Waffled --Rcmurphy KUN 22:13, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

What are 5 year olds doing on Unc.? --Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 11:43, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Deaded --Rcmurphy KUN 22:13, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Somebody delete this dreadful fact-filled article, pronto! I thought we had "standards" here... --DWIII 10:32, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

This is QVFD hence huffed on sight, I also suspect that it's creation is in someway related to the QVFD'd Skyscraperpage (which was basicaly an ad for a website lacking in all humour) as the IP's are on the same subnet. --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 11:08, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
This has piqued my interest. Is there any chance of putting it on TFAODP?
It really isn't worth it, it's availbe here if you want (yep straight cut and paste job)--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 11:56, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Although I did like the fact theat the wikipedia page started with a quote..... --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 11:56, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Pop Off

Popped --Rcmurphy KUN 22:13, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

QVFD since 2/7. Time to pop off?

Delete With DVR, we don't have to watch crap like this. --Famine 14:33, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete --Nytrospawn 16:10, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Poop on??? Flush.
--Carlb 15:46, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Monkey sez keep.--47Monkey 04:55, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
It didn't stop baby Jesus's crying.--blargh 05:52, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Or did it?--47Monkey 05:54, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)


HULK SMASHED --Rcmurphy KUN 22:13, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Bin in QVFD since 8/7. Time to Banner huff it?

Yes --Famine 14:25, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Dump this
along with the green radioactive ooze that created it. Just a fragment. We really need a one-joke minimum for articles around here... --Carlb 15:46, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Monkey likes. Keep. --47Monkey 04:55, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy KUN 22:06, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

The Hvscene

Currently a blank page. A couple of articles in it's history, one clearly vanity, and the other about "Mike Gottlieb". -- 11:21, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I've reverted back to the vanity page for now, so that the page can judged on those merits. --IMBJR 12:16, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Dunno why you did that. We don't do vanity pages here. There is but one judgement, and I shall render it upon saving this page....DELETED --Famine 14:40, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I shall slap myself thricely. --IMBJR 14:59, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Bryn Terfel

Put to sleep. --IMBJR 21
13, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Was placed in QVFD --IMBJR 11:18, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

The people have a right to free hot-dogs?! Can you deny that?! !?! ?!?! --47 Monkeys 13:57, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Actually, on second thought I agree. Delete away! --47 Monkeys 00:04, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Not funny. --blargh 04:59, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Smacked --Rcmurphy KUN 22:13, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite and MTU (move to ick!tionary) --Carlb 18:18, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

What ^^^^^^^ said --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy CUN 21:08, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete (BORING!). --DWIII 03:10, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Move to MTU. Or Delete. Delete. --47Monkey 04:55, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Too factual.--blargh 06:32, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Unfunny.--Eleutheria 07:42, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Chuck Taylors

Whacked --Rcmurphy KUN 22:13, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Another two or three-line fragment, not enough here to even be the foundation for a proper article. --Carlb 15:46, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)


BORING Delete--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 19:02, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Two lines do not an article make. --Carlb 15:46, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
--blargh 05:33, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete is no-one wants to expand.--47Monkey 05:39, 9 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Huffed --Rcmurphy KUN 22:01, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Seems like another vanity page to me. --ERTW 00:27, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Not to mention Sir User:Elvis CUN and Sir User:Elvis KUN - good gravy, man, get a Livejournal or something. --Rcmurphy CUN 00:35, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Not Funny, appears that no effort has go into this page.--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 08:02, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Move to ED:Main Page, as that's the usual dumping ground for vanity pages about individual LiveJournal users. --Carlb 17:11, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion

Redirected to TBD --Rcmurphy KUN 22:01, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Completely unfunny. Who thought of this &@#^? I say Delete it. --Savethemooses 00:09, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I vote to delete the vote to delete the Pages for Deletion page. --Spintherism 02:39, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

If I was able to delete the vote to delete the Pages for Deletion page, I would do so. Unfortinately, it seems to have block-compressed revisions. Redirecting to TBD... --Famine 04:41, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Gandalf the Grand Dragon, Colonel Smoker, and Teabag everything that moves

Gandalf and Colonel whacked, Teabizzle kept. --Rcmurphy KUN 22:01, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

All by the same user, and marginally linked, these are fairly bad. I tried to fix Gandalf, but I don't believe it's redeemable. Nor are the rest. However, the Gandalf article me mad laugh just enough that I decided to VFD them instead of insta-whacking all three. --Famine 23:55, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Gandalf and Colonel Smoker. I think the teabag one has a bit more potential , though. -- Codeine 00:33, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Eh, to each his own. I would have picked Gandalf as the one with potential. I guess we agree that Colonel Smoker is gone tho. ;) --Famine 02:33, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

What Codeine said --Spintherism 03:36, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I agree with Spintherism in reference to agreeing with Codeine --ERTW 16:51, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Encyclopedic - Delete. I think the author has totally missing the point in the Uncylopedia - he also edited Bangalore putting in actual imformation, but I reverted his edits. --Zilog Jones 22:44, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Send to TFAODP --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 22:59, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
(P.S. New items go to the top)
Delete:This seems to be a fragment/piece of Wikipedia:Chennai but omitting much or most of the original. Doesn't add much if anything original. --Carlb 23:41, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete. We don't need no steeenking reality here. --IMBJR 12:21, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Send it to the true facts and deleted whatevers page.--Nytrospawn 14:44, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Masses spoke out against it, article died. --Famine 14:45, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Sent off to join the choir eternal

Not quite QVFD material. --IMBJR 11:14, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete I was only able to make it slightly less lame (IMHO). It's a tpyo or misspeelign. Just put it out of its misery. --Marcos Malo 18:47, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --DrAwesome 18:49, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete -- ERTW MUN 21:00, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Kill and bury the body under the patio--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 23:03, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Beaten by the Sentinels

:Delete as another boring "so-and-so-is-a-fag" with no actual humour included. Besides, "first all-gay tv channel" actually does exist ( so isn't still waiting to be invented by the X-Men, Antonin Scala (see below) or anyone else. --Carlb 18:55, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

BORING Delete Hate to say it but ed:Old Meme--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 19:02, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy CUN 21:03, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)



Redirect to Uncyclopedia:Administrators --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:32, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Redirect per Elvis --Rcmurphy CUN 21:04, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Killed by Clytaemnestra

Delete --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:33, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete QVFD quality. --Rcmurphy CUN 21:05, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Alph Lundgren

Inneresting factiod: Top Google result for Alph Lundgren is this page. Now Murdererered.

Delete --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy CUN 21:06, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Fecked in the by Sauron

Delete--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy CUN 21:07, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Black Market

Shopped to the rozzers.

Delete--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete I dunno, this might be a serious page. --Rcmurphy CUN 21:10, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Davoud



:Baleet as non-notable vanity-attack page. --Carlb 18:42, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Move to Encyclopedia Dramatica (if they'll have it) --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete I don't think it's even worth moving to ED. --Rcmurphy CUN 21:11, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Comb overs, as in worst ever seen

Combed out

BORING - Delete--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Delete ('tis much too opinionated). --DWIII 02:49, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

UPOV. --Carlb 22:34, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Egyptian pyramids

Pulled down

BORING - Delete--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Cap'n Ben CUN 00:47, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Kai and ChaosHawk

Delete Smells like Teenage Vanity Page. Kill it?--Flammable 05:56, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

You Have Two Dicks

Dicked to death

While this may have some potential, in its current form it is merely a You have two cows copycat that is fairly uninspired and needlessly tasteless. It's also not very funny because it's not a popular meme with an established following.

I don't think Uncyclopedia is a place to push Internet memes, but what do you think? --stillwaters/Talk 08:31, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Weak Keep I initialy thought it was just a standard find and replace but some effort has gone into it, you could also view it as a spoof of a spoof (ala Nonsensepedia) and thus worthy of inclusion.--Elvis 10:27, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Trash the mofo As far as I can see it's a cut n' paste job with the word "dick" substituted for "cow". OK, maybe there's a little more effort gone into it than that, but we've already got You have two cows. Maybe we could donate it to Encyclopedia Dramatica, seems more like their style. -- Codeine 17:31, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

That's cold.-- 19:48, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Look, I don't mean to sound bitter, cynical and mean, but I am, so that's how it comes out. ;) -- Codeine 01:07, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Should have put some sort of emoticon next to that. It wasn't meant as a criticism.-- 10:31, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)
No worries, I didn't think it was intended to be one. -- Codeine 10:39, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Trim and Keep I believe that cutting out the vast numbers of unfunny YHTDs will make it look more like a parody and less like a cheap knock-off. --EvilZak 23:21, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

What ^^^^^ he said (vote changed) --Elvis 23:47, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

It could use to be much, much shorter... --Carlb 00:55, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete I wavered on this - it's a huge page, but I didn't laugh much reading it. While I applaude the massive effort this must have taken, I don't feel it's worth keeping. (With that being said, if someone really has the ambition to smite 90% of the stuff on that page, go ahead, and I may change my mind.) --Famine 23:59, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Sir Rcmurphy CUN 00:00, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Whakao!!?!!

Category:Moblie Cities


It may be a little too soon to prod this one to death, but it does look a little still-born. --IMBJR 21:43, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I'm getting there on it. I just got a little distracted. Edit: Wait. I've only just noticed I spelt "Mobile" wrong while creating that page. Given that, it should definately be deleted. --Turnip 10:29, 7 Aug 2005

The only mobile city which comes to mind is Mobile, Alabama - one city does not a category make. :) --Carlb 15:52, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Even Supremer Court


:Keep. No idea why this has a {{vfd}} tag on it... --Carlb 18:16, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Keep --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:44, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Keep I laughed. Multiple times. That's good enough for me.--DrAwesome 18:55, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

George Bush

Moved and disambigotated.

Keep/redirect. Too many pages link here, most likely looking for George W. Bush? --Carlb 18:16, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Redirect I didn't even realise that it wasn't one already. --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 18:52, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Redirect or Disambiguate for the other George Bushes. --Spintherism 19:20, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Ocean and Oceans


Both are of relatively low quality, at the very least they should be merged and at the very most they should be huffed with extreme prejudice -- ERTW MUN17:05, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

QVFD material
Delete or redirect to Billy Ocean. --Carlb 17:06, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)
What Carldb said Do it, Do it!!! --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 19:03, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Oceans appears to now redirect to Ocean, which has been reverted to an earlier article with the "oceans of the world" template added. --Carlb 19:30, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Redirected to ASCII.

Delete It's just a ASCII picture of a woman.--AlexMW 08:58, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Deletr It's a good picture, but hardly worth an article. The Author should've just put this in his userspace, but I'm not doing it for him.--TheLibrarian 13:22, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete although that is a good picture :p -- ERTW MUN15:14, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

to article on ASCII itself and claim that drawing these pictures on old TTY's is the only known purpose of the American Standard Code for Information Interchange. --Carlb 19:32, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Sunny Delight

Huffed --Sir Rcmurphy CUN 01:41, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete There's just really nothing in it. Just nonsense mumble. --MZL 19:20, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete Not funny. --AlexMW 19:51, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 21:52, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)


Delete Vanity stuff from some computer game tournament clan thing. Here's the Uncyclopedia thread from their forums. There is humor involved on the page, but the question is, does anyone but them find it worthwhile? --Rcmurphy 17:26, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Burniate and dump the ashes in the ocean. Not only is it a vanity page, the writing is terrible. Nonsensical and non-sentence fragments abound. Kill it. --Famine 23:52, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Ultra-Kill The moment I saw "[TC]" I knew it was a clan.Hell,even an admin at that forum wasnt surprised that that guy was banned.--Nytrospawn 00:58, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Burninating the countryside! Burninating the peasants! Burninating 21cw!!!!! --Famine 01:07, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)

PKS Hetman Siepraw

As far as I can tell this is a vanity page for some sort of soccer club.

“Why would anybody put up a vanity page on Uncyclopedia? Shut-up, I'm not talking about my article!”
~ Oscar Wilde on vanity pages
--ERTW 17:59, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Torture it, but in a very quick way. Hooloovoo 18:04, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Delete --TheLibrarian 18:40, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 18:44, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Kicked in the head. --Famine 19:21, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Demystifying Depression navbar

: Delete. Unused. We don't have any corresponding article series by this name. No idea why this is here. --Carlb 16:04, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Added by a 1 month occasional user who hasn't made an edit in 3+ weeks. Not linked to anything. So I whacked it. --Famine 17:15, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)


: Delete. A failed n00b experiment at creating an endless loop of self-including recursive templates. Broken and useless. --Carlb 16:04, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Did you really need to waste the electrons listing these? BALEETED! --Famine 17:19, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Um, how many electrons does it take to say something negative about templates like these? ;) --Carlb 18:43, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

1 Point awarded to Carlb for pointing out logical breakdown in metaphor. --Famine 19:23, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Jason Barnes

Huffed --Rcmurphy 23:34, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Unvanity cruft with a lot to learn about sarcasm. Hooloovoo 19:13, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Ah, another "HE IS TEH GHEY" specimen. One of the Seven Unfunny Humors. --Rcmurphy 19:45, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC) I haven't made the other six up yet.

Disembowel GRAGGHKH NO LIKE. GRAGGHKH SMASH! --Flammable 19:56, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Cheeseboi 20:04, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Burn, piss on ashes, and stir --TheLibrarian 21:36, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I'm new here and even I can tell it's not funny --Bigrich 22:58, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Everything but "It has also been known to destroy Portugal every two years," and stick that somewhere else because it's funny. --Spintherism 23:19, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Never mind, I added that part to Laws of thermodynamics. Go ahead and kill it. --Spintherism 23:24, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Kicked in face --Rcmurphy 23:35, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

What the minky doodle is that about? Hooloovoo 19:08, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

keeps removing the vfd tag. It's getting old fast. Hooloovoo 19:40, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Did it not occur to Mr. that removing VFD tags is frowned upon? I mean, seriously. Uncyclopedia may be chaos, but THERE IS AN ORDER TO THE MADNESS! --Rcmurphy 19:58, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete what a douche--TheLibrarian 21:34, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete subject appears to be non-notable, likely an acquaintance of whomever wrote this mess. --Carlb 22:25, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete (Just adding my vote to lubricate the cogs of inevitable deletion.) --Spintherism 23:15, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Gone --Famine 13:01, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete - it's in spanish (I think) it's all bold, it's not in style, and just seems like complete BS --TheLibrarian 09:39, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Yes, it is BS. It is actually in Romanian and has no connection with Uganda whatsoever. No humour or style either, for that matter. -- 12:49, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Kitten huffing

Not that it's unfunny, more that it's really, really sick. --Cheeseboi 22:24, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Overruled. --PantsMacKenzie 01:00, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Overruled? That should be Overruled, washed, rinsed and hung out to dry. Kitten huffing is a cornerstone of Uncyclopedia. It'd be like removing Oscar, the Stub template, or Mr. T. God, I need me an orange one after this shit... --Famine 01:22, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Kitten Huffing is one of the formative articles of Uncyclopedia. It's been around since mid-February, has the most views of any entry and probably the most links to it as well (outside links and wikilinks alike). If it is deleted the very fabric of Uncyclopedia would unravel. And the underground kitten trade would take a serious hit. (Famine, I wrote this while you were making your edit. The similarities between our comments are rather eerie, no?) --Rcmurphy 01:26, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

You didn't get the other half of batch #1652 did you? Because my last order is definitely missing one of the two boots of the "two boots, three calico, one black, two tan, and two orange". I have to say, I'm a sucker for the variety pack. And it definitly would explain the similarities. Or else, we both must have been here once before. Did I bump into you are the Annual BBQ? --Famine 01:49, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Oops. It's either n00b idiocy or just that I like cats. No harm done, right? --Cheeseboi 19:10, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

At least you were good enough to post here before doing soemthing liek blanking it.--Flammable 05:21, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Um, wouldn't huffing all of the orange ones break the Stub template? --Carlb 23:10, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I thought the Stub template was powered by the souls of orange ones and thus needed more to be huffed than normal ones?--Elvis 05:32, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I believe that is correct. The more we huff, the streatcher the vagina related article becomes. Thus, once again proving the age-old adage, "everything in moderation". --Famine 12:55, 27 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Soap opera

-Garbage--Jondel 05:26, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Rewritten. Now may I wash my hands of this? You may now sing its praises. --Carlb 00:08, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Looks much better!--Jondel 01:23, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Carlb's Pun

Delete. It's shameful, I tell you! Shameful! --Spintherism 17:49, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Rewritten. --Rcmurphy 14:30, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Delete Really stupid. --Cheeseboi 14:11, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

David Hasslehof

Merged. --Carlb 13:15, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Comment. Despite being a duplicate page, the article itself is faily well written. Assuming the main reason for VFD is its misspelled title it might be worth merging to David Hasselhoff. 06:21, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Ski mask


Random nonsense. Delete and next time attempting to type while wearing a ski mask, the eye holes go in the front, OK? --Carlb 13:56, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete --Spintherism 19:01, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete ---Jondel 05:28, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Wooden pale & Directive


*Baleet this unfunny awfulness (both linked from Headquarters only, which itself is flagged for rewrite). --DWIII 03:44, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete And I've started a rewrite of Headquarters, which ought to be rather good once I get around to expanding it and making some pictures and diagrams. --Spintherism 06:19, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete-Not funny, garbage, not amusing.--Jondel 05:31, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Soviet Union

Merged salvageable content of Soviet Russia and Soviet Union to Russian reversal, redirected Soviet Union to USSR, Soviet Russia to Russian reversal. URRSRSS contains little or nothing salvageable. --Carlb 09:28, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete I know, in soviet Russia, article deletes YOU. Fact is, the joke is old, and the manner in which it is presented isn't funny at all. There also is a (slightly better) USSR article. --TheLibrarian 17:45, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Redirect to USSR --Spintherism 18:21, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Wot he ^^^^ said --Elvis 09:04, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Merge with Soviet Russia --Algorithm 05:26, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Merge to Soviet Russia and Redirect to USSR then, not that there's really anything worth merging. --Spintherism 07:53, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

We have Russian reversal, Soviet, Soviet Union, USSR, Soviet Russia and URRSRSS. Of this fine mess, Russian reversal is OK, Soviet and USSR could (and likely should) be combined into one article, Soviet Union and Soviet Russia contain relatively little of value that isn't in Russian reversal and are good candidates to be redirected there (or perhaps to the gulag). --Carlb 02:29, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)

How's about this, Delete URRSRSS, merge content of articles relevant to the political entity to USSR, and content relevant to russian reversal to Russian reversal, then redirect Soviet Russia and Soviet Union to USSR, and for Soviet either rewrite as an article about soviet councils or something or use as a disambiguation page for other Soviet/Commie/Pinko/Red related pages--Spintherism 05:14, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Expanded and kept --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Dont we have a page called "Sandbox" that is similar to what this page tried to do ? --Nytrospawn 03:46, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Rewrite & Keep: this shows some faint promise as a parody of Uncyclopedia (parody of a parody???) --DWIII 00:17, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Delete It's not funny, and it's useless. Although be bold was, but one joke, isn't worth an article --TheLibrarian 12:31, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Added Wonderful and Scintillating Content --Spintherism 19:22, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keeper It has definite promise. I'm always a sucker for self-depreciative humor, as long as I can disassociate myself from the group while reading/writing it. At least give me a few days to beat on it more. --Famine 04:06, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Redirected to Urine. --Carlb 09:35, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --EvilZak 06:35, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Merge with Urine --TheLibrarian 17:32, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Merge with Urine --Teknorat 23:16, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Flush. --Carlb 15:26, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Laxative case

Expanded and kept --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I sort of like the idea of this article, so I'll try my hand at expanding/rewriting it --Spintherism 23:38, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I started rewriting it. Somebody read it and pull off the vfd tag if it shows promise of being funny when completed. --Spintherism 00:22, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Expand Better now. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Kept --Rcmurphy 14:31, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite. Some potential here, but the entire article needs to be rewritten in a much darker shade of green. --Carlb 16:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I agree. I can barely read it from my computer. Freibetalk

Keep, change the font colors --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Recolored How now? --Repairman Jack 15:33, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep --Rcmurphy 23:42, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Six Nations

Kept --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Its just not funny. Nonsense without any real redeeming content.--The Werle 02:56, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Expand, Move (from 6 Nations) to Six Nations, & Keep -- DWIII 04:47, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wot DWIII Said --Elvis 09:08, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rewritten as Six Nations to assign both a sports franchise and a Six Nations rugby nation to each Iroquois tribe. Could still use a little work. --Carlb 15:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep History geeks will get it, I like the idea of comparing the Iroquois confederacy to sports franchises.--slack 15:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

From QuickVFD


Kept for now --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keep I like it's wierdness. --Elvis 21:25, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Meh. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

From QuickVFD


Kept --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keep Quite liked it.--Elvis 21:06, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Needs a major rewrite also doesn't it cause confusion with Pimp? --Repairman Jack 13:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep Not bad. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Stubbed --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Expand I think it has promise. --Elvis 18:32, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Expand Add to the Stub list. --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete Can't say I find it humorous. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Just enough to give your kids a treat

Stubbed --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keep Made me laugh, especialy the Milky Bar Kid reference. --Elvis 18:32, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Expand Add to the Stub list. --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Guybrush Threepwood and Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

Rewritten --Rcmurphy 14:39, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

"A simulator designed specifically to teach children how to kill prostitutes. The simulation was so realistic infact, that the prostitute problem in most major cities has disappeared..."??? *shaking head* --Carlb 20:55, 22 May 2005 (EDT)
Rewrite I like the direction it's going in, but it is pretty stupid as it stands now. --Orborde 01:20, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Hmmmm...merge and expand?--slack 13:47, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

Delete --Repairman Jack 11:27, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

Expand/Merge/Rewrite - Has Potential--Dave 14:52, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete both --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Expand/Rewrite - GTA article has potential. Should be heavily re-written. --Teknorat

Gay Niggers from Outer Space

Deleted Even as a wikipdeia article it's terrible and uninformative. --Famine 00:38, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Slurs and insults are all well and good, but only in moderation. This page most definately exceeded our gay nigger quota --Nytrospawn 02:29, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 02:47, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keep and rewrite It's straight from the wikipedia article. There is a high potential for humour, though. --Bugmenot 03:18, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete It's one thing to make fun of gays and niggers, but I will not see the good people of Outer Space mocked in this way. --Cap'n Ben 07:51, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Not funny--TheLibrarian 09:22, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Unless my sarcasm detector is off, I think some of you don't realise that it's a real movie and this article is a copy of a real, serious article from Wikipedia. Of course it isn't funny. Delete it because of that, not because it's "insulting". --Bugmenot 09:36, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete I can't even see a way to turn it into a funny spork--Elvis 10:05, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 17:41, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Seeing as how this is directly taken from Wikipedia, then its only obvious that it should be deleted. We actually want as much of our articles to be original --Nytrospawn 21:44, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Pisi and Ciuc

Defeated --Rcmurphy 20:16, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Anyone notable or just another inside joke??? --Carlb 17:28, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)

The number of red links in the second article makes me suspect that both are just inside jokes --Nytrospawn 22:53, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete BOOORIIING. --DrAwesome 05:16, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Though it is a very sweet story and all. Ah, young love. --Rcmurphy 02:48, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Boring indeed --TheLibrarian 09:23, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Whether it's an inside joke or not, it's not funny --Codeine 20:07, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Patriot Act

Delete--Nytrospawn 03:05, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete It's an eyesore and isn't anything remotely close to humor. CANXX0RZ ITZ --Flammable 06:37, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete 'nuff said --TheLibrarian 09:10, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Here01, Here02, Here03 ... Here11

Burn'd at the stake

Delete --Rcmurphy 04:20, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I won't vote to keep it, because it's not really Uncyclopedia material, but it sort of entertained me. --Spintherism 05:07, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete This looks like a special ed kid trying to make an infinite loop. --EvilZak 05:36, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Unless someone can think of a better punchline. --Cap'n Ben 07:34, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Move to Userspace I liked it, especialy the punch line! --Elvis 09:16, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

'Keep It brought a smile-- 09:54, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Move to Userspace It would be excellent for a user page, but not for something spanning eleven articles. And it's not Uncyclopedia material. --TheLibrarian 21:38, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Userspace --Nytrospawn 01:26, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete--DrAwesome 15:02, 9 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Barnacle 00:09, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete I don't think it's amusing, and it's a load of junk. It's certainly in line with all of the "infinite loop" jokes. It's a load of crap. He's already up to 20 or 25 by now.--Flammable 06:33, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keep It amused me so much that I made it approximately twice as good (as Flammable has already noted). I did remove the original "punchline", but I added another one (following someone else's lead.) --Bugmenot 11:58, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

but why is it that you feel this should be in the uncyclopedia? It's not in uncyclopedia style... Don't you think this would be better in the userspace? --TheLibrarian 12:23, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)
I feel it is an elegant (if not concise) illustration of the concept of "here". Why should that belong in userspace, rather than in the article on "here"? --Bugmenot 01:44, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Because Uncyclopedia is a parody af an encyclopedia, "here" could never be in an encyclopedia, beacause it's not formulated as an article. I could stand it in the userspace, but not in the uncyclopedia.--TheLibrarian 09:25, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)
(Outdenting) A lot of articles are in uncyclopedia that couldn't appear in an encyclopedia because it's a parody. And a lot of articles aren't very satirical, and are in uncyclopedia just because they are funny. But if most people don't appreciate it... by all means, delete it. --Bugmenot 11:14, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Its not even funny. We have plenty of infinite loops, which in all likelyhood, will be deleted. I was lenient when I said to move those to user space. --Nytrospawn 22:50, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)
BALEETE. As a n00b I may be speaking out of turn here but that's never stopped me yet. The only thing I found faintly interesting about Here was going backwards by typing the URL in, starting at about I mean, everybody knows what's going on after the first page. --OEJ

A few things, if I may:

  1. nooblets are welcome to vote. I mean, don't get me wrong - we ignore all non-admin votes, as a rule. But if it makes you feel better, by all means make your voice heard! It's kind of cute, like a kid dressing up in a suit to appear all grown up;
  2. why is this series of pages attracting so much attention? Do people feel that strongly about it? Personally I think the pages are pretty mundane fodder;
  3. I agree with Nytrospawn. Even if this isn't an infinite loop proper, it's close enough, and we have more than enough of those;
  4. I didn't know we had this many users anyway;
  5. I was kidding about #1. Of course we take all votes into consideration;
  6. hooray for democracy;
  7. in addition to votes, we are also influenced by bribes. At least I am.

--Rcmurphy 23:45, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)

It's an infinite loop unfolded. It may be the first of its kind (I may be totally wrong about that, though). It can be extended forever. Doesn't that appeal to anyone? --Bugmenot 01:40, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)

It definately doesnt appeal to me, and since there are enough votes for deletion, those pages will hereby be deleted. --Nytrospawn 18:19, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Elisean Fields

Piked --Rcmurphy 20:21, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Nytrospawn 00:46, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Isn't it spelt Elysian, in any case... --Twilkitri 10:05, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 23:36, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Sdafl;sgbs 2

Piked --Rcmurphy 23:42, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

No.. not even Uncyclopedia can make anything out of THIS. --King Nintendoid 20:07, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete I would have put it in QVFD --TheLibrarian 21:31, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Teknorat 23:17, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 23:42, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Heaven Mark 2

Dead --Rcmurphy 15:15, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --EvilZak 06:35, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --The Werle 17:13, 4 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete It isn't funny or Ironic, this couldn't have taken more than three seconds to come up with --TheLibrarian 12:34, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Zzzzzzzzz Darguz Parsilvan 14:38, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)


Eaten --Rcmurphy 22:05, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete Posting a copyrighted comic from another site? Seems like bad form. Plus, haven't the Michael Moore fat jokes kinda been done to death? --Steve Johnsenson 04:31, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bigger than cheeses isnt a great comic to begin with --Nytrospawn 20:11, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete it's not even funny --TheLibrarian 21:34, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Trent Lott

Baleeted Trent Lott is from Mississippi anyway, not Montana. There will be a test on this. --Rcmurphy 15:16, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Carlb 07:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Shock humour - humour = crap --Cap'n Ben 00:54, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Ooo, such stunning wit. Not. Darguz Parsilvan 14:40, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Juhan Parts

Killed --Rcmurphy 23:42, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite or Delete... how can people do this to the English language, even if it is foreign to them? --Carlb 01:17, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite is an english translation available? --Elvis 16:41, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete Legibility would just make the lack of humor more easily accessible. --Spintherism 20:10, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete --Nytrospawn 20:37, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

From QuickVFD

Ringo Starr

Stubbed --Rcmurphy 23:42, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Expand--Elvis 16:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Expand How did this get in Quick VFD in the first place? --Spintherism 17:49, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Kept --Rcmurphy 23:42, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Keep --Elvis 16:11, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Keep It's okay. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sane, single, heavenly bodies

Huffed --Rcmurphy 23:42, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Delete as unnecessary duplicate of existing intelligent women rewrite series (see below) which adds nothing new, sad to say was done better the first time --Carlb 15:38, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Repairman Jack 13:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete or at least move them to Undictionary --Cap'n Ben 14:08, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Delete or maybe incorporate them into a major Woman article. --Rcmurphy 02:19, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)