This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.
Delete. The actual article, which was very underdeveloped, was damaged by Andreus' addition of the idiotic and cruftilaceous paragraph of GNAA repetitions. ----OEJ 15:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Dilithium and normal matter, confined in the same space at the same time. <-- This is what should happen to it. No redeeming value whateverseau. -- di Mario 19:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak for At least it has been researched somewhat. Plus I like the graphic. -- di Mario 19:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep but expand: The article has a good concept. It's somewhat consistent, it has a few chemistry/decoration crossover jokes, it just isn't very well-expanded. I think it's possible to put more in it, somehow. Knocking out the last bit with the rifles would be a good start. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 22:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Actually kind of funny, just needs help. --SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 01:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep it does need help, and the joke is there, if not obvious on first sight of the title, you get it as you read the rest of the page.--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 02:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
It's not crap. That opening paragraph is pretty good, actually. Plant humour...who'da thought?--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Ja. I always follow the crowd. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 02:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Needs more about being a warrior and fad, less the other stuff. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Give the author a fair chance. The article has been there for less than 48 hrs and is constantly being worked on by the author and others. Vide as per edit history. I think this is a promising n00b and you lot should not shy him away. User:Guest, I require of you to make an apology to the author and aid him into become Uncycs next Noob-of-the-month. -- di Mario 19:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Not overly repulsive. Needs a lot of work, granted, but worth keeping, methinks. -- HindleyiteConverse 19:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Sucks, I don't know how I could possibly miss it during FFW never mind, it was created yesterday. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 17:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
In all fairness, it is on Pee Review. Not sure about intent, though.----OEJ 18:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge into Geek. Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
*Merge into Geek.--Winston 11:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
keep Not seeing anything wrong with it, there's way worse stuff around here.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge Although basically this article is a list of lists (LoL), there are some funny parts. And by the way, is there some such thing as a serial geek ? -- di Mario 18:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
An example of how repeating a joke that was funny when SNL did over and over and over again ad nausiem is not freaking funny. --SirZombiebaron 03:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
it's just not funny...and way too cliche (con acento!)
--Cjagahatshi 04:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. I like it. And silly ministers have good comedic precedent; my local paper referred to the Ministry of Silly Walks just recently. Not to mention the Shadow Minister for Not Listening to People. Needs pictures, though.----OEJ 16:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete - Stupid, not funny, and people were littering this with goatse and tubgirl links (which I've removed [1]). --AAA! (AAAA) 04:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Unfunny. --Mitch 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Kill it --GeneralInsineratehymn 16:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Parodying Python is like trying to pin Julia Childs in a wrestling match.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 04:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Oh! Python as in Monty! At first I thought Python as that Perl wannabe marvelous scripting language created by some fellow Dutchman. Talk about gawky. Aaawrk! Polly want a cracker. -- di Mario 18:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, not as in Pirate the Python compiler for Parrot...what? The "real" world just went all surrealistic on me. Ouch, that smarts.----OEJ 02:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey, that's Dutchiness for you. All my days are like that... -- di Mario 21:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Should be QFVDed instead. It was never funny indeed, but it was severely vandalized with CTRL+V by some moron that turned it into a serious piece. I hope the trend does not catch on. herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 22:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Probable copyvio as stated above; tagging accordingly. Pentium5dot1 20:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
It's tough going against the author...but this isn't crap. Granted, I'm not a SpaceTrek geek, but this isn't awful.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
keep It is in fact very funny. -- di Mario 11:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Few get help in pee review, so being ignored there is not a reflection on your article.--Winston 11:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep I don't see why you think this sucks. Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
Delete. It didn't seem to work at all. I tried to get a Peer Review, but nothing came of it. Perhaps someone else can make something better out of it. --Lenin & McCarthy 23:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. It's not really in the style of Gul Dukat. And even if it were, you wouldn't be able to tell (I think). Alksub 08:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
This is merely an inside joke (if you could call it that) about Dota. While I play Dota, it's a) kinda/no it's actually very retarded and b) it makes really no uncyclopedic sense whatsoever. It also has too many facts. Railcgun (timestamp AWOL)
Burninate it. —HinoaKUN(talk) 17:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
frituurstaaf I hate inside jokes. I'm allways the butt of them. - di Mario 19:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. I am not insider enough to get the joke, but with regards to technique the article is very very bad.----OEJ 02:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep this is a work of art, you great unwashed :) -- di Mario 19:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. What's next? The cabal dictates how many userboxes one can link to their page? Or how many images? Unless a user has subpages teeming with porn or hate literature, give them some room to enjoy themselves.--Winston 11:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Let him do what he wants with his subpages. •Spang•☃•talk• 09:32, 5 Dec 2006
Hold up. If he wants to create an UnPoetia project (like UnBooks), then why don't we punt that into the open? —HinoaKUN(talk) 17:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
The problem is quality control. I suggest he or she be given a deadline to have it worthy of the main space or becoming an actual sub project, and if it isn't, then wipe. While I think subpages should generally be respected, I think this has too much of a potential for abuse as it exists now.
The purpose of subpages should be the development of material for Uncyclopedia, not for some other purpose, as this appears to be. The simple fact of it is that Uncyclopedia is a humor site, not a webhost, and an extensive network of subpages that is intended to stand alone, rather than be a scratch area for the purpose of drafting material for the main space, creates a balkanized website within Uncyclopedia that is not part of Uncyclopedia, and would not have the same quality or rationale as Uncyclopedia.
As the Benson supporters would say, this should probably be removed from our holy lands, but in the practice of believing in the user's good faith, he or she should be given time to improve the content so as to perhaps make it an actual subproject or namespace here instead of just a network of userpage subpages. At the very least, time to backup the code should be permitted before huffing. --Hrodulf 19:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Weird...I parodied people filling their userpage with non-Uncyc stuff as a bit in a recent UnNews article. No, I'm not going to name the article, that would be whoring. It's an odd coincidence, that's all.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For some reason, I would accept comments 1 and 3, which is obvious. Actually, UnLyrics (renamed UnPoetia for no reason) was started by Anidnmeno, altough I don't think that you'll find anything from his original User Page --SirGeneralMinisterG5FIYCUPotM[Y]#21 F@HKUN
Keep - I like it. Why would you VFD this in the first place? "Wee" is a funny word. Makes me laugh. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 23:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. (1) It's definitely made up, and I know because, well, I'm the one who made it up, and (2) The joke is that the whole article has a double-meaning (and it's not "Wee" replaced with "Wii"). On the one hand (pun intended), it can be: an innuendo-filled warning against masturbation, and on the other hand (pun still intended) it can be just what it says on the tin: a literal warning against "playing with your Wii" (ie. the game) too much... which is why all of the "warnings" are worded so carefully (so that both meanings are preserved). --cScott (talk • log)KUNPIENSFP 08:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep, I agree, it's not the usual pun with this console name, I have even wrote one with this kind of pun. This is a lot cleverer than mine. --—Braydie 09:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep: Obvious and well-expected pun mixed with a parody of a real-world news article warning about overplaying the Wii due to the fact that it actually requires you to move more than your thumbs. It's hard to come up with something better suited for UnNews. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 01:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. It's a fine article.--Winston 11:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
This is an article that isn't made up, Just a true article with "Wee" replaced with "Wii" --NXWave 06:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Obviously, the author has put a lot of effort in it and some parts are actually satirical. Man. look at the artwork! Perhaps if others started to mess with this one, it might one day even make VFH! -- di Mario 19:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep It's not hilarious, but it's still pretty good. Prolix 06:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep This article has a lot of potential for redeeming value. The images were time consuming and a lot of hard work was put into this to let people enjoy it. Please do not delete this article. We can edit it some if needed. Keener 11:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep I spent quite a bit of time on the article and it isn't just pointless drivel. Sure it doesn't have the polish that an VFH article could but it's not pointless. If anyone wants to put suggestions on the talk page then they can help to improve the article than just try and delete it. Master Fuzz 1:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep - But add {{Rewrite}} to it. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
I rarely submit articles, but I figured I'd better check to see if anyone knew wtf was up with this article. I see no point nor value to this article. Anyone have a counter to this opinion? SirFamine,Gun♣Petition»12/1 03:06
Holy Vanity page! The creator's image contributions indicate either a predisposition for 'chopping himself into pics, or he really loves that guy.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Move to user subpage.--Winston 11:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment That won't work, because the creator of the page is 216.70.249.98 (an IP). Should we have a vote to see who gets to keep it? --AAA! (AAAA) 01:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
tentative according to one of the authors on the articles talk page, This is an okay concept, I'm going to "fix" it Prolix 04:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC) I think this is an OK concept too. -- di Mario 19:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Tentative I'll do what I can with it, for a guy who sucks at writing articles. Prolix 07:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
GLEE!. For one, it's short, but it's good. And there are pipe-links!--Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 07:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Take it down I'm not even going to defend it. My article sucked and I'll admit it. --{Talk to me}Lovebones{Contributions} 19:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Confused or not, it's a Userpage...and there are much worse--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 14:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep. A userpage should not be judged as an article, for the plain and alimentary and simple reason that it isn't an article. Mind you, as Mowgli notes this user has not contributed anything except his user page...er, so does just any old riff-raff who registers get a userpage? ----OEJ 03:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete
-- don't know what to make of this page? the user has zero contributions to "main" -- mowgli 11:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Undecided I've looked around a bit on the authors website and my impression is that he created this user page while under the impression that Uncyclopaedia is a serious yet maybe not mainstream blog. I'll leave a message on his talk page. -- di Mario 19:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
tentative. Somewhere in the edit history there is a User:LeeHarveyKennedy, who as you may not be aware has four (coun't 'm) VFH's on his CV. Apparently, he didn't feel it necessary to VFD this article. Although I must concur that presently, 't aint much. -- di Mario 18:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
-- either a vanity page or else nonsense. -- mowgli 07:51, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete. I can't find a reference to a notable person named Aparna Kher, so I suspect a vanity article. LeeHarveyKennedy notwithstanding this does not appear to be a solid subject.----OEJ 03:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Crap. --Mitch 16:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Undecided Seems like a rather run-of-the-mill article, quality-wise. I've read worse. If it turns out this was made by a 10-year old, I might even give some praise to the author just for encouragement. -- di Mario 18:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Sucks pigdick. It lacks a Wikipedia article, and hasn't been edited into anything. --UNKNOWNFILE 01:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. I cannot decide. The idea is funny in itself, and the execution ... a bit short but doesn't deserve expletive swearwords in describing it. -- di Mario 18:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
This page is here as a subpage of Ninja because that page keeps getting filled with an unfunny list of people. This is the garbage-can of the Ninja article. I designed it that way, and it needs to stay. If you don't like it, don't click on the link. I have no remorse for banning users who add unfunny lists of people to the Ninja article when a specific page for it exits. It's like a honey-pot for asinine users. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition»11/27 23:41
Hold it right there! I realise it's a bit meagre, but I see some potential. Also, the work was originally started in april, 2005, and has been revisited by several parties on a regular schedule. Obvously, this is not a one-off abandoned piece of crap. Someone ask the original author(s) to expand a bit, add some images, and hey presto, a star is bourne. -- di Mario 20:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep. The article is uneven but substantial and has funny bits. The Hitler pic captioned "Ach mein Gott im Himmel! Zere is no 'Any Key', just press one ov zee buttons, dumbkopf!!!" is great.----OEJ 20:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Please hold onto this article Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep. I did a stint in Hell Desk and it's all TRUE! I remember it fondly in retrospection. Makes you wonder where I am nowadays, eh ? -- di Mario 10:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For worth a chance. --SirZombiebaron 18:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
keep. what's this doing on vfd - jack mort |cunt| talk - 18:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep...but clean it up. --Hhamdy283 03:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Sadly, I didn't notice this page during the FFW, because otherwise I would have huffed it with no regrets. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 19:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Merge with Hyperlink. We can expand that page that way. --Micoolio101 07:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Merge indeed. Invite some of the authors (I see Zombie Baron and Splaka amongst them) to merge as per the above. -- di Mario 10:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Merger Although I have no clue what di is talking about (and my name is one word! With a lowercase b!) --SirZombiebaron 06:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I thought I saw entries by Zombiebaron in the edit history. I looked at it again just now and apparently are mistaken, because in fact it's not on it. My most sincere apology, kind Sir. -- di Mario 10:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Acctually I did edit it, but I didn't "write it" - 20:33, 25 October 2006 Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) (revert link spam linked wrong) --SirZombiebaron 18:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep Deleting this would leave Page with no links shipwrecked. Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
We have a gazillion articles like this one, and this is not the best one. - Sir Sikon[formerly known as Guest] 07:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Dilate! this looks like a group effort executed by several sockpuppets fitting around the same hand at different times -- di Mario 10:04, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Moo its like every article I ever wrote, before the spell check. --SirZombiebaron 06:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep, just funny all around, this is just the kind of article that does NOT need to be put up for deletion. Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
meh. I've seen worse with these sad puppy eyes of mine. -- di Mario 15:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Abstain. Lacks writing style, but the main idea is interesting. Someone could add some elegance to the text (someone... where's that guy?). herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 18:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I am wierd and Hardeehar is weird. But insulting Barbara Streisand and Albert Einstein in the same article automatically condems it. Delete I say -- di Mario 15:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Blatantly anti-semitic. Get rid of it. --GeneralInsineratehymn 07:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Nah ahh, You're weird. Hardeehar 04:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Dead end. It's not so awful. The article has so-so nonsensical humor, but were you would link this stuff? herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 18:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Worthy topic, low-quality article.----OEJ 00:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
DeleteLife is a cellular automaton and life sucks. No but seriously, indeed: worthy subject, shoddy execution. -- di Mario 15:33, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
It's a shell of it's former self. Revert. Neoliminal 04:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Never mind, delete it. Neoliminal 04:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
what's there is fine it's just at least 5 times too short. neoliminal, move it to your userspace and carry on working on it - jack mort |cunt| talk - 18:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep I've done some of those things when I was 13 and remember them fondly. It is a nice article. -- di Mario 15:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep Best Buy! Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Strong Keep More like UN:VFH. I laughed so hard I cried. --Goshzilla 02:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep Well we need SOMETHING here that mentions Best Buy, lol. --RedPooka 05:08, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
KEEP!!!! as per Goshzilla. --Weatherman1126 06:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep Just needs to be listised. Alksub 07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete: Looks like someone mistook "parody of an encyclopedia" to be "my Geocities funny joke page lolz". I would've listed this for Forest Fire Week, but I was feeling generous. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 06:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
AAAARGH! this sucks. no, yuochat 13:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
delete. just not funny - jack mort |cunt| talk - 18:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
This could be the root of many vanity pages, and seems to be about a non-notable college football player--Nytrospawn 04:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete: This could've wound up as a somewhat funny idea for an article on Zachary Taylor, former US President, but instead it looks like a badly-formatted, linkless, vanity page dump. --CaptainSpamMUNPUTPBAA 06:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
even if it's not vanity it's still not anyone notable, and even if he is notable and i'm just ignorant, it's still not funny - jack mort |cunt| talk - 18:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I added the VFD template today. Other than that, I'm impartial -- di Mario 15:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete I'm putting this here despite forest fire week because I don't get the joak at all -- the "article" is nothing but The Walrus and the Carpenter by Lewis "Opium Pipe" Carroll. Can anyone explain why this is an "article"?----OEJ 23:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep - While the idea is a bit like ED humor, it's actually not a bad article. Definitely not worth a delete, but could use some improvement. Sometimes things don't get that much attention in the Pee Review. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 22:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep My only criticism is that the (to be arranged) section is a bit aimless. It needs to be REORG'D. Alksub 05:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep I just finished my first article and hey, it's hard work!. Give the man a chance -- di Mario 15:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
i say keep, but not by much - jack mort |cunt| talk - 18:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
I put this on Pee review awhile back and got no bites. It's a fairly lame subject and I would like to either hear that other people want it to stay (and finalize the ending) or dynamite the article and sink it. What thinky, chums?
Alksub, on the Pee review thing I asked which of the endings was best, intending of course to finalize that ending and delete the others. But then this article became not so much a frigate-bird as an albatross.----OEJ 15:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
OK, so people seem to think the article is OK. What I'll do is use Ending #3 and do a fairly large rewrite overall, maybe come up with some fresh inspiration along the way. Thanks. ----OEJ 18:41, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
I think, with the proper modifications, this could be a good article--Nytrospawn 03:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I think if you are willing to do those mods, it could be a good page. If not, it will probably continue to suck.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Short, uninteresting, non-contentful.----OEJ 15:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete Way too short, and every other word is a link. Hurts the eyes. The concept is worthwile, but the execution sucks. -- di Mario 15:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep. The introduction about watermellons is very long and messed and needs to be thinned. But Christina Aguillera as a dictator is very appealing to me - I almost thought I was reading Wikipedia. Alas, I think Christina Aguillera is a damn serious option when compared to Lula or Chaves. herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 02:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Painful!. This article really sucks!! Maybe the worst country article I've read--Styago 01:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
It would be best to start from scratch; the beginning is a mess and the end is a list.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
I just made a mistake while writing on the Search to create the article. "Geese Howerd" instead of "Geese Howard". Dumb move. But happens. - Alca Vicius
Delete. Utter crap. A comment in the history says something about it being part of a series, but the "What links here" pages disagree. --Gnome …MUNF@H 23:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Press 1 to delete--Winston 11:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Actually a candidate for QVfD, but it never made it there.... As no users with superpowers answered on IRC, I guess that's the way it's supposed to be done. --Gnome …MUNF@H 01:19, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Burn under Protocol 1.01 and 9.0.--Jtaylor1 03:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing much.----OEJ 16:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
It's a real football team, but it should still be deleted. -- Hindleyite 16:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Pretty dumb. If every soccer addict have to write articles about other teams than his team like this, better we don't have any article about soccer teams. herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 19:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep. I like international articles if only because articles of interest to Yanks and Pommies dominate Uncyc. I will take responsibility for a top-to-bottom rewrite and de-uglification. Pls check back and re-evaluate the ardickle, should take only a few minutes from the timestamp on my sig...----OEJ 16:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep OEJ's rewritten version.--Winston 11:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
This could improve with some work, but as we all know, that rarely ever happens. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 23:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
OK, I cleaned up Rita Verdunk -- I mean the article on Rita Verdunk -- as much as I am able. Please, Your Highnesses, review and see if it is still deletion-worthy.----OEJ 18:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I created "category:Unpersons" and I would have no problem with merging the two. Hell, just say the word, and I'll do the legwork myself. Mr36 03:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, go on then. -- 13:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Done, yo. Though some miscreant keeps adding the stuff back. Mr36 20:57, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Taken care of. —HinoaKUN(talk) 21:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep it. Cox [[2]] is as real person, a computer hippie. It's not vanity and I will always support mockery on Linux enthusiasts. herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 19:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete - Stubby, and probably vanity. --Micoolio101(whine • vandalism) 05:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
It's not vanity, but it's crappy none the less. --Gnome …MUNF@H 05:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Huffity huff huff. -- 11:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
meh. Sure it's not vanity, but it's not good either. Hasn't been really edited since april, so I don't think it's going to get better either. --Anyone 20:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
lol that map be funee --Redribbbon 21:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Embryonic political satire. Needs expansion but the idea -- a full-bore, completely democratic government -- is sound.----OEJ 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep. This one has potential to turn into a nice piece of conservative humour. herrdoktorneedsApistol[scream!] 19:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Nice map, put it somewhere worthwhile. -- 13:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
In the USA the current Republican argument for dissing democratically elected governments they don't like is that "democracy doesn't mean free and fair elections, it means elections in which the people the USA favors always win." So the article to hand -- a satiric exploration of the meaning of democracy -- is timely and relevant. Though it desperately needs revision and expansion.----OEJ 18:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
You're right about one thing--that it does need improvement. But the same can be said about every article anybody puts on VFD. They all need improvement. Now some articles which have seen traffic recently might actually get edited and improve some day. Other articles which have a good concept or theme going for them also might see improvement. But articles about a fly shaped island in the Mediterranean sea have little chance of that happening. VFD is the place for getting rid of articles that suck at the moment, and have a low chance of getting better. We can all sit here and say something just needs to get better, but most of the time it simply won't happen. --Anyone 15:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I'd added a small section. In any event, I think we should improve this rather than delete it (possibly also consider changing the name to CERN since that's what it is trying to make fun) --—The preceding unsigned comment was added byJoshuaZ (talk • contribs)
Delete
wtf? Stupid, randumb dumbness. But if it was Superconducting Super Colander then there might be something. I just don't think Uncyc has enough articles about tools for straining vegetables. --Anyone 22:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
No, sorry Memes do not funny make. It has potential for a wiki sprok of LHC (no wait we have one of those.) Kill. no, yuochat 13:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
An article on CERN would be a nice idea, but it's unlikely to get expanded unless someone who's already worked on it does it. JoshuaZ, your cue. -- 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
hmmm again. Sure, it's not crap. But what's there is not all that great either, and certainly not keep-worthy. To all those who might say it only needs work -- It hasn't been edited since May, and even that was only an IP. So as much as it might seem like a keeper, do the right thing - set it free! --Anyone 22:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Strange it survived that long without being tagged with anything.... --Gnome …MUNF@H 22:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Burn in hell.--Jtaylor1 03:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Crap. Might be well hidden vanity (note the birthdays and it was created on august 3) but it's hard to say. Regardless, it's crap. --Anyone 21:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. --Gnome …MUNF@H 21:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Will see if I can add to this. The bit about fine "sediment distribution" is priceless. Perhaps you don't know of this beverage? SirFamine,Gun♣Petition»11/11 17:05
Famine say keep. Monkey see, monkey do. -- 13:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
