This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
I rewrote it, but somebody reverted it because I "took too much out". --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 05:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep. Face it, it could be much worse, and if it gets deleted, it will probably return in just such a worse form. Does that make sense? Oh, and piffle. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - emc's version is good. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Original author is still editing it. Fo' sho'. --Dexter111344 01:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Not bad enough to be considered WIP abuse. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Total carp. Ermm, crap. I know there's a WIP tag on it, but it hasn't been seriously changed for some time now. ~ 20:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - This deserves to go on VFD. In fact when I get the chance I'm going to put it on there....I'm....pissed.The Oblong Lobster 21:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
The only bit that I liked (and earlier, cuter version of the picture) is gone, and deleted, so there's nothing worth saving. Pages like this are hard, as they tend to just come off as racist or, in this case, anti-semitic.SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Dear Doctor: It has been seven days, nutty bunny. Oh, you must be on the metric calendar. In that case, let me rephrase; it's been eleventeen kilo-metrons. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
We are all confused, I think. The blurb for the construction template states that "Pages that have not been edited in more than a month can be assumed abandoned or finished, and may be deleted or have the tag removed.". The seven day thing is a difference between VFH & QVFD. Or maybe Wip. What we need, I think, is more templates. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Give it a chance Ok, first of all, it is WIP, you should give it a chance, I'm hoping I can get this improved a few days or so.--Dark Paladin X 22:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Woop!. Okay, I'll admit that I doubt this will survive VFD when it, inevitably, arrives here in a week, if that future version is like the current version. I, personally, probably wouldn't vote at all on it (ignorance of the subject matter is a shitty excuse for voting to kill what may, in fact, be a merely mediocre page). That being said, however, it's a WiP, you heartless villains. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep I don't like Pokemon. In fact, I hate it. But, the WiP template promises seven days since the last edit by the author(s). The template might as well be VFDed if it isn't going to save an article from a quick deletion, anymore. --Dexter111344 02:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. As per MO. ~ 07:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. All we are saying is give piffle a chance (although the userspace move sounds like a plan, Hannibal). --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Not bad enough to be considered WIP abuse. Plus, it's less than two days old. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Nom/Delete House request by LjLego. For some reason, I can't bring my self to disagree. Uncanny.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 20:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete This shall be the return of the super-long Ljlego delete reasons! Perfect place to begin. First off, I realize this is technically a WiP, but from what's there so far, this is not keepable by any means. If this subject matter were even to be expanded further, it would still remain utter shit. It randomly namedrops people, places, things, and other famous entities that make absolutely no sense within context or without. It pushes quite a few of my buttons, including referencing emos poorly, referencing Pokèmon period, etc etc. There is absolutely nothing redeemable about this article. DELETE!-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 20:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Pokemon? Why does a computer game need more than one article. Can't there just be one called Pokemon? Am I making any kind of point? The Oblong Lobster 21:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. The only person who should be writing about Bloodbath is KP. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete 5 Minutes: My head hurts after reading that. 13 Minutes: Stop with the upper-case it forks my soul. 25 Minutes: I Fly In a Helicopter and shoot Mr T. 90 Minutes: What's...who?...help me. The Oblong Lobster 21:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Not written like an UnNews article at all. And he really could have written this in a much less annoying and idiotic way. --Dexter111344 02:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep. I can't vote to kill a page where the main character dies in a juggling accident. I've got the circus in my blood. Also herpes, but that's another story. I'll tell you all about it when Herpes Hitler is created before coming here. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep and I think Herpes Hitler(though not existing... yet...) should be featured. Immediately. --Dexter111344 17:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep decent enough --Kpmartin18 18:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep Just because one unfunny Hitler article goes doesn't mean the good ones have to. {Randomjunk52}11:09, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Awful formatting--SirManforman 15:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Deleted Was invented in 2045 but was first conceived in 2101. Where's the narrative. Come on people!!!! The Oblong Lobster 16:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I once called the Kim Jong-Il "D3AR L3AD3R" as a bit on a page. I hope it was funnier than this page. I'm scared to check, now. Hold me. *shiver*SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete It mentions two distinct years of creation, and they happen to be about 70 years apart. This is the second thing that says delete. The first is the inclusion 1337 in the title and in a "quote" from Adolf Hitler. I've grown to despise the quote mechanism, though used well it does add quality. Though I'm tempted to give it redemption for linking Nazi, I just can't let this tripe make it past this. Look at the formatting! That alone makes it work killing. Rampant namedropping and randomness help the matter. Fact: this article sucks.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 20:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I was clicking the Random page and stumbled across this and decide to fix some of the red links. I didn't realize it one of the Hitler's on VFD. --Dexter111344 21:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Why do people keep picking on Hitler? He did keep the trains running on time. Oh, that was Mussolini. Wasn't Hitler the guy who couldn't lie about cutting down a cherry tree? No? Oh, carry on. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 15:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Waek Keep Not authored by Cheeseboy by any chance is it? The Oblong Lobster 12:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Funny I'm keeping it --Kpmartin18 18:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Oh come on: "Still on the top of this high hill the giant windmill turns, implacable as Halle Berry, majestic as Cheech and Chong." There's funny stuff here, tho' I say it wot shouldn't. ----OEJ 00:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Some funny there. Most of the problems could be fixed by UN:PS. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep per Cs1987. --Dexter111344 17:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Good Enough --Kpmartin18 18:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep Pretty average, but only seems to have been nominated because of the author. The Oblong Lobster 20:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep and tag with rewrite, along with the rest of Cheeseboy's Franz Ferdinand series. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Changing my vote to an abstain based on the Alex Kapranos re-nom above, and the fact that this is average, as Lobster says, rather than deletable tripe. (I was in a bad mood last night when I made the original vote). However, it still doesn't have any laughs that I can find. Is it too late to ICU it? If so, maybe a rewrite tag? --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
To old for NRV, but nor for a re-write tag--SirManforman 11:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Vote stricken again as per other Franz noms - it's not dreadful, just not funny. ICU or re-write tag? Still want to know what Cheeseboy's FF obsession is about though... --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep Has a kind of random amusing strangeness to it. The Oblong Lobster 14:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Per the Lounge Request--SirManforman 01:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Random, with a few good phrases. Borderline incoherent: look at the "where it comes from" paragraph. Underdeveloped. ----OEJ 03:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Weak Delete I agree that it isn't that great, but perhaps we can consider a merge (or at least redirect) to Milk. Pentium5dot1 01:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I made it less bad. Also, more better. I do that sometimes. Then I went to the bathroom. You're out of toilet paper. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 20:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
If this gets deleted, can the deletor (or deletrix) put a copy under my userpage? I've smoothed out some of the wrinkles on the page; I'm hoping Sophia returns so that I can finish. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Abs. It's a bit dull, but hardly horrible, and could be rescued with a re-write by someone who knows anything about the place (which counts me out). --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 10:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Additional: I've now dealt with the red links, sorted some spelling and removed a couple of the more pointless lists. Better? --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 10:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
This is an article written by one of the noobs I've adopted. It has had an NRV tag for nearly a month and it is going nowhere, with the author and IP addresses crapping it up, it seems to be going nowhere. I Pee-Reviewed it, and it appears he hasn't taken my advice. --SirManforman 20:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Crap in pretty much all respects. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 14:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete- I want to cry. I want the tears to drop onto my keyboard rendering it useless against the terrible irrelevence of this moment. The Oblong Lobster 19:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Shitty band-related shit And, I literally mean shit. As in, this is as crappy as what you can find in your septic tank. No, seriously. --Dexter111344 02:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - The main problem is that most of the ideas are random and no doubt irrelevant to the actual town. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
When I see this on Recent changes, it gets uglier every single time, even the NSFW tag on it isn't enough. Encyclopedia Dramatica style userpage--SirManforman 12:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete This is pointless borderline porn. The Oblong Lobster 15:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I don't thik we're allowed to touch user pages? Are we? I don't know. I once knew but those days are gone. The Oblong Lobster 13:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
CVP as well to prevent further re-creation--SirManforman 13:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
CVP a userpage? That's just a bit too far... ban the user a bit and warn him to not place the pr0n back again or else there will be bigger troubles. That seems more logical. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Fuck Yeah - This one has really been pissing me off for the last few days. I'm still waiting for an admin to ban the author. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 14:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep: It's not doing anyone any harm, it has its moments, and got two fairly good Pee Reviews - one for 29 and one for 46, which makes it a 35/50 article. It's one of the better articles in Uncyclopedia. --Andy the Idiot 22:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I like it. You would understand it better if you were Australian. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 02:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. This would make sense if you were an Aussie. I'm not, which explains why my koalas keep dying. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Regarding what happened today with part of the team being arrested, i think it should be kept. And it does make more sense if you are Australian, which i am. --Brayds2006 11:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - It's HILARIOUS! You have to watch the show to get it. Whoever did that pommy and yank thing on page, BRILLIANT!
Keep I've never voted keep so many times on VFD as I have done in the last few days. There's a lot worse than a lot fo the stuff that's being nominated at the moment. The Oblong Lobster 11:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Low quality. Superfailed VFH nom. OA is a few bricks short of a smokehouse.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 12:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete, but Christ, Flammable, read the rules of VFD! 15 nominations only! Delete some of the fershlugginer articles below you before here do this. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 14:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
We didn't have no stinkin' VFD Rules before I came back. Also, I think I counted 14 this morning. Othwerise I would have cleared some out. Unless I'm confusing that with Monday morning. *shrug*--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I have seen proof that a American Man Eating Hawk [1] does exist so I am willing to bet this one exist also. —The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Not great. I was expecting a Mexican man eating an eagle. That would've been cool. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's alright. It's kind of like a Wednesday. The Oblong Lobster 11:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Low quality. Either that or Move to Namespace if being Pee Reviewed.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 12:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Ehhh... I'm not sure which way to vote for this one. Count this as an abstain. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Can I vote for my own pages? You can on VFD... --Andy the Idiot 22:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete--SirManforman 21:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Video games are rich in shite humour The Oblong Lobster 21:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Unless I am mistaken some of the names listed (poojoo and maverick) are users on the MPC forum. And the article is mostly injokes for CSS gamers. ----OEJ 23:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Underdeveloped. But see comments. ----OEJ 03:20, 5 September 2007
Naaaah... I AM a matemagician - and that's not good enough! (BUt I'll give the page a plus for linking to George Cantor --SwamiA. Suresh 15:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
(UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
The version nominated for VFD had a section titled "Proof" deleted. I restored it; it's mostly satirical maths. This may make it more interesting to some geeks smart people. ----OEJ 03:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
See the revision history: the second section was originally a list defaming what I believe are the admins of an Internet forum. I replaced it with the snotty bit about vindictive cyberbullies before the article made it onto the VFD list (which was full at the time). ----OEJ 03:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete--SirManforman 21:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete because idiots keep adding stupid shit and I can't decided what needs to be removed(and it is clear that I've tried; check the page history). This should just be completely deleted and allow someone(not me) to write it completely over. --Dexter111344 00:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep (a) Look him up on Wikipedia it even mentions who he is in this article. (b) This was just voted to be kept. (c) Stop being a plank Manforman The Oblong Lobster 20:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep/ineligible. And it's not as bad as the other Franz-related articles by Cheeseboy. He seems a bit obsessed. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
This was recently kept via VFD, but I'm re-nominating it based on the fact that (a), who the hell is this person and (b), looking the other articles written by the same author, people finally seem to realize just how awful his articles are based on the comments shown below--SirManforman 20:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Just because someone has a Wikipedia profile doesn't mean we know who he is here. All of his articles are being voted to be deleted, and it looks like everybody thinks the rest of his articles are crap, so I thought I'd give it a 2nd go--SirManforman 20:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
He's the lead singer of Franz Ferdinand. And who are you referring to as the 'we' in your 'we know'? The Oblong Lobster 21:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
If you know who this guy is, than why don't you do a re-write and make this article better?--SirManforman 21:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Why would I want to do that? The Oblong Lobster 21:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
(1), it needs a re-write, (2), since it's probably going to be deleted and you know who the guy is, wouldn't you want to whip it into shape to save it from deletion?--SirManforman 21:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep - It's long, random and hard to read, but that's the entire point of the article. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Yep. Could do with some good pictures. ~ 07:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. It's not bad in places. Although I to disagree with Cs I think that improving the formatting and readability would help it. And some pictures. Possibly rewrite tag it and see if it gets picked up in conservation week. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep I'll try working on rewrite for it or atleast add some pictures to it.--Scott 01:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep but touch up. needs to be more than a bunch of paragraphs. a few random pictures would work... JediBobThings I've saidThings I've done 22:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Yet another random, unfunny character/meme blending article. Also, the rather similar Satan-Shadow needs to be VFDed when there is room to do so. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I don't know who's telling these popular historical figures and video game characters to suddenly merge with each other, but if I ever see the person, I'm going to rip them a new one. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Well, for the occasional not too bad one (Velvet Revolver), there's a load of crap, and it's a potential abuse magnet as Flammable observes. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 13:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. This article thinks Fallout Boy "Fucking sucks ass". Fallout Boy, you've met your match. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I find potential for either abuse of or irritating edits on this page. Thoughts?--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
"Fudge Tunnel - The name says is all." I bet I'm the only one here who thinks that one is funny. Even though it should say "The name says it all." --Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete and CVP. I'll try to work on a good version of this article, for once. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:18, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Note: The previous version I referred to at the Poopsmith's Lounge was under the capitalization "DragonForce". If this is deleted, consider CVPing both titles until somebody produces an approved rewrite. Pentium5dot1 04:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete--SirManforman 01:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Often I give article this long a pass, but this one is so horribly malwritten it should be destroyed. It abuses everything from plurals to contractions. It is a mess. ----OEJ 03:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Random and listy. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 02:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete...yes, and badly written. "The reason for this is because most of the MiG:s havn't been In a lack of maintainence since the collapse of the Soviet union" should win some sort of lethal prize for badness. ----OEJ 03:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Mostly random, poorly written and unfunny. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 02:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Ditto Cs1987's comments. Look at this: "Or counter strike barbie is gay you know? gay as in FUCKYOU?" Just bad. ----OEJ 03:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Del Taco Plain Stupid, and the article kinda changes subject from CS to WWF wrestling. —The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. You think I'm funny? Funny how? Funny like this article? But this article's not funny, you fuck! --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Puns shouldn't be used for evil. Except when I make 'em. I'm punny. /me shoots self in head SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Crap stub. /me shoots Modus in head a second time, because it looked like fun. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I ICU'd it god knows when, and it is going nowhere--SirManforman 01:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Per ICU and nom. It should have had an expired ICU but it was vandalisem and was reset. I had to reset it again when I added the {{VFD}} tag to the page. This page goes in to very little detail and is only funny for a millisecond after that its total crap. Also the secret is total Bullocks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added bySawblade5 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep It made me laugh, AND I'm not drunk...well not what I call drunk. The Oblong Lobster 11:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Part 2 of 2 of my "Too long, too pointless, too random" series. Huff and redirect to Recursion, or something similar. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Huff and rewrite, jettisoning the entire current text. EugeneKaywuzhere(whinethank)08:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. While I', sure there is potential for a good article on infinity, this isn't it, and I don't see it has any potential to be improved either. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 09:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete per Kip the Dip--SirManforman 13:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Random BS about a non-existing subject that the author keeps linking to from math and chemistry. Not fun. --SwamiA. Suresh 16:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
DeleteArticle hasn't changed since I tagged ICU on this article on 8/25. Style is a total rip from a conservapedia article, it lacks humor and is completely random. Even as liberal, I find this article to be stupid with nonsense jokes. And trust me, I can make fun of other liberal commentators as well.--Dark Paladin X 14:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Blegh. The one thing I hate the most about bad articles is truly unsightly formatting. This has it. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Maybe should be renamed to 20 Movies rather than 100. The Oblong Lobster 11:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - based on the following criteria:
It's a worst 100 list. With it only counting down to 85, It's far from a 100 list
No Images
AND, it's not good--SirManforman 01:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. You anti-list Illuminati folk are getting on my back, though. Saying to delete simply because it's a list shouldn't cut it. Luckily, this article sucks anyway, as does an incomplete list. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
If you read my comments, you'll see my reasoning and why I voted to delete. There are good lists such as Worst 100 Ways to Deliver Bad News and several others. I am not anti-list, I am anti-bad list.--SirManforman 01:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete -- Dancing cat is not enough to save this overall piece of crap. User:SlAveMAstErSquArED.sig 8:14, 3 September 2007
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 15:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Flamethrower I expect hundreds of Jews AND Christians find this to be really stupid and offesnive. Hitler hates them anyways.--Dark Paladin X 18:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
* It's not that funny but it certainly not stupid enough to deserve deletion. A bit of good editing is in order. --Omb 18:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Agreed with Omb, I try to make it NOT stupid, but didn't bring out some humor Digi should reconsider on revamping the article.--Dark Paladin X 14:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. There may have been something funny at the end, but I hadn't the will to get far enough to find out. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 08:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete Lazy, crappy...It makes me cry. The Oblong Lobster 11:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)