This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
Keep I rather like it actually - doesn't contain any goatse, merely satirises ED etc users, and does so with great restraint. I shall take a copy for my own amusement. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep I think it's ok, with a little improvement could be good --DorkLord 13:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Goatse, ED, and 4chan all in one. Oh dear. Though I thought I'd ask here first, just in case. •Spang•☃•talk• 12:09, 24 Jun 2007
Get my big book of torture. I'm going to do things to it that are deemed forbidden by the Catholic Church. --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
2005cruft, listcruft, schoolcruftSir Roger 23:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
What he said Apart from 2005cruft, which as we all know I don't like using. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Agreed that it's useless as a template, but I converted it into a dig at all the Wilde quotes instead. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
YOU LEAVE ORSON ALONE! He's Peter's closest, most dearest friend!!!!! :) --THINKER 23:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Strong Keep - Yes, it is a useless template. However, the template page itself is almost certainly the funniest template page on the site. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. Any more articles/templates you'd like me to vet? SirFamine,Gun♣Petition»06/25 13:53
Delete
Strong Delete. Another quotation template. Linked to by three "articles"; an old forum topic, a QVFD archive, and...itself. So basically not used. ――SirHeerenveen,KUN[UotMRotMVFHFFSSKCMNSOME™](talk), 22:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Quotitemplaticide --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
/me mourns passing of poor Welles, starved to death through lack of quoting. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 09:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Too listy, and even the picture doesn't manage to be funny, which is quite rare. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Randomcruft, with hilariously ungrammatical vandalism in first sentence. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep and format more like an advert. How else are you going to get people to go here? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Made-up subject, but funny, especially if you're familiar with these kind of self-named products. I've done some emergency surgery to get rid of the rubbish and bring out the funny. Also tagged British, because it's loaded with Britishness. Or at least I think that's what the smell is... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
It's not very funny but certainly not horrible. Keep, someone spent time on it. --vyvyan 22:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete High slandanity. I'll morph it into a standard first-name disambig page if a few people agree. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Blech. These "random people doing random stuff" articles suck. Stop it. --SirIsaac 00:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Please keep! Made me laugh. The text language is unfortunately necessary to get across the true awful brattiness of this kid. I can totally hear him speak tho, ya get me? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete I try not to judge sports articles as a rule, but the lack of comedy in this one is as complete as the lack of good English. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
2005cruft --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete I feel it's somehow an anti-gay rant without actually saying so... weird. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete From "What Links Here", page log, and insults at the start of it, seems to have been repeatedly recreated. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 21:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
It's a Christian Rock Band, apparently. Since I could never have possibly guessed that without going to Wikipedia, delete. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Pretty good, actually. Don't think I've seen a better web-forum-based article. I like the founder-interview style. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Well, It's kinda cute, don't you think? Sir Roger 22:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Where's Tom Mayfair when you need him? --Dexter111344 03:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete This takes me back - I remember the great animal armies skirmish of February. There were no survivors but this lone template. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I added the VFD tag. Remember this or it won't get deleted. Sir Roger 02:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Uh, yeah, I was... just testing you guys! Yes, that's it. Actually, usually it's only Famine who likes to teach people this particular lesson, but it's a good one to learn. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 08:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Not a satire of liberals, per se, but of the vitriol with which some conservatives attack liberals (and in the case of HowTo:Be a conservative, vice versa). --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 00:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Okay, now I get it, seeing both together. Sir Roger 02:10, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Nothing more than a rant. doesn't even attempt to be funny. Put it on a Conservative politics web site, not here. Sir Roger 22:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
This should be considered for deletion in conjunction with HowTo:Be a conservative. They both use the same satirical approach (overblown ranting). I don't want to see coverage
Strong keep If you (esp. Dexter) actually read past the quotes, it's quite good. I got rid of most of them. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep I think in time people will expand this, there's potential. The concept is workable. Sir Roger 22:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's kind of amusing. Roman Dog Bird 23:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Linguistic convolution! --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 00:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Funny til the second Borat quote Kill this.--Dexter111344 15:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
That's not funny. --vyvyan 23:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I read the whole thing. The first two quotes were the only thing funny on the entire page, if you call that funny. --Dexter111344 19:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry - I just get fed up of users who read a paragraph or two, give up, and vote delete without even seeing if there's anything worth saving further on. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Ditto again. I'm starting to feel like I'm being anti-Germanic here. Just nobody mention the war. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Just... stupid... --Dexter111344 15:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep It needs some work, though. Now I'm voting to keep one about dogs and delete one about cats. My beloved Oreo (God Rest His Soul) would have been pissed. Sir Roger 21:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
These articles seem intertwined. It seems that these articles exist to support one another. DELETE THEM! Also, this article seems to be talking about someone's ugly dog. It is cruel to the dog. --Dexter111344 15:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Squish --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep I am a fan of the show, and I found the masturbation references funny. This should probably be rewrote though. --Dexter111344 15:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Saw how they mispelt formely in the first sentence and quit reading. I think we do need a funny Naruto-related article. This doesn't seem to be one.--Dexter111344 15:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Gai Sensai? More like "Gay" Sensai! --GeneralInsineratehymn 20:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete A new and (so far) unused template specifically designed to add gratuitous NSFW stuff to a page. I'd have QVFDed it, but somebody already decided it wasn't ICU-worthy so we might as well vote. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 14:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete. I like the Crumb references, but I feel the article just isn't up to Uncyclopedic quality. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Umm, ewww --GeneralInsineratehymn 03:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak delete - once you get past the horror, it's... well, still deletable. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 09:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Just kidding about it probably being crap. It's fairly decent, if a little short. Maybe a little in-jokey, but that's how subjects are. Maybe a rewrite tag or some such; don't think it's delete-right-now quality. -- 21:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
2005cruft,Schoolcruft --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't think "schoolcruft" quite qualifies, as Brandeis is one of the top universities in the United States, like Harvard or CalTech or what have you. That being said, it's probably crap. I can't be arsed to read it though. -- 21:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Almost deserves a {{Qua?}}, it's so chock full of words I don't understand. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete I'm going to take a wild guess that this wasn't written by an Arts Student... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete What the crap? --El Zoof 02:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Interesting - barely even appears to realise it's being pointlessly sexist. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete It's amazing what you can find when you look at the links in VFDs... This came from the Gay Migration one, and is less good than it, so logically... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 09:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
'Twas ICU'd, so I'm letting you decide. Wait, I'm giving you power?! —Braydie 08:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete One of those pages that basically could be given any title since it bears no relevance to basilicas. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 09:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
It's a play on the similarity between basilica and basilisk. Though not very well executed. •Spang•☃•talk• 02:22, 21 Jun 2007
Throw it in the furnace with the rest. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Strange - I can't define what makes certain racism a parody and others not, but I can tell this isn't. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete My sympathy and sentimentality for these types of pages begins and ends with Chuck. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
as author of this piece of shit, I vote KILL. i wanted to rewrite this at some point but it became vanityshite and survived over a year... do me a favor and vote delete --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete By the people who brought you XR (below). Non-funny fantasy creation. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
NOS-4-A2 would have been far better as NOS-4-R2, surely? (Which, as it happens, was the numberplate of Anton LaVey's Cord 810). Missed opportunity there! RabbiTechno 17:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete Managed to get an NRV even back in 2005, and didn't change enough to be good. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Shove this into a rocket and launch it into the sun. --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete So much potential... I saw the picture and thought - surely this must be an excellent satire on those people with the white headphones surgically implanted into their ears? I was wrong. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 01:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep This is not an article in itself, but a link from Kelpan's Conservapedia page. The joke is in linking from one page to the other. Sir Roger 21:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep This is really simple. But it sort of says a lot. And that's more than I've ever said. The Oblong Lobster 22:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
It's a link from a reskin. As such, it's more of an easter egg than a standalone page. Easter eggs are generally right out in the open, right? Oh. I guess my parents were just lazy. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 22:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Linked from reskin. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 22:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
QVFD your own articles in the future if you request to have them deleted. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete You have grown to understand the errors of your ways. Sir Roger 21:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
You know, I'll admit, it could have been a lot worse. Insane-Contrast 19:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Ditto. I laughed at "The worm also opens a backdoor, making your computer very cold and draughty". I don't get this business with getting rid of your old articles. I like to leave mine to remind me how far I've come. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 01:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
QVFD your own articles in the future if you request to have them deleted. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete A bit less good than the other one, so I'll oblige you here! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 01:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
