Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive33

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion
Revision as of 08:38, April 26, 2011 by Fnoodle (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Undead

CHERUB Series

  • Ouch. I think this gave me cancer. --Splaka 09:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Comment: User removed this VFD entry and VFD notice from page. Banned. --Splaka 09:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
You might want to think about a career in adult film then? Oh and kill this. -- Spang talk 11:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Keep LOL, it's almost an inside joke, but REALLY funny if you get it. Leave it alone. Unsigned vote. But if it's what you say it is, it falls under the vanity policy and should be huffed right now... --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 10:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Category:Leon Trotsky Fans

  • Delete. What is the point? -- Spang talk 06:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Keep Pretty funny, almost an inside joke but is an actualy book series he's making fun of. Perfectly fine.

Another almost inside joke? Oh, that's ok then. This vote isn't though. -- Spang talk 11:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Sick etiquete

I found this through random page... been around since September 2005 and doesn't seem to be expanding, which may be a good thing. I don't find it funny, but maybe it's just too Brutish or maybe I just have no patience for someone who can't even spellcheck their title. --Imrealized 06:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Or move it to some sort of social etiquette HowTo:. -- Spang talk 06:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Aggi

  • Huff: Self-admitted vanity. --Splaka 05:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. But what a cute little penguin. -- Spang talk 06:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:SRV

This template was made by an anon ip who apparently feels that instead of nrv tagging things, we admins should fix up all 200 one-liner articles that get created per day, freeing up more time for him/her to start more articles s/he can't be bothered to finish. While the poster has a right to say this, I don't want yet another template floating out there with no real need. We already have {{noQVFD}} for pages that should be given full time for an author to come back and care. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 04:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Useless. That's what {{fix}}, {{rewrite}}, {{expand}} etc. are for. -- Spang talk 04:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This template could be useful. But, the user needs to ask permission before creating a template.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 05:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff Already too many templates that do the same thing.
Comment - looking at the history, that's splaka's vote. Put your name on it, man! -- Spang talk 06:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Make me! --Splaka 06:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
That's it. I'm telling. -- Spang talk 06:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Neutral I created this template and I'm fine with either keeping it or deleting it. I did not know that permission to create a template was required, otherwise I wouldn't have done it. But I think this conversation that the SRV template has brought about has raised a significant issue, which is this: is NRV just for short things? Or is it a content issue? Because, if "one liner"-ism is the problem, a tag that says "no redeeming value" doesn't seem to relate to the length, that is a content tag. If tagging a page with NRV just because it's short is the point, really some different template would be more useful than NRV.

And if NRV is used because the page is stupid in the opinion of the tagger, I'm not convinced of the value of a template whose purpose is to permit any user, without any vote for consensus, to tag a page as "stupid," which is what "no redeeming value" seems to imply. If everybody did this, I doubt any page here would be untagged, since at least one person in the world would probably find at least one of the pages here "stupid." IMHO, if page length is the issue, we need a "this article is too short" tag, not a "no redeeming value" tag. Or, if someone wants to tag something "no redeeming value," which is a content tag, they should have to get consensus first. User:RudolfRadna 15:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The history of everything

I seem to have co-created a monster, and a crappy monster it is. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

North_War

From the same man who brought you Duel Masters, I give you... a piece of crap! --Hobelhouse 22:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - While I will not be VFHing this, I see no reason to obliterate it either. This guy (?) has got a style all his own. --Imrealized 00:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think one is enough. -- Spang talk 06:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Alex Shrub

  • Delete - Dalek, this re-defines sad. An article about a minor video game character. Written straight. The horror, the horror. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • O_o ... (long awkward pause, during which can be heard the faint grinding of miniature gears, and the subtle hiss-pop of shorting circuitry) ... Wow. You're right. Up until now, I've never been ashamed to be a gamer. Maybe I need to pay a visit to Jack Thompson, and apologize for my earlier remarks. Or maybe we just need to FUC-KING-EX-TER-MI-FUC-KING-NATE!!! this worthless shit right away! Ant-Farm Jesus! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Spang 18:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 19:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Please Delete - uh, please..? --Imrealized 05:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Beetles

Predacon Party

Kanye Bush

Burning Bush

Stub

If you clean it, it's best to make it not be about people with missing limbs. --TimeStopper 02:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Russian reversal

Nominate and DESTROY THIS FUCKING ARTICLE It's old, irrelevant, and causes n00bs to join IRC and spout an endless stream of In Soviet Russia, this and In Soviet Russia, that it's horribly annoying, and i believe the Uncyclopedia Admins would enjoy deleting less Russian reversals from articles that already contain a substantial amount of crap. >_< ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 23:27, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Against Keep - Doesn't need to be deleted, those n00bs just need to be banned, whether it's IRC or Uncyclopedia. --Clorox Icons-flag-us MUN ONS (diskussion) 23:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

AAAAgainst Keep - What other quotes can noobs write? --TimeStopper 00:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep !! This is one of the few pages that I really like. Granted, I have to decruft regularly...there's some sort of appropriate garden analogy that escapes me at the moment. Anidnmeno is out of his (or her...it's?) mind. Just because it refers to a mediocre joke from a crap comic who rapidly outlived his undeserved fifteen minutes of fame in the 80's doesn't mean we should give up our white-framed shades and skinny ties, dagnabit! Pesky kids these days with their interweb and their baggy pants...next they'll be asking us to give up our NES's, gol dern'd it! Modusoperandi 00:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's funny, and what's most important is if an article is funny to people who have never seen it before, not whether it's funny to someone who's been a member here for months. Scythe33 00:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Because I'm feeling like a bastard this morning. Seriously, though, the joke isn't that good. In fact, it's terrible. Plus, it's spread around enough Uncyclopedia that killing this page would only add to its legend. In Soviet Russia, Article Voted for Deletion deletes YOU! — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep- being a n00b, I AM quite amused... maybe it should be seriously shortened to cut out the extra filler crap? but some parts of it were fairly clever methinks --Ishiki 15:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I think that it's far too late to just delete this "article" -- it's insinuated itself into too many other pages. I do, however think, we need to CUT CON-TENT!!! from it, as it's turned into a nightmare, like all those brain-dead Chuck Norris "facts." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, but cut down. In Soviet Russia, article deletes YOU!!. Because it had to be done. --Spang 19:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, Should definatively be kept, Soviet Reversal jokes were pretty popular, and some of those in that list were nice. It just needs to be way cleaned up. Dandin1 23:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Kibology

  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime containing mostly outside links, little content, and overusing the term "smart-ass" (6 occurences in a very short article)" --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 20:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - This is one of the troubling occurences at Uncyclopedia where not only does the article need to be killed, but the author(s) need to be dragged into the street and beaten with riot sticks. Damned smart-asses. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Holy jumped-up Jesus on a motorized candy cane. Shit like this really chaps my hovering metal ass. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. In Soviet Russia, article deletes YOU!!. Sorry, had to be done. --Spang 18:11, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Necromancers

I've Gone Caliente Loco

American Genocide

  • Delete. -Seems to only insult in a non-funny manner? --Ishiki 19:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. It's first line is a fact. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 02:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleet - Not Uncyclopedia material. --Trevie 15:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -Being American military makes me like what is said. However It's just not funny.--24.23.205.140 05:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - FoxNews is more entertaining than this slop (and less vitriolic which is hard to comprehend). --Imrealized 06:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Obidike Eze

  • Delete - He's a medical student in London from Nigeria. How do I know this? Because his life story can be found on Google. And so too can it be found here at Uncyclopedia. Alas, in either realm, it isn't funny in the least. If anyone votes to keep or rewrite this, I will know immediately that you are Obidike Eze or one of his friends. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 18:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Yarr, Kill tha' article. Though I do fancy da eatin' of bones... --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!02:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Hmm... smells like a clear-cut case of vanity to me. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete! --Spang 17:58, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Artem

Day-Wizzle

  • Huff ... Vanity? --Splaka 06:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff ... Shit. --Spang 07:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV ... Not Vanity, but crap.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 07:58, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 14:30, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Torpedo in surround sound (or at least stereo). --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail02:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Ugh 2: Electric Boogaloo.

Decepticon Party

  • Delete Article about something from a lame TV show that about 5 people from our galaxy actually understand. Scythe33 23:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and rewrite. I am saddened that I am one of the 5 remaining beings that believes this idea might have some value.--Winston 14:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - The idea does have value, just not this shit execution. I kept expecting a Chuck Norris reference, but was sadly let down. C'mon, Chucksters, represent! — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • weak keep and rewrite. It's not quite bad enough to huff. --neko 19:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of redunda-redunda-redundancy" --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 02:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • AAAAgainst deletion. If you delete this you will have to also delete the "Predacon Party." --TimeStopper 00:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Why should that stop anything? Scythe33 00:20, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The droids you're looking for

  • Delete. A rather poor Star Wars stub present since October of last year, with no signs of convalescing.--Winston 17:13, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 17:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is not the article you're looking for. --Spang 19:31, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire Photons Torpedos at this intergalactic threat! I wish but could say something else, but I really can't. --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail19:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. - This is really Jedi vandalism/crap.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 02:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm the Droid you're looking for. And I say EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Peach

  • Delete. I have nothing against vanity pages, providing they meet one singular criterion: Is It Funny. In this case... I'm forced to say... No. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 16:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 16:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Have it be moved to the userpage, if any, before it is mercilessly smashied. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete it, for the good of humanity. --Spang 19:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • transport it to User:Flameviper/Peach --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail19:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to userpage - Now excuse me, I'm going to retch. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • This nit keeps recreating these vanity pages (Haska, for example.) They keep getting huffed. TRANS-PORT it to his userpage, and hopefully he'll finally get the cunting message. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:34, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity pages about people are bad enough, vanity pages that people make about their pets are worse. Modusoperandi 10:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Raffles Institution Pot-bellied Bastards

Comment - That's a new one, Dalek. XD Oh, yeah, please maul this shitty article, too. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wow, I think this was actually written by someone in a prison. Too bad it's not funny. --Iritscen 16:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 16:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • SMASHY! User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it dead. What is it about this website that makes people think that just anyone create an article? Fools. --Spang 19:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Either GuillotineiconGuillotine this abominaton, or else QVFD it at once! --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 19:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Don Fraga

  • Found this one by looking at the history for Sherudo Garo. It's part of the ancient HUFFED Sercian empire. The author has refused to respond to numerous requests to alter/move to namespace these articles, which are based on an (unfunny) fictional universe. The author was banned months ago for similar offenses. (Logs can be checked... I dunno how! :))I say we EX-TER-MI-NATE all these pages once and for all! What say you? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • You know what I say? I say...MAUL. Rawr. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 16:02, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I say die die die!. Any pages even similar to this should also be summarily executed. --Spang 17:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow. That's quite the impressively ugly block of unfunny, easily DELETEable text. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 20:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Rataube 23:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Galicia

Raffles Institution

  • Huff. In joke? Crap? I think I got cancer just editing it to put in the vanity3 template. --Splaka 10:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless the author ever bothers to come back and look and fix it. Could be made permissible vanity, but no-one else will care - David Gerard 10:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Sorry, but I can't think that (any) vanity would ever be allowable -- that's just me, though. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill the article, then kill the author. Good god. --Spang 17:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Quotewhoring? Check. Abuse of the horizontal line? Check. Utter example of lameness? Check. Delete? Check. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 20:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Rataube 00:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill and skullfuck this is awful, real awful. The mutually linked Republic of Lee Kingdom deserves a skullfucking too.--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy. It's vanity. Nobody cares. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:55, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Done I redirected it to another article. slightly better taste, I hope. I apologise on behalf for my school's juniors so that we can teach them to write better lame articles.--202.156.6.75 07:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The flying whale

  • Delete. It's not funny, and worse, he dares mock Oscar's poetry! Just no. --Spang 06:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • D'leat That sorta sucks--Count of Monkey Crisco 16:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Sink--Rataube 21:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

*keep it Well sorry if it appears not that funny, I made it as an inside joke between some friends of mine. And the oscar wilde thing fit the website, it is dicribing the whale from the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy.

  • Let it be It's pretty damn funny. Definately better than a lot of the other stuff I've read on here. Silly rabbit, unsigned votes don't count. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or rewrite - Feels like there's only one joke. --Trevie 15:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy. Oscar Wilde > everything > the author of this article. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:56, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I know what the author is referring to, but still, this is sub-standard. Plus, I hate lowercase titles. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

*Leave it Hilarious We're still getting unsigned votes on this one!? Begone! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:American President Dies

Sonnet

  • Delete- Poetry crap.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 13:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Excellent material for Encyclopædia Dramatica! --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 21:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Poetry humour can be good fun, but we can't have an article if it's just one poem. --Spang 01:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Balls: the Sequel! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV.--Winston 15:28, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • weak keep It's not bad and would serve as a great opener for a longer sonnet aricle.--Count of Monkey Crisco 16:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. For Petrarca's sake!!--Rataube 21:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Amusing. --Trevie 15:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It's one of those articles that are written in the style of their name. This article on sonnets is written as a sonnet. However, there's only one sonnet so far, so either add more or may the hammer of smashy be upon you. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 16:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I'm torn. As far as I know, this is a real, live sonnet, and therefore justifies itself with its light, prancibald humor. However, an Uncyclopedia article should delve into the heart of the matter, and it's not really cutting it. But the positives (cute) outweigh the negatives (short), or maybe I'm just tired of reading articles about how stupid the security guards at your fucking elitist private school are. Boo-fucking-hoo. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Humour

  • Pointless - I thought everything on Uncyc was supposed to be humour/humor? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:47, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Surely it's a category for Humourous pages about humour, as opposed to humourous pages about other things? Or just a list for Americans of the articles they may not understand? --Spang 01:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I say it's an article for People who can't spell "Humor". Friggan Limeys across the ocean, eh wot? Just kidding... I am not sure if we need this or not... as User:guest pointed out, it's kinda the whole point of Uncyclopedia. I suppose... um Delete. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 18:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Well, Category:Humor has much fewer articles in, therefore Britain is funnier than America. We win! --Spang 18:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Dammit, Spang, I use humor and humour. But maybe I'm an exception, an American too well-versed in humor/humour from both sides of the pond, to take sides in the humor/humour war. Look- Britishe Humour, when done well, is funnier (in my taste) than American humor, but American humor is like our take on the Queen's English - broad and without apology, perhaps like Australianz - to be discounted. I daresay we have more latitude/longitude than the Brits...or I could be wronge. Either way, let's all agree English is the Mother Tongue and unite to use it to smite all other tongues from around the world! Let us all be funnie! — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 01:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)~

Phil Osophy

  • Delete. Random, not funny.--InfiniteMonkey 04:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. OK, I've got to point out I've contributed a bit to this article, but because of its potential. Agreed, some of the stuff in it, like the reference to 50 Cent, is a bit random, but with a bit of a rewrite, this could potentially be good. Hindleyite 17:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep or Rewrite: The article IS random but there is nothing wrong with that. It is keepable, but the topic deserves better. --Toloran 04:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite.--Winston 15:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail19:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Budapest

  • Delete. Kind of unfunny. Chirkee 02:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not as screamingly awful as much stuff, but doesn't justify existence, either. --InfiniteMonkey 04:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Spang 06:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV.--Winston 15:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Comrade Che 10:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire Photons Torpedos at this intergalactic threat! --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail19:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

List of Paradoxes

* Rewrite. The article is deletable and unfunny, but the concept has potential; and half the struggle is figuring out what needs to be an article in the first place. Unsigned, void. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! No more lists. Period. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge content to paradox, perhaps as a 'See also' section.--Winston 15:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Must... destroy. No content here even worth merging with anything else, lest its suckiness pull another article into the black hole of suckiness in which it resides... oh, just delete it. Even my comments are sucky now. Thanks, article. --Iritscen 16:28, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Collapse-Not funny in the slightest. Scythe33 23:06, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Cocks


REDIRECTED to Cock: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Sherudo Garo

I don't find the funny and it has repeatedly crossed my path in annoying ways. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

(Isra bans STM for removing this entry) 22:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • delete if there's humor here, I can't find it. --InfiniteMonkey 00:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 01:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing to laugh at here, move along people. --Spang 05:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Dear god, it's Sercia all over again! I thought gwax huffed all of this shite -- good job finding this one, Isra! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Christianity

  • Kill it hard Very poor and disjointed. A chance for good parody, but not without a complete rewrite (and being randomly offensive just isn't parody). --R-T-C Tim 15:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Save, not VFD material. --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 16:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Just tag it for a re-write or something, but don't delete it, it's okay. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 18:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • rewrite. Some stupid stuff, some kinda funny stuff, semi-coherent. Need a page on this subject. --InfiniteMonkey 00:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  • deleteNo fun to just offense without humor...
  • Keep and Rewrite: There were a few things that made me smile, but the article as a whole isn't very good. My main beef against it is that it starts out with so MANY quotes. --Toloran 04:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Needs to be cleaned up, but not particularly awful. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep.--Winston 15:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It really hurts to write this about Christianity!--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 12:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • PRE-SERVE!!! Although it could use an overhaul... --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Unknown Soldier

This was ugly tagged, but it doesn't seem funny enough to merit a cleanup. Anyone want to rewrite? Else I recommend we just delete its unworthy behind. --Legion 04:46, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

  • I did a rewrite. Not sure if it's funny, but it's better than the first incarnation... --DeathByPie 19:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! OMG, 1 DALEKed J00!!!1! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of evading QVFD, despite it's worthlessness" --CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS  07:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)recinded Simulacrum Caputosis 15:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and rewrite again. The core concept has legs.--Winston 15:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm feeling generous... I say we Let it Live, provided that SimulacrumCaputosis (Dude, that is a seriously long freaking name!) can inject some more savory goodness into it... Has potential, but needs work. Or, I'll note it on my user page for a future resuscitation. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 23:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Water Powered Bus

ARRRRGH, I'll get you, TD! I'll...get...youuuuuuuuuuuuBear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:17,
KHAAAAAAAAAN!!! KHAAAAAAAAAN!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

22 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep and rewrite - Well written, just needs to be a bit funnier. --Trevie 15:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewritten. What do you think? If it's crap feel free to scrap it, I encourage people to add more. Remove the NRV at least? I do like my picture though. It took hours to draw. --Spang 04:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Okay, I could have sworn I rewrote this, but it hasn't shown up, and isn't on the history. I guess I only previewed and forgot to save. I was tired. Definitely saved it to a .txt beforehand though, but on a computer I won't be able to get to for another week, and it's likely this'll have been deleted by the per the NRV. Ah well. At least now you know a rewritten version is coming soon. --Spang 04:14, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

DELETE - absolute horse dung - anonanonanonanon Unsigned. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 18:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

  • NRV (it already was).--Winston 15:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Tautology

Addendum: I'd get into boolean algebra, just cuz it sounds funny.--Imrealized 12:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It has some merit, otherwise I'd suggest a redirect to Redundancy.--Winston 15:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Extreme knitting

  • Electrocute it.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 09:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The concept of extreme knitting hilarious, but the article needs at least a rewrite. --Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 12:44, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Genius concept, crap execution. I'll make a not of the idea on my userpage, and perhaps resurrect it later, but for now, we'll just say goodbye, and wipe the slate clean. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or add a lot - A little too random and short. --Trevie 15:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire Photons Torpedos at this intergalactic threat! Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail22:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep it it does need a bit of work though. --Chainsawmidget 23:39, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I think I've seen this somewhere before, and I laughed then. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 18:40, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Duel Masters

  • Keep: I happen to like the Engrish in that article. I think it's funny in a very random way. --Bringa 03:45, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Whoever wrote this crap needs a swift kick in the ass. Total crap. Sir Tripod2282 Icons-flag-us cun vfp talk Active ~ 17:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I think it's beautiful. --Spang 18:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. VCR Manual knockoff, but with no purpose --Keithhackworth MUN 18:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - I hate to be the bearer of obvious news, but I did a little research. The primary author of this dual VHF/VFD article seems to be, how shall we say, not a native English speaker. So for everyone offering accolades for his hilarious send-up of poor Japanese translations, and everyone knocking him for being an idiot, you're both wrong. Unless he really is an idiot, or so brilliant he can mock a poor translation of a non-native language, he's just some European playing in an Uncyclopediac domain. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 19:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I have no idea why this off english article is funny. --Chronarion 19:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete?! You've gotta be kidding me! This is friggan classic! I put it up for VFH and it recieved numerous positive responses. Keep this motha. It's sooo bad, it's spectacular! I sure as hell couldn't write anything this incoherently hilarious. The Engrish is top-notch, moron or not, native speaker or not. I was fairly certain he had no clue how to write, but it matters not. This article is like Forest Gump. Both an abomination against Christ, and an award-winning piece. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • PRE-SERVE-AND-QUA-RAN-TINE!!! I think it's funny for the same reason that Engrish.com is hilarious -- it really wasn't supposed to be. The subject material is vile enough on its own, and the crappy pictures and crappier text, complete with the riotous Engrish phraseology, makes it one of the funniest things I've read on this site in weeks. Still, I'd like to toss this one in a cage and spend all day lobbing peanuts at it, so I think we need a special "Razzies" or "Golden Turkey"-equivalent category for this. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment - the VFH nomination has tanked - it's for the best really. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 20:43, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I haven't seen a worse mauling of the english language since Bush went into office Keep. --Toloran 06:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article makes the site look bad. ~Sir Rangeley Icons-flag-us GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 02:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Where is the parody? Where is the satire? Nowhere. Just because the absolute horrendousness of it is kind of funny does not make it Uncyclopedia material. Do we want to strive for a level of quality here or do we want to become a crap haven like ED? I say quality but you can vote how you want. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:36, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep This is classic Engrish, and is frickin hilarious. Please don't huff it. Bonzodog 15:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment: Engrish belongs in Engrish and possible Japan but nowhere else on Uncyclopedia. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 06:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 15:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep--Rataube 00:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - As per the strongly worded vote of Sir Rangeley. This makes us look like we're in league with Encyclopedia Dramatica, and thusly cannot be allowed to pass. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Pope John Paul 2.0

Delete - After being brought to my attention, I suggest this needs to be sacked, pillaged, and created anew. If people vote to keep this lacklustre affaire, I swear on Il Papa himself I will make this a sacrilicious rewrite. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Delete. I totally agree. Pretty lame article. --Legolasegb 16:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment - That's another issue - as it stands, this monumental historical figure, with oodles of humor potential, has a shitty 200-word article to his name. Pope John Paul II redirects to Pope John Paul 2.0. I suggest that a new Pope John Paul II article be started, and it can link to Pope John Paul 2.0...if we don't to delete it, that is. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Replying comment: Oh hah! I never noticed it linked to JP 2.0... Silly me... Well, in that case, I'ma chagin' my vote...--⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 14:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • The current article isn't good enough, but with a rewrite, it could be. Hell, the title made me laugh, there's good humour to be had here. --Spang 17:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Currently not great, but does not necessitate a purge. --Chronarion 19:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire Photons Torpedos at this intergalactic threat! The title is catchy, the article is cling-on that should be wiped off the cheek of the universe. --Captain Caputosis····Communicatorbadgehail21:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment and Keep - I started a re-write that I'll finish the draft of tomorrow soon. Before you vote to kill it see what I've got so far...it's coming along. It's also five times as long as the original, and at least twice as funny. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 20:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Voting Closed - Pending approval/disapproval from Major Gwax, I have removed the VFD tag from Pope John Paul 2.0. Voting was Keep or Re-write - 5, Delete - 2, Revert (?) - 1. Since I put the freaking article up for deletion, and have since completely written it out of the VFD ballpark, I want the voting halted so that n00bs (yes, I realize this is the first time I have ever used "n00b" in writing in a non-ironic sense) do not come in and vote on the re-write, which is not the damned issue here. ARRRRRRRRGH — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

ACS/SovietSquirrel, Acs

Allowed vanity (or I'd have NRVed them), but they're also drooling, incoherent, badly spelled and suck royally. Salt the earth. - David Gerard 19:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

  • I dunno. This is so dumb, and poorly written, I almost enjoy it for it's horrendous quality. Lord knows that if something is just bad enough, it can become an uncyclopediatric hit... I have to Abstain from voting for now. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 20:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete ACS, Keep Soviet Squirrel. TD was right - Soviet Squirrel kind of lured me in with its earnest stupidity. ACS has got to go, though. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Wow, I didn't notice there were two pages here... All 3 people named in the Acs page should be shot. Their user pages are frighteningly incoherent, and serve only to validate my inherent mistrust of strangers. Acs should be deleted. User:TD 19:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 05:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill ACS, but Keep & Save Soviet Squirrel! Soviet Squirrel is too powerful to be deleted! --Comrade Che 15:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE Acs -- the Squirrel is a prime candidate for placement in the "Worst Of" category (I'm lobbying for it on the Village Dump forums.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, em because so ner!--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 17:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • "To the GuillotineiconGuillotine should the lot of them be marched."

CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 20:46, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Pro-Test

  • Deleteness!: Is this even funny? Am I living in Bizarro world? Or is this just too british-centric for an American like me? The article appears to have a point, but the humor is either too subtle for me, which is awfully gosh-darn impressive, or it sucks ass, which is awfully fuckin plausible. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 22:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • FixI agree that its pretty strange and/or confusing, but it looks like there might be (might be, not is!) something there kindof funny. --Mrfrence 22:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • rewrite needs work, has potential to be funny --ThEBaGmAn 23:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - I'm not seeing the potential (it would take a serious overhaul)...but maybe my vote should be halved since I'm new and an occasional idiot. --Imrealized 07:07, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep - Irony at its finest! UNSIGNED & VOID. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 20:44, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep I agree it could do with some work, but in the context of the Pro-Test news story, which was pretty major in the UK, I reckon it's worthy of inclusion, and funny enough to be improved rather than deleted. KrJDub05 14:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Deprogramming

  • Delete - Ehhh, no. Much more could be done with this topic. --Some user 07:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I can see humor here, it's obtuse and strange, but I think a person in the know could expand the living daylights out of it, and give us something really good.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is a good stub. --Chronarion 23:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - If this stubby were expanded with quality content, this would feel out of place and end up excusing itself anyway. Let's show it the door early. --Imrealized 07:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 20:08, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - No. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. Possibly funny. --Johnfn 13:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! I can't see how it's "good" at all. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:42, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Guillotineicon"to the Guillotine!" shouts His Royal Majesty, "for the crime of shortness"

CrownSimulacrumCaputosisTheGreat*moan* F@H MUN CM NS 20:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. Although not the funniest article, those with an appreciation of the issues (in real life there is one hell of a heated debate about the Oxford lab) and a decent satirical SoH will understand this and also find it genuinely entertaining. -- another guy, 25/03/06, 03:16 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects