# Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive34

Jump to: navigation, search

## Ryan Chan Chun Hei

• Vanity? Funny enough to keep? I think delete or at least move to user space, but there may be some who might want it kept. Spang 14:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Added VFD template because Spang apparently can't read the directions for VFDing. Who gets to ban him for that? Anyway, I'm pretty much tempted to delete this shite on sight, but I'll let token voting happen to preserve the illusion that I care about how users vote. 14:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Cock. It's a while since I've done this. And I did read the rules, twice. Just forgot to do the tag. Spang 14:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Famine's delete on sight instinct plus my delete on sight instinct are enough to trump this farcical democracy. --Spin 01:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• I say smashy. It's vanity, and that's really reason enough for me. If not, then just general unfunnyness will have to do. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - My gawd, what the hell? It's always sad to see something like this... someone obviously spent a shit-ton of hours working on what is merely humourless vanity. Isn't there a Craptasticpedia where they could flock to and be with their own kind? --Imrealized 02:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• I say it's okay. it's obviously NOT vanity (who in their right mind would write THAT about themselves?!) but maybe that's because i happen to know who this person is. --sqsz 13:20, 21 April 2006
• Huff - I couldn't care less about this article, and I don't see why it would have any redeeming value to anyone. I don't mind if the article is not gonna be deleted, but maybe deleting it would be a good way of telling this guy he really has to start writing better articles. Even I can do better than this. -- User:PBz0r 12:22 (GMT +1), 21 April 2006
• Move it to the user space... probably the best place for all that relatively pointless work. Bloopy 10:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Move to User Space - it's the best thing for it. ~ 12:51, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Deleted --Spin 01:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

## Concentration camps

*Final Solution. In the spirit of the Holidays! Theo 11:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. And move it back to Jews as soon as this reskin is over.--Rataube 15:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Though, it would be funny if only half of the article was moved back. (Then again, I have a sick sense of humor, so ignore me.) — 16:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but delete Hinoa.-- 02:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

• This nomination was a joke because of the front page. Page has been moved back to Jews and I'll remove the VFD tag. (If someone actually wants the page deleted they can re-nom it) Spang 07:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

## Pine Cone

*Voting Open. This page is unedited since December, and not funny. Please either help or kill it. --00:09, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

• I'll take smashy. Clearly someone has a beef with the Nobel foundation. The thing is, nobody cares. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's actually pretty funny. If you don't like it, you're just a big mean dummy. --Spin 04:42, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• If you love it, Save its life for in one day, I shall crush it beneath my heel. 14:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Are we allowed to vote NRV? If not, delete. I think it could be saved, but I wouldn't give it more than a week.-- 03:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Huff, or please someone expand it, even though I don't see how - I'm sorry for the guy who wrote this, but I think it took him no more than ten seconds to write this. Didn't the beginner's guide say something about articles written in ten seconds? -- User:PBz0r 12:32 (GMT +1), 21 April 2006
• Demolish or Extreme Rewrite, as per above delete votes. ~ 12:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry I left this so long. Taken care of. 01:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

## Bill Fitchburg

*Voting Open on this suspected vanity page. -- 14:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete.--Jtaylor1 23:09, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! Too many pictures, not enough text and funny, and vanity besides. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 15:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

User wrote "Initially it was an inside joke, but I'm making an attempt to mainstream it to be funny" last november. No user edits at all since early Dec., so I'm assuming that it won't get improved. Adios, Billy. 23:51, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

## John Orr

• Voting Open on this suspected vanity page. -- 14:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! Quite simply, vanity should be reason alone, but if that's not the case, then I'll go with "that face on the right creeps me out" for \$200, Alex. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 23:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Slandanity calls for sinkage. -- 23:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Smells like vanity. Not funny.--Rataube 16:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Deleted Blatant vanity. --Spin 04:45, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

## Jash

*Delete. This page is a copy of the en.wp article with only minor additions. -- 22:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Remember the Rules for VFD. I don't it's copied from a wikipedia article.--Jtaylor1 23:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Deleted. Same exact article on wikipedia started at about the same time by a user of the same name...and it sucks. Don't know which came first, but I know which one got deleted first. 15:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

## Ethnocentrism

*Delete bad grammar, bad spelling, and as the author says, "it sounds like some ignorant talking absolute nonsense." Marjzilla 19:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)marjzilla

• Keep. It's written in a very ethnocentric style (ie. Overpatriotic American). And it's funny. — 20:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite This article is a really good idea that just doesn't work, somehow. I don't think it's acceptable as is, but I see what the author is trying to do, and a little more work on it could get it there.-- 20:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm still not sure how "rewrite" fits into the Keep Delete dichotomy. --Spin 13:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
It means keep and add the `{{rewrite}}` tag. -- 22:00, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
...and keep, I assume? I think the primary "vote" in this case should be "keep," with the recommendation of a rewrite tag mentioned in the comment so as to avoid confusion. I'll make a VD post so as not to unduly clutter this vote.--Spin 04:37, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Actually, the best way to go about this is to vote "keep" and then edit the page to add a {{rewrite}} tag. --Sir gwax (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite under above mentioned terms. -- 16:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I don't know if the vote of the author counts, but I think I'd better put my two cents in. First of all, the original reasons given for making this VFD were things I did on purpose, and if you read just about any other article I've written (they can be linked to on my user page) you'll see that I don't usually write like this. I was mildly influenced by the style the recently featured Teenager in which the voice of the article is a narrow-minded individual. I mean, the guy has totally misunderstood the word he is definining! "How ironic!" Rewriting this to make it sound/look more "intelligent" would totally take away the joke. Adding to it in a consistent way would be fine, but I feel strongly that this should not be deleted or rewritten. I'm glad some people did get it, anyway. --So So 16:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - This article is 1 out of every 5 Americans I know (and probably 9 out of 10 in The South). I think with a bit of work this could be an excellent article, but personally don't see a rewrite tag as necessary; there are many less humourous and more poorly written articles than this floatin' about. Of course, it is still 4/20 and my judgement may be slightly impaired. --Imstoneded 02:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite - Being European, I didn't like this article because it was too much of American Ethnocentrism, but actually, the idea of making an article on Ethnocentrism that is Ethnocentristic (is that a word...?) is quite funny (like brevity, redundancy etc.). However, the execution is a little poor, the writer tries to make fun by adding motherfucker randomly. I'd like to see someone rewrite it. -- User:PBz0r 12:39 (GMT +1), 21 April 2006
• Keep. Bloopy 10:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, a good example of self-reference (good self-refeence???) ~ 12:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

After throwing out the non-American votes, this article is +3 keep. So we're keeping it. The rest of y'all uncivilized baboons can go to hell. 18:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

## Jesus Christmas

*Please...I've tried once to huff this - and was told I couldn't because of an NRV template I put on it some two weeks ago. Nothing has happened to it, so I want this gone for 2 reasons: 1. The Jesus thing is getting really old. 2. The author (some anonymous fag) even wrote that he is just trying to waste "invaluable space". Aside from this, it is just mindless crap. Das Boot 09:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Rewrite. Ugly and messy and unkeepable as is, but this COULD potentially be good, if it didn't suck so much.-- 09:44, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Utter, unsalvagable crap. sink it. -- 23:51, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! "Hello. I see the assassins have failed." Article is a desperate attempt to be funny with overdone Jesus material. Can you have burnt sushi? Can you? User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 23:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Very, very messy. Disgusting attempt to be funny by using Jesus. Spelling mistakes and one line section? Dry... Hire some terrorists to destroy it--Wahoo 04:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Rewritten as requested. 14:09, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

## Uncyclopedia:Uncyclopedia Is Not My Job

*Delete Unnecessary, elitist and unwelcoming, particularly as it is in the Uncyclopedia: namespace. At the very least it should be moved to the main article space. This is not the way Uncyc should be portrayed to users. —rc (t) 02:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Move to user space, as it isn't policy, terribly funny, nor consensus opinion of the admins.-- 02:21, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep in some incarnation. I used to administrate a moderately small RPG forum, and every point in there I agree with totally. You could make a somewhat "nicer" version as policy, as this one is pretty cranky. Or you could just say that it's covered by "Don't Give the Admins Lip" and throw it out into the cold world of the main namespace. — 02:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but move somewhere outside the project: namespace as there is no established consensus to adopt this as policy. Perhaps user-fy? --Carlb 02:48, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Moved To Keitei's space. Left redirect for time being. 03:10, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, hmm. I forgot about this one. It's not mean, gosh. It's just that I'm not paid and I'm bitter. But whatever. I forgot it existed. --KATIE!! 04:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

## Monkeynet

This article should have been tagged NRV, the quality of this article is not ambiguous enough to justify using VFD. The article has been marked NRV. Further nominations of this sort of article will be considered abuses of VFD. Voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 03:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

## NBA

• I say to huff because of lack of content and complete of unfunny content. --The Insane Velair Wight 22:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• LIST! GAHHH! SMASHY!!! User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 22:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Kill. I hate the NBA, and this article captures my feelings perfectly, by having no value whatsoever.-- 22:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this and do it quickly Dame  23:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Mhaille has deleted this, so apparently voting is closed. --19:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Amen, Brother. --

## Brandon Steele

 Keep Delete Smells like factual nnp vanity. No en.wp, but lots of google hits. --Splaka 05:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Comments Deleted with extreme prejudice. No en.wp article, google hits unrelated to the person in question, pictures correspond with given birthdate, not funny, self-promotion, etc. --KATIE!! 06:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

## Lazy Object Oriented Programming

 Keep Yeah, just a one-liner, but since I actually wrote something in a program similar to that once, I have to vote to keep it. 22:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC) I think it's funny and worth keeping. Bloopy 00:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC) This is hilarious. Put something on it that says, "I'm hilarious. Don't NRV me, n00b!"-- 12:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Oh, you mean {{noGwax}}? And keep. — 15:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Delete Okay, so i get the joke, but it's a figurative one liner (I realize it is two lines of code) and really doesn't add value... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 21:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Comments Sorry, Not VFD Material. If it's a one-liner, use QVFD.--Jtaylor1 12:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC) I put it in QVFD because I was told it wasn't VFD material due to its age... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 17:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

## Cahmpion

 Keep Delete --Nytrospawn 19:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC) --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 20:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC) — 20:01, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Comments This is an old, unfinished article about a MySpace band that appears to be copied from MySpace. It also has a very expired maintenance tag. -- 18:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC) I have no mercy. 20:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

## Dissociative_Identity_Disorder

 Keep It's clever enough. It could be more...not obvious, but accessible. —rc (t) 18:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Eh, doesn't suck too horribly. — 19:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC) I love the whole idea. Pure genius. (additional info in comments) --⇔ 20:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Yeah, it's a little hard to really get at...dunno what could be done to fix that tho. 20:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Keep. Anyone who doesn't get this joke is a Communist.-- 17:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Delete Placed here only because I was told it couldn't be NRVed or QVFDed. I don't see what is particularly clever about it. -- 18:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC) She's a Witch! BURN HER!!!! --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 18:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Comments People, make sure you check the revisions in the history before you vote... —rc (t) 18:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC) I did... and the history wasn't very good... AGP Taylor couldn't make sense of that crap --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 18:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC) I've deleted it all and then restored the edits So So originally intended to have on there and protected. As a result the VFD template is gone, but doesn't mean I'm breaking VFD rules... You may still huff if so decided. --⇔ 20:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Thanks to MoneySign the article is as it was originally supposed to be now. All I ask is to look at it one more time before you vote. Oh, and the "articles" within are essentially throwaway. I would never write shit like that in earnest. That's my say. --So So 14:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

## Fmt

 Keep I, for one, was amused. — 15:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Delete I realise our mission has something to do with being content free, but I don't think it means this free... maybe I'm wrong... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 15:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC) it's kind of like Proper Wiki Formatting but less funny. much less. --neko 18:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC) This page is like a wack-a-mole: Huff it one place and it will pop up another. Please, keep the moles from overrunning us. -- 18:28, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Against. Now I'm tempted to make a Media:Example.ogg just to screw with anyone that forgets to do it right...-- 18:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC) More like... Fmcrap... --⇔ 20:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Comments Uhm... I deleted it thinking it was another one of those "press every button several times"-articles... Need I restore it? --⇔ 20:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

## Dennis john morrison

 Keep Delete Ugly, crap, possibly vanity, but just "wacky" nonsense. Ugh. -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 09:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC) It's not even good vanity... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 15:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Yep. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Where's my hammer... User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 20:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Comments I'm not going to bother voting; it's already NRV'd. — 15:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC) It is an expired NRV which shouldn't have been placed there. Processing expired NRVs is how this was found. -- 18:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Fine, have it your way. — 20:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

## Destroy Uncyclopedia

 Keep Delete Unfunny cabal-styled humor... I will also accept a move to userpage. --⇔ 19:31, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Not funny, even if you were there. And I was. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 19:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Move it to QDB, it belongs there, not here, but I like the UnNews interview idea. --Olipro Co-Anc (Harass) 19:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Move to QDB. Cctoide 19:38, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Comments I'm for converting some of the ideas in to a real article.Theo 19:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Voting ended. Moved to some user page (well, code has been copied to some user page).

## Essay

 Keep Taken from NRV. Probably questionable, but Keep 'cause the formatting & content made me laugh. --DWIII OUN CUN 13:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC) I actually found this one rather amusing... why does that worry me?--Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 23:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Free the Electrons 21:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Delete Not really that funny. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 19:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Destroy. Long article does this better. --The Rt. Hon. 19:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Delete. Good idea, but not well executed at all. If the author were to put {{construction}} on it, it might be worth saving, otherwise, huff.-- 00:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Joe Shit the Rag Man

 Keep Delete Delete. This is definitely vanity. 670,000 google hits and no en.wp article.--Jtaylor1 09:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Comments This is NOT vanity. This is a fictional character based on a perspective of homeless people (not one homeless person in particular). It's not a great article, so I will not remove this nomination. But its reason is incorrect (and kind of funny how you actually Google- and Wikipedia-searched). --⇔ 09:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Sorry about that.--Jtaylor1 09:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Perhaps not deletable, but unamusing.--Winston 10:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Everything is deletable. I have proved that beyond a doubt. 21:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

## 0x0000576f7274686c6573732043726170

 Keep OMG I can't believe you guys don't get it... well actually neither do I, and I know this doesn't make much sense now that it's gone... but we've allowed other nonsense in the past... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 23:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Delete Delete. We were debating whether this had any humor value on IRC, so I plopped it here. Hope Gwax doesn't hate me now.-- 21:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Delete! I don't get it, and I don't really want to get it.. 21:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Smashy! Cannot be understood. It looks like a memory address, but it's not funny. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 23:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC) delete I might have voted to keep if it had the translation. I'm sure R2-D2 would laugh his robot ass off at this, but us humans can't read it Modusoperandi 23:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Delete--Rataube 00:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Comments Apparently that memory address is now null. 00:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

## Junior College of New Zealand

 Keep Delete We need our page deleted (and history) because our school is chasing us down and someone is going to turn us in - and the school does not take into acount the bill or rights or freedom of speech. It appears some people do not have a sense of humour. Alas. PLEASE! - deletion - Beepbeep 05:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Already been done by Tompkins. Again, sorry to hear about it. I guess voting was never really open in the first place... — 05:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Comments Emergency Deletion. Yell at me if you must... 05:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Junior College of NaZi-ealand! Maybe a copy of this article belongs on ED. Bloopy 09:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

## Kingdom Alaska

 Keep God, we've got worse crap on uncyclopedia, and you're squabbling over this?! --The Rt. Hon. 19:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Someone put a lot of work into this, so what if it is marginally funny ti wouldn't be fair to their feeeeeeeeeelings --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 23:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Kind of Keep, yaaawn -- Swami A. Suresh 09:24, 25 April 2006 (UTC) Delete Seems inane and rather worthless. They've been around for a while, but almost all the edits are by one guy.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC) I left a note on the user's talk page to merge all of it into one page. That was, um, Wednesday, I think. Smashy, unless there's a damn good reason why he hasn't. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 23:25, 22 April 2006 (UTC) I stand corrected--he's working on merging some. Vote withdrawn. — 00:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Delete.--Winston 10:21, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Shit cannon

 Keep There are bits in this, here and there, which are funny, but they're lost in a mire of random word generation. Rather than killing it I'd rather see someone tear it to bits and rebuild it better, like steve austin. If no one can be fucked to rewrite it then delete - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:29, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Delete -- 19:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC) I just don't find it funny. --Johnfn 19:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC) I think this page should go. (Wasn't it VHF yesterday? WTF?) Modusoperandi 02:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC) It fits this page a lot better.-- 04:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Delete. --DWIII OUN CUN 10:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Comments Reason for tagging: Dead-end topic, content is two lists, attempts at random humour (and failed ones) -- 19:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

## Lugermania

 Keep Delete --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 21:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC) too fanboy --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 21:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC) I cannot support this. Alas, and I do hate to see things deleted. 22:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Wow. I thought I knew horrible. --KATIE!! 01:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Is this actually a real event, i mean the whole article's factual isn't it? seems a shame to delete it cos someone put fucking effort into writing it, just move it to en.wikipedia surely? unless that's where it came from in the first place - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Comments It looks like irritatingly nonnotable meme.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 21:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Did you forget the VFD template? Bloopy 08:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC) Taken care of. -- 19:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

## The Contortionists

 Keep keep: I'm one of the people involved in putting up that page. It did go overboard today though with all the pics etc. I have removed the direct link to the band website and removed the band member photos. --User:Deedee 14.27, 26 April 2006 As it is now, I can give it a keep. Needs work in the funny line, but not overy vanity-filled anymore. 21:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC) The pictures and outside links are gone now, to the point that i didn't realise it was about a 'real' band. Some of the jokes are probably in-jokes that people not of the band wouldn't get, but I still found it funny, and that's what's important, surely - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Delete About a real (non-notable) band, full of photos of nnp's; but to be fair, trying to be Uncyclopedic. Still vanity though, and I say Baleet. -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 10:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Delete, see also: Jesus Hendrix...--SubPOP 11:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Conditional delete. I'd actually be fine with this one if they didn't have a link to the band's real site.-- 12:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Vomit --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 17:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Comments yeah, definitely shouldn't be marked vanity. -- 19:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

## Psychic

 Keep While I'm usually a delete kind of guy, this isn't bad, and has plenty of untapped potential. 02:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC) It's more of a stub than something for vfd. Plus I put that picture of Uri there...it's worth keeping just for that. Modusoperandi 02:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC) What's there is good, it doesn't need {vfd} it needs {construction} - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Yeah. It could use some expansion. — 03:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC) It's got loads of potential. Have added a bit a lot, and I really want to have very much enjoyed having a go at Uri Geller --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 23:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Delete You can only laugh at it for it's stupidness--123Fat123 01:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Sorry, Famine. This is definitely stupid. Huff it.--Jtaylor1 02:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Yeah whatever, too short to be funny. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 09:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC) But you're short, and people laugh at you. No wait, was that out loud? Don't hit Save page, don't hit Save page, don't hit... Modusoperandi 14:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Comments I have rewritten almost all of this page and added stuff to it.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 13:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

## Vanity page

 Keep I had no idea this existed. I feel like such a loser... 01:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Sure, it could be done better, but it's not that bad.--KATIE!! 01:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Has a long tradition of keepiness here, and I'd like to see that continued. 02:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Psh... You can't delete my articles no matter how much they suck. I'm too special for that. --Spin 03:50, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Hahahaha! keep! if it was genuine gibberish vanity I could understand wanting it gone but it's clearly a satire - jack mort | cunt | talk - 11:24, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Keep! Funny! -- Miserable Failure 00:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC) --Rataube 00:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Delete --123Fat123 01:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC) -- 01:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Lose the 1337 shit and I might reconsider. --EvilZak 02:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC) As per above. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 09:20, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Comments

## George X. H. W. Bush

 Keep Delete Once upon a time I wrote a funny article here and it got deleted. Then apparently someone followed a red link to the gaping hole where it used to be and wrote a version that's way, way worse. My preference would be to have my awesome version restored, but either way I propose putting this... thing... out of my its misery. --Slats Dalrymple 01:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Concur. --George VI 05:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Demolish ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 09:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC) HOW IS IT PEOPLE KEEP TELLING UNFUNNY JOKES ON SUCH A FUNNY SUBJECT!??!! ::calms down::-- 23:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Randomish shite.--Winston 16:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Nintendo_69

 Keep Delete Whacked the useless category, left two articles for consideration. I consider this one deletable. Please recomment on each. 15:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC) I agree. Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Nipples pass for humour these days? Oi! Modusoperandi 16:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC) This one actually made me yawn... --George VI 18:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Interstate 69

 Keep Whacked the category, left two articles for consideration. I consider this one salvagable. Please recomment on each. 15:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Concept has potential. --George VI 18:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Delete I say delete. It was $69+stub=, where $<=worse_.than$ You see? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Hold me, I'm scared (shiver). Modusoperandi 16:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Ugh. No. Just no. — 22:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC) If you think this concept has potential, you might want to wait until it's deleted and then start a decent article from scratch. Bloopy 08:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Agreed, article as it is is not very good. --George VI 23:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Put it on "requested articles", and I think you've can kill this one.-- 23:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC) --Winston 16:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments I don't think it's a AAAAAAAAA! clone. I think this needs to be rewritten.--Jtaylor1 15:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC) ??? I never said it was, I said it was worse than an AAAAAAAAA! clone. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

## Stoner High School

 Keep I have no idea either, but I chuckled. Even if it should be vanity, it is fair enough.-- Swami A. Suresh 07:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC) Yeah I admit it's my article but I think the humour is generalizable enough that most people would get something out of it. --George VI 18:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC) I laughed at least once. That puts my vote at automatic keep.-- 23:30, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Vanity tag it. --PiOfFive 18:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Delete It made my head hurt It was too long I didn't laugh --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 20:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments I have no clue what to think of this. However, my primary concern is about the names, and the pictures attached to them. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 07:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC) None of the names, NONE of them, are actual names, or anything even close. All of the names were just made up on the spot, by me, with pictures of people I don't know.George VI 07:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC) I understand, but as current vanity policy forbids full names and pictures, your offering is likely to confuse people who don't understand that yours are made up. If it were me, I wouldn't make a precedent by permitting your article as-is.--Winston 16:24, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

## Wand of Magic, or Magic Wand, or Wand of Magicry, or Magical Wand

 Keep Could be merged with D20 Uncyclopedia and possibly salvaged. It's ugly as all get out, but without the mountain of red links, this might be so bad.-- 23:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Delete Make up your friggin' mind already. --DWIII OUN CUN 19:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Um, no. I'm taking my d20 and going home Modusoperandi 19:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC) — 00:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Demolish. It is probably responsible for many of the pages in Special:Wantedpages. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC) There have been some excellent bits of creative, humourous, historical fiction around here recently. This isn't one.--Winston 16:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Alas thine article doth not belong hither. -- 18:44, 2 May 2006 (UTC) One title, Many Redirects, Dumb-ass --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 20:03, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Was part of the Kingdom Alaska series. I thought I told him to merge that stuff. — 00:15, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

## WWAvsNT

 Keep Delete Incoherent bilge, pointless drivel, waste of space, etc etc etc... --DWIII OUN CUN 18:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC) All these articles seem interconnected, and yes, this one is just babbling that isn't funny, too. Really smells like teen spirit, if teen spirit is some inside joke that nobody gets or cares about.-- 23:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC) — 00:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC) I agree. Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:49, 2 May 2006 (UTC) More nibbled goat root.--Winston 16:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Was part of the Kingdom Alaska series. I thought I told him to merge that stuff. — 00:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

## Danes

 Keep Might be able to merge with Denmark. Possibly salvagable. It wasn't completely devoid of humor.-- 23:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Delete I'm not sure what this was supposed to be, but since it's been out there for a few months, (I think) it can't go in QVFD and doesn't qualify dor NRV, so here it is... and boy does it stink... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 15:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Demolish. Should've been NRV'd immediately. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Danes are cool...Danes is not. Modusoperandi 17:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Bah. — 00:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC) --Winston 16:14, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Tardbusters

 Keep Delete End Too messy to even be vanity.--{{User:Suresh/sig}} 16:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Agree with above. --George VI 18:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Death to the heretic --PiOfFive 19:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Die, die, die! User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 22:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC) That's somewhere between NRV and QVFD material. Either way, BURN IT. --User:Nintendorulez 00:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Bust this tard. Bloopy 08:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Delete Tis' crap.--Count of Monkey Crisco 15:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC) I like to vote too! --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Comments I know the Tardbusters people from another group, this article really doesn't do them justice. -Dzugavili 15:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

## Tarzan

 Keep Delete delete Has nothing to do with Tarzan, also stupid and not funny. MAybe could be renamed as Hairy Ass page.--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Agree. Perhaps a Move and expand? --User:Nintendorulez 01:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Kick its unfunny hirsute butt. --DWIII OUN CUN 13:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Agree with above --George VI 18:27, 3 May 2006 (UTC) poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo poo --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Comments As it exists now, I don't care either way. If it had pics, however, I'd go with delete. Modusoperandi 10:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

## The_dog_dies_at_the_end

 Keep I added a picture. This article just needs a little love, not a bullet to the head.-- 04:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Concept has potential, if someone would like to fix it up. --George VI 05:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC) It needs work, but isn't completely dreadful.--Winston 15:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC) I hate it... but i figured since I had another picture of that dog... it could deserve another go --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC) I like it. --User:Nintendorulez 00:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Delete ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Apparently from en.wp, but I dunno, seems like it needs to be fixed before being keepable. -- 04:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC) What Isra said. — 22:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

## Bore Us Stallin'

 Keep Delete Delete -- 04:20, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Political, and not funny. Can I ask this to be deleted twice?-- 04:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC) ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC) --Winston 15:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Boe-Ring --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Meh. — 22:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Another expired tag where someone seems to have cared but it just went nowhere. -- Rescued from the actual article: "Has potential, but needs formatting and rewording. --Pamelf (22:15 EDT; May 2, 2005)" I dunno if this is a keep or delete, so it goes here. –H. 22:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

## Kimmie Meissner

 Keep Delete Delete -- 02:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC) I see evidence of lots of work, but no funny in sight.-- 03:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC) --Winston 15:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC) vanity / fanboy crap --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC) pages that are too random make me sad (Mr. T, Oscar Wilde, Abraham Lincoln and Sasha Cohen on the same page? How is random funny?). Modusoperandi 20:44, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Okay, we've got the Anachronistic Date, the Mr. T reference, and the Oscar Wilde non-quote reference. That's three surefire indicators of suckitude, and that's just the first sentence or so. Smashy. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 22:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Comments This article has an expired tag that technically makes it huffable without VFD, but it was a close call so I leave the decision to the people. -- 02:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

## Peter Griffin

 Keep Like Peter Griffin, this article deserves yet ANOTHER chance.-- 23:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC) NONONONONONONONONONONO! Pea... Tear... Griffin... this article funny, even if need of rewrite / expansion article --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 20:01, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Delete I failed to laugh at this article. Decapitate for violating HTBFANJS. I know it has a NoQVFD template, but it had its chance to improve, but it didn't. --The Insane Velair Wight 23:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC) I recommend liposuction. — 00:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC) I recommend deletion. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC) --Winston 15:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Baby sandwich

 Keep I can see how someone might find this funny, though I don't claim to myself.-- 20:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Weak keep and rewrite. Funny concept, article needs work. -- 18:41, 2 May 2006 (UTC) The Concept has LOADS of potential... I would love to see this completely rewritten, and re-imaged... but deleted, no --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Strong keep and expand. This find this article funny.--Jtaylor1 02:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Keep, rewrite - Article's not that great, but that image and the premise is. --User:Nintendorulez 00:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Delete Nauseating! --DWIII OUN CUN 19:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Pages that aren't about Chuck Norris (but mention him anyway) must die Modusoperandi 20:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Save the image, delete the rest of it. — 00:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Delete the image, and the rest of it. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Sorry, but I admit I laughed at the image. The article is shite.--Winston 15:59, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Bleeahhh. What is this, humor for abortionists? Get rid of it.  c • > •  03:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Brad is a rebel; he colours outside the lines, man Modusoperandi 20:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Damn straight!-- 20:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

## Grabatron

 Keep Was funny at first, but deteriorated toward the end. It could really do with a picture of that hand-in-a-wheelchair. Great premise, half-decent execution. --User:Nintendorulez 00:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Delete Babbling unfunny nonsense. --DWIII OUN CUN 19:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Yeah, um, I think a random string of words would actually have been funnier.-- 23:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC) And here I was, thinking this was a string of random words. — 00:20, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Take it out back and bust a cap in it. --George VI 05:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC) ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Horrible.--Winston 16:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Charles the IIIrd

 Keep Delete Worthless meandering tripe. --DWIII OUN CUN 19:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC) I was tempted to say keep on this one, since DWIII seems to have it out for this author, but this really is random crap.-- 23:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC) — 00:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC) ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC) I'm with DWIII on this one. Is it too late to tempban/HTBFANJS the writer?--Winston 16:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Pointless. Bloopy 09:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC) While voting to have this erased from the face of human memory, I do feel, paradoxically, that the main author does have talent and should not be discouraged --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 19:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Was part of the Kingdom Alaska series. I thought I told him to merge that stuff. — 00:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

## New Turkey

 Keep Not funny, but this has potential if merged with Turkey, possibly... I don't know. This person seems to have put a lot of work into this, even if it isn't funny.-- 23:41, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Delete Boooorrrriiiinnngggg... --DWIII OUN CUN 19:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC) ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Sadly, the entire Kingdom of Alaska series nibbles goat penis.--Winston 16:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC) The central idea is completely unfunny and it goes downhill from there --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 19:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Euro

 Keep ...and move to the symbol, which needs more content, anyway.-- 23:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Merge with €. — 00:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC) --Winston 16:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC) Delete I'm not sure this article has any value--Rataube 09:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Comments I think it should be merged with €. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 09:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Sorry, but you didn't tag VFD. I had to tag {{expand}}.--Jtaylor1 15:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC) Oh right, I forgot, I tagged € with fix or expand and same with another related article. However I think this one should go straight to the trash, would you mind if I replace the taggs?--Rataube 16:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC) I see there's a general agreement that this should be merged with Euro symbol, but which one? There are two articles (€ and €€) with the euro symbol as the title. Lenin & McCarthy 12:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC) M€RG€ BOTH!!! ~ Ghelæ M€RG€ M€RG€ M€RG€! (should be m€rg€d with random in\$anity)talkcontribs

## Kevin Hodgekiss

 Keep Delete I need help here. Is this vanity or not? If so, huff it.--Jtaylor1 04:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Deleted as vanity. 45 google hits, no wikipedia article, not even funny anyways. --KATIE!! 10:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

## Emo paul chuckle

 Keep Delete The picture that goes with this "treatise" was placed up for VFP, which doesn't look promising, so I followed the link and found this. This article needs to go, and fast. Dame  17:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC) I say the fuckwad who actually thought such a horrible picture would last on VFH deserves a ban for gross stupidity. It violates rule 1 and 2. --User:Nintendorulez 18:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC) It should be a damn NRV or QVFD. The writer should have been aborted. Dzugavili 18:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC) Comments Deleted. 18:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

## Lightbulbs

 Keep Delete This has been tagged as ugly since 3rd MArch, no one has bothered with it, and quite frankly its as funny as piles. FreeMorpheme 01:18, 6 May 2006 (UTC) JUST DEMOLISH! It's UGLY! Why nobody tagged it I have no idea... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 06:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Redirect to Light bulb. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 11:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC) The lightbulb-powered oven joke has already been made at Easy-Bake Oven and was funnier there. Delete. --Carlb 17:28, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Comments This should be merged/redirected to Light bulb. --EvilZak 06:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Agree. --User:Nintendorulez 17:28, 7 May 2006 (UTC) For that, also. But just destroy the content in lightbulbs. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 06:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Light bulb is funnier than Lightbulbs. --George VI 07:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC) Redirected. --KATIE!! 17:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

## Nippon ichi

 Keep Delete -- 19:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Nice to see the word "bouncy" being used - but unfortunately it was surrounded by lots of other words.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 19:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC) is this pokemon? --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 21:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC) I'm thinking this guy picked two words in Japanese ("Japan" and "one"--and I know next to no Japanese) that sounded cool, put them together, then as his creative power was spent, decided to halfquarter-ass the article. — 22:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Demolish, duh. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:26, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Crap.--Jtaylor1 20:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Comments

## The Darth Cult Movement

 Keep Delete Delete, please ~ This is a snorefest of fictitious characters of a tired and trite subject. It's beyond me why people must constantly keep re-inveting new Darths, Hilters, and Jesii when there are so many other subjects to write about. Just to be clear, I'll be deleting Darth Emo, Darth Birdy, Darth Darko, Darth Barfbucket, and any other Darths that become new articles as a result of being hotlinked from this article, but it'd be more direct to chop down this one. ~ T. (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC) DemolishicaterifificationificateAAAAAAAAA! (Delete) ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 19:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Darth Shite -- 20:09, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Delete the redirect that would result from a move to his user page. Poor bastard probably put a lot of effort into it. --⇔ 19:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC) E-Lim-I-Nate E-Lim-I-Nate --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Though it would be much much much funnier with another Oscar Wilde quote --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 19:44, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Woudn't that be a Darth Wilde quote?...and why does the page just say "Hi"? Modusoperandi 17:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Comments

## Raffles 2J dota

 Keep Delete Vanity, and I don't find it funny.--Chinaman 08:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Are there any good vanity pages? Modusoperandi 08:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Agree. --User:Nintendorulez 18:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Bloopy 08:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Best thing for it. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC) put it down before it spreads --Mindsunwound: (NS) Astroglide Diplomacy There 19:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC) /me toys with just deleting it right now — 22:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC) I sympathize, but the humor is just too specific, too many inside jokes. --George VI 05:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Crapity (Crap/Vanity).--Jtaylor1 20:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC) I support the deletion of all vanity pages (that aren't Utar-approved) --⇔ 10:15, 7 May 2006 (UTC) Comments