*{{Delete}} that was a real game? --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 03:17, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
*{{Delete}} that was a real game? --{{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 03:17, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Game Swine Flu.--{{User:Romartus/sig}} 11:18, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Game Swine Flu.--{{User:Romartus/sig}} 11:18, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
+
*'''Delete'''. And no more image-macroing as a substitute for deletion! That one really wouldn't make sense to anyone who's played Disgaea. {{User:Hyperbole/sig}} 16:47, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Do not put anything up for VFD that is not appropriate for VFD.
Abusers of the policy will be abused by the claw end of a hammer. You have been warned.
If you have an article that meets the criteria for VFD:
Check the revision history of the page. It may have been vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. If so, find a better version and revert the article. It may not be suitable for deletion.
Add {{vfd}} to the article in question. Failure to do so will invalidate the vote.
Provide an initial vote (see below) and include a comment as to why you have placed the article on VFD.
If you are here to vote on the deletion/salvation of articles:
Thank you.
No really, thank you.
Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), add your sig/comment preceded with a #
# - Creates a numbered bullet for your entry and makes sure that things are formatted correctly (do not put a space before the #).
Comment - If you care to, leave a comment, even if it is as short as "The article is not at all funny". Votes without comments are less useful in analyzing the quality of an article.
--~~~~ - Sign and timestamp your vote. Unsigned votes will be removed without prejudice.
Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.
To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.
Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.
If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions.This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty.Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept.You have been warned.
Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.
Delete. Don't think I have ever seen her anything but this has to be a crapfest of piled high stupidity. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:30, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This article is about Chuck Norris, Oscar Wilde, dildos, clitorises, Mr. T, and S&M. What it is not about, is Kirsten Dunst. pillow talk 01:54, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
On a related note: "This meant that Dunst got to keep Paris as a sex slave. Due to her inability to do it, she keeps Paris chained up by a sex collar in her basement with a pineapple shoved up her ass and forces her to masturbate herself to her own sex video, using a jackhammer with a fire extinguisher attached to the end." --Mn-z 03:02, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. If I told you that I enjoy masturbating, would you laugh? If the answer is "no," then there's no humor in this article. pillow talk 01:47, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Another article from the Randumbo template. If the writer had at least stuck to 24 then I may have abstained...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:33, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Would this be a good candidate for a Alessandra Ambrosio type macro? --Mn-z 03:05, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Not fully relevant to topic but consistent in tone enough to be more than random. I snickered a little at the pictures too. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:53, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Probably never a VFH contender , it is at least coherent and the writer shows he/she is no moron either. I did find the photo comparisons funny - so a keep in my book. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:09, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Yggdra was running away from home because her father a noob King already been attacked and fucked up by Micheal Jackson. Micheal Jackson then destroy all the town, and established new kigdom, called Gayquian Kingdom. --Mn-z 03:13, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I disagree with pelargorium. I say "hell no".--Count of Monkey Crisco 08:48, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. I think I feel just sad despair at the level of literacy with a contribution like this. Another wannabe game writer , is this a crap CV disguised as an article ?. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:15, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
. Are young readers now learning to read and write via games like this ? Perhaps it is the END OF CIVILIZATION as we know it ! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:13, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. And no more image-macroing as a substitute for deletion! That one really wouldn't make sense to anyone who's played Disgaea. pillow talk 16:47, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to Baby farming Of the five or so articles we have on eating babies (and how many do we honestly need?), this is the most in-your-face unfunny. It's like someone took Beginner's_Guide/Obvious and did exactly the opposite of what is says on purpose. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 04:05, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This is not Swift's "A Modest Proposal." WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 08:22, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Syndrome, no better way to earn Delete votes than to point us to an alternative article that gets the job done. Spıke¬ 16:40 20-Nov-09
Delete It's over. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:36, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
About that, SPIKE: Sometimes we'll have several articles on one subject if it's something popular or if the articles have radically different concepts. (See our multiple articles on George Bush or Jesus). This phenomenon, however, does not apply to eating babies. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 18:43, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Yup, I asked and was taught this in the Forum. Whether or not multiple articles would be acceptable, your argument-by-comparison was still effective. Spıke¬ 19:59 20-Nov-09
Comment. I neither love it, nor hate it but it did have one remarkable sentence in the mediocrity: "The subject of eating babies is covered in Jonathan Swift's classical satire "A Modest Proposal" written in the late 1700's. Unfortunately, satire was invented around the late 1800's, so his story drove the Irish to actual baby cannibalism." --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:54, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
Surely it could survive as a footnote of Baby farming. Spıke¬ 14:40 21-Nov-09
Maybe a merge tag is in order? (with a construction or fix tag so this doesn't fall through the deletion cracks if we forget about it.). --Mn-z 03:22, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Written it seems by someone with the handle User:JeNeSaisPas . Actually it isn't that bad though the language and redundant homophobic rant aren't a help. Basic idea is David Cameron and Nick Clegg are the same person is a valid joke. Perhaps just needs a tidy up and tone down. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:22, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Irony, hypocrisy, and shifting positions are endemic to politics; whatever you think of Clegg, there is no reason to make a hatchet-job this numb. Wikipedia does not assert that he is gay in the first place (well, they wouldn't) but does note that he figures into the year's expense-account scandals, a real source of ridicule that the article misses. As earlier this week, best way to get a good article is to huff this one. Spıke¬ 02:29 20-Nov-09
*Keep. Normally I'm all for placing articles like this in a shredder but..seems like someone is working hard . I know it is completely unfunny so perhaps the writer could receive a quiet word from someone and stick it on their user page ? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:28, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete An IP has been chiseling away unfunny sections of this article. If he keeps it up, it's just going to be a blank page. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:49, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Another unfunny description of a fictional country, with fictional neighbors, as if to set up yet another video-game Armageddon. Except for the bit about Stalin and the USSR. Spıke¬ 00:40 20-Nov-09
Delete. Absolutely no hint of humor here. pillow talk 21:50, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. There's a difference between working hard and actually accomplishing something. No matter how much effort they put into this masturbatory wreck it's just going to be a more detailed masturbatory wreck. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:43, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
Delete What a lot of cock. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:25, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Changed vote in light of Hyperbole's investigations. I looked at the others...you were right. Serially unfunny at any level and the mention of Craplogger...yes...delete..delete...delete...!--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:25, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Crap keep but a keep all the same. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:35, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. An irredeemable shitfest of poop. pillow talk 19:54, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Am waiting for someone to tell us if there is a musical group by this name; that is, that this article has any basis, and that its inscrutability is an encoded reference to real facts. Spıke¬ 22:48 19-Nov-09
So would you vote keep for real bandcruft and delete for fake bandcruft? Or the other way around? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Mostly want to defer voting while I don't know what I don't know, which was a lot in the case of Suryavarman II. Yes, it would be more keep-able if it were clearly bandcruft. Spıke¬ 23:26 19-Nov-09
Comment. I would like to see an article on Marital Arts that combines marriage and fighting. Actually, that's kind of depressing. I'm off to sulk now. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 23:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Clever. Even the list is clever. Occasionally random, but fun for music-lovers. Spıke¬ 21:14 19-Nov-09
Keep. If this goes , we will ever see an article like this again ? Remove the duff bits (Stalin zzzz etc) - and it can remain servicable. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:37, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. A bizarre article. Kind of coherent, but in no way funny. pillow talk 19:52, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
The instrument is "played by ear"--literally. Plays A through G, plus the "secret" note H. Engineering diagrams for this food-filled instrument were discovered as "papers wrapped in an oily rag." Gems throughout. But no role for the University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople. Spıke¬ 02:49 20-Nov-09
Keepish Stupid but I smirked a bit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:54, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Honestly, is anyone surprised that this sucks? pillow talk 19:46, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Cheap shot at local eatery; see below. Spıke¬ 22:33 19-Nov-09
Delete. An idea with possibility but not like this. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:39, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Coherent article with few feints into randomness. But asserting that a local eatery is Mafia-related and flouts the health code, and taking other cheap shots, isn't clever but generic. Looks like a place with franchises in only a few towns: Codeine's mum? Spıke¬ 21:26 19-Nov-09
I assumed it was just an article about "What would it be like if the Nintendo mascot, Mario, opened an Italian restaurant?" pillow talk 21:35, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
That would be an interesting direction in which to take it; but I don't see where the author did so. Spıke¬ 22:03 19-Nov-09
Yeah, looks like there was a throwaway reference or two at the beginning but the author took it no further. This article is just plain confused about what it wants to be. pillow talk 22:20, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Remarkable. There is a concept; and the subsequent randomness was written by a scholar and not a twerp between games on his Nintendo. If this should acquire an actual purpose, it would be great. Spıke¬ 21:40 19-Nov-09
Delete
Delete. Tagged rewrite, but not worth rewriting. pillow talk 19:45, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Weak Delete It's certainly... thorough. There's just a lot of concept problems. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:02, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Delete looks a play on the word "Mariology", i.e. the study of Mary, replacing various proper names with the Nintendo characters. --Mn-z 03:31, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Last half of final paragraph (in non-matching Yo Momma style) was anonIP vandalism Oct-Nov'08; now deleted; likewise the See Also to unrelated "Dexter :D". Spıke¬ 22:32 19-Nov-09
I've added an animation from the gallery and will break it into sections and improve typography if it is Kept. Spıke¬ 02:40 20-Nov-09 What is the "concept problems," guys? It imagines the usual ecclesiastical number-of-angels-that-can-dance-on-the-head-of-a-pin-ology, applied to the popular character of primitive video games, and does so with skill. Spıke¬ 03:01 21-Nov-09
I think that is the problem. The title gets a slight chuckle, but other than that, it reads like a wikipedia (or even Britannica) article with proper name replacement. --Mn-z 03:31, November 22, 2009 (UTC)
The divinity of Luigi? The "plumberness" of Mario? This article is totally dead-pan--but not unfunny! Spıke¬ 15:42 22-Nov-09
PS--Version in my userspace now has section heads and somewhat tighter wording. Spıke¬ 16:11 22-Nov-09
Delete.In 1944, Leeroy Jenkins declared that there was only one man bad-ass enough to destroy Hitler, who somehow was alive again. Rommel helped war effort while Robert E Lee took his place at Halo. It just goes on like that. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:22, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
Shitty dime-a-dozen article about nothing. pillow talk 19:26, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Have the people citing our Delete rationales as their Keep rationales perhaps seen the movie Peyton Place, where the stereotypical New Englander votes against the majority on everything, including against adjournment when all the business is done? Are you voting just to be contrarian, or do you really see promise in this article? Do you realize that the italicized phrase above just goes on and on? Spıke¬ 04:26 19-Nov-09
That's still referring to the movie, not here. Do you really see promise in this article? Spıke¬ 06:03 19-Nov-09
I believe that what Colin and Syndrome are implying is that this article passes the "So bad it's good" test, in the vein of Mr winkler is GAY. That they consider it a special kind of incoherence where the author fails so badly that the author himself becomes the joke. pillow talk 19:23, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
So glad you cited the winkler article before I stumbled on it and nominated it. Spıke¬ 21:05 19-Nov-09
It's been nominated three times, and survived all three. Today, it's one of the most popular articles on Uncyclopedia - and a personal favorite of mine. I wrote the spinoff article A gay retared place. pillow talk 21:10, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, that's what I meant. I wrote Heinrich himmler is GAY to add to the Winkler madness, although I don't expect this particular article will generate any spinoffs. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 22:29, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
All right, those are deliberately bad. This one is just bad. And, by the way, profoundly incomplete, and mostly ignored since Aug-07. Spıke¬ 15:47 22-Nov-09
Keep This article has a good idea and concept, but isn't finished. MrNFork you! 17:27, Nov 16
Keep. It doesn't look promising and absolutely no one else except the author will know where this is going . Suggest it is checked again soon before letting it defrost. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:53, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Definitive useless article. Maybe, just maybe could be merged with Crystal meth. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:36, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It's only a month old, but the author spent 8 days on Uncyclopedia and is probably unlikely to ever come back. I'm not encouraged about the future of this article. pillow talk 18:38, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. You know what guys... I may have been... MrNFork you! 20:32, Nov 19
Comments
The problem with drug-induced editing is that a random thought over which you laugh for 10 minutes convinces you it was funny. CoMC has a good idea of using part of this article to flesh out the other one, as you used to be able to take two Chevy Vegas and make one working one. Spıke¬ 14:25 16-Nov-09
Delete I checked to see if we had an article about The Coors that I could link to in my comment above and found this crappy article. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 01:54, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Bottom line is: it's not funny. Let's decide how to make this funny after this unfunny heap of slag is gone. pillow talk 20:19, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Like Obi-Wan Kenobi, its most promising life requires that this incarnation die. Spıke¬ 01:13 17-Nov-09
Delete. Unfinished, uncared for , unillustrated and ditchwater dull to boot. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:29, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
{AAP} (Needs-photos tag) was copied into this article instead of used as a tag; Section 1 was usage guide for the tag; fixed. Spıke¬ 02:06 13-Nov-09
And {VFD} added--I'm sure this is above my pay grade. Spıke¬ 02:12 13-Nov-09
Good concept (confuse Adolph Coors the brewer with Adolf Hitler), bad execution descending into babble. A fix would not be trivial. Spıke¬ 02:10 13-Nov-09 post-edited