Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive25

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Robot: Converting/fixing HTML)
 
Line 371: Line 371:
 
:::Whether anything is "funny" or not is a subjective and not an objective measurement (hence voting, of course) so I can only offer my ''personal'' thoughts, Muffinscope. I find it difficult to pay attention and read all of toblerONE because the jokes have little connection to pre-defined cultural objects. Articles are ''short'' compared even to short stories. There is no time to develop characters and situations. Therefore many successful articles rely on readers' pre-defined mental images of well-known people and things. It's one thing to say "Peter danced into the meeting wearing a slinky black evening gown" and another thing to say "Chairman Mao danced onto the UN podium wearing a slinky black evening gown." It's mildly interesting that someone we don't know went to a meeting we haven't yet visualized wearing women's clothing, but most of us know about pudgy puffy Mao and the UN, and we therefore have pre-defined imagery for the scene. OK. So toblerONE is, in my personal opinion, trying to do the job of a comic science-fiction story on a site devoted to a much different kind of comic writing. Remember, a 500-word short story is incredibly short but a 500-word article is a pretty long one.--[[User:One-eyed Jack|--OEJ]] 13:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 
:::Whether anything is "funny" or not is a subjective and not an objective measurement (hence voting, of course) so I can only offer my ''personal'' thoughts, Muffinscope. I find it difficult to pay attention and read all of toblerONE because the jokes have little connection to pre-defined cultural objects. Articles are ''short'' compared even to short stories. There is no time to develop characters and situations. Therefore many successful articles rely on readers' pre-defined mental images of well-known people and things. It's one thing to say "Peter danced into the meeting wearing a slinky black evening gown" and another thing to say "Chairman Mao danced onto the UN podium wearing a slinky black evening gown." It's mildly interesting that someone we don't know went to a meeting we haven't yet visualized wearing women's clothing, but most of us know about pudgy puffy Mao and the UN, and we therefore have pre-defined imagery for the scene. OK. So toblerONE is, in my personal opinion, trying to do the job of a comic science-fiction story on a site devoted to a much different kind of comic writing. Remember, a 500-word short story is incredibly short but a 500-word article is a pretty long one.--[[User:One-eyed Jack|--OEJ]] 13:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
   
Ok, I'm willing to accept the possibility that I just don't get it, which happens sometimes but it really does seem like an inside joke to me. In general, inside jokes are frowned upon; [[:Category:Inside jokes]] primarily contains jokes that are inside to Uncyclopedia and funny to the general public ([[Kitten Huffing]], [[AAAAAAAAA!]], etc.) or that are inside to admins and manage to sleeze past policies ([[Edit War (video game)]], [[Fisher Price]], etc.). Based on my analysez of [[toblerONE]] and the possibility that I might be wrong or other people would find it funny, I put it up on [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion|vfd]] and as such it's no longer a matter for me to make executive decisions about. I strongly recommend weighing your case on vfd and seeing how other people feel about the matter. Thanks and I hope this can be resolved amicably. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 19:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
+
Ok, I'm willing to accept the possibility that I just don't get it, which happens sometimes but it really does seem like an inside joke to me. In general, inside jokes are frowned upon; [[:Category:In-jokes|Category:Inside jokes]] primarily contains jokes that are inside to Uncyclopedia and funny to the general public ([[Kitten Huffing]], [[AAAAAAAAA!]], etc.) or that are inside to admins and manage to sleeze past policies ([[Edit War (video game)]], [[Fisher Price]], etc.). Based on my analysez of [[toblerONE]] and the possibility that I might be wrong or other people would find it funny, I put it up on [[Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion|vfd]] and as such it's no longer a matter for me to make executive decisions about. I strongly recommend weighing your case on vfd and seeing how other people feel about the matter. Thanks and I hope this can be resolved amicably. --{{User:Gwax/sig}} 19:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
   
 
:'''As a weasel, and a wild weasel at that,''' I would like to add my two purloined chicken eggs to this discussion, if I may.
 
:'''As a weasel, and a wild weasel at that,''' I would like to add my two purloined chicken eggs to this discussion, if I may.

Latest revision as of 06:22, January 21, 2012

Noshit Sherlock

  • "Guillotineicon" or Off with it's head! for being short, slandanity, and otherwise just crappy.

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 07:09, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Away with dull care, such as this!--neca 10:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. It was created in march, amazing it wasn't deleted yet.--Rataube 10:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Super-powered People (Both Good, Evil and Benign)

  • This appears to be going nowhere fast; delete.--DWIII 23:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

A box of fuck

So be it. --T. (talk) 02:33, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Not funny, clever, or creative. --Winston 22:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. The writing style redeems it. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 22:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not a bad effort, but it's like a pastiche of tried and true comedy (i.e. "Fight Club" themed jokes, etc.) that somehow falls flat. Anyway, in happier times I would've called for a re-write. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 22:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: I find it not the funny. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 23:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: use of contradictory terms to horribly unfunny effect, I would have claimed a redeeming feature of Bathos if it didn't start out as being ridiculous --Olipro 23:59, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I like this page. It gives me a simple choise. I like simple choises. DELETE!--Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 00:09, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • GuillotineiconGuillotine it. --CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 01:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Explain what the fuck any of it means, then delete the fucking fuck out of it anyway. Really, is there even a joke here? --205.188.116.204 01:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delet not Uncyclopediaic. 149.151.177.118 02:23, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Holy shit, that was fast. It was gone before I even knew it was VFD'd.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 03:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Chernobyl

  • Delete. Turning random things into bands is not funny. --Zyrac 18:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Nuke. - Steve Ballmer 18:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuck,this entry is fucking hell funny why u gays want delet such funny thing?
    • Because we're not a bunch of worthless consumer models who think you can make anything funny by putting "is a band" after it. Annihilate. --Andrusi 18:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • dude liek i totaly like to put unsined votes up heer Delete. --Hobelhouse 18:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Look, it's feisty, I'll give it that, but I'd rather see Chernobyl and its little incident better sent up than the "is a band" tack. Such a disaster deserves better. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 22:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Billy Corgan

Honibo Tartrate

Norrissing

  • GuillotineGuillotine for assininity. One author (besides NRV taggers), not funny, and the but who wrote it defiled Oscar Wilde with this practice. Save Uncyclopedia through censorship!

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 14:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Rirhath B

Luigi

  • Delete. Not unfunny, but just a quote and three more lines--Rataube 12:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Pasta

  • Vanity--Jtaylor1 08:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep in dry storage until boiled for 10 minutes. --Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 08:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - How is this vanity? It's better than most the other things that are VFD'ed --Keithhackworth MUN 15:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, soak in olive oil - It needs some sauce and some parmeasan cheese, but it's not VFD material. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep; serve with a side of breadsticks expand. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 16:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Ghetto

Marty Meehan

Mark johnson

Lost but not... well, yeah, it's forgotten. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Zoidberg

'Swift execution -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit

Discussion moved to Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/clones

Owl blood

Alex Chiu

  • Someone threw a VFD tag on this, but forgot to put it up here. For once, I concur with the sentiment. Smells like slander. Delete. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • The strange part is, I actually knew who that was. The current article sucks; delete it. However, I would love to see one poking fun at him that doesn't suck. I'd do it myself, if it weren't for my lack of any work ethic whatsoever... --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, the author does make a valid point. I researched this guy, he has said some pretty crazy stuff. 'not delete' 3:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It is amusing but it needs to be expanded and made less crapy. Expand or Else Delete --Toloran 22:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 22:02, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • As author of this page, I admit it to be slaundrous crap. But please don't kill it. You said you had better ideas for it, so use them! Don't let Alex Chiu die!--19:42, February 6 2006
  • Delete Smells like adult vanity. Author needs to read HTBFANJS and Uncyclopedia: Vanity Policies--68.220.108.157 16:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

List of people who fight in the Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny

Interwebbernets

  • Short but not sweet. Behead. --biggy 23:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I second the Beheading motion Guillotineicon

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 03:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Graham Jones

  • Please delete this thing. --Joaopaulo1511 23:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It's existed twice as long as I've been here, and yet is still shorter than the VFD template. Guillotineicon Guillotione.

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 23:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

What IS this page??

Looks like someone already got rid of it. --biggy 23:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Total Ripoff

Ripped. ~ T. (talk) 11:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Game clone with about a dozen pages that apparently hasn't really been touched since July. --—rc (t) 01:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It's not funny, either. Have it lose the game deleted. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 02:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree, delete.--★J★o★e★ 16:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Ripoff--Rataube 16:19, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • GuillotineiconGuillotine, because not only is it a clone, but it is entirey unhumorous.

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 16:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Template:Liberal and Template:Conservative

Done. And no, we can't delete one and leave the other.  :) ~ T. (talk) 11:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Kill. The first was used on no pages, the second was used on a few, but mostly inappropriately. The cream of the crap was been NRV'd and the rest is now using normal Template:Rewrite. These templates have, in my opinion, not succeeded in aiding us in getting more quality pages and have caused arguments. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 00:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Bradaphraser 03:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --★J★o★e★ 16:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
    • After thought, Delete Liberal, keep Conservative.. --★J★o★e★MUN 18:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Some user 16:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • D-ELECTION.--Rataube 16:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Þ

Kaboomed ~ T. (talk) 11:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC) I think the author was driniking "Kool Ade."--Naughtyned 20:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Deities!

Deleted! Deleted! Deleted! Deleted! Deleted! ~ T. (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Fuck A Midget

Kaboomed ~ T. (talk) 11:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Larry Jesus Schaffer

Oh yeah! I forgot! I gotta remember my ginkgo. Heh, killkillkillkilldiediedie! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Portsmouth F.C., Southampton F.C., Stadio del Monte Del "Del Monte"

Three noses?!?!? -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 05:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete all 3; unfunny & anonymous vanity. --DWIII 03:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

MolokoBot

INPUT: CRAP. DELETE Y/N? _Y -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 05:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Kill Looks copy-pasted from the internets, with the name changed. --Splaka 02:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Defenestrate. It's a nice long list that I don't want to read, anyway. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 03:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Every Article In Category:Years

I seriously can't take that anymore, as far as i know they all suck, if one or two of them are goo, go ahead and keep those ones, but just those. Delete. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge them into fewer articles or a single namespace. They are mostly boring, but the concept is good as a wikipedia parody. Keep 1927 and don't merge it. Do u realize the high amount of redlinks resulting from their total deletion? --Rataube. 23:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Also keep 2034. We saved this one a couple of weeks ago.--Rataube 00:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
'Speedy Keep this was discussed before and the mood of the meeting was that what we have is likely to be as good as we are going to get, also if we do delete them as pointed out there will be redlinks all over the place and that unless we want to get rid of them all then people will just make up worse entries.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

See Uncyclopedia:Timeline and perform merges appropriately. This is a problem that has already been solved. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 16:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Take Over the World

Conquered.-- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete--Rataube 23:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

1337 (alphabet)

h4xx3d. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Factual. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 19:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Thee

  • Keep (moved from NRV by author). Under UN:DEL, I think this passes all 6 tests. For those who don't get the reference, the Canadian national anthem ends "O Canada, we stand on guard for thee." If someone thinks they can improve the content, be my guest.--Tom Veil 00:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you for following the proper method for removing NRV tags. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 02:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as it's too stubby to keep. I don't think I can improve it, but that's not my problem, as I didn't create it to begin with. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 00:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete or expand. I had NRV'd this because it was so short, so either expand it or let it die. Another paragraph or two should be enough to sustain it. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 00:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Expand. It has potential. Someone should commandeer it. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • OK, I expanded it. Sorry for not writing a full-length article to begin with; I'm used to Wikipedia, where the articles are supposed to start out as stubs. --Tom Veil 04:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Next time use the {{WIP}} template.--Rataube 10:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Changed substantially, voting reset. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Train-a-Tron

I-think-I-can't -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:20, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Moved and redirect baleeted. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 00:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm reposting the article, because the article was created well before the user-name as a hoax on wikipedia, the user name was just a tribute to it.

It's unclear whether or not this is vanity, so let's take the standpoint that it isn't and vote on it as such. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete.--Rataube 20:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Junk it. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete it then. The original creator was... Train-a-Tron... So it's still vanity in my eyes. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 00:32, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Ferengi

  • Marked for speedy deletion. I disagree, but I guess my sense of humor is different from most people here. What du you think? --85.167.108.209 16:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I just removed the NRV tag... That doesn't mean "speedy deletion". Usually it just means it's too dang short... And you've expanded it substantially... In short: keep. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 16:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This page could become funny so give it a chance and keep it --Jaffaman 18:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It needs edits, but I'm already tied up, so someone else has to do it. Keep. --★J★o★e★[Order_of_Uncyclopedia#Member_.28MUN.29|MUN} 18:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep<<Bradmonogram.png>>18:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It has potential. Keep it. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Stub it. I agree it can go somewhere... --Jocke Pirat 18:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep yes, but it needs someone to take it under their wing. So, speedy keep but speedier stub. --biggy 23:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Chinkish

  • Even though I have no idea who put this up here, weak keep. It's a little bit funny. --★J★o★e★ 16:16, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • GuillotineiconGuillotine. --CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 16:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This article makes Chibi Hinoa cry. Delete. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 18:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Not really feeling the funny vibes, but not that fussed by it. Weak delete. --biggy 23:40, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I am constantly harassed by people who talk like this online. Beyond that... meh. Medium Rare Keep. --Toloran 22:08, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Annihilate. We should not have articles that are purely racist and have a derogatory ethnic slur as the title. The article N****** does not have strongly racist content. --Xiao Li 04:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: not funny racism; come on people. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 01:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Administrators:

I resign. --66.251.26.129 22:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Please delete the following articles of mine: 13375P34K, Matt Groening (person), Matt Groening (Ambiguation), Ex post facto, Time paradox, Final Fantasy X-2, Werner Heisenberg, Werner (Ambiguation), Erwin_Schrödinger#Schrödinger_Scat, Zangief, Worst 100 Money Making Schemes of All Time #s 100, 99, 98, Worst 100 Lists of All Time, #s 62, 61, 60, 59, Worst_100_Porn_Movies_of_All_Time, #s 95, 88, 11, Worst_100_Quick_Detections_that_an_Uncyclopedia_page_sucks_of_All_Time #s 84, 83, 82, 75, Galactic_Coolness_Board_Declares_Earth_"Coolest_Planet"_for_20th_Consecutive_Year. You can check the history; they're all mine, the IPs are in a range. For various reasons, I want them to go.

  • Keep Why delete it? Just try expanding the articles more often. --Jtaylor1 12:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep(?) - You can't resign, read the Uncyclopedia contract. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • You want out!? There is no way out! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: agreed, out isn't that easy, nominate them one at a time and don't spam the list or you'll incur my wrath. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 01:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Quite contrary. It has little to do with the quality of the articles. Why delete it? Why not ask David Gerard? And do read the actual license for Uncyclopedia. I do have the right to have removed work which I have performed. Among the terms in the license: "The above rights include the right to make such modifications as are technically necessary to exercise the rights in other media and formats." I'm not looking for an out on each article, I'm looking to purge my work. Please do so. Respectfully, --66.251.24.193 21:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Subject to the above terms and conditions, the license granted here is perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright in the Work). Notwithstanding the above, Licensor reserves the right to release the Work under different license terms or to stop distributing the Work at any time; provided, however that any such election will not serve to withdraw this License (or any other license that has been, or is required to be, granted under the terms of this License), and this License will continue in full force and effect unless terminated as stated above.

Further, edits were made on the pages by other users to which this license applies. Unfortunately it is not possible to retroactively terminate the license granted. --Chronarion 21:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Fnord

  • Keep: It was NRVed, but I want it kept, so I'm purring it to you (though it does need a hefty rewrite). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Mmm... bat fuck insanity... --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Hell yeah. Who gets the rewrite? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Spare --CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 20:11, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: Subject material is... well.. very much "black helicopters sent by the Queen of England who is an alien that had my parents put microchips in my head". Bat Fuck Insane. --Bloodrage 04:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
I thought it was George Carlin's "the King of Sweden is using his penis as a radio transmitter to send anti-Semetic lesbian meatloaf recipies to Soupy Sales & Marvin Hamlusch" brand of Bat Fuck Insane. Ah well, you say "either," and I say "both." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
does that include "Jay Leno sends me secret love messages through Television"? --Bloodrage 20:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - It's fnord-tastic. And so am I . 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: It is so bat shit insane I am suprised I didn't think of it first. Major points for linking to that satire wikipedia. --Toloran 07:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Uncycloverse

Implode--Rataube 18:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

  • The author misspelled Douglas Adams. That alone means they shall burn in the depths of despair. Huff it. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • More incoherent then Alcholic on New Years. Flush It --Toloran 21:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.--POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 22:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Vanquish.--Verizanni 03:01, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Author must be legally retarded, failed to meet the guidelines, and needs to read HTBFANJS. --Jtaylor1 12:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Article has potential, but needs lots of work. Keep it. --User:Doc Daneeka Feb 7th 2006 19:27 UTC+1
  • Keep until tomorrow, when I may give it a try. If I won't, annihilate it. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC) Don't care, just deltaco, I'll recreate it if needed. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 09:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Ben Folds

  • Hey, I wrote that article. At least the second half anyway. Why should this article which at least has some comedic quality to it, be deleted when there are countless articles on this site that deserve deletion ten times as much? If you don't like it, edit it and make it better instead of complaining. Don't destroy, rebuild. (unsigned, but presumably User:BirdEgal202)
  • The article has gotten better, might as well keep. But I certainly do purely despise "he's the greatest super-musician/actor/Pokemon/athlete in the universe" kinds of articles. Maybe it's just me but I get this horrible urge to convert the fan worship into something pathetic. Anybody else feel this way?----OEJ 17:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • It would help if I knew who he was, and even if I did, it still wouldn't be funny. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 22:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
    • After the edit, VERY' (and I stress very) weak keep.--POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 01:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Mock Unmercifully See this site -- he's an American musician.----OEJ 23:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Agreed.
  • Nonetheless, an article lacking in any wit to speak of. Remove. --biggy 23:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This article sucks, and is therefore grue food. (Don't kill me for that lameness...) --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Remake/remodel - The new (2nd) paragraph is okay, just needs some links, another gag or two, and a proofreader. Also needs a photo... Let me give it a whirl - no reason why it couldn't amount to something in a couple more passes. --Some user 05:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
OK, still needs a photo and more text, but should be better now. Take another look... --Some user 05:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Write a clever, upbeat piano-based song about, then delete - Look, as a Ben Folds fan, I daresay he deserves better. I like the monkey/Ben Folds picture, and that's it. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: At the risk of turning this molehill into a mountain, I think this points to a larger problem. A lot of first-time contributors find Uncyclopedia via music-related web forums, usenet, mailing lists, etc., and their first impulse is to write something about their favorite recording artist. But writing really funny articles about rock stars strikes me as really hard to pull off, especially if you're a first timer and aren't used to the culture around here. (I myself have tried to edit Frank Black and Ramones, and I'm not happy with either of them, either.) Not to mention that you can easily upset people whose favorite musicians are like sacred cows.
    And I don't mean to single out BirdEgal202, either - at least he (or she?) is trying. I just spent a good 45 minutes looking at some of the other articles in Category:Musicians, and about 75 percent of them are crap, no better than this one, and many are worse. It's deplorable. I'm even thinking about proposing a "Featured Artist" box on the main page, if only to give some incentive to established contributors to go and improve some of these things. Anyway, sorry to vent, I'll get off the soapbox now.  c • > • cunwapquc? 01:41, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with Some_user, it's really not good. Music-related ones are always going to be difficult to do, and I also call for a featured artist on the main page. This one can be lacerated in the pits of hell though--Joeoco 21:43, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Super Secret Journal/Blog 1

Either it's a joke or someone's serious blog, either way, it wasn't funny and it dosen't belong here. --★J★o★e★MUN 19:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

--138.28.149.85 22:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Incinerate. (Alternatively, delete) --biggy 23:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: it's not as funny as it could be but it has a certain special charm that I'm having a hard time putting my finger on. Probably has to do with how hard it is to get there via a link. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 01:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Flush - I don't care. You hear me? I don't care. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Interesting idea certainly, the whole Adrian Mole keepign a diary thing. In this form, though: dump--Joeoco 21:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

ToblerONE

and its subpages (ToblerONE/conspiracy theories and ToblerONE/crew diaries)

Discussion copied from User talk:Muffinscope to help with voting:

This article and its sub-articles appear to be some sort of inside joke with a lot of vanity references and as such have been nominated to Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion. If you would like the article can be saved as a personal page by moving it to User:Muffinscope/ToblerONE; I will probably do so for you if it is voted for deletion. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello there. Since your own talk page mentions not replying there, hopefully you will see this message soon. I have a point I'd like to make regarding the toblerONE page that you listed for deletion, and a question to ask.
First off regarding "vanity," I would like to mention that the user name was chosen specifically because it was a key point in the article (and not the other way around, i.e. it's a key point in the article because it's my username, which would be vanity). I don't know if you'd still consider it vanity in this case, but it does change the scenario. We (there were four writers) only created the username so we could upload the various images, hence the username being based off the article.
Secondly, you list it for deletion because it "seems to be another fantasy world sort of thing." Could you please point me in the direction of the elements of the article that lead you to believe this is about some sort of fantasy world? There are plenty of Uncyclopedia articles about time travel, which is the only major stretch the article makes, in my opinion.
I apologize that you find it stupid and not funny. We put a lot of effort into it, and it does make a lot of (in fact, it is mostly) inside jokes. Because of that, it probably will not be saved, but I like to think that at least some people will see the humor in it, or catch the references (they're not just inside jokes to my circle of friends, there are inside jokes to things that potentially plenty of readers will catch).
Thank you for your time. Muffinscope 00:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Two other points I want to make (and I hope you respond to these soon) regarding the inside joke status of the page. First, if inside jokes are seriously that frowned upon, why is there an entire category devoted to them? Secondly, I'd like to point out that large parts of the article are not inside jokes (for example, the conspiracy theory section should be fairly universally understandable and funny). I would appreciate it if you responded to these points soon. Thank you. Muffinscope 17:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Whether anything is "funny" or not is a subjective and not an objective measurement (hence voting, of course) so I can only offer my personal thoughts, Muffinscope. I find it difficult to pay attention and read all of toblerONE because the jokes have little connection to pre-defined cultural objects. Articles are short compared even to short stories. There is no time to develop characters and situations. Therefore many successful articles rely on readers' pre-defined mental images of well-known people and things. It's one thing to say "Peter danced into the meeting wearing a slinky black evening gown" and another thing to say "Chairman Mao danced onto the UN podium wearing a slinky black evening gown." It's mildly interesting that someone we don't know went to a meeting we haven't yet visualized wearing women's clothing, but most of us know about pudgy puffy Mao and the UN, and we therefore have pre-defined imagery for the scene. OK. So toblerONE is, in my personal opinion, trying to do the job of a comic science-fiction story on a site devoted to a much different kind of comic writing. Remember, a 500-word short story is incredibly short but a 500-word article is a pretty long one.----OEJ 13:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I'm willing to accept the possibility that I just don't get it, which happens sometimes but it really does seem like an inside joke to me. In general, inside jokes are frowned upon; Category:Inside jokes primarily contains jokes that are inside to Uncyclopedia and funny to the general public (Kitten Huffing, AAAAAAAAA!, etc.) or that are inside to admins and manage to sleeze past policies (Edit War (video game), Fisher Price, etc.). Based on my analysez of toblerONE and the possibility that I might be wrong or other people would find it funny, I put it up on vfd and as such it's no longer a matter for me to make executive decisions about. I strongly recommend weighing your case on vfd and seeing how other people feel about the matter. Thanks and I hope this can be resolved amicably. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

As a weasel, and a wild weasel at that, I would like to add my two purloined chicken eggs to this discussion, if I may.
Although I've only been active here a couple of months, I've been getting a feel for the flow of this wiki, an impression of what works and what doesn't work and why it is uncyclopedians vote thumbs up or thumbs down for things.
The core mission here is comedy. When you break down any one article, you must, must go back to the unwritten mantra "would someone besides the author and perhaps their friends get this?" When we say "fantasy world", we mean a fabricated world with a tenuous grasp on "reality" that is (and don't be offended, Muffinscope crew) essentially nonsense. Now, the idea of a toblerone flying around through time with a crew having adventures has potential, but when you start bringing in muffinscopes and what not, there's no frame of reference.
A while ago, there was an issue with Sercia and recently the Uber-Loki family et al, because they made little sense to outside observers. I don't remember what became of Sercia, but the Ubers were taken by their author to his user page. And I suggest you do the same - whatever the hell you guys want to do there is your own business, and us jerks out here in the shark tank can't make snarky comments about how "we don't get it."
Surprising how serious the business of comedy can be, eh? 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence!20:14, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Further commentary -- Sercia et al. were huffed, and the author banned for two weeks for failure to respond to numerous admin communiques/failure to update the articles. I don't think that such will be the case here, but I have to agree with Weasel & Gwax -- to the outside observer, there's really not much here to grab on to, and thus the global humor of the article is somewhat lacking. Clearly this is a labor of love, and quite wacky at that, so I'd hate to see it destroyed. I wouldn't mind seeing this turn into a serial on your user page, but if it remains in the general population, I'm afraid that it will only wind up here again. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete or move to user page. This seems to be another fantasy world sort of thing and as such falls against our policies on fantasy worlds. Additionally, all the discussion of the Muffinscope, whilst the main contributor is User:Muffinscope, makes the page seem like a vanity page. On top of those reasons, I find it to be a stupid and not funny use of the Toblerone name. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
FYI the Muffinscope user was created just for the purpose of this page. I don't know what exactly that changes. 160.39.236.156 23:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

There's a policy against fantasy worlds? What about things like the Great_Time_Travel_War_of_1871? Also (from HTBFANJS): "it's incoherent across a large span of history. This is Good." I thought this was an endorsement of fantasy worlds (as long as they're funny).128.59.34.148 04:46, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Move to user page. I almost voted for "deletion" when I saw the mis-quote of Bauhaus (it's TELEGRAM SAM!) but I can forgive some things. Still, it's clearly an inside joke. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to user page, second - Busy, inspired, but ultimately an inside joke gone wild, this needs to live where its creators doth dwell. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 13:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to user page --CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 20:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This article is pure genius.--DeathByPie 17:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • We must organize a rescue mission. --Andrusi 18:30, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to user page--Bradaphraser 22:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Remake/Remodel - If this were reformulated as, say, Joint Swiss-American Space Program, with the focus changed to the inevitable culture-clash, I think you'd have a major improvement with relatively little effort. Right now this looks like the authors were trying to write a parody of a parody of a bad sci-fi TV series, or a Wikipedia page about same, or something to that effect. They've basically just out-thought themselves... That doesn't happen too often around here, but we should at least appreciate the effort, and either way this is still a lot better than the sort of "Moogawooga the Platypus God is the Most Powerful Being in the Universe and PWNS NOOBS without mercy" dreck it's being (implicitly) compared to. And KiY, Bauhaus covered that one; it was originally a T.Rex song. --Some user 00:47, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to user page Neoliminal 19:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  • User:Muffinscope seems not to be paying any attention and has not said anything regarding moving the article to a user page so in short order I'm just going to delete it and if anyone complains it can be restored. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 01:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
I was just under the impression that once a decision was made, you would take care of the move. In the original message you left on my talk page, you said "f you would like the article can be saved as a personal page by moving it to User:Muffinscope/ToblerONE; I will probably do so for you if it is voted for deletion." This is why I have not taken the action with it, I just assumed that once the discussion ran its course, you would have done the moving. I was in fact paying very close attention to the discussion, but stayed out of it because I already made my points, and wanted to see what everyone else had to say. Muffinscope 17:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
And so it shall be, moved to User:Muffinscope/ToblerONE. My previous comment was because we've had cases where a discussion like this arises and then we never hear from the user again. Thanks for being reasonable about this (a rarity in this line of work). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 06:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza Aguirre

  • Delete. This would be a good QVFD candidate, but I accidently laughed at the picture --Keithhackworth MUN 16:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Borrar--Rataube 17:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Estállelo. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Moogawooga

This is WIP, but complete non-notable nonsense that should be deleted by an administrator before the author wastes any more effort on it. --Winston 04:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Note: It should be noted that the author is A: an administrator, B: the administrator that takes care of vfd and C: me. Thank you and please have a nice day. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
    • That said, it is crap and was created in reference to somebody complaining that people were likely to go and write a crappy article exactly like that. So, I of course wrote the initial version of that article. I would love it if someone could expand/rewrite it but I expect the odds are low and I'm way too busy to write something decent myself. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 05:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. That was me, and I wasn't complaining, gwax - I was just saying that "ToblerONE" was better than most vanity articles, and it had nothing to do with the likelihood that more people might write them... I'm sorry to say that Moogawooga really is deletable now, mostly because of the crappy illustration, which IMO sent it well over the line from "clever inside joke" into "stupid bit of dreck." It would still have looked like a vanity piece to someone not in on the joke, but since you're in on it, do at least check my version out if you haven't already - I don't expect anyone else to get it, but to me this is the funniest page on the whole website, and getting funnier. (All modesty aside, of course!)  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is far from being afraid to awaken the anger of Gwax. I found the page strangly humorous. However, that picture needs to be redone. BADLY. I suck at image editing; do we have a volunteer? --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 06:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Ehhh, you could always put the original one back... --Some user 06:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Arse age

Kevin he

Huffed.

Aids

  • Guillotineicon Guillotine for stupidity.

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 01:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Worldwide Jewish conspiracy

*come to thnik of it, maybe it should go on QVFD. --CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 01:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Shazbot

*Seriously, what the hell is this shit? I have floccinaucinihilipilificated this, and it is indeed worthless. Delete. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 06:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Now why didn't I think of that? Bad Hinoa, no lunch for you... --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I do believe it was from Tribes! --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 03:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Holocaust Denial

  • nuke - offensive and not the sort of signal we want to be sending - even if it is a bit funny, which it isn't --24.15.74.40 02:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • keep - See previous VFDs for reason. --Chronarion 02:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Actually I think previous one was Holocaust denial, but I'm too lazy to go back and check if this one was also vfd-ed. --Gay4Gay5S P I N N I EGay5Gay4 05:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - It pretty much sums up the mindset of holocaust deniers. Which, I think, is pretty hilariously deluded. ComaVN 12:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This article is VFH'd. No need to VFD it.--Jtaylor1 13:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Christ, enough with the "oh no, it's offensive" rigamorole. Every good Islam knows the Holocaust didn't happen. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty tired of seeing this (these?) article(s) put up here. I would suggest, though, that the two articles be Merged into one (with different subheadings, B.) and AAAAAAAAA!), for example.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:25, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I agree with Jtaylor1. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 00:51, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I see no problem with the river. The other one... well, I nominated it for vfd myself, but the people have spoken...--Rataube 07:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars (game)

  • Huff or improve. As you can see from the NRV, this article has 7 days for it's fate to be decided. --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • LOL THAT ARTICEL IS GHEY. D3L3T3. Don't kill me. Please? --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge it with Star Wars or it will be huffed--Jtaylor1 12:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Eh. It sucks. Schmoke it --DeathByPie 17:37, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff mercilessly --Joeoco 21:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Atari Jaguar

*This has, at maximum, one funny sentence in it. Did someone think that numbers could be funny? crush it --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - Crisco, I vfd tagged it an added a rewrite tag. There should be enough gamers at Uncyclopedia here to successfully mock one of the greatest console flops of all time. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
comment -- Wow, I remember when everyone wanted one of those. Then we saw that it had a TI-85 calculator for a controller, and let out a collective groan. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Heh - "Kids these days don't want ergonomic controllers with easy-to-use layouts! They want befuddling keypads that punish the gamer!" actual made-up quote from a fateful Atari development meeting. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 18:36, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
It was either that one, or the "Ergonomics is something that those pussy Swedes made up to sell $400 toilet seats to those clueless Japanese!" statement that was showcased in the GamePurge article. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

*Keep for the sake of justice. It needs a bit of rewriting and expanding though. --Toloran 07:17, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
*RE-WRITING FOR GREAT JUSTICE! Make your time, gentleman! 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 11:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I re-wrote the shit out of this one, and I stand by my work. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 14:08, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Amerindianianites

  • This article sucks, and the history page says it's been tagged with "remove/expand/delete" before. I'm thinking it should be one of those three, fo' sho. But I'm leaning on delete. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 02:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Hinoa4's got the idea. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Euthanize, because "conduct genocide" would be too topical a vote. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Joeoco 21:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep not sure I understand the stub entirely, but I think it might have great potential. --Nerd42eMailTalkUnMetaWPediah2g2 03:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Wickerman

  • pretty crappy, so I'd suggest the GuillotineiconGuillotine

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 20:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

  • This is more of a funny-odd article than a funny-haha one. Make it become funny-haha. Failing that, nuke it. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 21:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Place in wood chipper - I smoke pot, huh huh. I can write about sex, huh huh. I smoke more pot than I have sex, huh huh...I mean, wait, no, I have plenty of sex huh huh huh. I said "sex." Cool. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I've seen the movie, and this does not do it any justice, comedic or otherwise. Burn it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 17:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Polaquian

Lionel Richie

  • GuillotineiconGuillotine, because half contains five sentences, a list, and far too many red links. Oh yeah, and I didn't even crack a smile at it.

--CrownHis Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the GreatCrown 20:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Ah, if only... but then what other shameless whore would VH1 commandeer for I Love the 80's? At least we can Kill the article... "all night long." --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:25, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff it. --—Hinoa KUN (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Kill it, I kill you- it amused me. I mean it. I've got Clarkson as back up. Lionel's magic will be unleashed upon the world and a larger supermarket chain once more.
    • Unsigned votes are of little consequence; sign them even if it's with an IP address. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 01:38, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Wheeling Jesuit University/Buildings/Uncle Tom's Federally Funded Bullshit Project

Personal tools
projects