Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive77

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Contents

Dorset

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Also, get rid of the three pictures on the article if no one finds a use for them.--Dexter111344 01:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Death Ray

Keep
It was all there beforehand - basically all I did was lop the top off to force people to read further down. Which is a bit interesting... --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • In other news, what is it with these signature deletion words at the moment? What does Mythbusters have to do with anything, or bad puns on derelict? It's not just TKF and HGG by any means, but it's starting to annoy. Just say delete if you can't think of owt else, and maybe give a reason occasionally, especially if you're nomming. Sorry if that was a bit rude, I'm a mite tired at the mo. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about the... indignation? If you found it annoying you could have said it sooner, I'm always willing to change, especially for something as petty as VFD delete euphemisms. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Sory, i watch it WAAAAAY to much. Anyway, I think I can do that. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
I can Dere-lick my own balls. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
TKF is gay? Myth plausible. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

SBU- It started with me. It's a joke! Come on, friend, it's OK, really. But guys, stop.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I thought it started with 2005cruft? --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 23:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Aww, aren't you guys good to a grouchy old woman?  :-) Right, time for sleep now. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Peh, TKF, you think so, huh? So naive. I was referring to the brief spell during which I announced increasingly absurd ways of killing the article. This actually did start an extremely short-lived trend of it, and now you guys are doing the same. Except not being creative. Hmph.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

UnScripts:The Young and the Uncyclopedians and all related pages

Keep
  • Should be obvious. Look, me, Uncyclopedian, Jocke Pirat, Gert 5, Emmzee, Enzo Aquarius, Starnestommy, and TKF all worked hard on this. Sure, it may be vanity, but it is just Usernames. And most of the characters don't even remotley ACT like the users, with only hints to what they do. And of course it's long! It's a great storyline. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep If someone would take the time to make this much crap, it should at least stand as a monument to their dedication to something otherwise insignificant. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 01:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: Er, why is ZB saying Benson is insignificant? Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • Keep. Ribbit. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 02:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The characters merely have names attatched based on uncyclopedian usernames to them. The characters themselves barely reflect the true nature of the users themselves. As you see in the scripts, there are a few in-jokes, but you can say if you strip all the usernames from all the characters, all you will have is a simple set of UnScripts just as worthy as any other. I'll bet that many of the people in other UnScripts have never been heard of either - I've made up many of the names simply to suit the purpose of a script. In addition, some of the characters are allusions to people that do matter, such as Zatoichi, a swordsman from Japanese films, Robert Gates, the Secretary of Defense, Ngo Dinh Diem and Ho Chi Minh, former leaders of North and South Vietnam. Darth Communist - a parody of Darth Vader. Hinoa Cox - an homage to Dr. Cox on the television show Scrubs. I intended Shamus to be a reference to Soccer Hooliganism and Death to Smoochy. --~ Tophatsig

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    02:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep--”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 02:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It seems like more of in-joke then vanity--Scott 03:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Scott's comment. Also, if this much work has gone into something like this, who's to say it can't get better? Besides, whoever had the honor of deleting this would have a HELL of a job with deleting every single page. --Andorin Kato 05:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I aagree with Scott. --SPAZ! | Tell me some stuff | What I've done 03:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Yeah, and delete the writers' hard work. Great idea. --?|COMRADE_PONGO_V2|RUN_CMD|RUN_GSLYR 14:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - for all the reasons outlined above. RabbiTechno 17:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep But a few of the episodes are crap. I liked most of them. --Dexter111344 20:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep or Else --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 09:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • OH DEAR GAWD, KEEP! Just because I can. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) Mchammer 02:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep! Madness, madness! These are good articles (just read a few) and though they're a tad vanity, I see no reason to delete this. Mightywayne 14:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Filled with self reference, but there has to be room for a little bit of this from time to time. Lets keep the fun. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 15:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • If Mhaille voted keep, then I'm voting keep. --General Insineratehymn 21:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Alright, when this page started out, it was alright. It was vanity, but it wasn't too excessive. Now there are several "episodes", "spin off episodes", "guest episodes", as well as several other related articles. Well, its just flat out vanity. All of the characters, in case you hadn't realized, are users on Uncyclopedia, and none of them are notable. I can only suggest that we delete it based on Codeine's Mum having heard of none of the characters, other then Codeine, I'm sure. I would huff it on sight, but I'm sure that the dedicated writers will want to try and stop me a bit first, so I'll give them a shot by nomming it on VFD. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete After reading your essay, I have concluded that you're right. Go away, TYATU!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, please-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • this is complete and utter bollocks, everyone who votes to keep it seriously needs to read UN:VAIN and HTBFANJS... keep your vanity elsewhere --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Did you every see a 6 years old 100 pound well thats my cousen Sandy she is 100 pouds I only weigh 93.0 pouns she weigh more then you thinck. About it 100 pouns for a six years old I have this frend and she is 3 years old she ran into Sandy and fell! SHe is FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT. --Katievanity.jpg 03:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Silence This, I think Codeine's Mum has heard of me after this mess. Now she won't return my phone calls. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle04:04, 16 June 2007
  • Delete. It goes under a standard namespace, and so unnotable users or IP's (As the majority of people who browse this site are), wont understand the joke. Also, I think most of the people put under there don't really like it, as it doesnt really reflect their personality. Moreso, im making an article like this, except it actually does bear relevance to Uncyc.--Small_Pineapple2.png» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 05:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nobody cares. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 05:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Tough one, but in the end, the fact that it's clear vanity, as well as the fact that you can hit it through Special:Randompage, won out. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 10:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't think this stuff is really the point of Uncyclopedia. And it's just kind of lazy. The Oblong Lobster 12:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete funny for like 2 episodes then jokes just dragged out. Chancellor Krieger 15:02, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
  • I would understand if there were only 1-3 episodes or this, or something, but with the staggering amount that are present at the moment, just letting that all go to waste could be considered a crime against Internetmanity --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 02:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Bensonites, ZB just called Benson insignificant!!! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • How about we have some kind of "auditions subpage" where users can nomainate themselves to be voted if they want to be mention--Scott 03:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Wow. It colected voted THIS fast! And I caught a fish |-THIS-| big! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Might I remind you that TYATU exaggerates all characters, and is funny! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • But Tom, the communism stopped! And the goatse too. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
    And the Star Wars! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • The and all related pages thing implies that anything even partially related, i.e. linked to in the series, is also up for VFD. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 05:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I mean, that destroys a lot of user pages, like ZB's, and Chronarion's, as well as the commie article. Wow. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
    • And a lot of Star Wars stuff, and Star Trek stuff, and any dog articles. Boy, ZB really wants to huff the wiki, it seems. Either that, or he didn't do a very good title for this part. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
    • This is all insane insane INSANE INSANE INSANE!!!! I mean delete the Grueslayer PvP TYATU battle? The Grueslayer team put a lot of work into that battle, and to have it all thrown away because there's a whiff of vanity. Why not huff everyone's User page??? They're vanity. ?|COMRADE_PONGO_V2|RUN_CMD|RUN_GSLYR 14:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
      • I mean, ZB wants to huff the article on Uncyclopedians, the article on Uncyclopedia, and a lot of other articles. And ZB, I will give you a Bucket of Piss for every important user(that includes you) who you insulted. Including you. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • The only parts I think should be huffed are the Froggy goes a Courtin' spinoff pages. Now those are pure vanity. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • TOM, STOP VOTE-WHORING!!! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • Of course, if someone would just adopt this and stick it in their userspace then the problem would just disappear... It has been a bit of community fun and probably deserves archiving somewhere (with a single redirect from the current main page), but perhaps not in the mainspace. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • There's a full copy on Starne's wiki and a full copy in High Gen. Grue's namespace. It's now more of a matter of whether people think that it deserves to be an UnScript in the mainspace or not. --~ Tophatsig

    Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

    16:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Ah, I see. Well I am slightly bitter that I didn't deserve a mention, now you come to mention it...  :-) --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • WARNING: RANT AHEAD! TURN BACK!.... Once upon a time there were a few editors who thought Uncyclopedia was their place to dump their awful unfunny shit on, while saying "Oh this user is awesome" or killing off characters based on users they didn't like. This constituted as somewhat of a vanity page. When the article was up for deletion, instead of acting civil, they all turned into Nintendorulezes and started whining and bitching about an issue that didn't really mean anything, where they could just vote keep and SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY. I'm getting seriously pissed about this whole issue. I'm UNKNOWNFILE, and I approve this message. --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Alright, now this VFD is really starting to remind me of something else. I wouldn't be surprised if this actually turns out longer. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • This is hardly comparable to Contents, though, as contents was just a gimmick page and this, on the other hand, has had tons of hard work put into it from multiple different users. I haven't enjoyed the series as much as some others, but the sheer amount of dedication to it is, in my opinion, its savior. --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 20:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • "hard work"? how is creating a series of one-liners hard work? --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
UNKNOWNFILE, it isn't one liners. We have AT LEAST 50 lines and actions per page. BASTIONS IN PLACE! FIGHT TO THE DEATH! FOR TYATU! AND FOR ASLAN! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 20:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • /me marvels at the size of the voting box --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 20:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • How the hell did I manage to get left out of this whole thing? --The Acceptable Thinking cap small Cainad Sacred Chao (Fnord) 04:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • It's vanity, pure and simple, but there's been so much written that I don't quite have the heart to vote for deletion. I do think it should be moved out of mainspace, though.--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • DON'T WRITE ANY MORE!!!! I don't want to say delete because of the huge amount of work that went into writing all these, but honestly, I think the authors should have seen this coming after writing episode after episode after episode. if they had kept it down to one script, it would have been different, but the buildup of episodes is getting irritating. Some of them have comical parts, and some of them don't, but it IS all rather vain and is getting excessive. NO MORE! AAAAA! --THE 15:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Arna

Keep
Delete
  • Delete It really is not that amazing... the subject leaves very little room for expansion, the humor (if you want to call it that) is stale, and I mean it's not like it was even written/typed professionally where I could say "Hey, atleast it's another cute little snippet on Uncyclopedia.", and go ahead and fix the grammar. What do you folks think? Mightywayne 18:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Sir Roger 04:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I think: Very thorough deletion request: 8/10. Oh, and delete. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Oh, but minus 16 points and a warning because you added it when there were already 15 active VFDs. Oops. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Moore's Law

Keep
Delete
Comments

Helvetica

Keep
Delete
Comments

Electric triangle

Keep
Delete
Comments

Alministrator

Keep
Delete
Comments

Brianwashing

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Village People

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hurricane Hugo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Blazerlight

Keep
Delete
  • 2006crap This isn't even good enough to be considered cruft. It has been edited by one IP its entire life. It is a stupid spin on the band Razorlight. I really don't see why this wasn't deleted when it was created. --Dexter111344 02:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 02:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 05:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I think the clue to the desired style is the innocently mentioned "Douglas Adams". Doesn't make it though. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 06:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Icons-flag-au Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Blue Oyster Cult

Keep
Delete
  • Generic delete message --Littleboyonly T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly 22:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, and smiley scowl at TKF. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Generic Mythbusters message --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Insert original deletion message here then followed up by a rant about how George P. Bush must be stopped from following in his uncle's and grandfather's footsteps. Then follow that comment by a remark about Al Gore winning the 2000 election. --Dexter111344 23:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • NEEDS MORE COWBELL --14px-Stupcarp_for_sig.png» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 05:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Insane-Contrast 12:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Devour --General Insineratehymn 19:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Pacmania

Keep
Delete
Comments

Rune of Hasselhoff

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Gender scale

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bicycle safety

Keep
Delete
Comments

Wooden spoon fencing

Keep

Keep So stupid it made me smile. The Oblong Lobster 12:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete
Comments

Eucalyptus-Bongo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Sultan XXXII

Keep
Delete
Comments

Feudal system

Keep
Delete
Comments

Staple graph

Keep
Delete
Comments

Old Zealand

Keep
Delete
Comments

Operation Concrete Trousers

Keep
Delete
Comments

George Jetson

Keep
Delete
Comments

The Knights Of Ni! - Frostwhisper

Keep
Delete
Comments

Scientific Classification

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kvarnavat

Keep
Delete
Comments

Luxemborg

Keep
Delete
Comments

Immortality On Earth

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 01:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 04:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • delete The article is not immortal. Sir Roger 05:40, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Obviously, this article won't be immortal. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us
  • Delete. –—Hv (talk) 16/06 09:58
Comments

Moronian

Keep
Delete
Comments

Adam Robertson

Keep
Delete
Comments

Rabirdoo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Cookers

Keep
Delete
Comments

Cluons

Keep
Delete
Comments

Infinite Paradox Theory

Keep
Delete
Comments

Marshall Leather

Keep
Delete
Comments

Time-traveling French

Keep
Delete
Comments

Hallmark

Keep
Delete
Comments

Ghatanothoa

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • This one's had many a helping hand offered, but doesn't seem to be going anywhere, unfortunately. RabbiTechno 19:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Armenian Genocide

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bacterial vaginosis

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bishop Rikstaa

Keep
Delete
Comments

Molwanien

Keep
Delete
Comments

Doctor Dolittle

Keep

Keep Eh, not as bad as I thought it would be. Needs that expansion template. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us

Delete
Comments

Adjective

Keep
Delete
  • 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 08:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • lame Kip the Dip 09:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Mitch Icons-flag-au 10:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Truly poor. RabbiTechno 17:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Indescribable. Pretentious. Embarassing. Crap.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • A disgrace that the article on something as focal as adjectives is so stubby and horrible (though it's still better than mine). –—Hv (talk) 15/06 18:43
  • Delete Destroy it Insane-Contrast 22:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  • If it takes me more than one read to comprehend an article with a joke so simple as that, it's a bad thing. --vyvyan 00:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Weebles

Keep
  • Keep Has potential. True, the article wobbles, but in my view doesn't quite fall down. Sir Roger 20:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Molerat

Keep
Delete
Comments

Extremist Muslim

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Sorry for using up half the VFD space - I've been on a bit of a watchlist cleanout since getting home from Belgium the other day. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Rihanna

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • So, is it 'Rihanna' or 'Rhianna'? Make your mind up, author! RabbiTechno 16:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

El homo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Scrolled

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Mainly just an IRC dump of waffle. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm not going to read through all that just for one joke at the end. Delete.--vyvyan 15:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
I'll spoil it for you - there isn't even that. --Strange (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Devin Grayson

Keep
Delete
Comments

Dude at OAR Concert who got in on a joint

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Not only unfunny rubbish, but a spork to boot! RabbiTechno 15:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Negro

Keep
Delete
Comments
Retrieved from "http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/archive77?oldid=5083276"
Personal tools
projects
Stillwaters chronarion.org