*'''Delete''' NOW, it is pure pollution, this topic deserves better. [[User:Madretsma|Madretsma]] 23:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' NOW, it is pure pollution, this topic deserves better. [[User:Madretsma|Madretsma]] 23:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''Delete''' I'd say rewrite, but it is in too bad of a condition to be saved without starting fresh. [[User:Jedibob5|Jedibob5]] 22:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC) [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion&diff=prev&oldid=1840297 diff]
+
*'''Delete''' I'd say rewrite, but it is in too bad of a condition to be saved without starting fresh. [[User:Jedibob5|Jedibob5]] 22:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC) [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion&diff=prev&oldid=1840297 diff]
*'''Delete''' I'm not happy with users wearing that pic out either, it's funny but it can't save every page. [[User:Quadzilla99|Quadzilla99]] 23:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I'm not happy with users wearing that pic out either, it's funny but it can't save every page. [[User:Quadzilla99|Quadzilla99]] 23:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' {{User:Cs1987/sig}} 04:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' {{User:Cs1987/sig}} 04:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Line 427:
Line 427:
*'''Keep''' {{User:Braydie/sig2}} <small>18:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' {{User:Braydie/sig2}} <small>18:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' I've done some more thinking. It's funny, so I change my vote to keep. Despite the fact that everytime I see that man's face it enrages me. [[User:Kip the Dip|Kip the Dip]] 19:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I've done some more thinking. It's funny, so I change my vote to keep. Despite the fact that everytime I see that man's face it enrages me. [[User:Kip the Dip|Kip the Dip]] 19:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
−
*'''Keep''' This article is funny and less ofending than all the stuff about holocaust and so on. So why it should be delated? Because it offends Americans? http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Jedrus07
+
*'''Keep''' This article is funny and less ofending than all the stuff about holocaust and so on. So why it should be delated? Because it offends Americans? http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:Jedrus07
*'''Keep''' -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}} 20:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' -- {{User:Mhaille/sig}} 20:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''FEATURE''' because not only does it have little to do with the incident itself, it has much to do with what could've been. Also per Strange but Untrue. --{{User:Kalir/sig}} 19:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''FEATURE''' because not only does it have little to do with the incident itself, it has much to do with what could've been. Also per Strange but Untrue. --{{User:Kalir/sig}} 19:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Line 485:
Line 485:
:::::It's my own annoyance rather than hatred... it got a VFD because Mhaille restored it after Hinoa deleted it on sight... and can I reiterate; why is it you Americans find it perfectly acceptable to mock Middle East terrorism... yet homeland violence is totally out of bounds, rather hypocritical to be frank... not to mention I specifically made sure NOT to mock the deceased --[[User:Olipro|Olipro]] <font size="-2">[[Image:Icons-flag-gb.png]] [[UnNews:UnNewsAudio|Anchor]] [[Uncyclopedia:Admin_Rank|KUN]] ([[User_talk:Olipro|Harass]])</font> 01:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
:::::It's my own annoyance rather than hatred... it got a VFD because Mhaille restored it after Hinoa deleted it on sight... and can I reiterate; why is it you Americans find it perfectly acceptable to mock Middle East terrorism... yet homeland violence is totally out of bounds, rather hypocritical to be frank... not to mention I specifically made sure NOT to mock the deceased --[[User:Olipro|Olipro]] <font size="-2">[[Image:Icons-flag-gb.png]] [[UnNews:UnNewsAudio|Anchor]] [[Uncyclopedia:Admin_Rank|KUN]] ([[User_talk:Olipro|Harass]])</font> 01:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
*Why too soon? To laugh about bad things that happen to real people or even fictional charachters, you need at least a minimal level of detachment from them, otherways it's not funny, it's just hurtful and sad. This article looks like the kind of article that could make me if not laugh at least smile from the witty staire, but not just yet.--{{User:Rataube/sig}} 18:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*Why too soon? To laugh about bad things that happen to real people or even fictional charachters, you need at least a minimal level of detachment from them, otherways it's not funny, it's just hurtful and sad. This article looks like the kind of article that could make me if not laugh at least smile from the witty staire, but not just yet.--{{User:Rataube/sig}} 18:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
−
*Meh, didn't care for it, doesn't need to be deleted, but still, meh.{{unsigned|Madretsma}} [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia%3AVotes_for_deletion&diff=1839808&oldid=1839733 dif]
+
*Meh, didn't care for it, doesn't need to be deleted, but still, meh.{{unsigned|Madretsma}} [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia%3AVotes_for_deletion&diff=1839808&oldid=1839733 dif]
*It's pretty stupid to keep a bad article just because you want to prove a point. Deleting it out of censorship is just silly. I don't quite see how a particular kind of news story should garner special attention, to be deleted because it's deemed offensive, or to be kept because it's a political statement against censorship. The obvious solution is to make a better article. I think the point of this whole site is to collaborate to make things better, not bitch in a vote that will '''clearly''' go nowhere. ([[User:Gir.|Gir.]] 03:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC))
*It's pretty stupid to keep a bad article just because you want to prove a point. Deleting it out of censorship is just silly. I don't quite see how a particular kind of news story should garner special attention, to be deleted because it's deemed offensive, or to be kept because it's a political statement against censorship. The obvious solution is to make a better article. I think the point of this whole site is to collaborate to make things better, not bitch in a vote that will '''clearly''' go nowhere. ([[User:Gir.|Gir.]] 03:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC))
::[[User:Gir.|Gir]] Your so right, spot on. Keep this arctical and REwrite it. It's a great idea for a UnNews story.--[[User:That Guy Huffed Me|→☃☭Mr.Huffy☭☃←]] 09:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
::[[User:Gir.|Gir]] Your so right, spot on. Keep this arctical and REwrite it. It's a great idea for a UnNews story.--[[User:That Guy Huffed Me|→☃☭Mr.Huffy☭☃←]] 09:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Latest revision as of 01:04, April 27, 2011
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
Keep and split - however, we definitely need more material for the football club. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep the part about the Illiac warriors Ajax and Mr. Clean. And the pic is great. A separate article for the footy club would be appropriate. ----OEJ 16:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep and expand The idea's great, but the concept is great. With a bit of work, it could be a good article. --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 05:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep & expand. —Gnome …MUNF@H 20:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep and fix. If one clears out the crap, there is a good foundation to build upon. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 21:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
the word that best describes this starts with "2" and ends in "005cruft". --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I'm just nomming this, you people can choose about this poor article's faith. Let's split it up and rewrite it. One article the ancient hero/soap dude, the other the football club. Madretsma 23:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I am right now writing the article about Ajax, I invite anybody to contrib', you can find it under Ajax (soccer), i'll post a whoops on ajax. Madretsma 15:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Nuke it I went back through the article history and its just become progressivly worse with time. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 21:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete -- quite bad. The article's structure is weak and its premise unpleasant and not in the least humorous or satirical.----OEJ 22:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep I laughed a little, so why not. It does need much clean up though, which I doubt it'll get, so I won't be too broken up when its gone.. --THINKER 17:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete for its unfunny sexual content. IP user removed ICU tag. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 05:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
normally i'd say to put the icu tag back on but annoying users who persist to keep a stupid page without improving its content deserve to have their page deleted --» >UF|TLK|▋» 05:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
2005cruft. belched into existance in october 05, sat around for a good part of 2006 and was vandalized in march of this year. so i say kill it --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
leik omg dis mmorpg iz crap nd so is teh artcle about it!!!11!!!one!!!1!! —Another PongoFlameSandbox☭ 08:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Look, If it's Ok, I'll move the article to my User page (I wrote it after all), expand and make it better, and then put it back under it's current name.04:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
That sounds like a good compromise to me.. --THINKER 17:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. and I got a bullet instead of a number, too —Gnome …MUNF@H 20:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Holly irshsit --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete: Dense and unstructured to the point of unreadability. Might be funny to one of the two people proficient in Linux IRC programming. That is a very small audience. ----OEJ 22:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
I guess there's alot of 2006cruft, too --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Could be a funny premise but the article as it stands is short, listy, and badly written -- sort of a nod in the direction of an article. ----OEJ 22:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep It's already an established in-(anti)joke. Anyway, have you checked the "Find out more" button? It's kinda funny. I have a feeling there are gonna be a hell of a lot of keeps. —A. N. Otherpongo (Parp!/SB/Grueslayer/VFD/☭/»Free iPod!) 08:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Euroipods is an institution. Too many articles depend upon its existence. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 08:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong keep Too famous an article to be deleted. Randomator 10:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep and then let us never speak of it again. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 12:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep this is an institution. ~ 11:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep, although I certainly wanted to keep Contents for the same reason. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
a vote giving away free article keeps in return for a) money b) reffering membesr to do the same --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Nick Drake rocks, or at least he did. Then he died. Probably a good thing too. Anyhoo, I've cleaned it up a bit now, and will continue to do so if it gets to live a little longer. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Strong Keep per Mhaille - please don't delete this until you see where it goes. And I'm sure you don't want to piss Mhaille off. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually, it isn't that random. If you didn't realise it, this is based on the popular album "Pink Moon" by Nick Drake, except that it obviously isn't about the album. I reckon this article should exist, but not in this state. I would rewrite it if I knew anything about Nick Drake... SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
He can take out a platoon of giant robots, but he'll have to take out an admin with a huffinator (an impossible task). Delete —Another PongoFlameSandbox☭ 09:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Okay, really. What is bandcruft? Jedibob5 22:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
cruft with the subject relating to a musical group or person --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep and rewrite. Pijo is defined at BBC-Languages as "A posh, stuck-up person. This easily identifiable social group tend to dress in labels, have lots of money and speak in a very particular way. It can also be used as an adjective to indicate that something or somewhere is posh." The article to hand appears to be an attempt at actual social satire. It needs work, though. ----OEJ 16:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Keep- Can be used in a number or articles to come to mind, the loadings a bit long, so i would have this as a bottem page .GIF. However, it needs a name change. How do we go about doing that?--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 21:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Save and re upload? —Braydie 17:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep There are number of articles that this could go, but it deserves and article around it. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 00:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep But if there's some way to reduce the file size, I say we do that, --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 05:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
snowball fiiiiiiiiiight! err, delete this --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Come on -- there's worse than this going around. "A fuel tank as big as Staten Island" is priceless -- Sir Armando PerentieKUNFP 11:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - This was huffed 2 years ago and it's still crap today. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
WTF? I assumed it would actually be about the album Autofellatio, but this is just weird. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 09:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
stop it with the fucking blowjob jokes already, it was funny the first time --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Unfunny sexcruft. A recreated VFD with an expired fix tag. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 19:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
NN spam, sexcruft, a bit of pedo nonsense thrown in. Huff --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 19:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
while there is 2006cruft out there we should be focusing more on the 2005cruft. however, this sucks too much to live --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Not fantasy: see the PeeJ website and this article, for instance; and of course the Wickedpedia article on PeeJ. This is a very appropriate target for satirical exploration: are slimy vigilante entrapment and smear tactics justified if they target even slimier paedophiles? But the article is not well-written. ----OEJ 16:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep I thought it was pretty funny. Kip the Dip 20:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. The Kinsey scale is well done, if you're familiar with it. I don't find the article heterosexist. Rogpyvbc 05:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Opposite of Modus's comment - I like most of the lines but there's the odd one that's a bit rubbish. Not the most typical gay joke out there, and I've heard a few... -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 19:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
An interesting idea, with a line or two that isn't entirely without merit, hampered by...everything else. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
gay joke number 3,000,000. see htbfanjs --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
The Kinsey scale bit is a good idea...for Kinsey scale. The rest is about how gay things are. Which is funny if you're gay. (See how not funny that joke is?) --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand how a number becomes gay. I would vote "delete", but I don't think it's fair to vote delete on an article that I just don't "get". -- The Turd From The Golden StateWEST END MASSIVETalk to me SLAVE!! 16:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. I remember the day after Oklahoma the talking head on the news was saying how they had a description of the suspects...swarthy skinned, mid-east accents, etc. Timothy McVeigh was whiter than me, and I'm practically transparent. This story fits, too well, but it fits. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
STRONG KEEP. Censorship is not going to make the situation go away. We have to confront our problems head on.
Keep. Definately some redeeming value here, even if just for the main idea of "all terrorists are Muslims". I agree with Asteroid that the picture is unneeded, unless the caption is improved or the picture itelf is replaced/shopped to something funnier. Either way, I've never seen 'too soon' being an issue on Uncyclopedia; I'd hate to see it be one now. I'm imagining that's the bulk of the argument for deletion, and it shouldn't be. Tobz1000 18:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Because we spend half our time offending most of the population of everywhere, and the things that we say about more minor countries are far more offensive to them than this is to Americans. This news article is comparatively gentle compared to what could have been said, and it's got its share of funny, if in an uncomfortable way. Having said that, we could remove the picture from the top of the news feed, since it's a bit incongruous with the donation banner... oh, you have - okay then. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 18:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep I've done some more thinking. It's funny, so I change my vote to keep. Despite the fact that everytime I see that man's face it enrages me. Kip the Dip 19:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep This article is funny and less ofending than all the stuff about holocaust and so on. So why it should be delated? Because it offends Americans? http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:Jedrus07
FEATURE because not only does it have little to do with the incident itself, it has much to do with what could've been. Also per Strange but Untrue. --•"Spang"•contribs | talk• 19:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Without satire, the terrorists win. You don't support terrorism...do you? -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Mhaille and Rangeley said it on the talk page -- sannse (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
FEATURE!!!!!!!!!! If we are not allowed to make controversial statements, we have surrendered to the "nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." Please, for the sake of liberal Western democracy, keep this up. Self-censorship is nothing but voluntary slavery. It's gentle compared to many of our other articles, and satire must not allow itself to devolve to base stupidities for fear of being "too early." Interestingly, it is never "too early" when thousands are killed in Darfur or Iraq. This is nowhere near as offensive as our other stuff; it is only a controversy because it satirizes America. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) -KUNSEXYWH21:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep KEEP! biting satire is what we are about surely? nothing is sacred, if you don't find it funny then you should be shot. smashmybrothersfacein 22:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep it is funny--Slogan - (T/C/med) 21:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Sick, twisted, and droll... it's penultimate UnNews. Rev. Zim (Talk)Get saved! 22:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Not to say it doesn't need a bit of work, but still a funny piece. Does the author really sound like he's mocking the incident? I'd be more inclined to vote for deletion if it were on the grounds that Un could get by on the eight million governmentally-critical articles it already has written.. --THINKER 22:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep In order to heal, we must learn to laugh so we can get over the pain and suffering that Cho caused. Instead of a VFD this should have had an ICU tag on it. It could have been written better. --Lt.SirOrion Blastar (talk) 00:13, 20 April
Keep Its satire, and restrained at that. The fact is, the shooting happened. And I am willing to bet that a good number of people thought that the shooter was a Muslim, including our half-wit President. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 00:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep Obviously I've been one of the people here who has been very zero tolerance on being insensitive about the VT tragedy. This, however, doesn't mock the tragedy itself but rather satirizes the concept of racial profiling. It's not a great article by any means, and it still feels too soon, but I wouldn't delete it. --» Sir SavethemoosesGrandCommandingOfficer ... holla atcha boy» 01:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Now, as much as this article may be "too soon" or "offensive" (which it is - and how), we should only delete on the grounds of unsaveable crap. This is average quality, but not VFDable. We certainly shouldn't delete this just because it is offensive. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 02:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. "Too soon?" It's parodying the American people's racist views, not the 32 people that died, and not the person that killed them. I don't see why this is "too soon." t o m p k i n s blah.ﺞوﻦוףהՃՄண்ஸފއހวอฏม+տtrade websites 02:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong keep. We must hold to our principals and make it ok to satirize every innocent murdered if we'll satirize anyone innocent murdered. However, I'd like to delete the picture of the villain, which I explained in the talkpage.--<<>> 02:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I WANT THIS MOTHERFUCKINGARTICLE TO STAY ON THIS MOTHERFUCKING SITE there isnt much more to say Weasel3689 04:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I only wish I'd thought of the Muslim angle when writing my article on this tasteful topic - David Gerard 08:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Uncyclopedia has been cracking jokes about tragedies like this all the time. Why should we make an exception for something just because it happened in the United States and not in a random third world country Americans don't know about? Kumiankka 09:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep The concept of it is hilarious, needs a rewrite however. I believe the points for keeping it from being deleted have been made by other users, and I completely agree with them. As for saying that it is offensive; no its not, it doesn't poke fun at the victims and the only people who say that is should be deleted are dirty, pro-PC, uber-liberal, baffoons who deserve to be deleted themselves. -- The Turd From The Golden StateWEST END MASSIVETalk to me SLAVE!! 16:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep 1000 dead in Iraq, 30000 dead per year from gun crime in USA, link them together and you get this very witty entry. (that fooled someone I know)--Darwin of suburbia 17:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep simply because I don't like things being censored just because it's "too soon". An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays 21:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep per Olipro. The article is fairly decent, and UnNews doesn't have as high standards as main article space anyway. It is no less appropriate to joke about deaths in the USA than about those anywhere else. Definitely remove the "old guy" phrase and the picture though. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 21:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment"...UnNews doesn't have as high standards as main article space anyway". As an UnNews guy...ouch. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment Drat, I knew that would earn me some ire. I had in mind this sentence from Uncyclopedia:How To Get Started Editing: "generally UnNews pieces are allowed to be shorter than Uncyclopedia articles." That's all. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 22:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep--I understand the joke it's making fun of Islamophobia and who the media seems to assume that this is a terrorist attack carried out by some Arab guy because he thinks Americans have sinned it's not offensive to people who died it's making fun of the way how our media handles a situation like this.--Scott 00:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep while it does seem a bit soon. It doesn't disrespect the dead. Nor is it in poor taste. --Kenvalyi 02:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep If thirty two people had been shot dead in any other country, we wouldn't think twice about whether it was in good taste. --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 05:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Nomination and delete Not only is it far too soon after the VA Tech shootings for this article to be up, but it just isn't that funny. I'd also like to note that we've had a discussion on the talk page over this article, and that I've already deleted it once (Mhaille restored). —MajorSirHinoaprepare for trouble • make it double? 17:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
*Too soon, really. And if not, at least take the picture of the murderer from the front page, that certainly adds no comic value to the site. ---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 17:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC). Changed my mind.
Delete It didn't offend me, it just sucked. Toss it. SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 19:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
What's that? Up in the sky? It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's a flying delete vote!!!!!!!!!!!! Not funny yet. If you were gunned down by some crazy dude, would you want a page about it here? In a while, it might be somewhat close to comedic. Stars+stripes 20:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete Not only wasn't the article funny, but I know quite a few people from VA tech, and it's just too soon to even joke about it. Try in a few years.--Skyl3lazer 21:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
A few YEARS?! Are you mad? In a few years, nobody will even care enough to render it amusing! --•"Spang"•contribs | talk• 23:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete It's not the fact that this doesn't amek good poitns but it's just too sooon to be realising something. Just horrible timing and bad taste. This would be like making fun of the kids at Columbine the day after it happened. People have lost they're children not in the least bit appropriate for right now.--Gaberou 21:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete. Too, soon. Article about a gunman that claimed thirty plus fatalities are saddening, not funny. Think about. YOU were shot and killed by the shooter, and Uncyclopedia makes JOKES about your killer? This article is sickening. Give this article Death, Pestilence, War, and Famine. ---Han Solo(Flame)< 22:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete Too soon and also not funny in the least. Quadzilla99 23:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete Not a time to be making jokes in the event of this horrifying tragedy. Gryffon 00:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Hinoa's right, it's not that funny. In fact, it's not funny at all. Satire, of the biting social variety. We do still have room for that here, don't we? If not, about one fifth of my stuff (including a couple of features) should go VFD as well. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Just because YOU don't find it funny does NOT mean everyone else shares in your goddamn opinions... I'm only ashamed you felt you had the right to instantly delete it rather than take it here in the first place --OliproAnchorKUN (Harass) 22:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Whoa! Step away from the anger. Hinoa did the right thing - we're talking about this aren't we? And all of us are letting our opinions be known. Don't let Cho's hatred spread here, too. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 00:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
It's my own annoyance rather than hatred... it got a VFD because Mhaille restored it after Hinoa deleted it on sight... and can I reiterate; why is it you Americans find it perfectly acceptable to mock Middle East terrorism... yet homeland violence is totally out of bounds, rather hypocritical to be frank... not to mention I specifically made sure NOT to mock the deceased --OliproAnchorKUN (Harass) 01:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Why too soon? To laugh about bad things that happen to real people or even fictional charachters, you need at least a minimal level of detachment from them, otherways it's not funny, it's just hurtful and sad. This article looks like the kind of article that could make me if not laugh at least smile from the witty staire, but not just yet.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Meh, didn't care for it, doesn't need to be deleted, but still, meh.—The preceding unsigned comment was added byMadretsma (talk • contribs) dif
It's pretty stupid to keep a bad article just because you want to prove a point. Deleting it out of censorship is just silly. I don't quite see how a particular kind of news story should garner special attention, to be deleted because it's deemed offensive, or to be kept because it's a political statement against censorship. The obvious solution is to make a better article. I think the point of this whole site is to collaborate to make things better, not bitch in a vote that will clearly go nowhere. (Gir. 03:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC))
Gir Your so right, spot on. Keep this arctical and REwrite it. It's a great idea for a UnNews story.--→☃☭Mr.Huffy☭☃← 09:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
It doesn't need a rewrite, IMO, just some tweaks. It got caught, huffed, unhuffed and protected so quickly that no one had a chance to make it all shiny. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 17:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
for the billionth time, there was no such thing as QVFD in 2005. not that it excuses this piece of tripe though --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Terminate it. Immediately.Jedibob5 12:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Actually, QVFD was invented in mid 2005. I checked the archives, and this was listed in QVFD but somehow didn't get deleted. This gives me an idea... (check the old QVFD archives for more 2005cruft). SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff Short, with only one good line. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 21:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
"This is Peak FM, broadcasting live from North Derbyshire, telling you listeners that we are soon going to be huffed. Now, here are more great hits!" —Another PongoFlameSandbox☭ 19:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
push off a cliff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
It's short. There are a few so-so directions to take the title in, but none resemble this. Axe --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 08:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
more 2005cruft, hopefully we can shovel all the 2005cruft out to take care of the 2006cruft but that'll take too long --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Huff - It needs to die. --Capercorn 20:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete What is this? It appears to me to be utter nonsense. Jedibob5 22:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Note to Madretsma - if you find yourself banned for a day for adding too much stuff to VFD, don't be surprised. Just don't do it again. Keep to the 15 article limit. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 04:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete I bet you 100 pounds of Sex this will die!--→☃☭Mr.Huffy☭☃← 08:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
2005crufttastic!--» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
too new to be VFD'd, was created yesterday. and to think that even the admins don't follow the rules of ICU... --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
and I have added ICU to the page --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
2005cruft, with a faintly funny idea, but too short. Tagged for expansion for over a month with no improvement. Delete --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 20:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete if it's been idle that long. --T.K.F. 21:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm... FYI, it does say what it's based on in the link at the bottom. I'll vote later. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 19:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep. I thought it was pretty good... does that make me a bad person? --T.K.F. 00:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Knee-jerk Keep because someone mentioned the words "in bad taste" as a reason for deletion. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Perfect example of trivializing horrific events. Keep --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 01:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Why delete? Ethereal 14:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Its okay --Redribbbon 19:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
A trivial example of perfectly horrifying events. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 20:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Hurtful and in very bad taste, not funny Madretsma 00:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Meta-humour which we should all agree to disagree about and leave alone. I'm sure it's been VFDed before in the not too distant past, only I can't find it in the WhatLinks because of Insineratehim's signature. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 18:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep as self-reference with a small cultural element. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 22:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - FU SPANG. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep at the risk of infuriating Spang. How... dadaist. ish. sorta. --ContestantCUN--VFHNotMBuzzCtrbs 23:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - what is Uncyclopedia with teh Contents? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 00:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep This isn't about the article, this is between me and Spang. You're going down. —Braydie 23:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Look at the amount of AAAAAAAAA! clones we've spared. Look at Euroipods]. Look at fisher price. Why not spare this article? If this article isn't spared, why should those other redundant articles be spared? --~
Keep FU SPANG. --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Dkeep- Goddamned spang, i h8 you so fucking much, let's vote the exact opposite of spang from now on, goddamned spang. Madretsma 22:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete
I hate this article with all my heart. I wish it was deleted and bashed up and mashed to pieces and burned and raped and had all it's guts ripped out and... You get the picture.Against.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!!EAT ME!!!!CRAZY PERSON!SMELLY!!!ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 02:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Contents contents contents contents contents contents contents. Hahaha, I'm so funny! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. We already had an AAAAAAAAA! and all it's little clones. Be real: this "article" takes 0.15 seconds to scan and then you're looking for the random page link. ----OEJ 03:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Instead of mentioning it on IRC (which started that little flamewar on the talk page), I should have submitted it here in silence.... —Gnome …MUNF@H 16:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Delete if my article CRAP was deleted because it wasn't funny, then this needs to o too. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 22:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't know, I don't think the articles funny but because Contents means, err, contents then it should be like...ehh. What I know is that seeing a single word repeated 156 times (like PENIS) doesn't strike me as funny. It strikes me as "Why did someone take the time to type (word) 156 times instead of writing an article."--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 02:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep Almost a good nomination really. It is totally pointless, but then that's the point. Totally. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 00:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, FFS (Fight For Stoning?) is like the opposite of Wikipedia:WP:TEA. Is that what we really want? --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 01:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
