## Pwndarian Empire

• Delete - Its an article I'm not particularily proud of making. Its a pile of total crap. --Jocke Pirat 23:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Huff (as per NRV tag). -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• uff-hay follow dat nrv stamp, cap'n--ThEBaGmAn 03:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)!

## Euronintendo

• Delete... guys... --Chronarion 23:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• elete-day waaaaaaay too short, no content.--ThEBaGmAn 23:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Swift Kill. -- 23:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete--Nytrospawn 00:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Feature!Smashy! --H. 00:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Hinoa beat me to it. Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:32, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## Ultimate-awesome-times-infinity-plus-one

• Delete: It's a never ending stream of hatred here at Uncyclopedia... and articles like this are why. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 22:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• delete... --Mrfrence 22:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• elete-day sucks ass. 'nuff said--ThEBaGmAn 23:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Jesus! Chuck Norris! Pirate Ninja Jesus! Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:21, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## TheNAN

• Holy Gobshite Batman! This one is a real winner. Jesus everliving fuck, Delete this worthless pile of feces, before it hurts someone. I used to think I was a decent writer, but uncyclopedia has convinced me that I'm not decent, I'm fucking awesome! (well, at least in comparison to the plebian simpletons who think up some of this shit.) TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 17:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - Calm down, TD. It's going to be all right...maybe. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 18:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Sorry, I haven't written an article with my trademark liberal profanity lately, so I was needing a fix... maybe I should take up smoking... or perhaps Kittens TD
• I proudly support deicide in a case such as this. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 18:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• FUC-KING-EX-TER-MI-FUC-KING-NATE this "article," and maybe the author too for unleashing this putrescence. I'm with ya, TD. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Make it go bye-bye--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• ummm... okay. Delete.--Mrfrence 22:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Cow_Bells

REDIRECTED to Cowbell: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 04:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## The "Life, the Universe, and Everything" Scandal of 42

• Delete - Looks like the author didn't even bother to parody "Hitchhiker's Guide" - just wrote a bad synopsis. --Some user 07:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• For what it's worth, the author didn't finish it. It was an abandoned WIP that was long enough to keep. Not that I've read it or anything... --KATIE!! 07:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Eh, Delete it. I'm a huge Douglass Adams fan, and though the article is well-written, it needs ... erm... well it needs something, you know? Mayhaps the author should have tossed back a few shots of the 'ol Janx spirits, to give it that really authentic feel, yes? TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• elete-day as a great mind once said, "I wish it were an oscar mayer wiener, that way I could bite off it's dumb head" --ThEBaGmAn 14:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• So long and thanks for nothing. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 17:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## F. Scott Fitzgerald

• Someone slapped a vfd on it, but there was no entry. Anyway, I think it has definite potential, but it's too small - Keep and expand --Poofers 03:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• NRV.--Jtaylor1 04:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed, NRV --Some user 07:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Maybe I'm an asshat, but as a fan of Fitzgerald, I find it amusing. Agree with Poofers on this TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 14:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• ewright-ray it has potential, hat's for sure... but it needs some serious love. --ThEBaGmAn 14:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Not cutting it. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 16:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Slap

• Delete/rewrite not that funny, it needs love though. it should only need to be deleted if it isn't re-written or made funnier.--Bilbobaggins 01:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

(oops, forgot to sign...)--Bilbobaggins 01:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

• Rewrite? There is some interesting potential, but its kind of going in two way different directions and needs to be cleaned up and brought up to par.--Mrfrence 01:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Total rewrite. The topic is good - the rest of the article, not so much. --Poofers 03:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite. It's kind of funny but split between Slap and Cashew Nuts. Needs continuity. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 03:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Cheesecakeism

• Delete: Prime example of a joke that just isn't working. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)21:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• elete-day it made my mother cry!!!--Bilbobaggins 23:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 03:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• There's so many random, impossible events and spelling errors! It's exactly the hilarious, rip-snorting good time we need...oh wait. Terminate with extreme prejudice --Poofers 03:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I used to like cheesecake, too. S'moozer (yeah, that's me alrighty) 07:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Bleef

• Make it an unarticle. Please. --Spang 20:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• This could end up being funny... it should be given a chance.- User:68.79.21.37
• Delete. I can't believe that anyone wrote this. It is a level of incoherency I have never before witnessed. This shit makes so little sense, I can't believe that registered users have even participated in it's editing. The last remaining shred of hope for humanity I was desparately holding on to, has been destroyed now. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete-ness. Basically seconding what ^above^ said; it makes little sense and really wastes space. As a side note though, the line about the pants sizes made me laugh. I'm not sure thats worth saving an article on... on... bleef. --Mrfrence 22:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• elete-day I think it's too silly (stupid) maybe a rewrite could help it.--Bilbobaggins 23:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy. --H. 23:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Break its kneecaps. Not that it could walk in the first place. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 03:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Stupid, and not just funny (huh?) - burninate immediately --Poofers 03:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - The moment I read the words "Dr. Phil" my eyes fell out and my shoes fell off. It took me five minutes to recover! — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it'll take more than a book of mad-libs to get on uncyclopedia--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Teenager

• DELETE!!!!! This page is found extremely offensive and overly stereotypical, even for uncyclopedia. --User:24.229.86.26 19:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Fuck that, this needs to be a Front Page article! Keep. This is great, but then, I'm an evil, cynical bastard who hated teenagers, even when I was one. Biting political commentary, generalized hatred for society, I Love it.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep: This article is golden and absolutely deserves to be on the front page. For that matter, I have nominated it for featuring and you all should go vote for it there. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep. Redoing my vote. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~
• Okay, who baleeted my vote? Anyway, I guess I do get to do my rcmurphy impression, after all. (ahem) "Feature!" --— 19:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Listen 24.229.86.26, you may be respected around here, but this article really isn't that bad. It's actually kinda "funny." You're only contributing to it's rising fame with your smear campaign against it.-- 20:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Spang 20:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and ban those who voted for deletion. (just kidding about the ban.) ((or am I?)) -- 21:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a good article, VFD is for piss poor one liners not long, considered, funny articles, you can't just vfd an article because you want to re-write it. -- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:55, 13 March 2006 (GMT)
• Actually, QVFD is for piss poor one liners and you can VFD articles for whatever reason you want, even if you just don't like them; though abusing the system will get you banned. --Sir gwax (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. And I strongly encourage the voting of it to be featured... --No one that even closely resembles 21:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keeper How did this article get here? It rocks, and is very funny and entertaining. SAVENESS! Unsigned --Sir gwax (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• eep-kay it's nice, and I should know, I AM a teenager...--Bilbobaggins 22:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• In my day Dana Carvey used to be on Saturday Night Live and he had this old man character that would gripe about teenagers and stuff almost exactly like this, but it was actually a parody of old grouchy people, and we liked it!--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep We can't VFH and VFD at once...-- Swami A. Suresh 20:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep! --Boy Toy bitch at me 21:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• PRE-SERVE!!! (but EX-TER-MI-NATE the water-bag that nominated it for deletion.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 21:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 03:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## Teenager (disambiguation)

• Delete: Unnecessary and stupid (assuming the following two entries go right). --Sir gwax (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Shit. Utter Shit. I mean... wow man. Shitty TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• I swear I already said smashy here... --H. 20:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• elete-day UNLESS the other votes do not pass if they pass, it=useless.if they fail it=not as useless--Bilbobaggins 23:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Although it's better than alot of other diambiguations. I swear, most of the Disambig pages on Uncyc do not deserve to live. 21:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Teenagers (Animal)

• KEEP. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~
• Keep This is some good shiznitt. I love the stereotype here as well. Making fun of Goths, which I almost used to be, making fun of D&D nerds, which I still am today. But, as I said, I am cynical and evil.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Teenager. --— 19:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• I'm not sure about that... the emphasis of the Animal article goes in a completely different direction. The two themes don't connect, so trying to somehow cram the one inside of the other would result in a mediocre article at best. A merge would disrupt the flow of both articles, and, and two good articles is always better than 1 half-assed effort on trying to cobble them into a single entity. Just because two articles tackle the same topic doesn't mean that it's always necessary to merge them. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)20:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Ah, yeah. No merge. The artilces have very different styles, and the themes point in two different directions. It would be nearly impossible to merge them, and besides, I think both of them stand on their own just fine. 23:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's not bad. 21:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• EEP-KAY it's fun. made me chucle--Bilbobaggins 22:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 03:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## Teenage boy

• Delete or redirect to Teenager: This is crap and should be deleted or redirected to something worthwhile. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Utter shit. Utter shit. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Teenager. --— 19:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Useless crap. --Spang 20:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• BURN! (Delete) My eyes!!! A bunch of useless uselessness. Get rid of it, seriously.--Mrfrence 22:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with teenager maybe under new heading.--Bilbobaggins 22:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## GCMG

• Deletify. Is this funny? I don't get the joke, I have it NRV'd for the moment, but thought I'd post it here as there seems to be some measure of support TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)18:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Q-V-F-D, HU-MAN! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

## User contributions:Bilbobaggins

* Delete - anything he writes is crap. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 17:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

We don't attend to personal wars on VFD, if you want to nominate articles he has made, do so. If you want to complain about edits he's making find an admin and complain about specific problems on their talk page. Please do not waste my time on VFD with your petty antics. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment - I think this was in reference to the line immediately below. Still, I agree. VFD is not the place for "clever" gags. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
If it was supposed to be clever, I missed it. --Sir gwax (talk) 03:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I'll get meh coat - apologies to all concerned, although I did think with Wikipedia main page, and Uncyclopedia deletion policy both appearing here in a copule of days that "clever" gags go on from time to time.Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 10:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Oooh... good point. Still, no (and "no" to all similar postings.) Now come on back inside and have a pint. It's raining out. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Oh, and just for the record, this policy page is not official and if anyone ever tries to quote it as having any bearing on anything, I will point, laugh and then explain that nobody cares. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

## Wikipedia Main Page

• VFD Page is WAY too cluttered and appears to contain useful information. We really need to put a stop to this shit.--Electrostatic 05:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Agreed, huff away. --Splaka 06:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Is this even supposed to be funny? If so, I don't get it. --Sir gwax (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain: Sadly, this "Wicketpedia" appears to be beyond the jurisdiction of the Uncyclopedia Deletion Court and is therefore not a candidate for instahuffination. However, if legal issues are clarified and we're given permission for extradition of the political refugee "Main Page", then I vote to execute it. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 06:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this. I dare you, I double dare you!--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain - I could in fact delete it, but then everyone there would have to kill me - David Gerard 10:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Email me your password and I will do it for you. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 13:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - I fail to see what's funny about Teddy Roosevelt. Sure, he apparently had a high, girly voice, and nothing says "complete fruitcake" like tiny glasses and a bushy moustache, but obviously the author(s) of this "main page" did a lot of "research" and "citing sources," which is just not funny. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 11:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE! It hurts my optic array. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Aren't sporked articles supposed to be funny? -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Walter Payton College Prep

• Delete This is absolutely abysmal slandanity of the lowest quality and has no place on uncyclopedia. I believe it's basically QVFD-worthy and was deleted before I last deleted it. I believe it's better suited for LJ or ED, personally. What do you think? » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Bulldoze. --Sir Velair Wight 04:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Gag me with a stick. SMASHY!!!!! --H. 04:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• comeon... this should be saved... is is something that can bring people from this highschool to uncyclopedia... also it is a vanity page as tagged. What is wrong with this school having this one page?- User:68.79.21.37
Well, when one section comprises of "this teacher is hot," I think it's beyond saving. Just my opinion, though. --— 04:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Hinoa, you would understand why this is funny if you went to the school. Also, it can be seen as a form of anti-humor. - User:68.79.21.37
And there's the problem right there. If it's not funny to the outside world, then it gets deleted. --— 05:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
but it's a vanity page... haven't u read the rules for a vanity page?- User:68.79.21.37
Sure. However it's really unfunny. Vanity is allowed if it's funny only. I also altered some rules. --Chronarion 05:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• I think its funny
• Slandanity isn't a real word... stop trying to use big words to sound smart. Although this page seems silly, it is not one that is necessarily going to be funny to the public (although it has its moments E.G. the Digivolution thing which was brilliant). Seems like it would be nice for the kids attending this school to have it. Irrelevant, unsigned

*Rewrite The only reason I'm not calling for its destruction is because Katie seems to have given it a reprieve a few hours ago as long as it is within the Vanity policies. That being said, the "Students That Fall Into Random High School Stereotypes" section is basically libel (slander is spoken defamity, libel is written/legible... now you have a new way to remember :) ), and further the teacher section needs to be cleaned up, and our young friends need to learn how to tag... so REWRITE so that they can learn the trade and deal with that stuff. Jlove1982 05:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC) On second thought, I'm not feeling it, period. It's not funny, though at least they took the stuff out... Delete Jlove1982 22:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Slandanity is an uncyclopedia word. If you knew anything about this site, you'd know that. It's "Slander" + "Vanity", and it's expressly prohibited. Read the Vanity Policies - this doesn't fit them. Go to LJ, MySpace, or ED with it. We don't go to your school and don't care about how much you hate your teachers or want to make fun of your classmates. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 05:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Please use this page only to vote. This is not the place to talk about this article at length. We don't care if you think it's funny. Give a vote, and a short comment, or else we WILL resort to more drastic measures--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 05:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

- I just cleaned it up... I believe it is now a suitable vanity page. User:68.79.21.37 - Whaaaaaa?

• Keep with rewrite only Remove slander, make more generally funny, do not cite specific people. --Chronarion 05:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Remove the stuff about students Most of this was slanderous for no reason, none of it was funny, and some of it was true. If you're gonna insult someone, do it to their face, or you're a coward. Even the non-slanderous ones were not funny, as many of them were just summaries of the people. This is too easily warped for demagoguery, and that lowers the quality of uncyclopedia as a whole. Anything that isn't funny should be deleted. We should all take a lesson from Mr. Wilde on comedy.

"Hey, your mother told me how much she likes you last night! She said you're her favorite mistake!" -Oscar Wilde

• Maul - I totally agree with the above writer. If you want to insult someone, you should do it to their face, or you're a coward. And incontinent. And you have poor hygeine and a woefully underdeveloped theory of life. It's better to insult people to their face, especially if they're larger than you and could possibly do you grevious harm, either physically or via legal means. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 11:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this VFD it's waaaay to big. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 13:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE, before this gets any more out of plunger! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep first of all, slander is spoken, libel is written making this article guilty of Libanity, also keep in mind this article is in its infancy, and with work by more comical writers could be on its way to being something worthy of keeping.Irrelevant, unsigned Breaking numerous rules.
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• MAD DELETEZ --Mrfrence 02:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails QA.--Jtaylor1 04:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I can see the point in allowing vanity pages, but if Walter Payton were alive today, he'd probably do something really horrible and scandalous just to ensure that his name never got associated with anything like this article. --Some user 07:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Alan Alda

• Rewrite or Delete Found this while tagging stuff... piece of crap that deserves better. I mean, Alan Alda appears on Alliteration! Jlove1982 03:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashify. --H. 03:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I smiled at the West Wing bit. Needs less randomness, but there's enough good here to keep around. I put a rewrite tag on it because I love the juxtaposition of Mr. T and Alan Alda - David Gerard 10:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This article, if printed out, would be a disgrace to paper TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Kung Fu

• Delete: Chock full of random stupid, let's nuke it so that someone else can come along and put something worthwhile in its place. --Sir gwax (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• What he said. Smashy. --H. 03:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• 'Oppose -uh I like the article.--Jondel 09:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - Where were all the Chuck Norris jokes? That would have made this classic even better. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The animation at the bottom alone warrants not killing it. Re-write... perhaps, but I've seen smellier piles of beetle-dung masquerading as uncyclopedia articles.
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

## Cheese Jesus

• Delete: Correct me if I'm wrong, but we already have plenty of Jesii and this one isn't even funny. --Sir gwax (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy. It smells worse than ten-month-old foot cheese. --H. 03:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - You're not wrong about having too many Jesii, but this article actually has jokes, unlike a good deal of other VFD entrants. Now, are the jokes all that funny? Not riotous, no, but I think Cheesus is worth keeping around. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Doesn't meet any of the 6 criteria at Uncyclopedia:Deletion Policy. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 12:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Holy crap, I didn't know that we had a deletion policy. --Sir gwax (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Sometimes it takes a n00b to point out all of the mistakes you are making. Which reminds me, there seems be be an excessive amount of chatter on this page. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 16:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's no knee-slapper, but it's not raping my eyes either... Grammar and punctuation make me angry and want to kill it, but that can be corrected. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)18:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 03:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## Nintendo

• Delete: This topic deserves far better treatment. --Sir gwax (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite: though my vote would change if no one took it on. That's crap. Jlove1982 03:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• LIST GO SMASHY!!! --H. 03:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite the foo'! How shameful, the Encyclopædia Dramatica article on Nintendo is better than this.--Ryoske 06:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• See ya:Call Mario & Luigi, these pipes are stopped up. --Imrealized 07:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Jump on it's head me no likey. more a huge list than anything. maybe could use a magic mushroom--Bilbobaggins 16:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

## Sharp things

• Delete childish rant, not funny. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 01:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! Everyone knows that sharp things are good for you. Seriously. --H. 03:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE! Suction-based manipulators and disintegrators win against pitiful hu-man sharp things. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Ehhhh, delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

## FTP

Comment - I feel like I've created a monster here...I put FTP here because it's not funny. While I think we all agree (for the most part) it would be a shame to nuke this article and would do with some rewriting, nobody has stepped up to do that. Therefore, I slapped a NRV on it. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 18:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

## Limewire

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 03:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## Bananana

• Concept of imaginary fruit has potential, but execution lacking . Delete or complete rewrite. Unsigned vote removed. --Sir gwax (talk) 21:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Ditto the above. --Iritscen 16:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Peel it. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 22:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep? I rewrote the article the other day, does it have hope? --Matusao 01:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• It has hope. Keep. --— 07:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Making fruit funny is no small task. This has potential. — 2nd Lt. Sir Edward, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP 15:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, eat or redirect: It's the wrong spelling of banana and as such should be eaten or nuked outright. --Sir gwax (talk) 20:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Looks good enough to keep --Keithhackworth MUN 16:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Extreme Rewrite. Same reasons as above votes. Trash. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 17:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE! (I was expecting an Uncle Grandfather reference. That would be funny. This isn't.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep/Rewrite. This has potential. --Hobelhouse 18:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• ELETE-DAY!!!!!!!!! me no-likey. read it, didn't crack a smile.--Bilbobaggins 16:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 03:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## Krismas

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 03:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

## Marcus Allaman

I don't like it and it might be vanity. --Splaka 07:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• I think it's a Keeper...Don't get me wrong, it is bad, but its way better than Family Feud and to be honest, the line "Presents are always and even number" was like a koan for me and I stared at it for three hours. I'm thinkin' I'll nominate it for something at some point. --Imrealized 09:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unfortunately, it fails in one critical measure, it's not really funny. Okay, it's a little bit funny, but it's not Highly Funny. If the author is willing to revamp it and make it funnier, than it could be an acceptable vanity page. TD 16:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! NNP vanity, does not deserve a chance. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## Asshat

I don't like it and it might be vanity. -- 00:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## The Master

Was tagged, but not listed here (n00b!). Opinions? ~ T. (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

## Newb

• I don't get this one; is the irony here intentional? Meh, delete I say. Perhaps also a redirect to N00b if this can't be made different enough. --Spang 15:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Initially I was thinking delete, but then it came to me, there's some nuggets of humor there, the thing with the FPS, needing only a coder, GFX artist, Modeller, Web Designer. The best is at the bottom, with the "becoming the crazy guy whom everyone wants to go away". I'd say Rewrite and Expand. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)17:56, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• IN-COR-PO-RATE!!! with n00b. But kill the quote. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:45, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to N00B.--Jtaylor1 03:02, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul and redirect - I liked this article so much, it wins the coveted WWGAE! — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to n00b: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## Kurt Vonnegut

• Listen: Delete This. Vonnegut deserves far better. --Imrealized 14:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• PRE-SERVE. There's humor here. If you take exception, feel free to make improvements. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• I don't take issue with the use of some Vonnegut-like devices (there are a few), just that the overall feel of it, maybe the tone is, I don't know, off. He's one of the greatest writers of our time, other than Bill O'Reilly and Jackie Collins of course. My initial reaction was that if Vonnegut himself stumbled upon Uncyclopedia (hey, it could happen) he'd be dissappointed with this content and that perhaps we should bomb the piss out of it and start from scratch, but hey, I am an American and that's my solution for everything. I could be wrong, which is why I brought it here...let others decide. --Imrealized 20:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• I can understand where you're coming from. Hell, there are plenty of articles that I feel don't do adequate justice to their subject materials. But VFD is rather drastic, and is typically only used when the "article" has little to no apparent value, or is just blantantly offensive to a wide audience. In this case, it might serve your interests better to just make some additions and edits in Vonnegutese, and see where it takes you. Deletion isn't always the answer -- there's also rewriting. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)</small>
• KEEP or rewrite it yourself, dammit. We can't start to delete every semi-good article, just because the entry "deserves something better"--- Swami A. Suresh 22:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, although my vote may not count since I wrote it. I wonder if the rules say something about that. I should read them at some point.— 23:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## Family Feud

• Telete Dhis - Ah, if only comedy could be so easy as to post a few pics of really hot women and talk luridly about sex, but it ain't. I almost, almost gave you a NRV tag to give you the benefit of some time...until I got to the bottom. You'd have to bring way more funny to joke about Ray Combs and Michael J. Fox. Way more. --Imrealized 14:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, looks like it took a while, but I don't care. --Spang 14:33, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite - The idea has potential, just not brilliantly done. Add a bit more intelligent humour, and you have a decent article there. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 14:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite - I second ^that^ comment. Has potential, and make it less vile. At the least, 86 the reference to "Tom's Teenie-Peenie". I just don't personally know how I'd want to re-write the thing.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)17:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
If I tackled this subject, I'd go in a complete other direction and make it about a particular familiy feud between two (or more) actual families...you know, like the whole quote invention thing; think back through history, American, World, whatever, and pick out two families that would be fitting, and more importantly funny to have a feud. Of course Jefferson/Adams would be obvious. Umm, speaking of obvious, I just thought of something, but approached from the right angle it could work- something with the Manson Family and some other family. I'm just throwin' stuff out there. This obviously took time but I'm just not gettin' it. --Imrealized 20:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite, and if someone doesn't add Richard Dawson, I will cry. --— 20:18, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## Pokemon

• Nuke and replace with a redirect to Pokémon. --Sir gwax (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Nuke and replace with a redirect to Pokémon.-- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and replace with a redirect to Children's Brain Diseases, The Annotated Edition --Imrealized 06:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Kill the foo'! Charles Darwin would have wanted it that way.--Ryoske 07:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Kill: Although I haven't read it, and never intend to, the fact that it's Pokemon is justification enough. TD13:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• merge if possible, with Pokémon. And curse the French for their é. -- Swami A. Suresh 13:35, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I choose YOU!! --Spang 14:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Pokémon and Demolish the rubbish stuff. But keep the picture of Pikachu. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:41, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Gotta smash 'em all. (Now excuse me, I feel dirty for saying that, and not in the good way.) --H. 20:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to Pokémon: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## AWOL

• Delete: Not funny. Well written, but not funny. Also, the author should be run over by a dump truck. --TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - as a part-time communist hippie I take great offense regarding this entry's portrayal of me. Also it sucks. --Imrealized 06:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Funny, I found it offensive as a US Army Soldier. That takes a lot of talent, managing to piss off both hippies, and soldiers who prefer to kill said hippies at the same time. TD
• Delete. No humour makes bad article. Something better could be done with that title i think. --Spang 14:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Demolish. Latin and 1337 references don't mix. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• SMASHY!!! --H. 20:14, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## Wink

• It looks like it might be vanity, and it isn't very amusing. -- 05:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I'll second that. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 13:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Kill. Worthless, and a waste of potentially useful article name. --Andrusi 13:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• A delete is as good as a nod to a blind bat. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 14:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Deletion seems a kind and loving gesture, to everyone who didn't write this article. --TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 21:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Oh my god, Wink, Wink Eliot...I remember you from Christ Church Grammar School. You weren't funny back then either. Delete --Imrealized 06:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• My true passion lied in killing this article. --Spang 14:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Demolish. Vanity page and no emoticon references ;). - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - I hate this Wink almost as much as those Nintendo games he's in. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 17:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! Now where's Sim to complete the VFD catchphrase list... --H. 20:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

## Snownut

NRVed: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
In the future please NRV pages like this in the first place so as not to waste space here.

## Borogoves

NRVed: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
In the future please NRV pages like this in the first place so as not to waste space here.

## Marc Dutroux

NRVed: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
In the future please NRV pages like this in the first place so as not to waste space here.

## Half-hedgehoglessness

NRVed: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
In the future please NRV pages like this in the first place so as not to waste space here.

## Boolean Logic

NRVed: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
In the future please NRV pages like this in the first place so as not to waste space here.

## Joe Rogan

• ELETE-DAY I don't find it funny, and it's like omething I'd write (anything I write=crap)--Bilbobaggins 16:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Admitting you have a problem is the first step to recovery. Smashy. --H. 17:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• I dunno, it has this certain quality to it... weak keep. The thing about kicking people in the leg... I find it amusing. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete! Not only is it not funny (or comprehensible), no one cares about Joe Rogan. --Poofers 04:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. --Andrusi 13:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - To mention the Iron Chef in an entry as craptastic as this is worse than standing on your cutting board (fuckin' Bobby Flay)...hey, I wonder if Uncyclopedia has an entry on Bobby Flay. We do? It what? --Imrealized 07:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

## The Punisher

• Weak delete. Aside from some really weak political humor and some obtuse pirate references this is a factual article about The Punisher. A rewrite would do it right, though if deleted we won't really be losing much.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - This reads like a manual for how not to write an article. Forgotten in the process: jokes. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy! --H. 17:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Lots of effort. No humor. Leave all that "truth" crap to the wikipedians.TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 00:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It is hard to write an article on The Punisher without getting into the facts. There are other factual articles that are kept. I got some compliments on this article before, and I was told I was going in the right direction. But what do I know, there is a conspiracy against me anyway? --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
The Secret Society of People Who Can Recognize Articles That Suck is out to get you. WoooOOoooOoooOOOOoooo scary!!!--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:52, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
No those left-wingers who like my God-Fearing Republicans articles, but hate the right-wingy ones like The Punisher et all. A serious bias on Uncyclopedia. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Sorry O.B., the majority of your stuff is actually pretty good, even if it is a bit right-wingey... but this is just fanboy stuff, isn't it? --Some user 05:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Fanboy stuff in a way that it follows The Punisher and tries to make it funny. The NRA connection to God-Fearing-Republicans was supposed to be funny, esp if The Punisher originally was a hippie and then discovered that he liked war and killing. Then the pirate agnle tried to explain the skull on his chest. If it is a bit right-wingy, it is because most Unc articles are a bit left-wingy and these articles I write try to even things out. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Demolish. Boring. That says it all in my opinion. - Ghelaetalkcontribs 16:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

• Punished with Deletion - Because too much effort has been expended in explaination. If it were funny, that'd be unnecessary. --Imrealized 17:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
It has to be explained to people who have a pollitical bias towards the article. Otherwise it is funny. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:05, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment - Delete this fast, Orion's whining victimization is getting pathetic.

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 21:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

## Maple Story

• Delete. Immature people ruined it... It was nice and clean until more people started coming. --67.168.39.235 00:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wow... some guy tried to improve it, but it just can't be fixed. 20:07, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, for the love of god and all that is holy!! --⇔ 20:09, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• I'm laughing hard enough that asphyxiation is becoming a genuine concern! Holy god this is some terrible writing... Can I just go ahead and move this to my userpage, so I have it filed away for my "All time Shittiest" idea? TD -- 20:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A page like this belongs on Encyclop*dia Dramatica, not here. UNKNOWNFILE on 20:29, 18 March 2006 (EST)

Moved to User:TD/Maple Story, as requested by TD. --⇔ 01:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

## Paris by Night

• Delete. Nearly qfvd'd it, but decided to show some mercy. TD 19:39, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Never Regret Voting. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it. --Spang 17:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

## Rolandas Paksas

• Delete. Just because a person is capable of writing an Uncyclopedia article doesn't mean that they should write an Uncyclopedia article. A for Effort, an F minus minus for execution. And Execution is just what this article needs TD 19:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Painfully unfunny. --Unfuhghettaboutit 04:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. --(~Sir)Nuke || Talk v MUN v Not An Admin v Completely Unimportant 06:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. --Spang 17:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

## Chinese Room

• Is this funny, or shall we just delete it now? Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 14:30, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - It's so funny, in fact, I have awarded it the WWGAE. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• See, another example of pages that need to be archived under an "Uncyclopedia's Worst" project. This is an excellent example of barely coherent (provided you try hard enough) writing, about a bad topic, to use a poorly implemented joke which isn't working. Delete if we must, but if there's a place to store our "Top 100 shitty articles", I'd say that's a primo choice. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 15:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it. --Jdisbell 16:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 06:15, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

## Useless, unused, or redundant templates

-- 06:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

• Huff them all. --Splaka 06:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, maybe except random-rewrite with "Can we fix it?" merged into it. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 08:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• I like "can we fix it", "Why You!" and "Burn" (which happens to be used on qvfd if I'm not mistaken...The rest can be flushed, I guess TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Burn is unused. The one on QVFD is a copy of the code. And can we please delete all of them so they don't proliferate again? Maintenence is growing to be an increasingly large job and I would like it to be less of a joke and more of something official. -- 21:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Huff all. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 06:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

## Hair band

• Consider it Nerved! The people have spoken, and as such, we may consider the Voting Closed! TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:29, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

## King George III

• I quite nearly nerved this, but decided to show mercy and compassion by putting it to a vote. I still say delete, but others may disagree. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 19:15, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Seems like a bit of a random rant to me. I wouldn't argue against NRV Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 23:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

NRVed: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
In the future articles like this can probably just be NRVed in the first place.

## %s

How did this article survive for so long? printf("%s", "[copyrighted word removed per request, please don't sue me]") - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• Hey! Smashy's MY line! --H. 20:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete!: This article is terrible. And stubby. And nowhere near as good as Duel Masters. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 20:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Probably owing in part to having consumed large amounts of my namesake tonight, I can see that this has a little potential. I'm happy for delete but would also encourage NRV to give the author a brief chance to improve it. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 23:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• No redeeming values, delete. --Johnfn 13:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

## The Thirteen Days of Christmas

• I put this up for vfd a while back, but apparantly never followed up on it. My bad. Fortunately, it's a mistake easily Corrected. Delete. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)17:54, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• The ending made me laugh, but it could do with a rewrite to make it stronger. --Johnfn 13:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN
• Delete. Though another option might be Heavily trim and Merge with Christmas, though the Christmas article could use a rewrite.--(~Sir)Nuke || Talk v MUN v Not An Admin v Completely Unimportant 08:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There are maybe two or three lines that are salvageable, but it'd be easier to start it again from scratch. --Xoid 11:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• This really has to go. A stupid stub that oscillates between "dead baby jokes aren't funny" and "dead baby jokes are hilarious" (to paraphrase) and then a list of unoriginal material. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 23:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Just to clarify, I do find Dead Baby Jokes amusing. At least, the ones I can stomach to tell. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 05:48, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Q: What is not red, unfunny and has no chance of survival? --Imrealized 04:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Microwave it with the baby. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 11:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - If we're happy with lists, then I'm happy. The jokes aren't bad and if that sort of thing is okay here, then okay. Guinness2702 (talk) MUN 23:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• A list of dead baby jokes? That's fuckin' classic. Of course, I snagged the whole thing and dumped it to an ODT file for posterity, and having saved them for later enjoyment, we can Delete this article. -see below- User:TD 15:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Dame  16:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Unlike a truckload of bowling balls, you can unload this article with a pitchfork. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: I'm going to have to go against the flow and I'd like to explain why. Uncyclopedia is devoted to parody and satire but we also harbor other forms of humor and despite being kind of old, dead baby jokes are funny sometimes. So, really, what reason is there not to serve as a repository for some bad jokes; Hell, if it stays around, I'll know somewhere that I can go if I ever want more dead baby jokes. --Sir gwax (talk) 21:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'm nothing if not impressionable. I change my vote to Keep and follow gwax's lead... like a sheep. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 22:13, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Smashy with the pillow-hammer (ie. "weak delete"). Keep in mind that, while dead baby jokes are witty by definition, this is not much more than an extremely long LIST of them. --H. 06:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Could use a rewrite with the best ones on the page, because really I didn't find it funny at all. --Johnfn 13:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Maul - An uninspired mess. I was going to vote to keep it, but then I realized I had nothing positive to say. — 2ND LT. Sir Edward, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC)