Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Mexican Canadian War of 1984)
({{VFDn|Blexicans}}: new section)
 
(4,488 intermediate revisions by 72 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Wasp}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} ''"War with the Hornet(1500-2009) (The only section worth reading in this shitty article)"'' sums it up nicely. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Photo-less article's theme is dog turds, then the article itself, bickering with itself. I presume that, in 2007, the Rabbi was still amused at being an author and not so experienced as to do it right. Includes memes (Dubya? WMD?) and nonsense numbers. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:04 7-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} The rambling first sentence was almost enough to make me tear my eyes out. Get rid. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>07:51, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#Rabbi Techno's original seems fine, and held my interest enough to actually read the whole thing. Could use work and pictures though. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 20:23 7-4-14
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Welsh Congo}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=2
== [[Unquotable:Litterbox]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Un-encyclopedic and random. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Pointless and unfunny. Has nothing to say. Poor effort. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>07:49, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Back in 2006, {{U|some user}} created a copy of the [[sandbox]] in quotespace. Literally. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} An alternate namespace no more needs its own Sandbox than, well, the F.C.C. needs its own judges and welfare system. Happily, this aberration we can get rid of without a union grievance. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:03 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} No need for this redundancy. The quotes on this page aren't even that funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:01, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*A Welsh version of the Belgian (''et al.'') Congo could be fun if written by someone who knew something about Wales (other than its native translation) and about Africa. I've cleared up the worst here but it still lacks a reason to exist. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:11 7-Apr-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes in Piratespeak]], [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]],[[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Alexander Graham Bell}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=1
+
{{VFDt|time=19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=#{{keep}} I like the idea of these other "languages", and the unquotable pages are classic examples of these other faux languages. Besides, removing these pages should be a decision put off until the fate of the Unquotable namespace is decided, since they are linked to on the main page of the Unquotable namespace, and would require a change to that page. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} Argh matey. This be unquotes in piratespeak. Shiver me timbers and hoist the mizzen mast. Make this land-lubbing article walk the plank and send it to Davy Jones's locker. Avast, ye scalawags: yo-ho-ho and a bottle of rum. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Could have sworn that ''Groundhog Day'' has passed, but I keep seeing the same page over and over. Nominator counted 37 pages in this namespace: How many are prank copies of the same text? (Don't spend time researching that question....) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Random. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
+
#{{Delete}} Do something with it, other than this randomness loosely bound to "Georg Dobbeyer Büch" (sadly, only a piped link to the usual Bush article). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:14 7-Apr-14</small>
|comments=*'''Clarification.''' There about about 65 pages, 37 of which are "real articles". This type of stuff is not counted as a "real article". There are <s>two</s> three more repeats of the mainpage. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:47, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} What a shame. It starts off well, or at least until: "...the inventor of the microwave oven.", but then steadily goes down hill from there until the writer (and reader) seemingly loses the plot. Lack of focus and planning. Get rid. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>08:13, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
*:'''Yikes!''' We have allowed more than one article per VFD nomination, provided you specify exactly what is to be deleted when nominating, and you don't mind having the vote be all-or-nothing. Hint, hint. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 18-Feb-13</small>
+
|keepnumber=1
*::Iz admin, go ahead and do it. Other three are [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]], and the somewhat "different" [[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:59, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keep=
*:::By consensus of the only voters so far, it is so ordered. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:09 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#The original isn't horribly bad. Or it can be deleted and redirected to [[Homophone]], the article that almost turned me gay. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 20:25 7-4-14
*:::PS--The Français page is a disambig over to our French counterpart, something we should not put ourselves in the business of doing except via the Sidebar; the Obfuscata illustrates something that should be a canon rule: The bonus points for "writing an article in the style of the thing it's about" should have a big red warning sign for the repetitive, the gratuitously confusing, and the otherwise very bad, which this one is. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:14 18-Feb-13</small>
+
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_on_Wheels]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Alternate universe}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} another unquotable reskin. This was has formatting to make it look vandalized. Largely untouched since 2006. Apparently, adding "ON WHEEELS" randomly and repeatedly was funny back in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Did the <s>vandal</s> author know that a VFD template was coming when he wrote his SPAN with absolute positioning to overlay it? I had a notion to hack this prank away, but I hope and expect the entire page will meet its maker soon. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:30 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A main page that tries to be exactly the opposite of our main page. It's not very funny or even consistent in what it does ("Vote for featured image" instead of "Vote for the image with the worst quality", for example). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} This page is ugly, and really doesn't add much of anything, and isn't even close to another "language", doesn't teach n00bs anything either. It can go. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Lame attempts at humor through rote translation of our main pages should use Babel instead. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 14-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Cobblers. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>07:55, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
  +
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=#{{Keep}} I like it. Simple and effective. For someone like me before I joined Uncyc this kind of page just made me laugh because it just ridicules the idea of an encyclopedia such as wikipedia. Only on Uncyclopedia can you get this. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 15:52, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Made me laugh, cry, salivate, and then hiccup. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 18:50 20-4-14
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Dumbass]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Lightning}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Memish and lacks humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete|"Has been scientifically proven."}} Gassy phrases like this, and gassy [[UNQUOTE|initial quotations]], will drive away the reader even before the Intro ends and the reader finds nothing left but dumb lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:29 21-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Lord above, what tripe. Such a compelling subject reduced to someone's boring babbling bilgewater. Get rid. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>07:53, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This is a basically a reskin of [[Unquotable:Main_Page]]. And by reskin, I mean text change. This is essentially the same article as it was in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} And the "text change" is to vulgar (not even original-vulgar but vulgar in the style of Dumbass). Amusing to the author (creatively named {{U|Some user}}, sigh), not clever for the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:04 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Dumb but not amusing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:42, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[:Category:Things Retards Believe]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Adjective}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:16, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Another category by which to slap a tag on an article that you simply dislike the subject. Used in userspace and, of course, on [[Fox News]]. A clever insult is one thing; saying retards believe it is drive-by listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} First person. No humour. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
#'''Yep''' per below {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
+
#{{Delete|"You are a FUCKING asshole."}} Stand-up comedy by an unfunny person. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:27 21-Apr-14</small>
#{{delete}} Insult category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} I agree Sir Scott, first-person dribble. It has no place on Uncyclopedia. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>07:57, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
|comments=
 
*Comment: While this has no value by itself, the subcategories themselves are worth keeping, and preferably in a common area. A rename to something along the lines of “[[This page does not exist|Category:Lies for the gullible]]” or the ilk would work. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:36 18 Feb 2013}}
 
*:{{Delete}} The subcategories will survive the deletion of this category, as will, of course, the pages in the category. Apart from the un-P.C. reference to "retards," this category is an epithet with no cleverness. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:05 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I know. I just think the deletion leaves a category gap. It's a stupid cat, though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
 
*:::Most categories are in multiple meta-categories, so category deletion does not create a gap. If this category is deleted, [[:Category:Ineffective Left Wing Propaganda]], [[:Category:Nasty Right Wing Bitches‎]], [[:Category:Political Bullshit‎]], and [[:Category:Politicians‎]] will no longer be sub-sub-categories of [[:Category:Retards]]. So it isn't destroying any information, other that a "People who politics I dislike, and therefore insult (immaturely)" category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
==[[Debate]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:46, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
#{{delete|Delete and redirect}} to [[UnDebate:Main Page]]. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 17 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, do exactly that. Some day a student on the debate team will write an article with serious ridicule of that experience. That will beat the crap out of this long ramble that treats debate as yet another Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:40 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} per above. I lost interest in this article about halfway through the sample debate, and couldn't be bothered to read all of it, it's that bad. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Mexican Canadian War of 1984]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Admiral Ozzel}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:42, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Some good concepts however poorly written and mainly quotes. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The surfeit of quotes is easily fixable with a switchblade. The lack of humor, regarding a minor character in the ''Star Wars'' series, is not. Parents are "Incompetent Peep and Incompetent Person," and that is as close to funny as it gets. Confusion with ''Star Trek'' could be a theme but author takes it nowhere. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:30 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Who on Earth would search for this cack? Get rid. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>07:58, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
# {{Delete}} as discussed on [[User talk:Aleister in Chains#Mexican Canadian War of 1984]]. A winner of the ''WTF and why is it here?'' award. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete|Delete promptly.}} No one will ever look for this article (except Anon, overnight) and no one cares about author's random history-of-the-future (set in 1984 only because 1984 is a meme). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:19 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} yet another Wacky War with an old meme thrown in. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:57, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Charles Darwin]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Norbit}} ==
*Please discuss the global issue further at [[Forum:Crapspaces]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:50 17-Feb-13</small>
+
{{Votervfd|time=10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
{{VFDt|time=07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keepnumber=0
+
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Not funny, slightly memish and poorly written. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} When a sensationally bad film of notable detritus is funnier than it's Uncyclopedia page there's a problem. It needs a complete rewrite... {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>08:05, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
+
#{{Keep}} Read the outrageous plot at [[WP:Norbit#Plot]]. This blax-self-ploitation flick must get serviced by Uncyclopedia. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 21-Apr-14</small>
|delete=#{{delete}} I'm throwing this out to see if we want to trim back the UnQuotable project. I support its deletion, because scattershot lists of quotes are not funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:And now has been. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:31 22-Apr-14</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*[[Unquotable]] is a parody of Wikiquote. This means that it's essentially a scattershot of lists of quotes. Some of these are okay, given that it's a very limited frame. Most of them are terrible. And [[Unquotable:Steven Wright]]<ref>Now deleted, independent of the issues discussed here; a cut-and-paste from an external humor website. -Spike</ref> has recently been recreated, and as with previous incarnations is pretty woeful. While I'd agree with a massive trim on these pages (which I went through and trimmed out a lot of these a year ago, but VFD'd few of them), the namespace has it's place. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 17 Feb}}
+
*... And no, I'm not bloody well rewriting it! {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>08:05, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
*:Just because Wikipedia does something doesn't mean we should copy it. An example is the fork's recent "UnVoyage" which is likely to turn into Ultra-Towncruft, if it isn't forgotten in a few months. While the unquotable format does parody an actual thing, it is not particularly conducive to writing good material. There is no good reason why there should be a quote page by Charles Darwin, and not one by, say Preggobear. I could create a quote page for Preggobear, but anything I can say there can be , and probably is, said better in paragraph format in the mainspace article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:18, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::Yeah, but if we tried to do a [[Captain Oblivious]] article it... well, you can see what I ended up doing with it. I've trimmed this particular page down now to remove some of the worst quotes. (Although I agree - I see no value in UnVoyage. It'll go much the same way as UnBestiary in the end.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:17 17 Feb}}
 
*:::My issue is that you are saving weak articles by moving them out of mainspace into a "crapspace" for lack of a better term. Articles like [[Captain Oblivious]] should stand or fall on their own merits, not hide their flaws behind a namespace. It would like moving '''Robotic ghost pirates''' to '''UnLegacyRandumbo:Robotic ghost pirates''' instead of taking it to VFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::::Except that I didn't think it was VFD worthy. I felt it had merit, but not in the “frame” of mainspace. Otherwise we should delete UnDictionary because all the articles are stubs. Under that “frame”, this article works. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
----
 
<references />
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Avogadro]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Taking candy from strangers}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Random. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} A thoroughly tedious read, about nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:02 21-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Word Salad]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Evil Illuminati Adolf Hitler Clone Society}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Poorly written, awful and not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} 2006-cruft; a Wacky Organization full of memes and devoid of humor. Repeated references to "Noam Particular" are and always have been red-links, with or without the middle name. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:28 22-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} random for the sake of random. This has been kept twice, but it has been 3 years since it has been taken to VFD. It has only 1 mainspace link, so I am guessing no-one really cares about it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I can't add to my argument in its last VFD; but in the one before that, before I arrived, it had overwhelming support: Don't delete until Romartus has had a say. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:45 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Longinus]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Adult}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Listcruft and mainly images near end. Not funny. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Promising intro. I deleted the picture-book and other cruft. What is left is two gender-based tedious lists revolving around puberty and sex organs. Delete that and there would be almost nothing left. It ought to be saved, but there really is nothing funny about adulthood. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:36 22-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} red-link laden randumbo from 2006 that survived this long mainly due to mentioning kitten huffing. Although it has been edited a few times since 2006, it is still the same article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Pick a topic. Pick a meme. Shuffle. The result is filler. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:49 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
#I deleted the listcruft, and added some text. Check it out and see what you think. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 04:38, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War III-XX]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|That time I was plundered in the ass by a Viking during my voyage to a retirement villa}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The title is promising, but the article isn't. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:22 22-Apr-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} a wacky war from the 31st century between Coke and Pepsi involving Harrison Ford, Tome Cruise, and Chuck Norris. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Per above. There used to be World War articles on every number between III and about XV, and we got rid of all; did this one survive merely from our fatigue? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:47 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[JC-bashers]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|That time NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE during my sojourn on the internet}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=12:23, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} This one is worse; provocation of black readers with utterly no comedy payback. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:23 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Racist or not, this article is shite. Get rid. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>08:24, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
  +
#<s>Actually, the concept of this page is explained well [[Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive228#That_time_NIGGERS_STOLE_MY_PAGE_during_my_sojourn_on_the_internet|here]]. But with the original [[NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE]] article deleted, it doesn't really make sense. Sorry, Al. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:35, April 22, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
#The page is one of the most anti-racist pages we have here on uncy. In it's 2011 VFD attempt, in which it was [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive228#That_time_NIGGERS_STOLE_MY_PAGE_during_my_sojourn_on_the_internet saved by a vote of -6], some people understood that. I've just added more to make it clearer. The illustration, by the way, is a white man dressed up in blackface making fun of another white man dressed up in blackface. The links on the page take people to some of the original writing, but the page stands alone in explanation as a guy typing in his mother's basement. I'll add more to it later. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 13:15 22-4-14
|delete=#{{delete}} Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
#With a link to the original page and more additions, it seems good enough to be kept. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 17:33, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 16-Feb-13</small>
 
#I like [[Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers]], but I also like [[An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective]]. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've heard “JC bashers” used as a term for any grass roots Christian evangelist movement. It's not a common phrase here either though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Patch Adams}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} There are many reasons for this nomination, and one of this, that many people agree with, is that if it was written by an anonymous editor, Patch Adams would probably be deleted immediately after its creation. I don't think Uncyclopedia benefits from such articles. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Not an Uncyclopedia article. Also: not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:25 22-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} This is an image, not an article. Get rid. {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>08:26, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13
+
#Not my favorite but many people love it for reasons unknown, and the concept was well explained somewhere. So for posterity I will hold my nose and vote to keep. [[user:Aleister|Aleister]] 13:22 22-4-14
|delnumber=2
+
#:The concept doesn't change the fact that it is short and not extremely funny. Plus, as [[Uncyclopedia:VFH/Patcher Adams|Puppy once explained]], the image doesn't go well with the article. Even if the concept is clever, it will still be short and not extremely funny. Plus, the image still won't fit in the article. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:26, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#'''Delete'''. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:43 16 Feb}}
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
 
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:45 16-2-'13
 
*::::Do we have a limit? My personal limit is 1; as when yesterday I cut out a section of [[Bear wrestler]] with no original comedy, designed only to share a TV show with other Uncyclopedians. Which is as close as you come to comedy in the deleted sections. We appreciate the work of cops but not enough to allow roughing up detainees; and we benefit from your skill but not when you use the website to catalog the rants of a commentator you disagree with. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:27 17-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::::I just visited [[Bear wrestler]]. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered it wasn't about hairy homosexual gladiators. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:34 17 Feb}}
 
*On a related note, I found [[Unquotable:Glenn Beck]] which is similarly themed, although it is written like a bad uncyclopedia rather than a bad liberaladvocacypedia article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
=Archived VFD Discussions=
+
== {{VFDn|Fuk u americkan pigs}} ==
{{VFDarchive}}
 
   
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
+
{{VFDt|time=11:51, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
+
|delnumber=4
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} A dialogue between an anonymous editor and {{u|Happytimes}}. I don't think it belongs to the main space. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:51, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Indeed it doesn't. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:42 23-Apr-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Navelism/Vanity. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 16:24, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Some people have too much time on their hands and think that ''playing'' with themselves in front of other people is funny. It isn't (unless you're dressed up as a gimp). {{User:Macboswell/sig}}<small>08:29, April 24, 2014 (UTC)</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}
   
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
+
== {{VFDn|Blexicans}} ==
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
+
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
+
{{VFDt|time=22:49, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
+
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Blexicans, you see, are a cross between Blacks and Mexicans, which no reader will type to read this lifeless mix of trite stereotypes of Blacks and trite stereotypes of Mexicans. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:49 24-Apr-14</small>
  +
|keepnumber=0
  +
|keep=
  +
|comments=
  +
}}

Latest revision as of 22:49, April 24, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by Nick123 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Wasp H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 411 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "War with the Hornet(1500-2009) (The only section worth reading in this shitty article)" sums it up nicely. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:44, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Photo-less article's theme is dog turds, then the article itself, bickering with itself. I presume that, in 2007, the Rabbi was still amused at being an author and not so experienced as to do it right. Includes memes (Dubya? WMD?) and nonsense numbers. Spıke ¬ 23:04 7-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. The rambling first sentence was almost enough to make me tear my eyes out. Get rid. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  07:51, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Rabbi Techno's original seems fine, and held my interest enough to actually read the whole thing. Could use work and pictures though. Aleister 20:23 7-4-14
Comments

edit Welsh Congo H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 411 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Un-encyclopedic and random. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:49, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pointless and unfunny. Has nothing to say. Poor effort. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  07:49, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • A Welsh version of the Belgian (et al.) Congo could be fun if written by someone who knew something about Wales (other than its native translation) and about Africa. I've cleared up the worst here but it still lacks a reason to exist. Spıke ¬ 23:11 7-Apr-14

edit Alexander Graham Bell H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 410 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:50, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Do something with it, other than this randomness loosely bound to "Georg Dobbeyer Büch" (sadly, only a piped link to the usual Bush article). Spıke ¬ 23:14 7-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. What a shame. It starts off well, or at least until: "...the inventor of the microwave oven.", but then steadily goes down hill from there until the writer (and reader) seemingly loses the plot. Lack of focus and planning. Get rid. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  08:13, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. The original isn't horribly bad. Or it can be deleted and redirected to Homophone, the article that almost turned me gay. Aleister 20:25 7-4-14
Comments

edit Alternate universe H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 250 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A main page that tries to be exactly the opposite of our main page. It's not very funny or even consistent in what it does ("Vote for featured image" instead of "Vote for the image with the worst quality", for example). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:19, April 14, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lame attempts at humor through rote translation of our main pages should use Babel instead. Spıke ¬ 12:23 14-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Cobblers. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  07:55, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I like it. Simple and effective. For someone like me before I joined Uncyc this kind of page just made me laugh because it just ridicules the idea of an encyclopedia such as wikipedia. Only on Uncyclopedia can you get this. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:52, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Made me laugh, cry, salivate, and then hiccup. Aleister 18:50 20-4-14
Comments

edit Lightning H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 87 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Memish and lacks humour. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "Has been scientifically proven." Gassy phrases like this, and gassy initial quotations, will drive away the reader even before the Intro ends and the reader finds nothing left but dumb lists. Spıke ¬ 19:29 21-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Lord above, what tripe. Such a compelling subject reduced to someone's boring babbling bilgewater. Get rid. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  07:53, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adjective H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 87 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. First person. No humour. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:31, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote "You are a FUCKING asshole." Stand-up comedy by an unfunny person. Spıke ¬ 19:27 21-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. I agree Sir Scott, first-person dribble. It has no place on Uncyclopedia. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  07:57, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Admiral Ozzel H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 87 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Some good concepts however poorly written and mainly quotes. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:36, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The surfeit of quotes is easily fixable with a switchblade. The lack of humor, regarding a minor character in the Star Wars series, is not. Parents are "Incompetent Peep and Incompetent Person," and that is as close to funny as it gets. Confusion with Star Trek could be a theme but author takes it nowhere. Spıke ¬ 12:30 22-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Who on Earth would search for this cack? Get rid. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  07:58, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Norbit H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 87 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not funny, slightly memish and poorly written. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:40, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. When a sensationally bad film of notable detritus is funnier than it's Uncyclopedia page there's a problem. It needs a complete rewrite... GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  08:05, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Read the outrageous plot at WP:Norbit#Plot. This blax-self-ploitation flick must get serviced by Uncyclopedia. Spıke ¬ 12:23 21-Apr-14
    And now has been. Spıke ¬ 12:31 22-Apr-14
Comments
  • ... And no, I'm not bloody well rewriting it! GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  08:05, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

edit Taking candy from strangers H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 87 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:43, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. A thoroughly tedious read, about nothing. Spıke ¬ 12:02 21-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Evil Illuminati Adolf Hitler Clone Society H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 84 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Poorly written, awful and not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:08, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. 2006-cruft; a Wacky Organization full of memes and devoid of humor. Repeated references to "Noam Particular" are and always have been red-links, with or without the middle name. Spıke ¬ 12:28 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Adult H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 84 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Listcruft and mainly images near end. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:24, April 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Promising intro. I deleted the picture-book and other cruft. What is left is two gender-based tedious lists revolving around puberty and sex organs. Delete that and there would be almost nothing left. It ought to be saved, but there really is nothing funny about adulthood. Spıke ¬ 12:36 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  1. I deleted the listcruft, and added some text. Check it out and see what you think. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:38, April 23, 2014 (UTC)

edit That time I was plundered in the ass by a Viking during my voyage to a retirement villa H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 58 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The title is promising, but the article isn't. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:21, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Spıke ¬ 12:22 22-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit That time NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE during my sojourn on the internet H T D Survivor

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 58 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This one is worse; provocation of black readers with utterly no comedy payback. Spıke ¬ 12:23 22-Apr-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Racist or not, this article is shite. Get rid. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  08:24, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Actually, the concept of this page is explained well here. But with the original NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE article deleted, it doesn't really make sense. Sorry, Al. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 12:35, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. The page is one of the most anti-racist pages we have here on uncy. In it's 2011 VFD attempt, in which it was saved by a vote of -6, some people understood that. I've just added more to make it clearer. The illustration, by the way, is a white man dressed up in blackface making fun of another white man dressed up in blackface. The links on the page take people to some of the original writing, but the page stands alone in explanation as a guy typing in his mother's basement. I'll add more to it later. Aleister 13:15 22-4-14
  2. With a link to the original page and more additions, it seems good enough to be kept. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 17:33, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Patch Adams H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 57 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. There are many reasons for this nomination, and one of this, that many people agree with, is that if it was written by an anonymous editor, Patch Adams would probably be deleted immediately after its creation. I don't think Uncyclopedia benefits from such articles. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:17, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not an Uncyclopedia article. Also: not funny. Spıke ¬ 13:25 22-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is an image, not an article. Get rid. GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  08:26, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Not my favorite but many people love it for reasons unknown, and the concept was well explained somewhere. So for posterity I will hold my nose and vote to keep. Aleister 13:22 22-4-14
    The concept doesn't change the fact that it is short and not extremely funny. Plus, as Puppy once explained, the image doesn't go well with the article. Even if the concept is clever, it will still be short and not extremely funny. Plus, the image still won't fit in the article. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:26, April 22, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

edit Fuk u americkan pigs H T D Survivor

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 34 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A dialogue between an anonymous editor and Happytimes. I don't think it belongs to the main space. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:51, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Indeed it doesn't. Spıke ¬ 12:42 23-Apr-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Navelism/Vanity. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:24, April 23, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Some people have too much time on their hands and think that playing with themselves in front of other people is funny. It isn't (unless you're dressed up as a gimp). GUN   SIR  MAC  BOSWELL  Knightssword   [†]  08:29, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Blexicans H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 0 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Blexicans, you see, are a cross between Blacks and Mexicans, which no reader will type to read this lifeless mix of trite stereotypes of Blacks and trite stereotypes of Mexicans. Spıke ¬ 22:49 24-Apr-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Personal tools
projects