|
|
| (777 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) |
| Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| |
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div> |
|
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div> |
| |
|
|
|
| − |
== [[Unquotable:Litterbox]] == |
+ |
== [[Dementia]] == |
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
{{Votervfd|time=20:36, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
|keepnumber=0 |
| |
|keep= |
|
|keep= |
| − |
|delnumber=4 |
|
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} Back in 2006, {{U|some user}} created a copy of the [[sandbox]] in quotespace. Literally. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} An alternate namespace no more needs its own Sandbox than, well, the F.C.C. needs its own judges and welfare system. Happily, this aberration we can get rid of without a union grievance. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:03 18-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} No need for this redundancy. The quotes on this page aren't even that funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:01, February 19, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13 |
|
| − |
|comments= |
|
| − |
}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
== [[Unquotable:Quotes in Piratespeak]], [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]],[[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] == |
|
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|keepnumber=1 |
|
| − |
|keep=#{{keep}} I like the idea of these other "languages", and the unquotable pages are classic examples of these other faux languages. Besides, removing these pages should be a decision put off until the fate of the Unquotable namespace is decided, since they are linked to on the main page of the Unquotable namespace, and would require a change to that page. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| |
|delnumber=3 |
|
|delnumber=3 |
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} Argh matey. This be unquotes in piratespeak. Shiver me timbers and hoist the mizzen mast. Make this land-lubbing article walk the plank and send it to Davy Jones's locker. Avast, ye scalawags: yo-ho-ho and a bottle of rum. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
|delete= |
| − |
#{{Delete}} Could have sworn that ''Groundhog Day'' has passed, but I keep seeing the same page over and over. Nominator counted 37 pages in this namespace: How many are prank copies of the same text? (Don't spend time researching that question....) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 18-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
#{{Delete}}--{{User:Mimo&maxus/sig8}} 20:36, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13 |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Start over. This article, if done right, should be more than an excuse to dabble in incoherency. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:50 17-May-13</small> |
| − |
|comments=*'''Clarification.''' There about about 65 pages, 37 of which are "real articles". This type of stuff is not counted as a "real article". There are <s>two</s> three more repeats of the mainpage. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:47, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
#{{Delete}} It could be funny but terrible grammar (as you can see even I noticed it) and the absence of any other jokes except for memory loss spoil everything. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:31, May 18, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
*:'''Yikes!''' We have allowed more than one article per VFD nomination, provided you specify exactly what is to be deleted when nominating, and you don't mind having the vote be all-or-nothing. Hint, hint. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 18-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
|comments= It's not encyclopedic but still kind of funny. I'm abstaining. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:39, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
*::Iz admin, go ahead and do it. Other three are [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]], and the somewhat "different" [[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:59, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*:::By consensus of the only voters so far, it is so ordered. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:09 18-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
*:::PS--The Français page is a disambig over to our French counterpart, something we should not put ourselves in the business of doing except via the Sidebar; the Obfuscata illustrates something that should be a canon rule: The bonus points for "writing an article in the style of the thing it's about" should have a big red warning sign for the repetitive, the gratuitously confusing, and the otherwise very bad, which this one is. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:14 18-Feb-13</small> |
|
| |
}} |
|
}} |
| |
|
|
|
| − |
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_on_Wheels]] == |
+ |
== [[People's Glorious Republic of Uukumbamabahalarata]] == |
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
{{Votervfd|time=19:14, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
|keepnumber=0 |
| |
|keep= |
|
|keep= |
| |
|delnumber=3 |
|
|delnumber=3 |
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} another unquotable reskin. This was has formatting to make it look vandalized. Largely untouched since 2006. Apparently, adding "ON WHEEELS" randomly and repeatedly was funny back in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
|delete= |
| − |
#{{Delete}} Did the <s>vandal</s> author know that a VFD template was coming when he wrote his SPAN with absolute positioning to overlay it? I had a notion to hack this prank away, but I hope and expect the entire page will meet its maker soon. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:30 18-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
#{{Delete}} This article from 2005 is a receptacle for whatever unclever Randumbo you want to type. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:14 17-May-13</small> |
| − |
#{{Delete}} This page is ugly, and really doesn't add much of anything, and isn't even close to another "language", doesn't teach n00bs anything either. It can go. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
#{{Delete}} A completely fictional country where all the Uncyclopedia (worst) jokes are situated. In addition to this, it is impossible to pronounce the article's name. Its creator wanted to make a parody on an average African country but didn't really achieve this. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 19:18, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
#:Yup; and the right way to do this and maintain our encyclopedia façade is to pick a country and parody it. Only, that constrains the author to parody something real, rather than go completely freestyle. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:52 17-May-13</small> |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Awful. Why don't they ever learn what encyclopedic means. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 20:23, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|comments= |
|
|comments= |
| |
}} |
|
}} |
| |
|
|
|
| − |
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Dumbass]] == |
+ |
== [[Finnegans Wake]] == |
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
{{Votervfd|time=15:36, May 16, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
|keepnumber=0 |
+ |
|keepnumber=2 |
| − |
|keep= |
|
| − |
|delnumber=2 |
|
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} This is a basically a reskin of [[Unquotable:Main_Page]]. And by reskin, I mean text change. This is essentially the same article as it was in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} And the "text change" is to vulgar (not even original-vulgar but vulgar in the style of Dumbass). Amusing to the author (creatively named {{U|Some user}}, sigh), not clever for the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:04 18-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} Dumb but not amusing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:42, February 19, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|comments= |
|
| − |
}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
== [[:Category:Things Retards Believe]] == |
|
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=12:16, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
| |
|keep= |
|
|keep= |
| |
+ |
#{{Keep}} It's written in the same style as Finnegan's Wake is. In that respect, it's funny. -- [[User:Hipster|<b>HIPSTER</b>]] [[User Talk:Hipster|<font color="red">T)</font>alk]] [[Special:Contributions/Hipster|<font color="red">C)</font>untributions]] [[Special:Block/Hipster|<font color="red">B)</font>an]] 15:09, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
#WWJJD? -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}} |
| |
|delnumber=3 |
|
|delnumber=3 |
| |
|delete= |
|
|delete= |
| − |
#{{Delete}} Another category by which to slap a tag on an article that you simply dislike the subject. Used in userspace and, of course, on [[Fox News]]. A clever insult is one thing; saying retards believe it is drive-by listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 18-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Multilingual gibberish (by 2005 editors, then {{U|Matthlock}}), apropos of nothing. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:36 16-May-13</small> |
| − |
#'''Yep''' per below {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}} |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Just seeing that the first word has no capital letter is bad enough!!! Absolute gibberish. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:46, May 16, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
#{{delete}} Insult category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
#:This stuff is easily fixed, and a page-in-the-style-of-the-thing-it's-about is appropriate. But James Joyce's prose, though "experimental," was not gibberish. I'd vote to defend deliberate, clever gibberish as satire of real gibberish; the present article is just a sandbox. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:43 16-May-13</small> |
| |
+ |
#::I have to admit I know nothing about the topic and simply judged by first read. Didn't realise it was a satire of someone's book. My point stands that it still is a bit random. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 17:05, May 16, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}} I would certainly vote for the deletion of this article if Hipster didn't put his comment which forced me to type "Finnegan's Wake" in Google. Now I understand that it is a parody on the book. However, I still vote for its deletion as this article is still "multilingual rubbish". Its concept was not realized. Article on "J.D. Sallinger" is also a parody on Sallinger's writing style but it is very interesting and funny to read. Finally, the Russian sentence did not make any grammatical sense. Maybe Uncyclopedia needs an article on Finnegan's Wake but definitely not this. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 12:25, May 18, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|comments= |
|
|comments= |
| − |
*Comment: While this has no value by itself, the subcategories themselves are worth keeping, and preferably in a common area. A rename to something along the lines of “[[This page does not exist|Category:Lies for the gullible]]” or the ilk would work. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:36 18 Feb 2013}} |
|
| − |
*:{{Delete}} The subcategories will survive the deletion of this category, as will, of course, the pages in the category. Apart from the un-P.C. reference to "retards," this category is an epithet with no cleverness. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:05 18-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
*::I know. I just think the deletion leaves a category gap. It's a stupid cat, though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}} |
|
| − |
*:::Most categories are in multiple meta-categories, so category deletion does not create a gap. If this category is deleted, [[:Category:Ineffective Left Wing Propaganda]], [[:Category:Nasty Right Wing Bitches]], [[:Category:Political Bullshit]], and [[:Category:Politicians]] will no longer be sub-sub-categories of [[:Category:Retards]]. So it isn't destroying any information, other that a "People who politics I dislike, and therefore insult (immaturely)" category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| |
}} |
|
}} |
| |
|
|
|
| − |
==[[Debate]] == |
+ |
== [[Check If You Are The Polackophob!]] == |
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=13:46, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
{{Votervfd|time=11:39, May 15, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
|keepnumber=0 |
| |
|keep= |
|
|keep= |
| − |
|delnumber=4 |
+ |
|delnumber=1 |
| |
|delete= |
|
|delete= |
| − |
#{{delete|Delete and redirect}} to [[UnDebate:Main Page]]. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 17 Feb}} |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Ranty stereotypes about Poles and their diaspora is disguised as a self-test to reveal the same (certainly not disguised as an encyclopedia article, in which the same stereotypes could be made funny with a little work). An early and ill-advised work of veteran Uncyclopedian {{U|Ptok-Bentoniczny}}. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:39 15-May-13</small> |
| − |
#{{Delete}} Yes, do exactly that. Some day a student on the debate team will write an article with serious ridicule of that experience. That will beat the crap out of this long ramble that treats debate as yet another Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:40 17-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
#{{Delete}} I can think of a many more much funnier ways of making fun of Polish people that don't involve thinking that they are all Jewish. As for lists... {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:24, May 17, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} per above. I lost interest in this article about halfway through the sample debate, and couldn't be bothered to read all of it, it's that bad. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| |
|comments= |
|
|comments= |
| |
}} |
|
}} |
| |
|
|
|
| − |
== [[Mexican Canadian War of 1984]] == |
+ |
== [[Worst 100 Ways of Being a Dick]] == |
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=13:42, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
{{Votervfd|time=11:37, May 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
|keepnumber=0 |
| |
|keep= |
|
|keep= |
| |
|delnumber=3 |
|
|delnumber=3 |
| |
|delete= |
|
|delete= |
| − |
# {{Delete}} as discussed on [[User talk:Aleister in Chains#Mexican Canadian War of 1984]]. A winner of the ''WTF and why is it here?'' award. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}} |
+ |
#{{Delete}} This page can amuse in two ways: (1) Let Anon name a playground pal who is a dick, and (2) let Anon name an opposition politician who is a dick. Amusing to the hack editor and of no benefit to the reader; this is why we strive against listcruft in general. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:37 14-May-13</small> |
| − |
#{{Delete|Delete promptly.}} No one will ever look for this article (except Anon, overnight) and no one cares about author's random history-of-the-future (set in 1984 only because 1984 is a meme). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:19 17-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
#{{Delete}} The list is too long to be read carefully, in addition to this it is not funny at all. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:15, May 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
#:I endorse this comment on Anton's talk page but note that it is hardly unique to this article. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:43 16-May-13</small> |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}}If there was a vote for execution then this so-called article would be number one on my list and number one of the list of my new article: 100 ways of writing dickish articles, which I made up just now after seeing this. I'm surprised that the article itself wasn't on the list. It's mutilated head should be displayed on the main page as a warning to any IP vandals popping by. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 15:21, May 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|comments= |
|
|comments= |
| |
}} |
|
}} |
| |
|
|
|
| − |
== [[Unquotable:Charles Darwin]] == |
+ |
== [[Agent 47]] == |
| − |
*Please discuss the global issue further at [[Forum:Crapspaces]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:50 17-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
{{Votervfd|time=21:05, May 12, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
|keepnumber=0 |
| |
|keep= |
|
|keep= |
| − |
|delnumber=1 |
+ |
*<s>'''Keep''' It is a good article for showing new users what not to do with an article and how not to create an article. It's got a gay attack, it's got really long, useless lists, the agent is an idiot and he is the reader (insults), the agent has auper powers, it's completely off topic and no one would type in Agent 47. The only thing it doesn't have is swearing (didn't see any) but some edits could take care of that. Just move the article to a more appropriate name like, "Article that wants to be deleted" or "Agent 47's vandal attack on an Uncyclopedia article" and you have a good parody. I laughed lots because it was so bad I had to accept that it was a parody of a bad article (which it wasn't (I don't think)).</s> |
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} I'm throwing this out to see if we want to trim back the UnQuotable project. I support its deletion, because scattershot lists of quotes are not funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
*:If you also agree that it should be a parody of an appaling Uncyclopedia article just tell me and I'll give it some minor editing to finish it. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 17:54, May 13, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
*::You had me going back to the page history (as nominator is supposed to do!) to ensure that this isn't a deliberate creation of one of the Old Ones that parodied bad writing so well as to prank Rocko. It is not. Please don't spend much time doing deliberately bad writing. There is enough of this already on the site, much of it referred to at [[Uncyclopedia:In-jokes]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:20 13-May-13</small> |
| |
+ |
*:In that case I shall change my vote. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 14:21, May 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
|delnumber=6 |
| |
+ |
|delete= |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Crimes against humor {{Unsigned|RockoRocks}} |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}} A ''tour-de-force'' of everything people do who can't write humor: Article about nothing, serial listing of memes, pranking the reader with {{Tl|USERNAME}} (though author mistakenly uses {{Tl|USERLINK}}), mentioning gayness and gore for instant laughs, then interminable lists on needless topics such as "people he murdered." {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:16 12-May-13</small> |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Eye-gougingly bad. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 16:14, May 13, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}} There are already numerous examples of what not to do with an article on carlb's mirror, and this belongs in that archive along with numerous VFD non-survivors already there. --{{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 01:44, May 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}}. {{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 14:21, May 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
#{{Delete}} This is the article which no one will read until the end simply because it talks about everything at the same time (which means that it talks about nothing in particular). No idea why it was named Agent 47. Not well written. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:11, May 14, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
|comments= |
|
|comments= |
| − |
*[[Unquotable]] is a parody of Wikiquote. This means that it's essentially a scattershot of lists of quotes. Some of these are okay, given that it's a very limited frame. Most of them are terrible. And [[Unquotable:Steven Wright]]<ref>Now deleted, independent of the issues discussed here; a cut-and-paste from an external humor website. -Spike</ref> has recently been recreated, and as with previous incarnations is pretty woeful. While I'd agree with a massive trim on these pages (which I went through and trimmed out a lot of these a year ago, but VFD'd few of them), the namespace has it's place. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 17 Feb}} |
|
| − |
*:Just because Wikipedia does something doesn't mean we should copy it. An example is the fork's recent "UnVoyage" which is likely to turn into Ultra-Towncruft, if it isn't forgotten in a few months. While the unquotable format does parody an actual thing, it is not particularly conducive to writing good material. There is no good reason why there should be a quote page by Charles Darwin, and not one by, say Preggobear. I could create a quote page for Preggobear, but anything I can say there can be , and probably is, said better in paragraph format in the mainspace article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:18, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*::Yeah, but if we tried to do a [[Captain Oblivious]] article it... well, you can see what I ended up doing with it. I've trimmed this particular page down now to remove some of the worst quotes. (Although I agree - I see no value in UnVoyage. It'll go much the same way as UnBestiary in the end.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:17 17 Feb}} |
|
| − |
*:::My issue is that you are saving weak articles by moving them out of mainspace into a "crapspace" for lack of a better term. Articles like [[Captain Oblivious]] should stand or fall on their own merits, not hide their flaws behind a namespace. It would like moving '''Robotic ghost pirates''' to '''UnLegacyRandumbo:Robotic ghost pirates''' instead of taking it to VFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
*::::Except that I didn't think it was VFD worthy. I felt it had merit, but not in the “frame” of mainspace. Otherwise we should delete UnDictionary because all the articles are stubs. Under that “frame”, this article works. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}} |
|
| − |
---- |
|
| − |
<references /> |
|
| |
}} |
|
}} |
| |
|
|
|
| − |
== [[Avogadro]] == |
+ |
== [[Feroze & Suleiman]] == |
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
{{Votervfd|time=23:56, May 7, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
|keepnumber=0 |
+ |
|keepnumber=1 |
| − |
|keep= |
|
| − |
|delnumber=2 |
|
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
|comments= |
|
| − |
}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
== [[Word Salad]] == |
|
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
| − |
|keep= |
|
| − |
|delnumber=2 |
|
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} random for the sake of random. This has been kept twice, but it has been 3 years since it has been taken to VFD. It has only 1 mainspace link, so I am guessing no-one really cares about it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} I can't add to my argument in its last VFD; but in the one before that, before I arrived, it had overwhelming support: Don't delete until Romartus has had a say. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:45 17-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
|comments= |
|
| − |
}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
== [[Longinus]] == |
|
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
| − |
|keep= |
|
| − |
|delnumber=2 |
|
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} red-link laden randumbo from 2006 that survived this long mainly due to mentioning kitten huffing. Although it has been edited a few times since 2006, it is still the same article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} Pick a topic. Pick a meme. Shuffle. The result is filler. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:49 17-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
|comments= |
|
| − |
}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
== [[World War III-XX]] == |
|
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
| − |
|keep= |
|
| − |
|delnumber=2 |
|
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} a wacky war from the 31st century between Coke and Pepsi involving Harrison Ford, Tome Cruise, and Chuck Norris. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#{{Delete}} Per above. There used to be World War articles on every number between III and about XV, and we got rid of all; did this one survive merely from our fatigue? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:47 17-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
|comments= |
|
| − |
}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
== [[JC-bashers]] == |
|
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|keepnumber=0 |
|
| |
|keep= |
|
|keep= |
| |
+ |
#{{Keep}} This article is okay, yet needs tidying in the quotes dept. later on and a few minor changes to get readers to go 'aha, this is a bunch of bollocks!'. I don't see this as a vanity article as, well, the company clearly doesn't exist. --[[User:TheDarthMoogle|TheDarthMoogle]] ([[User talk:TheDarthMoogle|talk]]) 08:52, May 9, 2013 (UTC) |
| |
+ |
#:The fact that the company doesn't exist is the very proof that authors are not writing about anything but themselves, that is, vanity. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:31 9-May-13</small> |
| |
|delnumber=4 |
|
|delnumber=4 |
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
|delete= |
| − |
#{{Delete}} Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 16-Feb-13</small> |
+ |
#{{Delete}} This article is not poorly written; but Google has only two exact matches for this alleged consultancy: We are the first, and the second is a stub article at a business locator that "located" this business through Uncyclopedia. [[UN:CM|Codeine's Mum]] never worked there. It's a vanity project of a small clique. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:56 7-May-13</small> |
| − |
#I like [[Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers]], but I also like [[An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective]]. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}} |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Concur. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:48, May 9, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
#{{Delete}} Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC) |
+ |
#{{Delete}} I agree with Spike as I saw Codeine's Mum the other day and she said she hadn't heard of it. Also why are the staff members the KKK? Random and pointless.{{User:ScottPat/sig2}} 05:49, May 10, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
|comments= |
+ |
#{{Delete}} Shame someone wasted so much time on it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 16:14, May 13, 2013 (UTC) |
| − |
*I've heard “JC bashers” used as a term for any grass roots Christian evangelist movement. It's not a common phrase here either though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
}} |
|
| − |
|
|
| − |
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] == |
|
| − |
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
|keepnumber=1 |
|
| − |
|keep= |
|
| − |
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13 |
|
| − |
|delnumber=2 |
|
| − |
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| − |
#'''Delete'''. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:43 16 Feb}} |
|
| |
|comments= |
|
|comments= |
| − |
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won. |
|
| − |
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
*:::I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:45 16-2-'13 |
|
| − |
*::::Do we have a limit? My personal limit is 1; as when yesterday I cut out a section of [[Bear wrestler]] with no original comedy, designed only to share a TV show with other Uncyclopedians. Which is as close as you come to comedy in the deleted sections. We appreciate the work of cops but not enough to allow roughing up detainees; and we benefit from your skill but not when you use the website to catalog the rants of a commentator you disagree with. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:27 17-Feb-13</small> |
|
| − |
*:::::I just visited [[Bear wrestler]]. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered it wasn't about hairy homosexual gladiators. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:34 17 Feb}} |
|
| − |
*On a related note, I found [[Unquotable:Glenn Beck]] which is similarly themed, although it is written like a bad uncyclopedia rather than a bad liberaladvocacypedia article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, February 17, 2013 (UTC) |
|
| |
}} |
|
}} |
| |
|
|
|
Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.
Delete.--
Keep. It's written in the same style as Finnegan's Wake is. In that respect, it's funny. -- 
