Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Unquotable:Litterbox)
m ({{VFDn|Undictionary:Fukle}})
 
(5,246 intermediate revisions by 79 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Quiz}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=21:07, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} No comments--{{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 21:07, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete|Replace}}. If anyone would like to take on the task, that is. With an actual ''article'' on quizzes, not a quiz. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:54, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*<s>{{Delete}} The concept is worthwhile, though doesn't get beyond "pages that look like the things they are about." The body is executed with no skill at all, even at typing in English. This would be easy for someone to do well. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:15 23-Jun-14</small></s>
  +
*:'''Rescinded''' after Simsie's work. No longer executed with no skill at all, but still doesn't get beyond "pages that look like the things they are about." [[Exam]] does it better. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>09:32 21-Jul-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
# I made some modifications, and hope it has improved enough. Yes, I made up a word, and some better answers to the questions. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 20:34, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Self Promotion}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=11:07, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
== [[Unquotable:Litterbox]] ==
+
|delete=
{{Votervfd|time=19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Only one joke, and not a very good one (a page that is self promotion). {{User:Anton199/sig}} 11:07, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
|keepnumber=0
+
#{{Delete}} As this piece of vanity has been on the site since 2007, I'll suppress the notion to just huff it administratively. "Look at me, I'm breaking the rule" against planting links to userspace in the encyclopedia. An article on Self Promotion (should be "Self-promotion") that self-promotes is not a joke but a conundrum, and it has nothing else going for it. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:18 24-Jun-14</small>
  +
#:<s>{{Delete}}--{{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 16:51, June 24, 2014 (UTC)</s>
  +
#{{Delete}} Self abuse. Go. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 07:00, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Don't have time to re-write it. Maybe at a much later date as a new article. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=2
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
+
#{{Keep|Keep (Formaly Delete)}} Now that it is rewritten {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 19:57, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} Back in 2006, {{U|some user}} created a copy of the [[sandbox]] in quotespace. Literally. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#:It isn't. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} An alternate namespace no more needs its own Sandbox than, well, the F.C.C. needs its own judges and welfare system. Happily, this aberration we can get rid of without a union grievance. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:03 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#::Well it's better than the old one {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 10:38, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} No need for this redundancy. The quotes on this page aren't even that funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:01, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Keep}} Now that is indeed a joke and not real self-promotion, it may be salvaged. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 22:30, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
#Delete like it's 1999. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 00:52 19-2-'13
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I don't know if it's possible, but is there a way to replace all the links to the reader's userpage instead of the author's? You know, if there is some sort of Template:Username link that would work that way (so that is a joke instead of actual self-promotion)? [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 12:12, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
:*Possible. [[Special:Mypage|Look!]] However, another problem is that it is one of the main jokes, and the content itself is pretty weak. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 15:20, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*Attempting a re-write. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 19:22, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*I'm going to replace the links with Special:Mypage, since I for one really don't give a shit about who User:Dantoller may be. Perhaps we could have one section dedicated to this joke so that it doesn't go stale? [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:40, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*ScottPat replaced the links with links to a FA collaboration of his (and mine); while that is self-promotion, it's hardly clear to the reader. The article is more cryptic than before. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:29 5-Jul-14</small>
  +
*:I didn't just replace links. I attempted to write the article as a sport (it isn't finished only intro done). Looking back the Cotswold Olimpicks thing was overdoing the secondary theme of self promotion but it was more aimed at the appearance of the Olimpicks advertising itself on an encyclopedia instead of me, the author advertising myself, a joke that no one but Spike and I could have got. It hasn't been finished though and probably deserves deletion as I have very little time to finish it. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes in Piratespeak]], [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]],[[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Woof}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#{{keep}} I like the idea of these other "languages", and the unquotable pages are classic examples of these other faux languages. Besides, removing these pages should be a decision put off until the fate of the Unquotable namespace is decided, since they are linked to on the main page of the Unquotable namespace, and would require a change to that page. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Argh matey. This be unquotes in piratespeak. Shiver me timbers and hoist the mizzen mast. Make this land-lubbing article walk the plank and send it to Davy Jones's locker. Avast, ye scalawags: yo-ho-ho and a bottle of rum. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Could have sworn that ''Groundhog Day'' has passed, but I keep seeing the same page over and over. Nominator counted 37 pages in this namespace: How many are prank copies of the same text? (Don't spend time researching that question....) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 18-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=*'''Clarification.''' There about about 65 pages, 37 of which are "real articles". This type of stuff is not counted as a "real article". There are <s>two</s> three more repeats of the mainpage. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:47, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:'''Yikes!''' We have allowed more than one article per VFD nomination, provided you specify exactly what is to be deleted when nominating, and you don't mind having the vote be all-or-nothing. Hint, hint. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*::Iz admin, go ahead and do it. Other three are [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]], and the somewhat "different" [[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:59, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:::By consensus of the only voters so far, it is so ordered. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:09 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::PS--The Français page is a disambig over to our French counterpart, something we should not put ourselves in the business of doing except via the Sidebar; the Obfuscata illustrates something that should be a canon rule: The bonus points for "writing an article in the style of the thing it's about" should have a big red warning sign for the repetitive, the gratuitously confusing, and the otherwise very bad, which this one is. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:14 18-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_on_Wheels]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=09:42, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} After cleaning up this gassy article from 2006, it still has nothing to say about an invented disease. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>09:42 18-Jul-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Doggone, please. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 19:10, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=#{{delete}} another unquotable reskin. This was has formatting to make it look vandalized. Largely untouched since 2006. Apparently, adding "ON WHEEELS" randomly and repeatedly was funny back in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Did the <s>vandal</s> author know that a VFD template was coming when he wrote his SPAN with absolute positioning to overlay it? I had a notion to hack this prank away, but I hope and expect the entire page will meet its maker soon. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:30 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} This page is ugly, and really doesn't add much of anything, and isn't even close to another "language", doesn't teach n00bs anything either. It can go. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Dumbass]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Asexuality}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This is a basically a reskin of [[Unquotable:Main_Page]]. And by reskin, I mean text change. This is essentially the same article as it was in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} And the "text change" is to vulgar (not even original-vulgar but vulgar in the style of Dumbass). Amusing to the author (creatively named {{U|Some user}}, sigh), not clever for the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:04 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Dumb but not amusing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:42, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[:Category:Things Retards Believe]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=18:41, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=12:16, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=1
|keepnumber=0
+
|delete=
  +
#This article may have one or too jokes, but not enough BS and satire to be an Uncyclopedia article. It is basically a slightly "funnier" Wikipedia article. We also already have an article on [[Asexual]].[[User:Grandpafreddie|Grandpafreddie]] ([[User talk:Grandpafreddie|talk]]) 18:45, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
#{{Keep}} It is clear from the first sentence that this article is joking. I don't like the patches of self-reference, but it was voted onto our main page and ought not be deleted. Having multiple articles on related or even identical topics is explicitly permitted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>18:48 18-Jul-14</small>
|delete=
 
#{{Delete}} Another category by which to slap a tag on an article that you simply dislike the subject. Used in userspace and, of course, on [[Fox News]]. A clever insult is one thing; saying retards believe it is drive-by listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#'''Yep''' per below {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
 
#{{delete}} Insult category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Comment: While this has no value by itself, the subcategories themselves are worth keeping, and preferably in a common area. A rename to something along the lines of “[[This page does not exist|Category:Lies for the gullible]] or the ilk would work. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:36 18 Feb 2013}}
+
*I'm no expert, but I'm sure that admins automatically "keep" featured articles or something like that. Also, this article is bigger and much more elaborate than the article you linked to. Speaking of which, why do several articles have duplicates? I mean, there are two different articles for [[dog]] and [[dogs]]. I'm sure we only need one for asexuality. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 18:52, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
*:{{Delete}} The subcategories will survive the deletion of this category, as will, of course, the pages in the category. Apart from the un-P.C. reference to "retards," this category is an epithet with no cleverness. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:05 18-Feb-13</small>
+
*:It is not automatic for me, though deleting an FA should take more than a routine vote at this forum. Most of the other Admins do treat it as a hard-and-fast rule. Again, having only one Uncyclopedia article per subject is a giant non-goal. We explain the utility of multiple competing versions at [[HTBFANJS#Write nonsense well]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:13 19-Jul-14</small>
*::I know. I just think the deletion leaves a category gap. It's a stupid cat, though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
 
*:::Most categories are in multiple meta-categories, so category deletion does not create a gap. If this category is deleted, [[:Category:Ineffective Left Wing Propaganda]], [[:Category:Nasty Right Wing Bitches‎]], [[:Category:Political Bullshit‎]], and [[:Category:Politicians‎]] will no longer be sub-sub-categories of [[:Category:Retards]]. So it isn't destroying any information, other that a "People who politics I dislike, and therefore insult (immaturely)" category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Debate]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Undictionary:Ethnic}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:46, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=17:12, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete|Delete and redirect}} to [[UnDebate:Main Page]]. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 17 Feb}}
+
#{{Delete}} This is more offensive than funny. And I don't even belong to any of the listed ethnic groups. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 17:12, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} Yes, do exactly that. Some day a student on the debate team will write an article with serious ridicule of that experience. That will beat the crap out of this long ramble that treats debate as yet another Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:40 17-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Any humor relies on the belief that "italian, amerindian, jew, asian, oriental, nigger or gypsy" is inherently funny without working at it. We call this fallacy listcruft, even before it gives offense. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:15 20-Jul-14</small>
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#As above {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 19:21, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} per above. I lost interest in this article about halfway through the sample debate, and couldn't be bothered to read all of it, it's that bad. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Yeugh! --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 16:43, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
 
}}
 
 
== [[Mexican Canadian War of 1984]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=13:42, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
# {{Delete}} as discussed on [[User talk:Aleister in Chains#Mexican Canadian War of 1984]]. A winner of the ''WTF and why is it here?'' award. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete|Delete promptly.}} No one will ever look for this article (except Anon, overnight) and no one cares about author's random history-of-the-future (set in 1984 only because 1984 is a meme). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:19 17-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
   
== [[Unquotable:Charles Darwin]] ==
 
*Please discuss the global issue further at [[Forum:Crapspaces]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:50 17-Feb-13</small>
 
{{Votervfd|time=10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=1
 
|delete=#{{delete}} I'm throwing this out to see if we want to trim back the UnQuotable project. I support its deletion, because scattershot lists of quotes are not funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*[[Unquotable]] is a parody of Wikiquote. This means that it's essentially a scattershot of lists of quotes. Some of these are okay, given that it's a very limited frame. Most of them are terrible. And [[Unquotable:Steven Wright]]<ref>Now deleted, independent of the issues discussed here; a cut-and-paste from an external humor website. -Spike</ref> has recently been recreated, and as with previous incarnations is pretty woeful. While I'd agree with a massive trim on these pages (which I went through and trimmed out a lot of these a year ago, but VFD'd few of them), the namespace has it's place. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 17 Feb}}
 
*:Just because Wikipedia does something doesn't mean we should copy it. An example is the fork's recent "UnVoyage" which is likely to turn into Ultra-Towncruft, if it isn't forgotten in a few months. While the unquotable format does parody an actual thing, it is not particularly conducive to writing good material. There is no good reason why there should be a quote page by Charles Darwin, and not one by, say Preggobear. I could create a quote page for Preggobear, but anything I can say there can be , and probably is, said better in paragraph format in the mainspace article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:18, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::Yeah, but if we tried to do a [[Captain Oblivious]] article it... well, you can see what I ended up doing with it. I've trimmed this particular page down now to remove some of the worst quotes. (Although I agree - I see no value in UnVoyage. It'll go much the same way as UnBestiary in the end.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:17 17 Feb}}
 
*:::My issue is that you are saving weak articles by moving them out of mainspace into a "crapspace" for lack of a better term. Articles like [[Captain Oblivious]] should stand or fall on their own merits, not hide their flaws behind a namespace. It would like moving '''Robotic ghost pirates''' to '''UnLegacyRandumbo:Robotic ghost pirates''' instead of taking it to VFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::::Except that I didn't think it was VFD worthy. I felt it had merit, but not in the “frame” of mainspace. Otherwise we should delete UnDictionary because all the articles are stubs. Under that “frame”, this article works. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
----
 
<references />
 
}}
 
   
== [[Avogadro]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Word Salad]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Undictionary:Fukle}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=19:32, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 19:32, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Misspelling the Highland negative conjunction '''fuck-all''' is not funny but merely cutesy. It also guarantees that no one will look up this entry. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:00 21-Jul-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} C.U.Jimmy. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 16:51, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} random for the sake of random. This has been kept twice, but it has been 3 years since it has been taken to VFD. It has only 1 mainspace link, so I am guessing no-one really cares about it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I can't add to my argument in its last VFD; but in the one before that, before I arrived, it had overwhelming support: Don't delete until Romartus has had a say. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:45 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Longinus]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|That kid at the mall}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=19:48, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{delete}} red-link laden randumbo from 2006 that survived this long mainly due to mentioning kitten huffing. Although it has been edited a few times since 2006, it is still the same article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Pick a topic. Pick a meme. Shuffle. The result is filler. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:49 17-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} This is too stupid or me to waste my words on {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 19:48, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Author has someone in mind, but I guess you just had to be there. "That kid at the mall can usually be found in big name stores like Sears, JC Penney, Target and Wal-Mart." Get it? Get it? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:03 21-Jul-14</small>
}}
 
 
== [[World War III-XX]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} a wacky war from the 31st century between Coke and Pepsi involving Harrison Ford, Tome Cruise, and Chuck Norris. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Per above. There used to be World War articles on every number between III and about XV, and we got rid of all; did this one survive merely from our fatigue? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:47 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[JC-bashers]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Eclipse}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=02:11, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=3
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} The only things this page has going for it is (1) randomization of facts in the very first paragraph, and (2) the fact that the article on Eclipse is '''eclipsed''' by a big ellipse. That's clever, then? Yawn. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>02:11 22-Jul-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} As above + You can't read anything {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 10:34, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:If you have a long-rather-than-wide screen, or disable images, you will see that the entire body is a spork of Wikipedia with no humor anywhere. That is: It is not comedy writing but a single pictorial gimmick. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:32 22-Jul-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Dumb. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 16:46, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 16-Feb-13</small>
 
#I like [[Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers]], but I also like [[An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective]]. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've heard “JC bashers” used as a term for any grass roots Christian evangelist movement. It's not a common phrase here either though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#'''Delete'''. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:43 16 Feb}}
 
|comments=
 
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
 
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:45 16-2-'13
 
*::::Do we have a limit? My personal limit is 1; as when yesterday I cut out a section of [[Bear wrestler]] with no original comedy, designed only to share a TV show with other Uncyclopedians. Which is as close as you come to comedy in the deleted sections. We appreciate the work of cops but not enough to allow roughing up detainees; and we benefit from your skill but not when you use the website to catalog the rants of a commentator you disagree with. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:27 17-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::::I just visited [[Bear wrestler]]. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered it wasn't about hairy homosexual gladiators. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:34 17 Feb}}
 
*On a related note, I found [[Unquotable:Glenn Beck]] which is similarly themed, although it is written like a bad uncyclopedia rather than a bad liberaladvocacypedia article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 16:51, July 22, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Poopsmithed by TheWikiMan026 • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Quiz H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 715 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. No comments--TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 21:07, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Replace. If anyone would like to take on the task, that is. With an actual article on quizzes, not a quiz. ConCass2 (talk) 20:54, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote Delete. The concept is worthwhile, though doesn't get beyond "pages that look like the things they are about." The body is executed with no skill at all, even at typing in English. This would be easy for someone to do well. Spıke ¬ 11:15 23-Jun-14
    Rescinded after Simsie's work. No longer executed with no skill at all, but still doesn't get beyond "pages that look like the things they are about." Exam does it better. Spıke ¬ 09:32 21-Jul-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  1. I made some modifications, and hope it has improved enough. Yes, I made up a word, and some better answers to the questions. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:34, July 7, 2014 (UTC)

edit Self Promotion H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 677 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Only one joke, and not a very good one (a page that is self promotion). Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:07, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. As this piece of vanity has been on the site since 2007, I'll suppress the notion to just huff it administratively. "Look at me, I'm breaking the rule" against planting links to userspace in the encyclopedia. An article on Self Promotion (should be "Self-promotion") that self-promotes is not a joke but a conundrum, and it has nothing else going for it. Spıke ¬ 11:18 24-Jun-14
    Symbol delete vote Delete.--TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 16:51, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Self abuse. Go. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:00, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Don't have time to re-write it. Maybe at a much later date as a new article. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep (Formaly Delete) Now that it is rewritten TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 19:57, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
    It isn't. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
    Well it's better than the old one TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 10:38, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. Now that is indeed a joke and not real self-promotion, it may be salvaged. ConCass2 (talk) 22:30, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I don't know if it's possible, but is there a way to replace all the links to the reader's userpage instead of the author's? You know, if there is some sort of Template:Username link that would work that way (so that is a joke instead of actual self-promotion)? ConCass2 (talk) 12:12, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Possible. Look! However, another problem is that it is one of the main jokes, and the content itself is pretty weak. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 15:20, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
  • Attempting a re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:22, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm going to replace the links with Special:Mypage, since I for one really don't give a shit about who User:Dantoller may be. Perhaps we could have one section dedicated to this joke so that it doesn't go stale? ConCass2 (talk) 20:40, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
  • ScottPat replaced the links with links to a FA collaboration of his (and mine); while that is self-promotion, it's hardly clear to the reader. The article is more cryptic than before. Spıke ¬ 10:29 5-Jul-14
    I didn't just replace links. I attempted to write the article as a sport (it isn't finished only intro done). Looking back the Cotswold Olimpicks thing was overdoing the secondary theme of self promotion but it was more aimed at the appearance of the Olimpicks advertising itself on an encyclopedia instead of me, the author advertising myself, a joke that no one but Spike and I could have got. It hasn't been finished though and probably deserves deletion as I have very little time to finish it. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)

edit Woof H D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 103 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. After cleaning up this gassy article from 2006, it still has nothing to say about an invented disease. Spıke ¬ 09:42 18-Jul-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Doggone, please. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:10, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Asexuality H T D Featured Tag article

Score: 0
Elapsed Time: 94 hours
Delete (1)
  1. This article may have one or too jokes, but not enough BS and satire to be an Uncyclopedia article. It is basically a slightly "funnier" Wikipedia article. We also already have an article on Asexual.Grandpafreddie (talk) 18:45, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It is clear from the first sentence that this article is joking. I don't like the patches of self-reference, but it was voted onto our main page and ought not be deleted. Having multiple articles on related or even identical topics is explicitly permitted. Spıke ¬ 18:48 18-Jul-14
Comments
  • I'm no expert, but I'm sure that admins automatically "keep" featured articles or something like that. Also, this article is bigger and much more elaborate than the article you linked to. Speaking of which, why do several articles have duplicates? I mean, there are two different articles for dog and dogs. I'm sure we only need one for asexuality. ConCass2 (talk) 18:52, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
    It is not automatic for me, though deleting an FA should take more than a routine vote at this forum. Most of the other Admins do treat it as a hard-and-fast rule. Again, having only one Uncyclopedia article per subject is a giant non-goal. We explain the utility of multiple competing versions at HTBFANJS#Write nonsense well. Spıke ¬ 03:13 19-Jul-14

edit Undictionary:Ethnic H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 47 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is more offensive than funny. And I don't even belong to any of the listed ethnic groups. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 17:12, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Any humor relies on the belief that "italian, amerindian, jew, asian, oriental, nigger or gypsy" is inherently funny without working at it. We call this fallacy listcruft, even before it gives offense. Spıke ¬ 23:15 20-Jul-14
  3. As above TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 19:21, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Yeugh! --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:43, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Undictionary:Fukle H D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 21 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 19:32, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Misspelling the Highland negative conjunction fuck-all is not funny but merely cutesy. It also guarantees that no one will look up this entry. Spıke ¬ 20:00 21-Jul-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. C.U.Jimmy. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:51, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit That kid at the mall H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 21 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. This is too stupid or me to waste my words on TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 19:48, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Author has someone in mind, but I guess you just had to be there. "That kid at the mall can usually be found in big name stores like Sears, JC Penney, Target and Wal-Mart." Get it? Get it? Spıke ¬ 20:03 21-Jul-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Eclipse H T D

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 14 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. The only things this page has going for it is (1) randomization of facts in the very first paragraph, and (2) the fact that the article on Eclipse is eclipsed by a big ellipse. That's clever, then? Yawn. Spıke ¬ 02:11 22-Jul-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. As above + You can't read anything TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 10:34, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
    If you have a long-rather-than-wide screen, or disable images, you will see that the entire body is a spork of Wikipedia with no humor anywhere. That is: It is not comedy writing but a single pictorial gimmick. Spıke ¬ 11:32 22-Jul-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Dumb. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:46, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects