This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
Chop it with a claymore!!! -- Colonel Swordman 14:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Proabably redeemable if somebody bothered to work on it. Problem is, who's gonna be? --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Converse 17:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
The answer is "nobody", as in most other cases. -- Colonel Swordman 14:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
As per my votes for Prophecy, HowTo:Die and Fixed-Wing Aircraft. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Just censoring the words and using random words is not good at all. --Sbluen 23:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Very well, Ghelae. Anyone wishing the destruction of his/her own work is fine in my book. Shows hallmarks of a less experienced writer... Culling of the Herd. TDComplain here
MUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 01:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
It could have been funny. But it isn't.--Wit (tawk) 04:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Only because it's by author request. ~CaputosistheHorrible19:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I showed it to a JW and it didn't hit him with a giggle. -- Colonel Swordman 14:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I'd just like to clarify my comment... I just read what I wrote earlier, and it doesn't sound right... I wanted to say that the article showed the hallmarks of a less experienced writer... I wasn't trying to insinuate that Ghelae was an inexperienced writer... I like Ghelae's stuff. I may be a deletionist, but I do still have a soul, and desire to ensure that none of the good contributors take my comment wrong. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 01:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Copied from wikipedia with some changes that actually make it worse. The template should be deleted with this article. --Sbluen 22:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
"Molting Italian Fatass" made me bust out a guffaw, but the rest is to ludicrous and blah. I know funny when I see it, and naming 20-odd restaraunts ain't it. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Great writing. Not funny... needs funny. Delete the article, and vandalize the submitter's house for being a lazy hack. User:TD 01:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Torch it. No article with "Lol" as a header should live (besides the obvoious).--Wit (tawk) 17:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Verbatim factual entry plagiarized without license.....just KILL it. ~CaputosistheHorrible19:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I was going to ask for mercy on this one, but then I read section two. Clear misuse of the word "there" where the author should have typed "their". Since the Author's an obvious retard, I say we kill the article. User:TD 01:14, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Destroy and poop on it.--Wit (tawk) 04:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Of course, I hate 99% of the ipodisms here at uncyclopedia. Euroipods especially. I just don't understand that article... Still, status quo and all, I suppose. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I've seen far worse articles. The line "Fuck you right back!" is really good. I ask for mercy. This can be re-written by someone with more familiarity with the lyrics of NWA. I personally favor Run DMC and the Beasty Boys when it comes to rap, so I'm not the best choice for the endeavor. It's funnier than Wheeling Jesuit University. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 02:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Even though when forced to chose between the police and drug dealers, I usually take the side of the drug dealers, I have to admit the line "Fuck you right back!" is damn funny. And while the rest of the article does need improvement, I can only say this: "Shee-yut! You can't be havin' no Uncyclopedia widout an article 'bout Niggaz Wid Attitudes, Mothafuckaz" --Naughtius MaximusF@HWoof! MeowMUN 04:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Has enough jokes to save it from death, I think. ~CaputosistheHorrible18:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Why not merge VFD with VFH then?--SwamiA. Suresh 12:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I said we can, not that we are. We're just demolishing most of the pages that yaddayaddayadda. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
It's not great, but it's no candidate for VFD. This is not crap. VFD is for crap. Ergo, this page shouldn't be here. If there was a page for nominating meh this would be there. But there isn't. So it's not. Not there. Modusoperandi 12:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree. It just needs to be rewritten with the random nonsense removed. --Sbluen 15:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay, does anyone know how this should be rewritten? I'm just mindful of the "Get Better or Else" policy stated on the VFD page. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 01:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
First, you can fix the typos and some red links. Then, you can replace the references to the overused people with references to Michael Jackson. --Sbluen 03:42, 13 June 2006
I say keep it, it needs a rewrite and expand at the most.--Wit (tawk) 04:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
Delete
I dunno... I mean.. it's just... you know? Don't get me wrong it could be worse, but man, it could be a whole lot better, you know? User:TD 02:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
*Shove this article down the drain. --Sbluen 02:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete: The issue here is not whether or not it is VFH material, it is whether or not it sucks monkey balls. And yes, it does. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
...because those saying "keep" are in fact not doing anything about the article. -- Colonel Swordman 14:42, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
This is fucking brilliant. Respected uncyclopedians at play. I love this article. And the normal talk page is pretty good. Two thumbs up. User:TD 01:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. It's part of the joke.--Wit (tawk) 04:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I know we're not supposed to nominate talk pages, but 1) It's a talk:talk: page, 2) The shutups have been resolved, rendering the page pointless. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 05:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Found this while clearing out NRVs, and turns out that was improperly tagged. It's too old for autohuff, so let's give it a trial. —HinoaKUN(talk) 22:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
The immature and random humor is not good. --Sbluen 23:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I swear I read this article before... and I'm shocked that I didn't NRV it, or put it up for VFD. Oh well, that's one mistake I can correct! TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 01:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Unfortunately, most articles in they keyboard template are like this. I forsee a review of each, before too long. ~CaputosistheHorrible18:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
If it weren't for all the redlinks, I'd be on the fence, but those crimson characts sway me so much sometimes...~CaputosistheHorrible18:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh my LORD! Abortion for this article. This is an abomination againt all which is holy! TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC) (Yes, I am intentionally copying my own words here. Again)
What a pan-fried waste of an article..--Wit (tawk) 04:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Disgusting... there isnt even an exclamation point after 'run' in the first paragraph. --Mrfrence 18:27, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
What's this...Vanity? Either way its total crap.--Wit (tawk) 04:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I should have tagged this article with {{NRV}} instead of {{deadend}}. This article is only one week old and it wouldn't be good even after it has links. The pictures also aren't good and they should be deleted if this article is deleted. --Sbluen 08:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I'll step up to the plate here, and risk my uncyclopedia privileges. I NRV'd the article, and removed the VFD tag. It's not worth voting on. This is utter gobshite. Utter. User:TD 01:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
As discussed above, voting closed. This article is not VFD material, and is being dealt with quickly and efficiently. ~CaputosistheHorrible18:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Further, it has been deleted by Tompkins. ~ Simulacrum Caputosis 18:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
This is a great concept. It's full of potential. You could go in so many directions with this... unfortunately, "into the toilet" is not the right direction to go. I just got a +1 to cynicism, and a -1 to my Faith in Humanity. Flush it. User:TD 01:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Soak it in Gasoline and Torch it.--Wit (tawk) 04:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
If I may, I'm going to try and re-write this horrid abortion of an article. Methinks I can salvage 'er, mateys. Yarr! 01:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I think now TD rewrote it the article is fine.--Rataube 12:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Burn as per nom for Fixed-Wing aircraft, except when I was an IP. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
*I can forsee this article will be deleted.--Rataube 00:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC).
Comments
Rewriting stage 1 is completed. I am not sure where to go from the current state, but it is at least better than it was in the past. User:TD 01:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Please, keep, archive, remove listing, and CLEAN UP VFD! ~CaputosistheHorrible14:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
The article needs a few more links to Ninjas--SwamiA. Suresh 16:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
I applaud the effort of trying to create a unified storyline, but Vegeteria was bad, and this just isn't going to help. User:TD00:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Abolish! Making use of Uncyclopedia's own memes all at the same time does not make a good article. One saving grace: No Chuck Norris jokes. Still, that will only keep me from NRV'ing it. --User:TD 01:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Kill. It's got some potential, but in it's current form, lacks lucidity and prosaic flow. Best to scrap everything here, start with a clean slate. I say huck the thing, and when inspiration strikes some lucky member, let them start fresh. --User:TD 01:09, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Somebody rewrite it, starting with the phrase "An orphan, he was discovered as an infant under a pool table in a Liverpool pub in a cardboard tube with the words 'Kills bacteria that cause Bad Breath' written on the side." I'd do it myself, but I have big important things to be doing.--Spin 19:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. I like it... I get the joke, and I don't see any reason why we can't keep it... The similarities to misleading aren't ignorable, but with the titles being so different, I think the joke is capable of surviving. In this instance, I say Mercy. --User:TD 01:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
This is a copy of the misleading page and the author asked me to huff it in my talk page. --Sbluen 00:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
recinded. What do you guys think of this article? ~ Simulacrum Caputosis 20:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments
I dunno, It's hard to guess here, I mean, a fat redneck with target shirt and shotgun... you don't get to see that every day, but then, I fell in love with Duel Masters. That was fuckin' brilliant. It got huffed, it was written by a retard, but chronarion liked it too... meh. Abstain, for now. User:TD 00:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
I don't find Fisher Price funny either. Or Euroipods. Or even Oscar Mayer. But unfunny to me isn't the same as deletable. (In fact I find SysRq a bit funnier than the three other. It at least has a few jokes I understand.) --SwamiA. Suresh 18:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm a Deletionist, and I vote Keep. It's not gutbuster, but I've seen far more abhorrent travesties of creativity here. User:TD 00:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
mabye I'm just a mean, humourless, sour guy, but I don't find this funny. ~CaputosistheHorrible13:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Because I'm a deletionist, I'm going to vote BURN! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry you don't like this article. Crazyswordsman 03:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
LOL! You Translate it! --PiOfFive 15:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
This article should be featured after it is completed and the parts that aren't funny are removed. --Sbluen 23:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Binary is inherently funny, as long as it's only done in moderation.TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC) But if anyone writes another page on binary, we kill them, and ban their mother.
Delete the article on binary? What are you smoking? And where can I get it? —HinoaKUN(talk) 22:00, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Huh? You want to smoke something that's makes you miserable and causes you to lose your sense of humor? I like to smoke things that make me feel good! --Naughtius MaximusF@HWoof! MeowMUN 22:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
What hurts my eyes is the insertion of a template that's not in binary in this article (the vfd template). Way to deface it! --Naughtius MaximusF@HWoof! MeowMUN 12:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Ahh, my eyes will explode if I look at this article again! --123Fat123 02:47, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
I think a delete vote from Ghelae should count 0,5. And a keep vote 1,5.--SwamiA. Suresh 09:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
And I think that if you're just here bitching and not voting, I will ban you for wasting time and space. That goes for the rest of you too. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 14:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
And Famine seems grumpy. There are no sections; there is no table of contents;it also has a plethora of Oscar Wilde references and irrational dates. For what it's worth, I move that we delete "review" all the articles in Template:Internet-Speak. I believe it will be found that most are not worthy of staying. ~CaputosistheHorrible18:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Abortion Please. It's missing something. That something is called "lack of being shitty". TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 04:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
