Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive23

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion
Revision as of 01:17, April 27, 2011 by Fnoodle (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Royal Mail

Meh. Kept. --KATIE!! 00:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Kate & Allie

Pubic lice

East Virginia

Playboy

Muesli

Wonderwoman

Jana Vike-Freiberga

Cult of Personality

Sofa

Bean counter

Funnel

Delete. Tompkinssig   Smallturtle  t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:16, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

A Bunch of Crap

Intellect Faith

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Prince Cheddarhaden VII

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Barcode

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

The Confederate States of Angry Dudes with Pitchforks and Cotton

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Deleted. I can't deal with the rest at the moment, but if it's as bad as this stuff, the first admin who comes along can probably insta-huff it. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 23:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


Foreigner

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff--Rataube 23:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Bill Bailey

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill--Rataube 23:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Lungs

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn--Rataube 23:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Neurotoxin

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Botox reaction

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


Ohno

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Brain Stew

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Skippy the Kangaroo

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD--Rataube 23:30, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Captain Apollo

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • FAST DELETION--Rataube 23:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Necrosis

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Northumbrian Pipes

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

GP2X

Delete, but this and the other pages you nominated are actually better candidates for QVFD. --Hobelhouse 22:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Home Alone

Kamala Markandaya


First Damn Polka Album Ever

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Wtf

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 21:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Disintegrating slowly. Almost bland, certianly not funny. Help it reach nothingness. (Hapless Hero 22:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC))

Mount Doom

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Necrophilia

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah *Delete Tasteless AND bad is not a very strong combination. -- Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 22:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Pubic Holidays

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Rocky Horror Picture Show

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Maedhros

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Menelaus

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 19:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Bury. Although the classicist in me wishes things could be different... --King In Yellow 19:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • The Oracle says it will DIE soon. I feel the same as K.in.Y--Rataube 19:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Save - Come on, I rewrote it. Give me another chance! I always wanted to be funny. --Epictetus 22:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

C. S. Lewis

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Battle of the sexes

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

The Noodle Incident

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Nazi Germany

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Bernoulli

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Bon Scott

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Vradas

Huff'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Pope Benedict XP

  • Oh dear. An un-funny metaphor for something to do with Microsoft and Bill Gates. --Hpesoj 16:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Smite. Oh dear is right. Don't need a college of cardinals to see this article is hopeless. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 18:13, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Excommunicate --King In Yellow 18:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Marshall MacLuhan

Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Does anyone else find this particularly unfunny, and also unnecessary thanks to OCD. Yeah so... Delete. Tompkinssig   Smallturtle  t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete "If I repeat something over and over, that's automatically funny, right?!"--Bradaphraser 03:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • End it's miserable existence. --Mtu 09:50, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and marked for VFD. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 12:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Probably delete. We might also do with Category:Repetition for people who like this sort of thing - David Gerard 12:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I love OCD, but this has the self-referentiality OCD has not. They can coexist--Rataube 13:13, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for now, but if it's not expanded I forsee it's return to VFD. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 00:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I love OCD (and I am obsessive compulsive - at least a little bit). Nonetheless the point of this site is that its funny. Delete. --biggy 00:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. We have enough AAAAA-style pages, and this is not one tenth as clever as Redundancy or Redundancy. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 11:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. And just to be sure - *Delete. I like the picture though. It reminded me of a friend of mine. Could maybe be kept ot moved to ODC. *Delete the rest. --Suresh 11:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and redirect to OCD. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 18:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Tila Tequila

Erik Stroh

Ice cream layer of space

  • Delete. Somebody put a VFD on this in early December, but perhaps forgot to put it to a vote. Well, I'm voting, and I says no. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weasel has the idea - it's had plenty of time for people to improve it. Remove. --biggy 00:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill. --King In Yellow 18:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Shenton Park

Turtlezilla

  • Not sure why this one failed QVFD - its kinda pointless I'm sure you'll all agree. Delete me delete me delete me. --biggy 00:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Methinks the "terrors of VFD" shall overcome Turtlezilla in the beast's final battle. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 00:36, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy miniature model of downtown Tokyo. I thought this dude's name was Gamera, and since when did Gamera need an AIDS joke to be funny? Terrors of VFD all the way in this one, baby. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 02:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Turtlezilla its arse! --Keithhackworth MUN 16:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --King In Yellow 18:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Queue

  • Delete or send to undictionary.--Rataube 02:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Second Rataube's motion. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 12:13, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Don't faff about and further clutter Undictionary - it's already too much a dump for failed articles. Just wipe it. --biggy 00:14, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Ben Burton

  • Huff Putting it here on vfd was easier than deleting it, all the images, and banning all the contributors for an hour with the Uncyclopedia:Vanity_Policies link. Plus there is the off chance this person is notable. (hah). --Splaka 10:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Template:Lasagna

Wisconsin native

As far as I can tell this is just random unfunny nonsense. Delete.--Zyrac 17:52, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Hate symbol

  • Curb stomp. A pathetic excuse for someone to write "SEIG HEIL", and all the more pathetic that they spelled it wrong. Oh, and not funny. Not funny at all. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 12:26, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • This is so lame it makes my head hurt. Annihilate. --Zyrac 17:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • DELETE--Rataube 22:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Bonsai Kitten

Kitten killed --—rc (t) 01:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

New Trier Township High School

  • Not only is the article not funny, the students insist on renominating it over and over again for VFH.--Bradaphraser 00:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Let them have their fun. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 03:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

*Keep The Spinsther said it: these guys have so much invested in their private realm of comedy, it would be a crime to trespass. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 04:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. Unless they insist on removing the vanity tag again without asking. --- Quill Rev. Isra (talk) 09:26, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep A very funny article even for people who have never heard of the place. Keep in mind also, that it went up for a VFD only a week or so ago, and an admin voided the VFD which had 100% keep votes after he read it. Also it isn't a vanity page, because it has a wikipedia article, 277,000 google hits when "New Trier" is entered, and it is absolutely hilarious. Ask Donal Rumsfeld, he was captain of wrestling team there.--68.21.190.131 04:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. Based on the last comment, and based on a re-reading the article, I change my vote. I disagree with the notion that the article is "very funny" since the joke is essentially, "New Trier is an exclusive private school that is really a terrorist camp! Al Jazeera! No black people graduate from here! Students are obsessed with grades!" In fact, I think this article is in need of a complete re-write, you damned high-school O-level taking ninnies. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 12:22, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. 'Cause it is long, have a lots of banners and mentions Cthulhu. It probably attracts a lot of customers too - and Culture freaks googling for Lars von Trier. --Suresh 12:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Kept, but I'm going to regret this. --KATIE!! 19:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Orgasm

Deleted. --KATIE!! 19:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

St. Solopist's College

Doesn't matter now, but it was me, forgot to sign, sorry: --Rataube 20:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 19:55, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Genocide

Was put up for QuickVFD. But is really funny. Keep. -Erolost 15:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

um... No. Not that funny. It doesn't warrant QVFD, but I think it should go. --King In Yellow 15:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep It can be developed in two lines - One - encance the Bloodbath track. Two - enhance the Genesis joke, giving the trademark more a touch of cleansing etno music. --Suresh 15:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep There are much worse articles than this. The main sin of this article is that it's short, but it's the skeleton of a good article, methinks.--Bradaphraser 17:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

This is incredibly offensive to those who suffered under genocide..... Ahahah, I'm just kidding. Keep and Expand. Blay 04:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep Get rid of the Genocide scoreboard and run with the Genosis theme. Mickalos 06:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep - Worth a chuckle. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 12:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

It's harmless, it's just not that funny. At least it doesn't try to hard. I say keep but beautify. --biggy 11:56, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep. Can be improved. Mtu 01:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Kept, unfortunately. --KATIE!! 19:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

United States Presidential Election of 2008

Kept. --KATIE!! 19:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Toilet bowl

Deleted. --KATIE!! 19:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Test In Progress

Consensus says: kept. --KATIE!! 19:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

0. Da Happy Wanderer

  • Shoot me. Acid bitch at me 00:51, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Made me chuckle. --SwordKirby537 02:42, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, there's only a grain of funny but it's lost deep in there and not worth keeping the article for. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:36, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: It isn't funny, but that might just be because I don't get it. --Toloran 04:39, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP: This is the funniest article entitled O. Da Happy Wanderer I have ever read. Ever. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 16:15, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I see NOTHING wrong with it at all. --Captain Radio Willy 23:59, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Nurse back to health. It's sick right now, but some chicken soup and grilled cheese sandwiches should perk it up. --King In Yellow 17:12, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Okay, if this wasn't deleted, Can I remove the VFD marker? --Captain Radio Willy 00:04, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • No. Since people can still vote for its deletion, the tag should stay there. --Boy Toy bitch at me 00:15, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I agree 120% with the Weasel. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 01:24, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. The article was intended as an Uncyclopedia take on the Fool card of the tarot deck (Wikipedia:The Fool (Zero)) and, based on that, it works. Of course, people are free to improve it along the way, which couldn't hurt. --Ogopogo 23:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I can see someone finding this funny (though I don't claim to, myself.--Bradaphraser 00:17, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I snickered - David Gerard 01:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The rest of the High Arcana is waiting to be written... I think this will be much more acceptable when that happens. --King In Yellow 19:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 19:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Guernsey

Moved from QVFD - I dunno about this. It at least made me snicker a little. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 17:04, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Conditional keep Every article that starts with contrary to popular belief, must be destoyed. They make your cerebellium rot. The rest of the article wasn't worse than entry Sweden and I want to keep Sweden.(I can relax my demand to delete sentence contrary to popular belief, to a loud groan of dissatisfaction)--Suresh 17:02, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, and add a Bat-Fuck Insane Template. This had me laughing in that confused oh-my-god-it's-pointing-a-sharpened-yam-at-me way. --King In Yellow 20:49, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Bat-fuck-insane and gentle re-write Very very odd. Which surely is the point of Uncyclopedia. Maybe a few pictures, for example one showing Guernsey glowing blue on a map of the world or something. Certainly the ALL-CAPS titles have to be changed. Otherwise, a good start.--Joeoco 20:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Kept. --KATIE!! 19:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Office etiquette

  • It's all actual office etiquette, and nothing funny. The only part of redeeming value is the phraseology bit towards the bottom. Smowton 11:10, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Save the phraseology at the bottom and Nuke the rest. If that can be done. DELETE. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 12:19, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: I kind of like the phraseology but it gets kind of tiresome really quickly. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 17:52, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite in a highly sarcastic style. It would work. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 05:21, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Either rewrite, or just move the phraseology either to the remnant dump (undictionary) or to an article on marketing speak... --biggy 11:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks like someone rewrote it. I say we keep it now. --Zyrac 18:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Meh, kept. --KATIE!! 19:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Warhammer

  • Delete: It's basically just a diatribe about how much Warhammer players are dorks. Definitely needs more funny and less stupid. A rewrite might convince me otherwise. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 15:43, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite or HUFF! I'm a Warhammer (40K) player and a ragin' dork, and believe me there's a lot of humor to be milked here, both at the game's and players' expenses -- but this article is just Beardy Crap!!! --King In Yellow 14:06, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • I've played it a little bit too and the article really isn't funny for the content. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:45, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:48, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite - I don't know what all this talk of beardy cheese and beardy crap is about, but I've always thought the Warhammer universe had some cool designs. I think Warhammer fanboys here should roll up their sleeves and save this monolitihic, random mess so they may bolster their own righteous fanboyism. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 12:17, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Rewrite is not a useful vote and will be ignored; save or delete only for votes please. If you want to make comments about the articles without voting, do so or mark your votes neutral. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:21, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • Just to make people's lives easy, things are changing again, real soon (see the talk page). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:22, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's actually pretty funny. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 05:08, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Flush Wow, I got yelled at at Uncyclopedia! Sweet! In a bit of revision, I have decided this article sucks and should be destroyed. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 16:01, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • In light of Gwax's recent proclamation, I'm officially changing my vote to Just HUFF! --King In Yellow 20:51, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Deleted. --KATIE!! 19:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

All Undictionary redirects

Done. I left the few that redirect to the Help/Conversion page, which can be deleted if need be. --T. (talk) 01:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC) List here

  • In the spirit of the previous deletion nomination, I vote we keep the 27 undictionary pages but huff all the annoying and broken redirects. --Splaka 05:40, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, but clean up broken links - at least until Undictionary goes away, then we would obviously delete it. --Keithhackworth MUN F@H 13:04, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep is it possible to add to some of the Undictionary definitions to turn them into full articles and thus save them? Some of them just need more work, or revisions, or perhaps a bit more of a description. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:04, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete You guys realize we're proposing deleting the redirects only, right, not the actual Undictionary content? The redirects only work halfway (they don't link to the correct section of the alphabet pages) and they take up pages that could be used for real articles. Some people don't even know how to edit redirect pages to expand them. Orion: yes, of course. If I remember correctly the redirects were never meant to be permanent, just placeholders until full articles were written in place of the redirects. --—rc (t) 04:27, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment And now right below this I see that we are indeed proposing deleting the entire Undictionary. I need to visit VFD more often. --—rc (t) 04:28, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Chronarion 00:33, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete--Rataube 00:40, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: We will keep Undictionary but the redirects will be deleted (as we get around to doing so). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 20:09, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 20:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Aqua Teen Hunger Force

  • Delete. Although I admit I'm drunk, this article fails on nearly every comedic level and should be blasted (don't get me started on the pointless anti-semitism). Someone, especially someone who is not thirteen years old, should come by and whip this into shape, post haste, because it's just the right thing to do. ATHF deserves better ridicule. Dammit. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 04:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Krungthepmahanakonbowornratanakosinmahintar...

Yeah... No... --KATIE!! 02:41, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Volton

  • The author is illiterate and the article is crap. --Hpesoj 23:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree that it's crap, but I'm in a keeping mood. Perhaps I'll come to my senses later. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 03:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Not the typical crap, with some sharp jabs, complete sentences, and an almost inherent will to live. I think we've got a semi-winner here! — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 04:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Danny and Meelika

  • Maybe there is a joke somewhere, but I can't see it. --Hpesoj 22:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Snort out soda through your nose to your computer monitor

  • Bad title, bad idea, bad everything. Fucking Kill.   IAN WELLER-- TALK -- F@H -- VFH -- VFD -- RAND    20:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delta elite -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 21:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The title IS good, but that's the onl good thing. All the rest: NOT funny at all.--Rataube 22:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Yearning to be huffed --biggy 22:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Gee thanks, I listed the page on Peer Review so I could get feedback to help me make it funnier. Oddly enough someone was kind enough to post it here, before I could find a way to fix the article. How come none of you actually reviewed the article and helped me out with it? Easier to just delete something I guess? Nice that all of the votes were counted in less than a few hours, before I could notice it was up for deletion and give my comments. I need this like I need a shotgun in the mouth solution for my headache this has caused. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 23:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Hitchhikers guide to the galaxy

  • Delete to make room for a better one (that will be properly capitalized!) Oops, there already is. All the more reason to HUFF! --King In Yellow 20:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Been done taked care of. =) Strong Rad 20:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep--Rataube 21:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
    • RadX already redirected it. Nevermind! --King In Yellow 21:14, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Dipen

  • Delete - This seems to be a companion page to Catherine, or the vanity page that Catherine is based on. Either way, get rid of it. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 18:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Kill it along with its spawn/progenitor. --King In Yellow 18:48, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Why was this ever written?! Nuke it off the face of the earth, before it starts to smell any worse --biggy 23:00, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Stuart Little Revenge (VG)

Barmy Army

Strasbourg

  • Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 01:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - What' funny about this? Keithhackworth MUN 16:59, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Couldn't tell you. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 18:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for Gods sake It is a joke about Werner Heisenberg, the developer of the uncertainity principle in quantum physics. Heisenberg lead a group of scientists at the University of Strasbourg.

Mac OS V

*Delete --Boy Toy bitch at me 01:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

  • QVFD--Rataube 01:43, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Fianchetto

Shaws Shank Redemption

Destruction of earth

Oh, I love a good Vaping!

vape Destruction of earth
Destruction of earth has been destroyed!

Strong Rad 20:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Carbs

Maryport

German Heimatfilme

.VFD

keep Ok i wrote this today and since i find irony to be hot i am posting it for Deletion. Ok i dont really want it deleted but i figured this was a good place to vote for it Illogicalbeats 20:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Visual basic c plus plus

Yawn. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete. The writing's bad, and it's not funny. --King In Yellow 14:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete - I suspect some programmers out there might see more in this than I do, which would be a lot, since I don't see anything redeeming. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 13:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Tomato Sauce

Al Capone

Anne Heche

Staten Island

Deleted -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 21:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Brotherhood of Anonymous

Catherine

  • Torch. Smells like slander, written in AOLer, attrocious all round. --King In Yellow 19:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Next time you nominate, add the VFD tag. I did it for you this time. --Boy Toy bitch at me 20:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
      • Thanks... forgot this time. --King In Yellow 20:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Jettison. On a separate note, I would like to nominate the following passage for the Wild Weasel Award of Grammatical Excellence :"This dragon again is unique coz this dragon likes books and not fire! as mentioned earlier but dont mess with her coz u know she is a original dragon. " The Bard himself could do no better! — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 12:34, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Profound shit

Delteeted Strong Rad 20:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

  • QVFD. --Boy Toy bitch at me 16:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Profound nonsense --Hpesoj 16:14, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Destroy! The least-funny thing i've ever read so far. --Neko 17:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Flush. --King In Yellow 19:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Bang--Rataube 19:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

19$0

Spwat. It's gone. Strong Rad 20:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Huff. --Boy Toy bitch at me 15:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Hpesoj 16:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Burn it. --Neko 17:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Genocide--Rataube 19:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD --King In Yellow 20:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Bangor

Halo 2

  • What on earth is this crap? --Hpesoj 17:25, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC) I put an NRV tag on there, but PiOfFive decided to delete it. This article may be a half-decent length, but it certainly has no content. Unless anyone wants to re-write it NOW, I suggest deletion.
  • Execute by axe. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 18:56, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Undeleted Two votes aren't enough to delete an article with a 50 edit history and original image. For the wages of democracy is suckiness. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 02:04, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • HA HA... No. -- "Halo 2 is an RPG that came out for the Sega Gamegear in 812 A.D. No one liked it because it didn't have lesbian sex scenes like all the other games." Those two sentences turned me off of the article. Write a betetr beginning. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 15:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite Not at all funny the way it stands, but maybe a rewrite could cure it. A possible tangent could be that Halo2 is a film glorifying the genocide committed by humans under the influence of Oprah? If it does get deleted I'd be up for the first draft of the rewrite--Joeoco 20:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Frag it. --King In Yellow 14:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Bash with rifle butt. Needless to say, Master Chief with bacon has potential. Fatty potential. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 12:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Me-too-ism

  • Not one laughter. --Boy Toy bitch at me 15:33, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Admittedly, not funny. --Hpesoj 17:33, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Could be funny though. Maybe I'll rewrite after some more coffee and/or Everclear.----OEJ 17:37, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Gay/huff

  • It's simply not funny. There's not one punchline, it's short and poorly written, and the grammer is terrible. Delete. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 22:51, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • You should have just marked it NRV; I have gone and done so. If someone wants to save it, they can speak up, otherwise it'll go eventually. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 00:00, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • Never mind, I'm an idiot, that was QVFD material and I've huffed it. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:32, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Hermaphroditism

  • Lacks a punchline. Boy Toy bitch at me 02:08, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • (Added VFD at bottom of entry - as it should be)--Suresh 04:41, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Article has potential. Just needs to be expanded. --SwordKirby537 02:44, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Naa, Delete is more like it. --Suresh 04:41, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not funny. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 04:51, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I know it's out of character for me, but I say Rewrite. I think the principle concept of it could be funny, but the article is in need of a genuinely terrific author to reach salvation. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 05:16, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Totally destroy. No rewrite can save this. Not even one written by an actual hermaphrodite. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 16:03, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Blow it up. I wanna hear it go pow. --King In Yellow 17:08, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Haxor

List of Pitied Fools

  • COMMENT The category consensus has already caused two users to go through and indiscriminately tag the entries (and get banned for it), although Raddy said it should only be for pages that warrant it. This is Bad. We should either scrap the idea and leave the original page, scrap the idea and delete the original page, or be very clear that not all the pages need it. --—rc (t) 01:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I agree with RC. I would also add that indiscriminate tagging is category-spamming, in my humble view. We don't want the Steve Ballmer and Kanye West things all other again. --Ogopogo 01:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Delorted I created the category Fools Pitied by Mr. T, and moved the list to User:RadicalX/LOPF so that the category can be put on those that are articles and that warrant it. Strong Rad 19:25, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • This one's actually got a decent viewcount; betcha I get whined at by at least one person just for submitting this to VFD, but oh well. I suspect that this list's popularity is a big part of the reason why new users create pointless lists containing random people off the top of their head. And besides that, there aren't even any jokes here. Delete --EvilZak 07:23, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete but yeah, that looks like the sort of thing that'll get people bitching a whole lot about how great it is and how it should be kept. When will people learn that sort of thing is what categories are for. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 07:35, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is but a pale shadow of the Onion's classic "Mr.T Releases His List of Pitied Fools '86", which is replete with Mr.T style sayings and a historical context. Not to sound too in awe of the Onion or anything, but they had the right idea. Our list is joke-free and should be axed. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 12:11, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I understand where y'all are coming from, but the humor/jokes involved, while subtle, are there, in the names themselves. --Curious Larry 13:15, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Gwax said it --Suresh 15:18, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Suresh said it. --Rataube 22:57, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Plagiarism. And very obvious plagiarism at that. --66.251.25.253 00:57, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Category C'mon, it's a classic!....by which I mean..."It's really old!" Strong Rad 01:13, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I see what Evil Zak is saying. I feel he thought my lists of carefully selected people were just as random, but they weren't. In this case, I think RadicalX has the right idea - just do a category of "Mr. T's Pitied Fools". Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 01:20, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I second Dawg's idea.--Bradaphraser 04:19, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • OFF WITH IT'S HEAD! --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 05:17, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Fisher Price

Kept. +6 in favor. This discussion will be copied into the Fisher Price talk page. Strong Rad 20:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete --Nytrospawn 00:12, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, for obvious reasons. --Algorithm (talk) 00:14, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, but keep it on the down low. --KATIE!! 00:15, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Expand or Delete.--Rataube 00:16, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC) Keep, couse of Volte's retrospective. --Rataube 04:03, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, it's not hurting anything and the grammatical complexity of the sentence will make for a good article eventually. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 00:18, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

*Vapourize, or enlighten me.--Suresh 00:26, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Super-delete. Even with retrospect article, there is no connection between the so belowed offensive sentence and Ficher Price what so ever.--Suresh 14:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Fisher Price: A Retrospective Expanded and kept at the same time. Brilliant! I rule this page kept. --KATIE!! 02:37, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Three for and three against is not sufficient to mark something kept. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 03:46, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: Even after having the joke explained to me, I still think it's crap. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 03:47, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

(comment) - redirect to infants?--Suresh 05:37, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep and Speedy keep as same name --Splaka 04:11, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but leave the vfd template. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 05:02, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Why are we even voting on this? Decimate! Although I appreciate the irony, it is far too short, far too juvenile on its own, and far too simple. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great 05:26, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Or else. Yea... ELSE. Tompkinssig   Smallturtle  t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:29, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP. This is much better than anything I've done, that's for sure. — — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Icons-flag-us Fire! 16:18, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep With the analysis, this goes from deletable crap/vandalism to comedy gold.--Bradaphraser 23:12, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • If this is to be kept, then it most be moved to a new name space, as Fisher Price is something entirely different --Nytrospawn 00:11, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Vote Witheld until someone can explain to me why a four-word page is keepable, especially when said four words are "go eat shit fuckers." --King In Yellow 17:16, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Im with King In Yellow - Is this discussion some kind of joke, or has the page been vandalised somehow (the history suggests this article always read "go eat shit fuckers.")? --Hpesoj 17:46, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Basically, a few of the admins like this article for some inexplicable reason and a short delete/undelete war took place and it ended up here. I don't see it as any more than vandalism but there are people voting to keep it and I'm pretty sure they're serious. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:02, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I've already voted, but just to be clear here, one of the biggest reasons I like Uncyclopedia is because it tries to maintain some semblance of quality and if we start keeping articles like this because we think they're somehow ironic (which they aren't) we will be no better than any other 13 year old infested forum on the internet. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 18:07, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Nobody likes this article by itself. The entire reason that so many of us are trying to keep it is because without it, the analysis (which, the article itself was written by me, was more or less a collaborative effort, or at least collaborative inspiration) cannot exist. Without this absurdly terrible article to contrast the overly verbose and formal retrospective, it loses all trace of irony and it becomes just another piece of shallow pseudo-enyclopedic humour about something that is entirely made up. And before anyone suggests it, putting the sentence on the same page as the analysis will not have the same effect. I will grant that the analysis isn't that good, but I think it more than makes up for allowing this out-of-the-way one-liner to exist. If this is deleted, the retrospective will be removed as well, or at least remanded to my own user space. Oh, and, I hate to say it, but to say that allowing one ridiculous one-liner that acts only as a catalyst for another, better-written article lowers us to the level of any other 13-year-old infested site on the internet is being extremely melodramatic. We all care about the quality of the site, and to imply that I/we don't because of this is rather insulting. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 19:06, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
      • That doesn't quite make sense because the retrospective was written in response to the article's exisence so it implies a decision to keep before it was written or even conceived. The retrospective might be funny but it does not justify the preservation of an article that should be about a toy company and contains "go eat shit fuckers" instead. Furthermore, I don't see what's so bad about keeping the retrospective and huffing Fisher Price. Link to the retrospective from Anonymous and structure it as an analytical essay on the work. Don't require the article, act as though anyone can walk down to the bookstore and pick up a copy; plenty of other people do that all the time (Moby-Dick at wikipedia for example). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 19:29, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
        • The retrospective was written as a response to the article, and the article was kept because we were planning to write a retrospective. It's not a chicken-and-the-egg situation. As for your other points about Moby Dick: as it is, keeping Fisher Price and its retrospective separate is very similar to going to the bookstore to read Moby Dick (i.e. going to a separate page to read it). What some people are suggesting is putting the entire text of Moby Dick either within an analysis of the book, or within a biographical page about Herman Melville. Neither of these things would ever happen in a real situation, and that is why the Fisher Price article should be kept separate. This type of comedy, however absurd, is more funny if it maintains a more or less direct parallel to reality. If you want the article Fisher Price to be about the toy company, move the article in question to Fisher Price (literary work) and that particular problem is solved; it should be noted that Fisher Price is retroactively implied to be the title of the work and so it would still fit. I would even be open to disussion of changing the title of both the article and the retrospective to something totally different, since that really has nothing to do with anything aside from being a small piece of non-sequitur humour. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 19:52, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
          • I've read some fantastically good works of fiction that referenced other works that don't exist and pulled it off quite well (House of Leaves for example). --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:17, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
            • Ooh, you could quote different segments of one or two words (maybe three but probably not) and never actually include the entire text, that would make for a fantastically cryptic and obfuscated presentation method. (I'm thinking about this too much, aren't I?) --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:20, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
              • The problem is that the article doesn't have much content to reference (ok, it has no content) so doing that wouldn't really work. If it were an allusion it may work, but as a direct reference I don't see any way to do it (mind you, I've never read House of Leaves). --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 21:44, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
        • But without the original article there is no point to the retrospective, and without the retrospective there is no point to the original article. The retrospective isn't funny unless you know about the article that spawned it, it would just become a clever analysis of a random sentence, which wouldn't really belong on uncyclopedia. If there is a problem with it being under the title "Fisher Price", then change it, as Volte said to "Fisher Price: Literary Work" --Hpesoj 19:40, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
          • The problem is less about the location and more about the existence. --Sir gwax (talk) Signuke 21:17, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
            • Context is the key. This is a rather thin comparison, but I'm reminded of the countless discussions I have seen about racial epithets such as "nigger" - there are always two camps; one side says the word is always offensive and should never be used ever, and the other side says the word is not inherently offensive and the offensiveness is in how you use it. I feel that this article, although created as a mindless graffito, has been transformed into something which merits existence simply by its context and association. On the other hand, it seems you feel that such an article should never exist in any context simply because it is what it is -- four words long, much like the people who feel that "nigger" is never to be used even in a non-racial context. In my opinion, as long as the context of the article is made clear by whatever method is necessary, it stands apart from all other articles of the same quality. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 21:44, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Having now read the analysis, this is still pants. Maybe the analysis is quite clever, but the sentence is hardly. There are many sentences which could be interpreted in multiple ways, and certainly to have just those four words under a seemingly un-related title of "Fisher Price" is stupid (unless anyone wants to explain). The article could be regarded as clever, but not funny. I say either re-name it, or delete it and leave the retrospective. --Hpesoj 18:46, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC) SAVE - Volte, I get it now, at first I thought the writer of the Retrospective posted the "main" article. Vote changed.
  • Delete - It is with a heavy heart that I vote to delete this article. While I chuckled at the war it started, and a bit at the retrospective, the reality is that the article is crap and should be huffed mercilessly. Strong Rad 18:51, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Thank you all for your views and reasonings, which have been quite edifying. I believe that I now understand why this isn't on my QVFD list. Being an Literature scholar myself, I thought the analysis was an absolute scream. Kudos to Volte for this bit of genius. However, I feel that allowing the Fisher Price article to stand as is will only result in its repeated nomination for VFD or QVFD, as many readers who stumble across it will automatically assume that it's either been vandalized (which seems to be the case anyway,) or the work of a colossal Asshat, and won't bother clicking on the link to the real humor. I know I didn't, and I almost QVFD'd it until I saw the VFD template and ambled over here to see what the rumpus was. Therefore, I vote to Merge the "article" with the retrospective. While the Moby Dick analogy would indeed work with a longer "piece of narrative prose," in this case it's truly moot, as four words are easy enough to reprint and doing so would only add to the humor of the retrospective (provided they are implemented in the form of a literary preamble or introduction, in an appropriately worshipful, reverent tone.) Failing this, I see no alternative but to Euthanize it, and remember it fondly. --King In Yellow 20:28, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • I believe some sort of faux template at the bottom could solve the issue with people VFD'ing it (something somewhat funny that still indicates that the article, as it is, is an exception to a very important rule and should not be repeated or deleted). As for the Moby Dick analogy not applying because of the length, I think that adds to the absurdity of the whole thing. It treats the four-word sentence as though it is a novel. It is not an analysis of a four-word sentence, it is an analysis of a four-word epic. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 21:05, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Would not changing the article title be effective in preventing a re-occurance of this VFD? If that wouldn't do the job then somehow emphasising its link with the retrospective would surely work? Or failing that, actually add something to the page that says explicitly "Don't vote for deletion", or something that implies that fairly clearly anyway. Merging would not work, as the comedy value comes from the fact that the article was actually the work of some spammer, sure you could point out that the sentence previously had it's own article, but I don't think that would have the same effect. --Hpesoj 20:49, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I think the fact that this article was User 4.252.99.182's only contribution to Uncyclopedia should hold some weight in the matter, because it changes the context of "go eat shit fuckers" slighty, but enough so that I think it merits deletion. The only thing that makes the article funny is the heading it's been put under, but the fact that "Fisher Price" could just as easily be substituted with a good number of other things (and the fact that this substitution would not change the hilarity/lack thereof of this article) suggests that the article is not substantive enough to defend itself and therefore earn preservation. Also it is teh suck. --Skyscraper 20:37, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
    • Again, the article itself has no intrinsic comedy value. Not even the heading. The article itself has no reason within itself to remain. I only request it be kept as a catalyst to make the retrospective page a little deeper. See above for reasons why I feel it is necessary for it to remain in its current state. --Sir Volte KUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH) 21:19, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

KEEP - Without it, the other artlicle doesn't have its funniness. Life needs ridiculous things that make no sense to laugh at, like the Detroit Lions, or Urkel. Jlove1982 22:20, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: Any article that arises such a long and intreting controversy should be kept. The controversy itself makes it worthy, almost as much as volte´s article does. Add this to its disscusion page. --Rataube 01:09, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Humor is highly subjective, and no matter how cleverly you argue your point, the current tally is (forgive my dubious counting skills) seven deletes to twelve keeps, which, unless there's some huge upset, means the page stays. Y'all can quit your bitchin' now. -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 01:45, 18 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • KEEP THIS This is the most intelligently put-together article i have ever read. Uncyclopedia needs more articles like Fisher Price. A quadruple Plus. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 15:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. We kept Euroipods. Besides it's funny in its own way, but only with the Fisher Price title. Blay 04:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Flowbiscuit

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

University of Texas at Arlington

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Columbus, OH

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Liam O'Brien

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Umpteenth Fuzzy Hat War

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

IGN.com

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Making up Racso Edliw quotes

Gone'd. I didn't realize until after I'd smoked it that it was yet another Nerd42 creation. <sigh> --T. (talk) 15:03, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Delete - Nothing will ever come of this. Boring, unreadable... I'd like to replace it on the Quotes template with "Sir Alec Dow, England's Greatest Anagrammatist," but for aesthetic reasons I'd like this to go away first. (Please? It's my first VFD attempt!) --Some user 01:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Monster

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC) Destroy all Monster.

  • Kill the beast. Nomination not signed, but if it's really necessary, then say I nominate it.--Rataube 01:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Huff. I had a cat named Monster. About as funny, if not more so. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 11:11, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • QVFD. No trial, just execution. --King In Yellow 18:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

OSNews

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC) Delete. This is not ED. --Rataube 00:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

St. Solopist's College

  • Delete - I've been watching it for a while, and nobody is showing any interest in improving this.
  • We voted to keep it, just two days ago, and someone nominates it again without signing???--Rataube 20:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Sounds like a reason to keep to me. Oh, no, it doesn't, because the article does suck. Crap, now I'll feel guilty if I vote to delete, because if you're not with the signed, you're with the unsigned, or something like that. I'll NRV it and let someone else bell the cat. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] Prince%21.gif 21:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Reggaeton

Arrow'd -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - Sounds like someone don't like reggae. I don't like this unfunny, poorly written, racist article. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 18:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Baleete. Agree with WW. I changed it around so every paragraph attacks another kind of pop music, but who cares, it's shite anyway.----OEJ 18:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  • BOMB. --King In Yellow 18:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

2034

Delete. Utter and incurable bullshit. --Mtu 02:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: Dunno about "incurable" - sorta works when put against the standard format of a year article. Could do with work though - David Gerard 12:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep couse of Gerard's comment.--Rataube 13:27, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Diddy Men

*Snuff. I like the picture and the concept of a tickle stick, but the article is weak and in my mind un-expandable. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 15:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep -- Gay4 Gay5 S P I N N I E Gay5 Gay4 18:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redeemable. Needs some expantion. --Rataube 01:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Re-writing - I'm putting my money where my fingers are, which is on the keyboard - if I don't make it funnier, it can always be reverted to the version Spinnie and Rataube like. Meh, indeed. 2nd lt. sir wild weasel kun vfh fp Icons-flag-us sex & violence! 11:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Lame iDevices

Multi-huffed -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:10, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

I think we can shamelessly huff the following:

I also suggest cleaning the template, removing redlinks that have little potential and removing redlinks left from the above articles. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 18:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools
projects