Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive26

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(November: Adding Category:Pages with deprecated tags. Please make this page compliant with current HTML standards!)
 
Line 450: Line 450:
 
*'''Keep''' it's pretty good, if a little short - --[[User:M00t|M00t]] 08:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Keep''' it's pretty good, if a little short - --[[User:M00t|M00t]] 08:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 
</s>
 
</s>
'''KEPT''': It's plenty decent for an article about a month. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 04:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
+
'''KEPT''': It's plenty decent for an article about a month. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 04:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)<noinclude>[[Category:Pages with deprecated tags]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 02:10, April 27, 2011

The longest article in the world

  • Eat. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 16:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • The longest article in the English language is "the." Everyone knows that! Oh, and delete. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Unless some admin erases this page real soon I am going to write the longest and most lame explanation ever upon why this page really shouldn't be a part of Uncyclopedia anymore and therefore should be instanty deleted. --Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 17:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: I am in concurrance with all that has already been said. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Aïsha

  • Huff this non-notable (?) person, the page is bad too, externally linked images, ugh. --Splaka 04:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Non-notable!? [1]. Its about Mohammed's most famous wife whom was widely regarded as a little girl. --Mrasdfghjkl 05:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
At least rewrite it then, and get rid of the dumb external images? --Splaka 05:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Hey don't look at me. I just added the Kanye quote.--Mrasdfghjkl 06:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
MAUL - ARRRRRGH — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!) 12:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

FNORD!!

  • Just a really short mockery of Aolspeak and the Fnord article. I hope there isn't much more to say. DELEORT. --SirNuke 21:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD, even. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • for deletion I started it even, and I think it blows --Poofers 09:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Commack high school

Burninated already. --DW III CUNOUN 15:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Category:Things Kanye West accused George Bush of not caring about

Merged to Category:Things George Bush doesn't care about. ~ T. (talk) 03:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Murder. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • George Bush doesn't care about this category, so why give him something else to think about? His brain's running over capacity as it is. </badjoke> Delete. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. "Category:Things Bush doesn't care about" is enough--Rataube 19:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Move it to Category:Things that have been Mercilessly Huffed! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 21:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Michael Schumacher

Deleted. ~ T. (talk) 03:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Nihilism clones

Done. ~ T. (talk) 03:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Annihilate using weapons of mass deletion. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Super Nintendo

Euthanized. ~ T. (talk) 02:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Sectumsempra

Euthanized. ~ T. (talk) 02:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Maul - A list of Harry Potter spells, chock full of puerile sex humor, a dash of racism, and a heaping helping of terrible writing. — Bear 2ND LT. Sir David, Grizzly of Wild KUN VFH FP (Oh my God! Grizzly Bear! Nooooo!)
    • Huhhuh, you said cock. delete ComaVN 16:12, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Eh. Burn. --DeathByPie 13:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Warning - FanFiction.net Spillover in progress. Wipe and Dispose. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • He can keep it in his notebook. Smashy. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Hmm, a lot of effort went into this. Destroy. --Some user 02:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Guillotineicon "Guillotine," shouts his Majesty, "For it doth contain such sinful heresy that Satan himself cringeth at the mere mention of its name!" That, and it sucks.

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 03:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Dispell it. The shabby humor is forgivable, reminding me of F.A.T.A.L.[2] is not.--Count of Monkey Crisco 23:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Page

Nyarlathotep

Great Purge of MSN Messenger 6

Purerave

Deuncyclopedia

States of Matter

Liquidated (and quite deserved it, too). --DW III CUNOUN 16:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Nobody

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown03:07, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. It's at least mildly amusing. Just because you hate lists doesn't mean it should die. --Zyrac 20:29, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Some kinda robot

Gone. ~ T. (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

F13

Euthanized. ~ T. (talk) 02:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown03:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Beetle Bailey

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown03:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

The Emma Experiment

Chicago Bears

KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Igloo

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown03:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Peter Costello

  • Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 22:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD, idiot. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: Notable Australian politician. Yeah, it's a slam article. But what political article isn't?----OEJ 23:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It's not witty or funny. Simon Crean did a better job of summing him up by comparing him to Lawson's "The Loaded Dog". That was funny. --Skyring 05:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - factual. - David Gerard 23:53, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

CmdrTaco

Yo Momma Gas

Burned. ~ T. (talk) 15:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

German salute

  • Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 22:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete----OEJ 23:36, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. !funny --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Ja, mach es tot, bitte! (kill) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:21, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement.

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 02:53, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Danger Mouse

KEPT --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Find the Taco

KEPT. ~ T. (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Autoeroticabot

Deleted ~ T. (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Vanvania

I'm really confused about where to put this article. First off; it's not very funny and a bunch of random gibberish, but second; It's part of an article series. So I ask ye, fellow Uncyclopedians, merge, delete, or keep?--POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 15:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

  • If it's part of a series, then merge. Otherwise, delete. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Joe, you've uncovered another "vanity universe" where one or more authors has made up nonsensical fiction no one else gets. This is more of an admin-lvel issue - gwax has a definite distaste for these sorts of things, so you might want to track down all the related articles and let gwax know about it. Just a thought. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 18:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Double Comment. Wow, that sounds like some work, but I'll try it. Once I have the time; I mean. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 16:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or Move to User:Sockeye - The main article appears to be Haskodrome, and "Sockeye" hasn't been around for over 4 months. This isn't as good as "ToblerONE," which wasn't really all that great to start with, and if we're going to banish stuff like that to user pages, then IMHO we should be consistent and do the same here. --Some user 18:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is crap, gentlemen, comic crap. And I know a thing or two about writing incomprehensible crap. But oh, the light has been seen on the comic road to comic Damascus. User:Abbot Vesuvius 21:53, 12 February 2006 EST
  • Kill this. The other crap may have deserved a chance, but this is just... well, crap. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Move only if requested like the toblerONE guy did.--Rataube 02:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Pop star

NRV'd ~ T. (talk) 15:20, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

  • A very old stub. Delete or NRV. --Winston 07:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete. I assume someone could find it funny; even though I didn't. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 15:11, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Expand. It definitely has potential. My only complaint is that it's too short right now. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Just NRV it. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 18:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Bios

  • Delete. Encourages vanity, slander, and ill tempers. --Algorithm (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP, for the love of kittens! --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. --Boy Toy bitch at me 01:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Move back to being a user sub-page. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Erase from existence. Pointless randomness. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 01:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Boring as fuck. And I'm insulted by the lack of funny or effort in my bio. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Meh, I don't think it's vanity, no more vanity than the User List or the Admin List. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Chillout Lance--Rataube 01:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to user page and expand to include everyone who voted on it here.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep or move - How can I be Jerry and George Costanza? This is going to keep me up until the red red wine she puts me down. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 03:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but moderate and make it a part of Order of Uncyclopedia somehow. I found the entry on me to be particularly hillarious, (at least, the version that appeared at the time I read it) and uncyclopedic. But I think there ought to be some kind of rules drawn up to prevent vanity, slander and ill tempers. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 03:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Should a coup d'état arise as a result of this page, all the better. I find it amusing, and another incentive for users to work for some form of notoriety.

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 04:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment. ...another candidate for the Worst 100 series ? MadMax 04:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Ehh, keep - hey, I was amused (though I didn't actually snicker audibly). In keeping with Uncyclopedia best practice, I made a point of editing my own entry - David Gerard 05:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Check that again, David - I just proofed the whole thing and there was an edit conflict, and I might have overwritten your edit. (Sorry) --Some user 05:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Leave it be Someone has really bothered to find out that I and Ryoske make common edits.--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 09:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lame. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, rewrite gently. Some of the "bios" are amusing, some are total duds. I think that it's a fun concept, even if it is all slanderous lies! I am not lonely! (sob) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, or else I may cry. --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 16:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete because what the hell? --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 17:40, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep because I'm married to Bjork. Hubbahubba. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 17:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Buurrrnnnn and laugh as you do it. --KATIE!! 18:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I thought fixing it up would change my initial reaction, and it did at first, but I've reconsidered. Sorry... It's worth a chuckle or two, but it's too high-maintenance, and besides, Codeine still isn't on it. --Some user 01:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Killed There is an oprah-sized assload of funny shit that could be done for bios on the users and admins here. Unfortunately, this page had none (and by that I mean a negative amount) of it. I had expected to find a page of semi-in-jokes, bios based on edits, quotes, and behavior here, and some sort of internal logic. Instead I found a page of unfunny drivel, with no relationship to any of the peope listed. You could have changed the names around, and nobody would have noticed, because the descriptions were that vague and unconnected.

While Uncyclopedia is the "Queen of Making Shite Up"™, for gods sakes people you need to make up shite that IS ACTUALLY FUNNY! And has some sort of flow, consistency, and attachment to the real world. I am ashamed that an article so devoid of humor, with a premise so potentially golden for comedy, has lasted this long on VFD. I draw the curtain upon it. There will be no encore. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

mmmm... I count Keep +4.--Rataube 13:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Yep, me too. It adds up to +4 to keep it. --Boy Toy bitch at me 15:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
We'll need to delete the template that goes with it (see my user page). --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 17:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Whilst there were many votes for keep, the truth is that it was slandanity and did not deserve to be kept. Whilst I found my own bio amusing, it was not particularly humorous, especially to anyone besides me. I stand behind Famine's decision. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
I think what the admins are saying is the idea/joke could be good, but wasn't executed well enough. If someone were to put this on a userpage, then go through edit summaries to come up with honest-to-god funny stuff about every person, this has a chance. As it is, it was just slandanity, funny for pretty weak reasons.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
A legitmate way to encourage users to be notorious or shamefully plain slandanity? Humorous or unhumorous? To be or not to be? How to decide if the arrows of fortune should take it down or not? Isn't that what the voting is for?--Rataube 23:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Even though the score was positive, it was not overwhelmingly so. Besides, admins should have the final say over what goes in the seemingly "official" Uncyclopedia: namespace. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 23:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Score one for Volte, score one for Bradaphraser. The Uncyclopedia namespace is supposed to be for actual, "official" Uncyclopedia stuff. This was not, at all. Additionally, it was poorly done. If someone wants to take a run at this, go at it. Invite other users. Make it up right. There is huge potential for a run of humorous bios, especially since we have at least an occasional tradition of making up user-bios. Remember, folks - quality, not quantity. Make a couple of really good bios, and all will be well. In fact, if they are good enough, users might actually want to paste them on their userpages. Make a page of piss-poor ones that don't reach a paragraph each, and watch them slip away into deleted-land. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey guys, it's RC whining again. "Etc., etc." will denote arguments that have already been made elsewhere and which I won't repeat in full for fear of making this post too long for the majority of Uncyc's reader base to struggle through. I don't have strong opinions about this page either way (hence I didn't vote on it), but I disagree with the unilateral removal, etc., etc. I do think it should not be in the Uncyclopedia: namespace, but moving it to "Uncyclopedia Bios" or "Losers With No Lives Bios" or something is easy enough, especially when the vote was positive. Sure, as Volte said, admins should probably have the final say in what goes in the Uncyc namespace, but admins are not the final arbiters of humor, etc., etc. And if it actually comes to that, that we determine everything that goes into the wiki, well, what's the point of the whole thing? Yes, I realize that exceptions should be made sometimes in voting, etc., etc., but I don't think this is one of those times. --—rc (t) 07:27, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I don't usually rock the boat like this, but I feel very strongly that this page is very much against the spirit and mission of Uncyclopedia. As Algorithm said at the top, it "Encourages vanity, slander, and ill tempers." Calling Nintendorules "Dick", and saying that he works for Sony, by being a dick on the internet and stirring up anti-Nintendo feelings is exactly why I don't think this article should live. It already contained 43 crappy bios, and with that sort of momentum, I see no way it could gotten any less vanity-filled or slanderous. For every user to have a decent bio, (more than a paragraph) we'd be looking at hundreds of pages of text. There's a place for these pages - it's called individual User-Pages.
I fully support user-created bios done by other users - however, lumping them all into one massive page is not the answer. I suggest that a Category:Bios be created, and that bios be placed either on user-pages or User:ThatUsersName/Bio instead. It will prevent the massive page-fuck that this page was turning into, and encourage large-scale, amusing bios. As more people slapped their and other's names onto that page, it would have become impossible to do any real good work for any user. Potentially good idea in principal, bad execution. Bios need to be tailored and crafted, not mass-produced and dumped into a steaming heap together. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 15:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps I should've created a Template saying "This page is a sketch. Uncyclopedia is a wiki. Feel more than free to edit it." and added to the page. Famine, the page was in its first days and you didn't even give it a chance to improve. As for the lenght of the page, it wouldn't be the first one. You have two cows can support it. As for the quality of the page, it's better then other articles that lived, such as EuroiPods (a futile fight to prevent it from getting deleted, which should've happened) and Fisher Price (think about it. You chose to keep a page that contained "go eat shit fuckers"), besides the lack of opportunity and time for its improval. I'm all for it being restored as one, perhaps not on the Uncyclopedia namespace (which I got permission by two admins), but at the least, somewhere, and GIVE IT SOME TIME to get better. --Boy Toy bitch at me 15:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
I totally agree with Famine about Nin's particular Bios (see Uncyclopedia talk:Bios). Acid said he would change it if Nin requested. Nin not only not requested it, but he edited his Bios and left the Dick thing. So if he want to insult himself, we should advice him not to do so, but it's his choice. About the rest, well, I couldn't express it myself better than RC alredy has.--Rataube 15:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Caternest You have been cited in Uncyclopedian Bios.
Apparently you are "notable".
Don't ask me why; I think you're lame.
I didn't take offense to the bio in particular, I just didn't find it funny. Not only were the bios unfunny, but you never know if other users will take offense to it, and I think that's the main reason it got huffed. It's immature and unfunny. Perhaps if people could scrounge up something decent, then perhaps this article could be given a second chance. As it is now though, I could see many users getting pissed. Insults might not be taken so seriously if they were actually funny, in which case this article could live. But alas, they weren't funny. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:59, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
I see You have two cows as an execlent example as to why we need to keep pages a managable length. It is so long now that as bad edits get made, and as really good entries get messed up, they don't get fixed. Nobody has the time and effort to keep a good eye on all the edits made to that page. And this is a page which doesn't encourage vanity and insults. I don't go messing with You have two cows because it doesn't really pertain to me - if people were writing smack about me there, I'd probably head in and muck around. The potential for hundreds of stupid/mean/vanity-filled edits there is low, as it's not an article built on flamebait, and it is not trolling lots of users. The potential for Bios to be that sort of page is really high, and the headache that could be a page the length of YHTC with that sort of edit mentality isn't something we really need.
As a good example of the stupid, mean spirited editing that a user-list/bio page can stir up, just look at the edits to the various forums-pages posted here. I've been keeping an eye on RangerBoard (which I listed above) because of these exact problems - there's a list of users, and a couple of morons are making insulting and stupid-ass edits to them. While only a handful of people from that site are active here, they are being dicks on at least a small scale. The potential for ey aey aey aey aey aey aey aey ar on the list has the potential to run across that list of bios.
I don't want to discourage making bios up - I just want to discoourage a massive clusterfuck of stupid edits, vanity and dickishness on a page that's too large to easily manage. Quality, not quantity. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 17:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree with everything Famine has said, and I'd like to maybe say that whether the decision to delete was "unilateral," "unfair," or any of that is up to gwax. He's taken over VFD and I'm sure he has policies about how things are run. As is, we don't really know how things are run in gwaxland, so I say he should have the last say. --KATIE!! 17:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

2 cents - Eh, it was nice to get a little recognition, but it wasn't very funny. And that cheshire cat template is starting to creep me out. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 18:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
There are pre-gwax rules for VFD. That's the point of voting, so that other people can give their opinions on a page. As for slandanity, it's a simple matter for users to remove their bios if they don't like them, to ask an admin (or Acid) to remove them if they're worried about being banned for vandalization, or for one of the admins to remove it himself if he feels it's too inflammatory. Besides which, all else aside, does this not fit the definition for allowable vanity? --—rc (t) 19:19, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
For. BTW, Keitei, your "accept the leader admin decition, do not protest, he knows better" position u are stating here and at the dump, scares me. Although I hate this kind of comparisions I must say it reminds me of "Il Duce ha sempre razone" (Italy, WW2).--Rataube 01:55, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
It's more laziness. I don't like dealing with VFD, and gwax does. Let him have his way. It's called sharing power and not being a pain in the butt. --KATIE!! 02:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
VOTING is sharing power.--Rataube 03:10, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Speaking of requests for insults to be removed so I don't be labeled as a vandaliser, I have one thing to say: The testimonials on Euroipods. CHANGE THE NAME NOW. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:59, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

I am a bit late to this conversation, but 1) bymy count the "move"s had it, not the "keep"s, and 2) it is now back as a user sub-page, which is how this page started. I am no fan of excessive admin power, but I think the admins should get to determine what can stay on the Uncyclopedia: namespace and they did. I don't see a problem here, specifically. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

As far a gwaxland is concerned, admins are meant to be tools for the average user, not the other way around. Except that we're smart tools that filter user input and do the right thing™. Again, in this case I stick by Famine's decision and reasoning. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:49, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
See, I told you I wasn't lonely... can I please get a hug?
Seriously, though, it was somewhat flattering to be considered worthy of highlight (I'm just the resident QVFD craphound, after all,) even if the entries were somewhat... inadequate, shall we say. As far as slander goes, I for one can't imagine being offended by something like this - someone could have written, "King In Yellow (Lester P. Sinkhole of Scratchbutt, Arkansas) is a mink farmer/molester who enjoys bovine lemonade and dry-shagging the corpse of his male wetnurse every Thursday before bowling" and I still would have smiled. Hell, nothing on this site is worth getting rankled over, IMHO, and I'm always confused and somewhat saddened to see people failing to take a joke (even if it's a bad one, it's still a joke.) Ultimately I'm somewhat sorry to see these Bios go before we could all really sink our teeth into them and make it worthwhile addition. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:47, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Golden age

  • Discuss - This was originally marked with NRV in what I can only assume was a joke. I'm new here, so I won't vote either way, but I'd like some comments. --Skyring 05:37, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete It is short and not very funny. Try to make it longer, and add a picture or two, then it won't get NRV'd so fast. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:44, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 15:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • NRV it back. Here it will get deleted even faster. Since the guy is new, I say give him the one week chance to expand it. Skyring: Articles have to be encyclopedia-like. If you want to write just one paragraph go to Undictionary--Rataube 15:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Point taken, but this is a co-operative venture, and I'm not sure why a more senior member can't show me how to make it up to a "keep" status. After all, if the article's deleted, we're left with the same four red-links that inspired me to start it off. --Skyring 19:21, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
      • Keep. Besides of being a co-operative site, we are a humor site, and as such, we can't allow ourselves to sink in a sea of stubs in the name of co-operativism, losing all the funny. So there are stubs that are too stuby to stay, which we call unredeemable and your first version was one of those. Now, your expanded one, in my eyes is the kind of stub that could actually encourage others to make their contributions. But don't be lazy, keep working on it!!--Rataube 02:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Re-NRV per Rataube. That should give you at least a week to work on it. By the way, your method of dealing with the original NRV tag (moving it to VFD for explanation) shows an unusual knowledge of Uncyc for a new user. Quite commendable. --—rc (t) 19:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, agree with RC that this was handled wisely by the original author. Also, creating an article to fill empty links is Good Policy. Might make article longer...maybe examples of Golden Ages for various things, eg Golden Age of Television, Golden Age of Outdoor Toilets, Golden Age of Silver Linings, whatever. Just a suggestion.----OEJ 19:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete- Skyring needs to be banned for removing an NRV tag--Jtaylor1 20:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
    • NO BAN! He changed a NRV tag into a VFD, which is a perfectly acceptable (and encouraged) action. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: short: yes, not great: yes, but bad: no. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:54, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Still short but not delete-worthy. --—rc (t) 03:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Pit Fiend BOB

  • This is crap. Delete. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete- This article is a bunch of spam and needs to be CVP'd.--Jtaylor1 08:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. There's no spam here, just parody spam. Rather funny parody spam, in fact. --Algorithm (talk) 08:52, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - Okay, not really funny, but too well written to grizzly. But, um...why the fuck is it Pit Fiend BOB? Isn't the subject material Pit Fiend BBQ? Fix that before you do anything else. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 12:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete with a +1 Mithril Dagger. As a raging, unabashed dork, I know what it's talking about. (But there's no spam -- how'd you get that?) Anywho, it's only funny to other D&D players, and even then it's no gut buster. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - sounds like vanity to me --Keithhackworth MUN 15:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Request -- could those voting to delete this article at least read it first? The content of this page cannot possibly be construed as vanity in any way whatsoever. --Algorithm (talk) 08:01, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
I did read it. I quote: Part of our secret lies in the 50,000 year old Pit we use - that's vanity! Well, at least we can agree that it's crap either way... --Keithhackworth MUN 12:56, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, well, I read it, and it's not funny. Delete. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 15:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's longer and funnier than BBQ, otherwise I'd suggest converting it to a banner ad and putting it in that article. I think that would be funnier. ----OEJ 00:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. It is not spam, but it is not an article either.--Rataube 14:09, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Activating Delete Ray... Swordmaster 21:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Scenesters

  • Terrible. Poorly written, poorly formatted, and terrible grammar/spelling. Besides, the articles we already have on Emos and Emo Kid are better. Blay 03:44, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • SMASHY! --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

King

  • The GuillotineiconGuillotine is His Majesty's recommendation as to the appropriate sentencing for this defilement. Short and unfunny.

CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown23:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Smashy. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Too much chuck norris, and not enough round house kicks. Kick it out --Toloran 01:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, but keep the pic, its kinda funny, and could be put to better use elsewhere. Blay 03:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Bubblegum Crisis (NES)

  • Game Over This article contains many words, they're arranged in extremely dry and unfunny patterns. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Not even that many words, really. Smashy like I did with my controller once. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I've seen the anime, this isn't funny. Nuke it--Toloran 01:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. I would have NRVed it, myself.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Dr. Digikitten

Bromine

  • Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 22:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. It is too short but the subject definitely belongs in an encyclopedia. Just needs some work.----OEJ 23:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Expand. Has potential to be funny. But OEJ, since when was this an encyclopedia? --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Parody encyclopedia, eh? Therefore some resemblence to non-parody encyclopedia is constructive. IMHO.----OEJ 23:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Have been working on it a little bit. Please re-read before terminating.----OEJ 00:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: it's a pretty solid start for an article about Bromine. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: It has plenty of potential. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

November

  • GuillotineiconGuillotine on charges of being short and unfunny.

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 20:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Smashy! --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:26, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep! Hee hee. "November does not exist in Germany." This is gold, gentlemen. Comic gold. - Abbot Vesuvius 21:50 12 February 2006 (EST)
  • Delete.--Rataube 02:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep it's pretty good, if a little short - --M00t 08:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

KEPT: It's plenty decent for an article about a month. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects