This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
Grind into Dog food, then Burn User:TD 03:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete* Or move to: Santa clause's existence in full
Comments
The author can't spell "Minnesota". Rather than correcting it, I think we're best served by simply throwing away the attempt. User:TD 03:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Appears to be devoid of any vanity, and since I am from the same state, many of the jokes are funny to me, as I suspect they would be to many people in the upper mid-west. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 05:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
KeepTDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Go away.----OEJ 03:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Made me laugh, and I've been pretty damn heartless with Uncyclopedia articles in the past, so that's an accomplishment. TDComplain hereMUN(Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I found it a funny page regardless, one that seems more focused on mocking the liberal basis of most college institutions more than anything. Maybe keep while just removing a few obvious vanity sections?Secondwhiteline 05:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
This is not vanity. Period. Again, this is a well-known institution in the US, and the material is appropriate for a satire of it. A good rule of thumb here is that if a printed encyclopedia would have an article on it, it is never vanity merely because of its subject. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 06:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Not a terribly good page, but this is a college that a real encyclopedia would have to have a page on and there is some material that could be used by future authors. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 05:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Ok, but needs expansion and tidying. •Spang•☃•talk• 15:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Vanity school page. (Hope I'm using the new page code rite.) (Fuck, I was not.) ----OEJ 03:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Ok, I admit I haven't heard of this college, but there is nothing here that constitutes vanity. It is short, but actually has humor value. ---Rev. Isra(talk) 06:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
It passed the "I can actually read all the way through it" test with flying colors. It sucks, but it has originality and charm. --Spin 16:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
this article could've been good if it wasn't so bad. someone rewrite the idea good, add something about the timeline, like when the cavemen die other soldiers disapear cos they were never born anymore. - jack mort |cunt| talk - 14:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Lacks proper grammor and is not funny.--123Fat123 16:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
VFDing this as there seems to be a dispute (22 reverts today or so). NOTE: Please do not close this VFD until tuesday unless there is a clear consensus, as the two parties involved are banned for 24 hours. --Splaka 05:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
again just move it to his userpage where it belongs - jack mort |cunt| talk - 14:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Submitter is candidate for Gobshite of the month award for May. This page should stay until june 1:st to simplify voting process. --SwamiA. Suresh 03:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
What a waste of 30 seconds of my life that was.Still cheered me up, at least i'm not the unfunniest article writer here.--Usewho'sname? 10:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
It's not that bad, i'm gonna slap a picture on it and expand it, so hold off killing it for the minute - jack mort |cunt| talk - 13:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Short, unfunny and too old to be NRV'd. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Donno... was deleted by an NRV expiry.. but I personally think it's worthy. Since this is the rpoper NRV removal process, and because ZB told me to, I decided to post it here. t o m p k i n s blah.ﺞوﻦוףהՃՄண்ஸފއހวอฏม+տtrade websites 01:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
It's satire. Not great parody, but good enough to not need VFD. Don't you remember going to school with this guy? The one with the badly thought out idea that he thought was deep shit? Modusoperandi 17:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Check the talk page, it's extremely in dry humor. You know, the kind that whacks you over the head.--Moogle.EXE 17:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Because it's my page Because it's parody. If any of you have ever been to a sprite comic forum you know exactly what I'm talking about. --Hobelhouse 19:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I found this whilt cleaning out the wanted categories. I would have NRV'd it, but it was to old. --ZB 17:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Comments
The article was created May 20, 2006. So I have a question for you: Do you like your words fried or baked? NRVd, voting closed.–H. 17:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
What? Are you commenting on my "Delete reason in a can" method? --ZB 00:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
No, I'm just asking how you want to eat your words. —HinoaKUN(talk) 13:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
It's not a real important subject, the people who most view this site probably think he's a real person. --Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Wait, you're saying he's not a real person? --Spin 23:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Came across this one while cleaning out NRVs. Technically, it shouldn't have been NRVd in the first place (as it's too old). So, I leave it to you, the voters of Uncyc, to judge for yourselves. —HinoaKUN(talk) 14:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Der Richter Und Sein Henker, Ich bin der Richter, die Adminses sind die Henker;-) You guys are the hangmen!--Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
And after that embarassing mess below, I think I'll sign on. —HinoaKUN(talk) 15:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Comments
This article should have been NRVed. It is now NRVed. Please check to see if an article is NRV-worthy before adding it to VFD in the future. Voting closed.–H. 14:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Memo to self: Check history before NRVing. Carry on.–H. 14:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
This is terrible. Almost a year old and it hasn't significantly changed/nor does anyone care to. Tags are would be pointless here. --Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 20:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Too short. Exterminate. —HinoaKUN(talk) 01:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
This article is as short as NRV articles and it has red links and a spelling mistake. --Sbluen 02:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
NRVed, voting closed.–H. 01:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Okay, I'll grant you a trial. By the way, I'm an admin here, so quit with the mouthing off or I'll ban you. —HinoaKUN(talk) 13:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Wahey.... thanks Mr Hinoa4, I'll try to do you proud, you see if I don't. (Doffs cap, backs away respectfully)
Somebody has gone to a lot of trouble to write this. This Hinoa4 is really getting on my tits. I know the page is shite, but it IS in keeping with all the other shite here, especially the shite written by Hinoa4. I vote "Keep It", it bulks up the page count. --Frogturd 12:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep your shite up and I'm banning you. —HinoaKUN(talk) 13:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Appears to be vanity, but I'm not sure so... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Too bloggy for my taste. Die. —HinoaKUN(talk) 01:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
It's just dumb, it's been around for nearly a year, no one rewrote it, it isn't an important topic...trash it. --Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Why not edit it and make it funnier then? This show deserves to be mocked. That's all I'm saying. I say let it stay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byThenickelmanisme (talk • contribs) at 17:52 EDT, 20 May 2006
Agree. This should deserve a rewrite.--Jtaylor1 06:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
It has been told to merge with Jar Jar Binks, but I don't think it has any redeeming value; it's mostly an opinion and a recycled SNL reference. It should be made into a redirect for the other page. --epynephrin 19:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I agree it's not good, but it's not terrible. ~Cap'nSimzorzAr, Matey! 15:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Because it's dumb, it's a vanity page, and it's creator has been adding crap Nuke Sword/vanity references to every page he edits. If you can't be funny, just read, don't edit. Or better yet, learn how to be funny, then come back and edit. Modusoperandi 17:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
I've seen what you put about him/her/it/aardvark in the ban patrol and I agree. Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Banned user for spreading self-referential vanity links. Deleted links. Article should go too. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 21:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
CVP this vanity because it will keep on getting recreated.--Jtaylor1 09:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I absorbed the idea into my article. Now you can destroy it. —HinoaKUN(talk) 21:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I thought this was deleted a while ago. Apparently not. ~Cap'nSimzorzAr, Matey! 16:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Removed from vfd as it was kept the last time it was VFD'd. See Archive 34 if you care. Not that there's much there to see. SirFamine,Gun♣Petition» 21:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
It's not about anyone I've ever heard of but it doesn't really seem to be vanity either. It's well enough written, might as well leave it be. - jack mort |cunt| talk - - 21:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete
Few google results and no en.wp, but it seems slightly non-vanity? --Splaka 06:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Weak delete I don't really think google results have anything to do with humor, but the thing just isn't funny in my opinion. Maybe it should be moved to where Simulacrum says.--George VI 01:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Comments
This should be moved to University_of_Cambridge/MuhammadSafiee ~Cap'nSimzorzAr, Matey! 15:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
whoever wrote this, the teacher probably doesn't even like you, just thinks you're wierd, bet you think about him when you wank...... - jack mort |cunt| talk - - 21:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Perhaps if there was a page for his school this could be moved under it. ~Cap'nSimzorzAr, Matey! 15:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I've just read this article through three times and I still don't even know what it's about, but i love it anyway. - jack mort |cunt| talk - - 21:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep I have to agree, I think there's a place for some nonsense humor, and this is decent as they go. --George VI 01:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete
It could just be that I don't understand this... but I don't think there's any humor to be found. Not horrible, just... void... of funny. --Legion 23:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Sounds eerily like a video game. I don't get it, either... —HinoaKUN(talk) 03:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
