Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive85

• Delete - Weird unfunny stub. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Bizarre and bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 18:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Gamecruft. ----OEJ 02:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

The big man is really like a Scottish Chuck Norris, I see no reason why it should be deleted. I believe you are being to strict over an article about a pop culture character you may not have seen if you live south of the border...

• Delete - Pretty much all of this is quotes, namedropping and a list. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. "The big man is really like a Scottish Chuck Norris" - reason 1. Also, I've spent a lot of time north o' the border, and know that Scots are capable of being very funny. This is not funny. It's listy, badly formatted, full of unfunny quotes and not particularly coherent. There we go, random unsigned person, plenty of reasons! /me dons flameproof jacket --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Ditto to Uncer_user, and what's with all the unnecessary and ungrammatical capitalization? Di' ye nae ken th' spellin'? ----OEJ 02:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Scrap -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. At first, this was Big Boss related crap, but I tried to fix that by removing all BB references. Needless to say, the rest of it is also crap and whatever continuity there was got severed with the removal of Big Boss. A delete would be best. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 20:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. We do need a good article on the Joker. But this mess isn't it. As TKF found, I think this would be really tough to fix in its current state, so purge it and when someone (funnier than me) has inspiration, they can start afresh. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:31, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Early 2006 stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Random, stupid and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Worst sentence: "It didn't took long and Simon heard strange noises from the attic, he checked the attic ussing a2fsck -y and found a portal, which he intered, WOW! WTF?" ----OEJ 02:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• genus previously known as towncruft Sir Roger 08:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Random, dull, listy, devoid of any humour. Take it away. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - The less said, the better. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Stubby, poorly written, picless. ----OEJ 02:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Sir Roger 07:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Huh? No really, huh? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - WTF? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. See John of Leiden on Wickedpedia.----OEJ 02:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Sir Roger 07:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Stub. Dull. Wouldn't be missed. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Ozcruft. Mildly funny, but not funny enough or good enough in other respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Sir Roger 07:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Dull, stubby, random, blah blah. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Random stupid unfunny stub. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Sir Roger 07:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. You really have dredged up a lot of random & dull stubs today, haven't you Sir Roger? How you must have suffered! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Yet another random unfunny stub. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Sir Roger 07:32, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Pointless, a bit random, and dull. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Randull at it's worst. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Randomstupidunfunnystub. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Sir Roger 07:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Random junk. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Random, unfunny stub. Surprisingly no namedropping though. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Genus previously known as schoolcruft Sir Roger 07:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Stubby, unfunny, vanity, eminently huffable. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Obviously. Nothing about this is the slightest bit redeemable. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• genus previously known as 2005cruft Sir Roger 07:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Also known as unfunny stub. With a list. Hnng. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Long, unfunny, and a magnet for IP stupidity, vandalism, and vanity. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete On penalties! It still hurts The Oblong Lobster 23:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. As per LedBalloon. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Much like Russian Reversal, it has its place. Oh. Bad example. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• This is the third time I vote keep. Hands off Chuck! ~ 07:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - It's the third most edited page on the site, which suggests it is fairly popular. Also, this is far less annoying as a subpage than sticking the huge list on the article. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I realise it's illegal to contemplate deleting Chuck Norris cause he'd probably kill me with his eyelid or something equally as shit. But do we need the facts? The Oblong Lobster 21:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Fucking kill it You can find this crap elsewhere on the internet. It's pointless and not funny anyways. Roman Dog Bird 23:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Roundhouse kick it to oblivion -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• This was twice before nominated for deletion this year, and kept both times. It's best to avoid clogging up VFD with kept articles, so there is a notice on each article's talk page. Having said that, I can see why anyone would want to delete this! Sir Roger 06:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I know the Chuck Norris article has been nominated twice, but I didn't realise the Chuck Norris/Facts page, which is just a list, had been. If it has then I apologise. The Oblong Lobster 08:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

See here. ~ 13:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

• Kept providing the discussion here comes to fruition. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 08/14 14:33

• Nom and delete Part of it is copied straight off WP, the rest is just crap Randomator 20:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Roger 06:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Dull stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Totally unfunny and short. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

• Jesus say kill this article. ~ 10:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. And - for once - I agree with Jesus. RabbiTechno 15:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Even Jesus realises that when an article's going badly, sticking a list in it is just going to make matters worse. The Oblong Lobster 23:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The type of drivel that gives fanboys a bad name. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Pretty much every aspect of this article is bad. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I reckon it's a "needs pruning" case not a "delete" case. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete RabbiTechno 16:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - This is currently irredeemable Texas toast. It needs deleting so the next version does not resemble this one. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Agreed. And this is almost worth it on its own: "sucsess". Sigh. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Band/vanity cruft. RabbiTechno 15:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Next time, an ICU would have helped. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. And she wiiiiiiiiiiiiilll be huffed! -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete this awful sexcruft. Sir Roger 05:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I think I'd rather listen to one of their songs than read this again. It must be bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 09:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

@Delete The first quote is reason enough. RabbiTechno 15:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• But it's used by things in userspace. Sorry. And uploaded by Codeine, so go complain at him. If you dare...! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• I was disappointed to find out that this kind of gross ED style picture, survived here for so long. ~ 22:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete This image is more offensive and not at all funny. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete Are we supposed to vote differently depending on who uploaded the picture? The Oblong Lobster 23:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Sir Roger 05:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Oh man, this doesn't so much cross the line as not notice the line is there and whoosh past it at speed. Don't care who uploaded it, it's awful. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as per Mordillo's comment. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• I really have to be blunt on this. I don't care who uploaded this one or for what it's used. This is where humor ends. The usage of this picture as having a humorist value is an abomination to me. I'd like to see someone dare uploading a picture of the VTEC massacre's victims thrown all over the place and write "I PWN YOU NOOBZ" and not getting infinibanned on the spot. These are human beings, tortured and gassed to death - and this picture has no place here whatsoever. Nor would any other picture showing bodies, victims etc. Have we lost all sense of what's humor and what not? ~ 23:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Shotgun Roman Dog Bird 16:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Ooh deary me, that is a bad one. RabbiTechno 16:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Name-dropping and prostitution. I don't envy you having to sit in the front seat of this one Rabbitechno.  :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - The humour in this is awful. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. There was humour? Must have missed it. I'm not reading it again to try and find it though. Ugh. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 09:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Um, it's just a list of names and two pointless paragraphs. Not even funny ones. RabbiTechno 16:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• There she goes -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Too new, ICUed -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:03, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Lackluster idea with poor execution. --General Insineratehymn 15:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. That's a bit generous from Insineratehymn. Bad idea, please execute. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete RabbiTechno 16:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Weak Delete "...but have you ever heard of Alexander the Grey-t, the famous Greek-ish philosopher." No, no I haven't. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:18, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 09:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub --General Insineratehymn 15:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. And again random stubbiness. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete RabbiTechno 16:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete Too based on truth, no funny. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 09:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub --General Insineratehymn 15:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Further random stubbiness. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete For using the word 'effected' in place of 'affected.' And being rubbish. RabbiTechno 16:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The Clouders are those people who add milk after they've added tea, thereby causing a cloudy appearance to the beverage. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete - Weird and unfunny stub. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 09:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub --General Insineratehymn 15:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Utterly random as well. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete RabbiTechno 16:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 00:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Roman Dog Bird 15:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I cry when articles deserve to die. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Eew, eew and thrice eww. As they say in Beverly Hills, I expect. RabbiTechno 16:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Serj Tankian -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 00:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Roman Dog Bird 15:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing going on. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete RabbiTechno 16:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)\
• Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 00:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Holocaust -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 11:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 15:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Pretty well beyond redemption. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete' Very poor. RabbiTechno 16:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete And the Phil Ken Sebben should read "Ha ha! Female impersonation!" not "Ha ha ha! Female impersonation!" --Dexter111344 22:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I have no idea what Dexter is on about but I whole heartedly agree with him. The Oblong Lobster 23:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Lame. Very lame. Also, a bickering ground for the members of the local American school (ACS). ~ 23:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Sexyness -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 11:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Its not funny, its poorly written and its just plain crap in my opinion -- (Bonner) (Talk). 22:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• "New episodes every week until I'm dead". ~ 23:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Sucks ass Roman Dog Bird 23:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Hufflete -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 11:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub --General Insineratehymn 02:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Really dull old stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Tiny picless embryo of an article. ----OEJ 16:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Articles are both the exact same and have no real humoristic value. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 23:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• QVFD both -OR- ICU one and QVFD the other. I see no real need for an hour old article to be put on VFD -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• DELETE Just in case it doesn't get QVFD'd...DELETE with extreme prejudice. ----OEJ 16:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 11:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Since it's my screw up on IRC since I did not know the exact age of the article, I QVFD them both. --~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  00:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. See below. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Anything with 'æ' is evil. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 01:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. As per TKF. Again. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• I very much wish that a substantial article about a non-British, non-American place which rates a Wikipedia article of its own could be retained. Yes, the prose is bad -- it reads like it was written by a Norwegian or something. And truly it has not been revised and polished to the standards we would wish. But we have the skills to do that. (If I had the time to do it today I would be voting Keep instead of Abstain.) Articles on places like this could enrich our international perspective considerably. ----OEJ 16:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Overall badness, possibly vanity/towncruft. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Unlike Reston, Virginia, there isn't anything particularily notable about this town, should it exist. In addition, it sucks. --~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  21:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 01:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. As per TKF. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unlike Bærum, this "town" rates no entry in Wickedpedia, and the article itself is short and stubby. ----OEJ 16:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Fuk Why didn't I vote delete on this sooner? -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --Dexter111344 21:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep and revert to the first version that got deleted, but not the latest. Too many newfags edited the latest one, and might've sparked Matt Lobster's shitting up. If you guys are so stuck up about not reverting it, then just delete all together.--TravisBatos 20:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and Protect - Seriously, this needs to go. It's been created and huffed too many times to remain here. In fact, so much controversy was caused by this, a user threatened on the talk page to go to ED and leave Uncyc forever. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 19:47, August 10, 2007
• Delete and CVP. --General Insineratehymn 19:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --Dexter111344 19:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• CVP. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This'll be the third time in a month. Kill it forever!! The Oblong Lobster 20:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, CVP, and wait for me to write a new version. If I do. If not, who's gonna miss this page?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• For the love of god, CVP Roman Dog Bird 21:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• What above said. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• I always disliked that one. ~ 23:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh God, please no more new versions.--TravisBatos 21:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Scatological listyness at its worst. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --Dexter111344 19:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• go eat shit fuckers -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Fisher Price is way better --General Insineratehymn 22:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Grim. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:39, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Short, listy. ----OEJ 16:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete.--Chrissy 19:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub of complete randomness. --General Insineratehymn 19:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Not funny at all, a stub and also total randomness -- (Bonner) (Talk). 19:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --Dexter111344 19:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete More random than a shimmery Texas toast. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Tragic, and utterly befuddling. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Almost surrealistically stupid. ----OEJ 16:43, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub of complete randomness. --General Insineratehymn 19:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Random, stub, crap. 'Nuff said -- (Bonner) (Talk). 19:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --Dexter111344 19:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Heehee - anti-Moses - you couldn't make it up. Well, I guess you could. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Gave me the shitz -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete. -- Mitch 13:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. As per the above. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Randumb and stubby. ----OEJ 16:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Got the joke, did laugh. I expect someone will pick this up and run with it some day, meanwhile I'm content to let it be small. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Potential Sir Roger 08:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub. Yes, I get the joke, and I didn't laugh. --General Insineratehymn 16:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 16:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Kill Not funny -- (Bonner) (Talk). 19:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --Dexter111344 19:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Short. Joke would have been funnier if the record were the criminal, not the buyer. D'oh. ----OEJ 16:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Should have been on QVFD Randomator 15:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - WTF? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Huff - I bet it will feel just like a kitten. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Send to Room 101 for questioning I must know...a species of what exactly? Kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, and genus would be nice to know. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 06:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 06:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The person who wrote this was apparently Anti-Behari... whatever Behari is. --Dexter111344 07:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Random, stubby badness. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I have nothing to say about this article except that I would've QVFD'd it if I caught it too.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Remove Someone explain why our QVFD crap net didn't catch this...-- (Bonner) (Talk). 19:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Probably some sort of Indian racism; short and stupid anyway. ----OEJ 16:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Roman Dog Bird 23:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Crap article, mostly composed of ridiculous hating on people you wouldn't know about unless you attend school there(which I don't).     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      05:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• IT'S OVER 9000! - That refers to it's suckiness. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as...vanity? Random ramblings? Schoolcruft? Yes, "schoolcruft"...that will do. (The fact that I had to invent a new word to describe how bad this article is should say something.) -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 06:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 06:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• !!!IT'S UNDER 9000!!!Schoolcruft has already been used before. You didn't invent the word. --Dexter111344 07:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Random vanity schoolcruft rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Randomator 15:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I am not going to use one word to describe the crappiness of this article. I will, instead, say what makes it exactly so sucky. "History: it was realy big then it all got sold off" is awful, its lead has grammar and sentence structure that kills me (and that's the longest part), and the giant templates that take up 1/3 of the space don't help either.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Rubbish Please get rid -- (Bonner) (Talk). 19:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• FAIL Roman Dog Bird 23:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Umm, I think you's better check your comment Capercorn, as it doesn't appear to apply to this article. This isn't too bad. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep --Dexter111344 06:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Capercorn... :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• keep does need development though Randomator 15:15, 10 August 2007

(UTC)

• Keep Needs a little help, but it does have some good parts -- (Bonner) (Talk). 19:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

*Huff - Vainity about a random city in Wisconsin. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 04:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - Sorry, just got in a huffing mood. Nom revoked. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 07:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Kept. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 08/10 23:15

• IT'S OVER 9,000!!! Though the lists should probably be shortened a bit. --Dexter111344 19:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - IT'S OVER 9000!!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, and delete those 3 giant lists. Or at least excessively trim them. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• KEEP!!! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 06:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• K9000P -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Delete. Shitty meme, shitty article. This kind of thing belongs on ED, not here. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• You know what's NOT over 9000? THIS ARTICLE! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! --General Insineratehymn 02:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Dragonballcruft Lists, excessive name dropping and lists, ugh. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:54, 10 August 2007

• What lists? Those three very short ones with under 25 things on them total? I also see very little "name-dropping". Please vote again, madam. --Dexter111344 06:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• One, don't call me madam. Two, as Codeine said, don't tamper with my vote. Three, I looked again, my vote stands, the article is still rubbish. Sorry. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:34, 10 August 2007

• Hm... HUFF. KILL IT WITH FIRE. LISTCRUFT. Seriously, I hate listcruft. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• What lists? Those three very short ones with under 25 things on them total? Vote again, sir. --Dexter111344 06:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete I liked the original YouTube video for its sheer randomness. Unfortunately, the written sequel simply didn't live up to its predecessor. I give it 2000 out of 9000. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 05:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I realise that as a non-Dragonball fan, I may be missing out on some incredible joke or subtle humour here. Somehow, though, I doubt it. --Under user 08:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• while I wouldn't say delete on the premises that this is based off a youtube meme, any list deserves burnination --» >UF|TLK|▋» 14:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It links three YouTube videos. These are the funniest things out of the article. Like Dirty Potter, it is the article, not the media, that people will care about.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Most of the lists and/or name-dropping are now gone. --Dexter111344 05:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Ok, now its just plain ole crap, instead of crap with lists and name dropping. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:43, 10 August 2007

• Makes me laugh. Needs improvement, though. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• Keep, remove dodgy images and fix up formatting. Also needs an expansion tag, since it doesn't seem to be complete. Still, it's a good idea. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep "We have no credit cards, just extremely annoying and unhelpful mottos like 'What goes around, comes around' or 'C'est la vie'." -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 06:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep I didn't laugh out loud, but deep down in my heart, I can feel that this article has potential. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 06:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Hehe I suppose its a start Randomator 15:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Good random idea. The fact that it executes its randomness slightly better than awfully is reason enough to keep it. Bonus points for the presence of relevant pictures.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It made me smile...and I like the fact at the top -- (Bonner) (Talk). 19:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete --Dexter111344 00:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Random, unfunny, boring and just plain stupid. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:44, 09 August 2007

I don't know. On the one hand I quite like the opening section, and the general idea. On the other, I think the rest is pretty bad, and would need a lot of improvement. Don't want to vote delete, but in the current state it doesn't grab me enough for a keep. Abstain it is then. --Under user 09:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• Kept Per the tasteless masses. Someone please help this article. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 08/10 19:27

• Weak keep because I am sad and get both the OOP stuff and the Scientology references it's mixed in with. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - I find the programming references quite funny. I don't know why, though. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep. I get the references and everything, but more because it fits with the Objectivism Oriented Programming article linked from it, which I quite like. --Under user 08:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep It induced a half-smile from me as I sit in OO programming class. Oh the irony! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:27, 09 August 2007
• Weak Keep This article is clever. While its execution is substantially lacking, it's not absolutely awful. It's aeons ahead of a lot of the crap that I see here, and in all honesty made me laugh a little. Not VFH-worthy by any stretch of the imagination, but also not VFD-worthy.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub --General Insineratehymn 23:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Insane-Contrast 11:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --Dexter111344 13:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• BALEETE -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 16:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Ooh, it feels so good to delete anything associated with Ayn Rand. Sir Roger 05:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Kill --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Weak Keep I have a weakness for biblical parody. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

If you haven't tried The Book of Accordion, I'd biasedly recommend it. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 08/10 19:25

• Very Weak Keep because I laughed when I read "Judas said nothing because he knew that he was out, for the rules had been set down by the Lord." --Dexter111344 13:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Short, but not too bad. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 16:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Throw a man a fish and...I'm not remembering that correctly. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. I thought it was funny enough. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and extend The ending is ...and you entertain him for hours. MO. Actually this doesn't necessarily require extending. I changed a couple words too. Its not often a VFD candidate inspires me to add to it! Also its not often that we see a genuinely innocent Biblical joke, I didn't find it offensive in the slightest, in fact I thought the idea of the disciples playing a game of catch very cute XD ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:31, 09 August 2007

• Old stub --General Insineratehymn 23:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Stub, unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Poor, stubby, huffable. --Under user 08:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Author could do a lot better. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 23:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Randomator 15:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It's quite random. In fact, there is little to no coherency connecting this article to itself. It's relatively innocuous, certainly, and it's not at all ranty, but that doesn't excuse it from being bad. It simply doesn't merit being on the site. It won't be missed if it's gone, and it should be.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Stagnant lists. -- Mitch 10:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Sweet mother of the blessed village cat, that's a lot of pointless listage. --Under user 12:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This just isn't funny, and then you make a bunch of unfunny lists. --Dexter111344 19:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I hate to repeat what's already been said, but this is just stagnant lists, pointless listage AND unfunny lists all in one. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:53, 10 August 2007
• Delete --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Kill it - With a chain saw. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Chi, chi, chi, chi. Ki, ki, ki, ki. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Delete. Nobody cares. -- Mitch 10:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Utter crap. --Dexter111344 19:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Geordie versus Mackem rivalries strike again. This time, at humour. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wha? VFD leaves me confused today. Almost seems like some sort of vanity page? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:51, 10 August 2007
• Delete --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Rewrite The idea of a three sided football made me laugh out loud. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Okay then --THINKER 07:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Manages to be quite silly, but not funny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Random and unfunny. Completely lost me. --Under user 09:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete At first, I thought it talking about American football. Then I realized it was about actual football. Either way, it isn't funny. --Dexter111344 19:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wha? So random and bad. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:49, 10 August 2007
• Randomcruft. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

* Keep Decent, has some funny parts, just delete some of the bad parts of it. Could use some work but is also decently funny. (Evilman)

• • Unsigned. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Long, unfunny, listy, random crap --Dexter111344 07:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - I didn't bother reading the "The Legend Of..." parts. The rest is just as crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 07:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a shame people can devote so much effort to something so unfunny. WWE Fancruft. --Under user 09:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. As a lifelong wrestling fan, it always saddens me to see how awful the wrestling articles are. This is probably the worst I've seen. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. As a lifelong wrestling article fan, it always saddens me to see how awful actual wrestling is. This, however, is an exception. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 03:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Unfunny, boring, and the huge section of The Legend of XXXXX: Killed was appalling. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:48, 10 August 2007
• Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Huff - Mockery to the city it describes. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 04:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Stupid, random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Stopped reading at "Madison is known for a wide varied of exports, most commonly the doctor and Syphilis." Was that okay? I just figured that by that point it would only get worse. Was I right? --Dexter111344 06:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Depends, do you think: "The Night Life in Madison is very diverse. It entails beautiful scenery along with the smell of vomit in the evening air." is better? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:01, 09 August 2007
• Delete. -- Mitch 07:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Poor. --Under user 09:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Richard. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete --Dexter111344 00:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Unfunny towncruft. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Nuke the town because it is not funny. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• Delete not funny, boring. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:48, 09 August 2007
• Burninate --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 04:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 07:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Yawn. --Under user 09:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Old stub --General Insineratehymn 19:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• My socks never hide/hop/whatever --Dexter111344 22:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Weird and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Mitch 05:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Stubby, random, dull. --Under user 10:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Sock it -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Delete Bad, random, stubby and boring. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:34, 09 August 2007