Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive44

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (URL correction (using pywikipedia))
 
Line 292: Line 292:
 
|-
 
|-
 
||'''Delete'''||
 
||'''Delete'''||
* The above article is little more than a vessel for racist slander. I'm surprised its author had the good sense not to call it "Niggas" or something. Not surprisingly, however, that was all the good sense to be found: according to the article, "Nigerians" are lazy, lazy and lazy people who do nothing but rob and scam. A nrv tag was placed on the page in June, but [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Nigerians&diff=816475&oldid=816469 was removed] by the author. Suggest speedy deletion followed by the author's execution. --'''[[User:Medvedev|<font color="Black">Medvedev</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Medvedev|<font color="Red">scream</font>]])</sup>''' 20:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
+
* The above article is little more than a vessel for racist slander. I'm surprised its author had the good sense not to call it "Niggas" or something. Not surprisingly, however, that was all the good sense to be found: according to the article, "Nigerians" are lazy, lazy and lazy people who do nothing but rob and scam. A nrv tag was placed on the page in June, but [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/index.php?title=Nigerians&diff=816475&oldid=816469 was removed] by the author. Suggest speedy deletion followed by the author's execution. --'''[[User:Medvedev|<font color="Black">Medvedev</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Medvedev|<font color="Red">scream</font>]])</sup>''' 20:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete''' The article has not been written to since June 2006, a NRV tag was placed by an Admin, but removed by author. This one slipped past quality control and missed the Forrest Fire week. It is racist and offensive, with little to no redeming value. It fits the requirements for a VFD. Unless someone wants to take a shot at rewriting it into something funny, it must face natural selection. --'''[[:Uncyclopedia:Admin Rank|2nd_Lt]]''' [[User:Orion Blastar|<span style="color:#00d330;text-decoration:underline;">Orion Blastar</span>]] ([[User_talk:Orion Blastar|talk]]) 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete''' The article has not been written to since June 2006, a NRV tag was placed by an Admin, but removed by author. This one slipped past quality control and missed the Forrest Fire week. It is racist and offensive, with little to no redeming value. It fits the requirements for a VFD. Unless someone wants to take a shot at rewriting it into something funny, it must face natural selection. --'''[[:Uncyclopedia:Admin Rank|2nd_Lt]]''' [[User:Orion Blastar|<span style="color:#00d330;text-decoration:underline;">Orion Blastar</span>]] ([[User_talk:Orion Blastar|talk]]) 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Deleted''' --[[User:Spintherism|Spin]] 22:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Deleted''' --[[User:Spintherism|Spin]] 22:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Line 377: Line 377:
 
||'''Delete'''||
 
||'''Delete'''||
 
*'''Delete,''' just a long list. --{{User:SonicChao/sig}} 23:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete,''' just a long list. --{{User:SonicChao/sig}} 23:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', if memory serves, it looks similar to the version that was [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion&oldid=962231#Super_Smash_Brothers_Brawl vfd'd] before.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 23:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
+
*'''Delete''', if memory serves, it looks similar to the version that was [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion&oldid=962231#Super_Smash_Brothers_Brawl vfd'd] before.--{{User:Modusoperandi/sig}} 23:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. {{User:Tom mayfair/sig}} 09:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. {{User:Tom mayfair/sig}} 09:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Even the intro isn't good. --[[User:Sbluen|Sbluen]] 15:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Delete'''. Even the intro isn't good. --[[User:Sbluen|Sbluen]] 15:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Line 838: Line 838:
 
Could I possibly get better feedback than 'sucks' or 'stupid'? 'Incoherent' (a standard that would eliminate almost all of Uncyclopedia) is arguably not accurate, but if it seems that way it at least gives me something to think of when I try to work out how to possibly restructure the article and definitely rework or replace the summary I'm not happy with. Actually, that IS useful feedback. It's precisely what this article isn't supposed to be.
 
Could I possibly get better feedback than 'sucks' or 'stupid'? 'Incoherent' (a standard that would eliminate almost all of Uncyclopedia) is arguably not accurate, but if it seems that way it at least gives me something to think of when I try to work out how to possibly restructure the article and definitely rework or replace the summary I'm not happy with. Actually, that IS useful feedback. It's precisely what this article isn't supposed to be.
   
My main concern has been that while other fans of the comic find the article to be hilarious (and no, I am not the author of AWFW, although I did turn a rather lame and [http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Chiropractic&direction=prev&oldid=1014446 mindless plug] for Chiropractic Medicine into a [[Chiropractic|real article]]), I've been having trouble figuring out how to make it funnier for people not familiar with the series, which has run for over five years, even if it doesn't have the reader base of say, Sluggy Freelance. In the early marketing for the series, the tagline was along the lines of 'Is she really an angel'? I've taken the editorial viewpoint for this article of 'Hell No!', one strongly at odds with the viewpoint of the source material.
+
My main concern has been that while other fans of the comic find the article to be hilarious (and no, I am not the author of AWFW, although I did turn a rather lame and [http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/index.php?title=Chiropractic&direction=prev&oldid=1014446 mindless plug] for Chiropractic Medicine into a [[Chiropractic|real article]]), I've been having trouble figuring out how to make it funnier for people not familiar with the series, which has run for over five years, even if it doesn't have the reader base of say, Sluggy Freelance. In the early marketing for the series, the tagline was along the lines of 'Is she really an angel'? I've taken the editorial viewpoint for this article of 'Hell No!', one strongly at odds with the viewpoint of the source material.
   
 
One thing I have NOT done is throw into this article a lot of overused stock gags that dominate most of this place (especially bad fake quotes -- most of the quotes in the series quote section are word-for word or very close, heightening the humor, at least for people who have read the series -- Oscar Wilde is nowhere to be seen as he is not a character and I'm sick of fake Oscar Wilde quotes).
 
One thing I have NOT done is throw into this article a lot of overused stock gags that dominate most of this place (especially bad fake quotes -- most of the quotes in the series quote section are word-for word or very close, heightening the humor, at least for people who have read the series -- Oscar Wilde is nowhere to be seen as he is not a character and I'm sick of fake Oscar Wilde quotes).

Latest revision as of 23:58, April 26, 2011


Fag Newton

Keep
  • Hilarious. There's something to be said about having a parody of an unrespected cookie. --Fishonfire 21:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC) 21:14, 6 October, 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Kill. Short and randumb. Can't anyone make a decent gay joke article? --Onion 12:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Blast. Stupid. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 12:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: stubbier than a midget (and way less funny too). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stoopid. Would of been a keep if it just had a central topic and theme, instead it just wonders around aimlessly like a baby lost in a forrest...of razor blades. --Anyone 16:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This is ED quality shit. Delete it. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Um, yeh...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 11:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Is this an actual product? Anyway, it's a bit tasteless. -- Hindleyite 19:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Ultimate Guitar

Keep
Delete
Comments

Tompkins CVPd it. Voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)02:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Sand nipper

Keep
  • It's either a racist page or a blunt satire, depending on the reader. I see it as the latter. I should also point out that I used the sand-"n"word (unbowdlerized) in the worst way in a featured article filled with bad words used in bad ways, and there was barely a peep about it...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep- see my comments below. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've thought about it. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. After much deliberation (much = 2 minutes), I've realized the article's intention is just to be funny, which it sort of accomplishes. --Anyone 13:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite Maybe it can be rewritten to not be racist or religion bigoted? --Off Des Orion Blastar (talk) 03:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I'm one of the ones who can see the humour in this. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 15:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete

*Destroy. Normally I like racist humor, but this isn't even humor. It's just racism. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 02:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC) Vote withdrawn changed. See comments below.

  • Delete: Racist or not, it's still not funny. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Utter Crap -If the pile of shit on the article page wasn't enough, Diz sealed its fate with his assholery on the talk page. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I dunno...it's racist for sure, but I think with a little work it could be racist AND funny, and at the end of the day, isn't that what christmas is all about? So maybe no deletion...yet. --Anyone 17:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)|
  • You know, I'm just plain tired of this...Let me take the time right here to say: I'm sorry if I offended any one with this article, but frankly, you need to lighten up and learn to take a joke. I wasn't trying to be racist, just to write a funny article. If you think it sucks or could at least be funnier, by all means, go right ahead and fix it up, do whatever you want (as long as the joke still remains). And since when did Uncyclopedia get so PC? We're about the humo(u)r, not this "sensitivity" and "civility" bullshit. It's a joke, that's all--everyone knows that that stereotype doesn't represent the majority of Arabs, and if you want offensive and insulting, read some of the articles about Christianity at Uncyc. This article deserves to stay, especially considering there are waaaay more offensive and way less funnier articles out there. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • DiZ, it doesn't matter if you were TRYING to be racist, it is racist. Minstrel shows are also jokes about black people, but do you see any articles based on that? You're right, there are some articles which do make some racist jokes, but the fact is, you created an article based on a racial slur and used patently racist terms to describe Arabs. Don't drag out the old "PC," "sensitivity," and "civility" arguments, there's nothing there. You're right in the sense that good humor should have barbs to it, but there comes a point where you can leave good taste behind, where it turns from humor to plain old racism. To be fair, this is in the eye of the beholder, so that is why I put this on VFD, in order to see what the community thinks of it. --Jsonitsacsig jsonitsac talk to me crimes against humanity20:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • If the community doesn't like the article, I can't fight it. But let me just say, this is Uncyclopedia, and humor comes in many forms, including ethnic jokes. And there is a difference between minstrel shows--who deliberately made fun of blacks in a harmful and racist manner--and this article, whose purpose is not to garner laughter at Arabs' expense, but rather to poke fun at stupid people's perceptions of them through wordplay. The last line of the article proves just where the humor is directed. One more thing: a work such as this is only as racist as its writer. If I had gone to that page with the idea that all Muslims really are terrorists and what-not, I'd have written a much different and seriously insulting article worthy of a huff, but the fact is: it's not racist, however much you want it to be. If this article truly offends you, you need to take a chill pill; if you're jsut doing this because you feel you or someone else "has to", then stop, because it's seriously unnecessary. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • This article is racist. That's obvious. It is more than likely that this article was written by someone that does not particularly like Arabs, or someone that isn't the smartest, or someone that is both. However, there are people that enjoy this form of humo(u)r, and we have to respect that, even if we don't like it. There is a page on here called Holocaust Tycoon. It's just as offensive as this is, however, it's funny. I don't think that this article should be deleted because it is racist, but because it sucks. --Hhamdy283 21:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
      • If you think the article is not funny, that's fine, even I agree it's not one of my best works. But your observation that I'm either stupid or prejudice towards Arabs (which is stupid in itself) is based on the recurring idea that you have to be racist to write a racist article. Untrue. I know all the stereotypes, I know that lots of people think Arabs are terrorists, blacks are thugs, Asians can't drive, et cetera, et cetera. But just because I acknowledge the existence of these common stereotypes doesn't mean I give them any credit or believe them at all, because I don't; it's just a joke. That's what some people can't seem to grasp. Vote for humor content if you have to, not on the basis of racism. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't think it should be deleted just because it's blatantly racist, I mean fuck, look at Niggers. It's racist as hell AND it's one of the best articles on the site, BUT it's brilliant, brilliant satire on the hypocrisy of using Native Americans as sports mascots but not blacks. I mean really, compare the Niggers logo to the Cleveland Indians actual logo. Is the Niggers logo any more racist? Not the slightest bit. It's just an unacceptable form of racism. That's satire. This article however doesn't seem to make an actual point about sand nippers. I wasn't actually going to vote delete at first, because honestly, it did have some cheap laughs, but as I read on, I actually felt like this was something an overt racist would write. I'm not accusing Diz of being racist, I'm just saying it doesn't rise above the level, in terms of humor, of what a blatant racist would write. I don't think Uncyc should just be a repository of obvious racist jokes that everyone has heard before. I mean honestly, Muslims kill people and drive Taxis? It's been done before. I don't think Diz is actually that bad of a writer, I just don't think he thinks his ideas through enough. Articles should be more than just a bunch of jokes pasted together, ideally. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: DiZ, while I don't like this article, I am not willing to vote for its deletion based solely on claims of racism. If we can feature an article on the "Birmingham Niggers" and not bat an eye at Black People or United Negro Porn Fund, then crying racism simply because anti-Arab racism is a hot issue right now is ridiculous. Sure, it's a racist article. So is the Niggers article. Even White People is racist. We have lots of offensive articles but we're not deleting them all. Fag is based on prejudice, sure, but it's funny in a stupid kinda way. I'm not saying everyone should vote to keep this article, but think about it for a minute. If you're saying the only reason it should be deleted is because it's racist, then what you're really saying is that racism is okay in some cases but not in others. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
    Addendum: ENeGMA has apparently already said it better than I could. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
    Addendum the Second: I am changing my vote to keep. I reread DiZ's explanation and I better appreciate the intent of this article. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Some further clarification. The article doesn't offend me. Nothing like this could possibly offend me. It's just not an article that I think does the idea any service. A bunch of racist jokes CAN be funny, when done properly. But an article that's basically a litany of them isn't the correct treatment. But what do I know. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Admittedly Diz released it too soon, but there's the spark of something there. With more time it could be two sparks of something. Maybe three. If it's killed please put a copy under his userpage, so that he can work himself into a lather trying to coax the spark into something more.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Aaron Keating

Keep
Delete
  • Bad. And the begining is a complete rip off from en.wp. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I almost huffed it when I first saw it. Jeez, I must have been slacking that day. -- Hindleyite 14:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Not funny...and who the hell is aaron keating really? --Anyone 17:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Call of Cthulhu

Keep
  • It's not awful. It kind of reminds me of way back when. Sad, yes. Crap, not so much.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It needs content, not death. --Onion 02:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep *Summons Nyarlathotep* --Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 05:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Needs more, but that penis for eyes part merits keeping imo. --Anyone 18:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Not great but needs a lot more. No mention of Lovecraft, silly monster names etc? The first para joke about it being a mating call is quite good.Pewpewpew 01:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Bad nerd joke. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: As it stands, it needs more work to make it good than is likely to just randomly happen. If one of you wants to go fix it, go for it but until then I'm voting against it. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Towelhead

Keep
Delete
  • Allahu Akbar. laa funny, aiwa edit wars, aiwa big mess. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 19:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Wow, ignorant and crappy, we've set a new high. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Explode. This is a pile of crap. --Onion 21:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Bah! It's tough to make a subject like this funny. This proves it. That I have redneck relatives that use this term doesn't help...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Wtf? I thought I deleted this? Ohhh.. I deleted Towel head. I'll let people "vote" for another day and then make it 2 for 2. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 23:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Derka Derka Mohammed Jihad. This is terrible. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Spelling, grammar, and a tiny bit of wit is all we ask. This article doesn't deliver.----OEJ 00:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Bizarro Arkansas

Keep
  • Any page that mentions a "plentiful supply of easily-husked ducks" is good enough for me.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • And any page that includes "a 24 hour coin-operated Chirch of Elvis" is good enough for me. --Drone Fragger 18:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Needs some more but it has potential...I agree with the comment though, I would hate to see it start a trend. --Anyone 18:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It has potential. Fixer up. --Hhamdy283 00:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • Ambivalent: I would hate to see a plague of "Bizarro New York" and "Bizarro London" articles...this is not a meme that I would like to see take root. But the article per se is not a bad or evil idea, though woefully underdeveloped.----OEJ 00:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Youth socialism

Keep
  • Keep. Dammit, it's got grate potential. It just needs development. Hell, formatting would help a lot. With apologies to David G. I will tweak it slightly -- he can always revert.----OEJ 01:02, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. The last line alone redeems it. Major insignia Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (20:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC))
Delete
Comments
  • Bah. It was a happy little rant and entirely true. *sob* Please userfy if dictated to suck. I'll see if anything else can be done with it - David Gerard 11:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

ACLU

Keep
Delete
  • Kill. Ugly and unfunny. Good topic, bad article. --Onion 15:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • If there's one thing I know, it's bad satire. This doesn't even meet my low standard for it.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Good lord people, we can do better than this on the topic of the ACLU. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. Agreed. Good topic, but a horrendously bad article. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Stoopid --Anyone 18:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. An article that needs to exist, but not like this. Dammit, NOT LIKE THIS!!! --Hhamdy283 00:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)!
Comments

Windows xp search dog

Keep
Delete
Comments

Windows XD

Keep
  • Stop! Keeper time. Doo doo doo and such. Alksub 07:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's worth it for the pic...and the text isn't crap. It's stubby, not crappy. VFD is for crap.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • It's good, it just needs more added to it. The picture alone is worth it :D --Drone Fragger 18:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Give it some time to be worked on. I'm trying to contribute to it, so Keep --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 23:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • If the the article is stupid, just press that little button up there with the word "edit" on it. Jedibob5 00:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - David Gerard 11:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • cmon. It's not like it's some random bullshit. The author had a purpose and stuck to the concept in a mildly funny manner. That deserves to stay. --Anyone 18:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, I think its funny. TZM 18:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Mmmmm...stub....--Hhamdy283 00:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Not brilliant yet, but promising. Tode 10:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Random, pathetic Microsoft bashing. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, but first I want to learn the secrets of fish mining. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 05:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 12:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. Concept = good, writing up = bad. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: The article is not well written and is not worth keeping. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm guessing a militant Linux user wrote this. --Onion 21:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • To those of you claiming that the article should be saved because the image makes it worth saving, I say no. One amusing image does not a good article make; if you like the image, save the image, don't demand that we keep a crappy article around to justify one mediocre image (that's why we have VFP). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Just one thing - a {{WIP}} template has been placed in the article and it has still got like 6 days until it expires. So, why don't we just wait and see if Shadeix can fix it? -- The Colonel (talk) 10:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Campbell

Keep
Delete
  • "You know what? You suck Colonel." Reads like it was written by Racter. Alksub 07:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I couldn't read it all the way through. It didn't make a lick of sense.SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 12:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Strikes me as nonsensical crap that doesn't deserve to stick around. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Burninate. It reads like it was written by a retarded crackhead with only two fingers, both of which are broken. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. If that's experimental prose, the experiment has failed.----OEJ 00:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • DESTROY --Micoolio101 04:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
Comments
  • Illegally NRVed, but it looks like this should probably go anyway, unless someone gets a joke I am not seeing. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


Some French chick

Keep
Delete
  • Delete - A worthless page. I didn't laugh at it. --Micoolio101 11:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
  • Delete - a page full of lists. -- mowgli 11:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The image of the French chick is all that it has going for it.SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 11:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

DELETED: Normally, I'd wait a little longer but, in case you all forgot, I really hate stupid, crappy lists. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke

The_Dog

Keep
Delete
  • Looks like vanity. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 23:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks like vanity, reads like vanity, it is vanity. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 05:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Nothing worth keeping, and it's vanity. Powerful magnet Alksub 07:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanity. That's one ugly bastard.SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 12:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Image:HDTV - Reality Check.png

Keep
Delete
  • What an unfunny, copyright infringing, piece of dull crap. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • VFD's for images, too? Well, hell, then, delete. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • My sock puppet doesn't approve of copyright infringement, do you buttons? No! OK, then Delete. Alksub 07:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 12:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Images should be deleted through Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/unusedimages but I've nuked this one for now anyway. This does, of course, mean that we don't delete images unless they're unused. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Michael Van de Waal

Keep
Delete
Comments

Nigerians

Keep
Delete
  • The above article is little more than a vessel for racist slander. I'm surprised its author had the good sense not to call it "Niggas" or something. Not surprisingly, however, that was all the good sense to be found: according to the article, "Nigerians" are lazy, lazy and lazy people who do nothing but rob and scam. A nrv tag was placed on the page in June, but was removed by the author. Suggest speedy deletion followed by the author's execution. --Medvedev (scream) 20:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The article has not been written to since June 2006, a NRV tag was placed by an Admin, but removed by author. This one slipped past quality control and missed the Forrest Fire week. It is racist and offensive, with little to no redeming value. It fits the requirements for a VFD. Unless someone wants to take a shot at rewriting it into something funny, it must face natural selection. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Deleted --Spin 22:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

REDIRECTED to Nigeria. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Nintendorgasm

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gordonk

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Just end it. I've been seeing this appear in recent changes lately, and it's not funny. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 21:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. We discussed this on Forum:Gordonk which is also being vandalized. Not only it is not funny, it is being used to harass people and is part of some Photoshop contest. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 18:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Gone, I guess... —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)18:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Elaine

Keep
Delete
Comments

Sony GayStation

Keep
  • Heh, It needs more content. And when I say content, I don't mean more Gay game puns. --Drone Fragger 18:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Just a bunch of gay jokes and puns. --Sbluen 15:06, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Gheyleet. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:51, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • --~ Tophatsig 18:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Reads like it's been written by a 12-year-old. --Onion 21:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • There's a vote for keep, so I'll let somebody else dispose of the thing. --Spin 22:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I hate it and it disgusts me. Unfortunately the article's technically OK (headings, illustration, see-also, categorized, wikilinks). There's other articles with content I dislike. Hmmm. Guess I have to abstain, huh?----OEJ 16:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Ogrish

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 18:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • This thing needs a major rewrite. Bad. But I'm too lazy/busy/don't know enough about SSBB yet to write a good one. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 09:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Angband

Keep
  • It's one of my favorite games, and this isn't completely bad. --Sbluen 15:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Spontanious combustion

Keep
Delete
Comments

Capital idea, Crazyswordsman. Redirected it to Spontaneous Combustion; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)18:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


OIFY

Keep
Delete
  • umm. yeah. Delete. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 19:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete & block it forever & ever, please.SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 19:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, and block the creator. Please. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 19:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Please huff it and direct the creator to Myspace. -- Hindleyite 20:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Pointless, the endless NRV tag is a good idea though. Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Delete. The original was short and probably would not survive a VFD vote in its original form; the vandalization only made a non-notable article completely useless.----OEJ 00:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Furries aren't funny. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 09:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Robert Paulson

Keep
  • Are you mad??!! Keep by all means... or add more jokes. FYI I am Robert Paulsen and I just happened to ENJOY hearing my name over and over and over. Mr. Briggs Inc. 09:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • The world needs more references that people should get, but don't.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Slay. If this is a joke, I don't get it. Possible vanity. --Onion 03:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC) (Edit: forgot time stamp.)
  • Eliminate --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 03:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Obviously vanity unless this person is famous for something. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 03:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, maybe not, this really is just a pointless AAAAA! clone about some stupid critic on some stupid site. Mr. Briggs Inc. 09:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC) Is not Robert Paulsen Is not Robert Paulsen Is not Robert Paulsen.
    • I am not saying keep the article, but seriously, has no one here seen the movie Fight Club?---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
      • I don't get it, but if it actually has to do with something keep.
  • This should have been huffed on sight -- Hindleyite 12:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Why wasn't this QVFD'd? Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 09:07, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • He will be remembered without the article. I promise.SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 09:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The first rule of Fight Club is don't make pages that are just allusions to Fight Club.
The second rule of Fight Club is don't make pages that are just allusions to Fight Club.---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 06:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

  • As it stands, the article sucks. Since it's apparently a legitimate reference, maybe someone can build it around a real article. --Onion 23:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. I'm guessing it's copy-pasted. --Onion 01:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: This looks like plagiarism and if it's not, then it's unacceptable content for the topic and should be nuked anyway. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 02:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm secretly Shiva the Destroyer, this is a copy/paste of a news article from India. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 03:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Crush it -- Hindleyite 12:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 18:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Is this satire that I don't get, or is this just a copy-paste of a real newspaper article? ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

I do think it is a copy-paste. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 18:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

British moors

Keep
Delete

Delete This is linked to the O.o article mentioned below. Good topic, but the article isn't very good. ----OEJ 19:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Yep ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • End it --Onion 19:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Pants -- Hindleyite 19:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Egad. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Can we say "totally off-topic"? Yes, I think we can. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 02:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

O.o

Keep
Delete

Delete I can't see much coherency or logic here.----OEJ 19:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Republican Party

Keep

I was "meh" up to the "Strange Brew" reference. Now I'm weak keep.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 17:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Keep BUT full license to destroy any given part of it. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 17:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. Needs a rewrite and fewer Star Wars references. --Onion 19:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Needs a thorough torching to encourage comedic growth. But there are outcroppings of funny. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Are you kidding ENeGMA? Keep. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 18:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It needs a rewrite if anything. But an article like this shouldn't go down the tube. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 09:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • RedoSpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 09:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete

I tried copyediting it, but there was just no hope. Please God delete this shit. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete This article sucks more cocks than Andy Dick at the Interstate Rest Stop Men's Bathroom at 3am in the morning. It is an embarrassing attempt at humor by some liberals with an even worse sense of humor than David Letterman, Al Gore, and Colin Quinn all rolled into one! Someone go find some actual funny liberals to write a better one than this. --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk)
Comments

Do this: Compare the version before my edit to the last version by Chronarion. That should give you an idea of why I think this should be deleted. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Babel:Wtf

Keep
Delete
Comments

Blasphemy

Keep
Delete
  • Textbook case of wandering crud. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 04:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Blasphemy is one of my favourite subjects. This doesn't do it justice.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Being not funny by itself is blasphemy against Sophia. -- The Colonel (talk) 11:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Good topic, bad article. --Onion 12:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Goddamnit!Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 12:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete But it's a really good topic and someone ought to recreate a properly blasphemous article on the subject.----OEJ 16:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Anus

Keep
Delete
Comments

Iostream.h

Keep
Delete
Comments

Gaia

Keep
Delete
  • Delete this ugly piece of crap. PLEASE. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's random stupidity. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 22:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Second. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC) (crap, edit confict. make that third)
  • Slay. Formatting sucks and so does the content. --Onion 00:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Deleted: This was probably QVFD material. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 10:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Masshole

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Stupid and too old to NRV. --Onion 20:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed Not funny. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 20:46, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Deleted: I'm a Masshole, proud of it and totally shamed by how lame this article was; thus it has been done in by me. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 10:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Sadako Yamamura

Keep
  • Not bad enough to delete, maybe to split in to sections. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
Delete
Comments

The combining of Sadako Sasaki and Sadako Yamamura has som potential, but it is poorly executed. Someone (by which I mean someone who has actually seen that movie) should do a rewrite, but this version is probably killable. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 20:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Dookie

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Well, it tries but I don't think there's much point.----OEJ 17:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I can't believe it's not deleted! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Like Episodes I-III, this sucks. --Onion 19:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Like Episodes I, II, the first half of III and the last half of VI, this sucks. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 20:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Otakukin

Keep
Delete
  • Delete: Page after miserable, thesis paper-like page of some braindead otaku making a straightfaced, desperate plea for someone to care about his religion delusions. And it becomes a list article on the bottom. Kill it! Kill it! --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 02:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Asplode. I agree with Capt. Spam on this one. It seems to be the desperate pleading of a delusional wackjob for someone to care or acknowledge his useless fanaticism as a legitimate use of one's time. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 12:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment: To be honest, I was looking for a way to rewrite this in a way that made the hurting stop. Couldn't find any; I mean, mixing otherkin with otaku fanatacism? The topic mocks itself. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 02:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I dunno, Cap S. There seems to be an attempt at satiric inversion ("Otakukin should not be confused with Otherkin, who are simply sad, deranged basement dwelling individuals...") which reverses the true situation (Otherkin consider Otakukin to be posers). I'm without inspiration for an original ardickle right now, lemme see if I can wright something funny on this one. [[Addition, later] Never mind. Too ill to write anything. Count me out after all. ----OEJ 17:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
    Comment: I would say common sense indicates that both groups are sad, deranged basement-dwellers. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 12:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It looks to me like there's a bit of humor and a bit of potential there but also a lot of crap and poor phrasing. Perhaps if the article were to be stripped of a lot of material, all the colloquial phrasings and some of the other junk, it might be more worthwhile. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 10:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Summerville, South Carolina

Keep
Delete
Can't vote on a page that isn't tagged VFD. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 10:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
it is... so we can. Soul101 Icons-flag-gb~MAREPENT!
  • Unfunny, factual -- Hindleyite 16:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Tag it with VFD and KILL it. Besides, the actual town is not "Summerville". It's "Scummerville". --Curious Larry 17:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Republic_of_Tinselman

Keep
Delete
  • Looks like vantytatytatytatytatytatytatytatytar:Isra1337/sig}} 06:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Plus there are way too many external links (I stop counting at 30. 30!). Pushing Uncyc on their blog I'm all for; the other way around, not so much.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • That there are almost no proper wikilinks (internal or interwiki) angers me greatly and the topic seems to be one of a vanity sort so I'm going to have to go and vote for the nuking of this here article. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 10:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • What a brilliant article on... urrr... mmmm.... You know! -- The Colonel (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • That's a lot of url extension. Could have atleast used the <span class="plainlinks"></span> to get rid of all those little arrows.SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 11:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. This article angers and distresses me. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 12:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This article could potentially send a lot of people away from us. In more ways than one. Silence it. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

It's

Keep
Delete --~ Tophatsig 22:42, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Monty Python's Flying Circus!Smashy. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 03:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Throw the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch at it. --Hhamdy283 03:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It's going to the trash. --Sbluen 03:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'ello, miss? I wish to complain about this parrot article what I purchased not 'alf an hour ago from this very boutique. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 12:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Kablam kablow. Rad 13:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Westside High School

Keep
Delete
  • What is the standard procedure for highlighting school cruft vanity crap? Oh well, I'll just put it here. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keenan Who?I doubt Codiene's mum has heard of you.--Wit (tawk) 01:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE all vanity. Nobody cares about your high school. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:35, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • First line, Kanye West...and it, surprisingly, only goes downhill from there.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • We shall fight them in the hills! We shall fight them on the beaches! We shall destroy their vanity! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. If it starts with a Kanye West joke, it can only get worse from there. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is almost as bad as the paper I am currently writing on De Studiis et Literis --Hhamdy283 03:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

While we're all here, isn't the new policy no 'acceptable' vanity at all, period, per Codeine's Mom? ZB just tagged it {{vanity}} in case it gets voted keep, but I thought no vanity was allowed to stay, period, according to UN:VAIN? I've just been using the {{vanity2}} for vanity, to NRV it. Is that correct? --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Have we adopted that policy? I thought it was just up for voting and someone had rewritten the vanity pages information page. Nobody told me, so I guess I'll just keep doing things the way I do until I come into contention with someone on the matter. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Ann Coulter

Keep

Keep. Many, many people have worked on this article and its history goes back to 20:43, 6 January 2005 Chronarion. It is a substantive article on a notable person. Anyone can sneak an NRV tag onto almost any article; often an NRV is appropriate and sometimes it is merely the expression of a cranky uber-conservative nitwit who worships Ann Coulter's legs and wants to see the article huffed. Evaluate the article and its history. Don't just rely on someone else's tags.----OEJ 01:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

This is not me putting my name behind a deletion, just merely me correcting a mistake by a noob. I however didn't want to forge the noob's (forget his username) signature though, so I used my own. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I also just now put my comment in the comment box, since that apparantly where it goes :D. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
You all who accused me of being a conservative are just so darned intelligent for being able to figure that out by the act of me making a mistake on the Ann Coulter article. Your own conservatism shows in your narrow-mindedness; your belief that if someone marks such an article in a negative manner, he must be a conservative. Zombibaron corrected my error, reminding me to read the rules, and I did not dispute nor revert the change to the VFD tag. When I mark articles, I expect and hope that there will be follow-up, as in a Democratic process. I personally don't care if it get's removed or stays, as long as it's what the majority desires. For my "conservative" views, you can check two of the four UnNews articles I submitted regarding UnNews:President Bush Outraged at E. Coli, Promises Revenge and UnNews:NSA may be wagging the dog with new spying policies. By checking the Sources and history, you'll see I submitted those articles from Mental Dimensions, a site on which there is a recent post I wrote, titled, "Commentary: Proof of President George Bush's Deceit." So... sorry I didn't read the rules thoroughly before putting the NRV tag on that Coulter article. I'll probably go to conserative Hell for my sins. GravityIsForSuckers 02:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • DIS-QUA-LI-FY. This article in no way qualifies for an NRV tag anyway, due to its lengthy history, substantive content, and age. The plaecment of the template is therefore invalid, and like OEJ said, most likely the lashing out of some partisan fuckwit. The ignorance of said party (who, BTW, will most likely never weigh in here) is not cause enough to post this article on VFD, especially if the poster does not agree that it is delete worthy. I move to strike this nomination post-haste, unless someone lobbies for its deletion. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It's confusing, random, poorly written and many other things too, but without this page many lefty wackos would have nothing to kvetch about (because, if there's one thing right wing nutbars do, it's bring out the other crazies).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
    • "confusing?" "random?" "poorly written?" lol. We're trying focusing on the article here, not Ann's shitty books. Lighten up. Ann represents the Jeffrey Dahmer of politics. She in no way is is the voice of a real conservative point of view. That's just crap. --Lamrock 02:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
      Can you feel that? It feels like I'm pulling your leg. Odd, that.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, but it needs some work. Also I find it funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP. If this article is deleted, the terrists win. --Curious Larry 12:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It needs work, but it's still a great article. The pics associated with it are also great. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:02, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - this article is funny and quite well put together. Lets concentrate on deleting the crap. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 21:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • I found it whith an NRV a couple of minutes ago, so I changed it to a VFD, and then put this here. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I are confused, ZB. I thoughted you voted BALEETE, and then I fell off my chair and spilled my drink and got all......confused. Sorry.----OEJ 01:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I didn't, I merely helped out a confused noob, who didn't know how to use NRV. *sigh* --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Based on votes, this article should be kept. I can't find a vfd tag so it's either been removed already or I'm blind; if the latter someone else should remove it and it anyone gives you guff for removing a vfd tag, tell them I said you could. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Now, see, if that person had NRV'd Ann Coulter herself, I'd nominate him/her for admin. ^_^ —Correspondent Hin Arash, PRAA Icons-flag-us [TALK] [KUN] (20:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC))
I agree with Hinoa. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

SABS

Keep
Delete
Comments

I'm terminating voting on this one, as I've added the {{vanity2}} tag to it, which now acts as the NRV for vanity. (Just like I said on ban patrol, Mordillo.) Voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 18:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC) Yep, noticed it a second too late, sorry bout that. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 18:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Black socks

Keep
Delete
Comments

Megatokyo

Keep
  • I wrote the article, so this will be biased. It was a work of satire, and I was quite proud of how I managed to fit in Noel Gallagher and a few other articles. And I managed to keep pretty good grammar standards through the article. Petie 02:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It needs work and probably a better illustration, but is there a vendetta against comic pages this month?
Delete
Comments

Template:Bomb-help

Keep
  • Keep.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 08:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. It is almost the exact same thing as Template:Bomb except for one word and not used on any articles. --Kzrgyzstan 02:28, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • As Kzrgystan notes, this is near identical to Template:Bomb, which in combination with the fact that nothing uses it, justifies immediate deletion. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

A Wish for Wings

Keep
  • Keep.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 08:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep -- but I would be expected to say this. I now see I wouldn't be the first author to vote to keep his or her own article. --Strangelv 18:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments

Could I possibly get better feedback than 'sucks' or 'stupid'? 'Incoherent' (a standard that would eliminate almost all of Uncyclopedia) is arguably not accurate, but if it seems that way it at least gives me something to think of when I try to work out how to possibly restructure the article and definitely rework or replace the summary I'm not happy with. Actually, that IS useful feedback. It's precisely what this article isn't supposed to be.

My main concern has been that while other fans of the comic find the article to be hilarious (and no, I am not the author of AWFW, although I did turn a rather lame and mindless plug for Chiropractic Medicine into a real article), I've been having trouble figuring out how to make it funnier for people not familiar with the series, which has run for over five years, even if it doesn't have the reader base of say, Sluggy Freelance. In the early marketing for the series, the tagline was along the lines of 'Is she really an angel'? I've taken the editorial viewpoint for this article of 'Hell No!', one strongly at odds with the viewpoint of the source material.

One thing I have NOT done is throw into this article a lot of overused stock gags that dominate most of this place (especially bad fake quotes -- most of the quotes in the series quote section are word-for word or very close, heightening the humor, at least for people who have read the series -- Oscar Wilde is nowhere to be seen as he is not a character and I'm sick of fake Oscar Wilde quotes).

I have tried to make this article a properly encyclopedic humor article and one of the better examples in Uncyclopedia. I have also hoped that enough people can get the Dysfunctional Family Circus reference (even if its heyday was in earlier decades).
-- Strangelv 13:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I read your article and then read wikipedia's article in the hopes of getting enough information to help me have a sufficient background. Having done that, let me put forth the some suggestions and consolations. Firstly, without impling that it's the case, consider the possibility that the topic just isn't a good basis for an article. As more evidence, and to contest the matter of your particular comic taste mattering at all, there currently does not exist an article for Sluggy Freelance, Penny-Arcade and many other major comics do not have articles. Beyond that, in reading the wikipedia article on the topic, I found it to be a dry, uninteresting article that read like a webcomic cast page; in reading your uncyclopedia article, I found it to be a dry, uninteresting article that read like a webcomic cast page with the injection of hallucinatory references and totally random statements (ie. libel suit for taking the time away from disassembling a food processor and a Cisco server). I'm sorry if I'm being a little bit blunt here but that's my modus operandi. As a further thought on the matter, consider Calvin and Hobbes; the article creates comedy on multiple levels by juxtaposing elements of the comic with historical theology and philosophy; one need not understand both sides to get the joke and the article as a whole stays primarily on a narrow set of topics with fairly narrow deviation and nearly no seemingly random insertions. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Sir Major Gwax, you should be promoted to Major-General for that response. I think it is spot on the mark. ----OEJ 01:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. This is far more useful than what I've gotten so far. I actually have a better idea now for reworking the article, but it's not going to be something I can get have ready in the next few hours or even, probably, days. --Strangelv 18:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
If it's deleted before you get a chance to rewrite it, just create a new article; make sure, however, that you don't repost what gets deleted or someone may respond negatively. If it isn't deleted before you rewrite it then more power to you. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Panic! At The Disco

Keep
Delete
  • Emo Crap. Yes, I did make an image for this as an Image request. And today as I was watching recent changes, I noticed an edit to it. So, I looked at what had become of this article. It was crap! And my image was gone! so I added my image, and am now seeing if y'all agree or not. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete! This Article. It could've been funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 02:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I hate this article. I hate this band. --Hhamdy283 04:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)!!!!
  • Delete: Random nuke-worthy crap. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:6, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. Emo can't die quickly enough. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Deleted: As per your votes. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Himesh

Keep
Delete

Votes above this line unfounded (see comments)

Comments
  • Well, I think it sucks but we at least need to hear from someone who's actually heard of this guy. Seems to be a reputable Bollywood actor. Failing that, delete it. -- Hindleyite 18:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I address all issues here by matters of ethics, precedent and fact:
    • This is not vanity/slandanity/non-noteworthy, this individual can be found on wikipedia under the article Himesh Reshammiya; one should generally use as a quick check, whether the individual can be easily found on wikipedia.
    • Self-removal of a NRV isn't (or at least shouldn't be) automatic QVFD, however it certainly does/should warrant a short term ban of the perpetrator.
    • Beyond this, the claim that the article is lame is a perfectly valid delete justification.
Thus gwax spake and interpretted the law of the land. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Deleted: good, I didn't think it deserved to be here and now I've had the proper justification, in the form of your votes, to act on my beliefs. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:50, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Camp Fuck You Die

Keep
  • Keep -- This article was submitted to VFD a while ago, and the vote was to keep; besides, this article is excellent. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't get what's so funny about it. Here's a sample form it: "Pie Trees: Grows various types of pies. Most of them are fine to eat, but the blueberry kind transforms people into muppets."--Mister Nosey 23:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete - It's just a big list of a bunch of random crap that isn't funny. I'm surprized it's survived this long.--Mister Nosey 21:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I was banned for making VFD going just half as long as this page. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 06:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It really needs to go, it belongs on ED. I wish I'd never made that picture for it. Freemorpheme.gif 13:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuck You Die. Honestly, this is excessively childish and lame. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Every other time this has appeared on VFD (and it's been up more than a couple of times,) I've voted to EX-TER-MI-NATE this... "article." This time's no different. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not funny in any form. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 11:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Deletaletalete -L 14:46, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete- Article speaks for itself. --Lamrock 02:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

I do plan on trying to rewrite this, see talk page of this article.--Wit (tawk) 03:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

As a general rule of thumb, intentions to rewrite in the future are not worth the paper they are printed on. It should further be noted that web pages tend not to printed on paper. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
You've done a swell job in confusing me. But not a complete rewrite Gwax, I do plan on taking the humorous bit out. But alas, some just like Camp Fuck You Die the way it is.--Wit (tawk) 01:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
My point was that just because you say you're going to rewrite it in the future doesn't mean that it's worth saving now. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
But I want to use some content from this article, I'm afraid that if it's deleted, I can't get that content.--Wit (tawk) 21:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


Atkins

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Atkins Diet

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

AG4111

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Model T

Keep
Delete
Comments

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 18:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Definitive list of people System of a Down have confessed to murdering

Keep
Delete
Comments

Main Page

Keep
  • It has redeeming quality...like words...and pictures...more then some. Its been around forever...thats good. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Delete. An obvious cut and paste from Wikipedia. It's also got some copied and pasted stuff from some article on killing birds. Text includes: "did you know...

...that I'm moist? ...that AAAAAA Aaaa aa aaaaaaaaaa aaa!" and racist jokes. How long has this been there? Ugh. Oh yeah, I couldn't add the template because some joker protected the page. Huff instantly.--Gubby 16:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments
  • This nom should be removed, the nommer has forgot to put the template at the top of the page. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

How about no. Voting closed, it's been done before. TWICE. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)16:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Cancer Staging

Keep
Delete
  • Delete This is a non-satirical article, probably an early version of Wikipedia's cancer staging article. Except for my ill-advised attempts at revision it had only one author and one version. ----OEJ 15:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This article is terminally factual. --Onion 17:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Is a gonner. --DW III CUNOUN 18:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Purpleism

Keep
Delete
Comments

That One Guy

Keep
Delete
Comments
Personal tools
projects