Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive39

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Falco

Keep
Delete
  • This article has too many overused people. They didn't delete this when I listed it, probably because it was too long. --Sbluen 23:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Too many overused references to which either of the actual falcos have nothing in common. Nothing in the article resembles anything done by either of the actual falcos (the pop singer and the character in star fox). A good article would probably combine those two characters. -Drdisque 00:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Overused and cliche. BURNINATE. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --00:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Jesus + Paris Hilton + Vin Diesel + Chuck Norris + not funny = Delete. -- Imrealized 03:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Don't forget about Adam West and God. --Sbluen 03:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Just flatten this piece of junk with a rolling stone. :) -- Colonel Swordman 13:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Chick Norris in an article not about Chuck Norris is Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Nazi timemachine

Keep
Delete
  • Very ugly and boring. --Sbluen 21:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The tribunal is adjourned due to marital law, so I'll just go ahead and delete this. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)

  • I didn't list this because it was long and the other long ones that I listed didn't get deleted. --Sbluen 23:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Australia

Keep
  • Could use some streamlining, but since when was randomness grounds for deletion? Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 18:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above... nice collection of refs. --George VI 19:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep.....in need of some TLC but not delete worthy... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 23:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, but needs work. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --00:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • As per above, keepsies. -- Imrealized 03:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • This is one big random country with kangaroos jumping all over it. Even if we don't nuke it and start over, it will die from cane toad infestation anyway. -- Colonel Swordman 11:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • On Sir Cornbread's vote - Yes, but the problem is: who is going to do the "work"? -- Colonel Swordman 13:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Dozen

Keep
Delete
  • My worst effort ever; somebody burn it already in celebration of Forest Fire Week. --DW III CUNOUN 06:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • If you want your article deleted, I see no shame in that (I've VFD'd at least 3 of my own before). ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • As you wish! :) -- Colonel Swordman 11:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • If you insist. -- Imrealized 14:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Tenacious B

Keep
Delete
  • This article has too many typos and too much random humor. --Sbluen 01:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. -- Imrealized 05:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed2. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Non-redeemable piece of trash, just like Jack Black. -- Colonel Swordman 11:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Dude, What is Art?

Keep
Delete
Comments

Jermaine Dupree

Keep
Delete
  • This article is short and not funny and it may be vanity. --Sbluen 21:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • One word and one word only. Crappizombify/Delete. Voter Cray Z. Icons-flag-nz [MUN] [FUN!!]22:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Stolen verbatim from An article about Winston Churchill with a music producer substituted for Churchill. Odd, the concept sounds hilarious... Modusoperandi 02:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Fish Within A Fish Within A Fish Within A Fish Within Another Fish

Keep
  • I disagree, though it is annoyingly repetitive. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 18:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I too disagree, for its writer must have been the greatest genius that ever graced the Earth. -- DiZ 18:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Because I'm a jerk. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Not great but not terrible.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Made me laugh (a rare event), and the repetitivity seems to work in its favor; keepsies! --DW III CUNOUN 02:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This is not bad. It's no VFH material, but if you made a pile of bad, this would not be there. Nor would it be in the good pile. Instead it would rest in the verdant forest of meh that rests between the piles good and bad. Modusoperandi 02:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Made me laugh as well. -- Imrealized 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, for now, until our standards rise again. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Too fishy for VFH, but too good to go onto the chopping board. -- Colonel Swordman 11:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Good enough, at least as a home for it's pretty decent images. -Drdisque 00:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • DiZ is the writer. See Talk:Un-Bestiary to find out why people are trying to keep it. Uncyclopedian 19:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Junky junky junky junk. DiZ normally writes better articles than this. Uncyclopedian 19:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Ha, I laugh! Uncyclopedian is just mad cause I told him off. --DiZ 20:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
<scowls at DiZ> It's bad. I WILL NEVER JOIN YOUR COMMITIEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Uncyclopedian 20:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete It Everyone! Uncyclopedian 20:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I won't sink to your level. DiZ 23:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Quiet back there! Don't make me this wiki around! Modusoperandi 02:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Leon Tan

Keep
Delete

Vanity, stupid, racist delete--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments
  • Again, vanity and slander are unfit for regular VFD and NRV provision. We are not cyberbullies and we don't want others to call us so. Next time when you see something like this, just throw it in the bin. -- Colonel Swordman 14:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

New Year's Eve

Keep
Delete
  • This article is infested with typos and rodents. Exterminate them and huff this. --Sbluen 01:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --02:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • The typos! The rodents! AAagheurghhhhh! Kill it! Now! Voter Cray Z. Icons-flag-nz [MUN] [FUN!!]02:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh god... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow... congratulations on completely missing the humour on another topic that could reap great comedic rewards. -- Imrealized 08:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Oedipus

Keep
Delete

King  of  Beer Frosty beverage 20:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments

7-Up

Keep
  • But it subtly mixes Shakespear's King Lear with Porn. Whats not to love? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 22:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • As Mhaille said, it's subtle. Perhaps too high-brow, for the masses. Or maybe it's just porn. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Man! Up until now, I didn't know miss Banks was one of the Seven Uppers! I only knew her for her watersports activities previously. This Article certainly broadened my horizon! --di Mario 23:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. 'Cause Mhaille told me to. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 00:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Needs expansion though, perhaps some refernce to the scene where king Lear runs naked into the storm, or the love affair between the two sisters and Edmond.---Asteroid B612B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • If you expand it, I'll let you keep it. Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 17:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Boobies and Shakespeare. Much better rightside up. -- Imrealized 05:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • Per Nytrospawn. Anyway, this thing just looks like the megatons of stuff we have got rid of here. -- Colonel Swordman 13:56, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I became aware of its sub-par-ness when I made the dn-L image, which, I reiterate, was totally Zombiebaron's idea!!!Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I didn't find it very interesting and it didn't make me laugh. Not once. --Frosty beverage

King  of  Beer Frosty beverage 20:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments
  • I'm just gonna point out that you are linking to a redirect. The actual actical is at 7-Up. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Problem solved. -- Colonel Swordman 18:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
      • With the wisdom of Solomon I say, "Kill 7up but keep 7-Up." There, now no one is happy, moo ha-ha! Modusoperandi 02:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, the current article is crap, but the title itself has a lot of potential. Something blending together 7-Up the drink, 1-Up and 7-Zip. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I challenge Mhaille's claim of subtlety:
  1. The article is titled "7-Up", and the reason for this is likely the starring of Brian Blessed in movie "Seven Swords of Wayland" as King Oswine. You may ask: what does King Oswine has to do with King Lear? The answer is "nothing". The whole article was pretty meant to be a joke on Brian Blessed's roles in both the said movie and King Lear in the first place, but for some freak reason, and as more content was added, the whole thing simply went off into a totally different direction.
  2. The "Film Overview" section was added to the article when Mhaille edited the article the third time. Note there is time difference of almost 1 day between the the first and the third version, with the second version lying right in between. Since both the 1st and the 2nd versions are what we usually consider "sub-stubs", it is obvious that Mhaille did not even have a plan for the article when he started it.
  3. Check this out. The Wickedpedia article outlines the the general plot of Shakespears' "King Lear". Mhaille had likely read it prior to his third edit. However, when he began expanding the article he decide to make King Lear a character starred by Bruce Willis instead of Brian Blessed. It was a flop, and by the time he finished his fourteenth edited there had already been at least 3 jokes mixing and matching in a highly incoherent manner - the Brian Blessed joke, the porn joke and King Lear joke. As a result, the article was doomed to be a piece of random humour - as you can see even today.
(P.S. I am not here to discredit Mhaille as a person but simply trying to point out the 7-Up is nothing but a piece of random humour. Please don't take the whole thing the wrong way.) -- Colonel Swordman 15:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

If I may address each point.....

  1. The title has nothing to do with Brian Blessed, its a not very subtle Pron reference, indeed the only two reference throughout the article are Shakespeare and Porn Films (if you look at a lot of my "work" you'll see a similar pattern of fusing two often conflicting subjects).
  2. The fact that there is a day between edits does not mean that I did not have a plan for the article, rather that I was busy. A check of my edit history will show you that I added a couple of lines to a few other articles around the same time before returning to 7-Up. I am in a full time job, as well as running my own business, so sometimes, sadly, work has to take precidence.
  3. I did not need to read the Wikipedia version of the story as I was already well aware of the plot, the characters and the sources that Shakespeare drew upon. As I have already stated there is only the two themes within the article.
Its worth noting that at the time of the article's "birth" Uncyclopedia was in a transitional phase, between lots of very "stubby" articles to full blown encyclopedic masterworks. I appreciate that humour is often a subjective issue, but feel this article already has more than adequate foundations to grow into something very worthwhile. I refute the idea that it is random, as I have stated there are only two themes. Also, Colonel, (if indeed you are a Colonel) I won't take anything the wrong way. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
  • Well, then, may Sophia have mercy on your article. -- Colonel Swordman 11:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Borrell

Keep
Delete
  • This was originally on the author's user page, but he has seen fit to move it into article territory in apparent violation of Uncyclopedia vanity policies. Delete. --DW III CUNOUN 04:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and warn the author. --Sbluen 06:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • See above 2 comments. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Moved back by user; no prob. --DW III CUNOUN 08:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Capcom

Keep
Delete
  • --Nytrospawn 00:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • If it wasn't for that horrible, horrible list, I'd stay out of this. (too late, though) --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NS|+S 00:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This article wasn't improved much after its NRV tagging. --Sbluen 01:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Disappointing take on the subject matter, which should be a wealth of comedy gold. In the end, this comes up grasping a couple lumps of coal and respiratory trouble. -- Imrealized 05:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This is what happens when you keep your head totally in the box -- Colonel Swordman 05:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill the article, ban the author. Or vice versa. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill both... too many red links. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Dn-L

Keep
  • btw it is the opposite of 7up, I wouldn't delete that.--Alexandrelol 21:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment How about 7up -> VFD also? One inane article + pic of a porn star aren't funny - they are just plain silliness. -- Colonel Swordman 22:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • An inane article upside down? With a picture of a porn star? In a png image? Nah - you didn't even try, buddy! -- Colonel Swordman 21:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the article, keep the porn star. -- Imrealized 22:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Total crap. Also, 7up should be deleted too --Nytrospawn 00:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Reminds me of something kakun did once... And so that can't possibly be a good thing. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NS|+S 00:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Antitibia

Keep
  • It seems to follow vanity rules. --Spin 05:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • This article wasn't funny, even before it was heavily vandalized. --Sbluen 04:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Not funny, and anything that smacks of vanity must go, IMHFO. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • The quotes had me warming up my delete, and the first paragraph confirmed it. Just crap. -- Imrealized 14:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 18:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I can watch the desperate scrabbling of rats on this sinking ship for another day or so. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 18:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Just send this dying cancer patient to its final resting place, will ya? -- Colonel Swordman 21:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Consider this crap deleted. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|NS|+S 00:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Salvaged from the main article: "Someguy fucked up my page, i'm restoring, if you want to delete, it is his fault, so don't delete because i'm working on it yet." The message was left by User:Alexandrelol. H. 18:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Funny...the edits after his first run didn't make the article any worse....I'm guessing that "Someguy" must have been him. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 18:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This is from the same person that did the ABTART crap-wot-got-huffed? Or is there another "page-fucker-upper?" Meh, either way, it's vanity, and I'm in the Moose Party on this one. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • No, I don't know who deleted the Abtart thing, anyway it was supposed to show what happens when you type with your elbow.--LOL!!!!! <3 Alexandre
  • btw, i'm editing it, you guys should give me some tips of how to be funny

--Alexandrelol 21:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

  • SOMEBODY BLANKED MY PAGE!!!!!!!--Alexandrelol 22:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)|}
  • Well, it's an improvement, but I still don't think that will save it. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Great Poetry Riots of 1346

Keep
Delete
Comments

Dmitry Sklyarov

Keep
Delete
Comments

.viagra

Keep
Delete
Comments

The War on Love

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Tompkins should have deleted this article also. It's too ugly. I can't bear to look at it much. All I could manage to do was find the references. --Sbluen 23:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

How to avoid a question

Keep
Delete
  • Vanity, just copied quotes related to an article that failed VFH miserably. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --23:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • NRV'd by Famine. --Sbluen 23:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I dont think its worthy of NRV... Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --23:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Famine is an admin. He decides whether something is worthy of NRV. No excuses. --Sbluen 23:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Sir Cornbread, VFD IS NOT THE PLACE TO GET ARTICLES DELETED FASTER. If you add another article to VFD to get it deleted faster, you will be banned. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

  • I threw this on QVFD when it was started, as it was nothing but whining. It has since expanded beyond QVFD boundaries, but still deserves death. NRV is a go. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The Cult of the Undead Ulcers

Keep
Delete
  • This article is ugly and it isn't funny. --Sbluen 23:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Sometimes an article is constructed around a unique and funny title. This is not one of those times. -- Imrealized 02:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Total undead garbage created by undead ulcers. -- Colonel Swordman 13:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Uh? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • DIE DIE DIE!!! Voter Cray Z. Icons-flag-nz [MUN] [FUN!!]08:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! It's fucking "Deasdl the Sandcrab" all over again. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Master of Disguise Championship Bout

Keep
  • If only so there are still some very genuine "WTF" moments for people to have here. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 13:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with Famine. This is gonna scare the shit out of somebody if they ever come across it. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I changed my mind after I added the vfd tag and forgot to remove it. Some parts are funny. This article just needs links. --Sbluen 23:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I laughed. This is an example of good nonsense. Like seriously, what the fuck is it? We could use some of that. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • /me agree's with the comments above ^ ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon14:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • It's a keeper. This can be fixed up real nice like. Maybe I'll take another look when I'm not hammered. -- Imrealized 23:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • keep, 2 photos and some expansion/formating and this could be a rhyming iliad. actually someone write homer and put this in it. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 19:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete

*All hail the deleter of this page! --Sbluen 03:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Uncyclopedia:Protected page

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • If this page is deleted, it would leave a red link in the system message that appears when a normal user tries to edit a protected page. --Sbluen 04:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • It could do with some nice expansion, that's all. Or it could be a general page for protected stuff-lots of opportunities there. And one more thing-why is it on this VFD page and it doesn't have a pleeping template.--Cray Z. 07:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I guess if y'all don't wanna delte it, you could rewrite so that it linked to a bunch of protected pages. The pages would have to be worked in to make a coherant article...but someone could do it! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, if it needs to exist, then at least don't sentence it to an eternity of its currently mangled messiness. ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon14:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


Bloc Party

Keep
Delete

A bunch of random, thrown together garbage. --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 21:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Take out the trash. By the way, Slovakia isn't a girl. That country is actually a dirty man. --Sbluen 21:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • KILL. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --23:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Knock Thy Bloc Off. -- Imrealized 02:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Gitten Huffing

Keep
Delete
  • I don't like this article, and neither does Splaka and Nintendorulez, who added NRV tags. Unfortunately, this article is now too old for NRV. --Sbluen 19:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

FKC

Keep
Delete
Comments

Sunnmørs-poking

Keep
Delete
Comments

Umm... I deleted it, on accident. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Bob's your uncle

Keep
Delete
Comments

Bob's not your uncle anymore. --Spin 17:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

You know, there's a pizza cafe called 'Bob's Your Uncle' about 15 miles from where I live... Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Mister Ed

Keep
Delete
  • Low quality, overstayed its welcome. Kick it out
  • Way too random. --Sbluen 01:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • As stupid as me. --Adventurer Cray Z.On a quest to kill the deadend.01:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Acid and article writing don't mix. -- Colonel Swordman 02:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • If acid were involved, the article would be transcendent. This author used ether. -- Imrealized 03:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Csabbah

Keep
Delete
  • Its new, but is long, so I'm not sure if it belongs here. Anyway, it sucks majorly. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This thing has got the word "vanity" written all over it and deserves a QVFD. -- Colonel Swordman 14:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanity. Destroy.--TKF 16:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Ugly. Demolish. --Sbluen 17:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Despite the edit war in QVFD, the vanity page is now gone. Thank goodness! -- Colonel Swordman 18:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Simon rickenbach

Keep
Delete
  • This page is not funny. Put it out of its misery. --UNKNOWNFILE 00:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Deleted Vanity like this can be qvfd'd. --Spin 00:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

No more punk

Keep
Delete
  • This article isn't funny and most of it is just a badly formatted list. Tompkins should have deleted it instead of removing the NRV tag. --Sbluen 20:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Spin 20:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Matthew Hopkins

Keep
Delete
  • All right, this is my fault for tagging this Rewrite instead of NRV. The reason I tagged it rewrite is because there is a famous Matt Hopkins--a 16th century witch hunter, which is in itself a much richer subject for satire. I say we smash it flat, and I'll start with the replacement. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 08:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with your incredibly long and boring rant. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 08:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • That dude looks like Napolean Dynamite in an "after meth" picture. It's frightening. -- Imrealized 08:57, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Let it be rewritten after its deletion. --Sbluen 09:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Super Saiyan

Keep
Delete
  • Every version of this article is bad. Someone made it worse by copying from wikipedia. Some users wanted this article deleted in the article's talk page. --Sbluen 07:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete it before some users sue for eye burnage. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry, there's no fixin' this (thanks for keeping *, all) — is that Ricky Martin? Yeah, this needs to get gone. My lawyers will be in touch. -- Imrealized 07:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Can't I just nuke it now and be done with it? Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 08:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

The Random Society

Keep
Delete
  • This article also missed its deletion. --Sbluen 19:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Also burn. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 04:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • It is far too long. I like the part where it ends. -- Imrealized 07:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I should delete this now since it missed the Huff Train™ Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 08:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • I think I should have added this and the below article to this page. --Sbluen 11:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Venn diagram

Keep
Delete
Comments

Note that this is a contested NRV. I blame Ghae. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 18:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

  • If this article is kept, it should be tagged with {{ugly}} because it needs more working links. --Sbluen 03:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Err... Why is this on here? And about the NRV, I told the author to retag it with {{construction}}. It it looks like the author was still working on it afterwards. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

*

Keep
  • Loathing to see another red link on that particular template, I tried my best to give this article a quick fix. It's nothing special, so do what thou whilt and all. - Imrealized 06:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • keep post-imrealized's improvements. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • The rewrite's a keeper. --Spin 16:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • In a rare moment of moderation and calm, I say PRE-SERVE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 01:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Maj Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 17:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • There is nothing good about this article, except for the blue link in the {{Alphabet}} template. --Sbluen 20:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Oh, and needless to say, if ya'll decide on keepin' this, feel free to add to it - Imrealized 06:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

After four days on VFD and a net vote of 5 to keep, majority rules, and article lives to see another day.RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 08:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Also, Famine, would ya mind leaving a note next time you call it up or down? H. 08:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Hearts

Keep
Delete
  • This article missed its deletion because its author removed the NRV tag. --Sbluen 19:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 04:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Phew. -- Imrealized 07:33, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Screw this, I'm smashing it due to a missed NRV. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 08:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Dots

Keep
Delete
Comments

Daimler

Keep
Delete
  • Hack, Slach, and Burn. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • L 02:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Demolish. Automation is boring. --Sbluen 03:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Killit now.--Wit (tawk) 04:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Pwn War

Keep
Delete
Comments

Nyaoism

Keep
Delete
  • Inside jokes. Should be deleted.--Dragonee 02:48, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • There is only one blue link in the whole article. --Sbluen 03:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • RED LINKS!!!!! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • This time, I told the blanker about this page instead of just reverting him and reporting repeat blankers of the same article. Some users blank to get pages deleted, and once they know how to do this properly, they will stop blanking. I told him about this page in the edit history, and Hinoa in the article's talk page. --Sbluen 03:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

James McNeill Whistler

Keep
  • I actually think it's a decent start — eliminate some crap (that anti-Semitic unfunniness has gots to go), wikify it up and it may be aiight. Plus it was started by someone who knows Vico, which is impressive in and of itself. - Imrealized 07:09, 28 June

2006 (UTC)

Delete
  • This article has too many red links and way too much random humor. --Sbluen 04:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll whistle while I smash this to pieces. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 05:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Here be too much randomness and here be too many "here be"s. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • could be good with a heavy rewrite. in it's current form tho, kill. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • Cleaned it up a bit — no more racism and red links, although perhaps the hatred and elimination of red links is a form of racism itself. Damn. - Imrealized 07:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Ligature

Keep
  • If you don't find them funny, fix them. I think you'll find them significantly less funny if they don't exist. I'm always against deleting something that'd create a lot of red links. Spang talk 05:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Seconded. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 08:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
  • For deletion of all related articles. Lacks humor through and through. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 22:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I read all of them without laughing. Genocide them. And don't forget to remove the links to them so that no one creates those terrible articles again. --Sbluen 22:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Nothing really to say. They just suck. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll admit, I couldn't get through 'em all. They had my delete at "the crimefighting duo of Hitler and Tarzen". - Imrealized 02:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • yeh, kill innit. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the template, and most of the things it links to, while we're at it. --Spin 16:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments


Silent letters

Keep
Delete
Comments

N

Keep
Delete
  • This is another bad letter. --Sbluen 16:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Is there a letter, or number, or character of any kind, that isn't bad? I mean, how can you write a funny, satirical article about the letter 'N' or an ampersandt? I don't think you can. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • delete. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
  • All of the letters may be bad, but the ones that I'm nominating are some of the worst. Maybe we should change {{alphabet}} so that it will only be for categorizing letters and it won't have any red links that encourage users to create articles that may be terrible. --Sbluen 22:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
sound reasoning. a red link in a list of links is very inviting but there's not a lot you can write about a single letter, and the ones written have had no effort put in. i'd be happy for the letter articles to be stubs or even one-liners, provided they were funny. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Z

Keep
Delete
  • This article is full of random humor and a bad list and isn't funny. --Sbluen 16:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, get rid of it. And on second thought, we could do to get rid of 99.9% of the letters and numbers. I don't think I've read a funny one yet. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed; toss it already. --DW III CUNOUN 16:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • delete. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
it doesn't look dead. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
It's been recreated and I NRV'd it. --Sbluen 22:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Man bawls to that, I've QVFD'd it. Recreated deleted cruft dies on sight. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
It was recreated with different text, not actually the same article. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Linux Abusers

Keep
Delete
Comments

Dots

Keep
Delete
Comments
Personal tools
projects