Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive43

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion
Revision as of 23:57, April 26, 2011 by Fnoodle (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Johann van der Fart

  • BURN! Just might be the worst article Ive had the displeasure of reading. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Flush. Poop Cuisine is enough. --Sbluen 06:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Stale. Another "All your base" reference?--Wit (tawk) 06:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Obliterate -- Hindleyite 16:02, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • When the highlight is an "all your base" reference, and its plot revolves around poo, you know you're in for a bad read.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Defecate. This is terrible, even considering how much I love poop jokes. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, I couldn't make it past, well, the mere idea of this article. I won't lie, I pretty much didn't read it. In this case, I can just tell. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. HAHA!! POOP JOKES!! HILARIOUS!!! --Hhamdy283 20:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-FART. There. Wasn't that funny? No? Well, there you have it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Snakes on an Uncyclopedia article

  • Meh...it's a meme that never caught a hold of any of the parts of me that are holdable...but it's not awful.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Delete--This seems random, ugly, and overall uninteresting. But maybe that's just me.----OEJ 20:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 21:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's a good idea, but it'd need a really awesome picture and less suckage to stay. --Hhamdy283 21:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Too random, and it spells Transformers "Tranformers". Which is blasphemy!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks like the author forgot to preview. --Sbluen 06:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Darth Hitler would not approve.--Wit (tawk) 06:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Gordon flaming Bennett, this randumbness has to go -- Hindleyite 16:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Blammo. Not only did the author forget to preview, it appears the author also forgot to make the article not suck. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I liked the part when it ended. I'll love the part when it's deleted. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm all the facist cyborg this wiki can handle, and I say EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Dismantle (or Delete) - Stupid. --Micoolio101 05:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101

The Colour Pink

  • Keep. Not that bad. Needs editing ("divulges into more detail" is rotten) and a picture, but otherwise coherent and a nice little fantasy piece.----OEJ 14:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Not that bad. Not my choice of comedy, but I'm sure some would find it entertaining sort of way. --Mkns 18:42, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Per Quira_Snake> I'd vote delete for being absolutely random, offtopic, and incoherent.--Shandon 23:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Micoolio101 23:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
  • Delete. ----OEJ 00:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Pie. This article is terrible. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 02:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article is to humour as Simple Plan to music. --Hhamdy283 03:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • BLAH! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • too random. --Mkns 18:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. There seems to be a wave of randomly incoherent rubbish these days. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 21:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

The Backwards Man

  • Keep! Well, never mind, go ahead. Bah. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • undecided I don't know; I think it could be improved. I reckon the framework is there, it just needs some more guidance. --Mkns 18:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Delete: this is just pathetic; clearly we can do better than this trite. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. This is bad. Real bad. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE with a Fruit Fucker. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, and make Tycho rewrite it. Also, wang. —Hinoa talk.kun 17:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Full of random crap. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete with extreme prejudice. Also wang. --General Insineratehymn 23:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Micoolio101 23:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
  • Delete. Almost as bad as emo music. Maybe.--Hhamdy283 03:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Deserves better. -- Hindleyite 18:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • please delete before I accidentally read it again. --Mkns 18:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Deleted. Gone to the great Arcade in the sky. Or something. -- Hindleyite 18:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)



Delete. Nonsense, not funny. --Hhamdy283 20:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC) Delete: Short, unfunny, bit too unrelated. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete: This, even translated under its own merits, is a sub-par article on a video game rating system and/or the standards board that pulled it out of thin air. Or whatever the acronym got reverse-engineered into. Sports, does it say? What does this have to do with inserting random ligatures, ampersands, and British spellings all over the place? Kill kill kill --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 21:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Worthless. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wasn't funny when I first came across it, and it still isn't funny now. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Completely nonsensical and eye-hostile as fuck. --General Insineratehymn 23:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • BLAH! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:19, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I second this BLAH!--Wit (tawk) 06:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Keep. I don't think it's completely without worth, although I'll certainly agree on its need for expansion.--epynephrin 14:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Same as above, should be expanded. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: It's short and the joke is obvious but it's definitely a good stub as is. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:38, 19 September 2006
  • Keep. It just needs some love and care, like me. Freemorpheme.gif 22:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: I've definitely seen worse, and I think this could work with a bit of expansion. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 18:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Permit. It's worth a chuckle, 2 good quotes, a picture, it just needs to be bigger.--Wit (tawk) 06:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Can you just leave the old version in the history. It's not among the worst articles. --Sbluen 06:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Weak and unfunny (the article even acknowledges the latter). - User:Guest/sig 03:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Unfunny, random nonsense, and unfunny--Shadeix 03:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Even the first part is bad. --Sbluen 06:04, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Almost as bad as the program it's about. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Hhamdy283 20:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Unworthy crap; 'nuff said. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Cremate. Not very funny to say the most/least. --The Insane Velair Wight 23:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff --NXWave 02:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Executed (don't look at the link color, it's been recreated). - User:Guest/sig 05:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Delete. Probably QVFD meat (spam) but been here over a month so it do be submitted here instead.----OEJ 00:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks like template material. But templates aren't advertisements or articles. --Sbluen 03:49, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. Looks like vanity/advertisement. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. What the hell is this article supposed to represent? ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Uhh...--Hhamdy283 20:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Deleted: This was probably QVFD worthy. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:36, 19 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Terminate it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Pennies? Is that supposed to be funny? I mean, delete. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Hasta La Vista. Penny pic is only slightly funny.--Wit (tawk) 04:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Too short and not much content -- Hindleyite 16:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Too short. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 23:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ----OEJ 00:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Uhh...--Hhamdy283 20:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not worth keeping. I'd delete it myself but, in general, I feel that things tend to deserve more than one day worth of voting. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

The Grim Reaper

  • Nothing extraordinary, but that could be said for many articles. Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Yes Briggs, and all those articles should be deleted, I think. Deleted or improved, and we both know they won't be improved. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Deleted: It's been up for vote for a few days, deletion was up by a bunch of votes and, in my interpretation, the article was too random and stupid to deserve survival. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

All That

  • KILL. The worst possible combo of redlinks and stupidity. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete all that, unless someone can delist and clean it. --Sbluen 00:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Deletey: The redlinks, scattered blue, and white background DOES make a nicely patriotic page, but not a particularly good one. Lost interest in the first volume. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 02:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • To quote some guy on VFH: "It ain't all that." ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Wait! This was on VFH, right? Like shit cannon? As I said on VFH, "A poor second cousin to 'You Can't Do That on Television'"--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC) I came to the realization that I don't care if it stays or goes...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Get your hands off of my grandmother! Oh-ho-ho-ho! Which is to say, delete. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Crud -- Hindleyite 17:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sbluen, I could probably do a rewrite on it, except it wouldn't have anything to do with the show. Plus, it'd be a bit short and would require tender loving care to bloom into a full-blown article. Can anyone here make jokes about set theory? Might help. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 02:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Steam Forums

  • This is some of the better vanity. And it seems to follow vanity policies. --Sbluen 00:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't see it as vanity. It's geek culture.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Modusoperandi speaks the truth, keep. Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • It certainly falls within vanity policies so ask yourselves this question: if we delete it will it ever be rewritten as well as it is now (not that it's great or anything but it's ok). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sbluen, theres no such thing as better vanity. Thats like saying you prefer horse shit to dog shit... -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 00:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Then why not eliminate everything in Category:Vanity? --Sbluen 01:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
We definitely should, they all suck... -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 02:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Robert Gordon's Colledge

  • Very ugly, factual, and probably violates the vanity policies. --Sbluen 23:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lacks proper headings, pictures, clarity, and style. ----OEJ 01:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • No vanity is acceptable vanity. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Who the f*ck misspells a title? Oh, plus it's vanity.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Total existence failure is what this article needs. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff it -- Hindleyite 17:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Game:Multiplayer Chess


I think it's inappropriate, but I won't vote until we discuss it here

Kept; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 16:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

David Lee Roth


Black man's penis


Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 17:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Funny as hell, it's the article that made me want to contribute to Uncyclopedia in the first place. --Magellan 22:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This article is funny as hell. Yeh, those not well aquainted with its subject won't get it. But that's true for a large number of uncyc's articles. I don't think that's a reason for deletion. And Ammo: complaining about the format when you have no idea about the content it's stupid.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 10:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: Could do with a serious cleaning up but it is by no means delete-worthy. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keepsies. Make it less listy, though. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [20:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)]
  • Keep. It's a bit weak, and I'd suggest a cleanup, but come on, any Uruguayan who knows how to clean anything up is already working as a maid in Buenos Aires. --User:Falcotron/sig 23:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's 1:30am and I think it's funny, so I would probably appreciate it more if I was awakeish. --Hhamdy283 05:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Definitely not deletion-worthy. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 07:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. A major cleanup is needed, though. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 10:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)



This is just a list of some random facts with a few random pictures. --Sbluen 15:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)


Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 20:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Leeroy Jenkins

  • It's all right. Freemorpheme.gif 15:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I say keep it. Leeroy is a freaking legend! -- Malevevis 18:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Unfunny randomness bearing no resemblance to the truth. - User:Guest/sig 11:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Totally agree with Guest. References to Ninjas, Communism and the Presidency of the US. Plus, it uses a smiley. Randumb, to coin a neologism. -- Hindleyite 11:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Screw World of Warcraft and all its related memes. DESTROY with eXtreme prejudice.Hinoa talk.kun 12:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't know why this lived for so long. --Sbluen 15:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Me neither. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 21:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Evil cheese grater skeletons


Deleted on account of being even more Arlen related vanity. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Big Mac the Pimp

  • Delete: Another one that seems related to Arlen. Or it at least has his non-templated box on it. And it sucks regardless. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • WTF is with that Arlen template? Is that there to warn us that what follows is crap?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Erm, what is this madness? Vanity, mereckons. -- Hindleyite 11:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll take my chances against Big Mac the Pimp in order to save future readers eyes from this atrocity. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 19:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Deleted on account of being completely terrible, unfunnily crass and possibly vanity. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Dylans Hat

  • Delete: Found this one hanging out with that Arlen kid (see below). Probably up to no good. Brought it in for questioning. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • More Arlen vanity. I'm guessing he knows a guy named Dylan. Dylan has a hat.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • What Modus said. Randumb. -- Hindleyite 11:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Watch this article get deleted, Arlen. Can you see it? Can ya? Sorry, I just felt like being sinister for a moment there. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 19:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Nuked on account of being vanity. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)



Nuked on account of being vanity. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Kurt Cobain


Short Articles

  • Factual and funny, and I think Short article is worse. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Keep. As per Mister Briggs. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: It could use some work, but this is doable for meta-humor. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It's policy. -- Hindleyite 11:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Self-reference = win. If it weren't so short, I'd VFH it, too. —Hinoa talk.kun 11:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. With or without the edit. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 18:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I think it was funnier when more self-referential (i.e., short), but some of your changes were funny, so I tried something in between. I also shortened the VFD messagebox. Keep any version you like. And my comment is now longer than the article. --User:Falcotron/sig 00:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I'm feeling generous today. --Hhamdy283 05:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This actually made me chuckle. Chuuuuuckle... --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This article is better than Short article because it has more of a point to it. (isn't as much of a "Brevity" style article) Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Don't mind me, I just had a bit of fun with the thing. If the people who voted to keep don't like the new style, revert it back to old-school, yo. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 18:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
    • I'm a little annoyed that you removed the VFD category, but I'm sure that wasn't intentional. Right? (glares threateningly) H.20:56 UTC, 09.14.2006
      • Oops, did I? Sorry 'bout that. Yep, completely unintentional is right. Pssst... is he still glaring at me? No? Good. And for the record, I enjoy Falcotron's combining of the two versions. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:55, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Ghey Records/MVH Music Records

  • Found while looking through the "Featured" category. Don't think I need to say anymore. --KATIE!! 10:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I wanted to say keep because it has lots of words and pictures, which implies effort, but this is just really bad. Delete - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 10:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. The title says it all. "Ghey"? Since when were we ED? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. I've actually seen the real "Back to the Shit" album cover... and yes, it is that awful. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. That anonymous user has a lot of time and energy, but unfortunately it was all wasted. --User:Falcotron/sig 23:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete just for putting your mom in it. --Sbluen 04:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 04:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)


  • I don't care whether or not you keep the article, but leave those pitures alone! Mr. Briggs Inc. 10:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?

12 Monkeys

  • Keep Author gets an A for effort. (A "C" for funniness). --Darkfred 15:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, it's not great, but it's not crap either.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, this is not VFD material, more of "Expand" material. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Keep. it's not that bad, just needs expaanding and formating - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 10:43, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Random and too far away from the truth. - User:Guest/sig 13:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • *rolls eyes* ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I like random humor. But this... isn't humor. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. This isn't humor, it's just random crap. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's not the worst, but I really think that you can't really make something like this better. Huff it. --Hhamdy283 00:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The only joke that's not both completely random and completely unfunny is the sequel to 11 Monkeys, and that's not worth saving the whole article. --User:Falcotron/sig 23:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It's a shame it's so crappy, because I like the movie poster. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Isn't this more of a candidate for NRV than VFD? --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 20:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
    • The article has been around for too long to be a candidate for NRV, so we have to use VFD; such is the way our policies work. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Halo 2

  • Vote keep so some idiot won't delete the current version anyway. --Darkfred 18:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • keep. It's not good, but it's not bad enough to kill - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 10:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sporked from Wiki with some unfunny edits. Needs huffing and something decent put in.
  • TO THE GALLOWS - looks like crap! --PiOfFive 17:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • OFF WITH ITS HEAD! This is crap. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I intensely dislike Halo, but I could write a funnier version if I weren't so lazy. So, yeah, goodbye. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 20:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Reverted to last unsporked version. -- Hindleyite 11:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Dead Baby Jokes

  • KEEP Some people find it funny. I actually prefer the list to the text, its a honeypot for degenerate humor. --Darkfred 15:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • They can be funny if you can suspend your senses of taste and decency for them. And lots of people do find them funny, even if you don't. And the rewrite made this a hell of a lot better. Spang talk 18:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - As much as I tend to hate this kind of crap, I think there are situations in which it http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion&action=edit&section=4should be allowed. In the same way that we have Chuck Norris/Facts because some people like them and there is no way to stop people from continuously recreating them, dead baby jokes should be somewhere. Personally, I think the right way to organize things would be to have an article exist at dead baby or dead babies and have a sub-article at dead baby/jokes or dead babies/jokes but that might be asking too much, so lets just leave it as it is. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)\
  • KEEP I think its fine, dead baby jokes have been around for awhile and deserve a spot in Uncyclopedia. The list is great, tho absoloutely disgusting. --Redribbbon 20:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is absolutely disgusting to me. But, however disgusting I and many of my Uncyclopedian peers may find it, some people find this to be hilarious. I am sure that there are some people that loathe Oscar Wilde quotes, but it is tolerated because alot of people like them. We have to be democratic about this, and let people do what they want. For these reasons, I say we keep it. --Hhamdy283 00:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow, that's awful. Come to think of it, I've never heard a funny dead baby joke. Up until five minutes ago I'd never heard one at all.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Awfulness is not criteria for deletion... and I don't find them particularly funny either, but they're great conversation finishers at Pro-Life rallys. --Bloodrage 05:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
      Awfulness is a criteria for deletion. If something isn't funny, will never be funny and/or isn't saying something, there's no need to have it on Uncyc. ED, on the other hand...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. This has been recreated & huffed several times, and each time it's been nothing but a tasteless list. I don't see any chance for redemption here. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • DIEDIEDIE. Useless. I'm sure there are plenty of hilarious tasteless dead baby jokes, but they don't deserve an article. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 19:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and Ban! I'm usually a fan or amoral, depraved, and peurile humour, but this just made me feel physically sick. Whoever wrote this thing should be drawn and quartered. --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 20:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Tired, unoriginal joke(s). —rc (t) 00:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Smacked the beejus out of what was a crappy list page. --Bloodrage 04:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

It ain't something I agree with, but the voters have spoken. Kept; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 01:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Ska band

  • Vanity, but I think new users do better with a "democratic process" than unilateral deletion (a.k.a. I'm not dealing with recreation). --KATIE!! 19:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Exterminate. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 20:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanity -- Hindleyite 11:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. No such thing as allowable vanity in my book. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • BALEET - It was hard to look past the mediocre wiki-formatting, crappy grammar, wording and the like but once I got past that I was able to realize that the article sucked. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Read the first sentence. It's vanity. --Hhamdy283 00:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Poop, butt, butt, butt, fart --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 20:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

British Cold War

  • Gee guys, I dunno... Others were attacked by severe cases of ennui and never recovered... that's pretty damn good if you ask me. Hell, I didn't think of it. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 02:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Blue state

  • Short and the ultra-partisan bias just isn't funny. Even if we do want it to be very Republican in slant, which I think is the right idea, this can be done much better. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Iyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. No see funny. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 20:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not very good, is it. ----OEJ 21:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • go away I've passed funnier bowel movements. --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 22:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Ewww. Remind me to never read Mindsunwound's pages.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 17:28, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


  • I say blank the entire article except for the line: "These songs, called spirituals, were the beginning of basically everything in American music except Brian Eno and David Lee Roth. Also Sting." for obvious reasons... Also Sting. --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 22:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Just dreadful. I'm all for racially-themed irony, á la niggers, but this is shit. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • As Pathetic as Vader Vs Lollipop Guild. Prejudice humour is not used very well at all here.--SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 12:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to that one baseball team from Birmingham.  >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN   12:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Racial satire has to be exceptionally witty to overcome it's emotional nature. This is not it. Also, on a side note, I think I've just been zinged by Tom mayfair.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. What the hell is with the CHEONG HENG crap throughout the article, too? —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Granted, given the context, the following pronouncement will sound... well, awkward, but EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 20:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Ugh. End this bad motha. --Hhamdy283 21:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Though it has some funny parts, it is mostly crap.--Redribbbon 18:47, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
  • The CHEONG HENG crap was added at latest content revision by, God knows why -- privately motivated vandalism? We have many articles that are technically and conceptually worse than this one, but that's no excuse.----OEJ 16:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 20:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Dickens

  • "An incredibly dull and long-winded Lord of the Sith." I mean, c'mon!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • You really don't care, just as long as it's "Darth" right? Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?

Darth Hogan

  • I'm a sucker for rastlin' references.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, I don't see your big reason behind nominating EVERY "Darth" you come across, but this is a decent article. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?


  • This isn't funny. It tries way too hard, there's at least 3 other pages dealing with the Alt key on the keyboard. Moosemanmoo 22:30, 7 September 2006 (EDT)
  • Delete. Is not good, and nobody has worked on it for nearly a year. (If the author was workin' on it my vote would be different.)----OEJ 03:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Even if there weren't other "Alt Key" pages, this page would still be pointless. There are really other Alt key pages? Geez, I'm not as much of a geek as I thought.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Uyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Asplode. Terrible. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • bereet prease. --Darkfred 18:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I've seen worse, but this is pretty not good. --Hhamdy283 20:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 20:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)



Executed; voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 17:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Delete. Pointless. --Admiral06 23:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Can you believe this took multiple edits to create? --User:Falcotron/sig 23:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Launch all delete for great justice. I love the picture though. --Darkfred 23:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Removed from VFD, but deleted anyway. Admiral06, read the deletion policy. The proper course of action would have been to NRV it or list it on QVFD. VFD is not here for fast deletion; that's why it takes 6 net votes to delete and 24 hours before any action is taken. Do it again and I ban you for a day and block you from editing VFD for a week. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

13030392921 (number)

  • Keep This is funny, but since it is apparently a telephone number in colorado it should be moved immediately. --Darkfred 23:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Some parts are funny to some people. However, if 13030392921 is divided by the speed of light it comes up 43.465 and it should come up exactly 42 to fit in with the Meening of Larf.----OEJ 16:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete At least fix the spelling if "it's" vs. "its". It's driving me mad. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Swampworth (talk • contribs)
Sign your votes plzkthxbai. H. 13:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not funny, serves no purpose. --Hhamdy283 20:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Some of it is pretty funny (in a geeky way)--but all of the jokes would work just as well in any other article. Plus, I suspect this is User:'s phone number or something, so (even though all of the original text is gone), if the article is kept, it should be moved to a different number (where, again, it would be exactly as funny). --User:Falcotron/sig 23:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Uyhh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, but I am of a similar mind with Falcotron on this one. If the article is not deleted, it ought to be moved to a different number. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy. User:Hinoa4/sigM 21:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

27 (number)

  • Delete. This is the worst article I have ever read. Spelled "Bible" "Bibel". Ugh. --Hhamdy283 20:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Like an idiot, I read it even after Hhamdy283 warned me, and now I am sad. --User:Falcotron/sig 22:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Make Hamburgers

  • Doesn't deserve deletion though the beginning could use to be rewritten. Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • The beginning is awful, but it gets better. Just needs the start fixed, pics and links.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It needs reformatting as well as all of that, but it's definitely salvageable. --User:Falcotron/sig 18:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keepit. Actually read the whole damn thing, and it is humorous at least. If not ugly. Just needs some touching up and formatting...maybe pictures too.--Wit (tawk) 01:26, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Other than the first few words, how is this vanity? Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Eh? Huh? It doesn't look like vanity to me, nor does it look humorous, then again it is extremely poorly formatted... so I wasn't enticed to look for long... I have no feelings about this article whatsoever otherwise. --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 18:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

REMOVED FROM VFD. NXWave, please do not VFD articles that WERE JUST FUCKING CREATED. That is what the maintanance tags are for. Next time you add such an article to VFD, you will be banned for a day and prohibited from editing VFD for a week. Capice?RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 23:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The Hot War

  • Delete: The (adjective) War which started in (year) and ended in (year) was an (adjective) fight between the (people_name)s and the (nonsequitur)s, leading to casualties in the (stupidnum) range. All it's missing is an Oscar Wilde quote. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 22:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Possibly hopes for a re-write, but until then: bye-bye Mr. Article. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 23:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, although it might be funny if translated into English. --User:Falcotron/sig 01:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I wish this article would marry Courtney Love so she would have it killed. --Hhamdy283 03:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing to see there, move along.----OEJ 03:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 03:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Ame

  • The time has come. Execute Order 66. Let the Great Darth Purge commence. - User:Guest/sig 16:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. This one's always looked like vanity. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, too many redlinks on there too. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Reeks of Vanity. Plus, the pics suck. -- Hindleyite 18:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This one sucks --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 18:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Too many red links, the pics suck, and it reeks of vanity. --General Insineratehymn 23:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Make it dead. Stinks of vanity, too many red links, and you can only have so many Darths before it's no longer funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 23:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Cow

  • Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 18:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I second For reasons similar to Darth Hitler Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • I Third Serious potential for funny here, i was laughing before I began reading. And the article itself was actually more amusing then average from what I have read. Not hilarious, but infinitely funnier than Calcium or Donald Duck. This website is supposed to be funny right? at least amusing? Do you have a better article which just happens to need this name? If so then just post it. --Darkfred 22:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for the reasons under Sidious below. (But Darkfred, just because we have no other use for the name doesn't mean we shouldn't kill it. After all, we do have a better use for the name Special:Random.) --User:Falcotron/sig 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I have rewritten Darth Cow, please check it out and or change your vote. --Darkfred 23:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Still sucks, my vote stands. (Sorry.) - User:Guest/sig 12:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Dietmar

  • Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 18:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I second Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • I third article is funny --Darkfred 22:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for the reasons under Sidious below. --User:Falcotron/sig 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Hitler

  • Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 18:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I second besides, this is practically an uncyclopedia In-Joke, Darth AND Hitler! Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Keep - rewrite Like Hitler, only Evil I love it! --Darkfred 22:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for the reasons under Sidious below. --User:Falcotron/sig 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's actually pretty decent. I'm sticking an expansion tag on this mothah if it's ok with all yous. --Hhamdy283 03:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Darkfred's rewrite is actually pretty funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I rewrote Darth Hitler, see if you like it. --Darkfred 02:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Nocuous

  • Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 19:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I second Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Keep for the reasons under Sidious below. --User:Falcotron/sig 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Darth Sidious

  • Re-Write I think that this concept has much more potential than is currently exploited. The Darthii should be re-ordered similar to the Jesii Project... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 19:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I second Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Eh?
  • Keep. After the current rewriting fervor ends, someone can go over all the Darths and re-VFD any still-crappy ones, and then if there are few or no survivors VFD {{Darth}} separately. (But I'm pretty sure rewriters shouldn't go removing the VFD template before the vote here is finished.) --User:Falcotron/sig 03:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Extensive rewrite. Give it another chance. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo Icons-flag-il GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • The time has come. Execute Order 66. Let the Great Darth Purge commence. - User:Guest/sig 16:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • oh, heck yeah, this thing is too far off kilter to be funny, it should at least have a remote twinge of truth hidden in a pack of lies, but this is just too silly. start the next sketch! --Sharkbait1986 16:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Emperor Palpatine.  >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN   22:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Eliminate. --Hhamdy283 03:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Make them suffer. This would serve the Cabal the Empire Uncyclopedia much better as a simple redirect to Emperor Palpatine. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Mindsunwound, are you volunteering to rewrite all these pages, like soon? If not, given that most of these went weeks or months with expand, fix, or similar tags with nothing being done but vandalism, I don't think it's going to happen. --User:Falcotron/sig 20:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Falcotron, no, I'm not volunteering to rewrite them all, if they get huffed so be it, I was just sharing my opinion on them, and yes, I did look at each and every one... okay... so maybe I got bored after the cow one... which is really funny by the by. --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 00:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
    • no, I read the hitler one too... also funnyish --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 00:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • As far as I can tell from the rules voting keep does not create a requirement that you then rewrite the article. In fact suggesting that it does, to discourage further voting, is downright evil. When this sort of thing happens in real elections people end up in jail. --Darkfred 01:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Famine nuked it, but I've redirected it to Emperor Palpatine. And it will remain a redirect until someone gives me a good reason for it not to be one. Voting closed.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 21:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

ABC's of Nazism

  • this is kinda good; i mean it rhymes and is decently funny; author spent some time to make this.--Redribbbon 23:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • D is for dispose forthwith. --DW III CUNOUN 13:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • P is for pathetic. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 8 is for 867-5309. --SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 14:30, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sucks -- Hindleyite 14:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • ' is for 'kuyh. (That's a delete btw, if you were too stupid/lazy to read the section name). ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Q is for Quit writing bad teenage poetry... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 15:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • K is for kill-o-zap, what should be done to it, because this article is not funny, it's just a crock of shit. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing more than a boring list. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 16:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No, K is for Kompressor. Which is much funnier than this. But then, so is just about anything. --User:Falcotron/sig 20:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment: KOMPRESSOR DOES NOT DANCE! —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • B is for blam this piece of crap. --General Insineratehymn 23:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • K is for kitty kill it. --Hhamdy283 03:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


  • Delete, VANITY!!! --NXWave 05:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: smells like vanity. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Please get rid of it. -- Hindleyite 14:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Intruder Alert --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 15:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy to death, till it's dead. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 16:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE. Vanity has its place, but it ain't here. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I thought the current vanity rules allowed one page for notable dumbass sites, as long as it was funny to the relevant community and not slanderous, or something like that? But I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that this isn't funny even to the relevant community. --User:Falcotron/sig 19:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Shoot it, burn it, drown it, get rid of it. Do it now and get a free iPod! --Hhamdy283 03:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • While we're at it, we can delete PlanetoidF1 along with it which seems to be exactly the same. -- Hindleyite 16:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

John Farnham

  • Well, Hhamdy283, it's british and Australian, methinks. Perfectly so, in fact. It just needs a pic of some nut in the outback harassing something poisonous and benny hill mugging for the camera and it'd be perfect. Then, and only then, would I vote to kill it.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keepify -- Hindleyite 14:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm American yet still understand humour. --SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 14:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Assuming it's about the John Farnham I'm thinking of, this is (a) Australian rather than British, (b) not at all vanity, and (c) worth keeping, although it needs some improvement. But someone really hates the Little River Band. I mean besides me. --User:Falcotron/sig 19:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm not British. This joke seems to be British. I think. Or not. Just delete it anyways. Sucks. Not funny. --Hhamdy283 02:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Needs a Johnny Foreigner tag. I do get humour, but this is perhaps very humourous? I dunno. If enough people think it's important enough, keep it. --Hhamdy283 03:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Purge - I'm Australian and can tell when something is random crap in the way of a good article. I'd write one myself except I'd need to hate myself a lot more that day - David Gerard 14:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanity --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 16:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Snarf. It sucks. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Bartlett's Thesaurus


Definately salvageable (now that it is blank, let's keep it that way) --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 16:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. 100% pure crap! Usual stuff, not funny, short, crap. Good luck with that. --Hhamdy283 19:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The idea might be worth turning into a sentence in the Thesaurus article (which is too short; maybe a section on regional varieties or something would help), but there aren't any funny lines worth keeping. --User:Falcotron/sig 20:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -- some people need to learn that we have standards here. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 20:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Predictable, unfunny, blatant crap. Definitely does not conform to Uncyc standards. --General Insineratehymn 23:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet. Meh. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Poor use of what could be a good pun.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Stingray

  • It's funny. And it's new! Let it mature.Swampworth 16:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, at least until the NRV expires, if not longer. The idea is funny, and it's a little early to huff an article that's getting as many contributions as this one. --User:Falcotron/sig 16:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • VFD is for crap. This is not crap. It's not VFH-worthy, but it's not crap.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This isn't crap! It's freakin' funny, and it's based off of a comment I put up on the Steve Irwin page in the wee hours of the morn! Of course I want to keep it! Mr. Swampworth, you are one helluva guy. Crikey! Master Pain (also known as Betty) 19:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's actually somewhat funny. It needs to mature, as stated above. I'd say give it 30 days, and if it's not improved, beat it to death with a spanner. --Hhamdy283 19:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep And that's pretty rare, coming from me. It has good promise. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Stupid, Lacks Humour, Lacks Creativity, Lacks Taste. Shame on Mr. Stingray--SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 14:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy. Tasteless, unfunny, and retarded. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I know there's a lot of support for this one, but I've pissed better articles in my sleep (see Daddy Long Legs). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 20:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • New article, NRV'd. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Give it a chance! It may mature into something wonderful. Let's see what folks do to it over the next few days.Swampworth 16:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Exactly! The idea is, when NRV'd the VFD can be called off. With a VFD, it is likely to be deleted much sooner. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Jeez! It's easier to sneak stuff into W*k*pedia than it is to get things in here! Swampworth 21:33, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm keeping this and kicking it off VFD due to the fact that Tom Mayfair didn't know what the hell he was doing. Go read the deletion policies. Hard. There will be a quiz. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Awww. Looks like someone needs a Boo Hoo Award. There, there. It'll be okay.--SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 14:48, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Verb Object Subject

  • Keep; I think it's salvageable. It needs more; I couldn't write it without being technical enough to cure your headache by putting you to sleep, but I think someone else (like the author, hopefully) could. --User:Falcotron/sig 22:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC) I still think someone could make it funny (even to non-linguists), but I don't think anyone will do so, after looking at the page's history and the anon author's history. So I retract my vote. --User:Falcotron/sig 02:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Too many random (true?) facts hurts my head. --Redribbbon 21:47, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill: This is not a technical information site for linguists. It can't be made funny. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • TOO MANY RED LINKS WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think somebody may have mistaken this website for Wikipedia. Maybe. --Hhamdy283 19:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Meh. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 13:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Factual -- Hindleyite 14:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Needs more Red Links especially the one linking to it... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 16:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Crisis of year 2006

  • Not that bad. Sure, not brilliant, but worth keeping I reckon. -- Hindleyite 16:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I too, reckon. I'm cool like that.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Starts off pretty well, but gets progressively worse. Good groundwork, but should only be kept if it is improved. --Hhamdy283 19:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 08:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Incoherent rambling nonsense. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 19:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill With Sticks. This is bad. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 21:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, and someone give the poor guy his $10 back for whatever movie inspired this rant. --User:Falcotron/sig 22:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Kuyh (that's a more exotic version of "Iyhh", btw). ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: My eyes!!! Soul101 17:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: I find it devoid of comedy. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 13:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete User --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Here 2cents.PNG 16:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Would be more useful as entropy for a random number generator. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 17:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)



Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


  • A bunch of garbage about a bunch of people. --Sbluen 06:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Sucks. --SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 07:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Sucks Delete. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I think this would be alot funnier if Pollakkers were American or British because alot more people would find it funny, but I think only Norwegians would find this funny (maybe). It's too limited a joke. End it. --Hhamdy283 07:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, lousy. Vembloud 08:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • It's terrible -- Hindleyite 14:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Lousy, delete. I think only slightly deranged Norwegians would be amused by this. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 18:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, because if I imagine the same article with "wetback" (which is, I think, the same joke for merkins) it's still not funny. --User:Falcotron/sig 22:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 00:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools