This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.
WAPOC!!! h4X0rs need to change their diapers and STOP WRITING ARTICLES! Thank you. I'm feeling better now. Delete, please. --Smrt-guy 02:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Declare peace. Mildly humourous title followed by a bunch of random names. --El Zoof 23:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
It could be so much more - such as a mildly interesting article. Delete --Smrt-guy 00:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I believe there is an infinite plethora of crappy articles from 2005/early 2006 laying around. It is our endless goal to delete these and make the world (or at least Uncyclopedia) a better place for all. Delete. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 00:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Scratch and sniff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Huff --GeneralInsineratehymn 03:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Huffed, voting closed. -- 13:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete Random nonsense, and not even funny random nonsense. --El Zoof 12:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Random + bad + ugly = Delete --Smrt-guy 20:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey, it's the weekend, you know what it means? It means I can vote on crap! Delete for celebration reasons, and also because it sucks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Huffed, voting closed. -- 13:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep - I laughed, I cried (from cutting it open), I ask for a rewrite, but let it live. Smrt-guy 21:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
k33p - Funnier than anything I coul come up with. --El Destructeso 23:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Well written, with some good Soviet Union jokes. In Russia, article keeps YOU!! In Russia, surprised should not be YOU!! --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 01:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
in soviet russia, article keeps you --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep and repair. --GeneralInsineratehymn 03:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Personally I think its pointless, random, drivel.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE)ZEROTROUSERS 08:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Oh Yeah, I also want to make a rewrite of it as Serviet Onion.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE)ZEROTROUSERS 08:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Ok, well I personally want to rewrite it, in a not so random manner, but i guess its up to the majority.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE)ZEROTROUSERS 08:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 13:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Only if you change the colour. Red makes my eyes bleed. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep — but I'm biased because I just changed it quite a bit, so I guess it's kinda more "mine" now... but I swear, I really liked the original idea anyway... (/sheepish expression/) —Lenoxus 04:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete It is ugly, to the point that it hurts my eyes, and serves no pourpose, humor-wise or other-wise. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 23:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete Tis' not original.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE)ZEROTROUSERS 08:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
There are enough functionless space-wasting templates on uncyc already without intentionally creating more - jack mort |cunt| talk - 12:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Ahem, taken from the template itself, "This template serves no purpose whatsoever and should be ignored at all costs." —Braydie 16:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
No thanks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I'm okay with deleting the current version, but we should give people an opportunity to perform a complete rewrite to turn the template into something a little more nihilistic (or perhaps a redirect to {{nofu}} or something similar). --Pentium5dot1 05:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Deleted, voting closed. —Braydie 23:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Blocky, clunky, random, and a non-topic. ----OEJ 17:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - and what's even fennier, someone recently added a bunch more random crap. Smrt-guy 19:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete: Well, it appears somebody created a piece of crap, then ZB added a NRV tag. Then somebody else came by, thought they fixed the crap up (which they didn't), and took off the tag. Regardless, delete. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 19:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Ugghhh - THE (NOT SO NOBLE)ZEROTROUSERS 10:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Huh! Electrified is right, there were two applications of the NRV tag to this article -- both back in September. It's not been worked on since the end of October, though, so a 7-day NRV is long expired anyway. ----OEJ 21:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Huffed, voting closed. -- 11:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
BURNINATE!!! --THE (NOT SO NOBLE)ZEROTROUSERS 08:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Umm... it's new and NRVed, which means it'll probably be gone soon anyway and there was no need to VFD it... Unless you just really needed to say how much you hated it, I guess! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 18:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Gone, however true the non-rambling bits are, it's stupid & unfunny. Smrt-guy 21:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Comment: Here I go again rambling about consistency... If this goes, then PAL and SECAM have to go too, since I don't see how they are any better. Perhaps try taking this to Pee Review or merging all the television standards articles into one? --Pentium5dot1 04:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Barely Keep - guys, it is funny...I mean, "A sufficiently lovely girl" Love the Chinglish, though this page needs cleaning. Smrt-guy 21:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep and expand. Also please respectfully to add image of the fierce look woman equipment!! "Though being with a fierce look, the woman equipment was unexpectedly skillful, so Asakura Justice Seen made a misunderstand that he is a real woman and kissed deeply." What translation software was the author using? If he composed this prose intentionally then make no misunderstand, he is a genius. ----OEJ 17:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Maybe I just don't get the "joke", but this seems like random semi-English gibberish about a non-existant cartoon. BALEETED!El Zoof 02:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
It is being of the shit. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Huff Chinglish, yet most of the names are Japanese? Huff for lack of consistency. Whitesidepie4eva!!!I LIKE PIE TOO! 17:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Hmm My guess is that if you think Chinglish is funny and know what these shows are about you'll find it funny. Not sure if it should be deleted outright because of that. --Videshi 03:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure this is classical Chinglish. I think it may be transliterated Japanese -- ie, Japanese "translated" with complete disregard for English grammar and idiom. For example, I copied a random chunk of Japanese text from a sushi vendor website and Babelfished it to English:
"The salmon it flies and the child, the shrimp-quail fermented soybean winds thickly with the sea urchin. Trying sharing with the companion of the workplace, and the friend how, probably will be. It does not leak to the one which is purchase, it presents the sushi bucket where news item of 10 types is settled. * Note: the sushi blacks which are to the picture do not belong to the product."
Personally, I see a potential for great humor here: One takes the fractured prose and inserts sly puns, intentional idiocies, and so forth. I'm willing to make this article a demo project for the idea. (Please stand by, do not adjust your Uncyc, the article will be undergoing a nocturnal re-emission.) ----OEJ 18:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, rats bollocks. It's harder to do than I thought. The article has become mostly a series of dirty jokes and sexual innuendos. Huff it if no one finds it funny, please. ----OEJ 02:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep I wrote the article so I'm biased, of course. Honestly I think someone on an unsigned IP address is post-stalking me and VFDing whatever article I put up. Still, since it's tagged I feel kinda obligated to put up the article for voting.
k33p - Quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read, but there's no point deleting it. --El Destructeso 23:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
put in photo album to look at later --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep, I don't get it, but damn it made me crack up. Mr. Briggs Inc. 04:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC) eh?
Keep. The three sections are riffs on ambition, fear of failure, and insecurity. I suspect the narrator is serving seven-to-ten in Pelican Bay for acting out with violent surrealism.----OEJ 15:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
MY EYES! THE GOGGLES DO NOTHING! --GeneralInsineratehymn 17:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - This guy is either the very definition of Bat Fuck Insane or he's on some higher plane of existence. I'm not sure it really matters which from our point of view...! -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 19:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I have never been more torn over an article than this one. It's brilliant, yet stupid. It reminds me of handwritten posters the crazies put up on light posts in Westwood. But is it Uncyc material? Smrt-guy 23:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 17:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Dude...keep and expand. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, keep it, gooood times... Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
I forgot I wrote this article. I read it and it made me laugh. Keep. --Teepegg 20:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep - and find Insineratehymn something to stop him... well, insinerating when he sees a list. :-P -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 20:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
keep i guess - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Not exactly the stuff of wet dreams by comedians everywhere, but not too crappy either. --Medvedev(scream) 14:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Not feature quality, but not everything is. Maybe Yautja is more your speed NAB. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Keep It is a fairly decent peice of writing. User NeedABrain might want to follow up on his own diagnosis and get himself a brain prothesis. I hear the Alzheimer Company of California makes some darned good ones. -- di Mario 20:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations!!! You're our 1,000,000 customer playing the same joke on my user name. Your prize is a rubber lollipop, please get it at the counter and rub off. :D -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 21:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
keep on the condition that someone condenses and de-shittys it - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Maybe I'm nicer on weekends, but we should keep it and hope it gets the attention it deserves. It's kinda funny! Smrt-guy 22:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Huff. I was just wondering "hey, how's the Predator uncyc article?" and so I came to this piece of useless display of cinéfilie. Predator really deserves more and this is not the kind of article that can be reformed. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 13:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
~
I think the fact another article on Predator already existing should justify a redirect page there. But, as you wish, I give up. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 21:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 17:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. The author clearly ran out of breath halfway (I know the feeling), but the base is good. --Medvedev(scream) 14:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep Hey, someone read my article! Wooo...! Also, I like it... --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 17:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
yeah, this isn't blinding, but it's not bad enough for vfd - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
It's got a good start, and borders on funny. Just needs a little TLC, some dusting, maybe a new coat of paint. Smrt-guy 22:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
needs a lot of rewrite --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
It's not great, but it's not crap. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete I'm really the actual nominator, this is awful. He literally has a jar for a head? Is that really the joke? Quadzilla99 01:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Due to recent discussions here, I'm placing this up for deletion. —Braydie at 13:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Needs work. "Recently, Vietnam veterans, who had the jar implants have been winding up with knifes through there torsos"? How about knives and their? And get those ungrammatical commas out of there. The image needs an upgrade too. ----OEJ 15:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 17:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
keep pointing out hypocrisy is not racial hatred, although this thing should have an article to stay around --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 21:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
it's used on Racism so keep until someone finds a replacement image. the image itself is certainly not racist because it's not shitting on one race it's shitting on humans as a whole. that said the guy who uploaded it did go by the name negrowned, which isn't great - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, the White Power guy is a handsome, young student, while the other two are depicted as dirty, ill-mannered and ugly. --Medvedev(scream) 21:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Serves no satirical purpose, is not used in redeeming context, blatantly promotes racial hatred and is not funny. --Medvedev(scream) 13:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Not sure about the racism charges, but I don't understand this, which makes me frightened and confused, so delete. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 20:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete as unnecessary copyvio. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 21:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep., it's a good list, has potential for expansion, and just look at Incinerate him's reason for deletion! Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
keep and fix-up - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I rarely vote Keep, but this is FUNNY! And, those are some of my best friends. Slap on a 7-day fix, though. Smrt-guy 22:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
bad lists are common, this isn't one of them --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I deleted a related article, and when I came to delete that H-Bomb picture I found this. Horrible. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 00:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Indeed, Delete--Jsemmens 00:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Pitiful AAAAAAAAA!-clone --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. I think somebody wanted to make the MS-Paynt mushroom cloud into a kind of personal meme. It's spammed into The Demented Cartoon Movie in a similarly ugly, article-disrupting way.----OEJ 01:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Blarch it Replication of the "immediate explosion" joke in TDCM --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 04:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
For God's sake. It's gneomI 12:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Pile of crap. This article would be funny if fanboys didn't write it. Not to say that fanboys did or didn't write it, but it just comes across as fancruft. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Huff Unfunny and rude. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 04:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Not that smart - It's gneomI 12:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Useless disambig. I would just delete this, but I feel I should probably let you all agree with me first. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 22:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Since I was the one who tried to QVFD it in the first place, delete. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 22:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, but find a place for "Hubba Bubba, dream of lovers"!!! Smrt-guy 23:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
d3l373 - What was the point of writing this? --El Destructeso 23:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
junky junky junk --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - it seems like it's basically truth, only the fictional kind. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 20:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete, though thank you to Jack_mort for the explanation. I was thinking it was a GF vanity page! Still, pointless. Smrt-guy 23:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
'kesu --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
It is fiction, can't find any reference to a deity called minna, it's just the japanese for 'everyone', like to get people's attention. it's coherant, i like it, but it's not funny and it's almost unexpandable - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep I find it humourous. It makes fun of all the buzzwords my boss insists on using to demonstrate his savvy (yeah right) and besides, it is biased against Microsoft. Also, it describes accurately that managers always listen to whining customers and never listen to the reasonable counter-arguments of the worker drones that are supposed to fix the unfixable. -- di Mario 20:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Scanning for humor... Scan complete. Humor found: 0. Judgment protocol:Delete. --GeneralInsineratehymn 08:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Article has suffered a fatal exception error in module humour.dll and will bedeleted. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 11:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Failure to find clever way to say ...delete. goshzillacorrespondence 17:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
I was hoping for some puns on pies. Hmmm....yummy pies. Instead, I get a copy & paste from MSoft literature. If they made it MORE so, I'd say keep. Smrt-guy 22:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
<insert pie related pun here> --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Hi, guys! Hmmm.... errr... Why am I here? (shrugs) Durrhh... -- The Colonel(talk) 19:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep Chuckleworthy even if not the best article ever - doesn't need deleting, just expansion tag. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 12:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep If someone adds just how tasty they are. Smrt-guy 21:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep Short but reasonably coherent. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 05:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
keep and longify - jack mort |cunt| talk - 21:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually has a point to it, a point about Canada Geese, keepMr. Briggs Inc. 04:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
Delete - Been awhile since the last edit, means no improvement. Also this is my first VFD so sorry if I made mistakes! :P It's gneomI 08:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete- Although I agree with some of the author's views on the birds, the page needs to be rewritten or just deleted. --Captain Kickass 09:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Honk. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I slid in goose poop once, it was disgusting, but not as disgusting as this article. Huff. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Me like. Come on - it has chemical formulae involving pigs! What more could you want? -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 12:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep Silly, yet potential to become funny. -- di Mario 18:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep per Strange but Untrue. --Medvedev(scream) 22:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete- I see no potential humor in the page...--Captain Kickass 06:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete - Me neither. Pretty hard to think of expansion. It's gneomI 08:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete just to teach them a lesson! Bwahahaha! Seriously - huff it. Smrt-guy 21:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)*
De-1337 I'm sorry, this is just not funny, it lacks quality, lacks formatting, it's abundant in red links, and is uncategorized. These are all very big no-nos. It's had a total of 14 edits within the last six months, a majority of those from the same three or four people. Overall: low quality rubbish that fails to reach even the bare minimal standard of a page on Uncyclopedia. Underserving of the crap template, and should just be deleted. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 19:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
emc..... show me where the article touched you. - jack mort |cunt| talk - 22:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep I am willing to keep this if someone will actually rewrite it, if no one is going to go through the effort, huff it.--Jsemmens 00:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep but please be sure to baby-sit the authors, <insert name here>! Yes you!. It is very actively being edited by what appears to be a group of adolescents. They have the drive, but not yet mastered the requirements. Should that go punished with a death sentence? Methinks notte. You, <insert name here> are now their designated mentor. Go on! Do something! I'll be watching you... di Mario 18:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Screw the username template. I hate hate hat it. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Put rewrite, it has potential. It's gneomI 08:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Sucks beyond belief. When it's not being a list, it's being unfunny. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
It's boring. Just plain uninteresting. If you can make it funny, do it, but do it soon. --Videshi 02:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete Mired in scatological randomness. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 08:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete I recall finding it funny at one point, but it's just been ruined over time. I love One Piece, and would rather have an article about it on Uncyclopedia, but I honestly feel there's nothing I can do to improve it. Roman Dog Bird 22:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I took a look at it. As soon as I saw quotes about raping, I have but one thing say: Delete. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment: I think that I was able to remove most of the stupid raping references.--Jsemmens 01:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
What!? the raping was the best bit! - jack mort |cunt| talk - 22:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
cockbag, i am more than happy for uncyc to be bloated with anime articles, provided they are well written, coherant, and funny even to people who don't know the show. this is none of the above - jack mort |cunt| talk - 22:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
There's a lot of content there. If it's rewritten, as Jsemmens suggested, then it's worth keeping. Otherwise, huff it. -fish 04:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment Very true in principle especially with those two, but is this really funny? It strikes me as being 90% retarded and 10% offensive. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 06:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment Correction: sometimes something is funny despite being offensive. That said, it takes a pretty sick mind to read the above article and laugh. We're not training psychos here. --Medvedev(scream) 07:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Defence I just hate that "being offensive" is sole grounds for deletion. And yes, some humor is funny due to its being so offensive about something no one will be offensive about. goshzillacorrespondence 11:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Un-Defence "Being offensive" is not sole grounds for deletion. Being offensive and not funny is. It's just not amusing. --Videshi 01:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
It is rather amusing. A supposedly brain-dead person writing an eloquent monologue about starving to death and digesting their own body as if they were just receiving meals in a hospital/retirement home or similar. And then complaining about the quality of the food. It's funny, you just can't see past the supposed offensiveness. •Spang•☃•talk• 02:00, 9 Feb 2007
Delete as nominator. I find this article highly offensive to Terri Schiavo and also lacking in humor. It needs to be deleted for the same reason that the image of Stephen Hawking "playing" DDR was removed from the DDR article. I originally tagged this as {{merge}}; then, I gave up and tried to QVFD the article with the merge tag still present, which resulted in the article not being deleted. Thus, I'm taking this here. --Pentium5dot1 01:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Clarification: Compared to the two articles mentioned by Goshzilla, this article lacks sufficient humor value to compensate for its offensiveness. Part of the offensiveness comes from the horrible factual inaccuracy (it fails to adequately express the magnitude of Terri Schiavo's brain damage). Also, the article hasn't been worked on for quite a while (although I should probably have given other users a chance to fix it up). All in all, given how deletionist Uncyclopedia seems to be, I felt that I should have a fair chance of getting this crap sub-optimal article deleted...but please continue discussing. --Pentium5dot1 01:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Counter-Clar: The inaccuracy is the point, and I have fixed the article up somewhat. goshzillacorrespondence 04:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Um, all right. Changing vote to Weak Delete or Possible Merge. --Pentium5dot1 17:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete More offensive than funny. --GeneralInsineratehymn 02:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. It's like making an article about a 9/11 victim jumping out of the WTC window. Only worse. And I'm not even American! --Medvedev(scream) 07:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Offensive? Possibly. Funny? ....Delete. El Zoof 12:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
WTF??? NRV DEL TIA Smrt-guy 00:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
What? I am offended that something so blah could be inspired by whatever country it is that I am from.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
No hope. It's gneomI 00:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey! A list! Plus it makes fun of Vega. No one makes fun of Vega, man. Half of his moves involved running away. I respect that. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 00:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
It's been totally raped by unfunny people who think individual sexual words are funny. A total rewrite is what this needs: might as well delete it. --Videshi 07:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
GOOD GOD, KILLKILLKILLKILLKILLKILL --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Has potential. --Medvedev(scream) 07:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
It blows. Kill it before it breeds. --Videshi 07:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Make it go away. ~ 10:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
With line such as "time travelling expedition to the 2nd hippie era," I must say delete.—The preceding unsigned comment was added byGoshzilla (talk • contribs)
The image is eye bleedingly bad. Maybe it is the visual representation of the article? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete It seems the New Zealanders have their share of rascists too. Not good (tm) -- di Mario 18:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Well it can be expanded in a good way, like without using the word dog. But at present it's not that good. Not going to vote. It's gneomI 08:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Death by Zb. —Braydie at 13:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. This seems to lack general funniness and doesn't seem to parody the Wikipedia article in any significant way. ----OEJ 01:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Blarch it Short, unfunny, obscure subject. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 01:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Wow it's pointless ha ha ha ha ha ha delete. --Videshi 01:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete Completely useless.--Jsemmens 01:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Unanimate She looks too much like a certain young woman that turned me down when I was a laddy. Broke me heart at the time -- di Mario 18:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete She looks like my wife, only not as hot...and too anime. And becuase it's a pointless article. Smrt-guy 21:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I agree it should be deleted, but I don't think it rhymes with Famine. The name is actually pronounced Nah-min-ay. Just for the record...--Captain Kickass 06:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Well, I was thoroughly transfixed by this article. It made me forget for a while. And it is well-written, close to the real truth and it made me laugh smile a few times -- di Mario 18:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep - Put rewrite. It is not as "WTF?" as other VFD articles. It's gneomI 08:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete for the same reason Baldrick was nominated - it's nothing more than a completely accurate character synopsis. Kill it dead. El Zoof 04:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete He's right, y'know. -fish 04:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. "Quoting comedians is not funny." --Medvedev(scream) 20:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep and expand. I liked it a lot. --Medvedev(scream) 18:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Short. Not interesting.----OEJ 17:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
d3l373 - Didn't like it. --El Destructeso 20:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Superdupermegahuff. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Move first paragraph into Dinosaur article (chuckleworthy), but then Delete the rest. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 23:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Outta Here. It had potential, "had" being the operative word. -fish 04:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Huffed, voting closed. -- 16:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. As someone who's never got around to reading all of the Norris-related pages yet, I think some of it's very funny and don't want it all huffed from under my nose. So to speak. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
keep, know it wont get kept, it's a randomist list of nonsense, but it made me laugh, and THAT'S ALL THAT MATTERS - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. Chuck is now a very, very worn out Internet meme/fad/cliché. He is highly undersirable on every other pages, but we have to keep a place to, let's say, release this pressure. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 20:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong Keep, if we don't, then they have an excuse to put it on other pages. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Quarinteen them here lest they spread. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 23:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep per NeedABrain. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 08:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Chuck Norris sucks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Too much crap. This list is full of crap I'd rather not read. Cut it back BIG TIME or get rid of it, that's what I say. --Videshi 02:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Needs at least some background. Major rewrite. --Medvedev(scream) 18:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Briggs: It clearly states on HowTo:Get Banned that one of the most prominent offenses is to "Write Chuck Norris Facts. Anywhere." --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, yeah, well this gives n00bs a place to write them so they don't have to pollute everything else. As Israel said, "Quaranteen". Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
Hmm, good point, but a big question is will some of the Norris fools here be content with that? Mr. Briggs Inc. 23:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
I mentioned this on the Talk page already, but wouldn't it be funnier to have this page full of ACTUAL facts about Chuck? NumberJunkie 13:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. Dammit. -- 16:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Just the fact that someone wants to delete this page is ridiculous.-Mustkillroy
NO. De-crufting, yes. And keeping off other pages, certainly. But if this is deleted, it will be repaced with crap that is nowhere near as good as it is now, no matter how good it actually is now. I notice you didn't give any reasons either. Do you want to delete it because of the content, or the title? Because I'm sure codeine's mum knows chuck norris, if you know what I mean. Rewrite it if you think it sucks by all means, but you don't need it to be deleted to do that. •Spang•☃•talk• 03:43, 5 Feb 2007
Keep I was going to say what Spang said, but didn't have time earlier. Keep per Spang. —Braydie at 04:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. What's next - Jesi? The article is decent. If you have an allergy to Chuck Norris - don't read it. --Medvedev(scream) 19:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
keep. I agree with whichever other people said approximately the same thing i'm saying now. chuck on every page is a plague, but there's no reason he shouldn't have one page. he earned that at least and no more, plus if you delete it it will be back in a day and shitter - jack mort |cunt| talk - 20:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep, this is one of the foundations of Uncync, as much as we try to avoid using it in new articles, we should keep the original. ~ 12:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
You heartless bastards! Would you kill Oscar next? Mr. T? Have you no sense of history? History!--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
This is not "some kind of sick joke". I acctaully want to delete this article. I will do it to. Just as soon as you all vote for it. --BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 20:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
This is probably the one article I will vote to delete, it belongs on ED. I say keep some of the better parts (he is, despite popular belief, a man, not a joke), and actually add satire to the new article. (parody the meme, incorporate the facts into the bio, etc...) Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
I like that idea. Tell the story of Chuck's life as if all the facts were true and incorporate them into events. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 01:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Chuck Norris must die. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I'd agree that 90% of it by volume is crap. If I had/have some free time, I'd be more than happy to rewrite it. Not that it would make anyone happy, but I've no problem with that. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition»02/6 03:09
Look, as sick as many people are of Chuck, I think he needs a page of some sort. Even if it's a parody of the meme or something. --»His Majesty King George VI(the boxes) 22:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
The page needs to exist, and a bunch of the stuff there is good. I suggest we save it IF one or two good editors volunteer to clean it up. I offer myself to start, if that'll do. Smrt-guy 03:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep and Rewrite. Having started the 'UnRoadMap' thing (though not starting this Alaska article), I feel it has some great potential and, with a rewrite, could be good. - Enzo Aquarius 04:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep as element of UnRoadMap. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 08:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep. A good, if undeveloped, example of hyperbole. -fish 04:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete
Delete I see nothing redeeming in this, it's not funny, and all of the links go nowhere.--Jsemmens 17:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep but expand muchly - I'm surprised such a common word has attracted so little attention. -- (but) UntrueWhhhy?Whut?How?*Back from the dead* 16:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep but don't expand. Cut back, in fact. Simplicity is sometimes a virtue. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byVideshi (talk • contribs)
Huff it, then do (or hope for) a better one. Smrt-guy 04:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments
If this is deleted, then There has to go too. Either delete both or keep both. In more detail: I know that my mergist philosophy doesn't really fit in with Uncyclopedia's deletionism, but either take both pages Here and There to Pee Review first, or turn them into an infinite redirect loop. Pentium5dot1 00:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Templating There with {{fix}} accordingly. Pentium5dot1 01:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 16:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
