This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Delete - The author of this article is pissing me off. I ugly tag the article, then he/she just removes it. This either needs a rewrite or deletion. I'd obviously prefer the latter. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 07:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
I had the mana-mana song stuck in my head for four years. Four years! It eventually sped up and distorted enough that it became background noise. This should stay. The song in my head, however, should go. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 13:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Send this one to the bottom of the well. Its REALLY short and has no images, citation to real news or anything funny. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byHappy Weasel (talk • contribs)
keep & fixup - written in the style of what it's about --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Sure, it's a mess. But so is Ann Coulter. Buh dum-dum --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC) (/me exits stage right)
The article is not particularity impressive, but should be kept. GeneralTso'sChicken 03:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
KEEP- ICU is preferable to VFD. This article is needed though it is disorganized. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byHappy Weasel (talk • contribs) dif
Keep, though it's a little too close to the original for my liking. --Medvedev(scream) 13:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
KEEP WTF? Can't these fascist bully-girls take a joke? Jesus! --Curious Larry 22:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Huff and re-start. Painful. It looks like a list of dirty fantasies of Rage Against The Machine fanboys about a relatively pretty uber-conservative republican woman. -- herrdoktorneedsAscalpel[scream!] 02:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Merged with Free. Hey guys, I'm back! It looks like some people are getting too carried away with thinking of the next delightful insult to actually put down any reasons here! (Being written in 2005 is not, by itself, a reason.) This one's okay, the other (sort of copied) one is crap. We should have more talk of merging things when the only thing wrong is length, eh? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 19:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Starts off okay, but the rest is just an unfunny stub. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
bullshit --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Gives examples of smear web sites and makes fun of them. Does not use bias, but makes fun of political stereotypes. Plus it is a stub, and needs ICU not VFD. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 19:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
ICU is not allowed for articles this old. Famine left an edit summary with "...I debate deleting this unfunny and unoriginal page too." --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 19:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
That just means it was nominated for VFD before, and it was voted to be kept. Otherwise it would have been deleted. Nominating it for VFD twice is double jeopardy. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 22:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Yeah, uh no. Not even a good one liner--Headofred 02:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Oh, I get it. He's really, really gay. That's hilari...no, that's not. Someone put a lot of work into this. Too bad they didn't evolve past "teh ghey" humour. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Moo, er, I mean weak keep. -- HindleyiteConverse 18:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Why are people putting stubs on VFD when ICU is needed instead? --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 19:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Because it's more than a week old. Much more than a week old. I've gotten into enough trouble before for ICUing old pages. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Need some improvements, maybe just a few images and the final quote, which is obvious and frustrating. -- herrdoktorneedsAscalpel[scream!] 19:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Edited the two last quotes. Maybe the intro also needs reworking. An image is also in need to make this look less like a chain mail. -- herrdoktorneedsAscalpel[scream!] 19:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Plus two pics and a different finish by Strange But Untrue. Go take a look. -- herrdoktorneedsAscalpel[scream!] 19:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I added a pic/caption. I have no idea if it makes any sense as I just woke up and I bashed my head on the endtable. Also, there's a little blood coming out of my ears. I'm pretty sure that's a good sign. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 20:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Red links are my only concern, including this Recent feature.. I'd prefer a rewrite, but I don't really know how I'd spin it.. --THINKER 04:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
It's just not funny. I can't find any good jokes in the entire article. The guy can barely speak english for christ's sakes! --Jake4d1 16:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete: Why, yes, the French surrendered in a war a while back. How very apt of you to bring up the only thing you remember from your high school world history class! Now, come up with a new joke next time. Or at least a good one. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 08:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to 2005cruftopedia, the crappy encyclopedia that anyone can shit on. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 12:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Like so much 'shock humour', it's not shocking at all, just sad and predictable. --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 03:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Tasteless victim-blaming. On a touchy subject, allegations of racism are not needed. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 04:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
It might be useless to note, but I'm noming this for 3 reasons, none of which involve offense over the subject matter: 1. Its rambling and unfunny, muddles up its own punchline, and is a generally poor satire 2. Its short. 3. The picture isn't funny. See this to refresh yourself on everyone's opinion of the issue so this doesn't have to get like that one, then disregard and copy it's bickering. --THINKER 02:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
It is a bad stub. It sucks. It is not funny, has spelling and grammar mistakes all over, and is very short. Delete. MarshalUncyclopedian!Talk to me! 02:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
here at 2005cruft industries, we produce as much 2005cruft as we can to fill your wiki up to the top with garbage so that only quality articles make up 10% of the content. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello? We here at Huffing Industries would be more than happy to take that 2005cruft off your wiki for the price of a few Delete votes. Thank you. —–Sir Hv»|Talk|Contribs|KUN|UotM|RotM|VFH|Kidney|22/04 20:06
Delete Apparently being in a series doesn't excuse crud. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 20:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Nom and Against Deserves a better approach, not encyclopedic etc. Delete it and I'll start rewriting.—The preceding unsigned comment was added byMadretsma (talk • contribs)
Starnes redirected this to Pamela Anderson, but some douche removed the redirect. The redirect is back now, so yeah. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong keep An established joke with strong progression (click the links). Shortness is excused because it's parodying the site message. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 21:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Should be gone now Matt lobster 21:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Oh, the humanity! Why in hell do people find The A-Team so funny? That they have to make crappy parodies like this? Incidentally, it is parody in name only, and rather quickly descends into a direct violation of the BFANJS policy.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 00:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I am quite likely to pity the fool who makes a shitty parody of the A-team. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - appears someone has no sense of humor and should go join wikipedia. I have no idea where this person is comming from, but this is uncyclopedia, not some childish "lets go delete other peple's work in progress" —The preceding unsigned comment was added byDascootagangsta (talk • contribs)
Put a {{construction}} template on it and we'll remove the VFD. We may still delete it later though. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep It is tagged under construction. Give it a big rewrite, and use some grammar. It's a mess to read. Remove the non-related pics, and stick to the topic. If it gets a rewrite and still sucks, I'm putting it back in here myself. --Videshi 04:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - appears to be a vanity site created by the group themself. They mention wikipedia thinking they were nonsense. I tend to agree with wikipedia on this one. Figured it was too long for QVFD. Also its riddled with poor spelling and abysmal grammar. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.003:33, 24 April 2007
Delete - has been worked on a bit more, but still no good. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Now construction tagged. I suggest we remove this now. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Although there is good material within the boundaries of comedy, this article does need a little help. Its still superior to many other articles out there. I will agree to rewrite its entirely. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byDascootagangsta (talk • contribs)
Sorry. Construction wont save it imo. It not a case of needing more work, it needs a new topic entirely. There is a big difference between a funny article about something we all know about, and vanity crap. I'm not trying to rain on your parade, but just because wikipedia didn't like it doesn't mean we will. Also, repeatedly removing the VFD tag and putting it on my sub-user page doesn't do your case any favours. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.004:12, 24 April 2007
I give up, if they can somehow rewrite it to not be vanity shite then go for it. I'll be waiting with baited breath. I won't remove my vote however. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.004:46, 24 April 2007
Weak Delete or revert? the original is meh, but this is the final solution. Leatherboundbooks 01:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff - When in doubt.. THROW IT OUT!! Capercorn 03:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
i remember the tv series, it was a pretty dull tv series, the books were worse. this article is probably even more boring than all of those, and should probably be carried by scholastic since they only carry crap --» >UF|TLK|▋» 05:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Very little that isn't adult. Delete --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 06:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
recreated for the third time. same content, still a pile of shit fucked out of an ass. doctor's recommendation: kill and cvp to prevent it from coming back --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff - It was made by some fanboy who lives in his mothers basement, and was pathetic enough to put a link to a pr0n site. It needs to die. Capercorn 03:43, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff - Im tired of all the racist cunts on this website. Capercorn 03:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Get it out of my sight! We should not be soft on blatant attacks on people in any culture. This is a disgrace to Uncyclopedia and should be slaughtered. Ikabu 04:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff Racist, not distinguishably sarcastic. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 07:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Destroy. Reminds me of Richards' "nigger" joke. Just. Not. Funny. --Medvedev(scream) 11:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete A big racist spot on the nose of Uncyclopedia. To be fair I can see that maybe it is supposed to be satire, but it's just not well enough written. It's pathetic. Matt lobster 11:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I am quite frankly ashamed of myself for not nominating this when I saw it before. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 12:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
No, just no --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Is it satire? And if so, is the satire evident enough to adequately distinguish it from racism?Rogpyvbc 01:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
It isn't satire, it's just plain racist.
I never really understood it myself, hence my lack of vote, but if it gets huffed can an admin move a copy under Mowgli's userpage? There's a good story behind this page, but for the life of me I can't remember what it is. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Isn't Mowgli an Asian Male himself? In which case I can't see how this can be classed as rascist. Ironic perhaps? Satire, maybe? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
He may not have meant it to be racist - just like Richards - but that's what it came out like.--Medvedev(scream) 12:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
What's with this copying to user pages when stuff gets deleted? If it gets deleted then there shouldn't be copies that can come back again otherwise this is a complete waste of everybody's time. Matt lobster 11:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me if I get the details wrong, but Mowgli made this as a joke for another user (Col.swordman?). As an in-joke it was left under his userpage, but it got moved out to mainspace after it mysteriously appeared on VFH (where comments about it were about the same as the ones that are appearing here). --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 16:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Don't the Romanians have enough problems without have crap like this written about them??? Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 22:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
