should have one. I found reading the page on Pig Latin in Pig Latin quite amusing and very Uncyclopedia-like past-time. I know many people who will actually laugh when they see it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:09, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    Does it imply that no future Uncyclopedian should edit Pig Latin without (groan!) keeping Igpay Atinlay in synch? Spıke ¬ 13:15 25-Oct-14
    I think that's going to be up to the editor who will want to make any changes to Pig Latin. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:30, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. OK, Symbol keep vote Keep. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:14, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Could it be a subpage maybe? (I have no opinion.) -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:13 24 Oct 2014
    In fact, it could stay right where it is, though I'd rather it not. Spıke ¬ 10:18 25-Oct-14
  • As per what I said in the first nomination, I think we should keep it somewhere. If it stays right where it is, it should have a link to the plain English version right at the beginning, however. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:25, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    That would be a Symbol keep vote Keep. Spıke ¬ 10:40 25-Oct-14

edit That Guy You Hate H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 263 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Gay humour. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:51, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A non-encyclopedic chat about no one. The title plus the template ("This page...is completely worthless") plus the Intro ("let's do some quality bitching about that little fucker") should keep the reader from reading further. Spıke ¬ 17:07 19-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote I'm gonna tear off his Penis and use it as a toilet plunger. Yet more disgusting gay-bashing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:47 20 Oct 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Strangely, the profanity knocks back the humour and makes the article less funny. But the subject has potential for a good page and doesn't look like something thrown together by an anon in 5 minutes. ConCass2 (talk) 20:36, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
    You mean it has potential for a good page, but it isn't one right now? If it's not good now, it shouldn't remain in its current state. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:47 20 Oct 2014
    I mean it can be redeemed with editing, without having to rewrite the whole page. I just couldn't word it right. ConCass2 (talk) 20:29, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Short Circuit H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 255 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No redeeming qualities. Spıke ¬ 00:21 20-Oct-14
  2. With an article like this, I can't imagine that seeing the movies would make me think any better of it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 18:55 20 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing but sex. ConCass2 (talk) 20:12, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I'm not a fan of humour about sex but the immature part of my brain did make me laugh while reading this and I can't vote to delete something that made me laugh so I'll vote to keep. We ought to cater for all humour types as long as it is a parody. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:06, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Just wondering of you've even seen the movies, Spike? --ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 03:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    I have not. I was not evaluating the movies. The Uncyclopedia page is a start-to-finish Anal Sex Joke. Spıke ¬ 12:12 20-Oct-14
  • Yeah, try watching them!--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 23:45, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    No offence but... you are saying that the content of the movies somehow justifies the article's consisting entirely of sex jokes (and no, Spike, it's not just anal sex)? I can't really see that. Perhaps you could summarise the plot points you were parodying, for the benefit of us lazy bums who can't be bothered to watch the movies? -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:53 20 Oct 2014
    Actually nevermind--I read Wikipedia's article, and I really can't see either the value of turning it into one long sex joke or the attributes of the movie that inspired you to do so. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:58 20 Oct 2014
  • I still recommend watching the movie so you know what you're reading about. I can't see any reason someone who doesn't know what an article is about would find anything funny about it if they don't get it. If that's the case, I could spend the next week adding VFD to so many articles on this site.--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 09:41, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    I know perfectly well what I'm reading about, as I said above. I could guess what the movie was about from your article, actually. There is nothing that can justify turning it into what you turned it into. Nothing. Besides, the article shouldn't require intimate knowledge of the subject matter to be comprehensible; if it does, and if many readers haven't got that knowledge, it probably shouldn't exist. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 13:38 21 Oct 2014
    Yeah cause alot of people just read random articles they know nothing about. My point is, it's not funny to you few people, yet the ones I showed it to found it pretty funny indeed. I just don't agree that the small majority of voters against something is able to rule out an article as being unfunny, just because it's not the type of humor they enjoy. So what it comes down to, is if it doesn't please you couple of people who have time to vote for peoples work to be deleted because you don't personally like it, that means it should not exist for those who do. right? I dunno, maybe it's non Australians not getting Australian humor? Too bad there is no Uncylcopedia.com.au I guess.--ManiacJaSg-Maniac1075Complain Here 15:33, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    Seems a large dollop of short pants to me but suggest you ask Frosty or PuppyOnTheRadio as they're from the Land of Oz for their views. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:15, October 27, 2014 (UTC)

edit Owl H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 232 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Wow, I just... don't even know where to begin. This article is almost entirely random nonsense; it barely has a concept--that of documenting and/or parodying the O RLY meme, which probably won't go over too well with some people here, and I'm not fond of it either--and that's only after I cut out a lot of it. Prior to my edits, it really was about nothing. A much more cut-down version may be found at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/scratchpad, which I'm still not too happy with (though you are welcome to say you want that as the replacement). I feel like we should have an article on owls, but I have no clue what it should consist of, and it's certainly not what we have now. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 23:30 20 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nominator cleaned it up a lot, but it's still a ramble. Spıke ¬ 13:27 21-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:27, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Nude figure-skating H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 196 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A dumb ramble. Spıke ¬ 11:41 22-Oct-14
  2. Fails to live up to the wonderfully silly premise of being naked in a situation that so clearly calls for warm clothing. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 02:24 24 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Doesn't deliver. Defrost. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:00, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit UnTunes:At First I Was Afraid H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 97 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The author is treating a tricky topic, because getting blocked on Uncyclopedia has been treated and re-treated by many different authors, successfully or not. (Consider UnBooks:The sad fate of the banned users who escaped into a Sock puppet or Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal, for instance) Unfortunately, this article adds no humour value to dozens of other pages and isn't particularly funny, all in all. But it has good rhyme. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:10, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. No, it is Gaynor's original that has a good rhyme. This article reminds us that Christmas is approaching and, with it, marketeers' belief that tweaking a carol into a jingle is the world's least-heavy-lifting method of gathering a commission. (To be picky, he was actually blocked from Wikipedia, but documenting one's reaction is navelism, not good comedy.) To boot, author signs his work, and apologizes in-line for not creating an audio. Spıke ¬ 14:23 26-Oct-14
  3. This poem is so straight. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 15:49 26 Oct 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Nope. ConCass2 (talk) 10:41, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit George Foreman Lean Meat Fat Reducing Killing Machine H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 97 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Was linked to here from Alice in Chains, and as it turns out, lots of articles link to here as well. There may be some in-joke I'm not getting, but I'm not sure. ConCass2 (talk) 14:27, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
    The many links are because it is used in the template at the bottom of the article. If deleted, I'll fix that. Spıke ¬ 14:36 26-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Except for a goofy name no one will look for in any encyclopedia, the article offers little humor beyond the concept and a contrived acronym. Spıke ¬ 14:36 26-Oct-14
  3. This article is so bad, Uncyclopedia is going to take your name off it and toss it in the dustbin. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:24 26 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Finland (Facts) H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 49 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A themeless and endless list of "facts," vanity, and inside jokes (including Finnish-language jokes) beckoning Anon like a Sandbox beckoning a passing cat. UN:LIST says that pages that are "nothing but lists" can be deleted administratively. (My recent enhancements reworded this rule but did not create the rule.) However, Rangeley created this lump of listcruft in 2006, so we ought to vote. Spıke ¬ 14:21 28-Oct-14
  2. I'm sorry, was there a point here? I seem to have missed it. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 10:04 29 Oct 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Some of the "facts" were funny, but they should be written (in non-bulletpoint format) into the article on Finland. ConCass2 (talk) 10:18, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit The Who: My Re-Generation H D Featured Tag article

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 29 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Even though it's a featured article, it's an exact copy of much of the page on the Who. ConCass2 (talk) 10:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. The FA is in better shape than The Who, which I would vote to delete and redirect to the FA. Spıke ¬ 10:46 29-Oct-14
    I think it would be a better idea to paste the contents of the FA into the Who, since it is unnecessary to have. ConCass2 (talk) 21:44, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Think fast, douche-fag! H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 25 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The reader is a douche-fag. Haha! Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:29, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Rants at the reader. Spıke ¬ 14:47 29-Oct-14
  3. Think fast, douche-straight, or we'll delete your article! -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 01:18 30 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Nobel Peace Prize H T D

Score: -2
Elapsed Time: 25 hours
Delete (0)

#Symbol delete vote Delete. Listy, quoty and not funny. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:30, October 29, 2014 (UTC)

Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I rewrote the Intro and Anton199 and I have been slimming down the table. Already keepable. Spıke ¬ 17:42 29-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Nomination withdrawn I agree - it's keepable. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:51, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Having just written Malala Yousafzai (and had a hand in Barack Obama), it might be good if this page became a sort of Disambiguation Page to our articles on actual award-winners. Failing that, it should be deleted as it is a huge list whose entries are name + wisecrack. Spıke ¬ 14:55 29-Oct-14

edit A Midsummer Night's Dream H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 25 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The author was asked to fix this article, but he never did. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:38, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Currently a long list of characters with author's opinion about how crappy each is or how little anyone cares. Could Romartus attack this one? Spıke ¬ 14:57 29-Oct-14

edit Jizzlam H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 19 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Did I already say masturbate? Indeed, this article consists almost entirely of masturbation, with a few references to religion around the edges that aren't clever enough to make it funny. User:Nikau/Jizzlam does it much better. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 20:32 29 Oct 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote Replace. Nikau's version is far better; see its nomination at VFH for further discussion. Spıke ¬ 20:36 29-Oct-14
  3. Replace b Replace. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:24, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. An attack page that targets Christianity more than it does Islam. I could be wrong as far as "more than" is concerned, but the article is waaay too tedious to read through and judge entirely (which makes me doubt the VFH template at the top is genuine). ConCass2 (talk) 15:18, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is probably the wrong place to say this, but Talk:Flying toasters isn't much better: The images on {{delete}} and {{VFDn}} are shot. The latter one especially bothers me because they have a practical use--as links for doing various things to the article. Since they're just letters, perhaps they should be replaced with regular links to avoid not only inconveniences like this one but potentially overzealous ad blockers. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 20:36 29 Oct 2014

edit That time I was nearly raped by an Oscar Wildebeest during my sojourn in wherever Oscar Wildebeests come from H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 5 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sorry, Mhaille, but I really think the My sojourn formula here spoils the humour more than it benefits it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:44, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another copycat article from our Era of Imitation. Spıke ¬ 11:23 30-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Considering how many "my sojourn" have ended up in VFD since I've joined (and all have retardedly long titles), can someone explain what they are? ConCass2 (talk) 15:20, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Supergirl/classic/short H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. I don't get the point of this page. We already have Supergirl and even Supergirl/classic. Also, not funny. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 14:36, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Cannibalism/mutilation Humor? Pages need subpages of subpages? Spıke ¬ 14:44 30-Oct-14
  3. We do not need to melt our readers' brains. -– Llwy-ar-lawr talk contribs 16:02 30 Oct 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects