This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
|-DELETE THE WHOLE PAGE!!!! IT SUX!!!! DELETE...DELETE...DELETE...there is a thing called a limit you stupid people. DELETE THE PAGES!!! ALL OF THEM!Link title
Sweet Jesus on a stick! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 12:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Heard of the place, but have no desire to go there to check accuracy. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
*Please check your spelling. That article has never existed. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 01:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Die, pickles, die --Asahatter (annoy) 08:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete "Also: I've got two pickles. I've got two pickles. I've got two pickles, hey hey hey." -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Short, stubby, random, unfunny. Delete with extreme prejudice. ----OEJ 16:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Nice idea, but a stubby bit of undeveloped boredom. ----OEJ 23:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
As per Lake Spooky I vote delete. Possibly these ideas might be good but I'd rather read them as one long article and with less random crap. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.011:55, 03 May 2007
Huff as vanity, but you needn't have nominated this for deletion. {{Vanity2}} categorizes it under NRV. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 21:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete for badness as well. ----OEJ 23:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete - My vanity tag was removed. I'll remember to watch all vanity tagged pages in future. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 07:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete per everyone. I guess you can still vanity2 tag pages after the usual week of ICU has passed? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete. The fact that somebody doesn't like something does not make their bad-tempered rantings either satire or humor. ----OEJ 23:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
radio hosts can be good sometimes but the ones mentioned in this article made me go flaccid --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:44, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Turn off Tune out. --THINKER 03:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Interfere with - the fact that the only town it can be heard in is also a redlink is the clue. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 15:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep, but it should be noted that "the armpit of Canada" is really Shilo, Manitoba. I think Thunder Bay is the elbow or something. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep - not insultingly bad. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 01:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Now you see here students, this is about a town in Northwestern Ontario in Canada. The author was bored, couldn't go out and have sex like normal people his age. Instead, he decided to write an "I hate my hometown" article. Then I came along and found this and stuck it on VFD. Any questions, class? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
"Teacher! Teacher!" /waves arm in the air enthusiastically. "Can we huff it please?" Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.011:33, 03 May 2007
Comments
If you've ever been to Thunder Bay, this page makes perfect sense. I drove through it, once. Longest eleven minutes of my life. I still wake up in a cold sweat, sometimes. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
delete words fail me just as capitals fail the author of that article. and spelling and funniness. ok so words don't fail me. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.011:23, 03 May 2007
Delete. Delete it hard: badly written, short, no pics, no funniness. ----OEJ 23:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Now that I've got the hang of weaving my way through hundreds of disambiguations, Special:Shortpages is becoming a useful VFD tool. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 03:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Ewwww I'm in the process of replacing this with one that will be placed in the right page name as well. it has basically no connection to this sad, sad article LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 22:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Erase And if you'll notice the first image, it has been oddly assembled out of 4 parts. Jedibob5 22:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Turn into a redirect. I dunno if this is delete or keep, but Books' article is far better. -- herrdoktorneedsAbolt[scream!] 04:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
bleh. I had no idea that this article was even remotely likeable. Anyway, I could just as easily move it to Fortune Cookie and put my rewrite in the old ones stead (currently under my userpage) I guess, that if we have to compromise some of the old page can stay. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 02:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
I'd move it to the proper naming so the entire unaltered text is accessible, and then paste over the page with your new work. That way, if people want bits and pieces of this mixed in, they can go back and selectively edit. And keep the cookie, because it is, in fact, quite awesome.--THINKER 05:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep - mainly because I don't want to die, but also because it's got some funnies in. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 18:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure it's a stub, but it's got some good lines. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep I added a tiny bit. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 08:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Also, stubs in series can be combined later. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 08:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Kept. It's actually funny, and the alternative would be combining all the great lakes to Great Lakes, and it wouldn't work as well then. •Spang•☃•talk• 11:52, 03 May 2007
Keep. No doubt needs some work, but I like the idea and some of the humour. Rogpyvbc 21:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep Agree with above. I actually found parts of this funnier than some VFH articles recently. Needs a rewrite. I might even lend my trivial powers to it to help save it. (Don't quote me on that) Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.003:27, 02 May 2007
Tee hee. Just saw your personal hit list title graphic UF. I don't vote keep on everything, honest! :-) -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 17:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
(/me proceeds to vote keep on everything here at the moment.) D'oh! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 18:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
If it stays, it's got to be improved big time. Right now it's just kind of a joke that begins and ends with the idea of eating wood. --Videshi 07:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
You've gotta be kidding. So a bitter, humorless fan wants it deleted? I've been a fan for more than 8 years (buying all singles and albums on release date, been to concert in Tokyo, etc.) and I say it stays. --So So 14:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep I dislike the vomiting. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 19:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep. The author is right, not everyone will get the Japanese humour. "He was Japan's leading pachinko player, with a record of 1039449 wins and 3 losses" - very funny if you're Japanese. Rogpyvbc 21:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep Because the Japanese and their sympathisers are allowed to laugh too. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 07:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep though I feel my life has been irreparably damaged by that video.. --THINKER 05:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
otakucruft. a friend who likes the subject of this article wants this nuked too --» >UF|TLK|▋» 12:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
My fourth article to make the vfd page. Hiphiphooray! --So So 14:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
oh be quiet, don't be such an ayumikitada, always whining when your articles get VFD'd saying we're all humorless... wait for the article to be kept or deleted and archive it in your userspace while it still exists --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
As a side note, if someone just wants to put an "overly Japanese" tag on it, that would be okay. The article itself is rather well thought out, but just requires some knowledge of the subject matter. No need to delete it, really. --So So 18:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
meh, let's just see what the people of uncyc think --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Neutral It's weird, but I don't know the subject so that may possibly be the point. Jedibob5 00:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
it's about a jgoth group, see en.wp. also, the weird english in question is stuff like "fuck off and wipe" --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
What he said A brief perusal failed to sway me either way. No idea of original subject but that in itself shouldn't matter. Didn't find it funny but seems to be well thought out? Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.003:42, 02 May 2007
keep I like the idea of finding a note in the future. This could be made MUCH funnier. I did a little, but I'm tired out. --Videshi 12:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Okay, I'll change my vote. So long as something is done to improve it further. I added a bit. Rogpyvbc 03:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I like this new version. Keep. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 09:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep, as per Rogyvbc, thought it could still be further expanded, and stuff. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep I didn't see it before, but right now it makes me laugh.. --THINKER 02:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
It's been added to substantially since some of the delete votes. Can it be reconsidered? Rogpyvbc 04:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
It's only another paragraph... Jedibob5 22:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
We've added quite a bit more, now. I think it's funny, at this point. Not perfect, but it no longer needs to be deleted. --Videshi 07:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
URGH... ... and the random ALL-CAPS words DON'T make it any BETTER. Jedibob5 00:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Attempt to explain joke: Echelon is a defense network designed to intercept terrorist messages in phones calls. The author is messing up this system by inserting words that would indicate a security threat (e.g. bomb) into ordinary conversation. This is very, very humourous. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 23:13, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
I added this explanation to the talk page, maybe that will help a bit? --THINKER 00:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I knew there was a template for it, and I knew it wasn't {{joke explanation}} Doesn't really lead viewers to the explanation now tho.. --THINKER 00:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Even having read the explanation first this didn't tickle my funny bone sorry. Perhaps if the whole WMD thing wasn't sooo over done. Posting this as a comment because I couldn't decide either way, so take it as a suggestion. Could be funny I guess if the subject matter wasn't kinda tired. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.003:36, 03 May 2007
Rewrite I'd say it deserves a place here, but someone needs to have it redone. Jedibob5 00:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Extremely Weak Keep I got a single laugh. If someone wants to rewrite it like Jedibob mentioned, I think it could be funny. Since its IP created and links practically nowhere, its probably not going to get what it needs.. --THINKER 05:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
VFD'd for the second time now. I'd say the otakus that wrote this are in the closet so somebody knock down the doors and drag them out. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete It sucks. This is the kind of unfunny crap that makes me cry. Ppl seem to get this idea in their heads that we care about that stuff here, and forget that Nobody cares. Huff asap Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.003:06, 02 May 2007
Delete Excellent example of why there should be some sort of IQ test before people can create/edit pages. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.003:56, 03 May 2007
Keep it has the makings of vanity, but it's pretty chuckleworthy. Needs more info on "the penguin conspiracy" though if it wants to get the aforementioned stigma off. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Keep Sorry to go so against you Insin - a lot of these seem to have the same kind of humour base, which I guess you're not fond of. But they make me chuckle, so I'm gonna have to vote the other way. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
My case for deleting this is simple: I uploaded it, and have now decided it probably shouldn't be here, because it's a copyrighted image. I understand that Uncyclopedia is rife with such things, and I'm only asking that this one, which I have uploaded, be removed. -Tritefantastic 03:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not going to officially say keep because of course I don't condone illegal stuff and never download illegal copies ever. But on the other hand, Nobody cares particularly, and the picture is rather good in context on the Lost page. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 18:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
As long as it's used for purposes of parody it falls under Fair Use. If, however, it's not going to be used, you can just QVFD it, rather than putting it here. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Tasteless, but amusing. it could have a home on the Jimbo page perhaps. --Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 16:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep, as per Olipro (except this time it's already the Jimbo page). --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Burn it --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete.~ 15:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Incinerate Tasteless and un-funny. Anyways, anyone can place a well-known figure's head over Cho's
Comments
Abstain. Even if we get rid of it now, it'll only be back again when we've moved past this a bit. So really, do what you like with it. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I know. In fact, I am myself a proponent of having an actual article (with illustrations, obviously) about the VTM. However, it seems to me that this image was created with the sole purpose of "sticking it" to the over-sensitive people on VTM talk. Yes, VTM jokes will come later - so why rush things?
I like the idea, but it's such an obscure title that it's been around forever and it's still a stub and a list. If it was a common title I'd vote to keep. Or, if it had ninjas. I've been told that they rock. By a ninja. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 11:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Though I would rename it "Muslim extremist" or something so as not to appear to paint all Muslims with the same brush. Rogpyvbc 23:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Can't red link 200+ articles, but does need touchings ups --THINKER 00:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep Funny enough, though a little anti-Islamic oriented. Ethereal 03:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep It could use a rewrite, but it's a keep. Jedibob5 00:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Stupid, not funny, looks like something a retarded racist bigot would write. --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
i will go with insinerate, if this becomes redlinked we can always rewrite it --» >UF|TLK|▋» 12:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Dear, Lord, people are never happy with this page. If it isn't insulting to Muslims, they complain. If it is insulting to Muslims they complain. If it is whimsicle and pointless they complain. If it is pointed and satirical they complain. Either try writing it 3 fucking times before voting against or make it a perma-red-link. Also, I going to semi-protect this because I am tired of cleaning up after dumb-ass "muslims r ghey" jokes by anon ips.---Rev. Isra(talk) 14:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Keep Would need a rewrite but a topic about Forum Whores or Post Whores would certainly hold potential for funnies. I personally pride myself on being a Forum Whore and would enjoy a good article about them. Having said that I'm not putting my hand up to write it, mainly because I'm not very funny. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.003:46, 02 May 2007
Delete
Delete. No significant changes in a year and a half. I don't think anyone's going to expand it. Rogpyvbc 06:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
The creator also created Category: Iceland along with this article. I assume that it will go when the page being voted on goes. (I can't link to it or it will make this into that category.) Jedibob5 00:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
shitty stub direct from my watchlist, I was going to VFD this in january but forgot about it so it's overstayed its welcome --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete: The title makes me want to think "Salt water taffy". And that's about as far as I got with that train of thought. Terrible article, though. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 06:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I'll change to a full keep because this could alert quite a few people of our presence, and okay publicity is better than none! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 10:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
2005cruft --GeneralInsineratehymn 17:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
decent idea, but articles left around to rot deserve no flesh or bones here --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
2005cruft and hideous to boot. --GeneralInsineratehymn 17:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
If there's any indication that this article has sat around for ages with nobody making improvements to it, it's probably because nobody has either found it or cared about it. As it stands, it needs a complete demolition and rebuild --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. About as funny as most internet humour. Rogpyvbc 04:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep and expand because . . . I don't know. Maybe it's listening to my very own sonata that's making me feel all warm and fuzzy inside, but I actually think that this has some sort of potential.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
2005cruft --GeneralInsineratehymn 17:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
lyk i g2g nuk a crap e stub. cya! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Short. Comparing cya and cyan is pushing it. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 01:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
It would've worked in UnDictionary, back before it collapsed, but it's not strong enough to carry a page all on its own. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 18:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak Delete Changing my mind. Kind of random, but in a bad way. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Perhaps someone should sort through the garbage Interweb speak articles and combine the good stuff into a mecha-article (as opposed to the crappy stubs that are connected by the template.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. For some reason I kind of like it. At least it has potential. Maybe better for Unpoetica, though. Or merge it with Nelson Mandela. Rogpyvbc 03:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
2005cruft --GeneralInsineratehymn 17:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
It's good? Don't think so --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Too little text, verse doesn't carry it. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 01:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - I've never voted delete for something based purely on ugliness before. How shallow I am... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete because it really is bad, somewhat racist undertones, and no redeeming quality. On Pee Review, this would get a 0. No joke.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep just in case Keitei ever has the urge to finish something! :-) -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep- I think the stub-class (and maybe an ICU to get the writer into shape) is more appropriate than all-out deletion.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep, already expand tagged by me.SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep And give me me grog! ~ 10:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Nom and delete It's a list Randomator 16:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete It's incoherent, really. Jedibob5 18:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
i'd say keep on the condition that it was funny and well-formatted, but this is the exact opposite of what i'm looking for here --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Randomator, when adding an article to VFD, make sure you tag the article with {{VFD}}.
I kinda like it. Should be heavily linked to bat fuck insane if it's gonna survive. Snail boy 15:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep and overhaul. Get rid of the crappy filler and add some new ideas, and we might have an article that's most likely not feature worthy, but certainly not VFD worthy. I'd do it if that's what is decided on. Leave me a message on my talk page if that's the case. Cheerio.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Good idea but would need more actual truly bat-related things to go between the insane padding. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Drives me bat insane.Rogpyvbc 23:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. A very fine concept, actually, but needs one hell of an overhaul. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete because it's stream of consciousness (unedited), or at least probably, and I wonder what I should have for breakfast? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I've often wondered what the hell possesses people to make this crap. Then I realize that drugs are involved, and I say "where on earth did someone get this idea from?" And then I just made a joke that's funnier than this article. Sad, no?--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:18, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
To be fair... this should have been deleted outright. DELETED --Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 00:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete because it's stupid and probably written by the very 12-year-old boy (whose brain has yet to exist) that the article refers to.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Clean-up clean-up, everybody, everywh- sorry. Just got back from my cousin's birthday party. Not like I have that song on my iPod or anything . . . --SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
proof that all that is unfunny has to be associated with otaku-ism in some way --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Atrocious --GeneralInsineratehymn 01:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
What...The...Hell? I don't know what cruft is, but if this is it, I sure as hell don't want to be involved with it at all. Absolutely awful stuff that is supposed to be . . . what? A parody of myspace? Already been done. And it's better than this.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
the article's subject is a jpop celebrity, for the uninformed. also, cruft is, from what I gather, a synonym for crap --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. It's like watching an episode of Family Guy without the cutaways. Incoherent, and not funny (as opposed to with the cutaways, where it is incoherent yet somehow funny).--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
