Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Debate)
m ({{VFDn|Slackware}})
 
(5,676 intermediate revisions by 88 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{deletiondebates|[[UN:VFD]]}}{{VFDRules}}
+
{{VFDr}}
  +
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
  +
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
  +
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
  +
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
  +
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
  +
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
  +
<!-- Do not edit above this line -->
   
=Pages for Deletion=
+
== {{VFDn|Johnson County, Kansas}} ==
{{VFDRules2}}
 
<div style="display: none;">
 
<!-- COPY, do not CUT, the below template, and place it at the TOP of the page, replace "ARTICLE NAME HERE" as appropriate and please remove the arrows and stuff. It's unnecessary to keep that stuff.
 
   
== [[ARTICLE NAME HERE]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=10:31, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=~~~~~
+
|delnumber=3
|keepnumber=0
+
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:31 12-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Small town Kansas Kruft. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
+
#{{Keep}} Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>15:01 24-Aug-14</small>
  +
*There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004137}}
 
}}
 
}}
Don't finagle with with the above template. Seriously. You may succumb to peer pressure.
 
   
And place the VFD tag on the page, dammit! Otherwise, we will scrape your balls with a rusty razor blade! If you don't have balls we are willing to improvise.
+
== {{VFDn|Office etiquette}} ==
   
New nominations at the top of the page below this line; --></div>
+
{{VFDt|time=03:02, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
 
== [[Unquotable:Litterbox]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
|delete=#{{delete}} Back in 2006, {{U|some user}} created a copy of the [[sandbox]] in quotespace. Literally. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:58, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} An alternate namespace no more needs its own Sandbox than, well, the F.C.C. needs its own judges and welfare system. Happily, this aberration we can get rid of without a union grievance. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:03 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that '''this is a humor wiki'''. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>03:02 13-Aug-14</small>
#{{Delete}} No need for this redundancy. The quotes on this page aren't even that funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:01, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} One liners. Not good.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=#I laughed. I don't know why, but I did. Quite a bit, actually. I'm so sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830002847}}
  +
#:Clarification: I found many of the etiquette tips to be funny, but the intro and some tips seem to be serious. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004237}}
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. [[User:Rocketsled|Rocketsled]] ([[User talk:Rocketsled|talk]]) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:58 17-Aug-14</small>
  +
*:I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*{{U|Moonhead42}} is trying to save this. I say on his talk page that it needs more drastic surgery; voters, feel free to kibitz. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:21 30-Aug-14</small>
  +
*:I hate to say it, but I kind of prefer it before his changes. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831024833}}
  +
*::His initial edits were more-of-the-same, but yesterday he seemed to take up my challenge to remedy the overdependence on lists. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>09:54 31-Aug-14</small>
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes in Piratespeak]], [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]],[[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Johnny Gay}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=#{{keep}} I like the idea of these other "languages", and the unquotable pages are classic examples of these other faux languages. Besides, removing these pages should be a decision put off until the fate of the Unquotable namespace is decided, since they are linked to on the main page of the Unquotable namespace, and would require a change to that page. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:36, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Argh matey. This be unquotes in piratespeak. Shiver me timbers and hoist the mizzen mast. Make this land-lubbing article walk the plank and send it to Davy Jones's locker. Avast, ye scalawags: yo-ho-ho and a bottle of rum. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:37, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Could have sworn that ''Groundhog Day'' has passed, but I keep seeing the same page over and over. Nominator counted 37 pages in this namespace: How many are prank copies of the same text? (Don't spend time researching that question....) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:41 18-Feb-13</small>
 
|comments=*'''Clarification.''' There about about 65 pages, 37 of which are "real articles". This type of stuff is not counted as a "real article". There are <s>two</s> three more repeats of the mainpage. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:47, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:'''Yikes!''' We have allowed more than one article per VFD nomination, provided you specify exactly what is to be deleted when nominating, and you don't mind having the vote be all-or-nothing. Hint, hint. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:55 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*::Iz admin, go ahead and do it. Other three are [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Obfuscata]], [[Unquotable:Quotes in Gangsta]], and the somewhat "different" [[Unquotable:Quotes in Français]] --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:59, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
*:::By consensus of the only voters so far, it is so ordered. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:09 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::PS--The Français page is a disambig over to our French counterpart, something we should not put ourselves in the business of doing except via the Sidebar; the Obfuscata illustrates something that should be a canon rule: The bonus points for "writing an article in the style of the thing it's about" should have a big red warning sign for the repetitive, the gratuitously confusing, and the otherwise very bad, which this one is. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:14 18-Feb-13</small>
 
}}
 
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_on_Wheels]] ==
+
{{VFDt|time=01:45, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
{{Votervfd|time=19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>01:45 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Not very funny and not notable enough. <s>I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1ylkdldauc this YouTube video].</s> {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#::But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:08 18-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} Thanks for the meme-ory. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Blah. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830002915}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=3
+
|comments=*The sprites are missing from this article. No idea what's going on. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830004707}}
|delete=#{{delete}} another unquotable reskin. This was has formatting to make it look vandalized. Largely untouched since 2006. Apparently, adding "ON WHEEELS" randomly and repeatedly was funny back in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 19:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Did the <s>vandal</s> author know that a VFD template was coming when he wrote his SPAN with absolute positioning to overlay it? I had a notion to hack this prank away, but I hope and expect the entire page will meet its maker soon. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>19:30 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} This page is ugly, and really doesn't add much of anything, and isn't even close to another "language", doesn't teach n00bs anything either. It can go. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Unquotable:Quotes_in_Dumbass]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Lahore}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=11:05, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>11:38 19-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Delete}} {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#Short and sucky. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830001738}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} This is a basically a reskin of [[Unquotable:Main_Page]]. And by reskin, I mean text change. This is essentially the same article as it was in 2006. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:48, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} And the "text change" is to vulgar (not even original-vulgar but vulgar in the style of Dumbass). Amusing to the author (creatively named {{U|Some user}}, sigh), not clever for the reader. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:04 18-Feb-13</small>
 
#{{Delete}} Dumb but not amusing. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:42, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[:Category:Things Retards Believe]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Dolphin uprising}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=12:16, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Another category by which to slap a tag on an article that you simply dislike the subject. Used in userspace and, of course, on [[Fox News]]. A clever insult is one thing; saying retards believe it is drive-by listcruft. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:16 18-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see [[Emu War]] and [[Animals with feet war with animals with no feet]]. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
#'''Yep''' per below {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
+
#{{Delete}} I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of {{U|Sunoco}} is a waste of time, except to key us to [[:Category:Silly wars]], where other VFD fodder may be found. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:09 25-Aug-14</small>
#{{delete}} Insult category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#Silly wars? We don't need no silly wars. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 03:33, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|keepnumber=1
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} I think it's a funny article that goes well with mine. I don't get why you think that "personal story arcs" are so evil, in this case I believe that continuity between some of the articles improves them overall.{{unsigned|SamTheAwesome}}
  +
#:I can't speak for Spike, but I think continuity is ok as long as the articles are high quality. I also think your article is somewhat funny, for whatever it's worth (which probably isn't a whole lot) and better than [[Dolphin uprising]]. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830001341}}
  +
#::''Anything'' is OK as long as an article is of sufficiently high quality. The problem with story arcs is this: Humor is the highest value for an Uncyclopedian considering new edits to an article; and declining to apply an edit because SamTheAwesome wants [[Dolphin uprising]] to make sense when read alongside [[The Great Whale Invasion]] is a gigantic non-issue with which to burden any Uncyclopedian. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>00:46 30-Aug-14</small>
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*Comment: While this has no value by itself, the subcategories themselves are worth keeping, and preferably in a common area. A rename to something along the lines of [[This page does not exist|Category:Lies for the gullible]]” or the ilk would work. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:36 18 Feb 2013}}
+
*New Uncyclopedian {{U|SamTheAwesome}} has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new [[The Great Whale Invasion]] (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:08 21-Aug-14</small>
*:{{Delete}} The subcategories will survive the deletion of this category, as will, of course, the pages in the category. Apart from the un-P.C. reference to "retards," this category is an epithet with no cleverness. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:05 18-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I know. I just think the deletion leaves a category gap. It's a stupid cat, though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:23 18 Feb 2013}}
 
*:::Most categories are in multiple meta-categories, so category deletion does not create a gap. If this category is deleted, [[:Category:Ineffective Left Wing Propaganda]], [[:Category:Nasty Right Wing Bitches‎]], [[:Category:Political Bullshit‎]], and [[:Category:Politicians‎]] will no longer be sub-sub-categories of [[:Category:Retards]]. So it isn't destroying any information, other that a "People who politics I dislike, and therefore insult (immaturely)" category. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
==[[Debate]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|United Socialist States of America}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:46, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=22:21, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delnumber=3
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
#{{delete|Delete and redirect}} to [[UnDebate:Main Page]]. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:46 17 Feb}}
+
#{{Delete}} Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>22:21 21-Aug-14</small>
#{{Delete}} Yes, do exactly that. Some day a student on the debate team will write an article with serious ridicule of that experience. That will beat the crap out of this long ramble that treats debate as yet another Wacky War. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:40 17-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} Not horrible but too far from the truth to be funny, IMHO. Just kind of dull, really. [[User:Snarglefoop|Snarglefoop]] ([[User talk:Snarglefoop|talk]]) 23:29, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#ConCass2 made it a bit better, but it's still not great. Sorry. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig}} 02:47, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete}} per above. I lost interest in this article about halfway through, and couldn't be bothered to read all of it, it's that bad. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 00:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=2
  +
|keep=
  +
#{{Keep}} It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#:One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:14 25-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{Keep}} {{User:TheWikiMan026/sig}} 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
  +
*{{Comment}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_in_the_USSA], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*:I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. {{User:ScottPat/sig3}} 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
  +
*::Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:12 22-Aug-14</small>
  +
*I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Mexican Canadian War of 1984]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Brian Cowen}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=13:42, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
+
|delnumber=4
|delnumber=3
 
 
|delete=
 
|delete=
# {{Delete}} as discussed on [[User talk:Aleister in Chains#Mexican Canadian War of 1984]]. A winner of the ''WTF and why is it here?'' award. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
+
#{{Delete}} Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. [[User:ConCass2|ConCass2]] ([[User talk:ConCass2|talk]]) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
#{{Delete|Delete promptly.}} No one will ever look for this article (except Anon, overnight) and no one cares about author's random history-of-the-future (set in 1984 only because 1984 is a meme). {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:19 17-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete}} The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since {{U|Dwight K Shrute}} finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>21:45 24-Aug-14</small>
#{{delete}} per above. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:38, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
+
#{{Delete}} Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. {{User:Anton199/sig}} 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
#Ych a fi. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830005121}}
}}
 
 
== [[Unquotable:Charles Darwin]] ==
 
*Please discuss the global issue further at [[Forum:Crapspaces]]. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>13:50 17-Feb-13</small>
 
{{Votervfd|time=10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=1
+
|comments={{Comment}}Feel it should stay in some format but current version is largely abuse. --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 12:12, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
|delete=#{{delete}} I'm throwing this out to see if we want to trim back the UnQuotable project. I support its deletion, because scattershot lists of quotes are not funny. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:59, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
*It has its funny moments even though it's mostly all abuse (although what article on a politician isn't?). I'm not going to vote to save it though. {{User:Captain gull/Sig}} 02:10, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
|comments=
+
*:True. I think the article is just a cleaned up version of [[wikipedia:Brian Cowen|this one]].--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 13:15, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
*[[Unquotable]] is a parody of Wikiquote. This means that it's essentially a scattershot of lists of quotes. Some of these are okay, given that it's a very limited frame. Most of them are terrible. And [[Unquotable:Steven Wright]]<ref>Now deleted, independent of the issues discussed here; a cut-and-paste from an external humor website. -Spike</ref> has recently been recreated, and as with previous incarnations is pretty woeful. While I'd agree with a massive trim on these pages (which I went through and trimmed out a lot of these a year ago, but VFD'd few of them), the namespace has it's place. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:04 17 Feb}}
 
*:Just because Wikipedia does something doesn't mean we should copy it. An example is the fork's recent "UnVoyage" which is likely to turn into Ultra-Towncruft, if it isn't forgotten in a few months. While the unquotable format does parody an actual thing, it is not particularly conducive to writing good material. There is no good reason why there should be a quote page by Charles Darwin, and not one by, say Preggobear. I could create a quote page for Preggobear, but anything I can say there can be , and probably is, said better in paragraph format in the mainspace article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:18, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::Yeah, but if we tried to do a [[Captain Oblivious]] article it... well, you can see what I ended up doing with it. I've trimmed this particular page down now to remove some of the worst quotes. (Although I agree - I see no value in UnVoyage. It'll go much the same way as UnBestiary in the end.) {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:17 17 Feb}}
 
*:::My issue is that you are saving weak articles by moving them out of mainspace into a "crapspace" for lack of a better term. Articles like [[Captain Oblivious]] should stand or fall on their own merits, not hide their flaws behind a namespace. It would like moving '''Robotic ghost pirates''' to '''UnLegacyRandumbo:Robotic ghost pirates''' instead of taking it to VFD. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 13:13, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
*::::Except that I didn't think it was VFD worthy. I felt it had merit, but not in the “frame” of mainspace. Otherwise we should delete UnDictionary because all the articles are stubs. Under that “frame”, this article works. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|01:42 17 Feb}}
 
----
 
<references />
 
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Avogadro]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Mudripper}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=10:56, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=2
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>10:56 29-Aug-14</small>
  +
#Does not jump the bar. {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140830015929}}
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Article consists of immaturely insulting the subject and grues. It is also unlinked from mainspace, besides a couple redirects. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:49, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete|Part-time penis.}} And I do hate it when grues are insulted. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:21 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Word Salad]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Slackware}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=4
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. {{User:Reverend P. Pennyfeather/sig}} 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  +
#{{Delete}} Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>23:55 30-Aug-14</small>
  +
#{{delete|He invented what we call today, "water"}} {{User:Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20140831173146}}
  +
#{{delete}} Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} random for the sake of random. This has been kept twice, but it has been 3 years since it has been taken to VFD. It has only 1 mainspace link, so I am guessing no-one really cares about it. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:43, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} I can't add to my argument in its last VFD; but in the one before that, before I arrived, it had overwhelming support: Don't delete until Romartus has had a say. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:45 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[Longinus]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|My ingenious plan to attack Obama with non-lethal weapons}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
  +
{{VFDt|time=20:42, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
  +
|delnumber=1
  +
|delete=
  +
#{{Delete}} Created during the week [[John McCain]] stated that it wouldn't be the end of the world if Obama were elected. Not exactly Assassination Humor, but has the same problems and is fatally unclever. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>20:42 1-Sep-14</small>
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} red-link laden randumbo from 2006 that survived this long mainly due to mentioning kitten huffing. Although it has been edited a few times since 2006, it is still the same article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:38, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Pick a topic. Pick a meme. Shuffle. The result is filler. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:49 17-Feb-13</small>
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
 
}}
 
}}
   
== [[World War III-XX]] ==
+
== {{VFDn|Stanley Random Chess}} ==
{{Votervfd|time=08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|keepnumber=0
+
{{VFDt|time=14:38, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
|keep=
 
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delnumber=2
|delete=#{{delete}} a wacky war from the 31st century between Coke and Pepsi involving Harrison Ford, Tome Cruise, and Chuck Norris. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 08:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
+
|delete=
#{{Delete}} Per above. There used to be World War articles on every number between III and about XV, and we got rid of all; did this one survive merely from our fatigue? {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:47 17-Feb-13</small>
+
#{{Delete|Stanley Random Article.}} The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:38 2-Sep-14</small>
|comments=
+
#{{Delete}} Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --{{User:Romartus/sig2}} 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
}}
 
 
== [[JC-bashers]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keepnumber=0
 
|keep=
 
|keep=
|delnumber=4
 
|delete=#{{delete}} Randumbo with a hint of advocacy. It has largely been untouched since 2006, except for a wannabe-maintenance template. I think it might be a parody of Jehovah's Witnesses, since it seems that JC-bashers are Christians. (JC = Jesus Christ, I assume). Or maybe JC-bashers are bible thumpers. Whatever this article is supposed to be about, I assume we probably have (or should have) a better version somewhere. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 11:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 
#{{Delete}} Yes, exactly "randumbo with a hint of advocacy." If you are going to take on strident advocates/opponents of a sect (includes Glenn Beck), be playful and not extreme-sounding yourself--and above all, don't write crap. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>12:12 16-Feb-13</small>
 
#I like [[Uncyclopedia:Legal_Department/JCbashers]], but I also like [[An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective]]. I wouldn't want to reinstate the original article in that case either. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
#{{Delete}} Just not funny enough, looks like it was written by an 11 year old, except for the legal department link. That part was funny. {{User:Simsilikesims/sig}} 23:51, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 
 
|comments=
 
|comments=
*I've heard “JC bashers” used as a term for any grass roots Christian evangelist movement. It's not a common phrase here either though. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|12:28 16 Feb}}
 
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
== [[Glenn_Beck_(Asshat)]] ==
 
{{Votervfd|time=14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
|keepnumber=1
 
|keep=
 
#A vital page to keep Glenn Beck's honored name among the people who care most. [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 14:20 15-2-'13
 
|delnumber=2
 
|delete=#{{delete}} and redirect to [[Glenn Beck]]. This is a combination of "I don't like this guy's politics" and a database of Youtube videos. We already have a much better article on the subject. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 14:19, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 
#'''Delete'''. It's a redundancy, and not a good one. SPIKE has improved it, but I don't see a point on having a "passable" article on a topic where we have a "featured" article. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|11:43 16 Feb}}
 
|comments=
 
*As "Uncyclopedia is not a catalog to things found elsewhere on the Net," I've deleted three sections that had no function but to send readers to YouTube. '''Pieces of this article intended to serve up true utterances of Beck by which to discredit him are advocacy, not humor, even if you think he is ridiculously funny.''' Some funny stuff remains <s>and I would like to see it merged into [[Glenn Beck]], as</s> "Asshat" in the title is likewise too busy being advocacy to help the reader reach the article. I assume Aleister's vote is more advocacy rather than a vote. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:31 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:Advocacy? Are we wikipedia now? All the Fred Phelps pages are advocacy, the Hitler pages are too, I guess, and anti-Hitler pages are too, and on and on...[[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] minutes later. I remember when we moved this page to here when Glenn Beck was replaced with the other page, and there was discussion about what to call it, and Asshat won.
 
*::I reply by boldfacing a sentence of my earlier reply. Multiple wrongs don't make a right. The Hitler pages have value added by Uncyclopedians. If you intend to reassemble the YouTube collection that I deleted, please take it to a more suitable website. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:41 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*::I strike part of my earlier reply. [[Glenn Beck]] was a FA and should not receive any orphaned pieces of this article, especially if that is not an improvement. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>16:06 15-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::I recall when Glenn Beck was written there was some discussion about if it should replace this article, which was an established page by that time. We decided sure, as long as this page was kept around, and the discussion of what to name it was heated and laster for about a year (no it didn't, but it was discussed). I don't like the Glenn Beck page itself, it's more of an UnBooks because it's a transcript of Beck's show. This page is more encyclopedic, and I think should have remained the Beck article. And why can't we put the videos back on the talk page????? This seems a suitable place to put them, and to enjoy them at our leisure. Videos work, and many pages use them. Do we have a limit on vids (three sounds reasonable if presented well, with captions and they are appropriate to the page. The vid at UnPoetia:Well-oil birds worked so perfectly you'd think it was designed for the page) and if so, let's put a couple of them back at least. Glenn, we hardly knew ye! [[user:Aleister|''Aleister'']] 12:45 16-2-'13
 
*::::Do we have a limit? My personal limit is 1; as when yesterday I cut out a section of [[Bear wrestler]] with no original comedy, designed only to share a TV show with other Uncyclopedians. Which is as close as you come to comedy in the deleted sections. We appreciate the work of cops but not enough to allow roughing up detainees; and we benefit from your skill but not when you use the website to catalog the rants of a commentator you disagree with. {{User:SPIKE/signature}}<small>14:27 17-Feb-13</small>
 
*:::::I just visited [[Bear wrestler]]. Imagine my disappointment when I discovered it wasn't about hairy homosexual gladiators. {{User:PuppyOnTheRadio/sig3|02:34 17 Feb}}
 
*On a related note, I found [[Unquotable:Glenn Beck]] which is similarly themed, although it is written like a bad uncyclopedia rather than a bad liberaladvocacypedia article. --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 10:50, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
 
=Archived VFD Discussions=
 
{{VFDarchive}}
 
 
[[Category:Articles deleted by Lyrithya at some point]]
 
[[Category:Uncyclopedia deletion]]
 
[[Category:Pages repeatedly nominated on VFD]]
 
 
[[es:Inciclopedia:VPB]]
 
[[id:Tolololpedia:PUP]]
 
[[ko:포럼:세탁소]]
 
[[pt:Desciclopédia:Eliminação de páginas]]
 

Latest revision as of 20:42, September 2, 2014

Shortcut:
UN:VFD
Deletion Policy
QuickVFD
Votes for deletion

Intensive Care Unit

del log

The goal here is to improve the quality of Uncyclopedia, not to win a vote. You can edit a page during a vote. You can flip your vote if the page improves or if other voters convince you.

To nominate a page for deletion
  • Read these rules and the deletion policy.
  • Do not increase the number of active nominations on VFD to over 20, as a 1 day ban often offends. (Inactive votes, which are grayed out, don't count in the limit of 20.)
  • Please check an article's history before nominating it. If there has been vandalism, revert it to the best past version. Also, check the article's talk page to see if it is in Category:Deletion Survivor. If so, Special:WhatLinksHere will find the relevant VFD archive(s); read about how the previous vote(s) went.
  • Add {{VFD}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
  • If an article survives VFD, do not resubmit it for at least 1 month.

Add a new article here


How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages)

To vote to delete or keep an article
  • Edit the section for the article in question.
  • To vote, start a new line at the end of the delete= or keep= section, beginning with #. This creates a numbered entry. Do not put a space before #. Increment the delnumber or keepnumber, whichever applies.
    • To post brief indented replies to a vote, start lines with #: with one or more colons; anything else breaks the numbered list.
  • To type a comment, start a new line at the end of the comments= section, beginning with * (as comments need not be numbered).
  • Votes with an explanation, and comments, are more helpful in analyzing the quality of an article.
  • ~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.

Do not delete any content without authorization. To change a vote, strike your old one and add a new one. Do not change other users' posts. At least 24 hours must pass before a nomination is closed or an article is deleted.

Moderated by Spike or any Admin • Now hiring for Poopsmith • Engineered by Pup (report bugs here)

edit Johnson County, Kansas H D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 514 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Continual focus on non-celebrity individuals. Spıke ¬ 10:31 12-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Pretty big for an article about a small county. Regardless, it still isn't that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 14:32, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Small town Kansas Kruft. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. Its too personal, but all it needs is minor editing. Rocketsled (talk) 19:38, August 12, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I cleaned up the red-links (some created in anticipation of writing a personal story arc on neighboring counties), the vanity, and the anti-cop rants; but it still has nothing more profound to say than racial minorities, indebtedness, and rude drivers. Classic "towncruft" that, in the case of England, we went on a drive to snuff out earlier in the year. Spıke ¬ 15:01 24-Aug-14
  • There's some funny stuff, and some stuff that didn't register with me. I'm not sure which way to go. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:41, 30 Aug 2014

edit Office etiquette H T D Survivor

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 497 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Totally lists, and mostly unfunny real-world etiquette tips. Anon extended the unfunny today despite my using the Anon talk page to ask him to register and emphasize that this is a humor wiki. Start over, after someone comes up with a comedy strategy. Spıke ¬ 03:02 13-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I rewrote the whole bloody page and lost all my progress. Doing it again would be pointless, so delete. ConCass2 (talk) 09:43, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. One liners. Not good.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:54, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. I laughed. I don't know why, but I did. Quite a bit, actually. I'm so sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:28, 30 Aug 2014
    Clarification: I found many of the etiquette tips to be funny, but the intro and some tips seem to be serious. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:42, 30 Aug 2014
Comments
  • Some of the one liners are funny and can be used elsewhere. I just don't get why there are a bunch of legitimate office etiquette tips in there. The article makes no sense. Rocketsled (talk) 15:51, August 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • I have now backed out Anon's recent edits and reverted the page to 2012. You may flip your vote if you think it makes sense now; I still don't see any humor. Spıke ¬ 11:58 17-Aug-14
    I checked through the history before submitting my vote; I came to the same conclusion as you, so I didn't bother. ConCass2 (talk) 13:18, August 17, 2014 (UTC)
  • Moonhead42 is trying to save this. I say on his talk page that it needs more drastic surgery; voters, feel free to kibitz. Spıke ¬ 11:21 30-Aug-14
    I hate to say it, but I kind of prefer it before his changes. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 02:48, 31 Aug 2014
    His initial edits were more-of-the-same, but yesterday he seemed to take up my challenge to remedy the overdependence on lists. Spıke ¬ 09:54 31-Aug-14

edit Johnny Gay H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 378 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Name of a character not found on Wikipedia is nothing but a vehicle for gay stereotypes. Spıke ¬ 01:45 18-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not very funny and not notable enough. I think that the inspiration for this article was something related to this YouTube video. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:22, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh, I see there was a source in the article before. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:31, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
    But then, this means that the point of the article was to advertise the offsite meme. Spıke ¬ 14:08 18-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Thanks for the meme-ory. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:55, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Blah. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:29, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The sprites are missing from this article. No idea what's going on. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:47, 30 Aug 2014

edit Lahore H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 345 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Very bad and nothing worth saving here. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:06, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The reader doesn't have to visit this ranty article to imagine Lahore being recast as La Whore; and if he does, the article will do nothing more for him. Spıke ¬ 11:38 19-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:52, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Short and sucky. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:17, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Dolphin uprising H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 295 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. A very mediocre article on a made-up war between humans and dolphins. For comparison, see Emu War and Animals with feet war with animals with no feet. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 13:05, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. I am mistaken, below, to say that Sam "addressed" the article; he did nothing but use it to cross-sell his new one. This 2006-07 creation of Sunoco is a waste of time, except to key us to Category:Silly wars, where other VFD fodder may be found. Spıke ¬ 12:09 25-Aug-14
  3. Silly wars? We don't need no silly wars. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 03:33, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. I think it's a funny article that goes well with mine. I don't get why you think that "personal story arcs" are so evil, in this case I believe that continuity between some of the articles improves them overall.The preceding unsigned comment was added by SamTheAwesome (talk • contribs)
    I can't speak for Spike, but I think continuity is ok as long as the articles are high quality. I also think your article is somewhat funny, for whatever it's worth (which probably isn't a whole lot) and better than Dolphin uprising. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:13, 30 Aug 2014
    Anything is OK as long as an article is of sufficiently high quality. The problem with story arcs is this: Humor is the highest value for an Uncyclopedian considering new edits to an article; and declining to apply an edit because SamTheAwesome wants Dolphin uprising to make sense when read alongside The Great Whale Invasion is a gigantic non-issue with which to burden any Uncyclopedian. Spıke ¬ 00:46 30-Aug-14
Comments
  • New Uncyclopedian SamTheAwesome has addressed this. I am inclined to vote against any made-up war, and warned Sam against turning this into a personal story arc with his new The Great Whale Invasion (which I'd also vote to delete), but will hold off to see if he takes either anywhere funny. Spıke ¬ 13:08 21-Aug-14

edit United Socialist States of America H T D Survivor

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 286 hours
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Another article whose title demands that the reader type the exact joke he wants to read, to see if we ever wrote it. Recasting the USA as a socialist/Soviet country is trite to begin with, and in part simply true. What this article provides is an extremist version of what Obama wants to do with America. Neither the parts that are too close to truth nor the parts that are paranoid are funny. Spıke ¬ 22:21 21-Aug-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Not horrible but too far from the truth to be funny, IMHO. Just kind of dull, really. Snarglefoop (talk) 23:29, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
  3. ConCass2 made it a bit better, but it's still not great. Sorry. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 02:47, August 29, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote Keep. It may not be good, but it isn't bad enough for VFD. Speaking of which, was this article nominated a while back? The title seems familiar. ConCass2 (talk) 23:43, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
    One person (using three usernames) has repeatedly hacked at this article, seemingly based on real-world issues, then tried to nominate it here. This seems to be the first correctly-formatted VFD of it since 2007. (Click on Survivor in the section heading.) Spıke ¬ 12:14 25-Aug-14
  2. Symbol keep vote Keep. TheWikiMan026 MUN,UmP,POOP (Chatter) Norn Iron Flag 18:56, August 25, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Symbol comment vote Comment. [1], this Wikipedia page seems to suggest that the USSA was not an invention of Uncyclopedia and therefore may be typed into our searchbar. I'll have a look at it and see what to touch up. Obama being a socialist is only a joke that Americans will get as Britain's current (already quite dismantled) welfare state (and many other countries') makes Obama's policies seem rather Conservative. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:27, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I had a go but realized that it was far too factual (based on the USSA in Back in the USSA) and lacked humour. I would be happy to vote against if no one is willing to re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign Scotland Flag 1 Compassrose VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:17, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
    Then I was mistaken that it was an article about nothing. Still, it is not humor but allegory. Spıke ¬ 13:12 22-Aug-14
  • I rewrite the intro, and replaced all the political wannabe-satire with genuine humour, the type that you'd expect on Uncyclopedia. Also, the rest of the article has a lot of appalling grammar errors. ConCass2 (talk) 21:48, August 25, 2014 (UTC)

edit Brian Cowen H D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 215 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Nothing but insult after insult after insult. Nothing to be salvaged. Hell, the opening quote is "Fat cunt" - Oscar Wilde. ConCass2 (talk) 20:57, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. The Intro and the quotations (the "Fat cunt" one is the only significant change since Dwight K Shrute finished this in 2010) give the impression that the point of the article is the joy of taking savage hacks at the former Irish leader, rather than taking some time to try to be inventive. Spıke ¬ 21:45 24-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote Delete. Maybe there is some worthy humor that I can't understand, not being Irish. But the intro alone doesn't make me want to search for it. Anton (talk) Uncyclopedia United 22:58, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Ych a fi. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 00:51, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Symbol comment vote Comment.Feel it should stay in some format but current version is largely abuse. --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:12, August 29, 2014 (UTC)

  • It has its funny moments even though it's mostly all abuse (although what article on a politician isn't?). I'm not going to vote to save it though. Capt. Gull (talk) 02:10, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
    True. I think the article is just a cleaned up version of this one.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:15, August 31, 2014 (UTC)

edit Mudripper H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 105 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. "A mudripper is bout a strange creature born in the small community of Taylor." Then lists and Sandbox cruft. Not notable and not funny. Spıke ¬ 10:56 29-Aug-14
  2. Does not jump the bar. -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 01:59, 30 Aug 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Slackware H T D

Score: 4
Elapsed Time: 68 hours
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Might be funny to someone who understands the topic, but somehow I doubt it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:47, August 30, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Ugh! UNIX described in the form of biblical commandments. That, before the listcruft begins. Spıke ¬ 23:55 30-Aug-14
  3. Symbol delete vote He invented what we call today, "water" -– Llwy-ar-lawr (Shyriiwook?) 17:31, 31 Aug 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote Delete. Sub-biblical opening kills the interest very early on.--LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:42, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit My ingenious plan to attack Obama with non-lethal weapons H T D

Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 24 hours
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote Delete. Created during the week John McCain stated that it wouldn't be the end of the world if Obama were elected. Not exactly Assassination Humor, but has the same problems and is fatally unclever. Spıke ¬ 20:42 1-Sep-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

edit Stanley Random Chess H T D

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 6 hours
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote Stanley Random Article. The humor strategy is randomness and its basis is totally dependent on a concept developed at some other website. And no, the Wikipedia link is not to the corresponding page but to a list of hoaxes. Spıke ¬ 14:38 2-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote Delete. Random is the operative word with this. If it hadn't been so long, I would have let it go..but it isn't is it? --LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:40, September 2, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
Personal tools
projects