Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive29

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Southampton

Template

  • BALEET: Oh look, it's a page with a bajillion and one irrelevent templates; please tell me there's no one out there that actually finds this funny. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Show mercy. I find that funny, strange or not. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Useful for Noobs I have been looking to put together a list of templates I like to use... my guess is this is an attempt at the same. I say keep. Or rewrite it to be a list of favorite/really useful templates -- User:TD blabber
  • Messed up gwax does make a good point (even though he deleted my article). Since it is more organized, delete it. --TimeStopper 22:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Giant Hogweed 01:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Templates. Good crimony, people. Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 15:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to HowTo: Templates. List is bad.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 04:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
REDIRECTED --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Stoner

Neurotypical syndrome

Either should be deleted or rewritten, since most of it is taken from here. --Jsonitsacsig jsonitsac talk to me crimes against humanity23:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - Hmm... Creatable--Jtaylor1Small Egg 01:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: 0 net votes is no delete. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

American Commitment to the Rights of Man

  • I think this belongs on a myspace or live-journal. I hear the "web"-"logging" is quite the rage these days --ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 21:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep What's so bad with this page? --TimeStopper 21:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Reply on your talk page--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 21:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
      • I liked it too, but Flam is right here, the article was WAY too biased. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Bullshit. You bunch of pussies. Real satire is just too...oh *fear and trembling* it's too biased for Uncyclopedia. Jesus. I thought a few people here had the moral equivalent of testicles but apparently not. The only problem with the article was that it had a fair amount of factual material. Chickenshit candyasses. If you ever get a hair I got a copy of the article and I can repost it. If you ever get enough grit to stand up for anything other than "AAAAAA" and gamerboi crap, that is. ;) ----OEJ 18:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm convinced; I've restored the article and unless Flam deletes it again, we'll deal with this using the standard method of voting on the matter. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
I dunno, it just seems bitter.
But to sum up: the Bush administration views the US Declaration as asswipe. 
The only human rights it respects are...uh. It respects the right...to...um.
Well, actually, there are no human rights that the Bush administration honors. 
None. Sorry about that. Thomas Jefferson really has turned into Joe Stalin.
The question I ask myself with these sorts of pages is, if someone managed to write something similar on the right-wing side, would I vote to keep it? Is the language itself suitable as satire, or is it, in fact, angry/bitter. Maybe i'm not reading close enough, but I still get that feeling.--ShroomsShroom!Gay2Sir Flammable KUN Prince%21.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2Shroom!Shroomirror 18:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Personally, I would have voted to keep it, but I only have the candy equivalent of testicles. --Some user 18:11, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
OK, the "its unfunny" critique is justified. The article is also less than 24 hours old and my single brain cell does not work quickly. I'll go for less bitter and more funny in future revisions. Thanks for relenting, incidentally; I really didn't expect that (nor did I expect the Spanish Inquisition...yet here I am in the Comfy Chair.) If the vote goes against it after some revision, so be it. (heh, just noticed on rereading comments -- "too biased" and "not biased enough" -- ain't that the way it goes with everything? People want the opposite things from an article...)----OEJ 20:56, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Thoughts as the piece evolves: Certain kinds of satire confront comfortable conventional "wisdom" with uncomfortable contradicting observations. Any fundamentalist Christian would find Twain's Letters from the Earth uncomfortable: "[The Bible] is full of interest. It has noble poetry in it; and some clever fables; and some blood-drenched history; and some good morals; and a wealth of obscenity; and upwards of a thousand lies." To a fundamentalist the Bible has no obscenity and does not lie.
The point of the article to hand should be similar: it should confront the comfortable conventional wisdom ("America is acting reasonably and with just cause") with uncomfortable observations (the moral philosophy of the rights of man is being systematically trashed). Now, I only wish I could write like Twain. But to my mind every particle of this piece should work to one end: to contrast the egalitarian vision of the American and European Age of Reason with what is really happening in Guantanamo Bay, in the Afghanistan camps, in Abu Ghraib, and in the extra-judicial measures taken against people inside and outside America.
No, it is not straight comedy. It's a different animal from You have two cows and the magnificent Going to California. It works by different means to a different end. But I believe the only place it really belongs IS on a satire site. Personally, I don't think Uncyc is limited to only one kind of article, but that's just my opinion.
Yeah, the piccie of the Constitution with a brown smear on it is a shocker. I dunno if it's justified. I think that in Twain's day writers didn't use obvious stuff like that, but today...I dunno, in the era of Beavis and Butthead is the Constitution picture really out of line? Maybe it is too explicit. I dunno, give a holler if you have an opinion on it.----OEJ 19:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
The problem that I see here is that you obviously have very strong feelings on the matter because of a deep, moral sense that what the Bush Administration is doing by screwing with the Constitution (or, more specifically, the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights) is motivated by pure evil, and it is very difficult to seperate yourself from that. Thus, some things come out really furious, like the "Thomas Jefferson is morphing into JOSEF STALIN!" bit, instead of a witty zing, like having Bush honest to God confusing the two in college, then refusing to listen to anyone but his closest advisors about it once he's President, and they're all too ashamed to tell him any differently. THAT'S more satirical and less, "God, I hate Bush so much."--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 20:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

VOTE BELOW THE LINE


  • Neutral (for now): I like it but I'm not sure if that's because I'm a damned dirty liberal or because it's actually good. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. And I'm glad this came up, actually - apparently my testicles make a good bon-bon substitute. --Some user 18:23, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Unlike most of you people, I have no balls, and my weinersnitzel is the size of a blue cartoon frog. I am therefore immune to the mockage of my genatalia, as I've already heard all the good ones. However, I must disagree with the previous posts and declare that this article IS biased. It's sin is that it is not biased enough. It's too close to the truth, so many will stop after it begins criticizing the Bush Administration and not read the juicy parts about how Uncyclopedia's reporters have learned that every Gitmo detainee has been fed into a combine (or some equivalent, I forget what). Anyways, it's a keep, though I still think it needs some TLC to either be more or less biased throughout.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 18:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • BALEET! LameBlogopedia strykez again!! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 20:47, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Contains too much of a personal perspective. Walk the Plank. --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!21:16, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Bias can be funny, but this reads more like a long, drawn-out editorial than a humor piece. --Naughtius Maximus Leaf F@H Woof!Za slice MeowMUN 22:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Where's the satire? Donald Rumsfeld using the Declaration of Independence (or Constitution, I can't remember) as toilet paper? HAW haw HAW God that's good, I never thought of that. This is a clear statement of personal belief, fueled by bitterness, and leaving the funny lost in the lurch. Maybe insecure liberals (I consider myself a secure liberal, by the by) need something like this to let them sleep at night, but this is playing down to a Karl Rovish level in terms of mindless attack politics. Also, I'm just not sure how this article will help us win the War on Tourism. We need to be unificators - not disassemblers. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 13:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. What Weasel said. This type of rant doesn't belong here. --Zyrac 14:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP. Give him a chance to keep working on it, at least. I'd rather slap it with the {{funny?}} template and monitor it for awhile, before killing off a potentially very good piece. ~ T. (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Gwax needs an attitude change. I am really hurt. However, I agree with Todd Lyons.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 19:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Could I just interject here to point out that the aforementioned testicles also make a delicious pie topping, when put through a cheese grater? --Some user 01:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Liquify - I have to agree with those saying that this stuff belongs to blogs. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep it is different in style to much of Uncyclopedia, but I'd like to see it evolve. Perhaps in its own related subsection though? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 14:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Flush it. I totally agree w/ Weasel. -- The Larrikin, 2 March 2006
  • Keep. Just allow articles like Holy Bible: Revised Liberal Edition to not be deleted or rewritten as well. It seems the liberals had issues with that one being biased and rewrote quite a bit of it. As long as articles on the left and right are just as biased as each other, I really do not see a problem. I mean we got the mother of biased articles at George W. Bush if you delete this one, you got to delete the rest of them that it ties into as well as many others. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 22:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
KEPT: Ok, we all agree that it's very biased, but some people find it funny and those that think that it's unnecessarily biased and don't like it, can fix it (we are a wiki after all). If a revert war develops, someone talk to an admin, that's how things work. We at Uncyclopedia are not in the business of censorship; we're not in the business of saying what's ok; we're in the business of being funny, that's all. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

{{WIP}}

  • Due to advances in TimeStamp™ technology, {{construction}} serves the same purpose. Work In Progress is left in the dust. The {{ugly}} dust. --KATIE!! 19:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Walk the plank, matey! --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!23:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep or at least redirect to {{construction}}. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|CUNT|+S 18:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to construction, mark as deprecated. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 10:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: I don't think they're quite as redundant as you think. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: I loves this ugly piece of crap, and have proudly used it half a dozen times. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 16:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's excellent. --Consuelos 19:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep it. w00t WIP! -- The Larrikin, 2 March 2006
KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Family Guy

Horridly, dreadfully unfunny. Oh, HAHA! I GET IT! Everybody's from The Simpsons, and not Family Guy! OH MAN THAT'S CLEVER except not. --Consuelos 03:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Ninja Wars

  • Delete. I wrote this page originally. But I've since decided it's crap. I just don't care to expand into all the links and it really doesn't make much sense. ~~Kerakazz

IPod chair

KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

IHolla

  • Murder. I completely, utterly cannot get it, and the formatting and image don't please me. - 04:46, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Giant Hogweed 06:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - I am well-pleased. Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 16:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep The bottom section on Problems is good enough for me... the rest could be rewritten/expanded. User:TD User Talk:TD
  • Keep and perhaps slap Template:Black humor on it (at the risk of being lynched) --Bloodrage 21:56, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It could definitely be improved though. --—rc (t) 05:14, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Adams Grammar School

  • Delete it has nothing to do with anything anymore Unsigned --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Not relevant to anything. Also has no content. Delete. Unsigned --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Deleted anyway. Someone wiped the article and replaced it with:
"This site has caused offense to some members of staff and/or pupils at Adams' Grammar School, which has caused unnecessary problems. If this page is to remain here, it should do so without any content which could be misunderstood as offensive towards any member of staff or pupil of the school. The staff are aware of who I am, and I also added content to this site which was inappropriate. I am writing this as a "peace offering" if you will. Any offensive material will be removed immediately by either myself, or an Uncyclopedia admin. Thank You."
The contents prior to the blanking were a (really) crappy, (barely) allowable vanity page with no real value at all. Huffing seemed like the appropriate response. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
If he were a registered user, I would have said something about the first ammendment to him, but oh well, so be it. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Sounds like something that happened to me.--UtarEmpire 04:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Middlesex

Co.Durham

  • Ouch. This article makes me want to scoop my now contaminated brains from my skull. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)
  • Destroy in a rain of fire. --Giant Hogweed 02:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

99 Problems but the Papacy ain't one

  • Stab it with a clotheshanger -- TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)
  • Or two... -- The Larrikin
  • Delete or List Tag. This is a list-related article.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

December 21st, 2012

  • The Grand Inquisitor Torquemada wants this Nth unfunny end of the world article burninated for heresy. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:29, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I shall add wood to the pile and watch from a safe distance. --Giant Hogweed 17:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Throw on a coupla peasants for me. -- The Larrikin 2 March 2006
  • Merge it with 2012. Timeline-related article.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 19:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Throw out and burn the dumpster. --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!21:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
EAT/NRVed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Send this badboy back to Japan Dzugavili 04:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Why dont polar bears shit in the woods?

QVFD'd by someone else, but Splaka seems to think this is not QVFD material. So I'm proposing normal, vote-driven deletion. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

  • My Eyes! Okay, it doesn't burn my eyes, but this article should be shot, drawn, quartered, boiled in Margarine, ground up, fed to rabid starving dingos with halitosis, and then the dingoes should be shot, shot twice more, burned in a pyre, and whatever remains should be launched into the sun so as to not contaiminate the Earth. --Me
  • Delete & CVP. This question related article is really dumb.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 15:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Might have a chance as UnNews if it were expanded. --Trevie 16:01, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Clean this shit--Rataube 16:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Bury this shit. --Giant Hogweed 17:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I second all these guys --The Larrikin 2 March 2006
  • Strand on a desert island alone with naught but a gun and a single bullet. --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!21:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

War of the Talk Show Hosts

Hyrule Temple

  • Delete. --Giant Hogweed 06:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I played "Majora's Mask" and "The Adventures of Link". I would need more info. But this time, make it hilarious.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 07:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Maul - A colorful, incoherent mess. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, clean, and expand - Has a chance, but is too short to really convey a good joke. --Trevie 16:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Never mind, delete - Too random to be coherent. --Trevie 16:29, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It could use a complete make-over. I agree with Jtaylor1 that it has to be hilarious, or I'll change my vote. -- The Larrikin 2 March 2006
  • Crush it. --Sir Velair Wight 03:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The Uncyclopedia Discipline

  • Just Delete it. I'm a really bad writer.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 05:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV. Good idea, but lists are auto-NRV/VFD candidates. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or modify - I like it, but it's just a list. --Trevie 16:33, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Modify. I like some of the comments, but there needs to be substance. -- The Larrikin, 2 March 2006

Stutter

A pathetic attempt to start a flamewar with Keitei. Irredeemable. Delete at all costs. --Syndrome 04:59, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Gamecube

My ex-girlfriend

REDIRECTED --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikiese

KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Mach 3 Triple Bladed Katana

This is pretty crappy weak delete--Count of Monkey Crisco 05:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - NRV, straight up. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: This idea has so much potential, I can't even come up with the right word to describe it. The implementation is utter and complete crap, but if someone could rewrite this, preferably with a little bit of photoshopping involved, we could have an absolute gem on our hands. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 14:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Rebuttal: You, sir, are deluded in your thinking. Nothing, not even an amusing photoshop of a samurai in full battle armor wielding such a device in order to deliver a close shave to a hirsute Ordinary Joe, could bring this idea anywhere near gem-status. Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 15:54, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Well, this is one case where I get to agree with Gwax: the idea has potential. There's no need to keep this particular article, though; it can always be recreated if needed. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Dispose of in the proper waste container. Keep out of reach of children. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep & flag for rewrite: I think there has got to be a way to make this article shine... the line about a "29% increase in asskicking efficiency" by itself justifies it's existence. If my photoshop skills could produce anything better than the occasional breast enlargement, I'd be all over this like Ike on Tina -User:TD complain here
  • Comment: The hero from "The Sword and the Sorcerer" carried a localized version of this product. --Giant Hogweed 23:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or rewrite with an illustration. A pic would make it at least bearable. I for one, however, don't think it's worth the effort of saving. --PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey!21:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Substantial rewrite has taken place, voting reset. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:59, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Dick

  • Delete. It's not funny, there is no way for anyone to make this material funny. Get rid of it. --Kaizer_the_Bjorn [talk] MUN F@H 02:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Make it go away. --Giant Hogweed 03:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. I think it has potential but needs a lot of work (I am not willing to put in) Darcken 01:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No more penis-related article, please.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 09:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to Penis: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Things Invented By Scots

Article not tagged, votes invalid. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete, you pain in the tooch. --Boy Toy bitch at me 19:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Get me a can of List-be-gone.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 09:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Handjob

Article not tagged, votes invalid. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Now that it's tagged... delete. Writer needs to learn meaning of subtlety (this coming from someone who just wrote about butt-sniffing, but hey). --Iritscen 16:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Delete. I know you like to make up your rules for VFD, but the people who saw it here thought it was huff-material, and I think that won't change if the article is tagged... --Boy Toy bitch at me 19:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 22:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Darcken 01:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Jack Bauer

  • Isn't this too similar too Chuck Norris? Kill.--Rataube 22:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kinda similar to Chuck Norris, but it's pretty funny for 24 fans. Keep. --Consuelos 23:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. As long as it doesn't devolve into some variant of OMGVINDLSRULZ or RNDHSFRVR, thus maintaining a distinct Bauer flavor, I'll respect it. --Giant Hogweed 00:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • CAPITAL DELETE. Enough Chuck Norris jokes, specially if they don't involve Chuck Norris. --Boy Toy bitch at me 02:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. We need some Jack Bauer. May need rewriting however --Dr. Pepper 09:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This article started as info on Jack Bauer, but slowly mutated to too many Chuck Norris references. Somebody just got lazy. This can be restored to its original Bauer glory. And this WILL happen. Wait and see. - Oscar Wilde.

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:02, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Barefoot radio

  • Load the Gat: Does anyone get this? Vanity page, devoid of humor or interest, lots of effort, but still makes me feel like ramming a chainsaw into my face.-- TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)
  • Rewrite. I don't think it's vanity.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Yeah, but it still stinks like a filthy chocolate starfish -- TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)

Gay cowboys

  • Stabbity Death: Nothing makes me happier than making fun of cowboys, except perhaps making fun of homosexuals. This captures none of the magic felt in either case -- TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)
  • NRV. I think it makes perfect sense about homosexuals.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:40, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete It's a well known fact that gay cowboys are to busy having sex with other gay cowboys to penetrate livestock. --Spin 03:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The author didnt even say "I want to quit you". --Nytrospawn 15:14, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • BURNiNATE. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 06:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Bushian logic

Dan Brown

  • Torch!: Does anyone find this funny? I don't --TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) Cameron 19:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. NNP.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:24, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Purge. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 03:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Rataube 03:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Grand slam the article. --Sir Velair Wight 04:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Deleeed--Spin 03:40, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

OpenVMS

  • Throw the Switch!: Lacks luster, development, effort, and length. Faint shimmerings of hope distract the brain, but needs a major overhaul, tune-up, repainting, better tires, a transmission and an oil change. --TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)
  • QVFD? - Some Other Asshat 02:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to Undictionary.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 09:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Spin 03:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • -d--Spin 03:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Itavisen

  • Nuke: What the fuck? Almost an Abomination! --TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)
  • Flush It.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 09:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Deleted Was qvfd quality. I think. I already deleted it, so I'm not sure.--Spin 03:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Alcohol

Needs to be deleted, and the 6 articles in the category moved to Category:Drink where needed (I came across it because of an article that was in both). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


REDIRECTED to Category:Drink: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere

Dhyllan McEnroe

Missing Persons Bureau

  • Delete. Spam.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 04:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Make it go missing. Dzugavili 05:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Ah-ha-ha-ha-no. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 01:39, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Awfully clever of the poster to try to avoid VFD by including a crappy picture, though. --Some user 06:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 'Missing Persons Bureau'. For great justice.--Ryoske 10:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • EXTERMINATE (I'm doing Dahlek impersonations today! I'm a trashcan with a plunger!) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to 404: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

The_Polish-Italian_Mafia_Peoples

Looks like vanity to me. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 04:12, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Toast - Unfunny. --Trevie 16:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Microwave on High for 90 minutes. --Some user 06:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill the foo'!--Ryoske 10:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Whack 'em. NNP wannabe gangsters get the piano wire... --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Jeork

Appears to be vanity or some unfunny in-joke. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. If I'd seen it on QVFD, it would already be gone. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. That was funny, actually. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 01:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - for great justice!--Ryoske 05:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Sometimes I just can't imagine what these people are thinking. --Some user 06:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Paragraphs, man, paragraphs. --ComaVN 13:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • DESTROY --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

NetBattle_Clans

Mozilla Firefox/old

Category:ACS Approved Articles

Huffinatored. It was apparently part of an allowable vanity project whose authors are still learning the ropes. I'll teach them what Knot to do. (he he get it ropes knots aw fukit) -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 20:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Barbie doll


REDIRECTED to Barbie: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Toyota Starlet Glanza

* Delete - I had to look this one up - it's a compact made by Toyota. So the article, naturally, pokes fun at it by classifying it as a main battle tank. Obscure topic, poor execution. Funny picture, though. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 14:24, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep: My friend had this car. It sucked. It had the engine power equivalent to 300hp (hampster power). I find the irony beautiful. Plus, it's like an in-joke that I get. --TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)
  • Slightly Weak Keep. Many pages on Uncyc are obscure. And the pic almost justifies its existence singlehandedly. --Iritscen 16:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep--Spin 01:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 03:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV. I would expand this if i were you.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 01:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Ye mob hath spoken - I added some "jokes," cleaned up the grammar, and made it more pleasing on the eye. Now I want it kept, so admins, keep it, if you would. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 15:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Batmobile


KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

United States Bill of Rights

not funny at all. the subject deserves something other than this. looks like conservative propaganda. i tried to change some of the ammendmant page to make them better, but somebody reverted it. --Samael775 02:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

  • What? Keep. --Giant Hogweed 02:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Blow it up and do over - With some work, this could be terrible. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 13:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Some people actually find this funny (I may have chuckled - a bit)... -- The Larrikin
  • NRV.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Some of the ammendmant pages have moderately amusing stuff, but it could be so much better. --Samael775 23:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
  • BALETED! Absolute crap. Chuck Norris despises the ancestors and descendants of whoever wrote this. He is quite angry.
  • Rewrite Opposite != funny. BUT, there should be an article like this, just funnier and more subtle. --Iritscen 16:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Smashy, complete with all amendments. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 06:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

IPod Macro

keep Good parody of how iPod's keep getting smaller. could use a re-write though.(re-edited-forgot to sign :O)--Bilbobaggins 04:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Ralph Nader

  • Keep. Was initially NRV, but Splak suggested I bring it here for a vote. The article is greatly improved from its original form. -- Rei 16:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I abstain. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Despite exceptional quality of prose and highly developed humor, I doubt that the joke will be humorous to anyone with an IQ of 7 or higher, so Delete TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)19:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It has some real charm but could do with expansion.--Winston 19:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

100 Worst Geek Insults

Wunschbox

Paiway Underberg

  • Delete.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:05, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Yikes, it's another massively-extensive vanity universe! Did you post that originally, JT, and now you just want it to go away? Or was that someone else's IP? I'm confused. --Some user 06:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill the foo'!--Ryoske 10:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--167.217.4.123 19:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 19:31, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Pokémon Trainers


REDIRECTED to Pokémon: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

The holocaust

  • Moved here from NRV. Supposedly expanded, but still a mess of semi-random fragments and made-up quotes. --Carlb 03:41, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Holocaust. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 03:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Yecch. --Some user 06:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redir --Splaka 11:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect as suggested.--Winston 19:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to Holocaust: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:28, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Nintendoland

  • Delete: This article is like a bacterial infection... Best to cut the thing off before we have to amputate the whole hard drive TD 03:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, utter crap. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 03:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Nintendo.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 05:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • If this article were a person, I would kill it. -- The Larrikin The Larrikin 00:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 19:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

REDIRECTED to Nintendo: voting closed --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Rolle Fingers

Forum:Pokerealm

Gentlemen's Shaving Club

Bekkestua

Now THAT's funny! --TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here)

The Shaqiaddossey

Moved here from NRV per Forum:Save The Shaqiaddossey!.

  • Meh, delete. Too random. --Iritscen 16:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This ain't a place to put your lyrics in.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 21:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 22:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • A useless lyrics page with no purpose. Decapitate. --Sir Velair Wight 01:09, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 19:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Colin Fry

Electric scissors

  • Using Electric as a prefix to make something "funny"? Steve Jobs? Ninjas? Strikes me as cliche. Delete. --Iritscen 16:42, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Snip. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 22:34, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 04:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--Winston 19:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects