Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
Abusers of the policy will be abused themselves. You have been warned.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
Place {{vfd}} at the top of the page you would like to add to VFD. Unmarked articles will be removed from VFD without prejudice.
Create a new section for your nominated article.
New entries on top.
Every article must be given a section of its own; if you are putting 10 related articles up, every single one should be given a section of its own.
The section should be titled the same as the article and linked to it, as ==[[Name of Article to be Deleted]]==.
Edit the Pages for Deletion section below and carefully follow the (currently hidden) instructions you see there. If you screw it up, you will probably get banned.
Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
Thank you.
No, really, thank you very much.
Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a *
* - Creates a bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the *).
Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
--~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
If you are not an administrator or the designated {{poopsmith}}, do not remove anything from VFD, doing so will get you banned for a very long time.
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
One of the many reasons I think it should have been Forest Fire Month - VFD cleanup of literal alien crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Random and unfunny. Lesse here... tap the C-stick... there we go. Smash it out of the arena. (Hammer optional.) User:Hinoa4/sig1M 04:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Keep, generally has redeeming value. and split off "How to defeat a chav" into its own page to be extended. I would say "The argument" has NRV though. I'd add a mention of Queen Angela, her recent resignation, &c. &c to the first paragraph, and make it more sensible. --Quentin Smith 21:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
This thing is ugly, stupid, and just can't be saved. --emc! ╬ 23:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I still don't get emo references (nor do I get emo in general. Goth-punk?), but VFD is for awful and this is not it. Modusoperandi 03:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I found certain parts slightly amusing. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 05:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
How this ever survived for so long is baffling; kill it please. --emc! ╬ 03:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
It looks like a homophobic article, with homo changed to emo. Terrible --Bilky AskoTalk Here 14:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
So it's an emophobic article? That could be good, but too short, ugly and crap to be kept. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
There's not even a joke in here; it's just slander. Besides, only two real articles link to it. It's cute, but I'm sorry to say that it was made by a person when they were beginning and it's quite frankly very low quality. If the Lance Armstrong article got nominated for VFD, then this article is long past due for it's VFD. --emc! ╬ 04:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, since you appear to know things about stuff and whatnot (whereas I am the opposite of that), I'll sit this one out. Modusoperandi 04:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Under "miracles" it's got, "He once made a penny appear out of little Jimmy's hair." That's friggin' genius. Modusoperandi 00:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
KILL. Has no reason to live. -- Sir CHolla | CUN 22:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete for the obvious reason that it sucks. --emc! ╬ 03:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Wait! They spelled squirrel wrong. Dipshits. F*ck 'em. That "He once made a penny appear out of little Jimmy's hair." is still genius, though. I might have to steal it and start a page that doesn't suck. Modusoperandi 04:23, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
We already have plenty of World War II articles of much higher quality. While the Wii pun has potential, this exercise in horrible writing has no right to exist. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Holy bad grammar/spelling and whatnot! Even if it was cleaned up it would still be inferior to World War II. Modusoperandi 19:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Merge the WW1 pun into World War I and Delete. Alksub 20:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I almost voted to keep until I realized I was actually reading the World War II article that King in Yellow had linked to. Then I read the actual WWII article. KILL IT. --George VI 06:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Would it be worth merging to a World War II-related page ? MadMax 19:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Dalek, Modus, Alky, and everyone else. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Mostly rips off Wii and the rest is terrible humour. Bilky AskoTalk Here 14:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Nonsensical movie articles are funny. KeepAlksub 20:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
I just don't get this. Anyone? Anyone? Beuller? Yeah, Delete. User:TD 22:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Too... many... red... links... making... eyes... burn... (and if anyone mentions my sig, they are dead). ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I cannot see any worthwhile humour Bilky AskoTalk Here 14:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Not a gut-buster, mind you, but I can appreciate the anti-trekness, as a ST fan myself. There is a subtle humor here, making fun of how technobabble was often used to save the day in ST:TNG. 'Sides, I've seen smellier piles of literary feces. Though I'm usually extremist with deletions, I do have some heart. Consider my vote the token resistance to a lost cause. User:TD 22:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Weak Keep This has potential. For those of you who don't know the reference, that Nexus thingy was a utopian phenomenon. Also, maybe try adding some kind of diffuse cloud and a reference to the time Picard spoke to God. ...Yeah. Alksub 20:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Not very funny. --George VI 04:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
E-R-A-S-E. Just too tiny and boring, like a ball bearing Bilky AskoTalk Here 15:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
R-E-M-O-V-E from existance. --Sbluen 01:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Hello, I rewrote it just for fun. What do you think now?--Shandon 17:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC) Please note the date folks; this is the most recent thing done to this article.
I should think the nom has achieved its purpose, and if it is VFD'd again I will vote to keep. --George VI 20:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi all, what do you think about removing the VFD and Rewritten templates at this time?--Shandon 21:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
