This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.
Keep It's about booze, so it can't be all bad (and yes, I am still sulking). -- di Mario 13:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. A 10-minute scribble. To author: Put some bloody effort in, laddie. To everyone else: Merry Christmas, or Happy Druid Days, and thank God the days are getting longer if you're not in Oz or Ned Zed.----OEJ 16:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
It'll be a merry Christmas when this crap doesn't exist anymore. --UNKNOWNFILE 16:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
LOL! - Delete. --—Braydie 16:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Off with his head. Looks like someone was ON Sobe when they wrote this. --Andorin Kato 02:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Murder --GeneralInsineratehymn 07:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
kidnap, rape, murder, rape, decapatate - jack mort |cunt| talk - 17:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Bundy was a friend of mine. He deserves better. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 01:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, and his brother Al had his own TV sitcom, with a rather yummy looking blond who was always finding interesting ways in which to ... nevermind (still sulking) -- di Mario 13:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep the article currently isn't so good, but give it an expansion sticker and see what happens it does seem to have potential.Nullius in Verba 05:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I found this somewhat funny, but it really should be re-written in parts. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep and expand --Alksub 23:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Abstain! Being a virgin myself, or was it Pisces ? March 30, 1960..Year of the Dragon. Figures. Anyroads, there's a companion article Virgin Mobile that is a lot more funny. -- di Mario 13:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Huff How was this never QVFDed!? --GeneralInsineratehymn 17:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - People slacking. --—Braydie 17:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Unexist. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. 'Nuff said.----OEJ 16:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Another senseless victim in the war on death. And yes, indeed, how nice of you to ask, I'm still sulking. -- di Mario 13:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Rip heart out of chest and throw it on the floor and stomp on it till it dies. What a senseless waste of time... --Andorin Kato 23:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain Being très cool myself, I cannot vote against my own. Sulk, sulk, sulk. -- di Mario 14:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
The title of this article tells me exactly what this article is, and the content of the article confirms it. Maul. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
I would like to vote "Keep" because the idea is worthy, but as I am unable to do the required heavy lifting to rewrite and expand the piece I must abstain. An ab stain is when you spill red wine on your stomach, incidentally, and are too drunk to wipe it off before it dries.----OEJ 16:21, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
If most of it is plagiarized then delete. --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete as copyvio. --Alksub 23:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
norton disk wipe I allmost voted keep (yes I am still sulking) but then I saw at the end he defiles the name of Alan Turing (the Sophia of computer nerds) and that made me very sad...-- di Mario 14:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete--O bless St. Nick, this is all in Finnish and is short and despite a small history of edits has somehow escaped the coal scuttle.----OEJ 03:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Finnish is the language of the devil. Poistaa--Prolix 03:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Give Absurdism a fair chance of polishing it up. As as for the critizism that we already have God v Nietsche, maybe we could start a whole series of mock debates in their own category. "Irresistable Force" versus "Unmovable Object" springs to mind, or Kramer vs Kramer... -- di Mario 14:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
keep. I reformated it, much less ugly and much easier to read now - jack mort |cunt| talk - 17:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
I DISApprove This Message Nothing but quotes. Not even remotely funny. 00:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment ~_~, God V. Nietzsche was an old joke. That's like when people try to mimic AAAAAAAAA! with other gobshite. Try writing an UnBook. 20:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
i made some edits, it's still short on content but it's less bad - jack mort |cunt| talk - 19:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
IMPORTANT NOTE TO ADMINS: the votes above refers to another version, not the one reverted on dec 25 by Kokot.kokotisko. -- herrdoktorneedsAraygun[scream!] 23:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
I hate to say it, but this is actually the genesis of an idea. The question is, how could you do an article on Onomatopoeia that doesn't look like this article? - Lemon. 23:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
I was coming up with a new version, but then I accidentaly clicked the "previous page" button. AWWWWWRRRRGH!!!! -- herrdoktorneedsAraygun[scream!] 23:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Well done, Brain. - Lemon. 01:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
This is really great. On December 8, somebody rewrites the article into babble, and on December 22 it is posted for deletion without anybody noticing the original version. Good job. --Kokot.kokotisko 21:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Sincerely, I've noticed your previous version. Noticed. Hell, I've really noticed it. This is a wiki, y'know? You better watch your dear hatchlings more carefully. By the way, I'm not starting an edit war, so I will copy my version to my userpage an see what happens. As it concerns to me, your version is still VFDed, but I will not cast the first vote. -- herrdoktorneedsAraygun[scream!] 22:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
I didn't know - --Kenvalyi 16:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Rename to "Famous Underestimators of Russian Winters" - Lemon. 01:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
KeepMost categories are inherently pointless, thats why you hardly see them around, except in most of my articles, since I love the little buggers.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
leave out in the snow. so unnecccessarry - jack mort |cunt| talk - 16:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I guess this list is made for military leaders who got caught by the Russian winter. Did you miss this History class? -- herrdoktorneedsAraygun[scream!] 01:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I don't understand deleting it, since it's a catergory and not a real page. Prolix 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Most acategories are inherently pointless, thats why you hardly see them around, except in most of my articles, since I love the little buggers (yes, its a copypaste).--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep There's no 'humor' here or 'satire or 'parody', but it is a well-regarded fact that random CAPITALIZAITON IS FUCKING FUNNY LOL! --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 02:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
It's a good parody, I think. -- HindleyiteConverse 15:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Not Sold Out for Seven Nights at MSG funny, but more like opening act at the Macomb County Fair and Tractor Pull funny. - --Kenvalyi 16:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Well, I laughed. After my eyes stopped bleeding. -- 20:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. That's a no-brainer. -- Rei 16:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - Eh? --—Braydie 16:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
It would be a shame to delete this. It's a parody of people who write in all caps. Maybe I'm just the only one who thinks it's funny, I don't know. Prolix 23:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Okay, so call me nit-picky, but why is there a redicting userpage, of a user who does not yet exist but may someday, that links to first the userpage and now the talk page of a user with a simialrly spelt and pronounced name, but yet has no links to it? I am aware that the User namespace is typically left alone, but if a User:Mowglee signs up for Uncyclopedia, he/she shouldn't have to be given a userpage which already links to Mowgli's. --SirZombiebaron 08:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Neutral -- Not particularly funny, but I've seen worse. -- Rei 21:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
This is well below the level of acceptable humor. Anything even remotely as bad as this should be deleted without mercy. Just because you've seen worse doesn't mean this isn't delete-worthy shit: it is. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 02:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
There's nothing close to funny on this article, and it has nothing to do with Donnie Darko (the movie or the character). -- Rei 23:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete... NOW --AAA! (AAAA) 04:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Interesting. One of the first Google hits on A. Wyatt Mann, the cartoonist whose work is featured at the bottom of MLK, is quite the cesspool of anti-Semitism, holocaust denial, and paranoid conspiracy theories involving communism. The article being voted on appears to be a soapbox for this viewpoint.----OEJ 15:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Oops, here's a linky. ----OEJ 15:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I think it's a "clever" (by racist standards at least) play on words: A Wyatt Man" = "A White Man". Ooh, satire. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Oooh, that is clever! I'm curious about the user of the pseudonym, though. There's an A. Wyatt Mann cartoon of the day page here, he's mentioned on the lovably cute-n-cuddly jew-hater Vangard News Netword forum, and an anti-hate page quotes a "poem" by him that begins "KIKE, KIKE, Weasel-like, / scheming since a hook-nosed tyke..." So I suspect there is a real rodent human behind the pseudo. An interesting thing to track down. Any leads appreciated...an article is now officially gestating.----OEJ 17:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I think it's odd that A. Wyatt Mann chooses to rip off R. Crumb for this anti-semetic piece. Not sure if that qualifies as irony or not? - Lemon. 21:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Wasn't this up for VFH before? And didn't I vote for it? goshzillacorrespondence 09:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - So what if it's an AAAAAAAAA! clone? There's tons of them here. (Nobody touch Beaker!) --AAA! (AAAA) 09:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Right, I am a bit of a deletionist when it comes to clones, but this is one instance I will allow myself to accept. Just about. Have you never seen The Shining?-- HindleyiteConverse 15:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
No tv and no beer makes Homer go crazy? Damn Shinning.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 16:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - Hell, maybe if this author's lucky, this will become another Uncyclopedia "in-joke." --El Destructeso 22:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep -- I'll be very sad if this goes away. If we hadn't already featured Aaaaaaaaaa!, I would nominate this for featured article. -- Rei 00:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep -- Lots of spaghetti westerns are bad, lots of B-Movies are bad, most AAAAAAA! clones are bad, there are exceptions to near everything, and this, is an exception. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Even I have my limits. For example, I can't drive fifty-five, but seventy is way too much for me.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 10:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Huff. Too many of them already, and it's not that great. -- 10:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. AAAAAAAAA! is funny the first time, after that it's a bore. A clone is not funny at all. And this one is just stupid -- to be logical it would be all WorkWorkWork. Which would still be stupid. ----OEJ 15:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
OEJ seems unfamiliar with the Shining and the countless cultural references to it. -- Rei 07:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - Haven't you ever seen the Badger badger badger video clip? [1] So what if it's an AAAAAAAAA! clone? Nobody cares. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep -- not all that wonderful, but it's not really an AAAAAAAAA! clone in my opinion. It has other words in it. Sort of.----OEJ 21:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
k33p - I don't understand why you guys get so bent out of shape about AAAAAAAAA! clones. It wouldn't be a good running gag if people didn't rip it off all of the time. However, I do admit that all of the AAAAAAAAA! clones are kind of getting annoying, so could you guys please stop? --El Destructeso 23:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - and please cut this out, Sikon. -- Rei 00:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep that video is funny, and the article ain't half bad.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 00:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - this should really be sorted out by the clone machine anyway. --Alksub 08:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Wow, that page is all over the place.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 09:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
D3l373 - Let's just say it could be better. A whole heluva lot better. Also, if the admins decide to keep this page, it definitely really has now to be grammer checked the page.
Delete. And why say "Long, but..."? Long unfunny articles are the worst because people are afraid to delete an article if it's long. They just sit and fester. :P -- Rei 00:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Zinging Corona? WTF? This must have been written by a true beer connoisseur; the kind of guy who likes the way that Schlitz leaves crud in his glass...--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 09:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Huff. And hasn't this been here before? -- 10:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Some guy complained in the VD that his article, this one to be precise, was deleted. -- HindleyiteConverse 16:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Confucius says "Is a disambiguation page with only one possible choice really a disambiguation page?"--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 09:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
It's ugly and such. Been around far to long, and a simple rewrite cannot be done. It should be restarted from the ground up, in my opinion. --SirZombiebaron 21:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Destroy it and start anew. --GeneralInsineratehymn 04:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
No decent humour whatsoever. No-one knows what the hell Freeform radio is, and it's obviously 100% self indulgent. Please, do the honours. --MrMetalFLower 20:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete If there is a drastic, immediate overhaul, I'll change my vote. --LLBean
Comments
Even though I don't think this is very good, I would feel guilty if I said to delete this. That's because I couldn't finish it 'cuz it was sp awful. But still. --El Destructeso 19:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Crude and randumb. --Mitch 06:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - Ok, well it's not written well (the content is crap anyway), if there wasn't a break after every line this wouldn't be very long at all. --—Braydie 14:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - This isn't funny. It really wants to be funny, but it just isn't. Also, this guy should seriously speelcheck his article. --El Destructeso 18:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - I don't really think this is all that bad. While I will admit it's not the funniest article, I believe with a little bit of work it will be worth keeping. Like, maybe if the person wrote it as someone who is trying to attain world domination, and he is trying to convince the readers how great it is. --El Destructeso 00:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Noticed this one baring a {{FFW}} tag, and decided that, mostly because Forest Fire Week is over, VFD would be a better fit. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 06:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Needs to be more about spoilers, I tried to help it a bit. Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Keep. Don't Delete it Yet!!! - Guys, before you delete this, reread. I rewrote everything on the page and its probably funnier now. (Note: I am not the original author. If the original author doesn't like what I did to his page, sorry.) --El Destructeso 19:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Please God, delete it all! Poor Bob tried, but the NRV tag proved too much for him. Shame that the article's old as it is... But please, seriously, this is about as bad at gets, just fucking delete it. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 23:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Even our NRV tag proved futile against this tyrannical article. Delete it before it kills more! --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 01:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete 04:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Too terrible for words.--Winston 12:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Horrible. --Mitch 14:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Spare us, please. There needs to be an article on ska, but this isn't it.--fish 17:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment - As far as I can tell, this is not vanity. Gaston is a character from Beauty and the Beast, that movie. If there's anything I missed, then carry on. --Alksub 00:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, but is anything in the article even remotely related to that character?---Rev. Isra(talk) 01:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
He is indeed a character from that movie, so this is not vanity. That said, it's a tiresome article. Deletable? Too close to call. --The Bard of Uncyclopedia 00:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Duh. Also, "capacitator" is spelled thusly. - Lemon. 21:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I believe the correct term is "WTF". Perhaps with a question mark at the end.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete And furthermore, it's spelled "capacitor", depending if you traveled through time to the modern era. --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Wait a minute. I think this is genuine vanity, but read it. This is great. We (Jews) are the definition of greedy (it's an inside joke not meant to offend anyone).-edit- We can however be quite compasionate. And we are romantic as hell, especially French Jews c'mon - that's a VFH line right there. - Lemon. 21:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete All Schoolcruft End of story. This doesn't even really need to be voted on, it violates Codeine's Mom, therefore, it goes. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 22:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Man, there's a lot of Goyim at this Jewish high school - Lemon. 21:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Probably Myspace slandanity on user WiCkY wIcKy WaX. Probaby also QVFD but put it here instead 'cos of length and existence of several revisions. ----OEJ 01:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
oh, my eyes, they bleed. --no, yuochat 13:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Looks like maybe gamer slandanity.----OEJ 15:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete but we should tottally save those pictures for VFP or....NOT!!!! --SirZombiebaron 18:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete both the articles and the pictures present there. --GeneralInsineratehymn 21:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Killy kill. Vanity, personal attacks against someone we don't know, nonsense, unfunny, outright mean. I don't know who Militia Girl is, but whoever made this is a fucking jerk. (enjoy the talk page as well.) Lemon. 21:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
actually needs some work, but there are a lot worse out there. And the incoherency is, at least, consistent.no, yuochat 13:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. This is a substantial, well-formatted article containing actual jokes and pics. It could use revision (the last bit about "Kelly" should be deleted). But it is not VFD material in my iggnerant opinion.----OEJ 16:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Complete Rewrite. There's no way we can do without a Vietnam War article, but this is just dumb. LLBean--Actually, I take it back. It gets better if you wade through the nonsensical opening. --LLBean
Rewrite. But this is better than a blank page. Lemon. 21:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Looks like a lot of work went into here or not. About as funny as what an 8 year old kid could write. Nothing even makes sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byLamrock (talk • contribs)
Comments
I removed the "Kelly" section, whatever that was. Lemon. 21:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Needs work on consistency and flow, and some original-type pics. Flawed but still better than many articles -- stuff like Fran Drescher and Namine. I think it is above the VFD bar at this time.----OEJ 16:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Attack with Lawnmower but Keep There might be decent jokes in there, but the density is simply ridiculous. --LLBean
Delete
Delete. Just attempt to read the whole thing. It's terrible. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 02:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
meh Killy, although I did like this one line: Journal of Applied Lobotomy Candidate Studies and Nonstandard Floor Buffer Applications , so keep thaqt one line. no, yuochat 13:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. While Googling, I did find this one bit that the article was missing - [the point] - place it where you will. Lemon. 21:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
weak keep, mildly useful --Redribbbon 01:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Its boring and I never use it.--Shas'O'my'gosh 02:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Huff, utter rubbish. It's like a random list of links to the worst Uncyc articles ever. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 07:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete per Sikon. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Let me reiterate. VOTING IS OVER. This constitutes an abuse of VFD; and Shas'O'my'gosh has been blocked by Famine for 3 days for this. I'm tempted to follow suit with everyone who voted here after I posted the "denied" remark. Guys, I'm certain this was done before. —RT. HON.HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep - Easy to expand as self-reference. --Alksub 21:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Merge into Insanity and redirect --Alksub 21:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
the wikipedia entry of this name doesn't evenly remotely correspond to any of the text, so it's suspect vanity. plus, it isn't funny. no, yuochat 15:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Gosh, saying random stuff sure is sophisticated humor. Irreplacable! LLBean 18:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete as a production of Racter --Alksub 22:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Really Weak Keep A few things worth saving, but mostly nonsense. I don't really care if it gets deleted.--Imp88 08:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Huff Vanity, not funny in any way whatsoever. --GeneralInsineratehymn 00:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Just delete it already.--Shas'O'my'gosh 01:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes indeed. If it exists, it should be about the site. This is all about the forums. Lemon. 17:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
It just keeps going, and going, until it gets Deleted --Alksub 22:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Possibly a definitive test of any "no web-forum vanity pages allowed" policy? The thing goes back to March 2005, with probably 400+ edits. I watch its fate, the response to it, with detached interest.----OEJ 00:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep Isn't hugely funny, but it isn't vanity (It is based on colin mochrie) and we need the entry (he's quite famous)--Shas'O'my'gosh 23:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep... in modified form. Seriously modified form. It's an entry worth having, but not so poorly written. fish 15:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete - Suspected vanity. Correct me if I'm wrong. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
If you've ever watched "Who's Line is it Anyway," Colin's the bald guy. Just so you know. —HinoaKUN(talk) 03:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - This is exactly what this site is not for. You're not just supposed to make stupid mentions of Gary Coleman and God and Vin Deasel and expect it to be funny. It's just random and annoying. --El Destructeso 01:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Wow, that page is all over the place. Focus, people!--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Possible Delete - It is totally random and stupid. This crap isn't diserving of Colin. It is important to have an article on him. Maybe a rewrite? 06:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. This would have better chance getting rewritten as a red link Lemon. 17:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete Needs a rewrite, from scratch. --Alksub 22:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
The International School of Port of Spain in Trinidad-and-Tobago is "an accredited, private, independent school" which "provides an excellent education for students from the Caribbean and around the world" and has "a dedicated, experienced, multinational faculty that promotes and delivers an education of the highest calibre." The Uncyc article appears to be a standard-issue parody-by-a-student. Whether the article escapes school-vanity class is arguable. ----OEJ 01:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep I don't see what the problem is.Prolix 19:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. I blame the nom on redshirts...--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - I honestly don't see what the problem with this article is. I think it was quite funny. I especially liked the quote "It's one of the mysteries of the force...or some crap like that." I think this person did a good job on following Uncyclopedia's rules for being funny: he kept it consistent, he blended fact and fiction, and he added an Oscar Wilde quote. I definitely believe this article is worth keeping. --El Destructeso 17:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Uncertain Delete There might be some hidden joke here, like it's a parody of a band I've never heard of, but as far as I can tell there is no band called BEE so I might aswell vote it out.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - Looks like vanity (I think). --AAA! (AAAA) 09:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - If this were a cartoon, I would have lots of lovely little question marks floating above my head. --User:LLBean/sig
Delete Even <insert name here> could produce an article better than this. --GeneralInsineratehymn 19:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
See the entry for W.A.S.P. on the satirical fount of unknowledge, Wikipedia. ----OEJ 01:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I read the wikipedia entry, and found the uncyclopedia one was a bunch of lame puns. I don't change my vote.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - I will admit, this has the potential to be a lot funnier. Maybe if it talked more about corn dogs being a "delicacy," but not about the Civil Rights Movement or any of that other stuff. It's just not funny. --El Destructeso 01:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I don't know anything about the subject (or Sonic for that matter), but it smells like stupid, pointless, stereotypical furry bashing. Are we ED? Also, it was NRV'd by Hinoa on November 26. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 08:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
I hate this article. -- HindleyiteConverse 12:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
7 "gay"s. --—Braydie 12:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
This article has sex with animals Prolix 13:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Burn it and let us watch. --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Please, for the love of God, delete this!! - This article isn't funny. It's just stupid. To be honest, I could not even get through the entire page without stopping. Uncyclopedia is not about acting retarded and gay-bashing. It's about acting mildly- retarded and gay-bashing. --El Destructeso 17:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
SMITE!!! Stereotypical making fun of homosexuals. not funny.--Shas'O'my'gosh 01:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Rewrite It's crap, but we need the entry.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I don't think it's bad enough to delete, but I also don't think it's good enough the way it is to keep. This article has potential, but if it's not changed soon, I'm going to change my vote to "delete." --El Destructeso 01:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
delete just delete it please.--Shas'O'my'gosh 12:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Dilate from A to Horsium edit history shows the article has been developed throughout the last year, but lately only by an IP. And we all know what that means! Oh, and I added the dreaded template-- di Mario 22:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Smells like teen vanity, too.----OEJ 02:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. I smell the vanity, and it smells real bad. --GeneralInsineratehymn 19:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. that hurt my glasseyes. --User:Joakimlinde/sig 19:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Oops that was the wrong link. I'll Change it.--Shas'O'my'gosh 21:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep and open it as a Community Renovation Project. Someone added the blues names Mute Tomato Reagan and OCD Prune Coolidge, and the sample blues lyrics about the iPod and Enron. So we can make it better! All we have to do is change all the plagiarized jokes to original ones. We can do it. We are that smart!----OEJ 02:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC) --eh, comment, I have revised a little bit and put unrevised, plagiarized material in blue font. ----OEJ 03:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep OEJ's determination to fix it has inspired me. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 23:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Me too.--Shas'O'my'gosh 02:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Has enough work to keep it original, even though the basis isn't Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
Delete it almost kills me to do this, because it's so funny, but the whole thing is copied from a different website. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 06:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Deleteiate.plagarism. Lemon. 20:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Agree and huff It is funny, but someone else thought of it first. Uncyc should respect other peoples copyrights, I believe it is in the magna charta somewhere. Nice work though...-- di Mario 21:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
BURNINATE! Extremely funny, though 100 percent plagarized.--Shas'O'my'gosh 21:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Wow, a community rewrite. How inspiring. Lemon. 17:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete It is short and has no jokes. --Alksub 01:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete I agree. --Shas'O'my'gosh 05:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete I looked at the edit history and it has exactly three edits, starting december 2005. Apparently, the author(s) didn't care very much about this one... -- di Mario 20:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
This article is in kind of a predicament. It could be funnier, but I have no idea how. The list wasn't very funny, but the basic idea of the article was. Although I'm kind of leaning towards deletion, I think you should give this article a chance. It is a stub, though... --El Destructeso 02:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
keep we had a similiar thing on the uncyc #chan and it was actually QDB'd [[2]], so people do find this sort of thing funny. I do. -- di Mario 21:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Why has this happened? Lemon. 21:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Huff Quick! Call the Thought Police!--Shas'O'my'gosh 05:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
It's not needed. --—Braydie 20:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Just another version of the Snakes on a Plane sequels, without the funny. --Imp88 10:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - I will admit that some of the movies, like Beavis and Borat do America or Kill Borat are kind of funny, but overall it's repetitive and annoying. --El Destructeso 02:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
My hidden shame is I can't vote to kill pages that mention "furiously masturbating". I guess it's not all that hidden anymore. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Let it be. Needs work, but has potential. Lemon. 21:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
week keap. It has been there since june 2005, why huff it now ? -- di Mario 21:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
k33p - You have to cut this guy some slack. He's doing the best he can. Also, I like the Great Fire of London part. That was funny. --El Destructeso 02:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Add a picture or something. The text is fine. Prolix 21:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete. Incoherent and unfunny. --Jesusforaday 15:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak Delete. Suppose it has got a bit of potential, just not a lot.--Shas'O'my'gosh 05:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Hold on: I've expanded the article a bit. If you've already made up your mind, please reread the article before voting. --Alksub 20:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny, maybe vanity. --Jesusforaday 15:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
A random paragraph and two lists. Why bother? --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Nonsense that doesn't even attempt to be funny. --Imp88 10:29, 9 December 2006
Really bad, and we don't need the entry. Delete--Shas'O'my'gosh 12:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Huff I don't even know what this article is about.. not written well at all, and as Modus said, it's just a paragraph and some lists. --—Braydie 20:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
meh Whatever. -- di Mario 21:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
qualified keep. If you are going to huff this page, then you should also delete Ice_Cream_Flavors_Not_in_the_Top_100 which exploits pretty much the same idea. -- di Mario 21:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete It's just a list. --—Braydie 12:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Response to di Mario The difference between this and Ice_Cream_Flavors_Not_in_the_Top_100 is that stankee candles does not give any form of description to their different candles, while Ice Cream Flavors does.
Despite the unfortunal gaffe of talking about things that haven't happened yet, this is an oddity that I don't mind.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep The premisse is rather original (I am a sucker for time travel stories). Maybe the execution will improve as time goes by...You must remember this, a kiss is still a kiss, a sigh is but a sigh, the ordinary things apply, as time...goes...by! Of all of the gin joints and she had to walk into mine. Hit it Stevie (Sorry, Carli Simon on the stereo over here) -- di Mario 20:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
*Delete Not funny at all Prolix 08:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Lacks sense. ----OEJ 13:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! No. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 14:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hufff and Pough It rambles way too many and looks like a certain Dutchman making his way home after the pub closed... -- di Mario 19:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Classic randumb.----OEJ 13:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment - And an In-joke! --AAA! (AAAA) 08:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I can't believe the lemon is trying to delete your mom. Keep.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 08:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep but it needs saving. Save it! --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 14:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Extremely strong KEEP It is entirely true what Smartiblartfast writes: this is a classic and there are at least 500 articles linking to it. You would have to be Bat Fuck Insane to put this on VFD. Oh wait, it was Lemon. Huh? Gronk? She's not Bat Fuck Insane! WTF ?! -- di Mario 19:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Not only is this shit, but I'd hazard to guess that over half of it is stolen shit. Lemon. 07:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
KILL It's piss poor and not funny. At the very least, it needs the steady hand of an editor who is NOT a chronic masturbator. --DarthFredd 06:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Jesus, didn't realize this was such a fan favorite. Sorry. Lemon. 22:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
You know when a friend tells a joke, then you don't laugh, and he says, "You had to be there."? This is one of those.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I hate to present this in so crude a manner, but your mom actually was fabulous. And before you start to snigger, your mom was fabulous too. Man the way she reacted to those handcuffs...grade A material. And I have it all on tape... -- di Mario 22:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
There are people who know what this page says. I am not one of those people. So I'll have to render my vote based on the fact that it's formatted real purdy-like. Maybe a pic would help teach me what an Alien Swarm is.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep A lot of work has gone into this page, and it is not that bad. -- di Mario 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete It's like an unholy orgy of shitty, one line sections. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 01:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. I agree.----OEJ 01:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
An unholy orgy of shitty, one line sections is actually more fun than this. This sucks. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 02:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Flag for rewrite. Not that I enjoy it, but I think the entry is needed. Although... Christ, this does suck. Lemon. 07:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Was ICU-tagged about a month ago; the anonymous author removed the tag a few days later without otherwise changing it. --The Divine Fluffalizer - [tm] 20:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Egads -- teh bad. ----OEJ 01:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
<non sequitur>Oh...my...god. Siouxsie Sioux is almost fifty!</non sequitur> --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
di Lite This article is full of deliberate untruths! It will look bad for our reputation if this one ever gets out. -- di Mario 18:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
