Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 19: Line 19:
A bit "wacky" at the moment, but if there's a good rewrite to be had, let's see it. -- [[User:Codeine|Codeine]] <small>[[Order_of_Uncyclopedia#Officer_.28OUN_or_OUN.29|OUN]]</small> <small>[[template:Burninator|Bur.]]</small> 13:03, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Not great, and has also been vandalised a couple of times (blanking and vanity). Kill it? -- [[User:Codeine|Codeine]] <small>[[Order_of_Uncyclopedia#Officer_.28OUN_or_OUN.29|OUN]]</small> <small>[[template:Burninator|Bur.]]</small> 11:16, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Not great, and has also been vandalised a couple of times (blanking and vanity). Kill it? -- [[User:Codeine|Codeine]] <small>[[Order_of_Uncyclopedia#Officer_.28OUN_or_OUN.29|OUN]]</small> <small>[[template:Burninator|Bur.]]</small> 11:16, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:03, September 5, 2005

Important Points to note.

  • Please remember to sign your votes and edits! (use --~~~~ or the "Sign" button Button sig) Signed votes are more credible.
    • Multiple votes on the same entry from one person (that is, one using puppet accounts) is considered agenda-pushing and is frowned upon. You will be sent to the Gulags for any ergrious breech of this policy.
    • MAKE SURE YOUR VOTES ARE CLEAR. Please put your vote in bold text. Make all the witty comments you want, just make sure your vote is VISIBLE and EXPLICIT.
      • For example: 'Fucking Delete this piece of dogshit article! It sucks! '--slack 06:27, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)

(maybe not that explicit)

  • For pages that are created as a form of vandalism, or that are plagiarized, use QuickVFD.
  • For archived discussions, see the Archived VFD Discussions.
  • If you edit VFD disruptively, you will be banned without warning. That sort of behaviour is annoying and unnecessary.
  • Each section header on this page normally contains a link to the item being voted upon; please use [[:Image: and [[:Category: ...]] instead of simply [[Image: or [[Category: ...]] when linking to non-text.
  • SysOps, please check the page history before deleting if you see something like it suspiciously changed titles. And please archive old entries when they start to clutter up the page; also, create a new archive page when the one in use gets ridiculously big.
  • Latest candidate goes on top:


A bit "wacky" at the moment, but if there's a good rewrite to be had, let's see it. -- Codeine OUN Bur. 13:03, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Not great, and has also been vandalised a couple of times (blanking and vanity). Kill it? -- Codeine OUN Bur. 11:16, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Moving from QVFD, in the off chance that a mathematician can confirm or deny that this is funny to mathematicians.


Bukkake Brigade seems to be the new ZFGC. The links should probably point to User: namespace to prevent random vanity like this, I think. --Splaka 07:52, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

If users with the same name exist then Be Italic--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 08:04, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Only one of them exists so far (I checked the contributions on all the nicks, happy? MM says I ain't lazy enough, bah!). Relinkifiying. But that wasn't really the point of this vfd. Heh. --Splaka 08:22, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC) (italic)

Captain Beefheart

This appears to be a genuine bio, albeit not very well written. Suggest huffing or it shall remain an appendix. --Rollo75 06:50, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC) This cries REWRITE! --MonkeyGem 07:12, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete Uncyclopedia is not a jokebook and this rubbish has no room on here. Wilde must be rolling around in his grave even more then he usually is. -- 07:22, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC) Delete This is QVFD material. What is there to discuss? And why isn't there a Captain Bee Fart article? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 09:59, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Captain Beefheart was a musician, and this bio is crap and unfunny. Remove the heart and let it die. AmyNelson 13:57, 5 Sep 2005 (BST)

Image:Jesus card2.jpg

  • DELETE: If other people can vote to highlight this image, then I can vote to delete it.

It just isn't funny, sorry. Kevin Smith isn't funny either BTW There may be few of you that agree with me and that's certainly ok with me, but I've got to speak my peace. --Pam Johnsenson 00:46, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I absolutely agree that Kevin Smith isn't funny (wait, did you mean the actor/director or the Uncyc page? Doesn't matter, they're both lame), but I see no particular reason to delete this image if other people, evidenced by VFP, like it. --Rcmurphy KUN 01:18, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

  • of course, if Kevin Smith is lame, then why isn't an image ripped from a Kevin Smith movie lame? I'd be interested in knowing how many images have been uploaded to uncyclopedia are swiped "buddy christ" images. --Pam Johnsenson 01:51, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I do think it's lame. And overused. But I'm not the only person here. A lot of people like Kevin Smith's tripe films so I'm willing to vote to keep an image that a lot of people may find amusing. Look, I don't think some of the nominated articles are funny either, but I probably won't VFD them because even if I don't like them, I know some people do. It's the good of the whole over the good of the individual: that's what we're all about here. Either that or amputee jokes, I can't remember which. --Rcmurphy KUN 06:58, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep -- ERTW MUN 01:28, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep We are non-discriminatory insulters here, we will insult anyone and everyone (preferably in the same article).--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 08:07, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep Jesus loves us and wants us to laugh at him. AmyNelson 14:00, 5 Sep 2005 (BST)

Y2K Bug

I would've put this on qvfd, with all of its unfunny attempts at nonsense, but I decided to huff it here instead. --Cheeseboi 13:49, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Definition 1 is just the opposite of truth. Def 2 is factual. Overall doesn't qualify for either Things that are funny because they are false or Things that are funny because they are true. --Unissakävelijä 11:41, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Boring Delete or maybe transwiki to BJAODN just to realy fuck with their minds :-)--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 19:09, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Holy Roman Empire

Lacks coherence + No humour + Random bullshit = Axe. --Unissakävelijä 11:33, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete. While I normally agree with Elvis, this one scares me too much. At least a rewrite is in order. But preferably a delete, so I can sleep at night once more. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 19:53, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Collegium V

Dormitory V.A.I.N.ity? I've given them a friendly warning, but they seem to be updating without heeding or even wanting to discuss it. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 09:42, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It is a satellite article of University of Texas at Dallas. It seems mostly a collection of inside jokes. However, if uncyclopedia ever becomes complete, every school will have an entry full of such a collection. It is arguable whether this is desirable. (Workin on that laziness boss!) ~Spl
UtarEmpire has set the standard on college-related articles with his series under the category of Wheeling Jesuit University. This article doesn't even come close. Which is why we shouldn't just delete it. We should delete the hell out of it'. And possibly vandalize it first. ~MM

Hmm, I keep missing when there is a discussion on pages. Anyway, this article is decidedly unfunny pretty much. Both it and University of Texas at Dallas need serious scrapping and recreation. Perhaps some of you should state if any parts at all are funny, tell us why the rest aren't, and then let us rework the UTD page to fit with uncyclopedia. --Xerika 18:21, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The funny part is the "Have you seen this Cat" poster on the U-Dallas page. Although it's not that funny, and it's hard to tell if it's original. Other than that, they stink of vanity, and I vote both for speedy chopping. For it to be funny, it has to make someone like me laugh who's never been to and knows nothing about the school. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 18:54, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Andrew Tritz

Ok, this doesn't seem to be about anyone famous (37 google results), and I swear I can't tell if this is slander or vanity. Hence the invented word Slandanity. I am not sure, but I suspect John Kleeb, Carrie Whitcomb and Tamara of Greensboro might be related (or at least two). Also, I have this rash I can't get rid of... --Splaka CUN Bur. SG CM © 08:55, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Update, VFD tag removed *pout*. ~S
I've had a word on their talk.

Delete. Vanity, and therefore it must die. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 19:38, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep. At least half of it is true, so it can't be considered slander. -- 23:54, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I think it's all funny. -- 20:07, 4 Sep 2005 (EST)

All these numbers, I think they're trying to communicate with us! Wait, they could be dangerous... anybody remember subtraction from grade school? --Spintherism 06:44, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

various Proofs

There are some reduntant pages for proofs repeating the text from the main proof article (most one-two lines). (for example, Proof by Obfuscation) -Yonir

Would you mind actually listing the articles in question? I think you give us too much credit by thinking we are not lazy and would actually actively hunt these articles down. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:00, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete, (BTW: I peeked them in his contribs myself.) --Splaka CUN Bur. SG CM © 08:12, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot. We have one un-lazy person, who would probably otherwise qualify for admin. Gotta work on that laziness, Spläka. It's holding you back. ~MM
I'll respond to that later, um maybe. (how's that?) --Splaka CUN Bur. SG CM © 09:00, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

To each his own strategy. I work by filling comment areas with swathes of writing, yet contributing little to the core content of uncyclopedia. In fact, with all my deletions, I think I have managed to actually add negative content to uncyclopedia. Now that, my friend, is the hallmark of good management.

Regardless, I whacked all proofs that Yonir had slapped a VFD template on, and, of course, left the main article. --Famine 15:25, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep -- 00:03, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Gay rights

Irredemable. Most of this anon author's contributions happen to be pretty homophobic tripe. Matthew Shepard was saved by Carlb, and I'm in the process of saving Liberal Christianity, though that one is also risking deletion. Nonetheless, this article is beyond saving. DELETE. --OneTopJob6 00:49, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand. Which words that sound like "Gay rights" are you objecting to? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:57, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I don't know... It intends to make all intolerant dudes accept the goodness of a psychosexual disorder that leads to acts causing AIDS and various forms of cancer, because if they do not they shall receive ten months of sensitivity training in the bowels of Heck. Gay rights activists have been successful at such endeavours as making pederastry an alternative lifestyle, and bringing STD's to the public. Sarcastic in the vein of Evil Atheist Conspiracy and Gay agenda, or genuine hate-rambling in the vein of all the shit you see all over the net? You be the judge. But read the article first. --OneTopJob6 01:28, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
But which words are homophobes, i.e., words that sound alike but mean something different? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:04, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I say redirect to Gay Rites and write that article. --Spintherism 04:49, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Now that is inspired, Do what spin says--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 11:22, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

But doesn't all this discussion of gay rights marginalise left-handed gay people, already a one-in-ten minority within a one-in-ten minority? As for gay rites, these folks seem to be in that field of endeavour. --Carlb 16:53, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewritten. Since some fools voted me for WOTM, I figured I should make a token effort to actually write something. It is now completely different, and at least salvagable. It still needs a ton of work, but I hope I have provided enough muse that someone else can run with this. I wash my hands of it. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 20:38, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Vote for deletion

Keep - submitting here was a mere formality. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:46, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite/Expand/Vandalize - I fixed it up a bit but it is still more of a sucky undic entry. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 00:52, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep, but obviously leave the template. --Spintherism 04:44, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Redirect We already have one - Uncyclopedia:Vote this page for deletion. --Famine 17:44, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Red Vs Blue

Factual and not funny. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:24, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite/Delete Red V Blue could be better, in the vein of Pot V Kettle. --Nytrospawn 13:47, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Please throw this into the skid. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:17, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Jason Mewes

With the cost of funny skyrocketing to over $3.00/gallon at the pump in some areas, is it any wonder that this article is out of gas? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:13, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Yawn. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 07:17, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete/rewrite I don't know if this site is well known enough to make a rewrite worthwhile; if it isn't then just huff it. --Cap'n Ben CUN 08:07, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Totally up to you guys. Wasn't that funny, but almost could be, if it was a mother in depth look at linguistic differences or somesuch. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:46, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep Better than your ghey LOLOLOLO--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:01, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I wroted the current version to replace the original (Homo: You) entry, which filled me with unreasonable childish anger. It's mostly a poke at the foo' that wrote the first one. I vote to delete it. ----OEJ

I say keep but maybe stick a rewrite template on there so anybody with teh mUzorZ won't be inhibited. --Spintherism 05:05, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep/rewrite It's not great, but it could be much, much worse. --Cap'n Ben CUN 08:05, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Aw, the cockles of my heart is all warmed up now. I will wre-write ASAP and try for actual dysinformative humor. Homor? ----OEJ 17:14, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
OK, a rewrite started. It's up for grabs. Somebody else do something on it, please. The MuZorZ do be departed from me. -- 20:00, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Looks redeemed. --OneTopJob6 00:58, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Hooray! Now is good, much. --Cap'n Ben CUN 13:25, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Not a candidate for undictionarying as it was previously marked, it's a candidate for being hurt - badly. --User:IMBJR/sig 22:08, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Pave over I know a good contractor with lots of connections in the cement business. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:48, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Wound: I take MTU to stand for "delete within a week if unfixed or unmoved" (since that is what it says, but why do users never move their dics themselves). It is a worthy topic, and should have a good article. This is not it. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 23:11, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Send it back to New Jersey in a coffin AmyNelson 18:44, 2 Sep 2005 (BST)

Category:Texas Cities

Looks like the doings of one Brephophagia (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) who has added 73 towns from Paris, France to Vancouver, BC to this category. Revert this mess and delete category? --Carlb 21:50, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Stop this madness I was looking over this guy's edits and I couldn't help wondering... "Why?" -- Codeine 21:58, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

This would be great material if Uncyclopedia was a guide for citizens of New Orleans that were looking to resettle in Texas. Since Uncylopedia is really a guide for people that want to resettle in Arkansas, it should be deleted. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 23:07, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Look here, I'm a proud, lifelong Dallasite who loves his state every bit as much as his country. Arkansizing Texas in jest is no vice. We city slickers can get a decent laugh at random off-color craziness at least occasionally. Brephophagia is not doing anything really bizarre. Besides, isn't this a site for utterly pointless articles? Who cares if every city is also represented in Texas. Keep it!

annul, black out, bleep, blot out, blue-pencil, cancel, clean, clean up, cross out, cut, cut out, decontaminate, dele, delete, destroy, drop, edit, efface, eliminate, exclude, expunge, gut, knock out, launder, obliterate, omit, pass up, remove, rub, rub out, rule out, sanitize, snip, squash, squelch, sterilize, strike out, trim, wipe out --EvilZak 02:06, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Remove-itate. Also, take away Zak's thesaurus. We need an Athesaurus. A collection of words and what they should be replaced with. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 02:11, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Resounding Keep No harm, no foul. --Nytrospawn 02:16, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I second the motion to Keep --Spintherism 04:18, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I already voted, and I stand behind my vote. I'm not a flip flopper, like some. However, upon examining the broader social issues at play, and the deeper impact this article could have on promoting the (much needed) Texan sense of self-esteem that has taken such a drubbing since 2000, I think we should reopen the issue and commission a feasibility study. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 06:36, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's kind of pointless, and I don't get the joke but by the same token, I don't think it detracts from anything. Might as well just leave it. --Cap'n Ben CUN 08:03, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

put on a diet and exercise program if it must be kept: Cities has 133 articles. Texas Cities has 115 articles. If you can figure out which 18 cities are Not Texan Even If You're Insane and, more importantly, why this is so, you're a better person than I. --Hessef 08:59, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I know where to find 16 of them.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 16:28, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Comment out of curiosity: Is there an amusing pattern that distinguishes them from the "Texan" cities? --Hessef 04:15, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Only my misplaced patriotism, oh and the fact that Wigan is the only Texas city of the lot (probably a bit OTT for that one joke) --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 10:46, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Too stupid. --Awshit 21:57, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)

End of the world

Not quite funny. A couple of good lines, but comes off as an instrument of torture from a poetry open mike night. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:12, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Could to Better Rewrite--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 19:13, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Image:435px-Katrina Flood Overview.jpg

Ok, not that we care what wikipedia usually does, but Bubba Wales himself deleted the original image from the wikimedia servers citing abuse of fair use. :( --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 21:19, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Yeah, if Bubba done it, we gots to done it too --Nytrospawn 16:23, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Unless we figure out who took the picture and mercilessly mock him. But that wouldn't be nice. --Spintherism 04:20, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)


This appears to just be vanity. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 19:35, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Update: User deleted VFD tag. Was reinstated with a warning, and suggestion to move page to user namespace. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 05:05, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

'Huff or Snuff - It sucks, and not in the good way. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 03:44, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

This page allows the public to see what it means to be JS. Think how Joe Strummer would feel. (or Jerry Sienfield, Jerry Springer.. Jessica Simpsons?)

Its so obscure that in all likelyhood it isnt a vanity page. So I give it a weak keep/massive nonsensceorization --Nytrospawn 20:00, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure I see the same correlation between obscurity and non-vanity that Nytrospawn does. I'm tempted to redirect it to my (speaking of vanity) wonderful Vanity page article. --Spintherism 17:39, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
And I'm following Spin's advice, and doing just that. --Famine 17:51, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Kevin Dickson

I don't know what's going on with this. -- Codeine 14:31, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete. a {{what?}} candidate if ever I saw one. --ComaVN 14:49, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep Patent Nonsense (patent pending) --Nytrospawn 16:12, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete - Too rendickity. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 16:14, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep I completly disagree with what Nytrospawn said --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 16:14, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Project Quicksilver

Long and unfunny --User:IMBJR/sig 11:54, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Severely Dull - User:Barberella 13:52 31 Aug 2005 (BST)
Keep has promise and has had a fair amount of work put into it, I've had a quick shufty and it dosn't appear to be plagarism or slandanity.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:51, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Someone put a lot of work into it, sadly they forgot that it had to be funny too. Needs a humour injection rewrite. AmyNelson 15:45 31 Aug 2005 (BST)

  • Keep It is funny cuz it is so not funny. The other shoe never falls, there is no punch line. Admittedly, this could be a dangerous thing to allow lest a precedent is set. Qaz 07:32, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Jerry Lewis

Worthy subject, but article lacks a certain something, what the French call "Funny". --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 10:05, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Jesus who ever failed to make something funny with this to work with needs to turn in their Licence to kill Amuse Rewrite or delete--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:44, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete They were following the directions to funny, but I think they got distracted by a shiny thing and took a wrong turn.-- 13:51, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Wikitravel Logo Controversey, Wikitravel Logo Controversey, and Wikitravel Logo Controversy

Please kill all three, the redirects and the article. Incredibly lame article. You can delete the reference to the article from here as well, if you like. Thanks. --Steve Johnsenson 04:19, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Mild Delete Article needs to provide more disinformation and improve humor quotient. Mere reference to vandals/vandal groups not funny. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:28, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I thought it was going to be good in the end it turned out boring, probably TFAODP--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:42, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

"Draugystes Stadionas"

Maybe in some foreign lingo this is funny, but I don't govareet the russki.--Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I think it's lithuanian, maybe merge into one of their existing articles?--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:40, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Oh, so it is. I had done a google search on the word "Tusovshika" and got a bunch of things in cyrillic, but now that I've done the same with the other words it does appear to be Latvian. Any ideas about which article to merge it to?--Spintherism 14:50, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

"The Greatest Witticism of All Time"

The witticism itself isn't so bad, but it would need a bit more of an article to survive in the wild.--Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Needs expansion by someone who gives a shit. Or Deletion --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:33, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Expand or MTU--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:38, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I might try to add a bit to this at some point, but that point probably won't be until some time tomorrow. --Spintherism 14:59, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Added a bit. I really have no idea if it's funny though. I can never tell. --Spintherism 00:17, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Almost vaguely interesting, but apparently factual and not really funny. --Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Should be 4E75'ed --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:34, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Move to TFAODP--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:36, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

If you have a problem and no-one else can help, maybe you can huff: The A-hole team. -- Codeine 18:00, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Blatantly ripped from Discworld. Unoriginal and unfunny. --Spintherism 04:03, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

REwrite or Delete --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:36, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Only worth keeping in protective habitat as an example of why plagarism is bad Mock or Delete --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:34, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 :Keep The "See Also" section saves the article. --Unissakävelijä 10:08, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Dumb, no lolz. --Awshit 21:47, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Might have rewrite potential --ComaVN 21:54, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
It might, but it might not. Let's give it 5 - 7 days and see what happens. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 23:57, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep I laughed, and I generally don't. It's a thing of beauty. --Spintherism 04:05, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Weak Burn in Hell --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:19, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I guess some people just don't understand art. Go ahead and delete then. There are plenty of other nonsensical pages to satisfy me. --Spintherism 14:54, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

The Hobo Prince

Vanity page? His user page redirects to here. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 20:42, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete, with a slim possibility for rewrite --ComaVN 21:49, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Wait - See what happens. If it develops into something, KEEP (obviously), otherwise DELETE. If I was a betting man, I'd bet on delete. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:04, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Move to User:Thehoboprince or do a David Bravo on his arse --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:07, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Suggestion - We all hold hands and dance and see if I get off my lazy butt and finally tell the story of my mysterious origin. HINT! It has to do with pants and chicken salad. :) --The Hobo Prince
Then ye shall finish it, so say we all --Nytrospawn 16:14, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Response - FINE! I will finish it. But first I sleep. After sleep comes creativity and the non-bad spelling powers.--The Hobo Prince
Tick-toc-tick-toc-tick-toc. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:18, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Its been a week and the article hasnt been fixed up. In 24 hours (or in the next 5 minutes) I will delete this page --Nytrospawn 13:51, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)


Well, um, somewhat factual, and basicallty seems to serve no reason for existing. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 20:13, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • QVFD-worthy. --Carlb 20:14, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Squash --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:05, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
BORING Delete--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:04, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Kill kill kill Qaz 08:11, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Down with the scorpions. --Unissakävelijä 09:29, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Did the deed. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 10:07, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)


A complete spork of Wikipedia's Lutheranism with the word "Lutheran" replaced with "Zoroastrian". Some other editing has been made to it, but it's a loooong way from being funny. -- Codeine 17:44, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

delete. Yawn. --ComaVN 18:15, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Oh come on. I thought it was funny.

Keep/Rewrite If somebody wanted to rewrite it, I'm sure they could make dramatic improvements, but until then, I see no harm in keeping it around. The Humor to Length Ratio could be better, but the Sum Humor is comparable to most other articles that wouldn't be VFDed. --Spintherism 22:51, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Rewrite We need a theologian to have a go at it and make it funny, anyone know any with a sense of humour? --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:04, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Comment: Perhaps a pun would do. I can think of one pun but I'm not sure how far a "Zorro's ass" joke would go, though. There may be a far better pun to work with, though.--Hessef 01:38, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I just so happened to sign up for a comparative religion course today, and Zoroastrianism has always interested me. That don't quite make me a theologian, but I'm no writer or humorist either, so it should all balance out. I'll do me a little research perhaps and see what sorts of funny I can whip up. --Spintherism 20:50, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Chow Zhi Wan

was qvfd, maybe vfd is needed. Looks like vanity crap to me, but maybe I'm missing something extremely funny. --ComaVN 16:48, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Much better than most vanity articles, but still in the Vanity, Attack, Inside-joke, Non-notable category. I feel so clever with my acronyms. --Spintherism 22:58, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep I'm not sure it is actualy Vanity, as the article says say Chow Zhi Wan quickly = Choosen One, which I think is a reference to Kung Fu Hussle (a film)--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:00, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I thought I'd posted a reply to this earlier, but apparently not. I think I said something like: 'Yeah, elvis is right.'--Spintherism 04:23, 2 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Interesting place names

It could maybe be an interesting article, but not with those names. Not even a chuckle, nothing. --ComaVN 14:18, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Expand/Rewrite I liked the Extra Virgin Islands, but the rest were crap. I'm sure that there are plenty of interesting names based on existing articles that could be added though. --Spintherism 14:40, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Slather with mayonaisse, then delete --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 00:08, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Maybe just turn into a category or just delete --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:33, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite and Merge with Category:Strange Place Names --Unissakävelijä 09:25, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)


I just couldn't quite bring myself to off this one from QVFD, so here it is to be judged. --IMBJR (Goatse Virgin) 11:41, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

delete no redeeming qualities whatsoever. --ComaVN 12:26, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
BORING Delete--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:01, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete not funny in the least. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:38, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete No question about it. --Unissakävelijä 09:16, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Fell off the back of a lorry -- Codeine OUN Bur. 09:49, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what your answer is so long as you feel good about it math

I'm fairly conservative but I get thoroughly sick and tired of right wing ideologues that twist the facts to support their agenda. If the agenda was humor, I might feel differently, but the people I'm thinking of are a humorless bunch. My gut feeling about this article is that it was written by people of the same stripe, people whose sense of humor has died (and yet they still think they are funny). Am I totally off base here? Is this article funny, and I'm just missing the joke? Is it meant to be ironic or Swiftian? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 03:36, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Comment: this was written by User:Orion Blastar, who I believe has made a wide range of political articles that lampoon both the right wing and the left. So I don't think it's really a question of political agenda. Whether it's funny, though - that's a different question. --Rcmurphy KUN 04:47, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep I haven't always found all of Orion Blastar's political articles funny (even put one up for deletion once), but I liked this one. Whether or not an article pushes an agenda shouldn't matter. Although I'm not a fan of the "capitalistic oppressors" answer someone added. It seems to deviate a bit from the point.-- 05:15, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I think it's reasonably funny. --ComaVN 06:43, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete It's a "they disagree with me politically so they must be morons" rant. I don't get the "Liberals hate America" meme--nearly half of voters voted for Kerry and a slim majority voted for Gore. If there were that many America-haters in America, the U.S. would be in full blown civil war by now. I also checked out Orion Blaster's "New Math" article. New Math was born and deseveredly died in the 1960's. Apparently Orion likes to kick a horse that's been dead for decades as long as he can beat up a of his few straw men (phony depictions of liberals) as well. That all being said, there's quite a bit of unreasonable stuff in any field, including education, which is ripe for mocking. Accusing approximately half of your countrymen of contemplating treasonous acts isn't a good way to make fun of those ideas.--Hessef 07:15, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Are people from another country allowed to accuse half of your countrymen of contemplating treasonous acts? --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:03, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Taking things a little too serious maybe? Since when do uncyclopedia articles have to only mock current ideas? The premis of math where any answer is correct can be pretty funny I think. The political part could maybe be removed, because that is, indeed, not very funny. --ComaVN 08:20, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Taking things too seriously can be very funny. For example, Tom's Lehrer's song about New Math is filled with mock seriousness and is actually funny. Saying that a stupid thing is stupid doesn't work as well as describing the stupid thing and letting the audience figure out the absurdities themselves. --Hessef 11:30, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep We need more funny right wing ideologues here as it is even I recognise the left wing bias in a lot of the stuff here, compare Conservatory Party vs. Manual Labour Party for instance, or for that matter the number of articles on "right-wing" papers (hence my plea for The Guardian).--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 09:52, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep What Elvis say. --Spintherism 14:45, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Smite I have no issue with the content or POV. However, it sucks. I agree we could use more funny articles like this, but this is not all that amusing. Rewrite it, fast-forwarding to our intrepid business leaders from Enron and Worldcom applying these skills, and it might be a decent article. As it is, it is crap. --Famine 23:54, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Someone added the VFD tag, (presumably without knowing about here).--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:09, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's not brilliant but it's not the worst eithioer it could probably do with some TLC (and please no lame jokes about bad teeth they are just lame)--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:09, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
definit keep. --ComaVN 06:49, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Shurely shome mishtake? It's not the best article on Uncyclopedia, but it certainly ain't deletion material. -- Codeine 08:10, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

rewrite it has started to fall apart fom so many edits, it could do with been re-writen from the ground up.-- 23:51, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

rewrite - like me, it just needs a bit of touching up 13:23, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

ASCII cows

Seems to be cut/pasted from websites such as this --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 22:09, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

This question has been raised before; the originating sources are in the public domain. --Carlb 22:35, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
It may be legal, but (IMHO) it isn't really Uncyclopedia worthy. It was pasted without proper formatting, isn't very funny, and isn't easily wikiable (hard to add a cow joke for the average user). It is also quite long (80k or so). If it were edited into wikicode, split into sections, and original material added however... --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 22:52, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete I don't claim to be an expert on what the Uncyclopedia should or should not be, but a repository for mediocre email forwards just doesn't quite capture my imagination. What I believe makes the Uncyclopedia special is that nearly every article is unique in the interweb, and the information cannot be found elsewhere. (Anybody looking for those cows could find them more easily via google or even the Wikipedia) There are, of course, many exceptions, some of them forgivable, and others less so, but it will be a dark day in the VFD indeed when the Uncyclopedia is reduced to an index of banal and unoriginal internet humor. (And here's evidence of my Flip-Flopper pride, by the way.)--Spintherism 23:07, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Dunno what I said last time but we don't lack content so I see no reason to keep it.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:12, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete but two of them should be moved to You have two cows. I'll get on it. --ComaVN 06:52, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I got on it, and the cows liked it. --ComaVN 07:26, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete It doesnt really matter if its in the public domain. ASCII art, especially bad ASCII art is not funny HAHA, but funny pathetic --Nytrospawn 14:07, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Put out to pasture - Codeine OUN Bur. 09:46, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)


It’s in German. And from what I can read, it looks like offensive and vain. Maybe a Template:Qua? --KP CUN 20:15, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep babelfish.altavista.com seems to suggets that it's a satire about he German Social Democrat Party (hence notable), is also looks like a WIP if ever I saw one, being offensive is not grounds for deleteion here, idealy we need to wait for it to be more fully rounded and then looked over by a german speaking Uncyclopedian or two (although it could do with being moved to, furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 20:21, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Has racist elements, isn't very funny, could be tidied up. I vote for it to be Suspended over fire until improved AmyNelson 22:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Move it to pending closer inspection by a German speaker. -- Codeine 21:14, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Julius Veselka

Appears to be part of Politics of Lithuania but whomever wrote this forgot to make a funny. :( --Carlb 01:47, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete if it's not factual then it's worse.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 00:00, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

The end

Rgurgitation of HHGTTG. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 23:24, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite There's an attempt to make a variety of jokes but it's going to take more than a joke about the Holy Moustache to make this a good article. --Hessef 10:02, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I've made it into a last page of uncyclopedia kind of article. Seemed like a funnier kind of plagiarism to me. --ComaVN 11:03, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

btw there's already a The End article. Redirect, maybe? --ComaVN 11:06, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

There also appear to be multiple "you have reached the end of the Internet" texts, best appears to be the one in Masters of the Internet--Carlb 15:30, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Add to the template:end or something worse may grow in it's place, furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 15:53, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Piet Hein Donner

Is this a famous person, or is this just more slandanity? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:18, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

He appears to be a Dutch politician. You can look him up here if you can read Dutch. --KP CUN 07:15, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
huff P. Donner is described in a two sentence article in wikipedia. Somehow, jokes about a person consuming vast amounts of drugs, even of that person happens to be the Dutch Justice Minister, don't do anything for me. --Hessef 10:09, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Oh original, Dutch Politian smoking dope!!!, What he^^^^ said, furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 15:55, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)


I place this here in the spirit of our kinder and gentler Uncyclopedia, though normally I'd huff it on sight. It seems to be vanity or slander or slandanity of a message board related to Zelda. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:14, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Articles about GameFAQs, apart from GameFAQs, always have more shitness than ten "average" shitty articles combined. Wait, is shitness a word? Nevertheless, at least five such articles have already been locked down on CVP, so there's a pattern of shitness, or whatever the proper term is. --EvilZak 07:10, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep - Someone went to a lot of trouble to bring this more into line with the spirit of Uncyclopedia since I posted it here. Let's leave it alone and let them have their fun, since it no longer sticks out like a sore thumb. It's more like a thumb from an alternative universe, which should fit in just fine. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 08:06, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I Don't Care - But there sure is a piss-load of activity. --Jenlight 08:17, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete "NOTICE: Unless you know much of ZFGC, this wont make much sense." To me, that reads: Here's some ZFGC inside-jokes that we're going to post outside of ZFGC just because we can.--Hessef 10:02, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep We let Camp Fuck You Die survive as it wasn't hurting anyone, we could do with trying to persuade them spread their net a little wilder rather than just editing one article and it's related pages however.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 12:06, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Replace with notice Ok, I am getting annoyed (and it is hard to annoy me), I think the page should be protected and replaced with a notice, for several reasons:

  • The page is full of links pointing to uncyclopedia namespace for each user (when it should probably point to user: namespace, and only for the registered users), and those pages keep getting created and then deleted (because they are zero content vanity mostly, and themselves get vandalized).
  • The users have caused problems, in some extreme cases blanking articles and admin user pages (darwin awards for them).
  • Vanity vandalizing other articles that are linked on their page, and possibly creating pages in the User namespace for nonexistant users (I am not sure).
  • They Removed the VFD notice' Indicating their disregard for us.

I think it should be replaced with a notice similar to: "This page has been deleted, for abuse of Uncyclopedia. We realize that not everyone who has participated in this page has done so, but many users here have contributed to the direct or indirect distruption of the Uncyclopedia project, ranging from simply linking to nonexistant pages that others inadvertantly create, to wholesale blanking and ban earning. If you would like a whole wikiproject of your own, please see the wikicities homepage for information on creating your own wikiproject for free." And then after such is created we can replace the page with a shorter notice and point the users to the new wikicity. Thoughts? --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 03:57, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Ok, having just perused the wikicities creation policy it is unlikely they'd get their own wikicity (unless it was for zelda in general). So maybe a link to the list of wiki hosts would be better. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 04:11, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Unwikify the names at least. That sort of thing breeds moronic one-liner vanity pages. I personally couldn't care less if the page was deleted outright, but I won't vote for a delete because it might become a decent page. --Rcmurphy KUN 04:05, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep - Message in Rot26 follows:

--Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 07:03, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Oh, and I fully agree that vanity pages linked to this page should be deleted, as well as bans for vandalism. Long bans. A vigilant eye and an iron hand outside the page, but let the page be their playground, at least for the moment.--Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 07:07, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Weak keep - looks harmless, and as for inside-jokes, I rather like the idea of this place harbouring such jokes even if most people don't get it - different strokes for ... (ack! I can't believe I was going to type that). --User:IMBJR/sig 11:51, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I've dewikified and restored the {{vfd}} tag, but this still looks basically like one of those pages that a group of users either creates about themselves or creates as vanity-attack against those around them. --Carlb 14:40, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Sorry it caused so much trouble. --DBRalph 18:47, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Have you looked in to some of those private wiki hosts? That might be just what you need. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 19:49, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep Why delete it guys are you that paffitic (spelled wrong) don't be baby boom booms just let them keep it. (21:28, 30 Aug 2005 (→ZFGC))

  • Why? Because you forgot to make a funny? Because we really couldn't care less what computer your buddy intends to buy next? Because the entire article is of no potential interest to anyone outside the one small group? --Carlb 21:36, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Do I even need to provide a reason? --ComaVN 21:43, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

DELETE I do not appreciate the utter vanity of this page and the reputation it portrays of my site, zfgc.com. DELETE!!! ~metallica48423

Delete Vandanity. Besides, inside jokes are never funny --Nytrospawn

It's become a parody of itself. It's actually gotten funny. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 22:24, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC) (Has no one used their decoder ring to decode the message?)

WEAK Keep Ok, S'd out my previous rant, now that it is unwikified and the few problem users were caught it isn't so bad, and the only user links are to User: namespace, and as MM says, it is more in the spirit of Un. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 22:28, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

It makes monitoring and damage control that much easier if we keep. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 03:53, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)


All I have to say on this one is, WTF?--Cheeseboi 14:17, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Expand/rewrite did a quick google, found the context and meh, it's alright. furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 15:57, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Homestar Runner

Someone went to the trouble to expand this, so I didn't huff it. However, the article is crap. I doubt that anyone can write a decent Homestar Runner article without taking HR totally out of context. Homestar Runner Thompson, gonzo journalist? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 04:11, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Or maybe Jerk City Runner? --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 05:17, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
In such cases of these I would tend to go for the idea that Homestar is a real person that somehow ended up as a character character. Like Michael Jackson. --User:IMBJR/sig 10:18, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I threw a rewrite tag at it but I think somebody should probably put the page out of its misery if it doesn't show some life soon. --Hessef 07:34, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I did a total rewrite, going with the Jerk City Runner gag. And by "gag", I mean choking on penis. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 17:02, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Do whatever Marco Malo thinks best,furthermore we should destroy Max Kool--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 16:01, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Tammy Saris

Sounds like it could be factual.

Rewrite?I'm trying to work out whether obsessive stalking of pr0n stars is funny. On balance, I think it probably isn't, unless it's done well. This isn't. --Squeezeweasel 09:26, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep I laughed at the author more than I laugh at most articles. I especially liked the google world bit. --Spintherism 22:35, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep We need more pron references on Uncyclopedia. --Marcos_Malo OUN S7fc BOotS Bur. | Talk 21:01, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete But I NEED to delete it! If I don't delete it, I might explode. It happens to me sometimes... --Famine 00:58, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete In my opinion, somethingawful.com is proof that it's funnier to write sarcastic and (mostly) factual articles about porn than satire. --Hessef 07:38, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Abstain--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 13:35, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)


This is the second appearance of this (error/test?) page. I thought a good VFD tag would give the user a chance to explain their problem and ask us how to upload images (this vfd is of a test). If we just delete it, it'll probably come back. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 01:43, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)

In my opinion, it would be better to help him out with uploading images on his user talk page than on VFD. --EvilZak 06:56, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Seems to have been created for Leiden just to host an external picture (all the text is also on the Leiden page). --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 20:48, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep. As a highpoint of Dutch cuisine, an article about something as weird as hutspot could definitly have a future. ComaVN 21:40, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Ok, thank you for uploading a pic and expanding (nothing like a good VFD to get the ball rolling!). PS: I added a bogus recipe, feel free to edit or change to be more funny and not just stereotypical (at least I left out mentions of a dyke or windmill). I'll withdraw my vote for deletion but leave this section (incase others wanna rant?) --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 21:50, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Maybe you should replace the 420s with various other euphemisms. I'd say that would increase the funny by at least 8.6.--Spintherism 17:18, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Is this canineslandanity or what? --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 20:39, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Expand there should be an article about Sydney and this could have promise if any sydney'ites want a crack at it.--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 21:47, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I had a go at this but am still not happy with it. Large entries like this require multiple inputs but it's a start.--Rollo75


Maybe be funny to Swedes, maybe not. You tell me. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 10:35, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. If it was only in Swedish, we could use the new tag Flammable and I made: {{qua?}} (see it work its magic in Chechnya) - mostly meant to give pages like that a chance to splain themselves before vfd (shameful plug)) --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 10:40, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Channel Tunnel

Isn't the whole French Surrendering thing a little cliché by now? The other two sentences are crap also.--Spintherism 07:06, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Redirect to Chunnel --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 21:52, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

PSP Firmware 2.0

Delete or merge with some other PSP article.--Spintherism 05:12, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep It's theoretically funny to people into videogames. --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 10:46, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I guess if it's some sort of majorly notable update, it makes sense to keep it, but it would just seem sort of silly to have a separate page for every update of a product instead of keeping it all in a subsection of some larger article. --Spintherism 01:55, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
The joke is, if anything, about the constant need for updates/upgrades and the marketing of those updates/upgrades. ~MM --15:28, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Discordian Society

Accurate quotes from sources, even silly sources, don't seem appropriate.--Hessef 21:45, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I'd say a rewrite is in order. --Spintherism 21:52, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Purge, delete, and don't try again. The Illumninatus Trilogy is far more insane, fucked up, and disinformative than Uncyclopedia will ever be. It is a masterpiece in its own sheer insanity. Trying to add a non-factual, somewhate coherent article to Uncyclopedia based off a non-sensical, incoherent, and inconsistent book seems doomed to failure. In wikipedia, you could at least (try to) summarize the story. Here, we discourage that sort of thing. --Famine 02:04, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Good point. --Spintherism 02:18, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Do you know who my father is?

The title has promise. The article, so far, does not.--Hessef 04:22, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC) There's a few funny answers (and I added some myself). I recant my VfD vote.--Hessef 04:47, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 06:02, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep -- 7:41, 4 Sept 2005 (EST)

Pirates versus Ninjas

Direly needs to be rewritten' or else I nix it this afternoon--Flammable CUN 14:56, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

P.S. I suggest moving it to Pirates v. Ninjas for comedic potential--Flammable CUN 14:58, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Interestingly, Encyclopedia Dramatica has Pirates vs. Ninjas on their front page.
I don't care--Flammable CUN 14:19, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
The fact that ED has it makes this article even more worthy of deletion--Nytrospawn 21:10, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
That was the intended point.-- 04:04, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite Can I take a shot at rewriting it? Please please please? I am part Pirate and part Ninja. This ought to be good.--Orion Blastar 17:52, 22 Aug 2005 (CDT)
Requisition ApprovedKnock your cock off, Blastarman--Flammable CUN 03:01, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Rewrote I did my best to try to rewrite this page. More detail than before. It leaves the war between Ninjas and Pirates ongoing, and gives somewhat of a reason why. Im a page rewritting fool. I am not sure why I keep being logged out from time to time, it recored my IP, but not my name in the history. Sorry about that. --Orion Blastar 17:32, 23 Aug 2005 (CDT)
Comment Sir I applaud you. 06:33, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Comment Thank yew verry much. I live to serve and write funny stuff. Like New Math and other funny things like the Holy Market, of course others have contributed to those as well, so I cannot take full credit. Orion Blastar 22:33, 24 Aug 2005 (CDT)

The Guardian

Rewrite or burn? --User:IMBJR/sig 12:32, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
DestroyTheres like a million "The Guardian" newspapers, and they're all non-notable --Nytrospawn 20:37, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

But there's only one real "The Guardian" ;-)

Hey! I like muesli! I hate this article. It smells funny and insults breakfast food.--Flammable CUN 20:39, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite/Expand Although I don't like muesli and am certainly not a vegetarian--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 21:17, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Can some who reads The Times and votes tory (or "Local Tax Payer" post '97) please work on it, I lack the needed distance to be funny about it. --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 21:30, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I dunno, I read the Gurgle and I can plainly see why people should mock it. --User:IMBJR/sig 21:35, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
The problem is there is not much more than "Your all lefties and you can't spell" to which the usualy response is "Yer so and I know crazy isn't it you should have seen it during the '70's, Cuh!" which dosn't really have the quality of good satire.--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 23:32, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)
The Gurgle is ripe for piss take because of it's middle class bias. I hate the middle class, as might be seem from some of my articles where I will usually have a little dig at it, even though I may be working-class-cum-middle-class. No there's something about the middle class that needs mercilessly lapooning 'til their over-educated branes pop. They are neurotic fucktards that need taking down a level. --User:IMBJR/sig 19:00, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Sounds like the start of a "I'm more working class than you competion (a perenial favourite of all british middle class people, see Julie Burchill).--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 23:12, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite: The Guardian should be easy to mock. Unfortunately the only good joke on the page as it stands is the "papers read by people who think they / know they / really do run the country", which is lifted from Yes Minister. --CrunchyCapsicum 01:13, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

well do it then I've tried with my Rapier Wit parody of the history of the Sun</sarcasm> but I'm all played out --Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 08:48, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Stock Market

Was QVFDed, needs extra beefy goodness, or killing from a great height --User:IMBJR/sig 12:16, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Added a little beef. Might add a little more later. --Spintherism 19:30, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)


This is almost funny.

Stubbed, and I vote to keep. It has potential, especially in conjunction with the two new members of The Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse. --Famine 16:49, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Jumping the shark

Was QVFDed --IMBJR 17:45, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete; unfunny & we already have Jump the shark. --DWIII 21:43, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite it (and Jump the shark while we're at it, too). Both are too short. --Trevie 23:52, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Added some crap to Jump the shark. It's longer but still not that great. --~~OEJ
Comment Perhaps it could be merged to Jump the shark ? 04:36, 22 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Russian Roulette vs. Russian roulette

The two articles should either fight in a dual to the death, or they should have sex and merge. --KP CUN 09:18, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Roulette, Keep/Improve roulette. The former is plain stupid and random nonsense which might make a monkey laugh. The latter is more funny and has an actual reference to why it is called Russian. --Unissakävelijä 15:47, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep Russian roulette and Delete Russian Roulette. Roulette is more in-depth and amusing. --Trevie 18:34, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)


It's just shit. --Caiman 15:17, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I started to rewrite it, but probably didn't really improve it much. --Spintherism 17:58, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I'm going to give my rewritten version a vote for Delete --Spintherism 03:49, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite - It has promise. --Trevie 23:55, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Rewrite Should be given chance. --Unissakävelijä 12:32, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Was QVFDed --IMBJR 09:42, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite/Expand The first sentence has a little gleam of potential. --Spintherism 17:45, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Loony Tunes

Was QVFDed --IMBJR 09:37, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite - Definitely has potential. In my opinion, it needs to be slightly more Looney Tunes-related. --Trevie 18:39, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Is this something that KP and MM want to use?--Sir Elvis KUN FIC Bur. | Petition 14:10, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Archived VFD Discussions