Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive46

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Diurtle

Keep
Delete
  • hmmm. The convo isn't half bad, but it's a stupid topic and a stupid article, and this is not the place to save your aim conversations with your friends while you were drunk that one time.
  • Yes, that's the wrong place to save you logs. Delete. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 21:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Toothpaste tube paradox

Keep
Delete
  • Bat Shit Insane. And hasn't been touched in almost a year. --Anyone 21:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This guy has no idea of physics; the mass does not have any influence on the falling speed.... --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 21:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn under UDP 9.0--Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Bonnie Tyler

Keep
Delete
  • No. Also, Mhaille has edited it, which is reason enough to delete anything. --Anyone 21:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Absolutely. Mhaille is grounds for deletion. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it's not Mhaille's fault, but short & unfunny. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 22:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Smells like slandity.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Alekhine's Defence

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • If this makes any sense to anyone, I apologise. -- Paw_print.jpg 11:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Deadwarrior

Keep
Delete
  • Smells Brazilian. Some internal jokes in Portuguese, probally some kind of naïf vanity. Maybe we could create a template featuring a picture of a pair of peacock-dressed buttocks saying: this article is too much Brazilian. Fuck bush fuck USA add me pls orkut rox. herr doktor needsAcell Rocket [scream!] 17:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • You sir suck the penis. And furthermore, enjoy it. --Anyone 21:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It does smell like vanity to me, maybe from WoW or something. Delete. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 21:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Vanity? Not sure. Written by an IP. -- Paw_print.jpg 11:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Stim stim

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • De-uglified it originally in the hope that the author would make it better. They haven't. Tis a piece of carp. -- Paw_print.jpg 00:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Hmmm...do I smell an article called Stm stm in the near future? I hope not. --Sir Zombiebaron 00:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Non-Jimbo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)21:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Starr Jones

Keep

Awww, it's kind of cute. Keepy It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete
  • WTF is this shit. Smashy!Hinoa KUN (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • ARGAH! --Sir Zombiebaron 00:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Ugh. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 21:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • per you guys --Anyone 21:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Blaaaaaaargh! It suck big time! --General Insineratehymn 22:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat

Keep
Delete
  • meh. --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 13:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Murder the article in its sleepIt's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff it. Pure poetry... needAbrain BrainSign [babble] 14:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Devolve it, oh and next time please add {{vfd}} to pages that you nominate, whoever nominted this. --Sir Zombiebaron 01:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yep. And for the love of god NeedABrain, fix your sig!-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 11:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. That article, I mean. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 21:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Already got 6 But just to make sure it goes away... --Anyone 21:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Zombie-Nation.net

Keep
Delete
  • Looks "like" vanity shite to "me". --Sir Zombiebaron 03:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It is vanity shite. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 07:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Zombie Vicious

Keep
Delete
  • RRRRROOOOAAAAARRRRR --Sir Zombiebaron 02:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • UUUUUGHAAAAGGGGGHAH --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • AAUUUUGH!AUUUUUUUGH --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 07:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Cowboy Bebop deserves better.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Or how about zombie vicious vs regular vicious cagematch? Kill.It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • well, kinda but not because cowboy bebop deserves better. --Anyone 21:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Jesus vs Zombie Jesus Cage Match

Keep
  • Boooooddddy and bloooooooood. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Braaaaaaaaaainnnnnnnsssssss. --Sir Zombiebaron 02:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Heeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaartsssss. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Lllliivvveeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrr. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 07:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Sssppppllllleeeeeeeeeennnnn. --Onion 20:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • wtf? is going on here? --Anyone 21:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Fucking Motherfucker

Keep
  • Keep. Its better than nothing. Dois 12:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Dois
  • Keep. This could be the next fucking AAAAAAAAA!, motherfuckers. Fuck, it could fuckin' fuck the fucking world! Goshzilla 21:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. Little more than a swear-a-thon as far as I can see. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 11:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • You Fucking Motherfucker! You Fucking Motherfucker! Fuck you! Fuck you! Fuck, fuck, fuck fuck! Spang talk 11:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • What the fuck was that fucking piece of fucking fuck? Who the fuck? WHY the fuck?! Fuck the fucking fuckers, you fucking fuck! Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • frigg. I mean fudge. --Anyone 21:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
  • What the fucking fuck is this motherfucking piece of fucking shit fucking doing here on fucking Uncyclopedia!? Who the fucking fuck was the fucking motherfucker who fucking thought of this motherfucking piece of fucking shit!? --General Insineratehymn 22:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

I have a feeling that this is where the title came from, but the article sucks, compared to how awesome that song is. Spang talk 11:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Another Referrence to Terrance and Phillip.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 19:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


Happy Kitty

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - Random, short, weird, and the non-relating images screw up the article. Also, there's nothing about "Happy Kitties" anywhere. --Micoolio101 (whinevandalism) 03:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Either I missed the content between the swear words, or there is none. I tend toward the second option. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 11:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • NOT FUNNY. at all. ever. --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 12:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

James watson

Keep
Delete
  • Wow. This from October 24th. It smells of vanity something aweful. And they didn't even bother to use a capital letter for the last name. --Sir Zombiebaron 00:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Not vanity - he was the guy who did founding work on DNA, as the article indicates. It is, however, complete and utter, miscapitalized crap. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 11/7 01:10
  • Delete. Very, very feeble. needAbrain BrainSign [babble] 01:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Should have been QVFDed instead. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Short & unfunny. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 11:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Your Friend's Giraffe

Keep
  • Weak Keep See argument below Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Your Friend's Dad

Keep
  • Weak keep, seems these articles go as a set, together the repetiton is pretty funny by itself Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
Comments

Egyptianese Lessons

Keep
Delete
OOh...*blush* -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 13:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The Classical Period

Keep
  • Weak Keep. This would be better tagged with "expand" if anyone bothered about expanding articles. needAbrain BrainSign [babble] 00:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Eric Lindros

Keep
Delete
Comments

The day before The Day After Tomorrow

Keep
  • Weak keep I must be easily amused, or insane. Alksub 01:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. The hell?--Procopius 19:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Stupid. --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 22:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Technically known as tomorrow, my delete vote has never actually been celebrated. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • The day before the day after tomorrow? My God, that's... BALEETED Mrthejazz 21:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Mookey

Keep
Delete
Comments

Your Friend's Mom

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gone with the Wind

Keep
  • Keep Movie article with potential Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • much too short but not that rubbish, plenty of potential - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Needs expansion. Alksub 04:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • "Miss Scarlett (Played by Oprah Harpo 10029)". 'Nuff said. --Sir Zombiebaron 17:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It's absolutely terrible and should be abolished. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. If the subject is good then someone should start a new article from scratch. needAbrain BrainSign [babble] 21:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Gigli

Keep
Delete
  • Craptastical Movies Make Craptastical Articles. --Sir Zombiebaron 17:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • shitty - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Better than the movie.--Winston 15:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Kept; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


Andrea Dworkin

Keep
Delete
  • Horrible, unfunny and gratuitously cruel and stupid. Radical feminists are, ahem, fertile ground for satire, but this is just shit. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 03:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm afraid it's short and not funny at all. Alksub 03:57, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • shocker - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 04:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Short & unfunny --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 11:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Winston 15:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree with above posts. --Onion 20:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Ouch. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

The commander in chimp

Keep
  • Expand and improve.--Winston 15:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
    Are you going to expand and improve? If you don't, it won't...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Anti-Bush slander. Yawn. Get rid of it. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • aye - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 02:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • aye -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 03:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • If anything's here, it's overshadowed by the dozen other George Bush-related articles. Delete Alksub 03:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • aye --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 11:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • You'd figure something that started out as a Simpson's reference would end up better.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • These are all worn-out jokes. --Onion 20:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)23:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Jython

Keep
Delete
  • Has absolutely nothing to do with the truth. Unlike Java, let me point out. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • GOBBLE GOBBLE! --Sir Zombiebaron 18:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • kill - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 02:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Tries to go in too many directions at once. Boink it Alksub 04:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Too random.--Winston 15:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • My delete vote is a new and moderately popular Coffee-Powered Snake created in 1886 by Charles Babbages's 12 Double Dutch Nephews (twice removed). (from the Netherlands). --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Ruby on Rails

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Adrunka anTonic (advanced anTonic Drinking Habitats)

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Being cut off in the middle of a sentence

Keep
  • keep it, i actually quite like this. it does need expanding though, obviously - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 02:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - Strictly self-referential appeal Alksub 04:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep This is funny like how Dictation was, in the self-referential sense.--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 04:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Has potential --Onion 20:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Me too Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Actually pretty funny, and I'm someone with strict taste. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Kept; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


Sea Lord

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - I'm not even going to comment. --Micoolio101 (whinevandalism) 08:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 14:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I AM SEAMAN --Sir Zombiebaron 18:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Interesting topic, very poor article.----OEJ 18:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • yeah, the topic could stand up, this is drivel though - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Boink I don't like the 'headings as broken links' Alksub 04:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)19:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

How_to_avoid_confusing_grues_for_ravenous_bugblatter_beasts_of_Traal

Keep
Delete
  • --L 06:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • -\/\/úFf~BÃ|2K8ìtë 11:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unfunny grue articles. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 14:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • HORNK --Sir Zombiebaron 18:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • the idea of internet meme and hitch hikers' coliding isn't immediately awful, it's just the article - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Smite. --DW III CUNOUN 23:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Boink The RBBOT stuff is derivative Alksub 04:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)19:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Alf kid

Keep
Delete
  • Errrrrr... no. --DW III CUNOUN 03:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Too random, too incoherent, too misssplelled. ----OEJ 04:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • That's the kid from eBaum's World. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • KILL HARD - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • “Can't say I do.”
    ~ User:Alksub on whether he thinks this article should be kept
    04:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Urgh. -- Hindleyite 14:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)19:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Bavarian Order of the Spork

Keep
  • Its History Deleting this would be like deleting our oldest article! Just this one isn't quite that old. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • What is this? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Maybe a fossilized in-joke from the dark era of 2005?----OEJ 04:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Standards must've been a lot lower back in the day - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Boink Alksub 04:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • It was a different era... --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Carrot Theory - a NEW Theory of Everything

Keep
  • Keep. Whilst respectfully respecting those who don't like it, I think there are some good bits in this article. The long lists of possible dimensions and heretic theories need to go, but otherwise this seems an acceptable madness.----OEJ 04:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agree with One-eyed Jack. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 14:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep just the way it is. It's marvelous. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • stupid rather than bad, no worse than any of my stuff :| - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Just not unfunny. Alksub 04:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep-I even unfuglied a section while I was at it, this article just needs to be sexified.--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 04:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Moronic beyond belief. --DW III CUNOUN 02:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Kept; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Popunders

Keep
Delete
Comments

Wikipedia the Truth!

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:21, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Berserk

Keep
  • Keep I like stream of consciousness. !!!!. oh, I mean Alksub 04:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • It was a hot subject for magnificient montypithonian humour, but this crap of article is filled with just lowbrow geekish internal joking material. NeedABrain 22:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • i know the anime/manga this's about. it's an awful article but i do really like the voice it's written in. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 23:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.----OEJ 01:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Tomatocow

Keep
  • Keep I can't readily identify the vanity. Alksub 04:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Complete vanity, totally unfunny to boot. -- Hindleyite 17:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, yes it is.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Chop off his head, chop off his head! NeedABrain 22:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • KILL THE VANITY and also maybe add to CVP or something, because i'm sure i've seen this exact same article go through VFD at least once before, and i can't think of any article for tomatocow, apart from this self-promotion - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 23:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Uh, what the fuck? Delete. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:01, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

However, Tomatocow has some internet presence. There is no Wikipedia arduckle on tomatocow; there was a discussion of tomatocow (which I copied to my talk page for your constipation) in 2004. I watch the vote with interest and ambivalence.----OEJ 01:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

BrokenSpaceBarDisorder

Keep
  • Was ICU'd by a certain nameless person; methinks it's a keeper (more or less as is). --DW III CUNOUN 05:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, we need to keep, but throw in some jokes about unneccessary spaces, not just no spaces. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • Wouldneedtobeexpanded,ifsomeonecanbebotheredtodothatthenI'llchangemyvotetokeep,butuntilthen,it'stooshort. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • the self reference of an article about a broken spacebar written without spaces is good, but it's not enough on its own, the actually article needs to be good as well, and this isn't, it's toss - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 23:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The joke's mileage has already been expended in Space bar. Alksub 04:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The article is way short. It would be difficult to make this article longer, however, because nobody could slog through that much spaceless prose. Therefore this is about as good as it gets for the topic. But I personally do not vote "keep".----OEJ 01:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


Grapefruit seed extract

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Dammit...if not for the incoherent attempts at dialogue it might be salvageable. If salvageable was spelt that way and if the article was better, I suppose.----OEJ 00:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • bugger - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 01:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Shoot this gripefest already. --DW III CUNOUN 04:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The article sucks big time!!! Sorry!!!!! --The Class Clown 05:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with the authour...though I'm partial to the footnotes.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
CommentsI am the author of the sucky gimmick (grapefruit seed extract). The joke is on YOU for keeping the article up so long. This is actually the real joke. Ha. Ha. Ha. --The Class Clown 00:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Wow, with humour like that...<wanders away> --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Blessing word

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Probably a candidate for QVFD but it's survived for a year so I VFD'd it instead.----OEJ 00:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • drown - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 01:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Unfunny. -- Hindleyite 17:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Anticontranonantidisneopsudeoretrohypersesquipedalianism

Keep
Delete
  • Really short and unfunny. This word doesn't exist, by the way. --Onion 19:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I concur. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • huff - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Gah -- Hindleyite 21:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Survival of the fittest says this one should die.----OEJ 00:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Silence It SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 04:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Unanticontranonantidisneopsudeoretrohypersesquipedalianismed. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Getting busy

Keep
Delete
  • Year-old boring crassitude. --DW III CUNOUN 19:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Rogue Punchlines is far superior to this. --Onion 19:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • huff - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Malformed, crass, and incoherent to boot.----OEJ 01:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Just delete it -- Hindleyite 15:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Everyone knows it's bizay. Plus I agree with all the other "deleters" here.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:19, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

World of Warcraft

Keep
Delete
  • Delete and redirect to World of Whorecraft; it's a no good article and should point to something amusing. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • What Gwax said. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I 3rd the motion. --Onion 19:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment What if someone actually wants to make an article on Warcraft? Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
      • How about put it at Warcraft? --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
        • Actually, Warcraft is a different game. It's a strategy game, while WoW is a first-person chopper-upper -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 01:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • You'd figure a game this popular would generate a better page...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

I won't vote yea or nay...but does anyone else long for a bonfire concentrating on gaming articles?----OEJ 01:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Nah. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Ah well. Probably a personal perversion predicated on pathological poopheadedness, then.----OEJ 01:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
there is nothing wrong with game articles per se, but the majority of the ones we have are dire - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 23:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Smoggies

Keep
Delete

Delete. Short, irredeemable.--Procopius 13:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

  • shitties... hah......hahaha! i actually remember this cartoon, the article is an afront to it - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, I also remember the cartoon. It sucked, much like this article. -- Hindleyite 17:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Mastodon

Keep
  • it's rubbish, but i don't know if it's bad enough for deletion - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. I tried to get this. I really did.--Procopius 13:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
  • NOT FUNNY! can it. joke per minute = nil. --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 15:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments

United States Presidential Election of 2004

Keep
Delete

Delete. Mencken, O'Rourke, Trudeau -- yes, all of them would grab a baseball bat and beat this down.--Procopius 13:08, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Delete Stupid, not funny. Nullius in Verba 19:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments

DOTA

Keep
Delete
Comments

Fergie Jesus

Keep
Delete
Comments

Another unwanted Jesii bites the dust. --DW III CUNOUN 21:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Big red button

Keep
Delete
Comments

Birdie

Keep
Delete
  • Errr... huh? --DW III CUNOUN 04:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

CT

Keep
Delete
  • Smells like vanity, but what do I know? --DW III CUNOUN 03:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yep, smells like teen vanity.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • And here's me thinking that it would be a funny article on counter-strike. bleh. D to the LEET --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 11:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • even if it's not vanity it certainly is bollocks - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 12:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • What the Dickens? -- Hindleyite 16:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Article goes "bye-bye"! --DW III CUNOUN 16:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Passive voice

Keep-Uh, well, I wrote the article and noticed someone put VFD up on it sometime this evening. Really recently, in fact. Just a few minutes ago it looks like. Anyway- since they didn't make the deletion page, I figured I best do it. Though, naturally, I having written the article, I vote to keep it because it is made of pure awesome. Nullius in Verba 02:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • definitely keep. well written and funny - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 12:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. With a little more work it could be feature quality.--Procopius 15:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Misplaced VFD. -- Hindleyite 16:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Too factual.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:24, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Furry jesus

Keep
  • --Jtaylor1Small Egg 03:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • keep, even if only to irk the religious - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 12:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

John Basedow

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Good satire could be written about Basedow but this article is not it.----OEJ 01:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Bin it. Deletorious. --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 11:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • kill - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 12:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Not worth a comment -- Hindleyite 16:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Anti-matter

Keep
Delete
  • Random carp & we already have Antimatter. --DW III CUNOUN 00:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • yeah delete and put redirect to antimatter - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 12:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Deffo huff and redirect per Jack. -- Hindleyite 16:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Annihilated & redirected. --DW III CUNOUN 17:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Dawg

Keep
  • Keep But it's a starving skeleton of an article, expand tag it and commence to pimp this bitch like... never mind, I can't even pretend to be a DAWG. Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
This is my favourate word in English! -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 11:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Qwgcxkjo

Keep
Delete
Comments

Die in a fire

Keep
  • Keep. Needs expansion, but I like the idea of "die in a fire" being used in casual conversation. Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Keep Out of all the VFD-marked pages I've seen today, this one is the best. It's not bad at all. User:Lassaris
  • Keepsies. And anyone who disagrees can die in a fire themselves. I will admit it does need more cowbell, though... —Hinoa KUN (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep! It's got a lot of potential. I think it's pretty funny, and will get better with time. ~ Darkskul - 31 October 09:40
  • Keep --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 05:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments


Mr. Freeze

Keep
  • Keep. But stop talking about your damn teachers and revert the article! Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
  • Er, yes, delete. I didn't nominate this, but it can go. It's like Ulysses, only stupid and death-affirming.--Procopius 02:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -- I agree. Probably slandanity too.----OEJ 03:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Meh --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • rubbish - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 19:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

ZZT-OOP

Keep
  • The article's merits, right now, are dubious -- BUT, an admin tagged this as an expand article after the NRV tag expired, so I'd be willing to give this one a stay of execution. The original author has made some decent UnNews contributions, and I'd be willing to give him/her another chance.--Procopius 02:27, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's geekness is beyond me, I admit, but I'm siding with Procopius on this one, as it's not crap.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • it's like Command line except rubbish - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 14:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 10 Delete. 20 Goto 10. 30 end. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Good example of an article that is probably funny to 5 out of the world's 6,500,000,000 people.----OEJ 18:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Dunno why I never deleted it in the first place. Must have been going through a particularly extreme inclusionist phase. -- Hindleyite 18:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • >stab article That command was not recognized. Alksub 19:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yawn --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Angela

Keep
Delete
Comments


German poisoning

Keep
Delete
  • Dispose of. --DW III CUNOUN 00:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • THE!!!.... I mean DIE!!!SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 06:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's in 5 sections and is coherantly written, if you added a picture it would look like any featurable article, but it still wouidln't be remotely funny - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 13:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Nope -- Hindleyite 10:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Dictation

Keep
  • I hate to disagree with the creator of the page, but this is a good idea. It's a stub, granted, but it's not crap.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. got potential. And ban someone for not using the VFD tag :P -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I laughed. -- Hindleyite 18:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Back at it again, lad! Ye've almooost gut it, Aaadddaaammm! Jist add moor, an' ah swear ye'll have it!</Scotty>--Procopius 02:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I like the idea so much, I added to it!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN  Eh?  Oh!  UnTunes! CannabagreenI Card-spades-up my cat! 11:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hey, this is actually funny, why are you deleting it? I say keep it and bonk Aaadddaaammm on the head for pulling this stunt (or maybe it's a publicity stunt? O_o)--Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 01:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Wasn't nearly as funny as it sounded in my head, and noone would QVFD it. Please put it out of its misery. Aaadddaaammm 22:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, although as Aaadddaaammm might note the idea is possible if utterly transformed. ----OEJ 22:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • this isn't good but could be, i'd advise aaadddaaammm try rewriting it again in your userspace where you can take time over it, a dictated article on dictation has the potential to be very funny - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 13:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Takes a strong writtar to recommend his own stuff for the ax. I express admiration. ----OEJ 22:49, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Gooogle

Keep
Delete
Comments

List of weapons that exist, but shouldn't

Keep
Delete
Comments

Kept; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)19:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Really fucking witty, just trust me

Keep
Delete
  • Delete I found it uninteresting, short, and pointless. But others may feel otherwise.----OEJ 03:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. My faith was betrayed.--Procopius 03:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Please kill it. Thank you. Good night, and good luck. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • L 05:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • מה זה החרא הזה לכל הרוחות?!?!-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 11:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Not really that witty, just some crud about a clown -- Hindleyite 11:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • (cur) (last) 15:26, 8 June 2005 69.37.62.194 (Talk | block) (A Bad Joke) - I feel the same way, 69.37.62.194. --Keitei 11:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Quick Kill and lock the old fart up.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 11:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Pseudoscience

Keep
Delete
  • *earsbleed* - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 14:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. A bona fide member of the Short, the Bad, and the Ugly.----OEJ 18:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Flagellate until dead Alksub 19:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. But a new article has a good deal of potential to be funny.--Procopius 02:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • At first I thought it was bad, then the bit with "Chuck Norris Oprah Jesus Master Chief Grue Soviet Russia Oscar Wilde Elmo" clinched it.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • L 05:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Buddist Monks

Keep
Delete
  • So short...so not funny...--Sir Zombiebaron 14:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Old and randumb -- Hindleyite 14:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • immolate - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 14:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. "Scienificaly" proven unworthy.----OEJ 18:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • ...can't even spell buddhist correctly...or, there's a pun there that I'm not getting. Oh, and it sucks.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Good riddance to that. --DW III CUNOUN 23:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

2063

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Adds no intelligence to the universe. Entropy is bad enough without this article. ----OEJ 23:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Get rid. --DW III CUNOUN 00:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Djackl

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. From a quick Google Djackl appears only as an internet forum handle, and the article appears to be little more than slandanity against one of the users of that handle.----OEJ 00:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't think I have to look this up to see that it's stupidity about some unliked user... the Obvious point is that hes hasn't even returned to the page to edit it!!! CchristianTehWazzit
  • Euthanize. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • De-1337. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 07:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 12:51, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Shred. I guess most people don't know what a Djackl is (so do I). --Gnome Icons-balloon.pngSpacerIcons-bomb.pngSpacerIcons-flag-ch …MUN F@H 13:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • 03:32, 29 October 2006 Sikon huffed "Djackl": (SlowVFD)

How to vandalize wikipedia

Keep
  • don't delete it, it's still being edited and is work in progress. then when it's finished merge it with HowTo:Vandalize Wikipedia - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 22:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
  • There is no real argument for deletion... CchristianTehWazzit
  • Err, shouldn't be listed if its WIP and still within the 7 days. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Purty funny, and for once AT LEAST A FEW FUCKING PEOPLE AGREE! Mr. Briggs Inc. 03:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Don't kill me for the format, Eh?
Delete
Comments
  • I AM THE PERSON WRITING THIS. I think the person who put this here dosn't like me, I will adress the issues that are brought up in the Talk page for this. I don't think I can talk with Guest, he dosn't seem to want to listen... With much gay love: CchristianTehWazzit

Deleted, for a number of reasons. First, we don't encourage vandalism of Wikipedia. You'll note that the other page is not a useful vandalisation tool. Second, a similar page already exists. Third, you, CchristianTehWazzit, put instructions in it to vandalise an admin's page here, which is a big no-no, and puts you on shaky grounds with myself, and probably some other admins, and fourth, some of the exact code you list to vandalise Wikipedia has already been used to vandalise this site. And it only happened after it was added to the page. All in all, puts me in a banning mood... Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 29/10 14:39


Really? awesome...

But is there a way for me to get a copy of the article? Undrdoggs wanted to post it on thier website CchristianTehWazzit

GameFAQs/Random Insanity/Citizens

Keep
Delete
Comments

Soda-Time Continuum

Keep
Delete
Comments

Adam Ant

Keep
Delete
  • written by a mental - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 23:15, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Written by a Mental --Sir Zombiebaron 00:41, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I've known mentals that write more coherently. --Onion 01:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Adam ant is a fruitloop, but this is ripe for deletion-- no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 14:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Unplug the jukebox and do us all a favour.--Winston 23:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Calvin Klein

Keep
Delete
Comments

Famous Belgians

Keep
Delete
  • Rend I deleted a whole crap load of red links, but the left over is nothing. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • re-process into bureauocracy. besides, they missed out Tintin. --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 12:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • rubbish - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 18:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

How to Market Feces

Keep
  • The odd thing is, even though it's got feces in the title, and the text specifically says it's about shit; it's not about shit. This is marketing 101, selling stuff people don't need to people who don't need it. Make a note; I'm breaking my own rule about voting for shit with this one. Unfortunately with this title it'll never get improved; Onion (below) is on the right track.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. See above ^. --Hhamdy283 20:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't think we have an article on plain Demographics yet, so this is the closest we have. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Needs some improvement, but overall fine.--Redribbbon 22:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • With a title like that, how could we not feature it delete it? --Sir Zombiebaron 02:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Feces like this is what makes Uncyclopedia great. -- The Colonel (talk) 07:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • alright.When this article came here, it had a shitty title, a little bit of content and what content it did have wasn't funny. Now it has a shitless title and a fancy table, which is atleast grounds for keeping. I'm glad a few of you decided to "save" this article, but I just hope a few of the others on death row don't get jealous. --Anyone 14:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • not horrible - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 18:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete

*Yes. But not all defecation jokes are bad. Some are half decent. But not this one; no, this one is bad. --Anyone 16:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC) changed vote

Comments
  • If someone were to remove the scatalogical unhumor, this could be the start of a decent article about marketing. Possibly rename it to How To: Market or something of that nature. --Onion 15:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
    Marketing 101 is free. Just change "feces" in the text to "product", and you're gold.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
    I have made changes as suggested by Modus. I'll hold off on flagging the redirect for QVFD until the people have decided the article's fate. If it's kept, I'll contribute more to it. --Onion 01:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    I suggest we should add a few things about brand names, informercials and shiny packages, slam in a few pictures and get the article featured. However, I think the new title seriously lack the notion of uselessness and it fails to state clear of the central idea of the whole article. It is satire we are trying to make here and we don't want the title to pack any less punch than it used to. -- The Colonel (talk) 07:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    That's a good idea. After the article has improved significantly, I'll worry about a good title. At least now, an anonymous IP will have a harder time ruining it. If anyone has anymore suggestions, put it on the article's discussion page or my personal talk page. --Onion 12:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Cocteau Twins

Keep
Delete
Comments

Teddy Sheringham

Keep
Delete

(UTC)

Comments

Youranus

Keep
Delete
  • It's like 5th 8th ?th grade all over again, except less puberty this time (except I can't remember what grade that was). --Anyone 20:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • killkillkill - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 22:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 1st grade perhaps? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Just destroy. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This brings back memories of 6th grade. Bad ones. --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I concur. --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 12:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Polyphasic sleep

Keep
Delete
  • This belongs at Wikipedia. --Anyone 20:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Trekkiecruft disguised as a scientific topic -- Hindleyite 20:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I actually read the Wikipedia article on it. I've been doing this for years. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hit with a photon torpedo. --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

John Williams

Keep
Delete
  • I'm running out of original comments to make. --Anyone 20:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • kill - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Nice head morph, though. -- Hindleyite 20:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That was him in his 20's?!...Well, at least he kept his personality. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. (Insert movie reference here) --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Saab

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bleen time

Keep
Delete
  • More random crap. --Anyone 19:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • very kill - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Crush like a paper cup -- Hindleyite 20:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Directory of All Knowledge

Keep
Delete
  • Randumb stoopidity gawn amuck. --Anyone 19:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • kill. can't believe it's survived 11 months - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Nice concept. Crap article, though. -- Hindleyite 20:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It is about knowledge, yet it is stupid. Hmm... --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Die. --Meht 21:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Swiss army knife

Keep I wrote this article and Splarka added some stuff. I think it's fine. And so what if it hasn't been touched in over a year? Alright, it's not VFH but it's not VFD either. --Ogopogo 22:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Hasn't been touched in over a year, and doesn't do justice to the coolness that is a swiss army knife. --Anyone 19:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • the little table at the bottom amused me and an article on swiss army knives is an idea with a lot of potential, but this is no good - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 20:03, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Unless the author intends to expand it, Delete. --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments I've noticed that in various VFDs that he's started, User:Anyone is arguing VFD on the basis, in whole or in part, of lack of recent edit activity. That's not a basis. --Ogopogo 22:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
how about the fact that the article has only three sentences of content - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 22:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
So what? A lot of OK articles on this site have padding (to extend length) but don't really say more than could be said in three sentences. --Ogopogo 22:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 :| you think the articles on uncyc have three good lines and 5 paragraphs of padding? - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 22:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
I didn't say "all"; I said "a lot". In any case, the point is that you can't judge and jury based on length alone. --Ogopogo 22:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
True, quality over quantity, but both ideally. if you'd written the three best lines on uncyc then the shortnes would be ignorable but what you've written isn't good enough to excuse the fact that you can read the entire article between blinks - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 23:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Yawn. Anyway, I noticed that you got really outvoted on SPAM and Vancouver Grizzlies below. --Ogopogo 23:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Wow, I leave for a few hours and this happens? No, Ogopogo, I'm not using lack of recent activity as a basis for putting an article on VFD. I use lack of anything near content as a basis for putting an article on VFD. Any article I put here is one I deem "not good enough to stay." Articles that I deem "not good enough to stay" but have recent activity DO NOT GO HERE, because it's obvious the author is still working on them no matter how slowly. I use lack of recent activity as proof that an article isn't going to get any better than where it's at right now. Your swiss army knife article is "not good enough to stay" in my opinion, but it is only my opinion right now, hence the VOTE for deletion. If you planned on making it better, you would have; you had a whole year. But you didn't touch it and a sentence + a short list doesn't equal an article (unless there's some sort of joke behind it). And Jack Mort is still right, no matter how out voted he got below. He thought those articles wern't good enough to keep, and we're all entitled to our say. I love a democracy that works. --Anyone 04:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

$

Keep
Delete
  • Stupid idea + short + only reverts and minor edits in the past 3 months = VFD )--Anyone 19:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • gas - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 19:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, that's pretty stupid. --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Word. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Pastry

Keep
  • keep. i laughed twice! - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 19:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I've made a couple of the recipes. A bunch of times. Sigh.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • The last section is quite funny. Maybe this can be merged with something? --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Admittedly, this article is somewhat iffy. But it hasn't been touched in almost a year and is kind of random, so let's put it out of it's misery. --Anyone 19:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Cardboard boxes

Keep
Delete
  • Too old to be NRVd?, but still no content. kill it --no, yuo Tanks-12px chat 11:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • rubbish - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 18:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Bollards -- Hindleyite 18:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Just say "no" to wombat cock references. --Anyone 18:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Euthanize --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This page shows how hard it is to make a combination of homelessness and wombat cock sucking funny. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • What Modus said. It's about the only thing this article days accomplish. --Onion 12:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

SPAM

Keep
  • Perhaps you're missing the point. Obviously, it was written by a monkey. It's supposed to be an example of spam. I take it you don't have e-mail, Jack Mort. Either that, or your friends have never signed you up for porn sites using your e-mail account. Keep. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Ditto--~ Tophatsig 20:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep What else would you put for spam?--Redribbbon 02:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Humourous, agreed with emc.--Meht 21:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. In fact, there aren't enough spelling errors and grammar problems (at least of what I read) --Onion 21:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • If this was written by a monkey, and a monkey on a typwriter would reproduce Shakespeare, then this article must be a work of Shakespeare. Who are we to delete the Bard's works? --EvilZak 08:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Parts of it are unfunny and not very creative, and although it's certainly not VFH, it's also certainly not VFD. --Anyone 18:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete

This could've been written by a monkey, and likely was - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 17:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
yes I know what spam is, spam is infinitely better than this article, at least spam's imaginative and absurd, this is just risable flooding - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 18:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Hudson Leick

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Don't know who this is, and the article neither informed me nor made me laugh.--Procopius 04:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill - WTF? --Micoolio101 09:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • not awful, but not worth keeping either - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 17:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn, baby burn. -- Hindleyite 17:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Can I get a 'de-1337? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I know who she is...she deserves better.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Sounds like it was written by a mentally incompetent fanboy. --Onion 21:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Hot Topic

Keep
  • Good article that needs images and organization Mr. Briggs Inc. 14:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • It's not good, but it's not bad enough to delete, definitely salvagable - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 17:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree with Jack, surprisingly. -- Hindleyite 17:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with Hindleyite.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • All it needs is a little revision. --Meht 21:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's okay. Made it a bit easier to read. It's not great, but it's not that bad. -- Paw_print.jpg 22:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's a bad article and normally I'd say delete, but there's been a fair amount of traffic to it and maybe one day it could be better than crap. If it's deleted the whole idea will be lost and someone will have to get a premonition to write about Hot Topic before we ever see it again. --Anyone 18:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Sucks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn, baby, burn.--Procopius 04:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - This hot topic is about to freeze... --Micoolio101 09:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Any article that quotes Oscar Wilde in a way that doesn't sound like something Oscar Wilde might say, you can put me down for deleting right away. --EvilZak 08:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. Red links, numerous grammar mistakes, and overall unfunny rambling are grounds for a delete! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I won't cast a vote, but it seemed that none of it was truly original and I've read pretty much the same thing on other sites. --Onion 21:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • What's with all this "it sucks, but it doesn't suck enough to delete" bullshit? If it sucks at all, it sucks enough to delete. --EvilZak 08:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • When I say it sucks, it usually mean that it really sucks. I have perfected the art of sucking (business is open, 9-5). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 15:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I think we're saying that it sucks to the point that it can be improved Mr. Briggs Inc. 10:14, 24 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Grindcore

Keep
Delete
  • Sucks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's like the Platonic form of a noob came down and wrote this.--Procopius 04:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • christ, bad, and not even about grindcore - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 17:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I've seen articles suck before, but this is the suckiest load of suck that ever sucked. -- Hindleyite 17:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Yuck. -- Paw_print.jpg 21:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Hang by the neck until dead. --Onion 21:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Tim Burton

Keep
Delete
  • Sucks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. We owe Tim Burton more than penis jokes.--Procopius 04:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • kill kill kill - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 17:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Old and cheesy, like a packet of Wotsits left at the back of the cupboard. -- Hindleyite 17:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I've read some very funny ranting, but this is just sad and pointless.--Meht 21:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Constant sexual references don't make you funny. They make you sound like a middle-schooler. --Onion 21:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Prosperity Wicca

Keep
  • It's weird in a good way! "a neo-pagan cult devoted to improving your socio-economic status" WTF? Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP. However, I am open to improvement in "implementation". --Curious Larry 04:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Vancouver Grizzlies

Keep
"Am I just too stiff when it comes to humor, or does someone find this amusing?" 

Yes. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Eh?

  • Keep. Admittedly needs a rewrite and better organization, but it's salvagable.--Procopius 04:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Same as Procopius. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. See above. ^ --Hhamdy283 04:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I know it doesn't have much of a chance of being deleted now, but still. --Anyone 18:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I don't show my face in here often, but I couldn't pass this up. Really folks. Hit random page a few more times. There is a wagonload of crappy random articles out there much more deserving than this one. It just needs a bit of work. ~ T. (talk) 20:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Agree with Todd. Heck, there are some Featured articles worse than this one. The intended audience is Vancouverites, but that doesn't make it deletable. Besides, as someone who lived in Vancouver most of his life, it's fun to see Vancouver-content here on Uncyc. --Ogopogo 22:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That it made up a whole city named Vancouver and pretends that there is B-ball in Canada are more than enough reasons to keep it. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

I think Jock and Jack need some time out. --Ogopogo 23:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

  • I think Jock and Jack are excercising their right as users to put articles on VFD they deem unworthy. Granted their opinion might not be in the majority, but we all don't think alike. I'm just glad people are going through random pages finding things for VFD at all. It's not like it's a huge waste of time to vote for a keep...or a delete. --Anyone 04:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
    • This article (like SPAM) is a case that illustrates that some people are putting things to vote on VFD (and voting for delete) simply because they personally don't like the article, rather than trying to decide whether the article is worthwhile keeping in Uncyc as it might appeal to some segment of readers. Remember, not everybody on Uncyc is the same age, background or nationality. For example, if it's an article about Vancouver, ask whether someone from Vancouver would find it interesting. You may have to research on Wikipedia to learn the background before putting it on VFD. --Ogopogo 14:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
      • I certainly understand what you're saying. We do get those who would use their power for evil rather than good (not that I'm saying jocke or jack have done this). But along with the cons of giving everyone an equal say, the pro is that everyone has an equal say and thus we can all protect the articles that need protecting by voting to keep them. There is nothing to fear from VFD; all you have to worry about is the admins because all they do is delete everyone's articles without even reading them and for no good reason, those jerks. Seriously. --Anyone 16:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
        • Er, um, I am an admin, so I don't know what you're saying. Speaking for myself, putting everything to a vote is fine and dandy but, in my humble view, more deletionists (especially some who make it their mission of the week) than inclusionists hang around VFD. Thus, those nominating or voting (even if they don't particularly like an article) should act responsibly and we shouldn't have to count on the general population of Uncyc to watch VFD and make offsetting Keep votes. In any event, we're gone away from my original statement which I thought was justified in the circumstances of this particular article. --Ogopogo 17:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Face

Keep
Delete
  • Sucks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - ZZZZZzzzzZZZzz... --Micoolio101 06:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Slight merge and delete - The article has nothing to offer except those fake episode names. They'd go great in Hou... on second thought, I'll put them on myself. Hoight! Alksub 17:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig 23:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • haha Who's the bitch now you communist motherfucker? It's got some funny, but is too poor to live - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 16:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Poo (pretends he never made an edit to the article). -- Hindleyite 18:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Put a bag over it (delete) --Onion 21:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Didn't realize this was already deleted. Sorry. --Onion 21:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Deleted -- Hindleyite 18:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The people

Keep
  • Merge with Joke. I'll change my vote if it is established that the writing is stolen. Alksub 17:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • what's there is well enough written, it's just not really an article. i'm gonna see if i can merge it with anything - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 16:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • This article hasn't been edited in months. It's an in-joke and isn't very funny. On top of that, it has nothing to do with the title. --Onion 20:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm thinking about making a "This article is completely fucked; feel free to VFD this on sight" template for such articles. Oh, and delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Send this shit to hell --Micoolio101 06:40, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig 23:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

BUHHDA

Keep
Delete
  • shit of an article with no sense whatsoever. does not provoke none neither. + the fuked up title ensures that evan a cat wouldn't find it in 9 lives even if it scrounged the dumps of uncyc. believe me, i've spent 3 months here, 24/7, and i chanced upon it by sheer accident and i'm a buddhst cat!! -- mowgli 19:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Blasphemy against Benson can not be tolerated. On an unrelated topic, you're a buddhst cat, Mowgli? --Anyone 19:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
no, no, i was just kidding. i'm hindu -- mowgli 05:13, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Personal tools
projects