This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
As the reader, it should be keeped because there is more than one signed up contributer, User:Ted Ted. It made me laugh and therefore it deserves to be kept. --Bostonredsox 16:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete
The last bit of cookiecruft. I really don't need to explain. Just... look at the article. Oh, and the talk page was blanked. --AndorinKato 14:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
It's not funny and it's too short.Probably thrown together.. --Insane-Contrast 16:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment to UNKNOWNFILE The books are awesome you cunt. --Kip > Talk•Works••
Oh, so you're going to start up a flamewar for me just stating my point of view, eh? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I want to make it clear: I do not start flamewars. I just thought it would be funny to call you a cunt for a reason so frivilous. Gosh, people are so sensitive. Kip the Dip 08:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
KEEP I might try it myself tomorrow. The Oblong Lobster 21:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep I kind of like it. It seems that in 2005 people wrote a lot of short articles - perhaps it was the trend. I don't think we should get rid of them all. Sir Roger 07:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep It just needs a MAJOR expansion. --Kip > Talk•Works••
short-circuit --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Rogpyvbc: the result of that trend was a lot of cruft. We are now in the process of deleting that cruft. ?|COMRADE_PONGO_V2|RUN_CMD|RUN_GSLYR 18:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I agree most of it should be deleted. But you can't fault every author for doing what was common at the time. A few -- only a few, mind you -- that are reasonably funny should be kept. Sir Roger 05:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Kept - I've rewritten & added to this a bit, and will keep poking it for a while longer. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition»06/15 19:33
Delete - Is this just slagging off members of some school? Even if it isn't it's shite of the absolute worst order. The Oblong Lobster 20:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
force it to have sex with a woman --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Possibly the worst article everSirCs1987UOTM.t.c 06:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, this needs to die. And why does it say it's Featured? Look at the categories. --AndorinKato 06:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Why not? The first picture is funny. The article may be going nowhereish but theres no reason to delete this other than shortness. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 02:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Die! Construction since May 31st, one signed-up contributor and a bunch of IPs as the only contributors, and it doesn't look like it's going anywhere. Just more cookiecruft we don't need. --AndorinKato 00:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
it was written by cookies therefore it automatically SUCKS --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Bright and early for the daily races, going nowhere, going nowhere... --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
This crappy article could give a Grue heartburn. Kill this article before it does. --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Delete - People's use of the construction template on stuff like this is starting to annoy me. I reckon people should work on articles in their userspace. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 01:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)