No keep votes.

1. Delete. Denza and I watched Anon blank sections and we discussed this ambiguously. I claim this is not an essential article of an encyclopedia but an effort by gamers to document and inform, not to amuse, even though there is some token wackiness thrown in. Spıke ¬ 01:50 17-Jun-13
2. Delete.Per above. But some things are okay, so I may create a userspace bit for some of the content for later user. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 02:01, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

• After glancing at the page for a minute I thought that it had a nice concept and that the list form couldn't be avoided. I won't decide to vote keep until I have read it however I do not see much wrong with it. Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 06:30, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

No keep votes.

1. Delete. A wasteland of lists and of nonsense numbers, stopping briefly to rant about the victuals served at the SJHSM cafeteria. I bring this here hoping that one of Uncyclopedia's gourmands will step forward and save it. Spıke ¬ 02:57 16-Jun-13
2. Delete. Perhaps someone could make a How To: Cook Spahgetti. Right now there isn't much of an article, but lots of list. Needs (completely) rewritten or deleted in my opinion. --Uncycloperson (talk) 03:47, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
3. Delete. Too listy, I thought that there would be much more humor on spaghetti. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 04:11, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

1. Keep. To be clear, Sheffield has 6 Members of Parliament, including deputy prime minister Nick Clegg but not including Nigel Farage. Using Farage as a meme is inexplicable but might be an attempt at a running joke, and doesn't by itself disqualify the article. Topical humor is better than random humor; but the question is not whether this is the best anyone can do but whether it is truly awful. Spıke ¬ 02:26 15-Jun-13
2. Keep. IT needs a bit of care and attention, nothing more. Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 06:19, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

1. Delete. Unfunny article. Heavily references politician Nigel Farage despite no visible links between him and the city, and contains little in the way of humour related to the place itself. Certainly no better than the numerous deleted incarnations of the page that have preceded it. -- Rabies Turtle 23:27, June 14, 2013 (UTC)

No keep votes.

1. Delete. Article about nobody is a hint for Anons to type anything, and they do. Everyone, use the Sandbox for this. Spıke ¬ 12:22 14-Jun-13
2. Delete. Buuuuurn it!-- Sir Sinner ^{blah blah} 11:48, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
3. Delete. Per above. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 02:02, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
4. Delete. Awful. Summed up by: "Q: Is Yngwie human?

A: No, actually, he is a balloon full of vodka." Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 06:26, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

No keep votes.

1. Delete. This flagrantly ugly page may be amusing to fanboys of the said group; however, on Uncyclopedia, it will always be a moron magnet. Spıke ¬ 23:01 13-Jun-13
2. Delete. Ick. Baaad.--Uncycloperson (talk) 22:01, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
3. Who loves bad articles? Encyclopedia Dramatica, maybe, but not I. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 04:08, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
4. Delete.Rid us of this evil thing. Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 06:04, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

1. Keep. I actually thought this was alright, possibly in the territory of one of our other tags but certainly not in the dark and sticky realms of VFD. --ChiefjusticePS3 06:46, June 15, 2013 (UTC)

1. Delete. Not funny. Pretty true. Makes me fall asleep.--Uncycloperson (talk) 20:23, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
2. Delete. The author of this article was trying to be funny, but is trying harder to evangelize than amuse. The humor is along the lines of, "Everybody look at how wacky we gamers are!" Spıke ¬ 21:07 11-Jun-13
3. Delete. Might as well get rid of it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH 21:26, June 11, 2013 (UTC)

• Nominator got this in before Simsie slapped the {{Fix}} on the article. Spıke ¬ 21:07 11-Jun-13
• Abstain.Hmm, I think this is another salvageable article, like spam, so if it is okay, I could move it to my userspace, and work on it a bit. As much as I dislike Adventure Quest, this is a perfectly valid article topic, but the writing needs work. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 18:18, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
• If you can fix it, do it, but on the main wiki it does not belong. Quite boring until fixed.--Uncycloperson (talk) 00:06, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

1. Keep. I sort of quite liked the concept, mainly that German is the last, and smallest, of the languages. I accept it's likely to be a target for vandals, but if there were some way of forcing people looking for Berlin to go through the page it'd be quite good. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH 23:06, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
2. Keep. I see where the Reverend's coming from it is an intended spoof of the sign and in my mind it works. Perhaps more paragraphs could be added like the history of the sign but at the moment it stands as one of those non-encyclopedic ones that can be accepted because as they are funny. Perhaps it some of the languages the words could actually read phrases that are stereotypical of that country's way of speaking or are that country's stereotype of Americans. For example as a joke add a British English language translation and an Aussie one. The joke works for people who know what Checkpoint Charlie is and a helpful wikipedia template has been provided by author. I do not think the picture is needed but instead a photoshopped version in which the writing on the page is put onto with the picture filling up the page. I will attempt to rewrite how I think the article could look better in my user space however for the moment it is funny. Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 10:00, June 11, 2013 (UTC)

   I have begun working on a potential replacement (if wanted/necessary) here. Any comments on my talk page or the talk page of that article or below would be appreciated. Thanks. Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 10:35, June 11, 2013 (UTC)

1. Delete. It seems that, at one time, to reach the Uncyclopedia article Berlin, you had to pass through Checkpoint Charlie. This is no longer true. (There is no Checkpoint Charlie any more, nor East Berlin, nor East Berlin). All that is left is the same phrase translated into various languages including Cherokee. If there is clandestine humor, English speakers will never know. Spıke ¬ 22:13 10-Jun-13

1. Keep. The concept--novel as interactive book--is passable. Leo Tolstoy becomes Leo Gameboy and the fact that every assertion becomes conditional (depending on choices the reader made "on page 22") is a good running joke. Nominator (who, like me, prefers humor that revolves around the truth) is too bothered by factual errors such as "in Soviet Russia in the late 1700s." There was no need to tell that lie, but neither does it ruin the humor. Do create a proposed replacement article--before deleting or renaming the current one. Spıke ¬ 21:43 3-Jun-13

1. Delete. I think the concept is very bad although some jokes are successful. To save them, I will move the most funny ones to the new article about the real book, which I will try to create soon. Anton (talk) 09:46, June 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Nominator once again unilaterally deprecates "Anna Karenina" by renaming it "Anna Karenina (gamebook)" to clear the way for a different article that he has not yet begun to write, and which maybe will be better than the original, and maybe not. I have undone the move. Spıke ¬ 22:20 1-Jun-13
• I am afraid I do have bad luck in this forum. Well, the only choice I have now is to write about Anna Karenina myself. Anton (talk) 12:08, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

  I regret your misfortune (despite having caused it) and await the funny new article. Spıke ¬ 12:31 9-Jun-13

• Me too, I expect something new to be written by me and it seems to me that I will begin working soon. Anton (talk) 12:48, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

1. Keep. The reason why I did not put this article on VFD but just redirected it to another page is because I don't think this article is worth deleting and the new name is more suitable. Russian Czar is a comedy trio consisting of Tsar (???) and two other national stereotypes? Well, if Anna Pavlova is a mass-killer, than this one is actually worth VFH. Isn't it a specific type of humor? Of course, people who expect an article about Russian Czars, will be surprised to see this and this is why I have renamed it. The word Tsar (Czar) spelled differently is can also be a joke. All in all, I don't think the article is very bad, but even if it is, then it should not be deleted but improved.

P.S.: If you want something about real Russian tsars, I will begin working on it, as soon as I sort out everything connected to Napoleonic wars, Brittany and Anna Pavlova. Anton (talk) 18:57, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

1. Delete. Czar, you see, is a comedy trio consisting of Tsar (???) and two other national stereotypes. The article trafficks in stereotypes and ends up with history-of-the-future. Unfunny. Spıke ¬ 19:08 29-May-13
2. Delete. KKK? Just why? Tsar is spelt 3 different ways in this article (maybe the American way as I gather by Spike's above comment). In standard English "Tsar" is the English name for the Russian ruler. Czar is according to wikipedia (so not too trusty): "an informal title for certain high-level officials in the United States and United Kingdom." I am guessing that it is another English dialect's way of spelling Tsar possibly American. Spelling it Tzar is probably just a made up word joking about the fact Tsar can be spelt many different ways but not a funny joke. Seperately do we have a page on the actual Russian Tsar, as if we do then I think Anton was right in renaming it to show that we are talking about the English comedy group "The Russian Czar" (I have never heard of it and it is possibly made up). Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 19:28, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
3. Delete. Terrible. Scott, both Tsar and Czar are equally acceptable, as they are transliterations from a language with a different alphabet, so there isn't a "correct" spelling, so long as you make the right sounds when speaking it. Using it as a government title is just stupid self-aggrandisement by useless, overpaid sods who can offer no proper contribution to society other than the collective pleasure of the nation on their eventual death. Twats. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH 23:27, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

   Tsar is a translation from a language with a different alphabet but so are many things in English. "Tsar" is the Standard English spelling however I am not annoyed about that. I am annoyed it was spelt three different ways in this article instead of one making the article look unencyclopedic and badly written. Sir ScottPat CUN VFH UnS NotM(talk) 06:21, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

• Anton199, who has had bad luck in this forum recently, is warned elsewhere not to evade the voting here by simply moving the article to a name no one will ever type. Spıke ¬ 19:08 29-May-13